1
|
de Vargas D, Volpato RJ, Dos Santos LC, Pereira CF, de Oliveira SR, da Silva RR, Maciel MED, Fernandes IL, de Oliveira Santana K, Aguilar TF. Prevalence of psychological and mental health symptoms among nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Americas: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:582-599. [PMID: 38151828 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
To assess the prevalence of mental health symptoms in nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic on the American continent. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that estimated the prevalence of mental health symptoms in nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic was performed through bibliographic database searches. A three-level meta-analysis model was used with the inverse variance method, tau was estimated via restricted maximum likelihood and logistic transformation, and heterogeneity was presented as tau2 and I2. Of the 7467 studies obtained, 62 were included in the meta-analysis, which involved 52 270 nursing professionals. The overall prevalence for at least one mental health symptom was 56.3% (50.4%, 62.1%; I2 = 98.6%, p < 0.001). Eight mental health symptoms were found; among them, the most prevalent were burnout (52.1%, 37.1%, 88.8%; I2 = 98.5%, p < 0.001) and fear (52.1%, 30.1%, 73.3%; I2 = 98.1%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of mental health symptoms in nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic on the American continent was high, and strategies should be developed and implemented by managers and government agencies to promote the well-being, physical and mental health of nursing professionals. Studies like this one are necessary to highlight the need for efforts in the implementation of promotion and prevention actions to be developed by health organisations, managers and leaders with a view to improving the quality of life of nursing workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marjorie Ester Dias Maciel
- Nucleon of Addiction Nursing Research, School of Nursing (NEPEEA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Thiago Faustino Aguilar
- Nucleon of Addiction Nursing Research, School of Nursing (NEPEEA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hernández-Bojorge S, Campos A, Parikh J, Beckstead J, Lajeunesse M, Wildman D. The prevalence and risk factors of PTSD symptoms among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:523-545. [PMID: 38059541 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Since the first reported outbreak in China, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has raised serious concerns globally. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a severe psychological impact on healthcare workers (HCWs), and especially nurses, who are the most numerous and exposed frontline group. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarise extant literature on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health of nurses, particularly concerning the prevalence and risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo from March 2020 to July 2023. Articles were included/excluded on predetermined eligibility criteria. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed using proportions to determine the pooled prevalence for PTSD among nurses. Subgroup analyses were also performed, and heterogeneity across studies was analysed using meta-regression. Relatively high prevalence rates of PTSD were reported among nurse populations during the COVID-19 pandemic in twenty-six different countries, globally. Risk factors associated with PTSD include having prior mental health co-morbidities, being a female, having high exposure/contact with COVID-19 patients, having insufficient protective conditions and having intensive workloads. The overall pooled prevalence was 29.1% (95% C.I. = 23.5%, 35.5%) using a random-effects model in 55 studies. The regression test of funnel plot asymmetry indicated a significant level of publication bias among studies. The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with significant levels of PTSD among frontline nurses globally. A high level of heterogeneity was observed across studies. Psychological, social and administrative interventions should be implemented to mitigate heavy psychological distress in nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Hernández-Bojorge
- Department of Global and Planetary Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Adriana Campos
- Department of Global and Planetary Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jeegan Parikh
- Department of Global and Planetary Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jason Beckstead
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Marc Lajeunesse
- Department of Integrative Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Derek Wildman
- Department of Genomics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu D, Zhou Y, Tao X, Cheng Y, Tao R. Mental health symptoms and associated factors among primary healthcare workers in China during the post-pandemic era. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1374667. [PMID: 38807997 PMCID: PMC11130373 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1374667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among healthcare workers has been widely reported during the initial and ongoing phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, little remains known about the mental health status of primary healthcare workers in China during the post-pandemic era. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 1, 2023, and May 31, 2023 in Anhui China. A total of 13,530 primary healthcare workers were recruited. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify potential factors associated with the incidence of depression and anxiety among primary healthcare workers. Results The prevalence of depression and anxiety among primary healthcare workers was 50.7 and 26.4%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression revealed that female gender (OR = 1.345, 95%CI = 1.222-1.479), being divorced or widowed (OR = 1.432, 95%CI = 1.128-1.817), being a nurse (OR = 1.250, 95%CI = 1.126-1.388), and working more than 8 h per day (OR = 1.710, 95%CI = 1.583-1.846) were significantly associated with depression. A higher risk of anxiety among primary healthcare workers was associated with female gender (OR = 1.338, 95%CI = 1.198-1.494), being divorced or widowed (OR = 1.373, 95%CI = 1.056-1.770), being a nurse (OR = 1.139, 95%CI = 1.013-1.282), and working more than 8 h per day (OR = 1.638, 95%CI = 1.497-1.794). Better monthly income, more than 21 years of working experience and without experience of workplace violence were protective factors against depression and anxiety during the post-pandemic era. Conclusion Depressive symptoms are more common among primary healthcare workers in China during the post-pandemic era. Female gender, being divorced or widowed, being a nurse, working years, working seniority, monthly income, and experience of workplace violence were identified as associated factors. Targeted intervention is needed when developing strategies to reduce depression and improve primary healthcare workers' wellness and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Difei Liu
- School of Education, Hefei University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuhe Zhou
- School of Education, Hefei University, Hefei, China
| | - Xubowen Tao
- School of Physical Education, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China
| | - Yutong Cheng
- School of Education, Hefei University, Hefei, China
| | - Rui Tao
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu J, Dou X, Yi Y, Yu Y, Zhou L. Prevalence and Determinants of Anxiety and Depression Among Healthcare Workers in Liaoning Province, China. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2024; 17:983-993. [PMID: 38680481 PMCID: PMC11055524 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s460118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the anxiety and depression and their predictors among healthcare workers in Liaoning Province, China. Methods In order to explore the influencing factors and prevalence of anxiety and depression among healthcare workers, a cross-sectional research design was used to survey 500 healthcare workers using the 14-item Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS). Results About 47.12% of the healthcare workers suffered from anxiety and 71.63% suffered from depression. In our study, we found that the health status (OR: 0.540, 95% CI: 0.298-0.976), self-esteem (OR: 0.395, 95% CI: 0.251-0.619), PSS (OR: 0.621, 95% CI: 0.388-0.994), organizational support (OR: 0.533, 95% CI. 0.333-0.854) were protective factors for healthcare workers suffering from anxiety, and resistance to COVID-19 (OR: 1.703, 95% CI: 1.082-2.681) was a risk factor for healthcare workers suffering from anxiety, while good quality of life (OR: 0.385, 95% CI: 0.206-0.719) self-esteem (OR: 0.187, 95% CI: 0.110-0.317), and PSS (OR: 0.475, 95% CI: 0.267-0.847) were protective factors for healthcare workers suffering from depression, and at the age of 35-40 years (OR: 2.475, 95% CI: 1.140-5.369) and resistance to COVID-19 (OR: 2.219, 95% CI: 1.313-3.751) were risk factors for healthcare workers suffering from depression. Conclusion The anxiety and depression status of healthcare workers in China is poor, and hospital administrators should take positive measures to support healthcare workers and give positive expectations to alleviate negative emotions such as anxiety and depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiachen Lu
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaofeng Dou
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yaohui Yi
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingying Yu
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ling Zhou
- School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Du J, Wu C, Zheng WK, Cui SN, Li L, Liu Z, Gao L, Heng CN, Lang HJ. Insomnia and anxiety among COVID-19 patients in China: the chain mediating effect of psychological capital and self-esteem. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:221. [PMID: 38561710 PMCID: PMC10983642 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01563-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outbreak of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) in 2019 has continued until now, posing a huge threat to the public's physical and mental health, resulting in different degrees of mental health problems. As a vulnerable segment of the public, anxiety is one of the most common mental health problems among COVID-19 patients. Excessive anxiety aggravates the physical and psychological symptoms of COVID-19 patients, which is detrimental to their treatment and recovery, increases financial expenditure, affects family relations, and adds to the medical burden. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the role of psychological capital and self-esteem in the relationship between insomnia and anxiety, thereby shedding light on the mechanism of the effect of insomnia on anxiety in COVID-19 patients. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2022 in Fangcang hospital in Shanghai, China. The self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 718 COVID-19 patients via cell phone using the Internet platform "Questionnaire Star", which included Athens Insomnia Scale, Psychological Capital Questionnaire, Self-esteem Scale, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, gender, age, marital status, education. Data analysis was performed using descriptive analysis, independent-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, ordinary least-squares regression, and bootstrap method. RESULTS Education background had significant impact on anxiety in COVID-19 patients (F = 7.70, P < 0.001). Insomnia, psychological capital, self-esteem and anxiety were significantly correlated, respectively (P < 0.001). And Regression analysis showed that insomnia had a direct negative predictive effect on psychological capital (β = -0.70, P < 0.001) and self-esteem (β = -0.13, P < 0.001). Psychological capital had a direct positive predictive effect on self-esteem (β = 0.12, P < 0.001). Insomnia had a direct positive predictive effect on anxiety (β = 0.61, P < 0.001). Both psychological capital and self-esteem had significant negative predictive effects on anxiety (β = -0.06, P < 0.05; β = -0.72, P < 0.001). The results showed that the mediating effect of psychological capital and self-esteem was significant, and the mediating effect value was 0.21. First, the indirect effect consisting of insomnia - psychological capital - anxiety was 0.04, showing that psychological capital had a significant mediating effect. Second, the indirect effect consisting of insomnia-self-esteem-anxiety had a value of 0.10, indicating that self-esteem had a significant mediating effect. Third, the indirect effect consisting of insomnia-psychological capital-self-esteem-anxiety had a value of 0.06, suggesting that psychological capital and self-esteem had a significant chain mediating effect between insomnia and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Insomnia had a significant positive predictive effect on anxiety. Insomnia was first associated with a decrease in psychological capital, followed by a sequential decrease in self-esteem, which in turn was associated with increased anxiety symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, focusing on improving the psychological capital and self-esteem of patients can help alleviate the anxiety caused by insomnia in COVID-19 patients. It is recommended that patients and health care professionals increase the psychological capital and Self-esteem of COVID-19 patients through various methods to counter the effects of insomnia on anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Du
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Chao Wu
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Wen-Kai Zheng
- School of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010110, China
| | - Sheng-Nan Cui
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of endocrinology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, Shaanxi, 710038, China
| | - Zhuo Liu
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Li Gao
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| | - Chun-Ni Heng
- Department of endocrinology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, Shaanxi, 710038, China.
| | - Hong-Juan Lang
- School of Nursing, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tao R, Li W, Min K, Mo D, Geng F, Xia L, Liu T, Liu Y, Jiang F, Liu H, Tang YL. Prevalence and associated factors of depression, anxiety and stress among clinical therapists in China in the context of early COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1342528. [PMID: 38463429 PMCID: PMC10920219 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1342528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To study the socio-demographic characteristics and the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among clinical therapists in China during the early Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to identify associated factors. Method This cross-sectional study was part of a multicenter, nationally representative survey conducted through WeChat from January 2021 to March 2021. Data, including socio-demographics, health-related behaviors, and information on whether they participated in the frontline work of treating COVID-19, were collected anonymously. Respondents also completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21). Results In total, 396 clinical therapists in the selected hospitals completed the questionnaires, with a response rate of 89.0%. Respondents were predominantly female (77.3%). About 6.6% of the participants were current tobacco users, and 20.7% had participated in the frontline work of treating COVID-19. Overall, 22.0%, 17.9%, and 8.8% of participants were classified as having clinically meaningful depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively, based on DASS-21 scores. Multiple logistic regression in Model 1 and Model 2 showed that depression, anxiety, and stress were associated with regular physical activity and frequent insomnia (all, p < 0.05). In anxiety model 2, the associated factors for anxiety during the pandemic were identified as education (master's degree or more, OR=0.520; 95% CI=0.283-0.955), marital status (single, OR=2.064; 95% CI=1.022-4.168), tobacco use (OR=4.265; 95% CI=1.352-13.454), regular physical activity (OR=0.357; 95% CI=0.192-0.663), frequent insomnia (OR=6.298; 95% CI =2.522-15.729), and participation in the frontline work of treating COVID-19 (OR=3.179; 95% CI=1.697-5.954). The COVID-19 epidemic did not significantly increase the depression and stress levels among clinical therapists, but it did significantly increase anxiety levels. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, depression, anxiety and stress were relatively common among clinical therapists in China. Regular physical activity and good sleep were important protective factors against emotional problems. Therefore, encouraging regular physical activity and actively addressing clinical therapists' sleep problems is beneficial to improving the ability to cope with negative emotions. The COVID-19 epidemic significantly increased anxiety, and awareness and interventions should be recommended to reduce anxiety among clinical therapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Tao
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
| | - Wenzheng Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
- Department of Substance-Related Disorders, Hefei Fourth People’s Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Kaiyuan Min
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Daming Mo
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
- Department of Substance-Related Disorders, Hefei Fourth People’s Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Feng Geng
- Department of Psychiatry, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Lei Xia
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
| | - Tingfang Liu
- Research Department, School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanli Liu
- Research Department, School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Research Department, School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Research Department, Institute of Healthy Yangtze River Delta, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huanzhong Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Psychiatry, Anhui Psychiatric Center, Hefei, China
| | - Yi-lang Tang
- Addiction Psychiatry Fellowship Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Mental Health Service Line, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guillen-Burgos HF, Galvez-Florez JF, Moreno-Lopez S, Gonzalez I, Guillen M, Anaya JM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes after COVID-19: A 24-month follow-up longitudinal study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2023; 84:241-249. [PMID: 37690207 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate the proportion of mental health outcomes (MHOs) and associated factors in COVID-19 survivors during a 24-month follow-up period. METHOD An observational, prospective study was performed in a teaching hospital in Barranquilla, Colombia, from April 1, 2020, to August 30, 2022. A cohort of 1565 COVID-19 survivors was recruited after discharge from the emergency room (ER), inpatient floor (IF), and intensive care unit (ICU) services and followed for 24 -months. The clinical assessment included screening scales for symptoms of anxiety, depressive, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and insomnia. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were also collected to identify possible associated factors. Descriptive, bivariate and mixed random-effect linear models were performed. RESULTS A total of 1565 patients were included, of whom 785 (50.35%) were men. A large proportion of patients with mental symptoms were identified. After 24-months, the proportions of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and insomnia symptoms remained high at 16.55%, 21.79%, 35.27%, and 23.86%, respectively. Social factors, location of hospital stays, physical comorbidities, and the severity of COVID-19 were significantly associated with anxiety, depression, PTSD, and insomnia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19's 2-year deleterious impacts on mental health, as well as the variables influencing these findings, have been documented. These results should aid in the development of public health initiatives to reduce morbidity rates in post-COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan F Guillen-Burgos
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; Center for Clinical and Translational Research, School of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Juan Francisco Galvez-Florez
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; Latin-American Society of Consultation - Liaison Psychiatry, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Isabella Gonzalez
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; School of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Manuela Guillen
- Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia; School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Juan-Manuel Anaya
- Health Research and Innovation Center - Coosalud EPS, Cartagena, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olivencia-Carrión MA, Olivencia-Carrión MD, Fernández-Daza M, Zabarain-Cogollo S, Castro GP, Jiménez-Torres MG. Anxiety Levels and Coping Strategies to Deal with COVID-19: A Cross-Cultural Study among the Spanish and Latin American Healthcare Populations. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:844. [PMID: 36981500 PMCID: PMC10048083 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Given its impact, COVID-19 has engendered great challenges in terms of health, highlighting the key role of health personnel. This study aims to analyze the level of anxiety, as well as coping strategies, among the health personnel in Latin American countries and Spain. An exploratory, descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted with 584 participants from the healthcare population. No significant differences were observed in anxiety levels due to COVID-19 between Latin American countries and Spain. In Spain, an active and passive coping style is used, while in Latin American countries, an avoidance coping style is employed; there is a direct correlation between anxiety levels and the avoidance coping style. There exists an inverse correlation between anxiety levels and the use of an active coping style; moreover, there are no significant differences in the anxiety level of health personnel depending on whether they have cared for patients with COVID-19. Low cognitive activity, use of the avoidance method and Spanish geography were the main predictive coping styles of anxiety. Effective measures are required for preserving the mental health of health professionals during pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martha Fernández-Daza
- Psychology Program, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
- Interdisciplinary Social Studies Research Group-ESI, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
| | - Sara Zabarain-Cogollo
- Psychology Program, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
- Interdisciplinary Social Studies Research Group-ESI, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
| | - Greys Patricia Castro
- Psychology Program, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
- Interdisciplinary Social Studies Research Group-ESI, Santa Marta 110000, Colombia
| | - Manuel Gabriel Jiménez-Torres
- Health Psychology/Behavioural Medicine Research Group (CTS-267), Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|