1
|
Voigt KR, Wullaert L, van Driel MHE, Goudberg M, Doornebosch PG, Schreinemakers JMJ, Verseveld M, Peeters KCMJ, Verhoef C, Husson O, Grünhagen DJ. The association of cognitive coping style with patient preferences in a patient-led follow-up study among colorectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:564. [PMID: 39088088 PMCID: PMC11294378 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08758-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Amidst the rising number of cancer survivors and personnel shortages, optimisation of follow-up strategies is imperative, especially since intensive follow-up does not lead to survival benefits. Understanding patient preferences and identifying the associated patient profiles is crucial. Coping style may be a key determinant in achieving this. Our study aims to evaluate preferences, identify coping styles and their associated factors, and explore the association between coping style and patients' preferences in colorectal cancer (CRC) follow-up. METHODS In a prospective multicentre implementation study, patients completed the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory (TMSI) to determine their coping style. Simultaneously patients choose their follow-up preferences for the CRC trajectory regarding frequency of tumour marker determination, location of blood sampling, and manner of contact. RESULTS A total of 188 patients completed the TMSI questionnaire after inclusion. A more intensive follow-up was preferred by 71.5% of patients. Of all patients, 52.0% had a coping style classified as 'blunting' and 34.0% as 'monitoring'. Variables such as a younger age, female gender, higher educational level, and lower ASA scores were associated with having higher monitoring scores. However, there were no significant associations between follow-up preferences and patients' coping styles. CONCLUSION This study suggests that none of the provided options in a patient-led follow-up are unsuitable for patients who underwent curative surgery for primary CRC, based on coping style determined at baseline. Low-intensity surveillance after curative resection of CRC may, therefore, be suitable for a wide range of patients independent of coping styles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly R Voigt
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Lissa Wullaert
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - M H Elise van Driel
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Max Goudberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pascal G Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel,, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Verseveld
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jackson SR, Yu P, Armany D, Occhipinti S, Chambers S, Leslie S, Patel MI. eHealth literacy in prostate cancer: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108193. [PMID: 38354430 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022226375) aimed to identify the eHealth literacy of men with prostate cancer, and their caregivers. METHODS 8 databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web Of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature sources (e.g. Google Scholar) were searched from inception to December 2023. Articles were included if assessing eHealth/digital literacy of men with prostate cancer, or their carers', and health outcome associations. Formats such as case reports, and review papers were excluded. Records and full texts underwent independent screening and data extraction. Author disagreements were resolved by discussion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise included literature, with narrative synthesis of results. RESULTS 21,581 records were retrieved, with 7 articles satisfying inclusion criteria. A heterogenous field was characterised with lack of modern eHealth literacy measurement tools identified. Results suggest novice eHealth literacy using web 1.0 technologies. Non-validated measures of literacy demonstrate mixed results, while health outcome effects limited in scope and reliability. CONCLUSION Prostate cancer survivors' eHealth literacy levels is likely novice, and requires further investigation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Digital technologies/resources implemented as part of patient communication practices should be vetted for quality, and tailored to patients' eHealth literacy abilities and/or needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Yu
- Department of Urology Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and, Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - David Armany
- Department of Urology Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and, Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Stefano Occhipinti
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, QLD 4122, Australia; Department of English and Communication, International Research Centre for the Advancement of Health Communication, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 40 Edward St, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia; Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia; St Vincent's Health Network, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 145 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and, Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swartjes H, Aarts CJH, Deuning-Smit E, Vromen HAB, de Wilt JHWH, Vos JAM, Custers JAE. Patient experiences with patient-led, home-based follow-up after curative treatment for colorectal cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081655. [PMID: 38367967 PMCID: PMC10875483 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in need of oncological follow-up is growing. As a response, patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) was developed, implemented and assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate how patients experienced PHFU. DESIGN A qualitative study with individual semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed through an inductive, double-coding approach. SETTING A university medical centre in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 12 curatively treated patients with CRC who received PHFU were included after purposive sampling. RESULTS Overall, participants (N=12) were satisfied with PHFU. The time and cost-saving aspects for patient and hospital were evidently valued. PHFU was experienced as a shared effort, but patients felt like the primary responsibility remained in the hospital. Patients mentioned a decreased personal interaction with their healthcare provider (HCP) and felt a higher threshold to ask for help. However, all major questions were still addressed. Patients felt sufficiently competent to interpret their individual test results but experienced difficulty in interpreting repeated increases in carcinoembryonic antigen levels within the normal range. Educational status, age and a complicated disease course were seen as factors limiting the applicability of PHFU, and it was expressed that PHFU should be offered as an alternative instead of a novel standard of care. CONCLUSIONS According to patients, PHFU has great potential. However, PHFU may not be suitable for every CRC patient, and factors such as educational status, age and disease course should be taken into consideration. Patient and HCP have a shared responsibility to help successfully organise PHFU in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Swartjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J H Aarts
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Deuning-Smit
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen A B Vromen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J H W Hans de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Julien A M Vos
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José A E Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Storm M, Morken IM, Austin RC, Nordfonn O, Wathne HB, Urstad KH, Karlsen B, Dalen I, Gjeilo KH, Richardson A, Elwyn G, Bru E, Søreide JA, Kørner H, Mo R, Strömberg A, Lurås H, Husebø AML. Evaluation of the nurse-assisted eHealth intervention 'eHealth@Hospital-2-Home' on self-care by patients with heart failure and colorectal cancer post-hospital discharge: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:18. [PMID: 38178097 PMCID: PMC10768157 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10508-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with heart failure (HF) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are prone to comorbidity, a high rate of readmission, and complex healthcare needs. Self-care for people with HF and CRC after hospitalisation can be challenging, and patients may leave the hospital unprepared to self-manage their disease at home. eHealth solutions may be a beneficial tool to engage patients in self-care. METHODS A randomised controlled trial with an embedded evaluation of intervention engagement and cost-effectiveness will be conducted to investigate the effect of eHealth intervention after hospital discharge on the self-efficacy of self-care. Eligible patients with HF or CRC will be recruited before discharge from two Norwegian university hospitals. The intervention group will use a nurse-assisted intervention-eHealth@Hospital-2-Home-for six weeks. The intervention includes remote monitoring of vital signs; patients' self-reports of symptoms, health and well-being; secure messaging between patients and hospital-based nurse navigators; and access to specific HF and CRC health-related information. The control group will receive routine care. Data collection will take place before the intervention (baseline), at the end of the intervention (Post-1), and at six months (Post-2). The primary outcome will be self-efficacy in self-care. The secondary outcomes will include measures of burden of treatment, health-related quality of life and 30- and 90-day readmissions. Sub-study analyses are planned in the HF patient population with primary outcomes of self-care behaviour and secondary outcomes of medication adherence, and readmission at 30 days, 90 days and 6 months. Patients' and nurse navigators' engagement and experiences with the eHealth intervention and cost-effectiveness will be investigated. Data will be analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. DISCUSSION This protocol will examine the effects of the eHealth@ Hospital-2-Home intervention on self-care in two prevalent patient groups, HF and CRC. It will allow the exploration of a generic framework for an eHealth intervention after hospital discharge, which could be adapted to other patient groups, upscaled, and implemented into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials.gov (ID 301472).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Rosalynn C Austin
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Cardiology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborative (ARC) Wessex, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Oda Nordfonn
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Stord, Norway
| | - Hege Bjøkne Wathne
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Ingvild Dalen
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kari Hanne Gjeilo
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Cardiology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Alison Richardson
- National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaborative (ARC) Wessex, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 11, Clinical Academic Facility (Room AA102), South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Edvin Bru
- Centre for Learning Environment, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rune Mo
- Department of Cardiology, St. Olav's Hospital, and Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anna Strömberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hilde Lurås
- Avdeling for Helsetjenesteforskning (HØKH), Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Husebø ALM, Søreide JA, Kørner H, Storm M, Wathne HB, Richardson A, Morken IM, Urstad KH, Nordfonn OK, Karlsen B. eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients' self-management after discharge from surgery-an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:11. [PMID: 38055087 PMCID: PMC10700211 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) creates elevated self-management demands and unmet support needs post-discharge. Follow-up care through eHealth post-primary surgery may be an effective means of supporting patients' needs. This integrative review describes the evidence regarding eHealth interventions post-hospital discharge focusing on delivery mode, user-interface and content, patient intervention adherence, impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences of eHealth. METHODS A university librarian performed literature searches in 2021 using four databases. After screening 1149 records, the authors read 30 full-text papers and included and extracted data from 26 papers. Two authors analysed the extracted data using the 'framework synthesis approach'. RESULTS The 26 papers were published between 2012 and 2022. The eHealth interventions were mainly delivered by telephone with the assistance of healthcare professionals, combined with text messages or video conferencing. The user interfaces included websites, applications and physical activity (PA) trackers. The interventions comprised the monitoring of symptoms or health behaviours, patient information, education and counselling. Evidence showed a better psychological state and improved PA. Patients reported high satisfaction with eHealth. However, patient adherence was inadequately reported. CONCLUSIONS eHealth interventions may positively impact CRC patients' anxiety and PA regardless of the user interface. Patients prefer technology combined with a human element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Lunde Marie Husebø
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Hege Bjøkne Wathne
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Alison Richardson
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 11, Clinical Academic Facility (Room AA102), South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oda Karin Nordfonn
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Stord, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Swartjes H, Qaderi SM, Teerenstra S, Custers JAE, Elferink MAG, van Wely BJ, Burger JWA, van Grevenstein WMU, van Duijvendijk P, Verdaasdonk EGG, de Roos MAJ, Coupé VMH, Vink GR, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW. Towards patient-led follow-up after curative surgical resection of stage I, II and III colorectal cancer (DISTANCE-trial): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:838. [PMID: 37679735 PMCID: PMC10483744 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11297-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Approximately 20-30% of stage I-III CRC patients develop a recurrent tumour or metastases after curative surgical resection. Post-operative follow-up is indicated for the first five years after curative surgical resection. As intensified follow-up after curative surgical resection has shown no effect on survival, patient organisations and policy makers have advocated for a more patient-centred approach to follow-up. The objective of this study is to successfully implement patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) in six hospitals in The Netherlands, with as ultimate aim to come to a recommendation for a patient-centred follow-up schedule for stage I-III CRC patients treated with surgical resection with curative intent. METHODS This study is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial (SW-CRT) in six participating centres. During the trial, three centres will implement PHFU after six months; the other three centres will implement PHFU after 12 months of inclusion in the control group. Eligible patients are those with pT2-4N0M0 or pT1-4N1-2M0 CRC, who are 18 years or older and have been free of disease for 12 months after curative surgical resection. The studied intervention is PHFU, starting 12 months after curative resection. The in-hospital, standard-of-care follow-up currently implemented in the participating centres functions as the comparator. The proportion of patients who had contact with the hospital regarding CRC follow-up between 12-24 months after curative surgical resection is the primary endpoint of this study. Quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness and survival are the secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION The results of this study will provide evidence on whether nationwide implementation of PHFU for CRC in The Netherlands will be successful in reducing contact between patient and health care provider. Comparison of PROMs between in-hospital follow-up and PHFU will be provided. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of PHFU will be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trail Register (NTR): NL9266 (Registered on January 1st, 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde Swartjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Seyed M Qaderi
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jose A E Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Marnix A J de Roos
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, 6500, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morken IM, Wathne HB, Karlsen B, Storm M, Nordfonn OK, Gjeilo KH, Urstad KH, Søreide JA, Husebø AM. Assessing a nurse-assisted eHealth intervention posthospital discharge in adult patients with non-communicable diseases: a protocol for a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069599. [PMID: 37536967 PMCID: PMC10401255 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A growing number of patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as heart failure (HF) and colorectal cancer (CRC), are prone to comorbidity, a high rate of readmissions and complex healthcare needs. An eHealth intervention, however, could potentially ameliorate the increasing burdens associated with NCDs by helping to smoothen patient transition from hospital to home and by reducing the number of readmissions. This feasibility study therefore aims to assess the feasibility of a nurse-assisted eHealth intervention posthospital discharge among patients with HF and CRC, while also examining the preliminary clinical and behavioural outcomes of the intervention before initiating a full-scale randomised controlled trial. The recruitment ended in January 2023. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Twenty adult patients with HF and 10 adult patients with CRC will be recruited from two university hospitals in Norway. Six hospital-based nurse navigators (NNs) will offer support during the transition phase from hospital to home by using a solution for digital remote care, Dignio Connected Care. The patients will use the MyDignio application uploaded to an iPad for 30 days postdischarge. The interactions between patients and NNs will then be assessed through direct observation and qualitative interviews in line with a think-aloud protocol. Following the intervention, semistructured interviews will be used to explore patients' experiences of eHealth support and NNs' experiences of eHealth delivery. The feasibility testing will also comprise a post-test of the Post-System Usability Questionnaire and pretesting of patient-reported outcomes questionnaires, as well as an inspection of user data collected from the software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (ID.NO: 523386). All participation is based on informed, written consent. The results of the study will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and presented at international and national scientific conferences and meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Department, Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Hege Bjøkne Wathne
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Research Department, Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Oda Karin Nordfonn
- Department of Health and Caring scienses, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Stord, Norway
| | - Kari Hanne Gjeilo
- Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Husebø
- Research Department, Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hovdenak I, Thaysen HV, Bernstein IT, Christensen P, Hauberg A, Iversen LH, Johansen C, Larsen SL, Laurberg S, Madsen AH, Madsen MR, Rasmussen HV, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Juul T. Quality of life and symptom burden after rectal cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial comparing patient-led versus standard follow-up. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01410-4. [PMID: 37395934 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01410-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After curatively intended rectal cancer (RC) surgery, new follow-up strategies are warranted, seeking more individualised care and targeting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes. The FURCA trial aimed to investigate the effect of patient-led follow-up on HRQoL and symptom burden 3 years after surgery. METHODS RC patients from four Danish centres were randomised 1:1 to intervention (patient-led follow-up with patient education and self-referral to a specialist nurse) or control (standard follow-up with five routine doctor visits). Patients in both groups had a computed tomography (CT) at 1 and 3 years. The primary outcome (HRQoL) was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - colorectal (FACT-C) score (Ward et al. in Qual Life Res. 8(3):181-95, 18). Secondary outcomes were functional measures, patient involvement and satisfaction and cancer recurrence at 3 years. RESULTS From Feb 2016 to Aug 2018, 336 patients were included of whom 248 completed 3 years of follow-up. Between-group differences were found neither for the primary endpoint, nor for functional outcomes. The recurrence rate did not differ between the groups. Patient involvement and satisfaction were higher in the intervention group with statistical significance in almost half of the items. CONCLUSIONS We found no effect on HRQoL and symptom burden from patient-led follow-up, although it may improve patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The findings in this study suggest that patient-led follow-up is a more tailored approach to meet cancer survivors' needs and might improve their ability to cope with survivorship. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER R97-A6511-14-S23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Hovdenak
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Henriette Vind Thaysen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Inge Thomsen Bernstein
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ann Hauberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lene Hjerrild Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Late Effect Research Unit, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susie Lindhardt Larsen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Anders Husted Madsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Mogens Rørbæk Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Helle Vindfeldt Rasmussen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Cancer Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
'It made me feel part of the team, having my homework to do' - women and specialist nurse experiences of remote follow-up after ovarian cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:2. [PMID: 36512093 PMCID: PMC9745768 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07470-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian cancer patients require monitoring for relapse post-treatment, and alternative follow-up pathways are increasing, which require in-depth exploration to ensure acceptability and inform implementation. This study aimed to explore women and specialist nurses' experiences of participating in a feasibility study of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up pathway after ovarian cancer treatment. METHODS The feasibility study incorporated an ePRO questionnaire, blood test and telephone consultation with a specialist nurse, instead of face-to-face hospital visits. All women and the nurses involved were invited to take part in nested semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcripts analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS Twenty interviews were conducted (16 out of 24 women who took part in the feasibility study and all 4 nurses). Four themes were identified: (1) readiness and motivators, (2) practicalities and logistics, (3) personal impact and (4) future role. An overarching theme highlighted how women strived to seek reassurance and gain confidence. Most women and nurses were positive about the ePRO pathway and would happily continue using it. CONCLUSION This work provides invaluable insight into the experiences of women on remote ePRO follow-up post-treatment. Important logistic and implementation issues were identified, which should inform future large-scale work to introduce and evaluate remote ePRO methods in cancer follow-up. This work highlights the key factors influencing women's readiness and acceptability of an ePRO pathway, and how services should be carefully designed to ensure patients feel reassured and confident post-treatment. Furthermore, it highlights that flexibility and patient preference should be considered in remote service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02847715 (first registered 19 May 2016).
Collapse
|
10
|
Kennedy F, Shearsmith L, Holmes M, Rogers Z, Carter R, Hofmann U, Velikova G. Electronic patient-reported monitoring of symptoms during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:726. [PMID: 35780095 PMCID: PMC9250717 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09817-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer patients require monitoring for relapse. Innovative follow-up methods are increasingly being explored. An electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up pathway was developed for women treated for ovarian cancer. This feasibility study explored patient acceptability and compliance. Methods A single-arm non-blinded prospective feasibility study was undertaken at two hospitals. Participants were women who had completed treatment for ovarian cancer whose clinician was happy for them to be monitored remotely. Automated 3-monthly reminders were sent to participants to complete an ePRO questionnaire and obtain blood tests. Participants were reviewed over the phone by their clinical nurse specialist instead of attending clinic-based follow-up. The primary outcome was compliance (expected ePRO completions/blood tests) across the 12-month study period. Secondary outcomes were recruitment, attrition, resource use, symptom severity/alerts and patient acceptability. Results Twenty-four women consented (50% consent rate), and 13 remained on study at 12 months. Seven women relapsed, 3 chose to withdraw, and 1 withdrew for other clinical reasons. ePRO compliance was high and consistent at 75-82%, although the two hospitals differed. Adherence to the clinical protocol was evident for blood tests and contacts with staff (fewer visits, more phonecalls compared to an earlier audit). End-of-study feedback indicated high patient satisfaction. Conclusions Remote ePRO follow-up for ovarian cancer is feasible and acceptable to patients who are able and willing to participate. However, the low recruitment rate (ineligible + declined) indicate it is not suitable/acceptable to all patients immediately post-treatment. Further large-scale research and implementation work is required, especially in a post-COVID era. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02847715 (first registered 19/05/2016). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09817-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Kennedy
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - Leanne Shearsmith
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Marie Holmes
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Zoe Rogers
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Rob Carter
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Uschi Hofmann
- Calderdale & Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Acre St, Lindley, Huddersfield, HD3 3EA, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Section of Patient Centred Outcomes Research, Patient Reported Outcomes Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hawranek C, Maxon J, Andersson A, Van Guelpen B, Hajdarevic S, Numan Hellquist B, Rosén A. Cancer Worry Distribution and Willingness to Undergo Colonoscopy at Three Levels of Hypothetical Cancer Risk—A Population-Based Survey in Sweden. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040918. [PMID: 35205668 PMCID: PMC8870195 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer worry is a known health concern in cancer patients and people with a genetic predisposition to cancer. We measured how worried people, in general, are about developing cancer to describe levels in non-affected individuals. In total, 943 respondents completed a survey containing the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and hypothetical questions asking if they would attend a colonoscopy screening at a 5, 10, or 70 percent lifetime risk of developing bowel cancer. Unaffected individuals scored a mean of 9.46 on the six-item CWS. Women scored significantly higher than men (9.91 vs. 9.06). Women and parents had higher cancer worry than men and people without children when ruling out differences in education, age, and country of birth. People who worried more were also more inclined to undergo a colonoscopy screening, and intention increased with higher levels of hypothetical risk. These data may be helpful in future work on cancer worry and cancer prevention. Abstract Purpose: We describe levels of cancer worry in the general population as measured with the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and investigate the association with colonoscopy screening intentions in three colorectal cancer risk scenarios. Methods: The data were sourced through a population-based survey. Respondents (n = 943) completed an eight-item CWS and questions on colonoscopy screening interest at three hypothetical risk levels. Results: Respondents without a personal cancer history (n = 853) scored 9.46 on the six-item CWS (mean, SD 2.72). Mean scores were significantly higher in women (9.91, SD 2.89) as compared to men (9.06, SD 2.49, p < 0.001). Linear regression showed higher cancer worry in women and those with children when controlling for education, age group, and country of birth. High cancer worry (six-item CWS mean >12) was identified in 25% of women and in 17% of men. Among those, 71% would attend a colonoscopy screening compared to 52% of those with low cancer worry (p < 0.001, 5% CRC-risk). Conclusions: The distribution of cancer worry in a general population sample showed higher mean scores in women, and levels overlapped with earlier findings in cancer-affected samples. Respondents with high cancer worry were more inclined to undergo a colonoscopy screening, and intention increased with higher levels of hypothetical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Hawranek
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-76-69-60-648
| | - Johan Maxon
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Andreas Andersson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Bethany Van Guelpen
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Senada Hajdarevic
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden;
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Barbro Numan Hellquist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Anna Rosén
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; (J.M.); (A.A.); (B.V.G.); (B.N.H.); (A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kennedy F, Shearsmith L, Holmes M, Peacock R, Lindner OC, Megson M, Velikova G. 'We do need to keep some human touch'-Patient and clinician experiences of ovarian cancer follow-up and the potential for an electronic patient-reported outcome pathway: A qualitative interview study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13557. [PMID: 35146821 PMCID: PMC9287040 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore experiences of follow‐up after treatment and views on an electronic patient‐reported outcome (ePRO) pathway among ovarian cancer patients and clinicians. Methods Semi‐structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians and patients previously treated for ovarian cancer. Interviews explored experiences of the current follow‐up pathway, patients' needs and views on an ePRO pathway enabling patients to report symptoms online rather than attend clinic‐based appointments. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. Results Sixteen patients and 10 clinicians participated from four hospitals in England. Four key themes were identified: transition into follow‐up, key features of effective follow‐up, issues in follow‐up and views of ePRO. Both patients and clinicians saw benefits of an ePRO pathway alongside continued access to specialist support and discussed various practicalities (e.g., frequency, introduction and communication). Technology concerns and feelings of abandonment were highlighted as barriers. The proposed impact on clinical and individual patient outcomes was discussed. Conclusion Patient and clinician views on follow‐up and an ePRO pathway informed key recommendations on the development/introduction of ePRO follow‐up. Technology use in healthcare will continue to grow and may offer solutions to facilitate responsive and tailored care. Further research should explore the safety, experiences and acceptability of ePRO follow‐up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Kennedy
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Leanne Shearsmith
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marie Holmes
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rosemary Peacock
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Oana C Lindner
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Molly Megson
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hovdenak Jakobsen I, Vind Thaysen H, Laurberg S, Johansen C, Juul T. Patient-led follow-up reduces outpatient doctor visits and improves patient satisfaction. One-year analysis of secondary outcomes in the randomised trial Follow-Up after Rectal CAncer (FURCA). Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1130-1139. [PMID: 34238100 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1950924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND FURCA (Follow-Up after Rectal Cancer) is a multi-centre randomised trial comparing patient-led follow-up with standard outpatient follow-up. This paper reports one-year follow-up data from the FURCA trial on selected secondary outcomes including type and number of contacts, patient-reported involvement and satisfaction with health care services during follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with rectal cancer (stage < IV) from four Danish surgical centres were randomised (1:1) into intervention (education and self-referral to project nurse) or standard follow-up (routine clinical doctor visits). The present analysis involved data on hospital contacts during the first year after surgery, patient involvement and satisfaction measured at one year, and baseline patient-reported and clinical variables. RESULTS Of 512 eligible patients, 168 were allocated to patient-led follow-up (intervention) and 168 to standard follow-up (control). The total number of hospital contacts in the intervention arm did not differ significantly from the number of contacts in the control arm (p = 0.44). More patients had ≥15 contacts in the intervention arm than in the control arm (p = 0.004). The total number of outpatient doctor visits was significantly lower in the intervention arm (p < 0.001). Patients in both arms rated involvement and satisfaction high; yet patients in the intervention arm scored significantly higher on two of six items regarding involvement and all five items regarding satisfaction. Of the 168 patients in the intervention arm, 43% made direct contact (self-referral) to the project nurse, and 14 of these patients (8%) had ≥4 contacts. The primary reason for self-referral was bowel dysfunction. DISCUSSION The findings indicate the value of a patient-led follow-up program in terms of direct access and more individually tailored intervention based on patients' needs, with most tasks being managed by nurses. Patient-led follow-up came with improved patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction; thus, it was both acceptable and favourable for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Late Effect Research Unit, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Qaderi SM, Galjart B, Verhoef C, Slooter GD, Koopman M, Verhoeven RHA, de Wilt JHW, van Erning FN. Disease recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery in the modern era: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:2399-2410. [PMID: 33813606 PMCID: PMC8505312 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03914-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This population-based study determined the cumulative incidence (CI) of local, regional, and distant recurrences, examined metastatic patterns, and identified risk factors for recurrence after curative treatment for CRC. METHODS All patients undergoing resection for pathological stage I-III CRC between January 2015 and July 2015 and registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry were selected (N = 5412). Additional patient record review and data collection on recurrences was conducted by trained administrators in 2019. Three-year CI of recurrence was calculated according to sublocation (right-sided: RCC, left-sided: LCC and rectal cancer: RC) and stage. Cox competing risk regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS The 3-year CI of recurrence for stage I, II, and III RCC and LCC was 0.03 vs. 0.03, 0.12 vs. 0.16, and 0.31 vs. 0.24, respectively. The 3-year CI of recurrence for stage I, II, and III RC was 0.08, 0.24, and 0.38. Distant metastases were found in 14, 12, and 16% of patients with RCC, LCC, and RC. Multiple site metastases were found often in patients with RCC, LCC, and RC (42 vs. 32 vs. 28%). Risk factors for recurrence in stage I-II CRC were age 65-74 years, pT4 tumor size, and poor tumor differentiation whereas in stage III CRC, these were ASA III, pT4 tumor size, N2, and poor tumor differentiation. CONCLUSIONS Recurrence rates in recently treated patients with CRC were lower than reported in the literature and the metastatic pattern and recurrence risks varied between anatomical sublocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed M. Qaderi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ,Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D. Slooter
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert H. A. Verhoeven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ,Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H. W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Felice N. van Erning
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|