Differential FDG-PET Uptake Patterns in Uninfected and Infected Central Prosthetic Vascular Grafts

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Performance of the BioIntegral Bovine Pericardial Graft in Vascular Infections: VASCular No-REact Graft Against INfection Study

BACKGROUND

Vascular graft and endograft infections (VGEI) and native vessel infections (NVI) remain considerable challenges in vascular surgery, leading to high mortality and morbidity rates. Although in situ reconstruction is the preferred treatment, the material of choice is still a source of debate. Autologous veins are considered the first choice; however, xenografts may be an acceptable alternative. The performance of a biomodified bovine pericardial graft is assessed when implemented in an infected vascular area.

METHODS

This is a prospective multicenter cohort study. Patients who underwent reconstruction for VGEI or NVI with a biomodified bovine pericardial bifurcated or straight tube graft were included from December 2017 until June 2021. The primary outcome measure was reinfection at mid-term follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included mortality, patency, and amputation rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with vascular infections were included, of which 23 (68%) had an infected Dacron prosthesis after primary open repair and 8 (24%) had an infected endovascular graft. The remaining 3 (9%) had infected native vessels. At secondary repair, 3 (7%) patients had an in situ aortic tube reconstruction, 29 (66%) had an aortic bifurcated reconstruction, and 2 (5%) had an iliac-femoral reconstruction. At 1-year follow-up after the BioIntegral bovine pericardial graft reconstruction, the reinfection rate was 9%. The 1-year infection-related and procedure-related mortality rate was 16%. The occlusion rate was 6% and in total 3 patients underwent a lower limb amputation during the 1-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In situ reconstruction as treatment of (endo)graft and native vessel infections remains a challenge and reinfection looms as a potential consequence. In cases where time is of essence or when autologous venous repair is not feasible, a swift available solution is needed. The BioIntegral biomodified bovine pericardial graft may be an option as it shows reasonable results in terms of reinfection, in aortic tube and bifurcated grafts.

How to combine CTA, 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?

PURPOSE

We aimed at comparing 99mTc-HMPAO white blood cells (99mTc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, we attempted to define a new visual score for interpreting [18F]FDG PET/CT scans aiming at increasing its specificity.

METHODS

We prospectively compared 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT, [18F]FDG PET/CT, and CTA in 26 patients with suspected abdominal VGEI. WBC scans were performed and interpreted according to EANM recommendations. [18F]FDG PET/CT studies were assessed with both qualitative (Sah's scale and new visual score) and semi-quantitative analyses. CTA images were interpreted according to MAGIC criteria. Microbiology, histopathology or a clinical follow-up of at least 24 months were used to achieve final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Eleven out of 26 patients were infected. [18F]FDG PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and NPV, with both scoring systems, thus representing an efficient tool to rule out the infection. The use of a more detailed scoring system provided statistically higher specificity compared to the previous Sah's scale (p = 0.049). 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT provided statistically higher specificity and PPV than [18F]FDG PET/CT, regardless the interpretation criteria used and it can be, therefore, used in early post-surgical phases or to confirm or rule out a PET/CT finding.

CONCLUSIONS

After CTA, patients with suspected late VGEI should perform a [18F]FDG PET/CT given its high sensitivity and NPV. However, given its lower specificity, positive results should be confirmed with 99mTc-WBC scintigraphy. The use of a more detailed scoring system reduces the number of 99mTc-WBC scans needed after [18F]FDG PET/CT. Nevertheless, in suspected infections within 4 months from surgery, 99mTc-WBC SPECT/CT should be performed as second exam, due to its high accuracy in differentiating sterile inflammation from infection.

Postoperative imaging of thoracic aortic repairs

Imaging plays a crucial role in the postoperative monitoring of thoracic aortic repairs. With the development of multiple surgical techniques to repair the ascending aorta and aortic arch, it can be a daunting challenge for the radiologist to diagnose potential pathologies in this sea of various techniques, each with their own normal postoperative appearance and potential complications. In this paper, we will provide a comprehensive review of the postoperative imaging in the setting of thoracic aortic repairs, including the role of imaging, components of thoracic aortic repairs, the normal postoperative appearance, and potential complications.

[18F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: After endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), an increased [¹⁸F]FDG uptake may be observed at PET/CT, being common to both vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Increased non-specific metabolic activity, due to foreign body reaction, can persist for several years after surgery, thus complicating the interpretation of PET/CT studies. In this paper, we aimed to assess [¹⁸F]FDG distribution at different time-points after the implant of abdominal Endurant^® endografts in patients without suspicion of infection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated [¹⁸F]FDG/CT in 16 oncological patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with Endurant^® grafts. Patients had no clinical suspicion of infection and were followed up for at least 24 months after scan. [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans were interpreted using both visual and semi-quantitative analyses. Results: The time between the EVAR procedure and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT ranged between 1 and 36 months. All grafts showed mild and diffuse [¹⁸F]FDG uptake without a focal pattern. Mean values of SUVmax were 2.63 ± 0.48 (95% CI 2.38-2.88); for SUVmean 1.90 ± 0.33 (95% CI 1.72-2.08); for T/B ratios 1.43 ± 0.41 (95% CI 1.21-1.65). SUVmax and SUVmean were not correlated to the time elapsed from the procedure, but we observed a declining trend in T/B ratio over time. Conclusions: Endovascular implant of Endurant^® grafts does not cause a significant inflammatory reaction. The evidence of faint and diffuse [¹⁸F]FDG uptake along the graft can reliably exclude an infection, even in early post-procedural phases. Therefore, in patients with a low probability of VGEI, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT can also be performed immediately after EVAR.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Evidence-based guideline of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on imaging infection in vascular grafts

Purpose

Consensus on optimal imaging procedure for vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is still lacking and the choice of a diagnostic test is often based on the experience of single centres. This document provides evidence-based recommendations aiming at defining which imaging modality may be preferred in different clinical settings and post-surgical time window.

Methods

This working group includes 6 nuclear medicine physicians appointed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, 4 vascular surgeons, and 2 radiologists. Vascular surgeons formulated 5 clinical questions that were converted into 10 statements and addressed through a systematic analysis of available literature by using PICOs (Population/problem–Intervention/Indicator–Comparator–Outcome) strategy. Each consensus statement was scored for level of evidence and for recommendation grade, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria.

Results

Sixty-six articles, published from January 2000 up to December 2021, were analysed and used for evidence-based recommendations.

Conclusion

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the first-line imaging modality in suspected VGEI but nuclear medicine modalities are often needed to confirm or exclude the infection. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) has very high negative predictive value but it should be performed preferably at least 4 months after surgery to avoid false positive results. Radiolabelled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy, given its high diagnostic accuracy, can be performed at any time after surgery.

Preamble

The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional no-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine. The EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the EANM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The EANM recognizes that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the EANM suggests caution against the use of the current consensus document in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgement regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in the light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the consensus document, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the consensus document when, in the reasonable judgement of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the consensus document. The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to this consensus document will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient, to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of this consensus document is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05769-x.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection using [18F]-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection (AGI) using [18F]-FDG PET/CT.

METHODS

PET/CT was performed in 50 patients with clinically suspected AGI. 12 oncological patients with aortic repair but without suspicion of AGI were included in the analysis to serve as control cohort. The [18F]-FDG uptake pattern around the graft was assessed using (a) a five-point visual grading scale (VGS), (b) SUVmax and (c) different graft-to-background ratios (GBRs). The diagnostic performance of VGS, SUVmax and GBRs was assessed and compared by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

28 infected and 34 uninfected grafts were identified by standard of reference. SUVmax and VGS were the most powerful predictors for the diagnosis of AGI according to the area under the curve (AUC 0.988 and 0.983, respectively) without a significant difference compared to GBRs. SUVmax and VGS showed congruent and accurate findings in 54 patients (i.e. either both positive or negative), yielding sensitivity and specificity (100%) in this subgroup of patients.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative analysis by SUVmax and qualitative analysis by VGS are highly effective in the diagnosis of AGI and should be tested as an outcome measure in prospective trials.

Prosthetic vascular graft infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT

INTRODUCTION

There is a high risk of mortality and morbidity associated with Vascular Graft Infections (VGI) which requires early diagnosis. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 18FDG PET/CT in diagnosing VGI.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines through a search in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. We evaluated five parameters including specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and accuracy. We used STATA/MP 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) for all of our analyses.

RESULTS

Overall 10 studies including 320 patients undergone 18FDG PET/CT were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios along with their 95% CI were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95), 0.76 (95% CI 0.76-0.70), 3.49 (95% CI 3.49-2.32) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.09-0.23), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for diagnosis of VGI was 37.12 (95% CI 14.84-92.82). The mean cut-off value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for diagnosis of VGI was 5.39 while the overall mean SUVmax among patients with VGI was 8.47.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, 18FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic method in detecting active VGI with high diagnostic accuracy. Because of its ability to evaluate morphology and main texture using SUVmax, the 18FDG PET/CT provides an objective assessment of aspects and extent of disease activity, which results in preventing unnecessary surgery, proper treatment planning, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment.

Are 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography results reliable in patients with ascending aortic grafts? A prospective study in non-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to define characteristic patterns of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in non-infected patients with ascending aortic prosthetic grafts during the first year after surgery.

METHODS

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively in 26 uninfected patients. Clinical, analytical and microbiological (blood culture) assessments were performed to confirm the absence of infection. FDG uptake intensity [measured through maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the target-to-background ratio] and distribution patterns were obtained. Models of generalized estimating equations were used to assess the evolution of the SUVmax over time. The results were compared to those in our endocarditis-over-ascending-aortic-graft series database. The receiver operating characteristic curves of the control group and the 12-month group were assessed.

RESULTS

All patients showed increased uptake in all areas. The uptake pattern was heterogeneous in 47.4%, 43.5% and 42.3% at 3, 6 and 12 months. The means and standard deviations of the SUVmax in the graft were 4.80 (±0.99), 4.28 (±0.88) and 4.14 (±0.87) at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. A comparison of all values obtained in the 6th and 12th months compared to those from the 3rd month revealed a slow decrease that may persist after the first year. The cut-off value of SUVmax of 4.24 had an overall sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 57.7% for patients seen at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-infected ascending aortic grafts showed no predominant uptake pattern; they also showed increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose activity that could persist beyond the first year. Caution is therefore recommended when interpreting PET/CT images obtained during the first year after surgery.

[18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the diagnosis of vascular graft infection]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate diagnostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in patients with suspected vascular graft (VG) infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective analysis included data of 30 PET/CT examinations for suspected infection of aortic VG (n=27) and bypass grafts (n=3) after surgical treatment (median 48 months). In 77% (23/30) of cases, the diagnosis was initially «possible» (n=11) or «rejected» (n=12) in accordance with common diagnostic criteria. All PET/CT results were verified by clinical, laboratory and intraoperative («=20) data. VG infection was confirmed in 18 patients and ruled out in 12 cases.

RESULTS

PET/CT confirmed VG infection in 94% (17/18) and excluded in 50% (6/12) of cases. False PET/CT results were obtained in 23% (7/30) cases: false positive in 6 cases and false negative in 1 case. Thus, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT were 94%, 50% and 77%, respectively; positive and negative predictive value - 74% and 86%. PET/CT results allowed correct reclassifying 33% (10/30) of cases. VG infection was confirmed in 73% (8/11) of patients with initially «possible» diagnosis and excluded in 17% (2/12) of patients with initially «rejected» infection. Moreover, whole body PET/CT revealed unknown inflammation foci outside VG in 73% (22/30) of cases. These data were applied to correct treatment approach in 80% (24/30) of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the diagnosis of VG infection. Despite low specificity, this technique has high sensitivity and accuracy that allowed reclassifying 33% of cases.

State of the art of 18F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation

AIM

The diagnosis, severity and extent of a sterile inflammation or a septic infection could be challenging since there is not one single test able to achieve an accurate diagnosis. The clinical use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the assessment of inflammation and infection is increasing worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to achieve an Italian consensus document on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases, such as osteomyelitis (OM), prosthetic joint infections (PJI), infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDI), systemic and cardiac sarcoidosis (SS/CS), diabetic foot (DF), fungal infections (FI), tuberculosis (TBC), fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO), pediatric infections (PI), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), spine infections (SI), vascular graft infections (VGI), large vessel vasculitis (LVV), retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) and COVID-19 infections.

METHODS

In September 2020, the inflammatory and infectious diseases focus group (IIFG) of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) proposed to realize a procedural paper about the clinical applications of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases. The project was carried out thanks to the collaboration of 13 Italian nuclear medicine centers, with a consolidate experience in this field. With the endorsement of AIMN, IIFG contacted each center, and the pediatric diseases focus group (PDFC). IIFG provided for each team involved, a draft with essential information regarding the execution of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI scan (i.e., indications, patient preparation, standard or specific acquisition modalities, interpretation criteria, reporting methods, pitfalls and artifacts), by limiting the literature research to the last 20 years. Moreover, some clinical cases were required from each center, to underline the teaching points. Time for the collection of each report was from October to December 2020.

RESULTS

Overall, we summarized 291 scientific papers and guidelines published between 1998 and 2021. Papers were divided in several sub-topics and summarized in the following paragraphs: clinical indications, image interpretation criteria, future perspectivess and new trends (for each single disease), while patient preparation, image acquisition, possible pitfalls and reporting modalities were described afterwards. Moreover, a specific section was dedicated to pediatric and PET/MRI indications. A collection of images was described for each indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in oncology is globally accepted and standardized in main diagnostic algorithms for neoplasms. In recent years, the ever-closer collaboration among different European associations has tried to overcome the absence of a standardization also in the field of inflammation and infections. The collaboration of several nuclear medicine centers with a long experience in this field, as well as among different AIMN focus groups represents a further attempt in this direction. We hope that this document will be the basis for a "common nuclear physicians' language" throughout all the country.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w.

PET/CT with 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose in patients with suspected endovascular prosthesis infection

OBJECTIVE

Infection of large vessel prostheses is a rare but critical complication. The aim of this work is to assess the impact of PET/CT with 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose (PET-FDG) on the diagnosis of infection in our environment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients (38 scans) were evaluated for suspected prosthetic infection. A qualitative analysis was performed taking into account the distribution of the radiopharmaceutical, categorizing the studies as positive or negative for infection. Those with focal or multifocal deposits along the vascular prosthesis were considered positive, and negative if a homogeneous and diffuse distribution over the whole prosthesis was observed, or a total absence of uptake. A semi-quantitative analysis was performed using SUVmax and average SUV values, and a metabolic index was calculated (SUVmax of the graft / average SUV of the normal vascular pool).

RESULTS

The PET-FDG study was positive in 20 patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 84%. The 38 PET-FDG scans performed showed positive capture patterns (focal in 6, multifocal in 15, diffuse in 4) and negative pattern in the remaining 13. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values obtained for the PET-FDG were 95%, 89%, 90% and 94%, and for the AngioTC study 50%, 73%, 73% and 50%, respectively. The area values under the ROC curve were as follows: for the AngioTC 0.642 (not significant), and for the SUVmax values of 0.925 (p<0.005), average SUV of 0.922 (p<0.005) and for the metabolic index of 0.917 (p<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The PET-FDG proves to be a tool with high diagnostic accuracy in the infection of vascular prosthesis, both visual analysis according to patterns and semi-quantitative.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluoro-d-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography interpretation methods in vascular graft and endograft infection

OBJECTIVE

Vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI) has high morbidity and mortality rates. Diagnosis is complicated because symptoms vary and can be nonspecific. A meta-analysis identified ¹⁸F-fluoro-d-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) as the most valuable tool for diagnosis of VGEI and favorable to computed tomography as the current standard. However, the availability and varied use of several interpretation methods, without consensus on which interpretation method is best, complicate clinical use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different interpretation methods of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis of VGEI.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources included PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis was conducted on the different interpretation methods for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis of VGEI, including visual FDG uptake intensity, visual FDG uptake pattern, and quantitative maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax).

RESULTS

Of 613 articles, 13 were included (10 prospective and 3 retrospective articles). The FDG uptake pattern method (I² = 26.2%) showed negligible heterogeneity, whereas the FDG uptake intensity (I² = 42.2%) and SUVmax (I² = 42.1%) methods showed moderate heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity for FDG uptake intensity was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96); for uptake pattern, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97); and for SUVmax, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99). The pooled specificity for FDG uptake intensity was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.38-0.78); for FDG uptake pattern, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.88); and for SUVmax, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87). The uptake pattern interpretation method demonstrated the best positive and negative post-test probability, 82% and 10%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identified the FDG uptake pattern as the most accurate assessment method of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of VGEI. The optimal SUVmax cutoff, depending on the vendor, demonstrated strong sensitivity and moderate specificity.

In situ revascularization with rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft for aortic infection: Results of a retrospective monocentric series of 18 cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short and long-term results of in situ prosthetic graft treatment using rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft in patients with aortic infection.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

All the patients surgically managed in our center for an aortic infection were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the intra-hospital mortality, secondary outcomes were limb salvage, persistent or recurrent infection, prosthetic graft patency, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to December 2015, 18 consecutive patients (12 men and 6 women) were operated on for aortic infection. Six mycotic aneurysms and 12 prosthetic infections, including 8 para-entero-prosthetic fistulas, were treated. In 5 cases, surgery was performed in emergency. During the early postoperative period, we performed one major amputation and two aortic infections were persistent. Intra-hospital mortality was 27.7%. The median follow-up among the 13 surviving patients was 26 months. During follow-up, none of the 13 patients presented reinfection or bypass thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

This series shows that in situ revascularization with rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft for aortic infection have results in agreement with the literature in terms of intra-hospital mortality with a low reinfection rate.

Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infections: A Consensus Paper amongst Different Specialists

Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery that is associated with a bad prognosis and high mortality rate. An accurate and prompt identification of the infection and its extent is crucial for the correct management of the patient. However, standardized diagnostic algorithms and a univocal consensus on the best strategy to reach a diagnosis still do not exist. This review aims to summarize different radiological and Nuclear Medicine (NM) modalities commonly adopted for the imaging of VGI. Moreover, we attempt to provide evidence-based answers to several practical questions raised by clinicians and surgeons when they approach imaging in order to plan the most appropriate radiological or NM examination for their patients.

Diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspected diagnosis of vascular graft infection: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical diagnosis is complex, requiring image testing such as CT angiography or leukocyte scintigraphy, which has considerable limitations. The aim of this study was to know the diagnostic yield of PET/CT with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in patients with suspected PVGI.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study including 49 patients with suspected PVGI, median age of 62 ± 14 years. Three uptake patterns were defined following published recommendations: (i) focal, (ii) patched (PVGI criteria), and (iii) diffuse (no PVGI criterion).

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for 18F-FDG-PET/CT were 88%, 79%, 67%, and 93%, respectively. 18F-FDG-PET/CT identified 14/16 cases of PVGI showing a focal (n = 10) or patched pattern (n = 4), being true negative in 26/33 cases with either a diffuse pattern (n = 16) or without uptake (n = 10). Five of the seven false-positive cases (71%) showed a patched pattern and all coincided with the application of adhesives for PVG placement.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG-PET/CT is a useful technique for the diagnosis of PVGI. A patched pattern on PET/CT in patients in whom adhesives were applied for prosthetic vascular graft placement does not indicate infection.

18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT effectively contribute to early diagnosis of infection of arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

An arteriovenous graft (AVG) is indicated in hemodialysis patients with failed arteriovenous access. Early treatment of AVG infection is important because an advanced prosthetic infection leads to the removal of the prosthesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT in early detection of AVG infections.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one AVGs were evaluated. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT studies were performed at intervals of 10, 20-30, and 40-50 weeks after AVG insertion. Agreement between the imaging methods and reference parameters (i.e. clinical presentation, C-reactive protein and microbiological findings on the hemodialysis cannula extracted after hemodialysis from AVG) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The study results showed that focal accumulation of the radiopharmaceuticals can be considered a sign of AVG infection. At 10 weeks after AVG implantation, the focal ¹⁸F-FDG findings showed the best agreement with the reference parameters (agreement coefficients AC1 - clinical status: 0.693, CRP: 0.605, cannula microbiology: 0.518, respectively). At 20 to 30 weeks after AVG implantation, the diagnostic value of focal ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC accumulation increased (AC1 coefficients: 0.658, 0.658, 0.408) and was similar to that of focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (AC1s: 0.656, 0.570, 0.409). Between 40 and 50 weeks since AVG implantation, the diagnostic significance of focal ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC accumulation (AC1 coefficients: 0.771, 0.811, 0.611) slightly exceeded the diagnostic value of focal ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation (AC1 coefficients: 0.524, 0.456, 0.569).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT can both serve as important tools contributing to early diagnosis of AVG infection.

How to recognize stent graft infection after endovascular aortic repair: the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in an infrequent but serious clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of stent graft infection (SGI).

METHODS

In a retrospective study, two nuclear medicine physicians have independently analyzed 17 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations performed for clinical suspicion of SGI. The images were evaluated for the uptake pattern and intensity, and by the maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max), the target-to-background ratio with blood pool (TBR_BP) and liver uptake (TBR_hep) as a reference. The SGI was defined as the presence of focal hyperactivity with an intensity exceeding hepatic uptake. CT images were independently assessed for signs of SGI. Clinical review of all further patients' data served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Nine cases were established as SGI by the clinical review. PET/CT correctly diagnosed SGI in eight and yielded a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 100%. The mean SUV_max, TBR_BP, and TBR_hep values were 9.8 ± 4.0, 6.9 ± 2.6, and 4.6 ± 1.7 in the group of patients with true SGI, and 4.0 ± 1.1, 2.5 ± 0.4 (p < 0.001) and 1.9 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001) in true negative cases, respectively. CT alone showed a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100% and was concordant with PET/CT in 14 cases. The best performing threshold values of SUV_max, TBR_BP, and TBR_hep were 5.6, 3.5, and 2.2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with expert evaluation, semiquantitative and quantitative image analysis with the proposed threshold values for SUV_max, TBR_BP, and TBR_hep has good diagnostic accuracy in the detection of SGI. We propose that visual grading scale for SGI should use hepatic uptake as a visual reference.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detection of infected prosthetic vascular grafts

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of vascular prosthetic graft infection (VPGI) using a diagnostic accuracy test.

METHODS

The MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases, from the earliest available date of indexing through March 31, 2018, were searched for results investigating the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of VPGI. We calculated the pooled sensitivities and specificities of included studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and obtained summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 10 studies (286 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98) without heterogeneity (I² = 40.2; 95% CI, 0.0-84.4; P = .09), and pooled specificity was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81) without heterogeneity (I² = 39.9; 95% CI, 0.0-84.3; P = .09). Likelihood ratio syntheses showed an overall positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI, 2.9-4.9) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.15). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 63 (95% CI, 23-173). The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed the area under the curve to be 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the high sensitivity and moderate specificity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of VPGI. The clinical usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of VPGI should be validated through further large multicenter studies.

18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of Vascular Prosthetic Graft Infection: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

For the diagnosis of vascular prosthetic graft infection (VPGI), an intra-operative peri-graft biopsy is often required. Controversy exists regarding the use of imaging techniques in the diagnostic process. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in VPGI.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, applying a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary searches adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators, and limits to identify studies assessing the use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of VPGI. A meta-analysis was conducted using a mixed effects logistic regression bivariate model.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified reporting a total of 433 prostheses, of which 202 were proven to be infected. Analysis of PET scan was performed using five different methods: graded uptake, focal uptake, maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), tissue to background ratio (TBR), and dual time point (DTP). The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for graded uptake were 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-0.96) and 0.61 (95% CI 0.48-0.74), respectively; they were 0.93 (95% CI 0.83-0.97) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.53-0.92) for focal uptake; 0.98 (95% CI 0.42-0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.88) for SUVmax; 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.73) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) for TBR; and 1.00 (95% CI 0.48-1.00) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68-0.97) for DTP. Sensitivity analysis including studies that investigated the diagnostic accuracy of PET combined with computed tomography (CT) showed higher sensitivity and specificity for focal uptake, graded uptake, and SUVmax than 18F-FDG PET alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that 18F-FDG PET has a high sensitivity in diagnosing VPGI and its accuracy can be further increased by combining PET with CT.

The "3M" Approach to Cardiovascular Infections: Multimodality, Multitracers, and Multidisciplinary

Cardiovascular infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis is crucial for adequate patient management, as early treatment improves the prognosis. The diagnosis cannot be made on the basis of a single symptom, sign, or diagnostic test. Rather, the diagnosis requires a multidisciplinary discussion in addition to the integration of clinical signs, microbiology data, and imaging data. The application of multimodality imaging, including molecular imaging techniques, has improved the sensitivity to detect infections involving heart valves and vessels and implanted cardiovascular devices while also allowing for early detection of septic emboli and metastatic infections before these become clinically apparent. In this review, we describe data supporting the use of a Multimodality, Multitracer, and Multidisciplinary approach (the 3M approach) to cardiovascular infections. In particular, the role of white blood cell SPECT/CT and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in most prevalent and clinically relevant cardiovascular infections will be discussed. In addition, the needs of advanced hybrid equipment, dedicated imaging acquisition protocols, specific expertise for image reading, and interpretation in this field are discussed, emphasizing the need for a specific reference framework within a Cardiovascular Multidisciplinary Team Approach to select the best test or combination of tests for each specific clinical situation.

Intense 18F-FDG activity in aortoiliac bypass graft mimicking infection: A case report

RATIONALE

F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has the potential to become an important imaging tool for the diagnosis of suspected aortoiliac bypass graft infection (AGI).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 76-year-old man presented with incidental findings of intense F-FDG activity in previous operation site of aortobiiliac bypass graft in the initial staging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

DIAGNOSES

Based on F-FDG PET/CT examination, preliminary differential diagnosis was AGI.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed laboratory tests and Galliun-citrate (Ga) single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT).

OUTCOMES

He had no constitutional symptoms and abnormal laboratory test results suggesting AGI. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed no abnormal findings. Also, Ga planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis failed to show abnormal Ga uptake in the same site of aortobiiliac bypass graft with F-FDG uptake.

LESSONS

We present a case with postoperative inflammatory aortobiiliac bypass graft which was misdiagnosed as AGI based on intense F-FDG activity seen at PET/CT imaging.

Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection

BACKGROUND

The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI.

METHODS

Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing ¹⁸F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different ¹⁸F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize ¹⁸F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8.

RESULTS

The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Textural analysis to characterize ¹⁸F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.

F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging of cardiac and vascular inflammation and infection

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation forms an important core of the aetiopathogenic process involved in many diseases affecting the heart and the blood vessels. These diseases include infections as well as inflammatory non-infectious cardiovascular conditions. The common feature of this is invasion of the heart or blood vessel by inflammatory cells. F-18 2-fluoro 2-deoxy-D glucose (FDG) is an analogue of glucose and like glucose it is taken up by activated inflammatory cells that accumulate at the site of infection. This has formed the basis of the use of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the non-invasive evaluation of human inflammatory diseases.

SOURCES OF DATA

This review is based on the published academic articles as well as our clinical experience.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

F-18 FDG PET/CT is a useful imaging modality in the evaluation of cardiovascular inflammatory disorders. Accumulation and distribution of F-18 FDG at the site of inflammation/infection corresponds to severity of the inflammation/infection and extent of involvement.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Most studies evaluating utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in imaging cardiovascular inflammation are small observational studies hence are potentially prone to bias.

GROWING POINTS

Being a hybrid metabolic and morphologic imaging technique, F-18 FDG PET/CT offers combined advantage of complementary anatomic and metabolic information in disease process. This makes it a useful modality in the diagnosis, determination of extent of disease, prognostication as well as treatment monitoring.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Larger prospective studies are needed to validate the superiority of F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging over conventional anatomic imaging modalities.

Cross-sectional imaging of aortic infections

Aortic infections are uncommon clinical entities, but are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. In this review, we focus on the cross-sectional imaging appearance of aortic infections, including aortic valve endocarditis, pyogenic aortitis, mycotic aneurysm and aortic graft infections, with an emphasis on CT, MRI and PET/CT appearance. Teaching Points • Aortic infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality. • CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT play complementary roles in aortic infection imaging. • Radiologists should be vigilant for aortic infection manifestations to ensure timely diagnosis.

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a case of suspected vascular graft infection

Vascular prosthetic graft infection (VPGI) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. An early and accurate diagnosis is essential in order to give the most appropriate treatment. The case is presented of a 74 year old male subjected to an aortobifemoral bypass graft, with clinical suspicion of VPGI with inconclusive tests. Later on an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study showed a pathological uptake, suggestive of periprosthetic infection, as well as an incidental pulmonary lesion, suggestive of a primary neoplasm. A new ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT showed a significant improvement in the uptake by the vascular graft after prolonged antibiotic treatment. ¹⁸F-FDG is a promising tracer for detecting VPGI as the accumulated activated white cells at the infection site have a high demand for ¹⁸F-FDG, and could help define the response to antibiotic treatment.

False-positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a patient with metallic implants following chondrosarcoma resection

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) has been used for the staging and evaluation of recurrence in cancer patients. We herein report a false-positive result of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) scan in a patient following chondrosarcoma resection and metallic implanting. A 35-year-old male patient with chondrosarcoma of the left iliac bone underwent radical resection, metal brace implanting and radiotherapy. A high uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG was observed in the metallic implants and adjacent tissue during PET/CT scanning in the 5th year of follow-up. Tissue biopsy and follow-up examination identified no tumor recurrence or infection at these sites, suggesting that the results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT must be interpreted with caution in cancer patients with metallic implants.