1
|
Steffens D, Solomon M, Young J, Beckenkamp PR, Bartyn J, Koh C, Hancock M. A review of patient recruitment in randomised controlled trials of preoperative exercise. Clin Trials 2024; 21:371-380. [PMID: 38149306 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231219270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention, as the only method of decreasing section bias and minimising random error. However, participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials is a major challenge, with many trials failing to recruit the targeted sample size accordingly to the planned protocol. Thus, the aim of this review is to detail the recruitment challenges of preoperative exercise clinical trials. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to July 2021. Randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise on postoperative complication and/or length of hospital stay in adult cancer patients were included. Main outcomes included recruitment rate, retention rate, number of days needed to screen and recruit one patient and trial recruitment duration. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 27 trials were identified, including 3656 patients screened (N = 21) and 1414 randomised (median recruitment rate (interquartile range) = 53.6% (25.2%-67.6%), N = 21). The sample size of the included trials ranged from 19 to 270 (median = 48.0; interquartile range = 40.0-85.0) and the duration of trial recruitment ranged from 3 to 50 months (median = 19.0 months; interquartile range = 10.5-34.0). Overall, a median of 3.6 days was needed to screen one patient, whereas 13.7 days were needed to randomise one participant. Over the trials duration, the median dropout rate was 7.9%. Variations in recruitment outcomes were observed across trials of different cancer types but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The recruitment of participants to preoperative exercise randomised controlled trials is challenging, but patient retention appears to be less of a problem. Future trials investigating the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise programme following cancer surgery should consider the time taken to recruit patients. Strategies associated with improved recruitment should be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula R Beckenkamp
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenna Bartyn
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Hancock
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raichurkar P, Denehy L, Solomon M, Koh C, Pillinger N, Hogan S, McBride K, Carey S, Bartyn J, Hirst N, Steffens D. Research Priorities in Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: An International Delphi Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7226-7235. [PMID: 37620526 PMCID: PMC10562336 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14192-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the number of prehabilitation trials has increased significantly. The identification of key research priorities is vital in guiding future research directions. Thus, the aim of this collaborative study was to define key research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS The Delphi methodology was implemented over three rounds of surveys distributed to prehabilitation experts from across multiple specialties, tumour streams and countries via a secure online platform. In the first round, participants were asked to provide baseline demographics and to identify five top prehabilitation research priorities. In successive rounds, participants were asked to rank research priorities on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered if > 70% of participants indicated agreement on each research priority. RESULTS A total of 165 prehabilitation experts participated, including medical doctors, physiotherapists, dieticians, nurses, and academics across four continents. The first round identified 446 research priorities, collated within 75 unique research questions. Over two successive rounds, a list of 10 research priorities reached international consensus of importance. These included the efficacy of prehabilitation on varied postoperative outcomes, benefit to specific patient groups, ideal programme composition, cost efficacy, enhancing compliance and adherence, effect during neoadjuvant therapies, and modes of delivery. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative international study identified the top 10 research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. The identified priorities inform research strategies, provide future directions for prehabilitation research, support resource allocation and enhance the prehabilitation evidence base in cancer patients undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Raichurkar
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linda Denehy
- Department of Health Services Research: Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Neil Pillinger
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sophie Hogan
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate McBride
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenna Bartyn
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hirst
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steffens D, Denehy L, Solomon M, Koh C, Ansari N, McBride K, Carey S, Bartyn J, Lawrence AS, Sheehan K, Delbaere K. Consumer Perspectives on the Adoption of a Prehabilitation Multimodal Online Program for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5039. [PMID: 37894406 PMCID: PMC10605909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the adoption of a prehabilitation multimodal online program. Patients recovering from gastrointestinal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital between October 2021 and November 2022 were invited to participate. An e-Health program including intensity exercises, nutrition and psychological counselling was used. Patients were instructed to navigate the e-Health program over 24 h using an iPad and then complete the study survey. Patients' characteristics, use of technology, views and minimal expected outcomes from a preoperative online program were collected. Of the 30 patients included, most were female, most reported confidence in the use of technology, most considered the online program safe and most agreed it would be beneficial for their health. "Poor preoperative health" and "lack of motivation and encouragement" were identified as the main barriers to the uptake of a preoperative online program, while program 'simplicity' and perceived 'benefits' were the main facilitators. Significant improvement in postoperative outcomes is perceived to influence patients' willingness to participate in a preoperative multimodal e-Health program. Gastrointestinal cancer patients perceived the adoption of a preoperative multimodal e-Health application as safe to be performed at home and of potential benefit to their health. A range of patient's characteristics, barriers and facilitators to the uptake of an online program were identified. These should be considered in future preoperative multimodal online programs to enhance patient experience, adherence and efficacy. The safety and efficacy of the online prehabilitation program will need to be determined in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Linda Denehy
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia;
- Department of Health Services Research: Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Kate McBride
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Jenna Bartyn
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Aaron Sean Lawrence
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Kym Sheehan
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Kim Delbaere
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Banasiewicz T, Kobiela J, Cwaliński J, Spychalski P, Przybylska P, Kornacka K, Bogdanowska-Charkiewicz D, Leyk-Kolańczak M, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Batycka-Stachnik D, Drwiła R. Recommendations on the use of prehabilitation, i.e. comprehensive preparation of the patient for surgery. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2023; 95:62-91. [PMID: 38348849 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.8854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Prehabilitation is a comprehensive preparation of a patient for primarily surgical treatments. Its aim is to improve the patient'sgeneral condition so as to reduce the risk of complications and ensure the fastest possible recovery to full health. Thebasic components of prehabilitation include: improvement of nutritional status, appropriate exercises to improve functioning,psychological support, and help in eliminating addictions. Other important aspects of prehabilitation are: increasinghemoglobin levels in patients with anemia, achieving good glycemic control in patients with diabetes, treatment or stabilizationof any concurrent disorders, or specialist treatment associated with a specific procedure (endoprostheses, ostomyprocedure). This article organizes and outlines the indications for prehabilitation, its scope, duration, and the method to conductit. Experts of various specialties related to prehabilitation agree that it should be an element of surgery preparationwhenever possible, especially in patients with co-existing medical conditions who have been qualified for major procedures.Prehabilitation should be carried out by interdisciplinary teams, including family physicians and various specialists in thetreatment of comorbidities. Prehabilitation requires urgent systemic and reimbursement solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Banasiewicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Jarosław Kobiela
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Jarosław Cwaliński
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Patrycja Przybylska
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Karolina Kornacka
- Oddział Chirurgii Ogólnej, Onkologicznej i Kolorektalnej, Wielospecjalistyczny Szpital Miejski im. J. Strusia, Poznań
| | | | - Magdalena Leyk-Kolańczak
- Zakład Pielęgniarstwa Chirurgicznego, Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Dominika Batycka-Stachnik
- Oddział Kliniczny Chirurgii Serca, Naczyń i Transplantologii, Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Św. Jana Pawła II, Kraków
| | - Rafał Drwiła
- Katedra i Zakład Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
| |
Collapse
|