A 14-year Experience with Aortic Endograft Infection: Management and Results

Contemporary Experience of the Neo-Aortoiliac System (NAIS) Procedure: A Case Series with Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a life-threatening complication that can result in death, amputation, sepsis, aorto-enteric fistula, and pseudoaneurysm formation. After explantation of the infected graft, options for reconstruction include extra-anatomic bypass or in-line reconstruction using antibiotic-coated prosthetic graft, cryopreserved allograft, or a neo-aortoiliac system (NAIS) using autogenous femoral veins. While the NAIS procedure has shown promising results, there is relatively limited clinical experience due the magnitude and morbidity of the surgery. In this study, we reviewed our single-center experience using the NAIS procedure and performed a systematic review of the contemporary literature more than the past decade.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing NAIS reconstruction with autogenous femoral vein conduits at a single institution from 2010 to 2022. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies published from 2012 to 2022 to identify those reporting on outcomes of patients undergoing the NAIS procedure. Outcome variables included early and late mortality, major complications including amputation, graft or conduit related complications, re-infection, and re-intervention. Additional variables collected include patient demographics, operative technique, and follow up.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients included in our case series with 30-day mortality of 21%. At a mean follow up of 22 months, complication rate was 64.3%, re-intervention rate was 14.3%, re-infection rate was 7.1%, and amputation rate was 7.1%. On review of the literature, 12 studies ultimately met criteria to be included in analysis with a combined total of 368 patients. Pooled averages included 30-day mortality of 9.0%, re-intervention rate of 20.5%, re-infection rate of 5.6%, and amputation rate of 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NAIS procedure for management of AGI is a formidable procedure with significant early mortality and morbidity. This treatment should be considered in the context of other revascularization options for management of an AGI.

Early Results and Feasibility of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using 3-Vessel Company-Manufactured and Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts

OBJECTIVE

Total endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms is feasible in select patients. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of total endovascular arch repair using 3-vessel company-manufactured devices (CMDs) and physician-modified endo grafts (PMEGs).

METHODS

Patients unfit for open repair who underwent 3-vessel total arch repair at a single institution from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Patients received either 3-vessel inner-branch CMDs or PMEGs. Three-vessel designs were used to incorporate the innominate, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries. The antegrade inner branches in both devices were accessed via right brachial or carotid approach. The left carotid was accessed via carotid cutdown or femoral approach. The left subclavian artery was accessed via transfemoral approach. The study endpoints included procedural technical success, patient survival, neurologic events, cardiac complications, reinterventions, and target artery patency.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent treatment. Four patients were treated with PMEGs, and 5 with CMDs. Procedural technical success was 100%. There were no in-hospital deaths. There were no strokes, transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, or spinal ischemia in the perioperative period. Major adverse events occurred in 3 patients (33%). Two (22%) vascular access complications and one (11%) acute kidney injury occurred. One (11%) patient required early reintervention for an access complication. The median follow-up period was 358 days (CMD, 392 days; PMEG, 198 days). There was a late reintervention and conversion to open repair at 142 days of follow-up in a patient with a PMEG that developed an aortic infection, leading to death on postoperative day 239. The mean length of stay was 7±4 days. Computed tomography imaging obtained during the immediate postoperative period revealed endoleak in 6 (66%) patients, out of which 5 resolved spontaneously and 1 required reintervention via left subclavian artery stenting. Target artery patency was 100% at the end of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-vessel total endovascular aortic arch repair using a CMD or PMEG is feasible with optimal early outcomes. Physician-modified stent-grafts are a feasible option for patients who do not meet anatomic criteria for CMDs.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Management of aortic arch disease remains a significant challenge in vascular surgery. This study showcases the feasibility and safety of using a total endovascular approach to repair the aortic arch, which could potentially reduce morbidity and mortality associated with traditional surgical approaches. The results suggest that this minimally invasive technique could be an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients and could significantly improve outcomes for those requiring aortic arch repair. Overall, this study represents a promising development in the field of endovascular surgery and highlights the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Treatment of Aorto-iliac and Infrainguinal Vascular Infections with a Prefabricated Bovine Pericardial Graft

BACKGROUND

The use of biological grafts provides acceptable mid- and long-term results in native or prosthetic vascular infections. Several reports describe the successful use of bovine pericardium in case of vascular infections, mainly as a large patch to be sutured as a tubular graft. Recently, a novel prefabricated bovine pericardium graft (Biointegral Surgical No-React® Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada) has been introduced in clinical practice with promising results. In this study, we report our preliminary experience utilizing Biointegral Surgical graft in case of native and or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with native or prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infection who underwent in situ reconstruction (ISR) with a Biointegral Surgical No-React bovine pericardium prosthesis between October 2020 and February 2023 at the Vascular Surgery Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli - IRCCS in Rome, Italy. All patients followed a standardized protocol including postoperative anticoagulation and long-term intravenous antibiotics.

RESULTS

The indication for surgery was: mycotic aortic aneurysm in 4 patients (20%), graft infection after abdominal aortic repair in 11 patients (55%), peripheral graft infection in 5 patients (25%). Complete excision of the infected aorta or prosthetic graft, surgical debridement and ISR were performed in all patients. Hospital mortality rate was 5% (n = 1) and graft-related mortality of 0%. During follow-up (median 13 months, range 6-34 months), reinfection was 5.2% and primary graft patency 94.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of prefabricated bovine pericardial grafts represents a promising option for the treatment of native and prosthetic aorto-iliac and infrainguinal infections. The application of this biological graft with a standardized postoperative protocol has been associated with a satisfactory patency and reinfection rate without increased bleeding complications.

Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Microbiologic diagnosis of implant-associated infections

SUMMARYImplant-associated infections (IAIs) pose serious threats to patients and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These infections may be difficult to diagnose due, in part, to biofilm formation on device surfaces, and because even when microbes are found, their clinical significance may be unclear. Despite recent advances in laboratory testing, IAIs remain a diagnostic challenge. From a therapeutic standpoint, many IAIs currently require device removal and prolonged courses of antimicrobial therapy to effect a cure. Therefore, making an accurate diagnosis, defining both the presence of infection and the involved microorganisms, is paramount. The sensitivity of standard microbial culture for IAI diagnosis varies depending on the type of IAI, the specimen analyzed, and the culture technique(s) used. Although IAI-specific culture-based diagnostics have been described, the challenge of culture-negative IAIs remains. Given this, molecular assays, including both nucleic acid amplification tests and next-generation sequencing-based assays, have been used. In this review, an overview of these challenging infections is presented, as well as an approach to their diagnosis from a microbiologic perspective.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are a rare, complex and life-threatening complication following aortic repair. Traditional treatment strategy has been with open aortic repair (OAR), with emergence of endovascular repair (EVAR) as a potentially viable initial treatment option. Controversy exists over optimal immediate and long-term management.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients who had been treated for SAEF between 2003 and 2020 were identified using a standardized database. Baseline characteristics, presenting features, microbiological, operative, and post-operative variables were recorded. The primary outcomes were short and mid-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, binomial regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox age-adjusted survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Across 5 tertiary centres, a total of 47 patients treated for SAEF were included, 7 were female and the median (range) age at presentation was 74 years (48-93). In this cohort, 24 (51%) patients were treated with initially with OAR, 15 (32%) with EVAR-first and 8 (17%) non-operatively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality for all cases that underwent intervention was 21% and 46% respectively. Age-adjusted survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality in the EVAR-first group compared to the OAR-first group, HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

In this study there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients who had OAR or EVAR as first line treatment for SAEF. In the acute setting, alongside broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, EVAR can be considered as an initial treatment for patients with SAEF, as a primary treatment or a bridge to definitive OAR.

Aortic Endograft Infection: Diagnosis and Management

Aortic endograft infection (AEI) is a rare but life-threatening complication of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The clinical features of AEI range from generalized weakness and mild fever to fatal aortic rupture or sepsis. The diagnosis of AEI usually depends on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria are often used to diagnose AEI. Surgical removal of the infected endograft, restoration of aortic blood flow, and antimicrobial therapy are the main components of AEI treatment. After removing an infected endograft, in situ aortic reconstruction is often performed instead of an extra-anatomic bypass. Various biological and prosthetic aortic grafts have been used in aortic reconstruction to avoid reinfection, rupture, or occlusion. Each type of graft has its own merits and disadvantages. In patients with an unacceptably high surgical risk and no evidence of an aortic fistula, conservative treatment can be an alternative. Treatment results are determined by bacterial virulence, patient status, including the presence of an aortic fistula, and hospital factors. Considering the severity of this condition, the best strategy is prevention. When encountering a patient with AEI, current practice emphasizes a multidisciplinary team approach to achieve an optimal outcome.

How to combine CTA, 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?

PURPOSE

We aimed at comparing 99mTc-HMPAO white blood cells (99mTc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, we attempted to define a new visual score for interpreting [18F]FDG PET/CT scans aiming at increasing its specificity.

METHODS

We prospectively compared 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT, [18F]FDG PET/CT, and CTA in 26 patients with suspected abdominal VGEI. WBC scans were performed and interpreted according to EANM recommendations. [18F]FDG PET/CT studies were assessed with both qualitative (Sah's scale and new visual score) and semi-quantitative analyses. CTA images were interpreted according to MAGIC criteria. Microbiology, histopathology or a clinical follow-up of at least 24 months were used to achieve final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Eleven out of 26 patients were infected. [18F]FDG PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and NPV, with both scoring systems, thus representing an efficient tool to rule out the infection. The use of a more detailed scoring system provided statistically higher specificity compared to the previous Sah's scale (p = 0.049). 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT provided statistically higher specificity and PPV than [18F]FDG PET/CT, regardless the interpretation criteria used and it can be, therefore, used in early post-surgical phases or to confirm or rule out a PET/CT finding.

CONCLUSIONS

After CTA, patients with suspected late VGEI should perform a [18F]FDG PET/CT given its high sensitivity and NPV. However, given its lower specificity, positive results should be confirmed with 99mTc-WBC scintigraphy. The use of a more detailed scoring system reduces the number of 99mTc-WBC scans needed after [18F]FDG PET/CT. Nevertheless, in suspected infections within 4 months from surgery, 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT should be performed as second exam, due to its high accuracy in differentiating sterile inflammation from infection.

Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With Concomitant Acute Cholecystitis in the Era of Endovascular Surgery

The incidence of symptomatic acute cholecystitis with large (greater than 5.5 cm) abdominal aortic aneurysm is an uncommon occurrence. Guidelines on concomitant repair in this setting remain elusive, particularly in the era of endovascular repair. We present a case of acute cholecystitis in a 79-year-old female presenting to a local rural emergency room with abdominal pain and known abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 5.5 cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, significantly greater in size compared to previous imaging, as well as a distended gallbladder with mild wall thickening and cholelithiasis concerning for acute cholecystitis. The two conditions were found to be unrelated to each other, but concerns were raised on appropriate timing of care. Following diagnosis, the patient underwent concomitant treatment of acute cholecystitis and large abdominal aortic aneurysm with laparoscopic and endovascular techniques, respectively. In this report, we take the opportunity to discuss the treatment of patients with AAA and concomitant symptomatic acute cholecystitis.

Outcomes of Surgery for Endograft Infection in the Abdominal Aorta and Iliac Artery: A Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and prognostic factors in patients with endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery is a potentially fatal condition. However, due to its rarity, clinical characteristics and optimal treatment strategy remain to be established.

METHODS

In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we investigated 112 patients who underwent surgical treatment for endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and/or iliac artery between 2011 and 2017 using a Japanese clinical registry. We examined the relationships between the preoperative and operative factors and the outcomes after surgery including persistent or recurrent infection related to the endograft and 90-day and 3-year mortality.

RESULTS

The median period between the index endograft placement and surgery for infection was 369.5 days. Persistent or recurrent endograft-related infection occurred in 34 patients (30.4%). The cumulative overall survival rates at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 90.2%, 76.5%, 66.7%, 50.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. Partial removal or total preservation of the infected endograft was independently associated with short-term and late mortality. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of fistula development to the gastrointestinal tract also showed an independent association with late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention for endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery was associated with a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Total removal of the infected endograft should be attempted because partial removal or total preservation can lead to a poor prognosis.

Self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts for the treatment of abdominal aortic infections

OBJECTIVES

Aortic infections are an uncommon but life-threatening disease. The material of choice for aortic reconstruction is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to examine the short and mid-term outcomes in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections using self-made bovine pericardium tube grafts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study collected all patients who underwent in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction using self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts between February 2020 and December 2021 in a tertiary care center. Patient comorbidities, symptoms, radiological, bacteriological and peri-operative findings, as well as postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Bovine pericardial aortic tube grafts were used in 11 patients (10 male, median age 68.7 years). Two patients presented a native aortic infection and nine had graft infections (four bypass grafts, four endografts and a plurioperated patient who had undergone both endovascular and open procedures). There were two emergent surgeries due to infectious aneurysm ruptures. All patients were symptomatic and the most frequent clinical finding was lumbar or abdominal pain (36%), followed by wound infection (27%) and fever (18%). Seven bifurcated and four straight pericardial tube grafts were needed. Purulent drainage was obtained around the previous graft or in the aneurysmal sac in 7 cases; intraoperative cultures were positive in 6 cases (Gram + bacteria). Two patients died in the immediate postoperative period (perioperative mortality 18%; urgent procedures 50%; scheduled procedures 11%). One patient had a major complication due to bilateral SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. There was one single reintervention to control hemostasis due to bleeding non-graft-related. The median follow-up was 14.1 months (3-24 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience in the treatment of abdominal aortic infections by in situ reconstrucción with self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts shows promising results. These should be confirmed in the long term.

Abdominal aortic endograft infection. A decade of experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Aortic endograft infection is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). There is no consensus on management of endograft infection and little evidence has been published in our country. Endograft explantation is considered the "gold standar" treatment whereas percutaneous or surgical perigraft and sac drainage associated to antibiotics should be considered and alternative therapy.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective and descriptive review of abdominal aortic endograft infections at our tertiary center (Hospital Universitario Cruces) during last ten years (2010-2019).

RESULTS

We describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of 10 EVAR infections, their management and outcomes. The incidence of graft infection after EVAR was 3%. The mean time to the clinical presentation of infection was 16.9 months (median 4.5 months). The microbiological diagnosis was reached in 100% of cases (predominance of gram-positive species). The overall mortality rate was 50% (although the survival rate was 100% after surgical drainage of the sac).

CONCLUSION

Perigraft or aneurysm sac aspiration culture show their diagnostic utility as microbiological diagnosis was reached in all cases despite of blood cultures being only positive in 50% of the samples. Surgical drainage and endograft preservation combined with antibiotherapy show remarkable results. The high heterogeneity in our case series makes difficult to offer general recommendations, thus far, a tailored approach to treatment is suggested.

Outcomes of Candida and Non-Candida Aortic Graft Infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of Candida- and non-Candida-associated aortic graft infections.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients treated for aortic graft infection from 2015 to 2021 in our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients (56 men; median age, 69 years; range, 50-87 years) were admitted with aortic graft infection, including 21 (32%) patients in the Candida group and 45 (68%) in the non-Candida group. The average time between initial operation and presentation of aortic graft infection was 50 months (range, 1-332 months). Graft-enteric fistulas (GEFs) were more often in the Candida group (57% vs 27%, P = .017). The most proven causative fungal specimen was C. albicans in 16 (76%) patients. Non-albicans Candida was found in 9% of all patients and 29% of the Candida patients. The median ICU length of stay was longer in the Candida group than non-Candida (10 vs 9 days, P = .012). Additionally, the median hospital length of stay was longer in the Candida group (33 vs 22 days, P = .048). There were no statistically significant differences between Candida and non-Candida groups according to the in-hospital mortality (24% vs 24%, P = .955), and 1-year mortality (38% vs 38%, P = .980).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bacterial and fungal aortic graft infections have high rates of morbidity and mortality. We found no significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between Candida and non-Candida patients. However, the ICU and hospital length of stay were longer in the Candida group.

Referral Centre Experience with Infected Abdominal Aortic Endograft Explantation

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) appears to be associated with the burden of vascular endograft infections. Complete stent graft explantation is recommended but leads to significant mortality. This study aimed to assess the technical challenges, complications, and mortality rate following infected endograft explantation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent abdominal aortic endograft explantation for infection at the Bordeaux University Hospital from July 2008 to December 2020 were included retrospectively in this single centre observational study. The diagnosis was established based on the MAGIC criteria. The primary endpoint was 30 day mortality. Secondary endpoints were 90 day and in hospital mortality, survival, and re-infection.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included, median age 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65, 76), with four (12%) treated as an emergency. The median time from EVAR to explantation was 17.5 months (4.5 - 36.3). In situ reconstruction was carried out with prosthetic grafts in 24 patients (71%, including 23 antimicrobial grafts combining silver and triclosan), and biological grafts in 10 (five femoral veins, four arterial allografts, three bovine patches, one biosynthetic graft). Seventeen aorto-enteric fistulae (AEnF) were addressed with direct repair of the intestinal tract (n = 10/17; 59%) or resection and anastomosis (n = 7/17; 41%). The culture was polymicrobial in 12 patients (35%) and remained sterile in four (12%). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rates were 21% (n = 7) and 27% (n = 9). Twenty-five patients (73%) presented with early post-operative complications, requiring 16 revision procedures (47%). Over a median follow up of 16.2 months (IQR 8.3, 33.6), the mortality rate was 35% (n = 12; 11 aortic related; 32%), with two re-infections (6%), both after biological reconstruction (one for an AEnF).

CONCLUSION

Early morbidity and mortality remain high after complete infected endograft explantation, even in a high volume centre. Comparison with other treatment modalities in large multicentre cohorts might be of interest.

Explant of the Aortic Endograft: Today's Solutions, Tomorrow's Problems

Type 2 endoleaks remain the Achilles heel of abdominal aortic endografting. They drive imaging costs and repeat intervention. We believe that after two endovascular interventions, patients should be considered for either graft explantation or graft salvage through an open abdominal exploration. Graft explantation has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality but remains necessary in the face of non-correctible type 1a endoleaks, graft failure, or graft infection. In the majority of cases AAA expansion due to persistent type 2 endoleak is the culprit. In this situation, open repair, with oversewing of the lumbar or inferior mesenteric arteries, can be accomplished providing the seal zones and component overall zones are adequate. This approach does not require aortic clamping. We provide detailed descriptions and videos to facilitate the surgeon in performing these complex procedures.

Thoracic aortic vascular graft infection: outcome after conservative treatment without graft removal

OBJECTIVES

Surgical debridement with aortic graft removal is considered the preferred treatment for thoracic aortic vascular graft infection (VGI). Conservative treatment with antibiotics only is usually reserved for inoperable patients. Due to Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) and better understanding of the antibiotic impact on biofilms, long-term targeted antibiotic therapy without graft removal may be an alternative treatment option for selected thoracic aortic VGI patients. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the outcome in patients with thoracic aortic VGI who were treated without graft removal.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with a thoracic aortic VGI diagnosed between 2008 and 2021 and who were treated without graft removal. The primary outcome parameter was the 6-month mortality rate after VGI diagnosis. Secondary outcome parameters were cure rates and relapse of infection.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with thoracic aortic VGI who were managed without graft removal were identified. The mortality rate 6 months after VGI diagnosis was 8% (2/24); one of these deaths was infection related. The median antibiotic treatment duration was 13 months (interquartile range 15). A total of 16 patients (67%) were cured. No relapses occurred after a median of 24-month (interquartile range 32) follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive antibiotic treatment, without graft removal, may be a non-inferior option in patients with a thoracic aortic VGI who are not considered for surgery.

Thoracic aorta graft infection by avibactam-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae treated with meropenem/vaborbactam: a case report and literature review

Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) is a new carbapenem-carbapenemase inhibitor combination drug active against extensively drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Studies about its efficacy and place in therapy are limited in "real-life" and no data are available for deep site infections, like vascular graft infections. We present a case of a patient successfully treated with M/V for a thoracic aorta graft infection, placed for a traumatic penetrating aortic ulcer, due to an extensively KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to ceftazidime/ avibactam. Furthermore, we conducted a systematic literature review concerning vascular graft infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and the papers published until now about the use of M/V for the treatment of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae. Meropenem/vaborbactam is a promising antibiotic for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options. Only few reports have been published and more studies are needed to assess which is the best place in therapy of M/V.

Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option?

Purpose

Non-operative management of aortic graft infection is usually only considered in a palliative context. We describe the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of aortic graft infections (AGI) following either open or endovascular repair of aneurysmal disease.

Methods

Twelve consecutive patients (11 males, 1 female, mean age 72.7 ± 10.3 years, age range 52-88 years) between January 2010-July 2020 who underwent percutaneous drain insertion in either an infected aortic sac or periaortic abscess cavity following endovascular or open surgical graft repair were identified. Patient and procedural characteristics as well as clinical outcomes were determined.

Results

Of the 12 patients who underwent percutaneous drain insertion, five (41.7%) had undergone open abdominal aneurysm repair, one (8.3%) open thoracoabdominal aneurysmal repair, and six (50%) endovascular abdominal aneurysm repairs. Drain size ranged from 10-20 French. All were inserted under ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or fluoroscopic guidance. Median duration of drain placement was 55.2 days (range 3-174). Five patients (41.7%) had the drain in place as a stabilizing bridge until or after definitive surgical explantation and aortic reconstruction. Seven patients (58.3%) were managed with drain placement and antibiotic therapy without surgical intervention. Six (50%) were alive at the most recent time of follow-up (median, 732 days, range 166-1650 days). Three patients (25%) died during follow-up with causes including erosion of aortic reconstruction into sigmoid colon, unrelated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, and severe clostridium difficile colitis and pseudomonal pneumonia (median 1244 days, range 992-1597 days). Three (25%) patients were lost to follow-up. No drain-related complications were noted.

Conclusion

Percutaneous drainage of AGI following endovascular or open aneurysm repair is a safe and viable management option either as a temporizing measure as a bridge to surgical graft explantation or as a non-surgical therapy for long term management.

Aortic graft explants - A single institution analysis of incidence and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Explantation of both endovascular endovascular aneurysm repair and open aortic grafts is a procedure associated with high peri-operative risk, and the current study sought to determine the outcomes and trends over time in these patients.

METHODS

This study examined data from all patients undergoing explant of an aortic graft (both open and endovascular) between January 2004 and December 2020 at a single centre. Variables analysed included comorbidities, duration to and indication for explantation, type of revascularization, in-hospital complications and mortality, duration of hospital and ICU stay, and out-patient mortality.

RESULTS

Of 688 open and 1352 EVARs performed, 46 patients underwent 48 explants. Five were open grafts and 43 were endografts, equating to an explant rate of 0.73% of open and 3.18% EVARs. Average time to explant was 70 months, with patients presenting electively having a significantly longer duration to representation than those presenting emergently (51 vs 44 months, p=0.003). Indication for explant was endoleak in 70%, infection in 23%, and occlusion in 6%. Of the endoleaks, 61% of were Type 1, 22% Type II, 11% Type IV, and 6% Type V. On representation, 17 patients (35%) were symptomatic. Overall mortality rate was 8.3%, with a trend for higher mortality in emergent than elective presentations (11.8 vs 6.5%, p=0.55). There was no change in explant rate over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective aortic graft explantation is associated with low mortality, despite its complexity and patient comorbidities. Patients presenting with symptoms suffered higher mortality and a longer post-operative course, suggesting that aortic graft explantation should be considered sooner rather than later, rather than persisting with repeated endovascular management.

In situ Reconstruction with Autologous Veins for the Treatment of Infected Abdominal Endografts: Single Center Experience

Background: Vascular graft infection is a feared complication with high mortality and morbidity rates. Complete excision with in situ repair is recommended. We report our experience with patients suffering of abdominal aortic endograft infection undergoing excision and in situ reconstruction with autologous vein. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent excision of an abdominal aortic endograft and in situ reconstruction with autologous superficial femoral veins between April 2005 and June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcome measures were mortality and reinfection. Secondary outcome measure was patient morbidity. Results: Fifteen patients (14 male; 93%) were included. Twenty percent of the index procedures (N = 3) were performed at our hospital, 80% (N = 12) were referred patients. Three aorto-enteric fistulae were seen. Staphylococci and enterococci were the most common pathogens (N = 8; 53%). In two out of six patients (33%) with an endograft with suprarenal fixation, the suprarenal fixation stent was left in situ. 30-day mortality rate was 6.6% (N = 1). Median follow-up time was 12 months (range 0-85). During follow-up, no reinfection was seen. Serious morbidity was witnessed in 2 patients (sepsis due to bowel leakage (N = 1), pneumonia (N = 2), hemodialysis (N = 1)). Eventration was the most common late morbidity observed (N = 5). Conclusions: Surgical treatment of vascular abdominal endograft infection by in situ reconstruction with autologous deep vein is a challenging procedure. If a multidisciplinary approach is applied and patients are centralized in experienced centers, acceptable mortality and morbidity rates can be achieved.

[18F] FDG PET/CT can improve the diagnostic accuracy for aortic endograft infection

PURPOSE

Aortic endograft infection (EI) can result in potentially life-threatening vascular complications. Unfortunately, it is difficult to obtain a correct diagnosis at an early stage in many patients. This report aims at validating the use of [¹⁸F] FDG PET/CT imaging for suspected endograft infections in a prospectively collected cohort of patients treated with EVAR and TEVAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 14-year period, 366 patients required aortic stent graft. All procedures were performed electively, except for one patient. Among these 366 patients, eleven patients (3%) were suspected to have aortic EI. Contrast-enhanced CT and FDG PET/CT were performed in all 11 patients. Medical charts and imaging were analysed for these 11 cases, with initial positive CT.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis of EI was established in seven (1,9%) based on clinical features, laboratory investigations and a significant [¹⁸F] FDG uptake in the aortic graft as well as the aortic wall. The median time from the initial EVAR/TEVAR to diagnosed infection was 180 days. During follow-up, the seven patients had a second PET/CT that was compared with the initial evaluation, decreased uptake was correlated with clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary diagnostic imaging for a potentially lethal endograft infection lacks precision, this observational study illustrates the potential clinical value of [¹⁸F] FDG PET/CT in the management of aortic EI. [¹⁸F] FDG PET/CT constitutes an imaging modality able to confirm the diagnosis, monitor disease progression as well as the effect of pharmaceutical treatment and detect relapse.

Dependent functional status rather than age is a better predictor of adverse outcomes after excision of an infected abdominal aortic graft

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of infected abdominal aortic grafts is complete surgical excision plus in situ or extra-anatomic revascularization in patients who can tolerate this morbid operation. In addition to using age and the presence of comorbidities for risk assessment, physicians form a global clinical impression when deciding whether to offer excision or to manage conservatively. Functional status is a distinct objective measure that can inform this decision. This study examines the relative impact of age and functional status on outcomes of infected abdominal aortic graft excision to guide surgical decision-making.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology code 35907 was used to identify patients undergoing excision of infected abdominal aortic graft in the 2005 to 2017 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by the upper age quartile (75 years old) as a cutoff, and then by functional status, independent vs dependent (as defined by NSIQIP). The patients were then stratified into four groups: Younger (<75)/Independent, Younger (<75)/Dependent, Older (≥75)/Independent, and Older (≥75)/Dependent. Outcomes measured included 30-day mortality and major organ-system dysfunction.

RESULTS

There were 814 patients who underwent infected abdominal aortic graft excision: 508 patients (62%) were Younger/Independent, 89 patients (11%) were Younger/Dependent, 176 patients (22%) were Older/Independent, and 41 patients (5%) were Older/Dependent. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality for Younger/Dependent (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-3.09; P = .536) or Older/Independent (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.19; P = .311) patients when compared with Younger/Independent patients, which suggests that neither old age nor dependent functional status by itself adversely affects mortality. However, when both factors were present, Older/Dependent patients had three times higher mortality when compared with Younger/Independent patients (41.5% vs 13.4%, respectively; OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.46-6.71; P = .003). Furthermore, as long as patients presented with independent functional status, old age by itself did not adversely affect major organ-system dysfunction (ORs for Older/Independent vs Younger/Independent were 0.76 [P = .454], 1.04 [P = .874], and 0.90 [P = .692] for cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications, respectively). On the contrary, even in younger patients, dependent functional status was significantly associated with higher pulmonary complications (Younger/Dependent vs Younger/Independent: OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.33-3.73; P = .002) and higher rates of unplanned reoperation (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.62-4.41; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dependent functional status has significant association with adverse outcomes after excision of infected abdominal aortic grafts, whereas old age alone does not. Therefore, this procedure could be considered in appropriately selected elderly patients with otherwise good functional status. However, caution should be applied in dependent patients regardless of age due to the risk of pulmonary complications.

External iliac artery pseudoaneurysm following treatment for arterio-ureteral fistula using a balloon-expandable stent-graft: A case report

Sepsis and bleeding can lead to life-threatening complications, such as stent-graft infection and pseudoaneurysm, after stent-graft implantation. An 83 year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for sepsis 14 months after treatment with a balloon-expandable stent-graft for an arterio-ureteral fistula (AUF) between the right external iliac artery and the right ureter. Blood cultures were positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Candida tropicalis. A giant infectious pseudoaneurysm (44 × 70 mm) at the distal edge of the stent-graft was suspected of having caused the sepsis. Although endovascular therapy (EVT) was planned to correct the pseudoaneurysm, the right iliac artery spontaneously became occluded from the ostium of the right common iliac artery to the common femoral artery 5 days after diagnosing the pseudoaneurysm; hence, EVT was not performed. Antibiotic administration was continued, and blood culture results were negative. Although EVT using a stent graft for AUFs is effective, data on the chronic phase outcomes are limited. Therefore, patients with AUFs treated using stent-grafts should be carefully followed up.

Endoleak Complicated by communicating psoas abscess and aorto-enteric fistula in an immunocompromised patient

PURPOSE

While endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), it is not without its disadvantages. Feared complications include graft infections, fistulation and endoleak, the outcomes of which may be life limiting.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of a 57 year-old patient with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) previously treated with EVAR for AAA complicated by endoleak post treatment. He developed an aorto-psoas abscess 2 years later which harboured Mycobacterium avium complex, and medical therapy was unsuccessful. He eventually underwent an extra-anatomical bypass and graft explant, for which an aortoenteric fistula was also discovered and repaired.

CONCLUSION

Infection of endografts post EVAR is relatively rare, and there are presently no guidelines concerning its management. The concomittance of aorto-psoas abscess and aortoenteric fistula is even more uncommon, and necessitated surgical explant for source control purposes in our patient. Lifelong surveillance is required for complications of the aortic stump and bypass patency.

Abdominal aortic endograft infection. A decade of experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Aortic endograft infection is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). There is no consensus on management of endograft infection and little evidence has been published in our country. Endograft explantation is considered the "gold standard" treatment whereas percutaneous or surgical perigraft and sac drainage associated to antibiotics should be considered and alternative therapy.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective and descriptive review of abdominal aortic endograft infections at our tertiary center (Hospital Universitario Cruces) during last ten years (2010-2019).

RESULTS

We describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of 10 EVAR infections, their management and outcomes. The incidence of graft infection after EVAR was 3%. The mean time to the clinical presentation of infection was 16.9 months (median 4.5 months). The microbiological diagnosis was reached in 100% of cases (predominance of gram-positive species). The overall mortality rate was 50% (although the survival rate was 100% after surgical drainage of the sac).

CONCLUSIONS

Perigraft or aneurysm sac aspiration culture shows their diagnostic utility as microbiological diagnosis was reached in all cases despite of blood cultures being only positive in 50% of the samples. Surgical drainage and endograft preservation combined with antibiotherapy show remarkable results. The high heterogeneity in our case series makes difficult to offer general recommendations, thus far, a tailored approach to treatment is suggested.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for aortic vascular graft infection; a five-year retrospective evaluation

OBJECTIVES

An estimated 1% of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices become infected, carrying a high mortality rate. Surgical explantation is recommended and prognosis is guarded. This retrospective cohort analysis focuses on the role of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in the management of aortic vascular graft infections following EVAR.

METHODS

Patients who received OPAT for aortic graft infections (AGI) following EVAR from 2014 to 2018 inclusive were identified using the OPAT database. Clinical, microbiological and radiological data were collected. Survivors were followed up for a median of 36 months (range 25-60) after first presentation with infection. Outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven cases with 20 OPAT episodes were identified: 10/11 male, median age 76 (IQR 71-81). Median time to presentation was 7 months (range 0-81 months) after EVAR. OPAT lead to a 55% reduction in length of hospital stay. One patient had graft explantation; four others had temporising measures. Eight of 11 were alive a median of 36 months after presentation with infection, having had a median of 2 re-treatments on OPAT (range 1-3). Seven of the eight survivors were on continuous suppressive oral antimicrobials; three were also intermittently on intravenous antibiotics for flares of infection. Patient/ infection outcomes were cure (1/11), improved (7/11), failure (3/11).

CONCLUSION

AGI following EVAR usually presents in the first year after graft deployment. OPAT has an important peri-operative role in patients suitable for curative surgery. OPAT followed by oral suppressive antimicrobial therapy can be a feasible long-term treatment for non-curative management of AGI. Survival in our cohort was longer than expected, and OPAT was feasible despite the complexity of these infections. OPAT can avoid multiple and lengthy hospital admissions and maximise time at home and quality of life in this cohort with life-limiting infection.

Aortobifemoral Bypass Grafting with Reversed L-Shaped Technique for Endograft Infection

Endograft infection after abdominal endovascular aortic repair is a rare but catastrophic complication associated with high perioperative mortality and postoperative recurrent infection. The optimal surgical treatment is still controversial, particularly regarding in situ or extra-anatomical revascularization. Herein, we describe a successful surgically treated case of a patient with an endograft infection complicated with abscess formation in the retroperitoneal space around the right common iliac artery. We performed an aortobifemoral bypass grafting using the reversed L-shaped technique by rerouting the right leg of the new prosthesis to avoid the infected area. The patient is doing well 1 year after surgery without recurrent infection. This technique was considered to be advantageous because revascularization could be performed remotely from the infected area.

Surgical Explantation of a Fenestrated Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Device Complicated by Aorto-Enteric Fistula

Introduction

Alarming outcomes have been reported following infected endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) device explantation. Infected fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) exposes patients to even worse procedural risks.

Report

A 67 year old man with a prior history of FEVAR presented with impaired general condition, abdominal and back pain, and increased C reactive protein. Computed tomography angiography revealed a collection around the aortic graft bifurcation and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed increased FDG uptake at this level, confirmed by labelled white blood cells, all favouring graft infection. A thoracophrenolumbotomy was performed and revealed an aorto-enteric fistula which was treated by small bowel resection. The left renal artery was transected at the distal end of the bridging stent and a thoracorenal bypass was performed. The thoracic aorta was cross clamped above the coeliac trunk for complete graft excision. Meanwhile, the right kidney was perfused with 4°C Ringer lactate solution. In situ reconstruction was accomplished with a bifurcated antimicrobial graft sutured below the superior mesenteric artery with re-implantation of the right renal artery. The patient was left with a laparostomy for definitive abdominal closure, restoration of the digestive tract, and omental wrap 72 hours later. Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy was initiated peri-operatively and reduced to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim for a total duration of six weeks after one sample was positive for Moraxella osloensis. Eleven months later, the patient was free from re-infection, with no fever or inflammatory syndrome.

Discussion

Total explantation of stent grafts with tissue debridement and post-operative antibiotic therapy is the gold standard when dealing with infected EVAR. As with type IV thoraco-abdominal aneurysm open repair, FEVAR device explantation requires additional protective measures to prevent visceral ischaemia and renal impairment. In agreement with the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, such patients should be referred to dedicated vascular centres with expertise in surgical repair, anaesthetics, and post-operative intensive care.

•

Alarming outcomes have been reported following infected endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) explantation.

•

Total explantation of stent grafts with tissue debridement and post-operative antibiotic therapy is the gold standard.

•

FEVAR explantation requires additional protective measures to prevent visceral ischaemia and kidney impairment.

Novel prefabricated bovine pericardial grafts as alternate conduit for septic aortoiliac reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Infection of prosthetic aortic grafts represents a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. Replacement with autologous material is recommended; however, in its absence, biological material should be favored. In the present retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the short- and midterm results with the use of commercially available prefabricated bovine pericardium grafts (BPGs) used for the management of aortic graft infection or aortic reconstructive surgery in the presence of systemic infection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients in whom BPGs had been used for aortic reconstruction at two vascular centers. Prefabricated vascular pericardium grafts were preferred over other biological reconstruction techniques for selected cases. Comorbidities, procedure-related details, perioperative morbidity, clinical outcomes, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2019, 21 patients had received BPGs at two Austrian vascular centers. Their median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 55-71 years), the patients were predominantly male (76%), and the median body mass index was 25.3 kg/m² (IQR, 21.7-27.3 kg/m²). The major comorbidities included arterial hypertension, peripheral artery disease, smoking, and chronic pulmonary disease. The indications for surgery were vascular graft or endograft infection in 62% and aortic reconstruction in the presence of systemic infection in 38%. Three patients (14%) had aortoenteric fistulas. Surgery was technically successful in all cases. The median follow-up was 21.6 months (IQR, 6.0-34.6 months). The 30-day mortality was 9.5%. The 1- and 2-year overall survival was 84% and 75%, respectively. Of the 21 patients, 89% had remained free of recurrent infection. One of the two reinfections had resolved after treatment of the underlying focus. At 2 years, the primary and assisted primary patency rates were 86% and 94%, respectively. No limbs were lost during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Prefabricated BPGs represent a promising alternative for the management of aortic graft infections and aortoiliac reconstruction in the presence of systemic infection.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in management of aorto-oesophageal fistulas: a case series

Background 

Aorto-oesophageal fistula (AOF) is a rare, catastrophic disease with an extremely poor prognosis. A ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm is a common aetiology for AOF. The clinical presentation is usually massive haematemesis and collapse. Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial in managing AOF.

Case summary 

We hereby report two cases of AOF, who underwent successful emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to control active bleed and exsanguination. Case 1, an elderly lady with atherosclerotic aneurysm had TEVAR followed by open surgery for oesophageal rent and necrosed left main bronchus. Case 2 had mycotic tubercular aneurysm who later had infected graft-stent following TEVAR.

Discussion 

Open surgery is the conventional treatment for AOF; however, TEVAR can be an alternative and less invasive approach in selected high-risk patients. Various management issues related to TEVAR with AOF have been discussed in the article.

Hybrid Repair Combined with Fresh Arterial Allograft Extra-Anatomical Reconstruction: The Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aneurysm above an Aortobifemoral Bypass Complicated by an Infected Pseudoaneurysm in the Left Groin

Introduction

A 72-year-old male patient was admitted into our centre with large infected pseudoaneurysm (PSA) in the left groin. The patient underwent a CT angiography (CTA) that confirmed a large partly thrombosed 6.5 × 5.5 cm PSA in the left groin arising from the distal anastomosis of the aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). Furthermore, the CTA revealed 11 cm juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) from which the proximal anastomosis of the ABF was arising.

Method

Aorto-uni-iliac stent graft Cook was placed from the right groin trough native severely stenotic right iliac arteries with proximal landing zone below the renal arteries, excluding the JAAA and the ABF. The distal landing zone was in the common iliac artery maintaining patent right internal iliac artery. Afterwards, a femoro-femoral crossover bypass from right to left was performed using a fresh arterial allograft. Postprocedurally, the hospital stay was uneventful. The left groin PSA cultures came positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis and Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum, both sensitive to vancomycin and rifampicin.

Result

The patient underwent intravenous ATB treatment with vancomycin for two weeks, followed by four weeks of oral rifampicin. The patient was discharged on the 20^th postoperative days.

Conclusion

Hybrid repair combining aortic stent graft and extra-anatomical bypass in the treatment of infected distal parts of an aortofemoral bypass is an acceptable treatment modality.

A complicated course for an infected endovascular stent graft

The management of an infected endovascular aortic stent graft can be complex and morbid. Therefore, caution should be exercised before an endovascular approach is considered in patients presenting with a saccular aneurysm who are younger than 65 years and without risk factors for this may indicate a mycotic aneurysm. An open approach with consideration of aneurysm excision should be entertained to prevent an endovascular implantation in the setting of an infected aorta. We report a case of endovascular aortic stent graft infection that led to complex surgical management and prolonged postoperative care.

Surgical and medical interventions for abdominal aortic graft infections

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic graft infections are a major complication following abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, with high morbidity and mortality rates. They can be treated surgically or conservatively using medical management. The two most common surgical techniques are in situ replacement of the graft and extra-anatomical bypass. Medical management most commonly consists of a course of long-term antibiotics. There is currently no consensus on which intervention (extra-anatomical bypass, in situ replacement, or medical) is the most effective in managing abdominal aortic graft infections. Whilst in emergency or complex situations such as graft rupture surgical management is the only option, in non-emergency situations it is often personal preference that influences the clinician's decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the effects of surgical and medical interventions for abdominal aortic graft infections.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 December 2019. We also reviewed the bibliographies of the studies identified by the search and contacted specialists in the field and study authors to request information on any possible unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We aimed to include all randomised controlled trials that used surgical or medical interventions to treat abdominal aortic graft infections. The definitions of abdominal aortic graft infections were accepted as presented in the individual studies, and included secondary infection due to aortoenteric fistula. We excluded studies presenting data on prosthetic graft infections in general, unless data specific to abdominal aortic graft infections could be isolated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed all studies identified by the search. We planned to independently assess risk of bias of the included trials and to evaluate the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our main outcomes were overall mortality, amputation, graft re-infection, overall graft-related complications, graft-related mortality, acute limb ischaemia, and re-intervention.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no randomised controlled trials to conduct meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to draw conclusions to support any treatment over the other. Multicentre clinical trials are required to compare different treatments for the condition.

Perigraft abscess after DeBakey type-1 aortic dissection: a case report

Background

Perigraft abscess is a rare condition which constitutes a small proportion of aortic graft infection (AGI). Early diagnosis is very important for timely intervention and improving the survival rate of patients because of its significant morbidity and mortality.

Case presentation

A 24-year-old young male patient with a history of complicated total arch replacement using elephant trunk technique for acute DeBakey type-1 aortic dissection 6 months before visited our hospital with the chief complaint of persistent fever. Antibiotic treatment in local hospital was ineffective. Echocardiography showed liquid dark area around the aortic graft, and a computerized tomography angiography (CTA) was done for further evaluation of periaortic fluid collection which showed findings to suggest perigraft abscess. The patient underwent surgical debridement of the abscess and was found to have an abscess around the aortic graft which was drained followed by antibiotic treatment. The patient was discharged to his local hospital and recovered well at 2 month follow-up appointment.

Conclusion

This is a very rare case of aortic abscess around the graft that could successfully be managed by graft-conserving surgery, and it emphasizes the significance of early diagnosis of perigraft abscess in patients with aortic dissection surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta: Analysis of Aortic Graft Infections following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Introduction. Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare complication following AAA repair and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management is variable, and there are no evidence-based guidelines. The aim of this study was to systematically review and analyse management options for AGI.

Recommendations for management of infected aortic pathology based on current evidence

The management of infection involving the abdominal aorta requires clinical decisions based on patient factors and the nature of the infectious process. Any infection occurring after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair or open aortic replacement grafting should be treated promptly with appropriate systemic antibiotic therapy. Once a vascular prosthesis becomes infected, surgical treatment is necessary. There should be a low threshold for graft excision and extra-anatomic bypass in the presence of fistula or abscess cavity, when feasible entire graft should be excised. In selected patients, graft excision with in situ aorta reconstruction is an appropriate option using an autogenous femoral vein, cryopreserved allograft, or a prosthetic graft impregnated with antibiotic. The replaced in situ aortic graft should be covered with an omental pedicle. For primary aortic graft infections, endovascular treatment may act as a bridge to more definitive treatment; or, in the absence of gross retroperitoneal infections, endovascular grafting alone with prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy is a viable option, particularly in patients not fit for open surgical procedures.

Aortic graft infection with enteric organism after embolization of late type II endoleak

An 82-year-old man with a history of endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm 6 years ago presented with a type II endoleak and enlarging sac. He had successful transabdominal direct sac puncture embolization but developed fever 2 days postoperatively. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a rim-enhancing collection, and sac aspiration was positive for enteric organisms, confirming endograft infection. The patient underwent graft explantation and neoaortic reconstruction using superficial femoral veins. Three months postoperatively, computed tomography showed complete resolution of fluid collection and no signs of graft infection. This report illustrates direct puncture embolization complicated by endograft infection from enteric bacteria.

A systematic review of infected descending thoracic aortic grafts and endografts

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to collect and critically analyze the current evidence on the modalities and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic surgical graft (SG) and endograft (EG) infection, which represents a rare but dramatic complication after both surgical and endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic health database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library) identified all articles that were published up to October 2017 reporting on thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Observational studies, multicenter reports, single-center series and case reports, case-control studies, and guidelines were considered eligible if reporting specific results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Comparisons of patients presenting with SG or EG infection and between invasive and conservative treatment were performed. Odds ratio (OR) meta-analyses were run when comparative data were available.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies reporting on 233 patients with infected SG (49) or EG (184) were included. Four were multicenter studies including 107 patients, all with EG infection, associated with a fistula in 91% of cases, with a reported overall survival at 2 years of 16% to 39%. The remaining 39 single-center studies included 49 patients with SG infection and 77 with EG infection. Association with aortoesophageal fistula was significantly more common with EG (60% vs 31%; P = .01). In addition, time interval from index procedure to infection was significantly shorter with EG (17 ± 21 months vs 32 ± 61 months; P = .03). Meta-analysis showed a trend of increased 1-year mortality in patients with SG infection compared with EG infection (pooled OR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-14.7; P = .073). Surgical management with infected graft explantation was associated with a trend toward lower 1-year mortality compared with graft preservation (pooled OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0; P = .056).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic EG infection is likely to occur more frequently in association with aortoesophageal fistulas and in a shorter time compared with SG infection. Survival is poor in both groups, especially in patients with SG infection. Surgical treatment with graft explantation seems to be the preferable choice in fit patients.

Vascular Graft Infections: An update

Vascular graft infection is a devastating complication of vascular reconstructive surgery. The infection can occur early in the postoperative period and is largely due to intraoperative contamination or by contiguous extension from a nearby infection. It can also occur years after implantation. Staphylococci remain the most common organisms and biofilm production makes eradication difficult. Factors commonly reported to predispose to vascular graft infection are periodontal disease, nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus, bacteremia, certain graft characteristics, diabetes mellitus, postoperative hyperglycemia, location of the incision, wound infection, and emergency procedure. Management consists of antibiotic and surgical therapy. Preventive methods are described.

Current Evidence on Management of Aortic Stent-graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aortic stent-graft infection (SGI) is rare but remains one of the most challenging and threatening complications. This systematic review aimed to identify the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of endograft infection after abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

A systematic literature review of all published literature from January 1991 to September 2016 on SGI was performed under the instruction of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Aorta, aneurysm, endovascular, stent-graft, endograft and infection were the keywords used in our comprehensive search in PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, V 22.0.

RESULTS

A total of 185 potential relevant articles were identified, but only 11 studies with 402 patients met the inclusion criteria. Majority of the patients were male (308/402, 77%), with a mean age ranging from 65 to 73 years. Most of the endografts were implanted for EVAR (351/402, 87%), while the other 51 (13%) endografts were infected following TEVAR. Among the 402 patients, 39 (9.7%) patients presented with aortic rupture. Ninety-two of 380 (24.2%) patients with available data had aortoenteric fistula (AEF). Sixty-nine patients (17%) died in hospital or within 30 days after operation. One hundred fourteen patients (28%) died during follow-up. The most commonly used stent grafts were Zenith (Cook Inc, Bloomington, IN) (22%) and Excluder (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) (20%). Of the 402 patients in this series, 108 patients (27%) had negative culture, and multiple microorganisms were identified in 103 patients (26%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Staphylcoccus species (30.1%), Streptococcus (14.8%), and fungus (9.2%). Forty-two patients (42/401, 10%) received conservative treatment, whereas 359 (90%) patients underwent surgical treatment, including stent graft removal with in situ reconstruction or extra-anatomical bypass, and secondary endovascular procedure. Patients in the surgical group had a higher survival rate compared with conservative group (58% vs. 33%, P = 0.002). The survival rate was higher in the patients with infected EVAR than TEVAR (58% vs. 27%, P = 0.000). Patient with AEF had a worse prognosis (survival rate 72% vs. 33%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that surgical treatment is a better option compared with conservative management in selected patients with aortic endograft infection. The outcome was worse in patients with infected TEVAR and AEF.