Prognostic factor analysis of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer - A multi-institutional clinical study in Asia

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Combined With Pharmacogenomic-Guided Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation combined with pharmacogenomic-guided chemotherapy in treating patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with unresectable PC (stage III 17, stage IV 14) were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into group A (pharmacogenomic-guided chemotherapy following HIFU treatment, n = 13) and group B (traditional chemotherapy following HIFU treatment, n = 18). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate tumor response. Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival.

RESULTS

The mean pain intensity score in 18 patients decreased from 6.6 ± 2.2 before HIFU to 3.3 ± 1.0 after HIFU (p = 0.000). The mean duration of pain relief was 5.2 ± 3.2 mo in group A and 2.4 ± 1.3 mo in group B (p = 0.026). There was no significant difference of the non-perfused volume ratio (83.5% ± 22.3% in group A and 85.3% ± 16.8% in group B) between the two groups. The median survival time was 14 mo in group A and 5 mo in group B. The 6 and 12-mo survival rates were 74.1% and 59.3% in group A, and 32.4% and 19.4% in group B, respectively. The difference in survival between the two groups was significant (p = 0.04). No severe complications (≥grade 3) related to HIFU were observed. Bone marrow depression was the main adverse reaction related to chemotherapy, with grade 3 bone marrow depression observed 2 (15.4%) patients in group A and 7 (38.9%) patients in group B.

CONCLUSION

HIFU combined with pharmacogenomic-guided chemotherapy is safe and effective in treating patients with advanced PC. It provides better clinical outcomes in pain relief, quality of life and survival benefits for patients with advanced PC compared to HIFU combined with traditional chemotherapy. This combined approach may have the potential to become an important supplement to the treatment of advanced PC.

Pulsed Electric Fields in Oncology: A Snapshot of Current Clinical Practices and Research Directions from the 4th World Congress of Electroporation

The 4th World Congress of Electroporation (Copenhagen, 9-13 October 2022) provided a unique opportunity to convene leading experts in pulsed electric fields (PEF). PEF-based therapies harness electric fields to produce therapeutically useful effects on cancers and represent a valuable option for a variety of patients. As such, irreversible electroporation (IRE), gene electrotransfer (GET), electrochemotherapy (ECT), calcium electroporation (Ca-EP), and tumour-treating fields (TTF) are on the rise. Still, their full therapeutic potential remains underappreciated, and the field faces fragmentation, as shown by parallel maturation and differences in the stages of development and regulatory approval worldwide. This narrative review provides a glimpse of PEF-based techniques, including key mechanisms, clinical indications, and advances in therapy; finally, it offers insights into current research directions. By highlighting a common ground, the authors aim to break silos, strengthen cross-functional collaboration, and pave the way to novel possibilities for intervention. Intriguingly, beyond their peculiar mechanism of action, PEF-based therapies share technical interconnections and multifaceted biological effects (e.g., vascular, immunological) worth exploiting in combinatorial strategies.

[Irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients underwent IRE after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer between 2015 and 2022. IRE was performed during laparotomy as a rule (n=22). In one case, IRE was combined with palliative pancretoduodenectomy. Nineteen (86.3%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after the procedure. The follow-up examination included contrast-enhanced CT/MRI of the abdomen, chest X-ray or CT, analysis of CA 19-9 marker one month after surgery and then every three months.

RESULTS

Complications after IRE developed in 5 (21.7%) patients. Three patients (13.0%) had arrhythmia, two (8.7%) ones had pancreatic necrosis. A 90-day mortality after the procedure was 4.3% (n=1), the cause was pancreatic necrosis. According to intraoperative data and the first examination (CT/MRI), the entire tumor infiltrate was treated in 21 (91.3%) cases. Median follow-up was 19 months. Median period until local recurrence was 15 months. Isolated local recurrence was observed in 7 patients. Of these, 3 ones underwent radiotherapy, one patient underwent repeated IRE. Distant metastases were found in 11 patients; systemic therapy was restarted. Median time to progression was 7 months after IRE and 14 months after initiation of chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 16 months after electroporation and 25 months after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Irreversible electroporation may be useful in carefully selected patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma after successful induction chemotherapy. This procedure provides local control, but the impact on long-term outcomes and feasibility of routine use should be analyzed in randomized trials.

Minimally invasive image-guided therapy of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with limited treatment options and poor life expectancy. The only curative option is surgical resection, but only 15%-20% of patients are resectable at presentation because more than 50% of patients has distant metastasis at diagnosis and the rest of them has locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The standard of care first line treatment for LAPC patients is chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. Recent developments in minimally invasive ablative techniques may add to the treatment armamentarium of LAPC. There are increasing number of studies evaluating these novel ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and irreversible electroporation. Most studies which included pancreatic tumor ablation, demonstrated improved overall survival in LAPC patients. However, the exact protocols are yet to set up to which stage of the treatment algorithm ablative techniques can be added and in what kind of treatment combinations. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer has dismal prognosis with 5-year survival is only 3%. The most common metastatic site is the liver as 90% of pancreatic cancer patients develop liver metastasis. Chemotherapy is the primary treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, when the tumor is not responding to chemotherapy or severe drug toxicity develops, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease progression and improve survival in selected patients. During the last decade new therapeutic options arose with the advancement of minimally invasive technologies to treat pancreatic cancer patients. These new therapies have been a topic of increasing interest due to the severe prognostic implications of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer and the low comorbid risk of these procedures. This review summarizes new ablative options for patients with LAPC and percutaneous liver-directed therapies for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Irreversible Electroporation Treatment With Intraoperative Biliary Stenting for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Pilot Study

Background

Treating perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is particularly difficult due to the fact that it is usually in an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Irreversible electroporation treatment (IRE) involves the local administration of a high-voltage electric current to target lesions without causing damage to surrounding structures. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of using IRE in conjunction with intraoperative biliary stent placement in cases of unresectable PHCC.

Methods

This study enrolled 17 patients with unresectable Bismuth type III/IV PHCC who underwent IRE in conjunction with intraoperative biliary stent placement (laparotomic) in two medical centers in Asia between June 2015 and July 2018. Analysis focused on the perioperative clinical course, the efficacy of biliary decompression, and outcomes (survival).

Results

Mean total serum bilirubin levels (mg/dL) on postoperative day (POD) 7, POD30, and POD90 were significantly lower than before IRE (respectively 3.46 vs 4.54, p=0.007; 1.21 vs 4.54, p<0.001; 1.99 vs 4.54, p<0.001). Mean serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9, U/ml) levels were significantly higher on POD3 than before the operation (518.8 vs 372.4, p=0.001) and significantly lower on POD30 and POD90 (respectively 113.7 vs 372.4, p<0.001; 63.9 vs 372.4, p<0.001). No cases of Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV adverse events or mortality occurred within 90 days post-op. The median progression-free survival was 21.5 months, and the median overall survival was 27.9 months. All individuals who survived for at least one year did so without the need to carry percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) tubes.

Conclusions

It appears that IRE treatment in conjunction with intraoperative biliary stent placement is a safe and effective approach to treating unresectable PHCC. The decompression of biliary obstruction without the need for PTBD tubes is also expected to improve the quality of life of patients.

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Percutaneous Management Using Ablation, Brachytherapy, Intra-arterial Chemotherapy, and Intra-tumoral Immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive neoplasms, bearing a terrible prognosis. Stage III tumors, also known as locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), are unresectable, and current palliative chemotherapy regimens have only modestly improved survival in these patients. At this stage of disease, interventional techniques may be of value and further prolong life. The aim of this review was to explore current literature on locoregional percutaneous management for LAPC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Locoregional percutaneous interventional techniques such as ablation, brachytherapy, and intra-arterial chemotherapy possess cytoreductive abilities and have the potential to increase survival. In addition, recent research demonstrates the immunomodulatory capacities of these treatments. This immune response may be leveraged by combining the interventional techniques with intra-tumoral immunotherapy, possibly creating a durable anti-tumor effect. This multimodality treatment approach is currently being examined in several ongoing clinical trials. The use of certain interventional techniques appears to improve survival in LAPC patients and may work synergistically when combined with immunotherapy. However, definitive conclusions can only be made when large prospective (randomized controlled) trials confirm these results.

Clinical Phase I/II Study: Local Disease Control and Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Electrochemotherapy

Objective. To assess local disease control rates (LDCR) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT). Methods. Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was performed in 25 LAPC patients who underwent baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and/or Computed Tomography (CT) and Position Emission Tomography (PET) scans before ECT and 1 and 6 months post ECT. LDCR were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and Choi criteria. Needle electrodes with fixed linear (N-30-4B) or fixed hexagonal configurations (N-30-HG or I-40-HG or H-30-ST) or variable geometry (VGD1230 or VGD1240) (IGEA S.p.A., Carpi, Italy) were used to apply electric pulses. Pain evaluation was performed pre-ECT, after 1 month and after 6 months with ECT. Overall survival estimates were calculated by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. At 1 month after ECT, 76% of patients were in partial response (PR) and 20% in stable disease (SD). Six months after ECT, 44.0% patients were still in PR and 12.0% in SD. A LDCR of 56.0% was reached six months after ECT: 13 patients treated with fixed geometry had a LDCR of 46.1%, while for the 12 patients treated with variable geometry, the LDCR was 66.7%. The overall survival median value was 11.5 months: for patients treated with fixed geometry the OS was 6 months, while for patients treated with variable geometry it was 12 months. Electrochemotherapy was well-tolerated and abdominal pain was rapidly resolved. Conclusions. Electrochemotherapy obtained good results in terms of LDCR and OS in LAPC. Multiple needle insertion in a variable geometry configuration optimized by pre-treatment planning determined an increase in LDCR and OS compared to a fixed geometry configuration.

The Impact of Patient Age ≥80 Years on Postoperative Outcomes and Treatment Costs Following Pancreatic Surgery

As life expectancy is increasing, elderly patients are evaluated more frequently for resection of benign or malignant pancreatic lesions. However, the impact of age on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs in octogenarian patients (≥80 years) undergoing major pancreatic surgery needs further investigation. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2015 and March 2019 in a major hepatopancreatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs of octogenarians and younger patients were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. During the study period, 346 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, and other procedures were performed in 54%, 20%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The major postoperative morbidity rate and postoperative mortality rate were 25% and 3.5%, respectively. A total of 39 patients (11%) were ≥80 years old, and 307 patients were <80 years old. The majority of octogenarians suffered from ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas among younger patients, other indications for a pancreatic resection were predominant (ductal adenocarcinoma 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.006). Age ≥80 was associated with more frequent postoperative medical (pulmonary, cardiovascular) and surgical (high-grade pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage) complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.4% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). This finding may be explained by the higher rate of type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 5%), resulting more frequently in postoperative hemorrhage (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.002) among patients ≥80 years old. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age ≥80 years predicted postoperative mortality independently of the tumor entity and surgical technique (p = 0.013, OR 6.71, 95% CI [1.5–30.3]). Increased major postoperative morbidity was responsible for lower cost recovery in octogenarians (94% vs. 102%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, patient age ≥80 years is associated with increased postoperative medical and surgical morbidity after major pancreatic surgery leading to lower cost recovery and a lower chance for successful resuscitation in patients requiring revisional surgery for postoperative hemorrhage and/or pancreatic fistula. In octogenarian patients suffering from pancreatic tumors, careful selection, and thorough prehabilitation is crucial to achieve the best postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes.