Editor's Choice – First Results of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Aortobifemoral bypass vs covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation

BACKGROUND

Covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) is increasingly used as a first line-treatment in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent CERAB compared with the gold standard of aortobifemoral bypass (ABF).

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for patients who underwent ABF or CERAB from 2009 to 2021. Propensity scores were generated using demographics, comorbidities, Rutherford class, and urgency. The two groups were matched using 5-to-1 nearest-neighbor match. Our primary outcomes were 1-year estimates of primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), MALE-free survival, reintervention-free survival, and amputation-free survival. Standard statistical methods were used.

RESULTS

A total of 3944 ABF and 281 CERAB cases were identified. Of all patients with AIOD, the proportion of CERAB increased from 0% to 17.9% between 2009 and 2021. Compared with ABF, patients who underwent CERAB were more likely to be older (64.7 vs 60.2; P < .001) and more often had diabetes (40.9% vs 24.1%; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease (1.1% vs 0.3%; P = .03). In the matched analysis (229 CERAB vs 929 ABF), ABF patients had improved MALE-free survival (93.2% [±0.9%] vs 83.2% [±3%]; P < .001) and lower rates of MALE (5.2% [±0.9%] vs 14.1% [±3%]; P < .001), with comparable primary patency rates (98.3% [±0.3%] vs 96.6% [±1%]; P = .6) and amputation-free survival (99.3% [±0.3%] vs 99.4% [±0.6%]; P = .9). Patients in the CERAB group had significantly lower reintervention-free survival (62.5% [±6%] vs 92.9% [±0.9%]; P < .001). Matched analysis also revealed shorter length of stay (1 vs 7 days; P < .001), as well as lower pulmonary (1.2% vs 6.6%; P = .01), renal (1.8% vs 10%; P < .001), and cardiac (1.8% vs 12.8%; P < .001) complications among CERAB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CERAB had lower perioperative morbidity compared with ABF with a similar primary patency 1-year estimates. However, patients who underwent CERAB experienced more major adverse limb events and reinterventions. Although CERAB is an effective treatment for patients with AIOD, further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of CERAB compared with the established durability of ABF and further define the role of CEARB in the treatment of AIOD.

Covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation: A systematic review aggregated data and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the early and midterm efficacy and safety of covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in the treatment of aortoiliac disease (AID).

METHODS

A systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published by August 2023 was performed. The primary end points were primary patency and secondary patency.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective case series, involving 579 patients, were incorporated in the review with 88.9% of the included lesions being categorized as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C or D. The pooled primary patency estimates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.4-99.7), 84.4% (95% CI, 72.3-98.5) and 83.8% (95% CI, 71.4-98.3) respectively. The mean primary patency time, representing the period during which individuals remained event-free, was 51.9 months (95% CI, 43.6-55.4). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly claudicant patient population (>75% of patients) was 89.4% (95% CI, 78.5-100.0), compared with 71.5% (95% CI, 45.6-100.0) for studies with a mixed population (50% of patients). The pooled 36 months primary patency for studies with a predominantly TASC D patient population (>82% of patients) was 70.4% (95% CI, 46.4-100.0) compared with 91.0% (95% CI, 79.1-100.0) for studies with a more homogenous cohort. The pooled secondary patency estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 98.6% (95% CI, 96.2-100.0), 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), and 97% (95% CI, 93.1-100.0), respectively. The pooled technical success, 30-day mortality and 30-day systemic complications estimates were 95.9% (95% CI, 93.7- 97.4), 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.5), and 6.4% (95% CI, 4.4-9.1), respectively. The pooled intraoperative and postoperative 30-day CERAB-related complications estimates were 7.3% (95% CI, 2.0-23.0) and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.7-21.0), respectively. The pooled major amputation and target lesion reinterventions by the end of follow-up were 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0-3.4) and 13.9% (95% CI, 9.9-19.2), respectively. The pooled access site complication estimate was 11.7% (95% CI, 5.9-21.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this review has showcased the safety and feasibility of the CERAB technique in treating AID, it has also highlighted the necessity for a close and prolonged follow-up period extending beyond 1 year. Moreover, the favorable secondary patency estimates predominantly attained via endovascular reinterventions emphasize a potentially advantageous characteristic of the CERAB technique, particularly valuable when addressing late-stage AID disease or anatomically complex lesions.

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Unibody Endoprosthesis and Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has traditionally been treated with aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). Unibody endograft (UBE) for AIOD, however, has been increasingly utilized in selected patients. We report outcomes of patients undergoing ABF or UBE for AIOD.

METHODS

Patients (2016-2021) undergoing elective ABF or UBE with a unibody device for AIOD were identified at an academic institution. Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate outcomes by group.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients undergoing UBE or ABF were screened, with 82 included. Twenty-one patients underwent UBE (25.6%) and 61 (74.4%) underwent ABF. UBE patients were older (63.8 vs. 58.2 years; P = 0.01), with a higher prevalence of diabetes (52.4 vs. 19.7%; P = 0.004). Significant differences were seen between UBE and ABF including a shorter surgery length (214 vs. 360 min; P = 0.0001), less blood loss (300 vs. 620 mls; P = 0.001), larger minimum aortic diameter (14.6 vs. 12.6; P = 0.0006), larger common iliac artery (9.5 vs. 7.9; P = 0.005) and lower postoperative ankle-brachial index (0.8 vs. 0.9; P = 0.04). There were no differences in TASC C/D iliac lesions in the UBE than ABF group (66.6% vs. 63.9%; P < 0.82) or Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification femoropopliteal lesions. Unadjusted analysis revealed no significant differences between UBE and ABF for 30-day mortality (0 vs. 1.6%; P = 1), stroke (0 vs. 3.3%; P = 1), or major adverse cardiac events (4.8 vs. 4.9%; P = 1). There were no significant differences in mid-term surgical outcomes over a mean follow-up period of 23.7 months between UBE and ABF groups; specifically endovascular (0 vs. 8.2%; P = 0.3) or open/hybrid reintervention (9.5 vs. 14.8%; P = 0.7) with similar limb occlusion (4.8 vs. 27.8; P = 0.12). Kaplan-Meier estimated primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 36 months were similar with 94%, 100%, and 94% for UBE and 86%, 95%, and 86% for ABF, respectively. Estimated survival at 36 months was 95% for UBE and 97% for ABF (P = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Equivalent outcomes were seen between AIOD treated with UBE or ABF in similar patient populations. Mid-term outcomes such as reintervention and patency are similar for UBE and ABF. We still recommend ABF over UBE as a primary modality of treatment in surgically fit patients with greater complexity aortoiliac lesions and with smaller arterial diameters, especially women.

Combination of BeGraft and Solaris Stent Grafts for the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation-BS-CERAB Technique

Background: This study examines the impact of the use of the combination of BeGraft and Solaris stent grafts on the outcomes during the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (BS-CERAB) technique and extension to the iliac arteries. Methods: Consecutive patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease who underwent endovascular treatment using BS-CERAB between January 2020 and December 2023 were included. Patient demographics, symptoms, lesion characteristics, and procedural and follow-up details were collected and analyzed. Perioperative complications and reinterventions were also identified. Results: A total of 42 patients met the inclusion criteria (32 men, 76.2%, median age 72 years, range 59-85). Indications for treatment were intermittent claudication (42.9%) and critical limb ischemia (57.1%). Procedure success was achieved in all cases. The median patient follow-up time was 14 months (1-36). One patient died at a 10-month follow-up due to lung cancer. The mean pre-operative ABI increased from 0.37 ± 0.19 before intervention to 0.71 ± 1.23 post-operatively at 12 months (p = 0.037). The estimated primary patency rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 90.5%, 85.7%, and 81.0% and primary assisted patency rates were 90.5%, 90.5%, and 85.7%, respectively. Secondary patency was 95.2% at 3 and 6 months and 90.5% at a 12-month follow-up. Active cancer (p = 0.023, OR 2.12 95%CI 1.14-3.25) was a risk factor for restenosis. Conclusions: This mid-term experience shows that the CERAB technique using the combination of BeGraft and Solaris stents grafts, for the endovascular treatment of severe aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease, may allow an effective reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation and iliac arteries related to high-patency and lower-reintervention rates.

Results of endovascular treatments of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus C or D aortoiliac occlusive disease involving the aortic bifurcation

Objectives

The current study aims to report midterm results of patients treated with endovascular intervention, kissing stent, or covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation, for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus C or D aortoiliac occlusive disease involving the aortic bifurcation.

Methods

Eighteen patients who have intermittent claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus C or D aortoiliac occlusive disease involving the aortic bifurcation enrolled to the study between January 2018 and January 2021. Kissing stents, Advanta V12 (Atrium, Getinge Group), were used in 13 patients, and the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation technique was used in 4 patients to reconstruct the aortic bifurcation. The patients were followed for a median of 49 months (min. 2, max.58 months). Patency rates, mortality, morbidities, and reinterventions were recorded.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 60.4 ± 10 years. Technical success was achieved in 94.4% of the patients, but one patient had to convert to open surgery. Primary patency rate of the remaining patients was 85.6% at 58 months. Target lesion revascularization rate was 11.7%. One patient had successful reintervention for in stent restenosis, and secondary patency rate was 93.3% at 58 months. Limb salvage rate was 84.6% during the follow-up. Two patients had myocardial infarction (11.1%) and one mortality (5.6%) occurred because of cerebrovascular event in the follow-up.

Conclusions

Endovascular techniques can be used safely for reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation in Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus C or D aortoiliac occlusive disease in selected patients who have high risk for open surgery. Covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation is the only technique that showed patency rates approaching open surgery in treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease involving the aortic bifurcation to date. Although promising patency results were achieved with kissing-covered stents, long-term patency rates were still lower than those achieved with open surgery. Further randomized controlled studies comparing the long-term results of these techniques are needed.

AFX unibody stent graft: Effective and safe for the treatment of severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine the primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates of the Endologix AFX stent-graft in patients considered high risk for open surgery with complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease. The secondary objective was to determine 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of clinical records of 38 patients who underwent AFX stent-graft placement for aorto-iliac occlusive disease from 2016 to 2019. Patient data was de-identified and entered into a REDcap secure database. Descriptive statistical analysis (means and standard deviations) and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created to determine the duration of patency of the AFX stent-graft system.

RESULTS

Primary patency rates at 6, 12 and 24 months were 92%, 92% and 84%, respectively. Assisted primary patency rates at these times were 100%, 100% and 93% with secondary patency of 100% maintained throughout. The incidence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was 8% and major adverse limb events was 3%. One death unrelated to the AFX device occurred during the study period though outside of the 30-day peri-operative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates of AFX stent-grafts, when used to treat aorto-iliac occlusive disease, are high. This study supports the use of the AFX stent-graft for the endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease as an alternative to other endovascular options as well as a safe alternative to open aorto-iliac or aorto-femoral bypass in patients who are at high risk for open procedures.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique in Patients With Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction is an endovascular technique, developed to reconstruct the aortic bifurcation in the most optimal anatomical and physiological manner. Short-term data were promising, but long-term data are still lacking. The objective was to report the long-term outcomes of CERAB for extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease and to identify predictors for loss of primary patency.

METHODS

Consecutive electively treated patients with CERAB for aorto-iliac occlusive disease in a single hospital were identified and analyzed. Baseline and procedural data and follow-up were collected at 6-weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success, procedural, and 30-day complications were evaluated, as well as overall survival. Patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization rates were analyzed using Kaplan Meier curves. Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify possible predictors of failure.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients were included (79 male). Indication for treatment was intermittent claudication for 121 patients (75.6%) and 133 patients (83.1%) had a TASC-II D lesion. Technical success was obtained in 95.6% of patients and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. The 5-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate of 84.4%. The strongest predictor of loss of primary patency of CERAB was a previous aorto-iliac intervention (odds ratio [OR]=5.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30; 22.07), p=0.020). In patients not previously treated in the aorto-iliac tract, 5-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were 85.1%, 94.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, an improved Rutherford was found in 97.9% of patients and the freedom from major amputation rate was 100%.

CONCLUSION

The CERAB technique is related to good long-term outcomes, particularly in primary cases. In patients that had prior treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease, there were more reinterventions and therefore surveillance should likely be more intense.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction was designed to improve outcomes of endovascular treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. At 5-year follow-up clinical improvement was found in 97.9% of patients without major amputations. The 5-year overall primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate of 84.4%. Significantly better patency rates were observed for patients that were never treated before in the target area. The data implicate that CERAB are a valid treatment option for patients with extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. For patients previously treated in the target area, other treatment options might be considered, or more intensive follow-up surveillance is warranted.

Aortoiliac: Covered, Uncovered, CERAB as It Relates to Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 200 million worldwide and is the leading cause of major limb amputation, with individuals suffering from PAD being at three times greater risk of dying compared with matched controls. TASC-II guidelines provide a consensus on the management of PAD based on the collaboration between international vascular specialties. These guidelines previously outlined open surgery as the gold standard for treatment of aortoiliac disease and PAD as it has demonstrated consistent long-term results. However, this approach is also associated with high perioperative mortality, especially when compared with endovascular techniques. With recent developments in endovascular technology, user technique, and experience, this approach has become more widely used as primary intervention for aortoiliac disease. One of these novel techniques includes covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation, which has demonstrated excellent technical success and improved primary and secondary patency rates with follow-up. The aim of this review is to compare the efficacy of these approaches to the treatment of aortoiliac disease and demonstrate the benefits of the shift toward an endovascular-first approach to treatment of this disease, regardless of lesion complexity or severity.

Endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease with TASC II C and D lesions: 10 year's experience of clinical technique

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D lesions. In addition, 10 years of experience with interventional procedures and treatment options in our center were also worthy of further discussion.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2020, a total of 26 consecutive AIOD patients with TASC-II C and D lesions treated endovascular approach were enrolled in this study. Patients' demographic and clinical data were collected, and the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy were evaluated. In addition, operation procedures were also described.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 62.2 ± 7 years (49-57 years), and the mean body mass index of patients was 24.2 ± 2.6 kg/m². Fifteen patients (57.7%) were Rutherford 4, 5 each (19.2%) were Rutherford 3 and 5, and 1 (3.8%) was Rutherford 2. No other serious complications occurred except death in 3 patients. Most of the patients (73.1%) had a history of smoking, and hypertension and hyperlipidemia were common comorbidities. Endovascular therapy was successfully performed in 25 patients, and the technical success rate was 96.2%. The patient's ankle-brachial index improved significantly postoperatively compared with preoperatively (preoperative 0.33 ± 0.14 vs 1.0 ± 0.09, P < 0.001). The primary patency rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 91.3% at 1, 3, and 5 years, while the secondary patency rates were 100%. No treatment-related deaths or serious complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of AIOD patients with TASC-II C and D lesions might be safe and have a high rate of middle-term and long-term primary patency.

The influence of narrow aortic bifurcation on limb graft patency: a two-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) has been considered as a potential risk factor for graft limb thrombosis after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to compare mid- and long-term outcome of EVAR in patients with NAB and standard aortic bifurcation (SAB).

METHODS

Data from patients receiving EVAR were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. In case of angiographic limb stenosis (>50%), additional stenting was performed. Patients with a NAB (≤20mm) were included in the NAB group, the remaining patients in the SAB group. Primary endpoints were limb thrombosis rate and technical success.

RESULTS

A total of 902 patients were included; 18.3% (N.=165/902) in the NAB and 81.7% (N.=737/902) in the SAB group. Mean follow-up time was 43 months (range 0-198 months). Bilateral stenting of the aortic bifurcation was performed in 2.7% (N.=27/902), 8.5% (N.=14/165) in the NAB and 1.4% (N.=10/737) in the SAB group (P=0.001). Limb thrombosis was found in 2.8% (N.=25/902), 3.6% (N.=6/165) in the NAB and 2.6% (N.=19/737) in the SAB group (P=0.55). Technical success was 97.8%, 98.8% in the NAB and 97.6% in the SAB group (P=0.33). Device related reintervention rate was 16% (N.=144/902), 15.2% in the NAB and 16.1% in the SAB group (P=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard EVAR could safely be performed in patients with NAB (≤20mm) when a low threshold for additional stenting was applied. This resulted in no significant higher incidence of limb thrombosis. Additional stent deployment did not increase the complication rate.

Endovascular Aorto-Iliac Reconstruction vs. Aortobifemoral Bypass as First Choice for a Durable Revascularization for Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

INTRODUCTION

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is defined as atherosclerotic obstruction of the distal abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Multiple options exist for management of AIOD including endovascular aortoiliac reconstruction and aortobifemoral bypass. As new technologies are developed, the best approach to manage this condition is evolving.

METHODS

We performed a literature review to assess the current state of endovascular aortoiliac reconstruction and aortobifemoral bypass as options for revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular aortoiliac reconstruction and aortobifemoral bypass are both feasible and clinically effective options for management of aortoiliac occlusive disease. No randomized controlled trial has been performed to show one option to be more effective than the other. Recent literature demonstrates comparable long-term patency, limb salvage and survival among endovascular approaches to the treatment of AIOD with quicker recovery, lower costs and improved quality of life when compared to open aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) surgery. Selection of procedure should be tailored to the individual patient in order to develop an effective long-term successful strategy for management of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Further study is warranted to define durability of these endovascular approaches as well as patient specific characteristics that influence outcomes.

Covered vs. Bare Metal Stents in the Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation: Early and Midterm Outcomes from the COBRA European Multicentre Registry

OBJECTIVE

To report outcomes following endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) using covered (CS) or bare metal (BMS) stent(s).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent treatment with CS or BMS for AIOD between November 2012 and March 2020 in 12 European centres. Outcome measures included death, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), major amputation, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

RESULTS

Overall, 252 patients (53% males; mean age 65 ± 10 years) were included (102 with a bare metal and 150 with a covered aortic stent); 122 (48%) presented with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Severe arterial calcification was noted in > 65% of patients, 70% presented with Trans-Atlantic Societies Consensus (TASC) D lesions, 32% and 46% had aortic or iliac chronic total occlusion (CTO), respectively. Median follow up was 17 months (range 6 - 40; none lost to follow up). Median inpatient stay was two days (range two to four). During the first 30 days, two patients died (both with covered aortic stents, because of cardiovascular events), none required TLR, two (1%) patients had a major amputation (all presented with CLTI), and three (1%) had a MACCE. At 17 months, mortality (BMS 14% vs. CS 7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 - 2.26, p = .94, log rank test) and TLR (11% vs. 10%, HR 1.98, 95% CI 0.89 - 4.43, p = .095) did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups; only three patients had a major limb amputation during late follow up (all with a covered stent). In a multivariable model, the use of an aortic CS did not influence TLR. In a conditional Cox regression, however, the concomitant use of aortic and iliac CSs was associated with improved freedom from TLR.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular reconstruction with aortic CSs or BMSs for severe AIOD showed comparable midterm performance. The use of both aortic and iliac CSs seems to be associated with reduced TLR.

[Hybrid revascularization in a patient with Covid-19 and chronic limb ischemia stage IV]

The authors report hybrid treatment of a patient with angina pectoris class II, multiple previous reconstructive interventions on the aortofemoral segment and chronic ischemia of the left lower limb stage IV and concomitant COVID-19. Coronary angiography was performed after regression of infectious disease under antiviral therapy. Occlusion of the left anterior descending artery was observed that required LAD stenting. On the next day, hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities was implemented: thrombectomy and endarterectomy from the branch of the aorto-femoral bypass graft and deep femoral artery at the first stage, stenting of the orifice of proximal branch of aorto-femoral bypass graft at the second stage, endarterectomy from superficial femoral artery, recanalization and stenting of superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery at the third stage and prosthetic- femoral bypass with autologous vein at the fourth stage. Postoperative angiography revealed patent stents and no residual stenoses. The choice in favor of these procedures and step-by-step approach has been substantiated. The authors emphasized effectiveness and safety of this treatment strategy.

Endovascular Reconstruction for Total Aorto–Iliac Occlusion

Objectives:

To analyze outcomes following endovascular treatment of total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation in a multicenter Italian registry.

Methods:

It is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. From January 2015 to December 2018, 1306 endovascular interventions for aorto–iliac occlusive disease were recorded in the vascular registry. For this analysis, only patients treated for total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation were included. Early (<30 days) primary outcomes of interest were technical success and mortality. Late major outcomes were primary and secondary patency and freedom from conversion to open aortic surgery.

Results:

A total of 54 (4.1%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Total percutaneous revascularization was possible in 41 (75.9%) patients and hybrid (endo plus open) intervention in 13 (24.1%) patients. The kissing-stent-graft technique was used in 45 (83.3%) cases, covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in 5 (9.2%), and a unibody endograft deployed in 4 (7.4%). Technical success was 98.1% (n = 53). There were no episodes of intraoperative or perioperative vessel rupture. Conversion to open surgery was not necessary, and there were no in-hospital deaths. The median patient follow-up time was 16 months (interquartrile range [IQR], 6-27). The estimated primary patency rate was 95.8% ± 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.5-98.9) at 1 year, 91.4% ± 0.05 (95% CI: 76.2-97.2) at 2 years, and 85 ± 0.08 (95% CI: 64.5-94.6) at 3 years. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.15-6.23, p = 0.963), extent of the occlusion (HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.05-1.46, p = 0.130), calcium score (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 0.31-11.27, p = 0.490), or type of endovascular reconstruction (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.13-5.15, p = 0.804) did not affect primary patency. Secondary patency was 95.5% ± 0.04 (95% CI: 78.4-99.2) at 3 years. No patients required late conversion to open surgical bypass.

Conclusions:

Endovascular reconstruction for total occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and aorto–iliac bifurcation was successful using a combination of percutaneous and hybrid revascularization techniques. Estimated patency rates at 3 years of follow-up are promising and are unaffected by the extent of occlusion or type of revascularization.

Treatment of Aortic and Iliac Artery Occlusion by Catheter Thrombolysis Combined with Catheter Thrombectomy and Aortic Bifurcation Endovascular Stent Reconstruction

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is an occlusive disease of the infrarenal aorta and iliac arteries usually caused by stenosis or occlusion at the end of the abdominal aorta-common iliac artery. Herein, we reported a case of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus- (TASC-) D AIOD with pale, cool, and intangible dorsalis pedis artery treated with catheter thrombolysis combined with catheter thrombectomy and aortic bifurcation endovascular stent reconstruction, which proved to be safe, effective, and minimally invasive approach. In the present paper, we discussed the physical and imaging manifestations, as well as treatments.

Catheter based interventions for lower extremity peripheral artery disease

The field of peripheral arterial intervention has exploded over the past 20 years. Current knowledge includes a growing evidence base for treatment as well as a myriad of new interventional approaches to complex disease. This review seeks to outline the current state of the art for interventional approaches to lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

Comparison of Aortobifemoral Bypass to Aortoiliac Stenting with Bifurcation Reconstruction for TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

OBJECTIVES

Long-segment stenting of the infrarenal aorta and bilateral iliac arteries, with or without femoral endarterectomy for diffuse disease, has been adopted for treatment of severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of this reconstruction, termed aortoiliac stenting with bifurcation reconstruction (AISBR), to aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) in patients with comparable TASC II D lesions.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients treated with ABF or AISBR for comparable TASC II D lesions between 2010 and 2018. ABF patients were included only if they were deemed anatomic candidates also for AISBR after review of preoperative imaging. Patients treated for acute limb ischemia and bypass graft infection were excluded. Statistics included Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There were 24 ABF and 75 AISBR included in the study. The primary indication for treatment was claudication in 55 (55.6%) patients, rest pain in 28 (28.3%), and tissue loss in 16 (16.2%). Patients undergoing AISBR were more likely to be female. Femoral endarterectomies were performed in 37/75 (49.3%) AISBR and 14/24 (58.3%) ABF (p=0.44). AISBR were performed percutaneously in 34/75 (45.1%). No AISBR required conversion to ABF. Intraoperative blood loss, procedure time and hospital length of stay (LOS) were significantly less for AISBR compared to ABF. Surgical site infections (SSI) were less common in patients undergoing AISBR (AISBR: 6/75 (8.0%) vs. ABF: 9/24 (37.5%), (p<0.01). One AISBR and two ABF developed late SSI >30 days postoperatively. The reductions in blood loss, LOS and SSI remained significant after excluding percutaneous AISBR from the analysis. Five-year primary patency was 50.8% (95% CI: 33.3, 68.4%) for AISBR and 88.1% (72.7, 100.0%) for ABF (p=0.04). Five-year survival was 76.5% (95% CI: 63.6, 89.5) for AISBR and 100% (95% CI: 100.0, 100.0) for ABF (p = 0.07). Five-year primary assisted patency, secondary patency, freedom from reintervention and major adverse limb events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AISBR is a viable option for management of TASC II D AIOD, with lower morbidity and acceptable durability when compared to traditional ABF.

Midterm outcomes of the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation for aortoiliac occlusive disease in a latinoamerican population

INTRODUCTION

Surgical approach of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AOD) with aorto-bi-femoral graft or endarterectomy, has been the first line treatment with patency rates up to 90%. Nevertheless, this procedure has an early mortality rate of 4%. Vascular complications of aorto-bi-femoral graft have an average incidence of 5-10% and development of incisional hernia in 10% of the cases. The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation or CERAB technique, as a new approach is shaping up to be a promising approach. However, there are few studies in Latin America and the Caribbean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study. All patients treated with the CERAB technique between February 2015 and June 2021 in three hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients (5 male and 4 female) were treated with the CERAB technique. Only one patient died. Of the total number of patients, 41.2% had a TASC II - C classification, and 58.8% had a TASC II - D classification. Complications included dissection in only 2 patients, massive bleeding in 1 patient and hematoma in 3 patients. The average number of days in critical care was 1.2 days and 2.6 in hospitalization. Two patients required endovascular reintervention. Primary patency was present in 66.7% of the patients.

DISCUSSION

The CERAB technique presents a low morbidity and mortality with an 88.9% of technical success rate. None of our patients needed Chimney CERAB procedure. Our results are similar to those reported in the literature, where they report primary patency rates between 82% and 97%.

[Hybrid operations in treatment of patients with multi-level lesions of lower limb arteries]

The article is a review of literature dedicated to simultaneous open and endovascular (hybrid) operations in treatment of patients with chronic ischaemia of lower limbs. Despite good results of endovascular interventions, in many situations involvement of arteries below the inguinal fold and multilevel lesions are arguments in favour of performing an open operation. On the other hand, open multilevel interventions are accompanied by an increased risk of complications and mortality. Hybrid interventions appear to be a safe and efficient alternative combining advantages of two methods of treatment and making it possible to achieve an optimal outcome with a minimal surgical wound. Also discussed herein are the problems of terminology, indications for, techniques and results of treatment, providing a historical background, followed by analysing problem spots of using this technique and trends of development.

Midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment with bare metal stents for Leriche syndrome patients

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to evaluate the acute and midterm results of endovascular treatment with bare metal stents (BMS) for Leriche syndrome patients.

METHODS

Patients with Leriche syndrome treated with BMS from August 2008 to May 2017 were included in the study and followed up. The primary endpoints were primary restenosis-free survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years. The secondary endpoints were secondary restenosis-free and freedom from target lesion revascularization survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years; technical success rate; complication rate; procedure-related mortality rate; and clinical status improvement at follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included and the follow-up duration was 34.7 ± 18.7 months (0-86 months). The 1-, 2- and 3-year primary restenosis-free survival rates were 94.4%, 88.1% and 73.5% and the secondary patency rates were 94.4%, 94.4% and 86.6%, respectively. The freedom from target lesion revascularization survival rates of patients at 1, 2 and 3 years were 94.4%, 88.1% and 79.3%, respectively. The aortoiliac lesions were successfully treated with BMS bilaterally in 17 patients (85.0%) and unilaterally in another 3 patients (15.0%). The complication rate was 10.0% and the procedure-related mortality rate was 0%. Mean ankle-brachial index increased significantly from 0.43 ± 0.20 before the procedure to 0.95 ± 0.21 after the procedure (P < 0.001), and to 1.00 ± 0.19 at the end of the follow-up (P < 0.001). Improvement in symptoms occurred in most patients soon after the endovascular procedure (95.0%) and at follow-up (88.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment with BMS is effective and safe for patients with Leriche syndrome according to 3-year follow-up results.

Long-Term Outcome for Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation for Aortoiliac Disease: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

The gold standard for the treatment of complex (TASC II C and D) atherosclerotic aortoiliac lesions is still open surgical repair. Endovascular techniques have a lower mortality and morbidity rate but this comes at the cost of worse patency rates when compared with open repair. Improved short- and mid-term results have been reported using the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with the CERAB technique and report long-term patency rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated with the CERAB technique between 2012 and 2018 were prospectively registered in an institutional database and included in this study. Patient demographics, characteristics, symptoms, procedural, and follow-up details were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative complications and reinterventions were also identified. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to assess cumulative rates of patency.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were treated with the CERAB technique and included in this study. The majority of the treated aortoiliac occlusions were classified as complex: TASC II C (n=7; 15.9%) or TASC II D (n=25; 56.8%). Primary patency rate at 60 months was 83.3%, assisted primary patency was 90.9% and secondary patency 95%. No significant differences were found in patency rates comparing noncomplex (TASC II A and B) and complex (TASC II C and D) aortoiliac lesions. Seven patients (15.9%) required at least one additional procedure to maintain either assisted primary patency or secondary patency during follow-up. The 30-day complication rate in this series was 20.5% (n=9), of which 55.6% (n=5) were minor complications. All major 30-day complications (n=4) occurred during or directly after the CERAB procedure. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. No limb occlusions occurred within 30 days of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Good long-term patency rates can be achieved with the CERAB technique to treat aortoiliac stenosis or occlusions while maintaining advantages associated with endovascular interventions. This remains true even when a CERAB is used to treat complex aortoiliac lesions. An endo-first approach to treat complex aortoiliac lesions seems viable.

Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease With the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique: Results of a UK Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

This UK multicenter study aims to report early- and medium-term results following covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) or intermittent claudication (IC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case analysis was performed of patients who underwent CERAB between November 1, 2012 and March 31, 2020 in 6 centers across the United Kingdom. Anatomical data, including degree of plaque calcification, were assessed using preoperative imaging. Outcome measures included mortality, perioperative complications, target lesion reintervention (TLR), and major limb amputation. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patencies were calculated at set intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients underwent CERAB over the study period for the following reasons [48% presenting with CLTI (Rutherford 4-6) and 52% with IC (Rutherford 1-3)]; 82% presented had Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D AIOD disease. Median age was 65 years (range 42-90 years); 76% of the cohort were male. Severely calcified aortic and iliac lesions were noted in 90% and 80% of patients, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 18 months (range 1-91 months), 2 (1.7%) patients were lost to follow up. In total 5, (4.3%) patients died and 2 (1.7%) had a major amputation. Endovascular TLR was required in 14 (12.1%) patients at last follow up. Surgical TLR was performed in 4 (3.4%) patients at last follow-up. Seven (6%) patients developed an aortic/iliac stent occlusion at last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) freedom from TLR at 1 year was 94% and KM 1-year primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 88%, 94%, and 98% respectively. Subanalysis found the following features were associated with need for TLR; TASC D disease (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.71), severe aortic calcification (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.20), and presence of tissue loss at baseline (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.63).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative (<30 days) and medium-term morbidity, mortality, and patency rates in this pragmatic cohort of patients with severe AIOD lesions show that CERAB is a valid revascularization option. A direct comparison with surgical treatments for AIOD in a randomized controlled trial is justified.

Two-year single centre results with covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) in the treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of a single-centre in the treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) by the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data obtained from the review of medical charts of all consecutive patients treated with CERAB technique for AIOD between January 2016 and December 2019 in San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital (Rome, Italy). Clinical examination, duplex ultrasound with ankle-brachial index measurement and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography were performed preoperatively. A clinical and ultrasound follow-up was carried out at one month and then half yearly after the intervention to evaluate patients' clinical status, limb salvage, target lesion revascularization rate, primary and secondary patency rate.

RESULTS

During the study period, 24 patients (14 men, 58.3%; 10 women, 41.7%; median age 59 years, range 37-79 years) underwent CERAB for AIOD (TASC II C 29.2%, TASC II D 70.8%). Indications for treatment were: intermittent claudication in 18 patients (75%) and critical limb ischemia in 6 (25%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative minor complications occurred in three cases (12.5%). One patient reported an intraoperative iliac rupture requiring adjunctive covered stenting. Median hospital length of stay was two days (range 1-9). No patient died perioperatively nor at the last follow-up. At a median follow-up of 18 months (range 6-48 months), mean ankle-brachial index increased significantly (from 0.62 ± 0.15 before the procedure to 0.84 ± 0.18) (P < 0.001) and target lesion revascularization rate was 12.5%. At two years, the limb salvage rate was 100%, and primary and secondary patency rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CERAB technique demonstrated to be effective at the mid-term follow-up with low rate of complications and short length of stay. Long-term results and more robust data are needed to affirm this technique as the first-line treatment for extensive AIOD. However, it could become the preferred option especially in fragile patients and during contemporary COVID-19 pandemic due to the current limitations in vascular and critical care bed capacity.

Covered Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has largely shifted to endovascular techniques, with primary stenting constituting the preferred treatment approach. The goal of the current study was to summarize available literature and to determine whether covered stents are superior to bare metal stents for the treatment of AIOD, in terms of both periprocedural and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 47 studies was conducted with the use of random effects modeling. The incidence of adverse events during follow up among the individual included studies was synthesized.

RESULTS

Most of the lesions were located at the common iliac arteries and were chronic total occlusions. The procedure was technically successful in almost all cases in both groups, with a low rate of periprocedural complications observed in both groups. The reported primary patency rates for the non-covered and covered stent group during an average follow up of 24.3 months among the individual studies, were 84% and 92% respectively, while surgical or endovascular re-intervention was required in 10% of non-covered stent cases and in 6% of covered stent cases. Eight studies comparing covered vs non-covered stents in terms of patency demonstrated superiority of covered stents (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.01-6.01; p = 0.047 Combining TASC C/D lesions together 12 studies reported 92% (95%CI:89%-95%) primary patency in the covered stent group, while 7 studies reported 75% (95%CI: 60%-88%) primary patency for cases treated with non-covered stents.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that covered stents are safe and effective when utilized for the treatment of AIOD. Covered stents were associated with a statistically significant higher odds of primary patency in both the overall cohort and in more complex TASC C/D lesions. However, additional high-quality comparative analyses between covered vs bare metal stents and between several types of covered stents are needed to determine the most optimal treatment modality for AIOD.

Management of Extensive Aorto-Iliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 9319 Patients

PURPOSE

Despite advances in endovascular management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) including covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) techniques, guidelines for management of symptomatic Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) type C/D lesions favour open surgical revascularisation. This meta-analysis investigates outcomes in patients with TASC II C/D lesions treated with open bypass procedures (OS), standard endovascular treatments (SEV) or CERAB.

METHODS

Multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database) were searched to identify studies reporting endovascular and open treatment of extensive AIOD. Studies were independently assessed. Outcomes reported included 30-day morbidity/mortality and patency rates.

RESULTS

A total of 9319 patients undergoing intervention for extensive AIOD were identified from 66 studies. Median patient age was 64 years (n = 3204) for SEV, 58 years (n = 240) for CERAB and 59 years for OS (n = 5875). Pooled meta-analysis for 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing SEV, CERAB and OS was 9, 10 and 15%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0.79, 0 and 3% in the SEV, CERAB and OS groups, respectively. In these groups, one-year primary and secondary patency was 90, 88, 96 and 96, 97, and 97% whilst three-year primary and secondary patency was 78, 82, 93 and 93, 97, 97% respectively. Five-year primary and secondary patency was 71 and 89% for SEV and 88 and 95% for OS, respectively. CERAB data were only available to 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that thirty-day morbidity and mortality favours endovascular techniques. Primary patency remains better with OS in both early and midterms;; however, secondary patency is comparable in all groups. These findings suggest that SEV/CERAB may be considered as an alternative to OS in higher-risk patients.

Outcomes of Unibody Bifurcated Endograft and Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Purpose

We compared the outcomes between the total endovascular approach using a unibody bifurcated aortoiliac endograft and the gold standard aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) surgery for the management of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

Methods

Materials and This retrospective observational study compared the outcomes of endovascular technique with unibody bifurcated endograft (UBE) using the Endologix AFX unibody stent-graft and a standard surgical approach (ABF) in the management of AIOD based on patient records in Western Vascular Institute, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland. Procedural details and outcomes were documented to compare both groups.

Results

From January 2002 to December 2018, 67 patients underwent AIOD (20 UBE and 47 ABF). Both the ABF and UBE groups showed 100% immediate clinical and technical successes without 30-day mortality. There were no statistical differences in the overall survival and sustained clinical improvement between the bypass and the UBE groups; however, statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year freedom from re-intervention and amputation-free survival. Furthermore, the mean length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly lower in the UBE group than that in the ABF group (0.75 days vs. 3.1 days, P=0.001).

Conclusion

Total endovascular reconstruction of AIOD is an alternative to invasive bypass procedures, with a shorter ICU stay.

Hybrid covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) procedure is preferable to aortobifemoral bypass for limb-threatening aortoiliac occlusive disease during the COVID-19 crisis

The COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting the provision of acute vascular surgery across the globe. Limited evidence of the impact of nosocomial infection on patient outcomes as well as concerns about critical care capacity will likely have an impact on surgical decision-making. Endovascular therapy offers a way by which perioperative risk can be reduced for vascular patients while also reducing the impact of acute surgery on intensive care unit capacity. This case report describes the management of a patient with complex aortoiliac occlusive disease by a hybrid endovascular approach in light of these constraints, with a successful outcome.

Effect of conservative treatment in aortoiliac occlusive disease

Objective: To determine the effect of primary conservative treatment without revascularization in patients with proven aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) presenting with intermittent claudication (IC).Background: The initial treatment of IC should focus on supervised exercise therapy (SET) and pharmacotherapy. Nowadays, primary endovascular revascularization (EVR) has become increasingly popular in patients with all types of AIOD. But in daily practice, EVR is often performed without initially extensive exercise.Method: This is a single centre retrospective study from December 2012 to September 2017. Primary outcomes were maximum walking distance (MWD) and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were revascularization rate and mortality.Results: Twenty-four patients were included. Mean age was 64 years (SD: 9). Mean follow-up was 28 months (SD: 17). Nineteen patients (80%) had SET. In 18 (75%) patients, the MWD was improved compared to the initial situation. In five (21%) patients, the MWD stayed the same. The MWD of one (4%) patient decreased. Overall satisfaction rate was 87%. Three patients (13%) were not satisfied with the conservative treatment and eventually got an EVR. There was no disease related death.Conclusions: Conservative treatment, especially with SET, has acceptable subjective symptom outcomes in selected patients with AIOD. It could be a good alternative treatment for certain patients with AIOD and IC.

The Comparison between Axillofemoral Bypass and Endovascular Treatment for Patients with Challenging Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease as Alternative Treatment to Aortofemoral Bypass

Objective: Although aortofemoral bypass (AoFB) is the standard treatment for challenging aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), less-invasive treatments, such as axillofemoral bypass (AxFB) or endovascular treatment (EVT) have been conducted for patients with severe comorbidities. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes between AxFB and EVT for AIOD. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 9 patients with AxFB and 10 with EVT for challenging AIOD. The patients' information and operative results were evaluated. The rates of patency and limb salvage were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the EVT group, 5 of 10 (50%) patients had aortic stenting alone, 3 (30%) received aorto-uniiliac stenting, and 2 (20%) received aorto-biiliac stenting. In the AxFB group, 2 cases (22.2%) showed acute graft thrombosis; however, in the EVT group, no acute thrombotic complications were seen. The primary patency rates in the AxFB and EVT groups at 5 years were 53.6% and 81.2%, respectively (log rank P=0.225), and the assisted primary patency rates at 5 years were 53.6% and 100%, respectively (log rank P=0.012). Conclusion: EVT exhibited a more durable, better long-term patency rate than AxFB. EVT may, therefore, be a viable treatment alternative to AoFB for challenging AIOD.

The Viabahn balloon expandable stent for endovascular reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta and its bifurcation in cases of severe obstructive disease

INTRODUCTION

The covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) represents a promising technique for the treatment obstructive lesions involving the aortic bifurcation. The aim of this report is to describe the use of a new generation balloon-expandable stent-graft (Viabahn VBX, W.L. Gore&Associates, AZ, USA), in the CERAB configuration for the treatment of aorto-iliac obstructive lesions involving the infrarenal aorta and bifurcation.Technical note: This technique was adopted in two patients with severe aorto-iliac obstructive lesions. After bilateral iliac recanalization, an 11 mm diameter VBX stent was deployed in the infrarenal aorta; a post-dilatation up to 16 mm with a non-compliant balloon was performed to adapt the proximal edge of the stent to the aortic diameter. Two 8 mm diameter VBX stents were then deployed at the aortic bifurcation in a kissing conformation, overlapping with the previously positioned aortic stent for 15 mm. A post-ballooning with two kissing 12 × 20 mm compliant balloons (Powerflex Pro PTA, Cordis, CA, USA) was performed to adapt the parallel stents to the aortic cuff. A post-operative angio-CT demonstrated optimal conformability of the aortic cuff to the aortic wall, and apposition of the kissing stents to the aortic cuff.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience shows that the VBX stent may allow an effective reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation; the conformability and flaring capability may allow to overcome the diameter mismatch between the aorta and the iliac arteries.

Comparative Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Limited to Common Iliac Arteries Who Underwent Endarterectomy versus Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compared outcomes of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), limited to the common iliac artery, who underwent either aortoiliac thromboendarterectomy (AIE) or aortobiiliac bypass grafting (ABIB).

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with AIOD who underwent either AIE or ABIB between 2010 and 2019 from a prospective database. Patients with disease extending to the external iliac or common femoral arteries were excluded. Data collected included demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, indication for surgery, preoperative and postoperative ankle brachial indexes (ABIs), estimated blood loss, major adverse events (MAEs), and long-term patency. The study end point was clinical success, defined as improvement in ABIs with resolution of symptoms. MAEs included return to the operating room for any reason, postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, or venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients, who met inclusion criteria, underwent repair for AIOD (AIE: 13; ABIB: 20) at our institution during this time. In both groups, there were more women than men (AIE: 11, ABIB: 10) with a mean age of 55 ± 7 years and 58 ± 6 years in the AIE and ABIB group, respectively. Indication for surgery included disabling claudication in 19 patients, ischemic rest pain in 13 patients, and tissue loss in one patient. No difference in cardiovascular risk factors or AIOD severity was noted between groups. Patients in the AIE group had slightly higher body mass index (30 ± 5 vs. 26 ± 6, P = 0.06). Two patients in each group required concomitant renal/mesenteric artery endarterectomy. One patient in the AIE group required bilateral femoral artery exposure and external iliac thrombectomy. MAEs (4 vs. 0) were higher in the ABIB group including, pneumonia in one patient, myocardial infarction in another, return to the operating room for evacuation of hematoma in the third and bypass graft thrombectomy with lower extremity angiography in the fourth patient. There were no differences in the intensive care unit or hospital length of stay between groups. Patients in both groups achieved return of normal ABI and complete resolution of their symptoms. At mean follow-up time of 43.4 ± 25.2 and 52.9 ± 35.4 months in the AIE and ABIB group, respectively, there was no symptomatic recurrence or need for reintervention while two patients in the ABIB group died of non-aortic-related issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures were safe, effective, and conferred high long-term primary patency with no need for reintervention in patients with AIOD limited to the common iliac arteries.

A systematic review of covered balloon-expandable stents for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare studies reporting the outcomes of the use of covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stents for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that investigated the use of CBE stents for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease and were published between 2000 and 2019. Baseline demographic data, procedural variables, and long-term outcomes were extracted from publications for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 published articles about 14 studies were included in the review. Of these, eight studies were prospective clinical trials and six studies were retrospective real-world studies. The articles included data regarding five different CBE stents, namely, the iCast/Advanta V12, Viabahn VBX, BeGraft, LifeStream, and JOSTENT. Lesion severity was higher in real-world studies, with more TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus Classification class D lesions and a higher percentage of occlusions. All studies showed high rates of technical success and patency over the course of 12 months. Long-term data were only available for the iCast/Advanta V12 device, which had a primary patency rate of 74.7% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CBE stents are a viable treatment option for patients with complex aortoiliac lesions because of their high rates of technical success and favorable patency across all devices at 12 months. However, long-term data are only available for a single device, the iCast/Advanta V12. The results of using this device were favorable over the course of 5 years.

Update on covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation

Objective

The covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique was introduced in 2009 in order to provide an anatomically and physiologically optimal endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation.

Method

In the current review, all available evidence on this technique was summarized.

Results

In vitro studies have shown a more favorable geometry of CERAB compared to kissing stents, leading to better local flow conditions. The results of CERAB are at least as good as those achieved with kissing stents in a more complex group of treated patients. The mid-term patency rates approach those of surgical reconstruction. Initial data show that the technique can also be used in combination with chimney grafts in order to preserve side branches.

Conclusion

CERAB has proven to be the most optimal endovascular treatment option for aorto-iliac occlusive disease with regard to geometry and flow and is related to promising clinical outcomes. Prospective and comparative trials are necessary to elucidate the most optimal treatment algorithm for patients with aorto-iliac occlusive disease.

[Aortic bifurcation reconstruction : Endovascular repair and alternatives]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Aortic bifurcation disease is a manifestation of arteriosclerosis in about 95% of cases. Stenotic disease of the aortic bifurcation is a special form of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Men older than 60 years are particularly affected.

STANDARD TREATMENT

The potential of endovascular therapy has continued to increase. Hereby, the increased availability of hybrid operating suites which allow for a combined use of endovascular techniques and open surgery plays an important role.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

For the decision on the type of therapy and the sizing of the prosthesis, thin-slice CT angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries including multiplanar reconstructions in the sagittal and coronal planes is sufficient. The inguinal arteries have to be included in the CTA volume.

PERFORMANCE

Compared to open surgery, endovascular therapy of aortic bifurcation disease has the advantage of reduced invasiveness.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Treatment of aortic bifurcation disease continues to change. In daily practice, the standard treatment of complex aortic bifurcation disease is still open surgery. However, an increasing number of studies indicate that endovascular therapy and open surgery should be considered equivalent, complementary methods.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Good quality preinterventional CTA is important for intervention planning. If you want to offer endovascular therapy as a radiologist, knowledge of interventional skills and close cooperation with clinical colleagues, particularly the vascular surgeon, is mandatory.

Combined Less-invasive Surgical and Endovascular Technique to Minimise Operative Trauma and Treat Excessive Aortoiliac Thrombotic Obliteration with Popliteo-crural Involvement and Acute Limb Ischaemia

This article demonstrates a less-invasive combined surgical and endovascular alternative approach in a case in which an excessive thrombotic formation in the infrarenal aorta caused occlusion of the iliac artery and the ipsilateral crural arteries. A 51-year-old man was admitted to the authors’ hospital with symptomatology of acute lower limb ischaemia. He had undergone endovascular treatment with placement of kissing stents in the common iliac arteries 2 years previously. A CT angiography scan revealed an extensive thrombus formation in the entire infrarenal aorta occluding the distal infrarenal aorta, the iliac artery and the crural arteries. He underwent a hybrid approach, with exposure of only the right common femoral artery and over-the-wire embolectomy of the infrarenal aorta and the iliac artery, and after the restoration of the inflow, an embolectomy of the peripheral vessels was carried out. To cover the residual aortic thrombus and to restore the severe in-stent restenosis of the previously deployed bare stents, three covered balloon-expandable stents were deployed in kissing technique. The patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day with palpable peripheral pulses. Combined surgical and endovascular techniques minimise the operative trauma and length of hospital stay for the patient, successfully restoring the perfusion in a physiological manner.

Open repair versus endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac lesions in low risk patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare open surgical repair (OSR) versus endovascular repair (ER) using self-expanding covered stents for complex TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) class C or D aortoiliac lesions in low-risk patients, with a specific subanalysis for younger patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of TASC C/D lesions treated from January 2008 to December 2017 was conducted. Patients with associated aortic aneurysm or lesions involving the entire infrarenal aorta were excluded. Thirty-day outcomes, long-term patency, limb salvage, and freedom from related reinterventions were compared between OSR and ER. "Low surgical risk" was defined as a Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score of ≤0.7 and age <75 years. Patients were considered "young" if aged ≤60 years. The follow-up results were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Major clinical and anatomic characteristics were evaluated for their association with patency using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Overall, 114 patients (OSR, n = 56; ER, n = 58) were treated, of whom, 70 patients (63%) had bilateral iliac disease involvement, for a total of 182 limbs revascularized (OSR, n = 96; ER, n = 86). Iliac lesions were classified by limb as TASC C (n = 71; 39%) or D (n = 111; 61%). Their mean age was 61.4 ± 8.4 years, and the mean Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score was 0.51 ± 0.39, without statistically significant differences between the OSR and ER groups (0.48 ± 0.29 vs 0.56 ± 0.47; P = .357). At 30 days, the ER group had had a shorter length of hospitalization (8.5 ± 6.2 vs 2.6 ± 0.8 days; P < .001) and intensive care unit stay (0.1 ± 0.6 vs 0.9 ± 0.5 day; P < .001) than the OSR group. The cumulative medical (OSR, 7%; ER, 5%; P = .714) and surgical (OSR, 10%; ER, 8%; P = .759) complication rates were similar. At 5 years, the primary patency rate was similar between the two groups (OSR, 87.3%; ER, 81.4%; P = .317). This result was confirmed in the subgroup of "young" patients (OSR, 84.7; ER, 75.0; P = .272). The limb salvage (OSR, 98.9%; ER, 98.4%; P = .920) and freedom from related reintervention (OSR, 74.4%; ER, 73.0%; P = .703) rates were similar. This trend was also confirmed in the "young" patients for both limb salvage (OSR, 98.5%; ER, 97.6%; P = .896) and freedom from related reintervention (OSR, 76.9%; ER, 63.6%; P = .223). Multivariate analysis indicated that the only independent negative predictor of patency was female gender in the ER group (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-26.60; P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of severe aortoiliac obstructive lesions in low-risk and young patients, ER using a covered stent can be considered as valid as OSR. In addition, it allows for shorter hospitalization and maintains a similar patency rate in the long term. However, for female patients, OSR remains the reference standard of treatment.

Aortic Stenting in Symptomatic Infrarenal Aortic Stenosis and Subtotal Aortic Occlusion

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of aortic stent placement in patients with infrarenal aortic occlusive disease.

Methods:

Between April 1996 and May 2014, 34 patients with symptomatic infrarenal atherosclerotic aortic stenosis or subtotal aortic occlusion underwent percutaneous angioplasty with primary aortic stent implantation. There were 21 patients with Fontaine stage of the peripheral arterial disease (PAD) II, 5 patients with stage III, and 8 patients with stage IV. One patient withdrew informed consent and was excluded from further analysis.

Results:

Patients (n = 34, mean age: 62 ± 12 years) were followed for a mean period of 81 months. There were 2 procedure-related access-related complications. Six patients died during follow-up from non-procedure-related causes. Eight patients had late recurrence of symptoms during follow-up. Only in 2 cases, symptomatic recurrences were due to aortic in-stent stenosis (77 and 132 months after the primary stent implantation). Additionally, these 2 patients required therapy for PAD progression distal to the aorta. Five patients required further surgical or endovascular reconstruction for PAD progression distal to the aorta. In another case, clinical treatment failure was due to the progression of atherosclerotic lesion in the perirenal, nonstented part of the abdominal aorta. The mean estimated primary patency rate was 185.6 months (95% confidence interval: 161.3-209.8).

Conclusion:

Endovascular stent implantation is a safe and long-term effective strategy for the treatment of infrarenal aortic occlusive disease. In our study, the recurrence of symptoms was observed mainly due to atherosclerosis progression by multilevel disease with associated infrainguinal occlusive lesions but not to aortic in-stent restenosis. The prognostic advantage for this relatively young cohort of patients can be the possibility to repeat a percutaneous procedure with less technical difficulties when compared to surgical revision.

Lower extremity arterial disease in patients with diabetes: a contemporary narrative review

Lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a major endemic disease with an alarming increased prevalence worldwide. It is a common and severe condition with excess risk of major cardiovascular events and death. It also leads to a high rate of lower-limb adverse events and non-traumatic amputation. The American Diabetes Association recommends a widespread medical history and clinical examination to screen for LEAD. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is the first non-invasive tool recommended to diagnose LEAD although its variable performance in patients with diabetes. The performance of ABI is particularly affected by the presence of peripheral neuropathy, medial arterial calcification, and incompressible arteries. There is no strong evidence today to support an alternative test for LEAD diagnosis in these conditions. The management of LEAD requires a strict control of cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia. The benefit of intensive versus standard glucose control on the risk of LEAD has not been clearly established. Antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet agents are obviously worthfull to reduce major cardiovascular adverse events, but few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the benefits of these treatments in terms of LEAD and its related adverse events. Smoking cessation, physical activity, supervised walking rehabilitation and healthy diet are also crucial in LEAD management. Several advances have been achieved in endovascular and surgical revascularization procedures, with obvious improvement in LEAD management. The revascularization strategy should take into account several factors including anatomical localizations of lesions, medical history of each patients and operator experience. Further studies, especially RCTs, are needed to evaluate the interest of different therapeutic strategies on the occurrence and progression of LEAD and its related adverse events in patients with diabetes.

Endovascular and Hybrid Revascularization for Complicated Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease: Short-Term Results in Single Institute Experience

Background

Treatment for extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) includes endovascular interventions, hybrid procedures and surgical reconstruction. This study evaluated the short-term outcomes of endovascular and hybrid procedures in patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC-II) D AIOD lesions.

Materials and Methods

From January 2013 to June 2015, 41 patients with TASC-II D AIOD lesions who underwent revascularization at our institute were retrospectively included. Nineteen underwent endovascular procedures and 22 underwent hybrid procedures with a postoperative surveillance program for at least 1 year. Patient demographics and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The procedural success rate in all patients was 100%. The accumulative postoperative complication rate was 20.2%, and the major complication was acute kidney injury (14.6%). The time of freedom from target lesion revascularization was 18.9 months. The primary patency rates in the endovascular group were 89.5% and 84.2% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, compared to 95.5% at 1 and 2 years in the hybrid group; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.234). The secondary patency rates were 94.7% and 93% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the endovascular group, and 95.5% and 94% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in the hybrid group; however, the differences was not significant (p = 0.916).

Conclusions

Our study revealed that endovascular and hybrid procedures are favorable treatment choices for patients with TASC-II D AIOD lesions. In patients with multilevel steno-occlusive lesions, hybrid procedures improved distal runoff flow and reduced the complexity of endovascular procedures.