The role of surgical margin quality in myxofibrosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

Clear surgical margins as a prognostic indicator for disease recurrence, with no impact on survival rates in patients with myxofibrosarcoma

Myxofibrosarcoma presents an infiltrating growth pattern that results in a high tendency for local recurrence. Clear margin resection is challenging because of microscopic infiltration. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the overall and disease-free survival rates of patients with myxofibrosarcoma and the prognostic factors that determine both survival and disease recurrence. Among the 111 patients included in our study, the 5-year overall survival rate was 65.5%. An age of more than 65 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.6]; p < 0.001), a tumor size of more than 5 cm (HR 2.8 [95% CI 0.9-8.1]; p = 0.049) and the G3 tumor grade (HR 14.1 [95% CI 2.1-105.0]; p < 0.001) negatively affected overall survival. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 49.4%. R1/R2-type resection (HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.0-5.6]; p = 0.048) had a detrimental effect on tumor recurrence. Clear margins had a positive impact on recurrence-free survival, but did not significantly affect overall patient survival, suggesting that other factors may play a more significant role in determining patient outcomes. A surgical margin of 2 mm was not sufficient to significantly influence the incidence of recurrence. Consequently, a wider surgical margin may be necessary to reduce the risk of myxofibrosarcoma recurrence.

A Two-Step Approach to the Surgical Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Background: Nowadays, limb-sparing procedures are the gold standard in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs. Wide tumor resection with appropriate oncological margins, reconstruction, and stabilization of the involved bone and joint and restoration of the soft tissue lost are essential in order to obtain good clinical and functional outcomes. Tumor excision and soft-tissue reconstruction performed in one-step surgery is chosen by many centers as the preferred approach; however, according to our experience in some selected patients, two-step surgery performed using a dermal regeneration template first and then a margin revision, taking into account the definitive results of the anatomopathological exam conducted over the surgical specimen from the previous surgery, associated with definitive reconstruction surgery over a healthy bed of granulated tissue, showed many potential benefits. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on thirteen patients who underwent a two-step reconstruction procedure using dermal substitution after soft-tissue sarcoma excision. Results: Clinically, the enrolled patients achieved excellent contour and cosmesis of their surgical wounds, with a mean VSS value of 3.07. During the follow-up period, no local recurrences were observed in any patient. Conclusions: Two-step surgery represents the most suitable solution to allow surgical radicality with minimal recurrency and adequate soft-tissue reconstruction, avoiding the possibility of wasting autologous tissue. Our patients generally embraced this approach and the management that followed.

Surgical Margins in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma

» Negative margin resection of musculoskeletal sarcomas is associated with reduced risk of local recurrence.» There is limited evidence to support an absolute margin width of soft tissue or bone that correlates with reduced risk of local recurrence.» Factors intrinsic to the tumor, including histologic subtype, grade, growth pattern and neurovascular involvement impact margin status and local recurrence, and should be considered when evaluating a patient's individual risk after positive margins.» Appropriate use of adjuvant therapy, critical analysis of preoperative advanced cross-sectional imaging, and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team are essential to obtain negative margins when resecting sarcomas.

Analysis of the Peritumoral Tissue Unveils Cellular Changes Associated with a High Risk of Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The management of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) relies on a multidisciplinary approach involving specialized oncological surgery combined with other adjuvant therapies to achieve optimal local disease control. Purpose and Results: Genomic and transcriptomic pseudocapsules of 20 prospective sarcomas were analyzed and revealed to be correlated with a higher risk of recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A peritumoral environment that has been remodeled and infiltrated by M2 macrophages, and is less expressive of healthy tissue, would pose a significant risk of relapse and require more aggressive treatment strategies.

[Multimodal treatment of localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities : Summary and discussion of the current S3 guidelines on adult soft tissue sarcomas and the ESMO guidelines on soft tissue and visceral sarcomas]

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumors that are frequently in the extremities. Treatment includes surgical resection, combination chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, as well as supplementary procedures such as isolated limb perfusion and regional deep hyperthermia. The prognosis depends on the tumor stage and the approximately 70 histological subtypes, with specific treatment approaches existing only for some subtypes. This review summarizes the recommendations of the German S3 guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas" and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline "Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas" regarding the diagnostic workup and therapy of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Oncologic outcomes in myxofibrosarcomas: the role of a multidisciplinary approach and surgical resection margins

BACKGROUNDS

Myxofibrosarcomas (MFS) are malignant soft tissue sarcomas with an infiltrative growth pattern and propensity for local recurrence(LR).We aimed to assess our management of MFS and make recommendations about the role of a multidisciplinary team approach and margin widths.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients were identified with MFS treated at a single sarcoma centre between 1998 and 2020. Patients were stratified based on whether they presented for a planned resection (59.6%) or after an unplanned resection (40.4%) performed at a non-specialized facility. All patients underwent radiotherapy before definitive surgery.

RESULTS

73.7% underwent a combined onco-plastic approach. The 5 year LRFS rate was 78.2% (84.4%, planned, versus 70.1%, unplanned, P = 0.194) and found comparable oncological outcomes between the planned and unplanned groups for the 5 year metastasis free survival (74.5% versus 86.1%, P = 0.257), disease free survival (70.1% versus 72.4%, P = 0.677), and Overall Survival (64.5% versus 75.9%, P = 0.950). Margin width ≥ 2 cm was obtained in 84.2% of cases and improved local control (HR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.81; P = 0.023), metastasis (HR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.80; P = 0.019) and mortality rates (HR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.09, 0.61; P = 0.003) compared to <2 cm. Margin width > 3 cm did not further affect oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that a multidisciplinary team approach allows the achievement of low local recurrence rate and good oncological outcomes of myxofibrosarcomas, regardless of presentation status. We recommend a minimum of 2 cm margin width.

Analysis of prognostic factors in 171 patients with myxofibrosarcoma of the trunk and extremities: a cohort study

Background

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) of the trunk and extremities has unique clinical features. However, it is not clear which indicators are the influencing factors of recurrence, metastasis, and survival of trunk and limb MFS. The aim of the present study was to analyze clinical features and prognosis of trunk and limb MFS.

Methods

The data of 171 patients with MFS of the trunk and extremities and a median follow-up period of 67 months from January 1999 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for survival, recurrence and metastasis following resection of MFS of trunk and extremities were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) was used for the univariate analysis and a Cox regression model was used for the multivariate analysis.

Results

The median age of the patients was 53 years; there were 111 males and 60 females. A total of 132 cases had French Federation of Cancer Centers grade 1, 24 cases had grade 2, and 15 cases had grade 3 MFS. The 3-year recurrence, 3-year metastasis, and 5-year survival rates were 29.2%, 19.3%, and 93.6%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the surgical margin (χ²=22.228, P<0.001) and tumor size (χ²=6.697, P=0.010) were associated with recurrence. The surgical margin (χ²=12.353, P<0.001) and CD44 expression (χ²=5.227, P=0.022) were associated with metastasis. The multivariate analysis showed that the surgical margin [hazard ratio (HR) =3.635, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.883-7.016, P<0.001] and tumor size (HR =1.889, 95% CI: 1.039-3.435, P=0.037) were risk factors for local recurrence. In addition, the surgical margin (HR =4.475, 95% CI: 1.918-10.438, P=0.001) and presence of CD44 (HR =3.406, 95% CI: 1.462-8.405, P=0.005) were risk factors for distant metastasis.

Conclusions

A negative surgical margin can be reduced effectively the rate of recurrence and metastasis in patients with MFS of the trunk and limbs. In addition, CD44 may be used to assess the metastatic risk of patients with MFS.

Margin Assessment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Many classifications to assess margins status for soft tissue sarcomas are reported in the literature. Most of the series are heterogeneous and variable in size, making it difficult to compare results from study to study. Thus, which is the best way to assess margins in order to predict the risk of local recurrence is still debated. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Abstract

Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.

Soft-tissue reconstruction after soft-tissue sarcoma resection: the clinical outcomes of 24 patients

PURPOSE

Pedicle or free-flap reconstruction is important in surgical sarcoma management. Free flaps are indicated only when pedicle flaps are considered inadequate; however, they are associated with a higher risk of flap failure, longer surgical times, and technical difficulty. To determine the skin defect size that can be covered by a pedicle flap, we investigated the clinical outcomes and complications of reconstruction using pedicle flaps vs. free flaps after sarcoma resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the medical records of 24 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas who underwent reconstruction using a pedicle (n = 20) or free flap (n = 4) following wide tumour resection.

RESULTS

All skin defects of the knee, lower leg, and ankle were reconstructed using a pedicle flap. Skin defects of the knee, lower leg, and ankle were covered by up to 525 cm², 325 cm², and 234 cm², respectively. The amount of blood loss was significantly greater in the free-flap group than in the pedicle flap group (p = 0.011). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the pedicle flap group than in the free-flap group (p = 0.006). Total necrosis was observed in one (25%) patient in the free-flap group; no case of total necrosis was observed in the pedicle flap group.

CONCLUSION

Less blood loss, shorter surgical time, and lower risk of total flap necrosis are notable advantages of pedicle flaps over free flaps. Most skin defects, even large ones, of the lower extremities following sarcoma resection can be covered using a single pedicle flap or multiple pedicle flaps.