How to treat liposarcomas located in retroperitoneum

Local Control in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare heterogeneous group of tumors made up of over 100 histologic types and subtypes. Expert pathology review is crucial to confirm the correct diagnosis prior to treatment. Multidisciplinary discussion and management at an expert center is strongly recommended given the many nuances of treatment. Wide resection +/- preoperative radiotherapy is recommended in most extremity and trunk wall STS patients, while a minority may also require perioperative medical therapy. Macroscopic complete resection remains the standard of care for retroperitoneal sarcoma patients, with preoperative radiotherapy recommended in selected histologic types.

Feasibility and safety study of ultra-hypofractionated neoadjuvant radiotherapy to margins-at-risk in retroperitoneal sarcoma

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors that present unique challenges, often due to late presentation, and the proximity of critical organs makes complete surgical resection challenging. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) targeting margins-at-risk and to assess its potential impact on outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, non-randomized feasibility study. SCRT was administered via image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy, consisting of 5 fractions of daily radiotherapy followed by immediate surgery. As a starting dose, patients were prescribed 25 Gy in 5 fractions. For the escalation stage, patients were prescribed 30 Gy in 5 fractions. Only the presumed threatened surgical margins were delineated for large tumors.

RESULTS

Patients with either primary or recurrent RPS were recruited. Eight patients underwent SCRT but one patient did not have a resection as planned. Seven patients underwent surgical resection, of whom one passed away 3 months postoperative from a cardiac event. After a median follow-up of 20.5 months for the six postoperative survivors, there were no overt long-term toxicities and one patient relapsed out-of-radiotherapy-field.

CONCLUSION

SCRT to RPS with a margin boost followed by immediate surgery is worth investigating. A starting dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions is recommended for further studies. Longer-term follow-up is necessary.

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI): A More Promising Nutritional Predictor for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma

Background

Extended surgery with multi-visceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). Malnutrition tends to result in increased surgical complications and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic role of nutritional status in patients with RLPS.

Patients and methods

Data from 189 consecutive patients with RLPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following nutritional parameters were calculated: nutritional risk index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic utility of nutritional indicators. The associations between nutritional indicators and major complications, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

Results

Based on the time-ROC curve analysis, the PNI was superior to other nutritional indices at predicting OS. The optimal cut-off value of PNI was 41.2. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Patients in the low PNI group (< 41.2) had significantly shorter LRFS and OS than those in the high PNI (≥ 41.2) group, with higher major morbidity and mortality rates. The PNI was found to be a unique nutritional predictor that independently predicted LRFS and OS in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The PNI is an effective tool for nutritional assessment in patients with RLPS. A low PNI value in patients with RLPS predicts worse survival outcomes.

Surgical outcomes of major vascular resection for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high‑volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Radical resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) may necessitate vascular resection and reconstruction. The study was conducted to assess surgical outcomes of surgery for RLPS with major vascular involvement.

METHODS

Patients with RLPS who underwent surgical resection at the Sarcoma Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital between April 2011 and December 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were classified into two groups: vascular resection and non-vascular resection groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to eliminate baseline differences between the groups. Surgical details and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Furthermore, prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 199 patients were identified and the median follow-up period was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 45-69) months. Vascular resection was performed in 42 (21%) patients, 25 of whom had vascular infiltration. A total of 39 patients had vascular replacement and 3 patients underwent partial resection (side-wall resection). Vascular resection was burdened by higher rates of major morbidity (38% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.005). After propensity-matched analysis, patients who underwent vascular resection had 5-year LRFS and OS rates comparable to those without vascular involvement. Major vascular resection was not an independent risk factor for LRFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although accompanied by increased risks of major morbidity and mortality, the major vascular resection enabled radical resection in patients with advanced RLPS, affording comparable 5-year LRFS and OS rates compared to those who did not.

Short- and long-term post-nephrectomy outcomes for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high-volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Multivisceral en bloc resection with the ipsilateral kidney is commonly performed in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). We evaluated the effect of nephrectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RLPS.

METHODS

Data from a prospectively maintained database of the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were analyzed. We classified the RLPS patients who underwent surgery into nephrectomy group (NP) and non-nephrectomy group (non-NP). Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Postoperative renal function outcomes, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed to compare short-term outcomes after nephrectomy. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to oncological benefits.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, patients in the NP group had significantly higher postoperative eGFR and CKD stages, but none required dialysis. Patients between NP and non-NP had a comparable major morbidity (p = 0.820) and 60-day mortality (p = 0.475). Patients in the NP group had a higher 5-year LRFS rates than those in the non-NP group (34.5 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015), and similar 5-year OS rates (52.4 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.401). Nephrectomy was an independent risk factor for LRFS, but not for major morbidity or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

RLPS resection with nephrectomy is related to a mild progression of renal impairment; however, dialysis is rare. En bloc nephrectomy for complete resection of RLPS is safe and improves local control.

New trends in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma: The role of preoperative biopsy

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) accounts for 1% of all malignant neoplasms in adults. Their diagnosis and management constitute a challenging target. They originate from the mesenchyme, and 50 subtypes with various cytogenetic profiles concerning soft tissue and bones have been recognized. These tumors mainly affect middle-aged adults but may be present at any age. Half of the patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and require systemic therapy. Tumors above 3-5 cm in size must be suspected of potential malignancy. A thorough history, clinical examination and imaging that must precede biopsy are necessary. Modern imaging techniques include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/CT. MRI findings may distinguish low-grade from high-grade STS based on a diagnostic score (tumor heterogeneity, intratumoral and peritumoral enhancement). A score ≥ 2 indicates a high-grade lesion, and a score ≤ 1 indicates a low-grade lesion. For disease staging, abdominal imaging is recommended to detect early abdominal or retroperitoneal metastases. Liquid biopsy by detecting genomic material in serum is a novel diagnostic tool. A preoperative biopsy is necessary for diagnosis, prognosis and optimal planning of surgical intervention. Core needle biopsy is the most indicative and effective. Its correct performance influences surgical management. An unsuccessful biopsy means the dissemination of cancer cells into healthy anatomical structures that ultimately affect resectability and survival. Complete therapeutic excision (R0) with an acceptable resection margin of 1 cm is the method of choice. However, near significant structures, i.e., vessels, nerves, an R2 resection (macroscopic margin involvement) preserving functionality but having a risk of local recurrence can be an acceptable choice, after informing the patient, to prevent an unavoidable amputation. For borderline resectability of the tumor, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy has a place. Likewise, after surgical excision, adjuvant therapy is indicated, but chemotherapy in nonmetastatic disease is still debatable. The five-year survival rate reaches up to 55%. Reresection is considered after positive or uncertain resection margins. Current strategies are based on novel chemotherapeutic agents, improved radiotherapy applications to limit local side effects and targeted biological therapy or immunotherapy, including vaccines. Young age is a risk factor for distant metastasis within 6 mo following primary tumor resection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy lasting 5-6 wk and surgical resection are indicated for high-grade STS (grade 2 or 3). Wide surgical excision alone may be acceptable for patients older than 70 years. However, locally advanced disease requires a multidisciplinary task of decision-making for amputation or limb salvage.

The Immune Contexture of Liposarcoma and Its Clinical Implications

Liposarcomas (LPS) are the most frequent malignancies in the soft tissue sarcoma family and consist of five distinctive histological subtypes, termed well-differentiated LPS, dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), myxoid LPS (MLPS), pleomorphic LPS, and myxoid pleomorphic LPS. They display variations in genetic alterations, clinical behavior, and prognostic course. While accumulating evidence implicates a crucial role of the tumor immune contexture in shaping the response to anticancer treatments, the immunological landscape of LPS is highly variable across different subtypes. Thus, DDLPS is characterized by a higher abundance of infiltrating T cells, yet the opposite was reported for MLPS. Interestingly, a recent study indicated that the frequency of pre-existing T cells in soft tissue sarcomas has a predictive value for immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. Additionally, B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures were identified as potential biomarkers for the clinical outcome of LPS patients and response to CPI therapy. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that macrophages, predominantly of M2 polarization, are frequently associated with poor prognosis. An improved understanding of the complex LPS immune contexture enables the design and refinement of novel immunotherapeutic approaches. Here, we summarize recent studies focusing on the clinicopathological, genetic, and immunological determinants of LPS.