1
|
Carleton N, Abidi H, Puthanmadhom-Narayanan S, Marroquin OC, Oesterreich S, Diego EJ, Brufsky AM, Lee AV, McAuliffe PF. Omission of surgery, primary endocrine therapy adherence, and effect of comorbidity in older women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101679. [PMID: 38135542 PMCID: PMC10994773 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Carleton
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hira Abidi
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Steffi Oesterreich
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Emilia J Diego
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Adrian V Lee
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- Women's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waterhouse JV, Welch CA, Battisti NML, Sweeting MJ, Paley L, Lambert PC, Deanfield J, de Belder M, Peake MD, Adlam D, Ring A. Geographical Variation in Underlying Social Deprivation, Cardiovascular and Other Comorbidities in Patients with Potentially Curable Cancers in England: Results from a National Registry Dataset Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e708-e719. [PMID: 37741712 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To describe the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), multiple comorbidities and social deprivation in patients with a potentially curable cancer in 20 English Cancer Alliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS This National Registry Dataset Analysis used national cancer registry data and CVD databases to describe rates of CVD, comorbidities and social deprivation in patients diagnosed with a potentially curable malignancy (stage I-III breast cancer, stage I-III colon cancer, stage I-III rectal cancer, stage I-III prostate cancer, stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage I-IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, stage I-IV Hodgkin lymphoma) between 2013 and 2018. Outcome measures included observation of CVD prevalence, other comorbidities (evaluated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index) and deprivation (using the Index of Multiple Deprivation) according to tumour site and allocation to Cancer Alliance. Patients were allocated to CVD prevalence tertiles (minimum: <33.3rd percentile; middle: 33.3rd to 66.6th percentile; maximum: >66.6th percentile). RESULTS In total, 634 240 patients with a potentially curable malignancy were eligible. The total CVD prevalence for all cancer sites varied between 13.4% (CVD n = 2058; 95% confidence interval 12.8, 13.9) and 19.6% (CVD n = 7818; 95% confidence interval 19.2, 20.0) between Cancer Alliances. CVD prevalence showed regional variation both for male (16-26%) and female patients (8-16%) towards higher CVD prevalence in northern Cancer Alliances. Similar variation was observed for social deprivation, with the proportion of cancer patients being identified as most deprived varying between 3.3% and 32.2%, depending on Cancer Alliance. The variation between Cancer Alliance for total comorbidities was much smaller. CONCLUSION Social deprivation, CVD and other comorbidities in patients with a potentially curable malignancy in England show significant regional variations, which may partly contribute to differences observed in treatments and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J V Waterhouse
- Breast Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5PT, London, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - C A Welch
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, Leicester, United Kingdom; National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, E14 4PU, London, United Kingdom
| | - N M L Battisti
- Breast Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5PT, London, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - M J Sweeting
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, Leicester, United Kingdom; Statistical Innovation, Oncology Biometrics, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Paley
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, E14 4PU, London, United Kingdom
| | - P C Lambert
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, LE1 7RH, Leicester, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Deanfield
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, 62 Huntley St London, WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom
| | - M de Belder
- National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, NHS Arden & Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, 2nd floor 1 St Martin's le Grand London, EC1A 4AS, United Kingdom
| | - M D Peake
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Rd, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - D Adlam
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom.
| | - A Ring
- Breast Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5PT, London, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:595-602. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
4
|
Rassu PC. Breast surgical oncology in elderly and unfit patients: a systematic review. Minerva Surg 2021; 76:538-549. [PMID: 34935322 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08995-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer treatment in elderly women remains a complex issue due to pre-existing comorbidities, therapy-related toxicities, and the lack of evidence-based data in this population, leading to both overtreatment and undertreatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The aim was to investigate the literature on breast surgical oncology in the older woman as a major therapeutic challenge: the 86 more consistent articles amongst 1440 potential citations according to PRISMA guidelines were retained. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies demonstrated that despite low-grade tumor types, lower incidence of axillary lymph node involvement, ER+ disease, and less aggressive tumor biology, elderly breast cancer patients often receive less than the standard-of-care when compared to their younger counterparts. The surgery omission in elderlies and the preference for the primary endocrine treatment is associated with worse survival, especially in patients aged 80 years or over - a cohort with no specific recommendations concerning breast and axillary surgical procedures. On the other hand, a higher mastectomy rate is still considered the standard treatment in older women with higher T2:T1 tumor ratio and greater difficulties to attend radiotherapy due to severe comorbidities. Surgical de-escalation procedures even in an-ambulatory setting are recognized as a feasible option in these patients to prevent or palliate breast or chest wall symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Benefits and disadvantages from surgery only or coupled with adjuvant therapies for elderly women were analyzed in literature, outlining a growing need for a proper geriatric assessment and short-stay surgical programs which are feasible today owing to the availability of less invasive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier C Rassu
- Department of General Surgery, S. Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, Alessandria, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burton M, Lifford KJ, Wyld L, Armitage F, Ring A, Nettleship A, Collins K, Morgan J, Reed MWR, Holmes GR, Bradburn M, Gath J, Green T, Revell D, Brain K, Edwards A. Process evaluation of the Bridging the Age Gap in Breast Cancer decision support intervention cluster randomised trial. Trials 2021; 22:447. [PMID: 34256828 PMCID: PMC8278730 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05360-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Bridging the Age Gap in Breast Cancer research programme sought to improve treatment decision-making for older women with breast cancer by developing and testing, in a cluster randomised trial (n = 1339 patients), two decision support interventions (DESIs). Both DESIs were used in the intervention arm and each comprised an online risk prediction model, brief decision aid and information booklet. One DESI supported the decision to have either primary endocrine therapy (PET) or surgery with adjuvant therapies and the second supported the decision to have adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery or not. METHODS Sixteen sites were randomly selected to take part in the process evaluation. Multiple methods of data collection were used. Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines for the evaluation of complex interventions were used. RESULTS Eighty-two patients, mean age 75.5 (range 70-93), provided data for the process evaluation. Seventy-three interviews were completed with patients. Ten clinicians from six intervention sites took part in telephone interviews. Dose: Ninety-one members of staff in the intervention arm received intervention training. Reach: The online tool was accessed on 324 occasions by 27 clinicians. Reasons for non-use of the online tool were commonly that the patient had already made a decision or that there was no online access in the clinic. Of the 32 women for whom there were data available, fifteen from the intervention arm and six from the usual care arm were offered a choice of treatment. Fidelity: Clinicians used the online tool in different ways, with some using it during the consultation and others checking the online survival estimates before the consultation. Adaptation: There was evidence of adaptation when using the DESIs. A lack of infrastructure, e.g. internet access, was a barrier to the use of the online tool. The brief decision aid was rarely used. Mediators: Shared decision-making: Most patients felt able to contribute to decision-making and expressed high levels of satisfaction with the process. Participants' responses to intervention: Six patients reported the DESIs to be very useful, one somewhat useful and two moderately useful. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians who participated were mainly supportive of the interventions and had attempted some adaptations to make the interventions applicable, but there were practical and engagement barriers that led to sub-optimal adoption in routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN46099296 . Registered on 11 August 2016-retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Burton
- College of Health, Wellbeing & Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate J Lifford
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Fiona Armitage
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Alistair Ring
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Karen Collins
- College of Health, Wellbeing & Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jenna Morgan
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Malcolm W R Reed
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK
| | - Geoffrey R Holmes
- Department of Health Economics and Decision Science, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, ScHARR, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jacqui Gath
- Yorkshire and Humberside (formerly North Trent Cancer Network) Consumer Research Panel UK, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tracy Green
- Yorkshire and Humberside (formerly North Trent Cancer Network) Consumer Research Panel UK, Sheffield, UK
| | - Deirdre Revell
- Yorkshire and Humberside (formerly North Trent Cancer Network) Consumer Research Panel UK, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| |
Collapse
|