Predictors of outcome after endovascular repair for chronic type B dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43:386-391. [PMID: 22326695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.01.016]

Emerging Trends in the Care of Type B Aortic Dissections

Aortic dissection is the most common of the acute aortic syndromes. Acute aortic dissection remains a highly morbid and potentially lethal condition despite contemporary advances in medical and surgical care. Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is classified as uncomplicated, uncomplicated with high-risk features, and complicated. The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in uncomplicated TBAD remains uncertain and is the topic of ongoing clinical trials. In most complicated cases, TEVAR is effective at restoring visceral and extremity blood flow. TEVAR has also been shown to arrest hemorrhage in the setting of thoracic aortic rupture. TEVAR has been demonstrated to induce satisfactory remodeling in the covered segment of the thoracic aorta, but progressive enlargement of the visceral aorta has led to a variety of techniques designed to promote remodeling in the uncovered aortic segment. There is a need to better define high-risk features so that treatment can be tailored to specific clinical conditions.

Predicting Aneurysmal Degeneration in Uncomplicated Residual Type B Aortic Dissection

The formation of an aneurysm in the false lumen (FL) is a long-term complication in a significant percentage of type B aortic dissection (AD) patients. The ability to predict which patients are likely to progress to aneurysm formation is key to justifying the risks of interventional therapy. The investigation of patient-specific hemodynamics has the potential to enable a patient-tailored approach to improve prognosis by guiding disease management for type B dissection. CFD-derived hemodynamic descriptors and geometric features were used to retrospectively assess individual aortas for a population of residual type B AD patients and analyze correlations with known outcomes (i.e., rapid aortic growth, death). The results highlight great variability in flow patterns and hemodynamic descriptors. A rapid aortic expansion was found to be associated with a larger FL. Time-averaged wall shear stress at the tear region emerged as a possible indicator of the dynamics of flow exchange between lumens and its effect on the evolution of individual aortas. High FL flow rate and tortuosity were associated with adverse outcomes suggesting a role as indicators of risk. AD induces complex changes in vessel geometry and hemodynamics. The reported findings emphasize the need for a patient-tailored approach when evaluating uncomplicated type B AD patients and show the potential of CFD-derived hemodynamics to complement anatomical assessment and help disease management.

Six Years' Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic dissection is associated with a risk for distal stent-graft-induced new entry (dSINE) in up to a quarter of cases. We assess the mid-term outcome of a novel dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), which is a custom-made device based on the Cook Alpha platform, with a modified graft design and a distal endovascular elephant trunk without any supporting stent to reduce the radial force on the dissection membrane at the distal landing zone.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of chronic dissection patients at high risk of dSINE who received an elective endovascular repair with DSSG from January 2017 to June 2023. The primary outcome is Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated freedom from dSINE during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included technical success, aortic remodeling, and anatomical evaluation of the distal landing zone in cases with dSINE during follow-up versus those without.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (24 males) with a median age of 66 years [range=31-78] underwent elective TEVAR with the DSSG. The majority, n=27 (90%), had previous aortic repair; 7 (23%) had established connective tissue disease, and 6 (20%) had established dSINE after previous stent-graft implantation as an indication for TEVAR. Technical success was achieved in n=29 (97%). Median follow-up was 38.5 months (4.3-76.4), and KM estimated freedom from dSINE at 1 and 3 years was 95.6% (SE 0.043) and 89% (SE 0.081), respectively Four cases developed dSINE during follow-up. The median distance from the distal stent-graft to the coeliac trunk was 74mm (range=18-123) in the dSINE group versus 26mm (range=0-74) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.049). Median proximal tangential aortic angulation in the distal landing zone was 38.5° (range=26°-50°) in the dSINE group compared to 21° (range=3-61°) in the non-dSINE group (p=0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

The Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of chronic dissection is safe and feasible, with remodeling outcomes comparable with standard TEVAR. The reduced distal radial force in the DSSG does not eliminate the risk for dSINE over time, with new entries occurring, particularly in cases where the distal landing zone is in a tortuous aortic segment and not close to the coeliac trunk.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Using the novel dissection-specific stent-graft with reduced radial force is safe and feasible but does not completely eliminate the risk of dSINE occurring over time. The exact positioning of the distal stent-graft in a straight aortic segment, close to the coeliac trunk, may be of importance to further mitigate the risk.

Novel insights into thoracic endografts technology for prevention of distal stent-graft induced new entry (dSINE) following endovascular repair of type B aortic dissections: from bench to bedside

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissections (TBAD) has currently acquired a primary therapeutic role when anatomically feasible. The main issue with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic dissection is the actual nature of the aortic wall, which is structurally compromised and more fragile. Indeed, a wealth of data have shown that TEVAR for TBAD will lead, in a substantial proportion of cases, to a device-related adverse event named distal stent-graft induced new entry (dSINE).

AREAS COVERED

Currently available aortic stent-grafts have not been specifically devised for the treatment of aortic dissection. A novel dissection specific stent-graft (DSSG) was developed, which is a custom-made device based on the Zenith Alpha Thoracic platform (Cook Medical). The DSSG has several unique properties that, in principle, make its use optimal in TBAD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

TEVAR in the setting of aortic dissections remains technically challenging. The occurrence of dSINE represents a unique complication in this scenario and may lead to high rates of aortic-related adverse events and need for secondary interventions. The use of a novel custom-made DSSG in the setting of chronic TBAD has been proven to be safe, feasible and effective. However, even this approach may fail to completely prevent dSINE formation.

STABILISE (Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair) Is Associated With Good Anatomical Results on the Distal Thoracoabdominal Aorta at 2 Years

PURPOSE

The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the increased aortic diameter of the distal aorta after implementing the STABILISE technique in complicated type B aortic dissection (AD).

DESIGN

This is a comparative monocentric retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent an STABILISE procedure for complicated AD between 2018 and 2020 were included and compared with a historic cohort treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) alone. Aortic diameters were measured at 6 different levels on the thoracic and abdominal aorta. The primary end point was an increased aortic diameter at 1 and 2 years. The exclusion criterion was the absence of a computed tomography (CT) scan at 1 or 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were included: 24 in the TEVAR group and 31 in the STABILISE group. At the level of the stent graft, there was a decrease in aortic diameters in both groups without significant differences. At the level of the distal aorta, there was an increase in aortic diameters in both groups without significant differences. There were significantly more patients in the TEVAR group with an unfavorable increase in aortic diameter >5 mm of the distal aorta at 2 years than in the STABILISE group: 8 (33%) vs 1 (3%) (p=0.01). For chronic ADs, a significantly greater increase in aortic diameters of the distal aorta was observed in the STABILISE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The STABILISE technique is technically feasible and potentially leads to decreased longer re-intervention rates; indeed, more patients had an unfavorable increase in aortic diameter in the TEVAR group than in the STABILISE group at 2 years. The high rate of long-term distal aortic aneurysm progression and reintervention after TEVAR alone suggests that this option is not sufficient to definitively treat these complex patients.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This article reported the results of stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination (STABILISE) with a follow-up at 2 years. This is the first comparative study between STABILISE, which has emerged as a new technique inducing aortic remodeling and therefore better long-term outcome, and the standard technique TEVAR alone. STABILISE technique is associated with good results on the distal aorta at 2 years with a rate of patient with unfavorable aortic diameter evolution greater in TEVAR group compared to STABILISE group and could improve the long-term results on the distal aorta by inducing extensive aortic remodeling.

Aortic remodeling following hybrid arch repair with zone 0 to 5 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs for complex arch and descending thoracic aortic pathologies

Objective

For high-risk patients with aortic arch pathology, hybrid aortic arch repair with simultaneous or staged thoracic endovascular repair of the descending aorta may be a viable alternative to open repair. However, data on postintervention aortic remodeling remain limited. We report the short-term outcomes of remodeling of the thoracoabdominal aorta after hybrid arch repair + thoracic endovascular repair.

Methods

All patients undergoing hybrid arch repair with planned zones 0 to 5 thoracic endovascular repair from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography angiography scans preoperatively, after hybrid aortic arch repair, and on long-term follow-up were analyzed for thoracoabdominal aorta remodeling. Mean change in aortic true luminal diameter and full luminal diameter was calculated at every level, and paired-samples t test was used to compare means.

Results

Of 39 patients, 38 had follow-up data at a mean duration of 14.9 months. There were a total of 3 (7.7%) deaths, 0 (0.0%) strokes, and 0 (0.0%) paralysis. For the 35 patients undergoing thoracic endovascular repair for aortic dissection, at follow-up, there was a significant increase in the mean true luminal diameter at each level (P < .05), except at the aortic bifurcation and common iliac arteries. The largest increase in mean true luminal diameter (P < .01) was observed at the level of the left inferior pulmonary vein (mean difference +13.22 mm, 95% CI, 10.38-16.07), tracheal carina (mean difference +13.06 mm, 95% CI, 10.05-16.07), and inferior left atrium (mean difference +11.19 mm, 95% CI, 7.84-14.53).

Conclusions

Hybrid arch repair with zones 0 to 5 leads to improved true lumen augmentation in zones 0 to 8 with complete false lumen thrombosis down to zone 5 at short-term follow-up. Zones 9 to 11, if involved, may require adjunctive treatment strategies for total aortic remodeling and complete false lumen obliteration.

Risk Factors for Incomplete Aortic Remodeling With Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination in Aortic Dissection Repair for Complicated Aortic Dissection: Results of a Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

The STABILISE technique has extended the treatment of aortic dissection to the thoracoabdominal aorta to achieve complete aortic remodeling. The aim of this multicenter study was to analyze the short- and midterm anatomical results of the STABILISE technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with the STABILISE technique for complicated aortic dissection at 3 French academic centers. The aortic diameter at different levels was measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 1 year.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, 58 patients, including 47 men (average patient age: 60±11 years), were treated for type B aortic dissection in 34 cases and residual aortic dissection after type A repair in 24 cases. Three (5.2%) patients died postoperatively. Complete aortic remodeling (false lumen thrombosis and complete reapposition of the intimal flap) was achieved in 45/55 patients (81.8%), and false lumen thrombosis in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 52/55 patients (94.5%). At 1 year, with a computed tomographic (CT) scan available for 98.2% (54/55) of patients, we observed a significant decrease in the maximal thoracic aortic diameter and a significant increase in the aortic diameter at the bare-stent level compared with the preoperative CT scan. Severe aortic angulation (p=0.024) was a risk factor for incomplete aortic remodeling and significantly increased the aortic diameter (p=0.032). Chronic aortic dissection was associated with an increased risk of incomplete aortic remodeling (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

STABILISE for complicated aortic dissection results in false lumen thrombosis, complete reapposition of the intimal flap, and a decrease in the maximum aortic diameter in most cases. Incomplete reapposition of the intimal flap, which is more frequent in cases of chronic aortic dissection and severe aortic angulation, is a risk factor for a significant increase in the aortic diameter at the bare-stent level, and this risk justifies close follow-up and better patient selection.

CLINICAL IMPACT

STABILISE technique for complicated aortic dissection results in false lumen thrombosis, complete aortic remodeling and a decrease in the maximum aortic diameter in most cases. At the bare-stent level, incomplete reapposition of the intimal flap, more frequent in chronic aortic dissection and severe aortic angulation, is a risk factor for an increased aortic diameter. This finding justifies close follow-up and better patient selection; thus, the STABILISE technique should be used with care in chronic aortic dissection and severe aortic angulation.

Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Nonacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Entry closure with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) results in aortic remodeling recently. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between aortic diameter or timing of surgical intervention from onset and remodeling after TEVAR for uncomplicated nonacute TBAD.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and December 2021, 83 consecutive patients underwent TEVAR for TBAD at our center. Forty patients with subacute and chronic uncomplicated TBADs with a patent false lumen, who could be followed up for at least 6 months, were included in this study. Indications for TEVAR included aortic diameter enlargement and preemptive treatment to prevent future aneurysmal changes in patients at risk of aortic diameter enlargement. Aortic remodeling was accessed, and data between the remodeling and nonremodeling groups were compared.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 97.5%, with a type Ia endoleak remaining in 1 patient. No operative or in-hospital mortality occurred. Paraparesis occurred in only 1 patient (2.5%). Follow-up was completed at a median of 53.5 months. Late death occurred in 3 cases, but there were no aortic-related deaths. Late aortic remodeling was achieved in 22 patients (55%). The preoperative maximum aortic diameter (PMAD) in the thoracic aortic region was 51.5 mm in the nonremodeling group, significantly larger than 42.5 mm in the remodeling group (P < 0.0001). The cutoff value of the PMAD for predicting aortic remodeling was 45 mm (area under the curve, 0.917; P = 0.028). The remodeling group had an earlier time from onset to intervention than the nonremodeling group, with a cutoff value of 6.3 months (area under the curve, 0.743; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for nonacute uncomplicated TBAD resulted in a late aortic remodeling rate of 55%. This study suggested that a PMAD of >45 mm or a period >6.3 months between dissection onset and surgery hinders aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Prevention of distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) can occur after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness of restrictive bare stent (RBS), tapered stent graft (TSG), and non-TSG in TEVAR in preventing dSINE after a midterm follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR (June 2010 to December 2018). The occurrence of dSINE during follow-up was examined. Predictors of dSINE were determined using Fine-Gray regression with death as the competing event. Survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Finally, 364 patients were included: 111 with non-TSG TEVAR, 125 with TSG TEVAR, and 128 with TEVAR with RBS. After 54.5 months, incidences of dSINE in the 3 groups were 12.61%, 4.80%, and 1.56%, respectively (P = .002). On Fine-Gray regression adjusted for clinically relevant covariates, the expansion mismatch ratio (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.12; P < .001) and complete false lumen thrombosis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.94; P = .037) were identified as predictors of dSINE. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that dSINE was not only a risk factor for aortic-related mortality (hazard ratio, 17.90; 95% CI, 3.27-98.12; P = .001), but also a predominant risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 4.91; 95% CI, 1.66-14.52; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

dSINE can happen in TBAD patients who undergo TEVAR. Thus, long-term surveillance is crucial. TSG and RBS had lower expansion mismatch ratios, which might help prevent dSINE.

Evaluation of false lumen occluders implanted in the abdominal aorta false lumen

OBJECTIVE

Management of postdissection thoracoabdominal aneurysms with a fenestrated and/or branched endograft (F/BEVAR) is associated with favorable outcomes. Treatment should include both true lumen endografting and false lumen occlusion (FLO). Favorable results have recently been reported for FLO in the false lumen of the thoracic aorta. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of FLO of the abdominal aorta in patients treated for post dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysm.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of prospective data of consecutive patients managed for post dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm from April 2019 to December 2022 with F/BEVAR associated with FLO in the abdominal false lumen was conducted. The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was followed. Baseline demographics, operative details, and early outcomes (mortality, length of stay) were recorded. Primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. FLO technical success was defined as complete occlusion of false lumen backflow above the FLO on completion angiogram.

RESULTS

During the 3-year study, 23 patients were treated for post dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysm with F/BEVAR and the use of abdominal FLO. Twenty-one patients (91.3%) had received prior endovascular treatment. The technical and clinical success was 95.7%. The abdominal FLO had a technical success rate of 78.3%. The median diameter of the FLO was 34 mm. No patient died during the perioperative period, and one patient had spinal cord ischemia (4.3%) with partial recovery. Six patients (26.1%) required early reintervention. The median duration of hospitalization in the intensive care unit and overall was 1 day (interquartile range, 0-3 days) and 7.5 days (interquartile range, 2-22 days), respectively. During the mean follow-up of 9.9 ± 9.0 months, no patient died. False lumen occlusion was complete or partial in nine (39.1%) and nine (39.1%) patients, respectively. No aortic rupture occurred during follow-up. Maximum aortic diameter decreased in 48% and remained stable in 39% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal aorta FLO during endovascular treatment of post dissection thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with favorable outcomes. It offers an additional staging therapeutic option before extensive aorto-bi-iliac coverage, associated with low spinal cord ischemia rates. FLO also provides high rates of false lumen occlusion and false lumen remodeling during follow-up. Longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to confirm these very promising early findings.

Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Aortic Shrinkage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysmal Chronic Aortic Dissection

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic aortic dissection (AD) with aneurysmal degeneration remains controversial. We retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes and assessed predictors of aortic shrinkage after TEVAR for chronic aneurysmal AD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2021, 70 patients with double-barrel-type chronic AD were enrolled. Major intimal tears in thoracic aorta were covered by stent graft. Early and late clinical outcomes, and diameter change of downstream aorta during follow-up period were reviewed. Subsequently, factors associated with aortic shrinkage were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-68) years, 54 (80%) men, median duration from AD onset was 4 (IQR: 1-10) years, and maximum aortic diameter was 53 (IQR: 49-58) mm. Supra-aortic debranching procedure was required in 57 (81%) patients. Early aorta-related death occurred in 2 (3%) patients. Both stroke and spinal cord ischemia occurred in 1 (2%) patient. Five-year freedom rates from aorta-related death and reintervention were 96% and 51%, respectively. Sixty-four patients underwent follow-up computed tomography (84%) 1 year after TEVAR, with 33 (52%) achieving aortic shrinkage. In multivariable analysis, duration from AD onset (per year) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 0.70-0.97; p=0.017) and maximum aortic-diameter ratio between aortic arch and descending aorta (per 0.1) (morphologic index; OR: 1.34, 1.04-1.74; p=0.023) were independent aortic shrinkage predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic AD with aneurysmal degeneration achieved satisfactory survival outcomes, but with a considerable reintervention rate. Duration from AD onset and preoperative aortic morphology could affect post-TEVAR aortic shrinkage. Earlier intervention could lead to better aortic shrinkage.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration showed low incidence of early and late aorta-related death. By contrast, aortic shrinkage rate was low with high incidence of reintervention to the residual downstream aorta. According to the assessment of preoperative variables, chronicity and aortic morphology could predict postoperative aortic shrinkage.

The Caged Knickerbocker: A Novel Modification to Targeted False Lumen Management in Complex Aortic Dissection

INTRODUCTION

Targeted false lumen management has been described for complex presentations of aortic dissection. The "Knickerbocker" technique is often referenced and includes dilating a focal portion of an oversized endograft in the true lumen to purposefully rupture the false lumen septum, but at the expense of increased risk for visceral propagation and malperfusion. This case series describes a novel modification of the Knickerbocker technique by caging the distal end of the endograft prior to focal dilation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic center from 2018-2020. Patients were included if they had a history or current presentation of aortic dissection and underwent a Caged Knickerbocker (CKB) repair. Data were collected to include demographics, indications for repair, technical success, perioperative outcomes, hospital course, mortality, and further aortic interventions.

RESULTS

Five patients were included in our evaluation. Four patients (80%) presented with chronic Type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) and concomitant aneurysmal degeneration of the thoracic aorta; 1 patient (20%) presented with an acute rupture secondary to cTBAD. Three patients (60%) had previous aortic repairs, 2 of which were for Type A Aortic Dissection that additionally required redo sternotomy and total arch replacement prior to CKB. CKB was technically successful in all cases with no peri-operative complications. Two (40%) patients required further aortic intervention due to aneurysmal degeneration.

CONCLUSION

Achieving complete false lumen thrombosis is a considerable challenge when managing complex aortic dissections. Our data demonstrate the technical feasibly and early successful outcomes with the CKB approach. Importantly, CKB facilitates future distal extension into the para-visceral aorta in cases of complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Further research should focus on discerning individual patients who will benefit from targeted false lumen management and compare outcomes between different approaches.

Changing Management of Type B Aortic Dissections

The purpose of this manuscript is to review recent trends in the management of acute type B aortic dissection. Due to its efficacy and low morbidity, thoracic endografting has rapidly been adopted as the treatment of choice for most patients with malperfusion or rupture as a consequence of acute aortic dissection. This technology is increasingly applied to patients without rupture or malperfusion, so-called "uncomplicated" dissections, to reduce the incidence of late aneurysmal degeneration in the ungrafted segments of the thoracoabdominal aorta. A variety of techniques have been proposed, including intentional rupture of the dissection membrane to obliterate the false lumen as well as the candy-plug technique to eliminate retrograde flow in the false lumen.

Aortic arch surgery for type B aortic dissection: How far should we go? The value of a hybrid approach

Traditionally, the management of type B aortic dissection has been the domain of the vascular surgeons. Timing and type of intervention still generate debate. We sought to review our early experience with the treatment of this condition based on a hybrid approach following an aortic multi-disciplinary team meeting involving close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, vascular anesthetists, and cardiac anesthetists. Four patients (age 41-56 years; 3 males; 1 female) with type B aortic dissection underwent aortic arch surgery through a hybrid approach: one elective procedure consisting of ascending aorta and hemi-arch replacement with debranching followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR); one redo procedure requiring aortic arch replacement with hybrid frozen elephant trunk; two acute presentations (aortic arch replacement and debranching followed by TEVAR; AVR with ascending aorta, arch, and proximal descending thoracic aorta replacement with conventional elephant trunk and debranching). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was required in three patients. Despite respiratory complications and slightly prolonged postoperative course, all patients survived without onset of stroke, paraplegia, malperfusion, endoleak, or need for re-exploration. Follow-up remains satisfactory. Different factors may affect outcome following complex aortic procedures. Nevertheless, close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists may reduce potential for complications and address aspects that may not be completely within the domain of individual specialists.

Midterm Results of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Reentry Closure for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection with Aneurysmal Dilatation

Objectives: This study aims to discuss the midterm results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with reentry closure for chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 13 patients with CTBAD who underwent TEVAR with reentry closure between July 2014 and December 2020. We evaluated the false lumen (FL) cross-sectional area using computed tomography images of the descending aorta at the level of the bronchial bifurcation, Valsalva sinus, celiac artery, and infrarenal abdominal aorta pre- and postoperation. The study endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, freedom from additional aortic reintervention or surgery, and survival. Results: Technical success was obtained in 12 patients (92.3%) with no hospital mortality and neurological complications. The postoperative observation period was 49.2±21.5 months. The clinical success rate was 76.9% (10 cases), and a postoperative reduction of the FL cross-sectional area was obtained in 53.8% of patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 64.8% with no aortic-related deaths while the 5-year freedom from additional aortic surgery rate was 66.7%. Conclusions: TEVAR with reentry closure suggests preventing FL dilatation or rupture in CTBAD, but the revision of our devices and further research with more patients and longer follow-up periods are required.

Initial Experience with a Modified “Candy-Plug” Technique for False Lumen Embolization in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Background

Persistent distal false lumen (FL) perfusion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) can lead to aneurysmal degeneration and an increased risk of rupture. We have presented our initial experience using a modified "candy-plug" (CP) technique for FL embolization.

Methods

From February 2021 to July 2022, we treated six patients using the modified CP technique. All the patients had undergone prior or simultaneous TEVAR for chronic TBAD with persistent FL perfusion and aneurysm expansion. Bilateral common femoral artery access was obtained, and intravascular ultrasound was used to confirm wire access in the true lumen (TL) and FL. A conformable TAG device (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) was used in four cases and an Excluder aortic cuff (W.L. Gore & Associates) in two cases. The device was modified by placing a constraining "napkin-ring" suture through the middle segment of the device. Femoral sheaths were placed in the TL and FL. A standard TL TEVAR extension was performed at the level of the celiac artery (zone 5). Next, the CP device was advanced and deployed in the FL, distally aligning it with the TL device. An appropriately sized Amplatzer II plug (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) was then deployed in the constrained segment of the modified stent graft. Completion angiography was performed to confirm successful FL embolization.

Results

Technical success was defined as successful deployment of the CP device in the FL. The technical success rate was 100% (six of six patients). Clinical success was defined as the cessation of aneurysm growth on follow-up computed tomography angiography. No 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, spinal cord ischemia, access site complications, or aortic-related reinterventions occurred. Surveillance imaging at a mean follow-up of 10 months confirmed clinical success (stable aneurysm size or shrinkage) for all five patients with follow-up data available.

Conclusions

The modified CP embolization technique is a promising solution for persistent distal FL perfusion after TEVAR for TBAD. Further investigation is required to determine the long-term durability of this technique as an adjunct to TEVAR to promote aortic remodeling.

Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Background The treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection by thoracic endovascular aortic repair has some challenges, and its long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the 5-year clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection, compare the differences between patients with and without adverse aortic events (AAEs), and identify risk factors for AAEs. Methods and Results Patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection from January 2009 to June 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end points were AAEs, including aorta-related death, procedural complications, and disease progression requiring reintervention. Clinical outcomes were described at the 5-year follow-up visit. The secondary end point was the comparison of the results between patients with and without AAEs. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for AAEs. A total of 214 patients were enrolled. AAEs occurred in 46 (21.5%) patients. Compared with patients without AAEs, those with AAEs had higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection (26.1% versus 4.2%, P<0.001) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (69.6% versus 11.3%, P<0.001), and a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis (23.9% versus 89.9%, P<0.001). Meanwhile, the median interval from symptom onset to intervention was longer in patients with AAEs (26 months versus 12 months, P=0.004). Partial or no false lumen thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.71 [95% CI, 5.67-38.14; P<0.001]) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (AOR, 10.16 [95% CI, 3.86-26.73; P<0.001]) were identified as independent risk factors for AAEs. Conclusions While thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection might be challenging in some cases, its long-term outcomes appeared promising as this treatment was effective in preventing catastrophic aortic events. Patients with AAEs showed higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm, a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis, and a longer median interval from symptom onset to intervention. Failure of complete false lumen thrombosis and an aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm were predictors of AAEs.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging

Aortic dissection is a chronic disease that requires lifelong clinical and imaging surveillance, long after the acute event. Imaging has an important role in prognosis, timing of repair, device sizing, and monitoring for complications, especially in the endovascular therapy era. Important anatomic features at preprocedural imaging include the location of the primary intimal tear and aortic zonal and branch vessel involvement, which influence the treatment strategy. Challenges of repair in the chronic phase include a small true lumen in conjunction with a stiff intimal flap, complex anatomy, and retrograde perfusion from distal reentry tears. The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains controversial for treatment of chronic aortic dissection. Standard TEVAR is aimed at excluding the primary intimal tear to decrease false lumen perfusion, induce false lumen thrombosis, promote aortic remodeling, and prevent aortic growth. In addition to covering the primary intimal tear with an endograft, several adjunctive techniques have been developed to mitigate retrograde false lumen perfusion. These techniques are broadly categorized into false lumen obliteration and landing zone optimization strategies, such as the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT), false lumen embolization, cheese-wire fenestration, and knickerbocker techniques. Familiarity with these techniques is important to recognize expected changes and complications at postintervention imaging. The authors detail imaging options, provide examples of simple and complex endovascular repairs of aortic dissections, and highlight complications that can be associated with various techniques. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Long-Term Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Dissections

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and predictors of aortic remodeling over a long-term follow-up period after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissections (TBADs).

Methods

Patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD from July 2011 to December 2013 were included, and relevant data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

After TEVAR, the true lumen (TL) dimension increased and the false lumen (FL) dimension decreased or did not change over a 5-year follow-up period in all three temporal groups. Shrinkage proportion of the thoracic aorta was the highest in the subacute group (acute, 28.1%; subacute, 39.1%; and chronic, 17.4%; p = 0.048), while abdominal expansion showed no significant differences among the groups (acute, 29.6%; subacute, 40.5%; and chronic, 44.4%; p = 0.502). The chronic group had a rate of complete FL regression, which is lower than the subacute or acute group at all anatomic sections, with significant differences only in the stented section (chronic, 21.7%; acute, 92.2%; and subacute, 80.4%; p < 0.05) and in the distal thoracic aortic section (chronic, 13.0%; acute, 31.1%; and subacute, 50.0%; p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that chronic dissection, TL compression, endoleak, the number of branches from FL, and the number of residual tears affected optimal FL remodeling.

Conclusion

The present study provides data on aortic remodeling of TBAD after TEVAR during a long-term follow-up period. The features and risk factors of aortic remodeling in the acute, subacute, and chronic phases are different in different aortic segments. These findings may have implications in the timing of TEVAR.

1-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of the Ankura II Thoracic Endoprosthesis for the Endovascular Treatment of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections

Background

The Ankura II Thoracic Stent Graft System (Lifetech, Shenzhen, China) is an evolution of the Ankura stent graft. This study reports one-year outcomes of the Ankura II Thoracic Stent Graft System for endovascular treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections.

Methods

The Ankura II Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Trial was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial conducted at 12 Chinese institutes. The enrolled patients diagnosed with Stanford type B aortic dissections (TBADs) were randomly assigned to the Ankura group or Ankura II group. Standard follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed.

Results

132 patients with TBADs were enrolled. The outcomes for the primary safety end points revealed that the Ankura II stent graft was statistically non-inferior compared to the Ankura stent graft. The 1-month device-related major adverse events (1.6 vs. 0%; p = 0.48), 1-month all-cause mortality (1.7 vs. 4.5%; p = 0.621), 12-month survival rate (95.2 ± 2.7% vs. 94.1 ± 2.9%; p = 0.769), and major adverse event (MAE) rate (5.1 vs. 4.7% at 1 month; p = 0.73 and 5.8 vs. 8.9% at 12 months; p = 0.718) of Ankura II group are all comparable to Ankura group. The two groups showed similar primary effectiveness and true lumen expansion effect, and false lumen remodeling was improved in Ankura II group (−100.0 vs. −48.5%; p = 0.08).

Conclusions

The one-year outcomes from this prospective, randomized, multicenter study demonstrate that Ankura II stent graft shows comparable results to Ankura for treating TBADs, resulting in low mortality rates, MAEs and reintervention rates.

Clinical Trial Registration

ChiCTR-TRC-12002844.

Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk

Background

The introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for total arch replacement (TAR) has revolutionized the field of aortivascular surgery by allowing hybrid repair of complex aortic pathologies in a single step through combining an open surgical approach with an endovascular one. FET has been associated with favorable aortic remodeling, however, its is also associated with development of distal stent graft induced new entry (dSINE) tears postoperatively. The rate of aortic remodeling and the incidence of dSINE have been linked together, in addition, there seems to be a relationship between these two variables and FET insetion length as well as graft size.

Aims

The scope of this review is to highlight the rate of aortic remodeling as well the incidence of dSINE associated with different FET devices available commercially. This review also aimed to investigate the relationship between aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and FET graft size.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase in order to collate all research evidence on the above mentioned variables.

Results

Thoraflex™ Hybrid Plexus seems to yield optimum aortic remodeling by promoting maximum false thrombosis as well true lumen expansion. Thoraflex Hybrid™ is also associated with the lowest incidence of dSINE post-FET relative to the other FET devices on the market. Aortic remodeling and dSINE do influence each other and are both linked with FET graft length and size.

Conclusion

The FET technique for TAR shows excellent aortic remodeling but is associated with a considerable risk of dSINE development. However, Thoraflex™ Hybrid has demonstrated itself to be the superior FET device on the aortic arch prostheses market. Since aortic remodeling, dSINE, FET insertion length and stent graft size are all interconnect, the choice of FET device length and size must be made with great care for optimum results.

Aortic Visceral Segment Instability is evident following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Anatomic remodeling within the thoracic aorta following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissections (TBAD) has been well documented, but less is known about the response of the untreated visceral aorta. This study aims to investigate visceral aortic behavior following TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD and identify associations with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective review was performed of all imaging for all patients treated with TEVAR for acute (0-14 days) and subacute (14-90 days) non-traumatic TBAD between 2006-2020. Cohort was inclusive of uncomplicated, high-risk, and complicated (defined per SVS reporting guidelines) dissections. Centerline aortic measurements of the true and false lumen and total aortic diameter (TAD) were taken at standardized locations relative to aortic anatomy within each aortic zone (zones defined by SVS reporting guidelines). Diameter changes over time were evaluated using repeated measures mixed effects linear growth modeling. Visceral segment instability (VSI) was defined as any growth in TAD ≥ 5mm within aortic zones 5 through 9.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were identified. Median length of imaging follow-up was 2.1 years (IQR 3.9 years), with 15% of the cohort having follow-up longer than 5 years. VSI was present in 55% of the cohort, with an average maximal increase in TAD of 10.4±6.3 mm over a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 3.9 years). Roughly a third of the cohort experienced rapid VSI (growth ≥5mm in first year), and 4.8% of the cohort developed a large para-visceral aneurysm aortic (TAD≥5cm) secondary to VSI. Linear growth modeling identified significant predictable growth in TAD across all visceral zones. Zones 7 had the highest rate of TAD dilation, with a fixed effect estimated rate of 1.3 mm per year (95%-CI 0.23-2.1, p=0.022). The preoperative factor most strongly associated with VSI was ≥6 cumulative number of zones dissected (OR 6.4, 95% OR 1.07-8.6, p=0.041). Odds for aortic reintervention were significantly increased in cases where VSI led to development of a para-visceral aortic aneurysm ≥5cm development (OR 3.7, 95%-CI 1.1-13, p=0.038).

CONCLUSION

VSI was identified in the majority of patients treated with TEVAR for management of acute and subacute TBAD. Preoperative anatomic features such as extent of dissection, rather than procedural details of graft coverage, may play a more significant role in VSI occurrence. Importantly, significant TAD growth occurred in all visceral segments. These results highlight the importance of lifelong surveillance following TEVAR, and identify a subset of patients that may be at increased risk for re-intervention.

Imaging and Surveillance of Chronic Aortic Dissection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

All patients surviving an acute aortic dissection require continued lifelong surveillance of their diseased aorta. Late complications, driven predominantly by chronic false lumen degeneration and aneurysm formation, often require surgical, endovascular, or hybrid interventions to treat or prevent aortic rupture. Imaging plays a central role in the medical decision-making of patients with chronic aortic dissection. Accurate aortic diameter measurements and rigorous, systematic documentation of diameter changes over time with different imaging equipment and modalities pose a range of practical challenges in these complex patients. Currently, no guidelines or recommendations for imaging surveillance in patients with chronic aortic dissection exist. In this document, we present state-of-the-art imaging and measurement techniques for patients with chronic aortic dissection and clarify the need for standardized measurements and reporting for lifelong surveillance. We also examine the emerging role of imaging and computer simulations to predict aortic false lumen degeneration, remodeling, and biomechanical failure from morphological and hemodynamic features. These insights may improve risk stratification, individualize contemporary treatment options, and potentially aid in the conception of novel treatment strategies in the future.

Aortic remodeling after false lumen occlusion using an atrial septal occluder in chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Retrograde false lumen flow through distal entry tears poses a challenge in the treatment of chronic DeBakey IIIb aneurysms. In the present report, we have described the feasibility and outcomes of false lumen occlusion using an atrial septal occluder (ASO) in chronic DeBakey IIIb dissection associated with a descending aneurysm.

METHODS

All the patients who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection at our institution from January 2014 to November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoints were technical success and in-hospital postoperative results. The secondary endpoints included the midterm survival status and aortic remodeling outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (age, 56.24 ± 10.47 years) with persistent retrograde false lumen perfusion and aneurysm formation at the thoracic segment were treated using an ASO for false lumen occlusion. We achieved 100% technical success. No spinal cord ischemia or in-hospital death was observed. The median follow-up time was 36 months (interquartile range, 24-51 months). After the procedure, three patients (8.1%) had had an endoleak (type Ia in two patients and type II in one patients), and five patients had required late reintervention. The overall 5-year survival rate was 71%. One aortic-related death (2.7% of the total cohort) occurred during follow-up at 9 months. Complete thrombosis of the false lumen along the treated aortic segment was recorded postoperatively in 34 patients (91.9%) at the final follow-up using computed tomography angiography. In a mixed-effects model, a diameter analysis revealed that the thoracic true lumen diameter had increased and the thoracic false lumen diameter had decreased significantly (0.256 mm/mo, P < .001; and -0.512 mm/mo, P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair and false lumen occlusion using the ASO to promote false lumen thrombosis and remodeling in the treated segments is a technically feasible and effective alternative treatment of chronic DeBakey IIIb dissection with an associated descending aneurysm. This approach yielded satisfactory midterm survival outcomes and a low incidence of aortic-related death in our patients. However, further studies with more subjects and a prospective design should verify our findings before routine clinical implementation of this technique.

Thoracic endovascular repair of chronic type B aortic dissection: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

At present, the optimal management strategy for chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) remains unknown, as equipoise remains regarding medical management versus endovascular treatment versus open surgery. However, the results over recent years of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in CTBAD appear promising. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the available data reporting outcomes and survival rates for TEVAR in CTBAD.

METHODS

Electronic searches of six databases were performed from inception to April 2021. All studies reporting outcomes, specifically 30-day mortality rates, for endovascular repair of CTBAD were identified. Relevant data were extracted, and a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions or means was performed to aggregate the data. Survival data were pooled using data derived from original Kaplan-Meier curves, which allows reconstruction of individual patient data.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies with 2,641 patients were identified. Early (<30 days) all-cause and aortic-related mortality rates were low at 1.6% and 0.5%, respectively. Incidence of retrograde type A dissection in the post-operative period was only 1.4%. There were also low rates of cerebrovascular accidents and spinal cord injury (1.1% and 0.9%, respectively). Late follow-up all-cause mortality was 8.0%, however, late aortic-related mortality was only 2.4%. Reintervention rates were 10.1% for endovascular and 6.7% for surgical reintervention. Pooled rates of overall survival at 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year were 91.5%, 84.7%, 77.7% and 56.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant heterogeneity in the available evidence and absence of consensus reporting standards are important considerations and concern when interpreting the data. Evaluation of the evidence suggests that TEVAR for CTBAD is a safe procedure with low rates of complications. However, the optimal treatment strategy for CTBAD remains debatable and requires further research. Evidence from high-quality registries and clinical trials are required to address these challenges.

Outcome Comparison Between Open and Endovascular Aortic Repair for Retrograde Type A Intramural Hematoma With Intimal Tear in the Descending Thoracic Aorta: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objective: The optimal treatment modality for retrograde type A intramural hematoma (IMH) remains debatable. This study evaluated and compared surgical outcomes and aortic remodeling after open aortic repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with retrograde type A IMH with a primary intimal tear or ulcer like projection in the descending aorta.

Methods: A single center, retrospective observational study was performed on patients with retrograde type A IMH undergoing either open aortic repair and TEVAR. From June 2009 and November 2019, 46 patients with retrograde type A IMH who received either open aortic repair or TEVAR at our institution were reviewed for clinical outcomes, including post-operative mortality/morbidity, re-intervention rate and aortic remodeling.

Results: 33 patients underwent open aortic repair and 13 underwent TEVAR. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 15.2 years) and 63 years (IQR 22.5 years) for the open repair group and TEVAR group, respectively. The median duration of follow-up for TEVAR patients was 37.6 months and 40.3 months for open aortic repair. No difference in the 5-year estimated freedom from all-cause mortality (82.1 vs. 87.8%, p = 0.34), re-intervention (82.5 vs. 93.8%, p = 0.08), and aortic-related mortality (88.9 vs. 90.9%, p = 0.88) were observed between the TEVAR and open repair group, respectively; however, the open repair group had a significantly higher 30-day composite morbidity (39.4 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.037). All patients from both treatment groups had complete resolution of the IMH in the ascending aorta. With regard to the descending thoracic aorta, TEVAR group had a significantly greater regression in the diameter of the false lumen or IMH thickness when compared to the open repair group [median 14mm (IQR 10.1) vs. 5mm (IQR 9.5), p < 0.001].

Conclusion: TEVAR and open aortic repair were both effective treatments for retrograde type A IMH, in which no residual ascending aortic IMH was observed during follow-up. TEVAR was also associated with lower post-operative composite morbidities and better descending aortic remodeling. In selected patients with retrograde type A IMH, TEVAR might be a safe, effective alternative treatment modality.

Secondary Interventions After TEVAR for Aortic Dissection

The goal of thoracic endograft placement in type B aortic dissection is to prevent aneurysmal degeneration and other complications. Although TEVAR is a highly effective tool for managing type B aortic dissection, many patients will require additional interventions. In this article, we present a case-based review of techniques for the management of persistent false lumen perfusion and stent-graft induced new entry tears after TEVAR for aortic dissection.

Aortic septotomy to optimize landing zones during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection remains controversial. Clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with recently implemented aortic septotomy strategy were compared with stand-alone thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2020, 88 patients with chronic type B aortic dissection and degenerative aortic aneurysm underwent a thoracic endovascular aortic repair with or without adjunctive aortic septotomy, consisting of 36 (41%) with de novo chronic type B aortic dissection and 52 (59%) with residual chronic type B aortic dissection after type A aortic dissection repair.

RESULTS

Aortic septotomy was performed in 31 patients (35%) to optimize the proximal (3/31;10%) and distal (31/31;100%) landing zones. The aortic septotomy techniques comprised laser aortic septotomy in 16 patients (52%) and cheese wire septotomy in 15 patients (48%) with a 97% overall technical success rate. The median time interval between aortic dissection occurrence and thoracic endovascular aortic repair was 1.2 years. During follow-up, there were 12 (21%) sudden deaths and 17 (30%) combined aorta-related and sudden deaths in the nonaortic septotomy group, whereas there were no deaths in the septotomy group (P < .001). Patients without aortic septotomy required aortic reinterventions more frequently than those with aortic septotomy (30% vs 7%; P = .014), and 77% of these procedures were related to residual retrograde false lumen flow. Positive aortic remodeling was confirmed in 90% and 37% in the aortic septotomy and nonseptotomy groups, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stand-alone thoracic endovascular aortic repair outcomes without adjunctive procedures for chronic type B aortic dissection remain unfavorable. In contrast, landing zone optimization using aortic septotomy resulted in a remarkably higher positive aortic remodeling rate. Routine aortic septotomy strategy may positively affect long-term chronic type B aortic dissection survival and expand thoracic endovascular aortic repair candidacy.

Shrinkage of a Giant Type-B Dissecting Aneurysm Treated by Complete False Lumen Occlusion 20 Years after Presentation: A Case Report

In this study, we report the case of a 47-year-old female who presented with extensive acute type IIIb aortic dissection and cerebral infarction. At 69 years of age, dilatation of the descending aorta was noted to be more than 70 mm with compression of the left atrium. We performed endovascular repair with distal false lumen occlusion. However, further dilatation of the descending aorta with false lumen flow from the re-entry of the common carotid artery was detected. She subsequently underwent additional proximal false lumen occlusion by embolization at the aortic arch. A year later, as per her computed tomography angiography findings, appreciable shrinkage of the descending aorta without endoleakage was observed.

Comparison of diametric and volumetric changes in Stanford type B aortic dissection patients in assessing aortic remodeling post-stent graft treatment

Background

The study aims to analyze the correlation between the maximal diameter (both axial and orthogonal) and volume changes in the true (TL) and false lumens (FL) after stent-grafting for Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Method

Computed tomography angiography was performed on 13 type B aortic dissection patients before and after procedure, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The lumens were divided into three regions: the stented area (Region 1), distal to the stent graft to the celiac artery (Region 2), and between the celiac artery and the iliac bifurcation (Region 3). Changes in aortic morphology were quantified by the increase or decrease of diametric and volumetric percentages from baseline measurements.

Results

At Region 1, the TL diameter and volume increased (pre-treatment: volume =51.4±41.9 mL, maximal axial diameter =22.4±6.8 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =21.6±7.2 mm; follow-up: volume =130.7±69.2 mL, maximal axial diameter =40.1±8.1 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =31.9+2.6 mm, P<0.05 for all comparisons), while FL decreased (pre-treatment: volume =129.6±150.5 mL; maximal axial diameter =43.0±15.8 mm; maximal orthogonal diameter =28.3±12.6 mm; follow-up: volume =66.6±95.0 mL, maximal axial diameter =24.5±19.9 mm, maximal orthogonal diameter =16.9±13.7, P<0.05 for all comparisons). Due to the uniformity in size throughout the vessel, high concordance was observed between diametric and volumetric measurements in the stented region with 93% and 92% between maximal axial diameter and volume for the true/false lumens, and 90% and 92% between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume for the true/false lumens. Large discrepancies were observed between the different measurement methods at regions distal to the stent graft, with up to 46% differences between maximal orthogonal diameter and volume.

Conclusions

Volume measurement was shown to be a much more sensitive indicator in identifying lumen expansion/shrinkage at the distal stented region.

Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVE

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion carries high morbidity and mortality. The present study was undertaken to compare the characteristics of malperfusion and uncomplicated cohorts and to evaluate the long-term differences in survival using a granular, national registry.

METHODS

Patients with TBAD entered into the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair module of the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2019 were included. The demographic, radiographic, operative, postoperative, in-hospital, and long-term reintervention data were compared between the malperfusion and uncomplicated TBAD groups using t tests and χ² analysis, as appropriate. Overall survival was compared using Cox regression to generate survival curves.

RESULTS

Of the 2820 included patients, 2267 had uncomplicated TBAD and 553 had malperfusion. The patients with malperfusion were younger (age, 55.8 vs 61.2 years; P < .001), were more often male (79.7% vs 68.1%; P < .001), had a higher preoperative creatinine (1.8 vs 1.1 mg/dL; P < .001), had more often presented with an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 4 or 5 (81.9% vs 58.4%; P < .001), and had more often presented with urgent status (77.4% vs 32.8%; P < .001). In contrast, the uncomplicated TBAD group had had more medical comorbidities, including coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a larger aortic diameter (4.0 cm vs 4.9 cm; P < .001). The malperfusion group more frequently had proximal zones of disease in zones 0 to 2 (38.6% vs 31.5%; P = .002) and distal zones of disease in zones 9 and above (78.7% vs 46.2%; P < .001), with a greater number of aortic zones traversed (7.7 vs 5.1; P < .001) and a greater frequency of dissection extension into branch vessels (61.8% vs 23.1%; P < .001). Patients with malperfusion also exhibited greater case complexity, with a greater need for branch vessel stenting and longer procedure times. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was greater in the malperfusion group (39.4% vs 17.1%; P < .001) and included a greater rate of spinal cord ischemia (6.3% vs 2.2%; P < .001), acute kidney injury (10.4% vs 0.9%; P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs 5.6%; P < .001). In-hospital reintervention was also greater for the malperfusion patients (14.5% vs 7.4%; P < .001), although the incidence of long-term reinterventions was similar between the two groups (8.7% vs 9.7%; P = .548). A proximal zone of disease in zone 0 to 2 was associated with decreased survival. In contrast, a distal zone of disease in 9 and above, in-hospital reintervention, and long-term follow-up were associated with increased survival. Despite these differences, long-term survival did not differ between the malperfusion and uncomplicated groups (P = .320.) CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with TBAD and malperfusion represent a unique cohort. Despite the greater need for branch vessel stenting and in-hospital reintervention, they had similar long-term reintervention rates and survival compared with those with uncomplicated TBAD. These data lend insight with regard to the observed differences between uncomplicated and malperfusion TBAD.

Adjunctive false lumen intervention for chronic aortic dissections is safe but offers unclear benefit

OBJECTIVE

Adjunctive false lumen embolization (FLE) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with chronic aortic dissection is thought to induce FL thrombosis and favorable aortic remodeling. However, these data are derived from small single-institution experiences and the potential benefit of FLE remains unproven. In this study, we examined perioperative and midterm outcomes of patients with aortic dissection undergoing concomitant TEVAR and FLE.* METHODS: Patients 18 or older who underwent TEVAR for chronic aortic dissection with known FLE status in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database between January 2010 and February 2020 were included. Ruptured patients and emergent procedures were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative details and outcomes were analyzed by group: TEVAR with or without FLE. Primary outcomes were in-hospital post-operative complications and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included follow-up mean maximum aortic diameter change, rates of false lumen thrombosis, re-intervention rates, and mortality.

RESULTS

884 patients were included: 46 had TEVAR/FLE and 838 had TEVAR alone. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior aortic interventions, mean maximum pre-operative aortic diameter (5.1cm vs. 5.0cm, P=0.43), presentation symptomatology, or intervention indication. FLE was associated with significantly longer procedural times (178min vs. 146min, P=0.0002), increased contrast use (134mL vs. 113mL, P=0.02), and prolonged fluoroscopy time (34min vs. 21min, P<0.0001). However, FLE was not associated with a significant difference in post-operative complications (17.4% vs. 13.8%, P=0.51), length of stay (6.5 vs. 5.7 days, P=0.18), or in-hospital all-cause mortality (0% vs. 1.3%, P=1). In mid-term follow-up (median 15.5months, IQR 2.2-36.2 months), all-cause mortality trended lower, but was not significant (2.2% vs. 7.8%); and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in overall survival between groups (P=0.23). By Cox regression analysis, post-operative complications had the strongest independent association with all-cause mortality (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.56-4.5, P<0.001). In patients with available follow-up imaging and re-intervention status, mean aortic diameter change (n=337, -0.71cm vs. -0.69cm, P=0.64) and re-intervention rates (n=487, 10% vs. 11.4%, P=1) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive FLE, despite increased procedural times, can be performed safely for patients with chronic dissection without significantly higher overall perioperative morbidity or mortality. TEVAR/FLE demonstrates trends for improved survival and increased rates of FL thrombosis in the treated thoracic segment; however, given the lack of evidence to suggest a significant reduction in re-intervention rates or induction of more favorable aortic remodeling compared to TEVAR alone, the overall utility of this technique in practice remains unclear. Further investigation is needed to determine the most appropriate role for FLE in managing chronic aortic dissections.

Early outcomes associated with use of the Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Graft for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short term outcomes related to the use of the Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Graft (ZDEG) and the Zenith Dissection Bare stent (ZDES) for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter case cohort study collated data from 10 European institutions for patients with both complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection treated with ZDEG and ZDES between 2011 and 2018. The primary end point was mortality at 30 and 90 days. Secondary end points included complications related to TEVAR, such as, type Ia endoleak, stroke, paraparesis, paraplegia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). Statistical analysis was carried out using the t test, or one-way analysis of variance and the χ² or Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

We treated 120 patients (87 male; mean age, 62.7 ± 12.2years) either in the acute 76 (63.3%), subacute 16 (13.3%), or chronic 28 (23.3%) phase. Seven patients (5.8%) died within 30 days after the index procedure and two (1.7%) between 30 and 90 days. There was one instance of postoperative RTAD in a patient treated for rupture. Stroke and paraplegia occurred in three (2.5%) and five (4.2%), patients, respectively. Eight patients (6.7%) had a type Ia endoleak in the perioperative period. There were no instances of paraplegia, no permanent dialysis, and no requirement for adjunctive superior mesenteric or celiac artery stenting in the 33 patients (27.5%) who were treated by concurrent placement of ZDES distal to the ZDEG. The length and distal oversizing of ZDEG components used was less in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present series demonstrates a low (<1%) RTAD rate and favorable morbidity and mortality. The lower rate of paraplegia, dialysis, and visceral artery stenting in the cohort that had adjunctive use of ZDES is compelling and merits further assessment.

Technique-Based Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodelling Following TEVAR in Acute and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and aortic remodelling rates following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute or subacute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All TEVARs for acute/subacute TBAD between 01/01/2008 and 01/06/2020 were included. TEVARS were grouped by technique (TEVAR only, PETTICOAT and STABILISE). Aortic remodelling was assessed at three aortic levels on follow-up CT. Thirty-day technical/clinical success rates, re-intervention rates and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were included. The median age was 55 years (31-82). The median duration from initial presentation to TEVAR was 7 days (0-84). Intra-procedural complications included one aortic rupture from balloon moulding in a STABILISE case. Thirty-day mortality, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia and visceral ischaemia were 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1), 3% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 1), respectively. (All occurred in acute TBAD.) Overall survival was 50.5 months (18-115). Median follow-up was 31 months (1-115). Six patients (21%) required re-intervention, with a median time of 5 months (5-46) from first TEVAR. Overall complete aortic remodelling rates were: 89% at the proximal descending thoracic aorta, 78% at the distal thoracic aorta and 50% at the infra-renal abdominal aorta. At the infra-renal aorta, the STABILISE group (n = 11) had a higher complete aortic remodelling rate (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (n = 12) (20%).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular intervention for acute and subacute TBAD is safe with a high rate of technical success. STABILISE results in higher aortic remodelling at the infra-renal aorta (82%) compared to TEVAR alone (20%) but risks aortic rupture from balloon moulding.

Outcomes of open repairs of chronic distal aortic dissection anatomically amenable to endovascular repairs

OBJECTIVE

To review short-term outcomes and long-term survival and durability after open surgical repairs for chronic distal aortic dissections in patients whose anatomy was amenable to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

Between February 1991 and August 2017, we repaired chronic distal dissections in 697 patients. Of those patients, we enrolled 427 with anatomy amenable to TEVAR, which included 314 descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs) and 105 extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). One hundred eighty-five patients (44%) had a history of type A dissection, and 33 (7.9%) had a previous DTAA/TAAA repair. Variables were assessed with logistic regression for 30-day mortality and Cox regression for long-term mortality. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 8.4% (n = 36). In all, 22 patients (5.2%) developed motor deficit (paraplegia/paraparesis), and 17 (4.0%) experienced stroke. Multivariable analysis identified low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), previous DTAA/TAAA repair, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as associated with 30-day mortality. Patients without all 3 risk factors had a 30-day mortality rate of 2.6%. During a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 160 patients died. The survival rate was 81% at 1 year and 61% at 10 years. Cox regression analysis identified preoperative aortic rupture, eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m², previous DTAA/TAAA repair, COPD, and age >60 years as predictive of long-term mortality. Forty-five patients required subsequent aortic procedures, including 8 reinterventions to the treated segment. Freedom from any aortic procedures was 85% at 10 years, and aortic procedure-free survival was 45% at 10 years. Hereditary aortic disease was the sole predictor for any aortic interventions (hazard ratio, 3.2; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgical repair provided satisfactory low neurologic complication rates and durable repairs in chronic distal aortic dissection. Patients without low eGFR, redo, and COPD are the low-risk surgical candidates and may benefit from open surgical repair at centers with similar experience to ours. Patients with hereditary aortic disease warrant close surveillance.

[Hybrid treatment of a patient with dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and single kidney]

Presented herein is a clinical case report regarding a repeat intervention for a type II dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated by means of a hybrid technique in a 76-year-old male patient with a single kidney, having 9 years previously endured resection of an aneurysm of the infrarenal aortic portion. The first stage consisted in prosthetic repair of the thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm by an oblique anastomosis, with the second stage (7 days thereafter) being endoprosthetic repair of the descending thoracic aorta. The findings of check-up computed tomography at 16 months postoperatively demonstrated no negative dynamics.

Endovascular strategies for post-dissection aortic aneurysm (PDAA)

Residual patent false lumen (FL) after type B aortic dissection (TBAD) repair is independently associated with poor long-term survival. Open surgery and endovascular repair result in good clinical outcomes in patients with AD. However, both treatments focus on proximal dissection but not distal dissection. About 13.4–62.5% of these patients present with different degrees of distal aneurysmal dilatation after primary repair. Although open surgery is the first-choice treatment for post-dissection aortic aneurysm (PDAA), there is a need for high technical demand since open surgery is associated with high mortality and morbidity. As a treatment strategy with minimal invasion, endovascular repair shows early benefits and low morbidity. For PDAA, the narrow true lumen (TL), rigid initial flap and branch arteries originating from FL have increased difficulties in operation. The aim of endovascular treatment is to promote FL thrombosis and aortic remodeling. Endovascular repair includes intervention from FL and TL sides. TL intervention techniques (parallel stent-graft, branched and fenestrated stent-graft among others) have been proven to be safe and effective in PDAA. Other FL intervention techniques that have been used in selected patients include FL embolization and candy-plug techniques. This article introduces available endovascular techniques and their outcomes for the treatment of PDAA.

Clinical and Morphologic Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Subacute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to assess long-term remodeling, survival, and reintervention outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for subacute and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEVAR for subacute or chronic TBAD at a tertiary referral center between 1999 and 2015 were included in this cohort study. The primary outcome was aortic remodeling, and secondary outcomes included survival, rate of major complications, and reinterventions.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included, with mean age of 62.4 years, 10 (20%) DeBakey type IIIA and 40 (80%) DeBakey type IIIB dissection; 45 standard TEVAR, 2 branched TEVAR, 3 TEVAR combined with fenestrated or branched EVAR. Indication for TEVAR was intact (n = 40) or ruptured (n = 1) postdissection aneurysm, hypoperfusion (n = 4), treatment-refractory pain (n = 2), or a combination (n = 3). Mean clinical follow-up was 76 months, and median radiological follow-up was 46 months. Thirty-day survival was 96%, stroke 4%, renal failure 0%, paraplegia 0%. Three- and five-year survival was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) [79; 97]) and 77% (95% CI [61; 87]), respectively. Of 19 late deaths, 6 were confirmed aorta related. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 69% (95% CI [53-80]). Distal stent graft extension due to aortic dilatation composed most reinterventions. Mean maximal aortic diameter was 58.7 mm preoperatively and 51.9 mm on last follow-up (P = 0.003). On thoracic level, true lumen expanded (+10.0 mm, 95% CI [6.4; 13.6]) (P < 0.001) and false lumen decreased (-11.9 mm, 95% CI [-15.2; -8.5]) (P < 0.001) from baseline to the last computed tomography. In the abdominal aorta, true lumen diameter change was +3.1 mm (95% CI [1.4; 4.8]) (P = 0.001); false lumen diameter change was +1.0 mm (95% CI [-1.8; 3.8]) (P = 0.464).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for subacute and chronic TBAD results in favorable remodeling of the thoracic but not the abdominal aorta. Five-year survival is almost 80%, but late aortic deaths still occur. Aortic dilatation distal to the treated segment requiring reintervention is common, emphasizing the importance of follow-up.

Laser aortic septotomy during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Persistent false lumen perfusion due to the presence of a thick aortic septum is a significant obstacle to successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD). We describe our new approach of laser aortic septotomy to optimize the landing zone.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2020, 11 patients with cTBAD with degenerative aneurysm underwent laser aortic septotomy during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age was 70.0 years, and 10 (91%) were men. Six (55%) were de novo type B aortic dissection and 5 (45%) were residual type B aortic dissection. The age of aortic dissection was 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.1-12.1). Technical success was achieved in 91% (10/11). In 1 case (9%), laser aortic septotomy was not feasible due to extremely tortuous aorta. Among successful cases, the median extents of proximal and distal laser fenestrations were Th7.5 and Th11.0, respectively and distal landing zones included zone 4 (40%) and zone 5 (60%). Two (18%) underwent a continuous longitudinal laser fenestration, and 8 (73%) had longitudinal spot laser fenestrations with immediate balloon dilatations. Apposition of the stent-graft to the outer aortic wall of the newly created common aortic lumen with elimination of retrograde false lumen flow was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first description using the laser technology to optimize the distal landing zone for cTBAD. This new technique is safe and reproducible, with excellent controllability to achieve aortic septotomy at the desired target aorta segment.

Late Aortic Expansion After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic DeBakey IIIb Dissection

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection is still under discussion. This study was performed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for late aortic expansion after TEVAR for chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection.

METHODS

From March 2014 to April 2019, a total of 35 patients with chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection underwent TEVAR in our institution. Risk factors for aortic expansion events were examined by stepwise Cox regression analysis. Aortic expansion events were defined as reintervention for expansion or aortic expansion of greater than 5 mm.

RESULTS

No operative death occurred, and the 2-year survival rate was 96.8%. The 1- and 2-year rates of freedom from reintervention were 87.8% and 80.2%, respectively. During follow-up, 11 patients had late aortic expansion events (4 with expansion of the thoracic aorta and 7 with expansion of the abdominal aorta). The 1- and 2-year rates of freedom from aortic expansion were 87.8% and 68.7%, respectively. Significant risk factors for expansion events were aortic dilation at the celiac level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P = .015), saccular aneurysm formation of the false lumen (HR, 5.08; P = .049), and high number of residual large reentries (>5 mm) (HR, 2.78; P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TEVAR for chronic DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection, late aortic expansion in both the thoracic and abdominal aorta remains an important issue. Aggressive additional intervention should be considered for high-risk patients with residual large reentries and aortic dilation at the celiac level.

Management of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

Acute aortic dissection has an incidence of approximately half that of symptomatic abdominal and thoracic aneurysm of the aorta and more than twice the mortality of population-based controls. While urgent undelayed open surgery is the strategy of choice in proximal dissection, medical management has been the mainstay of treatment for uncomplicated distal or type B aortic dissection, but endovascular intervention is now considered a potential treatment option for all type B dissection due to its success in complicated cases. Endovascular repair can be technically demanding in aortic dissection, and timing of the repair can have a significant influence on anatomical and clinical outcome. Observational reports of feasibility and reasonable safety are flanked by only two randomised trials; the Acute Dissection Stent Grafting or Best Medical Treatment (ADSORB) trial demonstrated improved remodelling in acute dissection and the INvestigation of STEnt grafts in patients with type B Aortic Dissections (INSTEAD) trial showed better long-term survival in patients treated endovascularly in the subacute phase. Meta-analyses and other large clinical studies have demonstrated mixed results. Due to some risks associated endovascular repair and the requirement of specialist aortic care (which is not always available), a pragmatic approach for current management could involve high intensity serial imaging in the acute phase of a type B aortic dissection, thereby identifying complicated cases for early intervention and selection of patients at high risk of disease progression for deferred endovascular management in the subacute phase within 90 days.

Outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair for chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal degeneration after acute dissection occurs in a significant proportion of patients. Fenestrated and branched stent-grafting (F/BEVAR) has been increasingly used to treat these post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA). The aim of this study was to report early and mid-term outcomes of F/BEVAR in PD-TAAA.

METHODS

Retrospective single center analysis of a prospectively maintained database including all patients undergoing F/BEVAR for PD-TAAA between October 2010-February 2020.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (45 males, mean age 66±10 years) were included. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Thirty-day mortality was two (3.6%) patients. Major perioperative complications were noted in nine (16.4%) patients including five (9.1%) with transient spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and one (1.8%) with permanent paraplegia. Mean follow-up was 24 months (1-76 months). Cumulative survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 87±5.5%, 83.5±6.3% and 72.2±8.1%, respectively. Estimated freedom from reintervention at 12, 24 and 36 months was 82.2±6.7%, 60.1±9.2% and 55.9±9.5%, respectively. Main reasons for reintervention were endoleaks from target vessels and common iliac arteries. Estimated target vessel patency at 12, 24 and 36 months was 97.8±1.2%, 95.4±2.1%, and 94.1±2.4%, respectively. Mean aneurysm sac regression during follow-up was 7.9±7.1 mm, with complete false lumen thrombosis in 80% of patients. No ruptures occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

F/BEVAR for PD-TAAA is associated with low perioperative mortality and morbidity in a large volume endovascular center. Mid-term results demonstrate a high rate of aneurysm sac regression. Extended sealing with longer bridging stents for target vessels is recommended.

Preoperative distal aortic diameter is a significant predictor of late aorta-related events after endovascular repair for chronic type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

Long-term therapeutic effects of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic type B aortic dissection remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the possible predictors of late aortic rupture and re-interventions after TEVAR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the operative outcomes of 40 patients who underwent TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissection at Kyushu University Hospital. During a mean follow-up period of 39.2 months, we assessed aortic morphology via computed tomography and then employed a multivariable Cox regression analysis in an attempt to identify the predictors of late aorta-related events.

RESULTS

The early success rate of TEVAR was 100%. During the follow-up, however, three patients died from aortic rupture. Eight patients required aortic re-intervention, including thoraco-abdominal aortic graft replacement, repeated TEVAR, total arch replacement and EVAR. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the preoperative maximum distal aortic diameter was a significant predictor of late aorta-related events. The cutoff value of the distal aortic diameter was 40 mm. Freedom from aorta-related events was 94.6% at 1 year and 78.3% at 3 years. The survival rate was not significantly different despite the re-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR is an effective treatment for chronic type B dissection, with acceptable mid-term results. The preoperative distal aortic diameter is a significant risk factor for late aorta-related events. When the maximum distal aortic diameter is ≥ 40 mm, a therapeutic strategy should be developed taking into consideration the possible need for aortic re-intervention.

Long-Term Outcomes of Open Surgery and Stent Graft Treatment in Patients Undergoing Repeat Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair from Previous Anastomosis Site

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of open surgery and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients undergoing repeat thoracic aortic repair from previous anastomosis site.

Methods: From January 2009 to December 2017, 68 patients needed repeat aortic surgery from previous anastomosis site. Twenty-three patients had dissected distal aorta and 45 patients had non-dissected distal aorta. Early and long-term outcomes of open surgery and TEVAR were compared in both groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient background between the two treatments in both groups. Open surgery was associated with longer intensive care unit stay, but there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality in both groups. In patients with dissected distal aorta, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality (p=0.73). However, TEVAR was associated with higher risk of reintervention (p=0.038). In non-dissected distal aorta patients, acute kidney injury (p=0.002) and prolonged ventilation (p=0.032) were more often observed in open surgery. However, there were no significant differences in long-term mortality (p=0.23) and freedom from reintervention (p=0.13).

Conclusions: Long-term outcomes were similar between open surgery and TEVAR in both groups. However, TEVAR in patients with dissected distal aorta was associated with higher risk, for reintervention.