Assessment of peritoneal metastases with DW-MRI, CT, and FDG PET/CT before cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies form the evidence base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration-approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines.This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Impact of gated FDG PET/CT on the staging of patients with suspected or proven newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: results from a non-randomized, phase II clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Imaging for staging ovarian cancer is important to determine the extent of disease. The primary objective of this study was to compare gated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and standard CT scan with intravenous contrast to diagnose thoracic involvement in patients with advanced ovarian cancer prior to treatment. The secondary objective was to estimate changes in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and clinical management resulting from gated PET/CT.

METHODS

The IMAGE trial is a non-randomized phase II clinical trial comparing standard CT scanning with gated PET/CT in diagnosing thoracic involvement in a non-selected group of patients with suspected ovarian cancer on a contrast CT scan. Three sets of PET images were obtained comprising an ungated 2 min whole body image, a static 7.5 min image of the upper abdomen and thorax, and a gated end-expiratory image over the upper abdomen and thorax. Images were evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and the proportion of patients with changes in FIGO stage and subsequent clinical management was compared between imaging techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled based on a standard CT scan, 67 of whom were eligible for gated PET/CT scans. Diagnostic accuracy with gated PET/CT was more than 80% for lesions in lung, liver, extra-abdominal sites, and pleura, but less than 50% for extra-abdominal lymph nodes. Compared with CT scan at baseline, 46% of patients who had 7.5 min gated PET/CT had disease upstaged from stage III to IV, and 8% had disease downstaged from stage IV to III. However, this led to a change of management in only 5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Gated PET/CT enables upstaging; however, in our institution it altered clinical management only in a minority of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02258165.

68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT: a head-to-head comparison for peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnostic accuracy

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 (68Ga-FAPI) and 18F-FDG PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients with various types of cancer.

METHODS

The study enrolled 113 patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, each of whom underwent 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Lesions in all patients were confirmed through pathology or radiological follow-up. The evaluation and comparison of diagnostic performance, visual scores, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score were conducted.

RESULTS

Compared to 18F-FDG, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT presented higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for detecting PC on a patient-level (100% vs. 93.2%, 100% vs. 22.22% and 93.81% vs. 86.73%, respectively). Semi-quantitative evaluation revealed that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT had significantly higher SUVmax and TBR for PC [(6.06 ± 3.04 vs. 4.82 ± 2.75, P = 0.001) and (8.50 ± 5.01 vs. 2.92 ± 1.67, P < 0.001)]. The PCI-FAPI score for PC was higher than the PCI-FDG score (11.28 ± 7.10 vs. 5.69 ± 5.15, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-FAPI has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting PC with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Additionally, 68Ga-FAPI has shown significantly higher uptake and PCI score in PC compared to 18F-FDG, indicating its potential importance in clinical.

Assessing the Value of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Gastric Mucinous Adenocarcinoma or Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma

Purpose To investigate the clinical impact and prognostic value of gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT in gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). Materials and Methods Eighty-six participants with newly diagnosed or recurrent gastric MAC or SRCC were prospectively enrolled from April 2021 to October 2021 and underwent both fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two scans in primary and metastatic tumors were evaluated using the McNemar test. Changes of treatment strategies were recorded to compare the treatment management value of the two PET/CT scans. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) were recorded for survival analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval from the date of PET/CT scans to the date of disease progression. Results Eighty-six participants (median age, 62 years [IQR, 45-78 years]; 49 female) were evaluated. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed higher diagnostic accuracy in detecting involved lymph nodes (87% [212 of 244] vs 71% [173 of 244], P < .001) and peritoneal metastases (96% [70 of 73] vs 55% [40 of 73], P < .001) than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Twenty-six participants (30% [26 of 86]) had treatment changes due to more accurate diagnosis with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. Additionally, the 68Ga-FAPI PCI was an independent predictor for PFS (hazard ratio, 6.9; 95% CI: 2.1, 23.1; P = .002). Conclusion 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT had higher accuracy in diagnosis of gastric MAC/SRCC compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT and demonstrated the potential to improve treatment strategies and predict prognosis. Keywords: PET/CT, Mucinous Adenocarcinoma, Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma, Oncology, Abdomen/GI, Molecular Imaging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Surgical evidence-based comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and MRI-DWI for assisting debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients

PURPOSE

Imaging assessment of abdominopelvic tumor burden is crucial for debulking surgery decision in ovarian cancer patients. This study aims to compare the efficiency of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 FAPI PET and MRI-DWI in the preoperative evaluation and its potential impact to debulking surgery decision.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with suspected/confirmed ovarian cancer were enrolled and underwent integrated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MRI. Nineteen patients (15 stage III-IV and 4 I-II stage) who underwent debulking surgery were involved in the diagnostic efficiency analysis. The images of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and MRI-DWI were visually analyzed respectively. Immunohistochemistry on FAP was performed in metastatic lesions to investigate the radiological missing of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET as well as its different performance in primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) patients. Potential imaging impact on management was also studied in 35 confirmed ovarian cancer patients.

RESULTS

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET displayed higher sensitivity (76.8% vs.59.9%), higher accuracy (84.9% vs. 80.7%), and lower missing rate (23.2% vs. 40.1%) than MRI-DWI in detecting abdominopelvic metastasis. The diagnostic superiority of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET is more obvious in PDS patients but diminished in IDS patients. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET outperformed MRI-DWI in 70.8% abdominopelvic regions (17/24), which contained seven key regions that impact the resectability and surgical complexity. MRI-DWI hold advantage in the peritoneal surface of the bladder and the central tendon of the diaphragm. Of the contradictory judgments between the two modalities (14.9%), [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET correctly identified more lesions, particularly in PDS patients (73.8%). In addition, FAP expression was independent of lesion size and decreased in IDS patients. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET changed 42% of surgical planning that was previously based on MRI-DWI.

CONCLUSION

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET is more efficient in assisting debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients than MRI-DWI. Integrated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging is a potential method for planning debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients.

Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Malignant Gynecological Origin: A Systematic Review of Imaging Assessment

This systematic review, conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, aims to comprehensively assess the current state of the art of imaging modalities for the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from malignant gynecological origins, with a focus on ovarian and endometrial cancers. A systematic search of relevant databases was performed, adhering to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies reporting the use of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), PET/CT, and PET/MRI in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gynecological malignancies were included. The review encompasses an overview of selected studies, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality in diagnosing and characterizing peritoneal carcinomatosis. Overall, a wide variability in the reported accuracy of different imaging techniques emerges from literature, mainly due to the type of the study, technical issues, and patient characteristics. Although a meta-analysis could not be performed due to a scarcity of data, this systematic review provides valuable insights into the several imaging approaches used in peritoneal carcinomatosis of gynecological origin. The findings aim to inform clinical decision making and guide future research endeavors in this critical aspect of gynecological oncology.

Predicting incomplete cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Purpose

The most important prognostic factor for survival in ovarian cancer patients is complete cytoreduction. The preoperative prediction of suboptimal cytoreduction, considered as any residual disease at the end of surgery, could prevent futile surgery and morbidity. Here, we aimed to identify markers in the preoperative abdominal CT scans of an unselected cohort of patients with ovarian cancer that are predictive of incomplete cytoreduction.

Methods

This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of 105 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated with surgical cytoreduction between 2010 and 2020. Twenty-two variables on preoperative abdominal CT scans were compared to the intraoperative macroscopic findings by Fisher's exact test. Parameters with a significant correlation between intraoperative findings and imaging were analyzed by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis regarding the surgical outcome of complete versus incomplete cytoreduction.

Results

Complete cytoreduction (CC), indicated by the absence of macroscopic residual disease, was achieved in 79 (75.2%) of 105 patients and 46 (63.9%) of 72 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV patients. Twenty patients (19%) were incompletely cytoreduced due to miliary carcinomatosis of the small bowel, and six patients (5.7%) had various locations of residual disease. Thirteen variables showed a significant correlation between imaging and surgical findings. Large-volume ascites, absence of numerically increased small lymph nodes at the mesenteric root, and carcinomatosis of the transverse colon in FIGO stage III and IV patients decreased the rate of CC to 26.7% in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Large-volume ascites, the absence of numerically increased small lymph nodes at the mesenteric root, and carcinomatosis of the transverse colon are markers in preoperative CT scans predicting a low chance for complete cytoreduction in unselected ovarian cancer patients in a real-world setting.

Spectral CT in peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: a tool for differential diagnosis of small nodules?

The detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with ovarian cancer is crucial to establish the correct therapeutic planning (debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy).

Often, however, the nodules of peritoneal carcinomatosis are very small in size or have a reticular appearance that can mimic the fat stranding that is typical of acute inflammation conditions. Our hypothesis is that the use of dual-layer spectral computed tomography with its applications, such as virtual monoenergetic imaging and Z-effective imaging, might improve the detection and the characterisation of peritoneal nodules, increasing sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy, as recently described for other oncological diseases.

Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, in line with advances in the management of most abdominopelvic metastatic diseases, considerable progress has been made over the past decade. An improved understanding of disease biology has led to the more accurate prediction of neoplasia aggressiveness and the treatment response and has been reflected in the proposal of new classification systems. Achieving complete cytoreductive surgery remains the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment of PSMs. Alongside centralization in expert centres, enabling the delivery of multimodal and multidisciplinary strategies, preoperative management is a crucial step in order to select patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Depending on the specific PSM, the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and of perioperative systemic chemotherapy, in particular, in the neoadjuvant setting, is established in certain scenarios but questioned in several others, although more prospective data are required. In this Review, we describe advances in all aspects of the management of PSMs including disease biology, assessment and improvement of disease resectability, perioperative management, systemic therapy and pre-emptive management, and we speculate on future research directions.

Prospective Comparison of the Performance of MRI Versus CT in the Detection and Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

Background: The performance of MRI versus CT in the detection and evaluation of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) remains unclear in the current literature. Our study is the first prospective study in an Asian center comparing the two imaging modalities, validated against intra-operative findings. Methods: A total of 36 patients with PSM eligible for CRS-HIPEC underwent both MRI and CT scans up to 6 weeks before the operation. The scans were assessed for the presence and distribution of PSM and scored using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), which were compared against PCI determined at surgery. Results: Both MRI and CT were 100% sensitive and specific in detecting the overall presence of PSM. Across all peritoneal regions, the sensitivity and specificity for PSM detection was 49.1% and 93.0% for MRI, compared to 47.8% and 95.1% for CT (p = 0.76). MRI was more sensitive than CT for small bowel disease, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Comparing PCI on imaging with intra-operative PCI, the mean difference was found to be −3.4 ± 5.4 (p < 0.01) for MRI, and −3.9 ± 4.1 (p < 0.01) for CT. The correlation between imaging and intra-operative PCI was poor, with a concordance coefficient of 0.76 and 0.79 for MRI and CT, respectively. Within individual peritoneal regions, there was also poor agreement between imaging and intra-operative PCI for both modalities, other than in regions 1 and 3. Conclusion: MRI and CT are comparable in the detection and evaluation of PSM. While sensitive in the overall detection of PSM, they are likely to underestimate the true disease burden.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT), a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan provides information to allow better visualization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies for PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fourth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies.

Abstract

Concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is an advanced imaging modality with diverse oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and longitudinal surveillance. This series of six review articles focuses on providing practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use and interpretative strategies of PET-CT for oncologic indications in adult patients. In this fourth article of the series, the more common gynecological and adult genitourinary malignancies encountered in clinical practice are addressed, with an emphasis on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals. The advent of new FDA-approved radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer imaging has revolutionized PET-CT imaging in this important disease, and these are addressed in this report. However, [¹⁸F]F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) remains the mainstay for PET-CT imaging of gynecologic and many other genitourinary malignancies. This information will serve as a guide for the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of gynecologic and genitourinary cancer patients for health care professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides guidance in the accurate interpretation of FDG PET-CT in gynecological and genitourinary malignancies for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics

Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.