Identifying the High-risk Patient with Clinically Relevant Embolisation After Carotid Endarterectomy

ASNM and ASN joint guidelines for transcranial Doppler ultrasonic monitoring: An update

Today, it seems prudent to reconsider how ultrasound technology can be used for providing intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring that will result in better patient outcomes and decreased length and cost of hospitalization. An extensive and rapidly growing literature suggests that the essential hemodynamic information provided by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography neuromonitoring (TCDNM) would provide effective monitoring modality for improving outcomes after different types of vascular, neurosurgical, orthopedic, cardiovascular, and cardiothoracic surgeries and some endovascular interventional or diagnostic procedures, like cardiac catheterization or cerebral angiography. Understanding, avoiding, and preventing peri- or postoperative complications, including neurological deficits following abovementioned surgeries, endovascular intervention, or diagnostic procedures, represents an area of great public and economic benefit for society, especially considering the aging population. The American Society of Neurophysiologic Monitoring and American Society of Neuroimaging Guidelines Committees formed a joint task force and developed updated guidelines to assist in the use of TCDNM in the surgical and intensive care settings. Specifically, these guidelines define (1) the objectives of TCD monitoring; (2) the responsibilities and behaviors of the neurosonographer during monitoring; (3) instrumentation and acquisition parameters; (4) safety considerations; (5) contemporary rationale for TCDNM; (6) TCDNM perspectives; and (7) major recommendations.

Changes in middle cerebral artery velocity after carotid endarterectomy do not identify patients at high-risk of suffering intracranial haemorrhage or stroke due to hyperperfusion syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To determine if significant increases in middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV) or pulsatility index (PI) during and immediately after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were predictive of patients suffering a stroke due to the hyperperfusion syndrome (HS) or intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) mean/peak MCAV and PI were recorded pre-operatively; pre-clamp; 1-min post-declamping; 10-min post-declamping and 30-min post-operatively. The study was divided into two time periods; Group 1 (1995-2007); where there was no formal guidance for managing post-CEA hypertension (PEH) and Group 2 (2008-2012); where written guidelines for treating PEH were available.

RESULTS

11/1024 patients in Group 1 (1.1%) suffered a stroke due to HS/ICH, compared to 0/426 patients (0.0%) in Group 2 (p = 0.02). In Group 1; intra-operative increases >100% in mean/peak MCAV and PI at 1 and 10-min post-clamp release had positive predictive values (PPV) of 1.2%, 6.3% and 20.0% and 2.9%, 8.0% and 16.6% respectively. Post-operatively; a >100% increase in mean and peak MCAV had a PPV of 6.3% and 2.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to demonstrate that significant increases in MCAV and PI were able to predict patients at increased risk of suffering a post-operative stroke due to HS or ICH. The provision of written guidance for managing PEH in Group 2 patients was associated with virtual abolition of ICH/HS.

The current management of carotid atherosclerotic disease: who, when and how?

Ischaemic stroke represents a major health hazard in the western world, which has a severe impact on society and the health-care system. Roughly, 10% of all first ischaemic strokes can be attributed to significant atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries. Correct management of these lesions is essential in the prevention and treatment of carotid disease-related ischaemic events. The close relationship between diagnosis and medical and surgical management makes it necessary that all involved physicians and surgeons have profound knowledge of management strategies beyond their specific speciality. Continuous improvement in pharmacological therapy and operative techniques as well as frequently changing guidelines represent a constant challenge for the individual health-care professional. This review gives a thorough outline of the up-to-date evidence-based management of carotid artery disease and discusses its current controversies.