AI-powered assessment of biomarkers for growth prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Objective

The purpose of this study was to employ biomechanics-based biomarkers to locally characterize abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) tissue and investigate their relation to local aortic growth by means of an artificial intelligence model.

Methods

The study focused on a population of 36 patients with AAAs undergoing serial monitoring with electrocardiogram-gated multiphase computed tomography angiography acquisitions. The geometries of the aortic lumen and wall were reconstructed from the baseline scans and used for the baseline assessment of regional aortic weakness with three functional biomarkers, time-averaged wall-shear stress, in vivo principal strain, and intra-luminal thrombus thickness. The biomarkers were encoded as regional averages on axial and circumferential sections perpendicularly to the aortic centerline. Local diametric growth was obtained as difference in diameter between baseline and follow-up at the level of each axial section. An artificial intelligence model was developed to predict accelerated aneurysmal growth with the Extra Trees algorithm used as a binary classifier where the positive class represented regions that grew more than 2.5 mm/year. Additional clinical biomarkers, such as maximum aortic diameter at baseline, were also investigated as predictors of growth.

Results

The area under the curve for the constructed receiver operating characteristic curve for the Extra Trees classifier showed a very good performance in predicting relevant aortic growth (area under the curve = 0.92), with the three biomechanics-based functional biomarkers being objectively selected as the main predictors of growth.

Conclusions

The use of features based on the functional and local characterization of the aortic tissue resulted in a superior performance in terms of growth prediction when compared with models based on geometrical assessments. With rapid growth linked to increasing risk for patients with AAAs, the ability to access functional information related to tissue weakening and disease progression at baseline has the potential to support early clinical decisions and improve disease management.

Deep-learning method for fully automatic segmentation of the abdominal aortic aneurysm from computed tomography imaging

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. AAAs often remain asymptomatic until they are either close to rupturing or they cause pressure to the spine and/or other organs. Fast progression has been linked to future clinical outcomes. Therefore, a reliable and efficient system to quantify geometric properties and growth will enable better clinical prognoses for aneurysms. Different imaging systems can be used to locate and characterize an aneurysm; computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice in many clinical centers to monitor later stages of the disease and plan surgical treatment. The lack of accurate and automated techniques to segment the outer wall and lumen of the aneurysm results in either simplified measurements that focus on few salient features or time-consuming segmentation affected by high inter- and intra-operator variability. To overcome these limitations, we propose a model for segmenting AAA tissues automatically by using a trained deep learning-based approach. The model is composed of three different steps starting with the extraction of the aorta and iliac arteries followed by the detection of the lumen and other AAA tissues. The results of the automated segmentation demonstrate very good agreement when compared to manual segmentation performed by an expert.

Linking Aortic Mechanical Properties, Gene Expression and Microstructure: A New Perspective on Regional Weakening in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Background: Current clinical practice for the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is based on vessel diameter and does not account for the multifactorial, heterogeneous remodeling that results in the regional weakening of the aortic wall leading to aortic growth and rupture. The present study was conducted to determine correlations between a novel non-invasive surrogate measure of regional aortic weakening and the results from invasive analyses performed on corresponding ex vivo aortic samples. Tissue samples were evaluated to classify local wall weakening and the likelihood of further degeneration based on non-invasive indices.

Methods: A combined, image-based fluid dynamic and in-vivo strain analysis approach was used to estimate the Regional Aortic Weakness (RAW) index and assess individual aortas of AAA patients prior to elective surgery. Nine patients were treated with complete aortic resection allowing the systematic collection of tissue samples that were used to determine regional aortic mechanics, microstructure and gene expression by means of mechanical testing, microscopy and transcriptomic analyses.

Results: The RAW index was significantly higher for samples exhibiting lower mechanical strength (p = 0.035) and samples classified as low elastin content (p = 0.020). Samples with higher RAW index had the greatest number of genes differentially expressed compared to any constitutive metric. High RAW samples showed a decrease in gene expression for elastin and a down-regulation of pathways responsible for cell movement, reorganization of cytoskeleton, and angiogenesis.

Conclusions: This work describes the first AAA index free of assumptions for material properties and accounting for patient-specific mechanical behavior in relation to aneurysm strength. Use of the RAW index captured biomechanical changes linked to the weakening of the aorta and revealed changes in microstructure and gene expression. This approach has the potential to provide an improved tool to aid clinical decision-making in the management of aortic pathology.

Case Study: Intra-Patient Heterogeneity of Aneurysmal Tissue Properties

Introduction: Current recommendations for surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) rely on the assessment of aortic diameter as a marker for risk of rupture. The use of aortic size alone may overlook the role that vessel heterogeneity plays in aneurysmal progression and rupture risk. The aim of the current study was to investigate intra-patient heterogeneity of mechanical and fluid mechanical stresses on the aortic wall and wall tissue histopathology from tissue collected at the time of surgical repair. Methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to predict the mechanical wall stress and the wall shear stress fields for a non-ruptured aneurysm 2 weeks prior to scheduled surgery. During open repair surgery one specimen partitioned into different regions was collected from the patient's diseased aorta according to a pre-operative map. Histological analysis and mechanical testing were performed on the aortic samples and the results were compared with the predicted stresses. Results: The preoperative simulations highlighted the presence of altered local hemodynamics particularly at the proximal segment of the left anterior area of the aneurysm. Results from the post-operative assessment on the surgical samples revealed a considerable heterogeneity throughout the aortic wall. There was a positive correlation between elastin fragmentation and collagen content in the media. The tensile tests demonstrated a good prediction of the locally varying constitutive model properties predicted using geometrical variables, i.e., wall thickness and thrombus thickness. Conclusions: The observed large regional differences highlight the local response of the tissue to both mechanical and biological factors. Aortic size alone appears to be insufficient to characterize the large degree of heterogeneity in the aneurysmal wall. Local assessment of wall vulnerability may provide better risk of rupture predictions.

Is There a Role for Biomechanical Engineering in Helping to Elucidate the Risk Profile of the Thoracic Aorta?

Clinical estimates of rupture and dissection risk of thoracic aortic aneurysms are based on nonsophisticated measurements of maximum diameter and growth rate. The use of aortic size alone may overlook the role that vessel heterogeneity plays in assessing the risk of catastrophic complications. Biomechanics may help provide a more nuanced approach to predict the behavior of thoracic aortic aneurysms. In this report, we review modeling studies with an emphasis on mechanical and fluid dynamics analyses. We identify open problems and highlight the future possibility of a multidisciplinary approach that includes biomechanics and imaging to evaluate the likelihood of rupture or dissection.