Editor's Choice - Five Year Results of Great Saphenous Vein Treatment: A Meta-analysis

Interventions for great saphenous vein insufficiency: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Great saphenous vein insufficiency (GSVI) adversely affects the quality of life of affected individuals. Minimally invasive endo-venous ablation techniques have emerged as effective and safe treatments, despite the longstanding use of surgical interventions. We aim in our study to evaluate all the available interventions in the literature, either endo-venous or conventional approaches for the treatment of GSVI.

METHODS

A thorough search was performed across four electronic databases to identify relevant studies. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NWM) was executed on the combined data to derive network estimates pertaining to the outcomes of concern. Risk ratios (RRs) were employed as the effect size metric for binary outcomes, while mean differences (MDs) were utilized for continuous outcomes, each reported with a 95% confidence interval. The qualitative review was conducted employing the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 1.

RESULTS

Our NWM included 75 studies encompassing 12,196 patients. Regarding technical success rate within the first 5 years after treatment, Endo-venous Laser Ablation (EVLA) with High Ligation and Stripping (HL/S), EVLA alone, Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Injection, cryostripping, HL/S and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) were significantly better than Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy and F-care. Also, invagination stripping was inferior to all interventions. Conservative Hemodynamic Cure for Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins (CHIVA) demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate with a RR of 0.35 [0.15; 0.79] compared to RFA, but RFA was more effective in recurrence prevention than HL/S and Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA), with a RR of 0.63 [0.41; 0.97] and 0.18 [0.03; 0.95], respectively. Endo-venous Steam Ablation (EVSA) emerged as the most effective in reducing post-intervention pain, showing a MD of -2.73 [-3.72; -1.74] compared to HL/S. In Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire outcome, our analysis favored MOCA over most studied interventions, with an MD of -6.88 [-12.43; -1.32] compared to HL/S. Safety outcomes did not significantly differ among interventions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed significant variations in the technical success rates, recurrence rates, and post-intervention pain levels among different interventions. CHIVA exhibited enhanced performance in terms of lower recurrence rates, while EVSA emerged as a promising choice for mitigating post-intervention pain. Additionally, our analysis underscored the significance of patient-reported outcomes, with MOCA consistently yielding favorable results in terms of enhancing quality of life and expediting the return to regular activities.

Challenging conventions: Reconsidering the indication for endovenous ablation in CEAP 2 patients

INTRODUCTION

Endovenous ablation may not always be necessary for every patient with chronic venous insufficiency who has an indication for endovenous ablation. This study investigates whether compression stockings and Daflon® can be as effective for some patients with CEAP two in chronic venous insufficiency.

METHODS

In this study, 137 patients who had endovenous ablation indication received plethysmographical hemodynamic tests and were divided into two groups. Group 1 had normal venous hemodynamics and received compression stockings and Daflon®. Group 2 had abnormal function and received laser ablation. All patients were reevaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

The study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in the 6th month measurements after the treatments.

CONCLUSION

As a result, we do not find it appropriate and do not recommend that every patient with complaints of chronic venous insufficiency and an indication for endovenous ablation undergo ablation without evaluating lower extremity venous hemodynamics.

[Varicosis-Current treatment concepts]

Varicosis is a chronic progressive disease characterized by varicose veins of the lower extremities. Pain, swelling and heaviness of the legs are typical symptoms. These symptoms are caused by a pathological venous reflux, arising from a weakness of the vein wall and progressive venous insufficiency. The indications for invasive surgery are the symptomatic clinical, etiological, anatomical, pathophysiological (CEAP) stages C2s-C6. Compression therapy and venoactive drugs can be recommended for conservative therapy. When it comes to surgical treatment conventional open vein surgery is associated with the best long-term results. Endovenous thermal ablation is associated with few postoperative complications and favors earlier mobilization of the patient. Sclerotherapy has become established with good clinical results for the ablation of reticular and telangiectatic veins, for recurrences and complicated vein anatomy.

Comparative effectiveness of non-compounded polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam (Varithena) ablation versus endovenous thermal ablation utilizing a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effectiveness and safety of polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam ablation vs endovenous thermal ablation with radiofrequency or laser energy for treatment of venous insufficiency caused by lower extremity truncal vein incompetence via network meta-analysis of published comparative evidence.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review following best practices, including a prospective protocol. We screened studies published in English from 2000 to 2023 for randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting direct or indirect comparisons between polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam and endovenous thermal ablation. Thirteen studies met our eligibility criteria for the network meta-analysis. The co-primary effectiveness outcomes were the closure rate ≥3 months after procedure and the average change in the Venous Clinical Severity Score. For the subgroup of venous ulcer patients, the ulcer healing rate was the primary effectiveness outcome. The secondary outcomes included safety and patient-reported outcomes. Network meta-analyses were conducted on outcomes having sufficient data. Categorical outcomes were summarized using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity tests and estimates of network inconsistency were used to investigate the robustness of our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We found that polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam was not significantly different statistically from endovenous thermal ablation for venous closure (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.36-1.18; P = .16). Although not the primary aim of the study, the network meta-analysis also provided evidence to confirm our supposition that polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam was significantly differentiated statistically from physician-compounded foam, with higher odds for vein closure (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.58-5.37; P < .01). A sensitivity analysis using the longest available time point for closure in each study, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (median, 48 months; range, 12-72 months), showed results similar to those of the main analysis. No association was found between the risk of deep vein thrombosis and the treatment received. The available data were insufficient for a network meta-analysis of Venous Clinical Severity Score improvement and ulcer healing rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam was not significantly different statistically from endovenous thermal ablation for venous closure and deep vein thrombosis risk for chronic venous insufficiency treatment, based on a network meta-analysis of published evidence. Polidocanol 1% endovenous microfoam was significantly differentiated statistically from physician-compounded foam, with higher odds of vein closure. A sensitivity analysis found venous closure findings were robust at follow-up intervals of 12 months or greater and for up to 6 years. New evidence meeting the inclusion criteria for this review will be incorporated at regular intervals into a living network meta-analysis.

Increased body mass index and vein diameter are associated with incomplete target vein closure following microfoam ablation of incompetent saphenous veins

OBJECTIVE

Patient characteristics and risk factors for incomplete or non-closure following thermal saphenous vein ablation have been reported. However, similar findings have not been clearly described following commercially manufactured polidocanol microfoam ablation (MFA). The objective of our study is to identify predictive factors and outcomes associated with non-closure following MFA of symptomatic, refluxing saphenous veins.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained patient database was performed from procedures in our Ambulatory Procedure Unit. All consecutive patients who underwent MFA with commercially manufactured 1% polidocanol microfoam for symptomatic superficial vein reflux between June 2018 and September 2022 were identified. Patients treated for tributary veins only, without truncal vein ablation, were excluded. Patients were then stratified into groups: complete closure (Group I) and non-closure (Group II). Preoperative demographics, procedural details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Preoperative variables that were significant on univariate analysis (prior deep venous thrombosis [DVT], body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2, and vein diameter) were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model with the primary outcome being vein non-closure.

RESULTS

Between June 2018 and September 2022, a total of 224 limbs underwent MFA in our ambulatory venous center. Of these, 127 limbs in 103 patients met study inclusion criteria. Truncal veins treated included the above-knee great saphenous vein (Group I: n = 89, 77% vs Group II: n = 7, 58%; P = .14), below-knee great saphenous vein (Group I: n = 7, 6% vs Group II: n = 0; P = .38), anterior accessory saphenous vein (Group I: n = 17, 15% vs Group II: n = 4, 33%; P = .12, and small saphenous vein (Group I: n = 4, 4% vs Group II: n = 1, 8%; P = .41). Complete closure (Group I) occurred in 115 limbs, and 12 limbs did not close (Group II) based on postoperative duplex ultrasound screening. The mean BMI in Group II (36.1 ± 6.4 kg/m2) was significantly greater than Group I (28.6 ± 6.1 kg/m2) (P < .001). Vein diameter of ≥10.2 mm was independently associated with truncal vein non-closure with an odds ratio of 4.8. The overall mean foam volume was 6.2 ± 2.7 ml and not different between the two cohorts (Group I: 6.2 ± 2.6 ml vs Group II: 6.3 + 3.5 ml; P = .89). Post MFA improvement in symptoms was higher in Group I (96.9%) compared with Group II (66.7%) (P = .001). The mean postoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score was also lower in Group I (8.0 ± 3.0) compared with Group II (9.9 ± 4.2) (P = .048). The overall incidences of ablation-related thrombus extension and DVT were 4.7% (n = 6) and 1.6% (n = 2), and all occurred in Group I. All were asymptomatic and resolved with anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Microfoam ablation of symptomatic, refluxing truncal veins results in excellent overall closure rates and symptomatic relief. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and increased vein diameter are associated with an increased risk of saphenous vein non-closure following MFA. Non-closure is associated with less symptomatic improvement and a lower post-procedure reduction in Venous Clinical Severity Score. Despite the incidence of ablation-related thrombus extension and DVT in this study being higher than reported rates following thermal ablation, MFA is safe for patients with early postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance and selective short-term anticoagulation.

Factors influencing recurrent varicose vein formation after radiofrequency thermal ablation for truncal reflux performed in two high-volume venous centers

OBJECTIVE

Recanalization of the saphenous vein trunk after endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is often associated with recurrent varicose veins (RVVs) or recanalization. This study aimed to assess the long-term results of RFA of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and identify the risk factors for GSV recanalization and RVVs during follow-up for patients presenting to dedicated outpatient vein centers.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with incompetent GSVs who underwent RFA between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary study end points were freedom from GSV recanalization and the RVV rate during follow-up. The secondary study end points were the postoperative complication rate and the risk factors for GSV recanalization and RVVs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors for GSV recanalization and RVVs.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1568 limbs were treated in 1300 consecutive patients (mean age, 53.5 ± 12.9 years; 71.9% women; CEAP [clinical, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology] C2-C6; venous clinical severity score >5). Technical success was achieved in 99.7% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 57.2 ± 25.4 months, the GSV occlusion and freedom from reintervention rates were 100% and 100% within 1 week, 97% and 95.7% at 1 year, 95.2% and 93.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% and 92.8% at 5 years, respectively. The recurrence rate was 10% (n = 158) during the follow-up period. On multivariate analysis, a direct confluence of the accessory saphenous vein into the saphenofemoral junction (odds ratio [OR], 1.561; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-7.04; P = .032), a history of pregnancy >2 (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.19-11.36; P = .023), C4 (OR, 6.41; 95% CI, 1.36-30.28; P = .019), and preoperative GSV diameter >10 mm (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.65-4.03; P = .043) were risk factors for GSV recanalization. Moreover, age >70 years (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .014) and incompetent perforator veins (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.65-2.03; P = .018) were also risk factors for RVVs.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is a safe technique to ablate the GSV with a low complication rate and durability during 5 years of follow-up. However, patients with a high clinical score and those with direct confluence of the accessory saphenous vein into the saphenofemoral junction experienced higher long-term GSV recanalization and RVV rates.

Surgical Treatment of Persistent Glue Extension Into Common Femoral Vein Following Endovenous Glue Ablation

Endovenous glue-induced thrombosis (EGIT) is a known complication of endovenous ablation therapy using cyanoacrylate closure glue to treat saphenous insufficiency, where glue extends into the common femoral vein (CFV), causing partial or complete occlusion. We report a case of class III EGIT (over 50% occlusion of CFV) in a young, healthy female who could not tolerate medical therapy. EGIT was treated with high ligation of the great saphenous vein and CFV patch repair. This is a safe option for patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulation therapy due to complications, physical or psychological limitations, or both.

Brazilian guidelines on chronic venous disease of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery

The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery has set up a committee to provide new evidence-based recommendations for patient care associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Topics were divided in five groups: 1. Classification, 2. Diagnosis, 3. Conservative or non-invasive treatment, 4. Invasive treatment and 5. Treatment of small vessels. This last series is closely related to the activities of Brazilian angiologists and vascular surgeons, who are heavily involved in the treatment of small superficial veins. These guidelines are intended to assist in clinical decision-making for attending physicians and health managers. The decision to follow a guideline recommendation should be made by the responsible physician on a case-by-case basis taking into account the patient's specific condition, as well as local resources, regulations, laws, and clinical practice recommendations.

Evaluation of Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Management of Varicose Veins

Background The treatment of varicose veins has undergone tremendous changes over the years. High ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) have been considered standard treatments for GSV insufficiency for over a century and are still adopted as the preferred method in the majority of surgical centers in North Africa. However, the increase in minimally invasive treatments such as endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and cryo-stripping has produced excellent results. Most patients who underwent these minimally invasive treatments were satisfied with their outcomes. Methodology and results In this clinical and prospective study, 30 cases (19 male and 11 female) of primary varicose veins underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and their outcomes were reviewed, and their results were satisfying to the patients. After EVLA with or without sclerotherapy, no major complications occurred (recurrence or recanalization) at the time of the study, although minor complications were quite common and included bruising or ecchymosis, postoperative pain that required analgesics, superficial thrombophlebitis, and skin burns that were very responsive to medical treatment. Conclusion Endovenous laser ablation continues to be a valid minimally invasive method for treating varicose veins with minimal complications and a very short recovery period, which appeals to patients.

A randomized clinical trial of isolated ambulatory phlebectomy versus saphenous thermal ablation with concomitant phlebectomy (SAPTAP Trial)

BACKGROUND

Current treatment of patients with saphenous trunk and tributary incompetence consists of truncal ablation with concomitant, delayed or no treatment of the tributary. However, reflux of the saphenous trunk may be reversible after treatment of the incompetent tributary. The aim of this study was to determine whether single ambulatory phlebectomy with or without delayed endovenous truncal ablation (SAP) is non-inferior to thermal endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebectomy (TAP), and whether SAP is a cost-effective alternative to TAP.

METHODS

A multicentre, non-inferiority RCT was conducted in patients with an incompetent great saphenous vein or anterior accessory saphenous vein with one or more incompetent tributaries. Participants were randomized to receive SAP or TAP. After 9 months, additional truncal treatment was considered for SAP patients with remaining symptoms. The primary outcome was VEnous INsufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym score) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes were, among others, cost-effectiveness, perceived improvement of symptoms, and anatomical success.

RESULTS

Some 464 patients received the allocated treatment (SAP 227, TAP 237). VEINES-QOL scores were 52.7 (95 per cent c.i. 51.9 to 53.9) for SAP and 53.8 (53.3 to 55.1) for TAP; VEINES-Sym scores were 53.5 (52.6 to 54.4) and 54.2 (54.0 to 55.6) respectively. Fifty-eight patients (25.6 per cent) in the SAP group received additional truncal ablation. Treatment with SAP was less costly than treatment with TAP.

CONCLUSION

One year after treatment, participants who underwent SAP had non-inferior health-related quality of life compared with those who had TAP. Treatment with SAP was a cost-effective alternative to TAP at 12 months.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR 4821 (www.trialregister.nl).

Risk factors for short and long-term great saphenous vein recanalization in patients treated with endovenous radiofrequency ablation

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective single-center study is to describe and analyze short-, mid-, and long-term risk factors for great saphenous vein (GSV) recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients with GSV incompetence and varicose veins underwent RFA were enrolled between 2009 and 2018. Data on demographic, pre- and postoperative color Doppler scan (CDUS) findings, perioperative complications, and follow-up were prospectively collected. Primary outcome was GSV recanalization rate at 1 week after RFA. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complication rate, as well as GSV recanalization rate at 1, 3, and 5 years after RFA. Risk factors for recanalization were also analyzed, for each follow-up assessment, identifying differences in recanalized (Rec) and non-recanalized (nRec) groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1297 patients were treated. Among these, 1265 had at least 1 week of follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 3.0 ± 1.9 years. Recanalization rate at 1 week, 1, 3, and 5 years was 2.4%, 4.3%, 9.3%, and 17.5%, respectively. After multivariate analysis for each follow-up evaluation, CEAP classes C4 and 5, as well as preoperative GSV diameter >6 mm and history of smoking were found to be independent predictors of recanalization. Furthermore, age >61 years and postoperative complications such as pigmentation, edema, and paresthesia were found to be dependent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

RFA remains a safe and durable technique to ablate incompetent GSV. Despite this, particular attention should be paid to patients with high CEAP classes to avoid short and long-term recanalization.

Outcome Measures of In-Office Endovenous Radiofrequency Treatment of Varicose Vein Feasibility

RFA is a relatively new treatment, approved by the FDA in 1999 and is a minimally invasive intervention that has become one of the most common alternatives due to its many advantages, including decreased pain, less morbidity, shorter hospital stay and faster return to work. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 503 limbs submitted for surgical interventions for VVs using the RFA, combined or not with surgical phlebectomies and sclerotherapy, in our institution between April 2012 and December 2020. The technical success was 99.8%, as in one case the RFA catheter arrested at the first third of the thigh due to the tortuosity of the vessel. On the first post-operative day, the mean VAS scale was 0.32 ± 0.56 (0-2). Perioperative complications occurred in 77 cases (15.3%): intraoperative pain in 24 cases, in nine cases associated with vagal syndrome, superficial hematoma in 30 cases, EHIT in seven cases, phlebitis in 14 cases and paresthesia in two cases. RFA procedures had been shown to be cost-effective therapeutic options in adult patients requiring treatment due to the incompetence of the GSV. In our study, we highlighted that this technique is feasible as an ambulatory procedure; it improves quality of life and symptoms in the majority of patients with varicose veins, with a rapid return to normal life and work activities.

Direct oral anticoagulant agents might be safe for patients undergoing endovenous radiofrequency and laser ablation

OBJECTIVE

Studies assessing the effect of the use of anticoagulant agents on endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) have been limited to patients taking warfarin. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ETA for patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We hypothesized that the outcome of ETA for patients taking DOACs would not be superior to the outcomes for patients taking DOACs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation with 1470-nm diode laser fibers for symptomatic great or small saphenous venous reflux from 2018 to 2020. The patients were dichotomized into those who had received a therapeutic dose of DOACs periprocedurally and those who had not (control group). The outcomes of interest included the rates of treated vein closure at 7 days and 9 months and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), and bleeding periprocedurally.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients (382 procedures), 69 patients (87 procedures) had received DOACs and 232 control patients (295 procedures) had not received DOACs. The patients receiving DOACs were more often older (mean age, 65 years vs 55 years; P < .001) and male (70% vs 37%; P < .001), with a higher prevalence of venous thromboembolism and more severe CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification (5 or 6), than were the control patients. Those receiving DOACs were more likely to have had a history of DVT (44% vs 6%; P < .001), pulmonary embolism (13% vs 0%; P < .001), and phlebitis (32% vs 15%; P < .001). Procedurally, radiofrequency ablation had been used more frequently in the control group (92% vs 84%; P = .029), with longer segments of treated veins (mean, 38 mm vs 35 mm, respectively; P = .028). No major or minor bleeding events nor any EHIT had occurred in either group. Two patients in the control group (0.7%) developed DVT; however, no DVT was observed in those in the DOAC group (P = .441). At 9 months, the treated vein had remained ablated after 94.4% of procedures for patients receiving DOACs and 98.4% of the control group (P = .163). On multivariable analysis, DOAC usage was not associated with an increased risk of vein recanalization (hazard ratio, 5.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-58.64; P = .139). An increased preprocedural vein diameter and the use of endovenous laser ablation were associated with an increased risk of recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study of patients who had undergone ETA for symptomatic saphenous venous reflux, the periprocedural use of DOACs did not adversely affect the efficacy of endovenous ablation to ≥9 months. Furthermore, DOAC use did not confer an additional risk of bleeding, DVT, or EHIT periprocedurally. DOACs may be safely continued without affecting the efficacy and durability of ETA.

Ten-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The long-term results of saphenofemoral ligation and stripping (SFL/S) were compared with 980-nm bare fiber endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, controlled trial with a follow-up time of 10 years. Patients with GSV incompetence were randomized to undergo SFL/S or EVLA under tumescent anesthesia. The primary outcome was recurrence of groin-related varicose veins seen on duplex ultrasound imaging and clinical examination. The secondary outcomes were (changes or improvement in) CEAP clinical class, venous symptoms, cosmetic results, quality of life, reinterventions, and complications.

RESULTS

Between June 2007 and December 2008, 122 patients (130 limbs) were included; of these, 68 limbs were treated with SFL/S and 62 limbs with EVLA. The 10-year estimated freedom from groin recurrence as seen on duplex ultrasound imaging was higher in the SFL/S group (73% vs 44% in the EVLA group; P = .002), and the same trend was seen for clinically evident recurrence (77% vs 58%, respectively; P = .034). Nine reinterventions (17%) were deemed necessary in the SFL/S group vs 18 (36%) in the EVLA group (P = .059). All reinterventions in the SFL/S group consisted of foam sclerotherapy. Reinterventions in the EVLA group included foam sclerotherapy (n = 5), crossectomy (n = 2), and endovenous procedures (n = 11). There was no significant differences in quality of life and relief of venous symptoms. Cosmetic appearance improved, with a better cosmetic rating in the SFL/S group compared with the EVLA group (P = .026). One patient in the SFL/S group had a persisting neurosensory deficit remaining at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no clear long-term advantage of EVLA with a 980-nm wavelength and bare-tip fiber over high ligation and stripping of the GSV under local tumescent anesthesia.

Current Best Practice in the Management of Varicose Veins

This article outlines the current best practice in the management of varicose veins. “Varicose veins” traditionally means bulging veins, usually seen on the legs, when standing. It is now a general term used to describe these bulging veins, and also underlying incompetent veins that reflux and cause the surface varicose veins. Importantly, “varicose veins” is often used for superficial venous reflux even in the absence of visible bulging veins. These can be simply called “hidden varicose veins”. Varicose veins usually deteriorate, progressing to discomfort, swollen ankles, skin damage, leg ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis and venous bleeds. Patients with varicose veins and symptoms or signs have a significant advantage in having treatment over conservative treatment with compression stockings or venotropic drugs. Small varicose veins or telangiectasia without symptoms or signs can be treated for cosmetic reasons. However, most have underlying venous reflux from saphenous, perforator or local “feeding veins” and so investigation with venous duplex should be mandatory before treatment. Best practice for investigating leg varicose veins is venous duplex ultrasound in the erect position, performed by a specialist trained in ultrasonography optimally not the doctor who performs the treatment. Pelvic vein reflux is best investigated with transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVS), performed using the Holdstock-Harrison protocol. In men or women unable to have TVS, venography or cross-sectional imaging is needed. Best practice for treating truncal vein incompetence is endovenous thermal ablation. Increasing evidence suggests that significant incompetent perforating veins should be found and treated by thermal ablation using the transluminal occlusion of perforator (TRLOP) approach, and that incompetent pelvic veins refluxing into symptomatic varicose veins in the genital region or leg should be treated by coil embolisation. Bulging varicosities should be treated by phlebectomy at the time of truncal vein ablation. Monitoring and reporting outcomes is essential for doctors and patients; hence, participation in a venous registry should probably be mandatory.

Treatment of Recurrent Symptomatic Saphenous Trunk Reflux with Catheter Directed Foam Sclerotherapy and Tumescent Anaesthesia

Objective

The aim was to assess short and midterm efficacy and safety of catheter directed foam sclerotherapy (CDFS) with tumescent anaesthesia in patients with recurrent symptomatic saphenous reflux.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study (February 2018 to February 2019) including 21 consecutive patients referred with recurrent symptomatic varicose veins. Standing duplex ultrasound (DUS) with saphenous vein diameter measurement 3 cm from the terminal valve was performed pre-operatively. All the patients were operated on under local anaesthesia. By ultrasound guided puncture a hydrophilic 0.035″ guidewire and 5F Berenstein catheter were inserted through a 5F introducer sheath. Peri-saphenous tumescent anaesthesia (PSTA) was performed under ultrasound guidance. Sclerosant foam was prepared with sodium tetradecyl sulphate 3% or polidocanol 3% using the Tessari method. Concomitant phlebectomies were performed in 52%. Clinical evaluation and DUS were performed pre- and post-operatively at one week, six months, and 12 months.

Results

There were 11 men and 10 women (median age 52 years; interquartile range [IQR] 43 – 61). The great saphenous vein was treated in 18 patients. The median vein diameter was 6.8 mm (IQR 4.7 – 8.9). Previous procedures were Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire (CHIVA), mechanochemical ablation, thermal ablation, and cyanoacrylate closure. The distribution of the clinical class (Clinical Etiology Anatomy Pathophysiology [CEAP] classification) was 16 C2, three C3, and two C4 limbs. Immediate technical success was 100%. There were no complications in the early post-operative period. The median follow up was eight months (IQR 5 – 10). The occlusion rate demonstrated by DUS was 100% (21/21) at one week, 100% (21/21) at six months, and 86% (18/21) at 12 months. The median post-procedural vein diameter at one week, six months, and 12 months was 4.8 mm (IQR 3.9 – 6), 4.3 mm (IQR 3.5 – 5.5), and 4 mm (IQR 3 – 4.9), respectively.

Conclusion

Combination CDFS with PSTA achieves good short and medium term venous occlusion rates, associated with few complications in patients with recurrent symptomatic saphenous reflux.

•

The objective was to assess short and midterm efficacy and safety of catheter directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescent anaesthesia in patients with recurrent symptomatic saphenous trunk reflux.

•

Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy is the endovenous modality with the highest recanalisation rate compared with other techniques when treating patients with primary superficial venous reflux. Although the combination of catheter directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescent perivenous anaesthesia is a more complex procedure, this modification can increase the probability of success in terms of vein occlusion for patients with recurrent symptomatic saphenous reflux.

•

An occlusion rate 86% at 12 months is reported, but the “reflux free” ratio accounts for 95%. No relevant complications occurred in the early post-operative period. Patients did not report any neurological, pulmonary, or cardiac symptoms intra-operatively, or in the following hours or days.

Treatment of chronic venous disorder: A comprehensive review

Chronic venous disorder (CVD) is highly prevalent vascular disorder affecting up to 45% of the general population, with clinical manifestations ranging from teleangiectasias to venous leg ulcers (VLUs). We examined the currently available data in order to provide an updated, comprehensive review on treatment options of CVD. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials, and OpenGrey databases for relevant articles in English published until November 2020. Compression treatment is the mainstay of conservative treatment. Pharmacological treatment can provide significant symptomatic relief and hence it should be considered as part of conservative treatment. Transcutaneous Lacer treatment (TCL) is a safe and effective alternative option to sclerotherapy for treatment of C1 stage. High ligation and stripping (HL/S), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) systems and non thermal non tumescent ablation (NTNT) systems are safe and efficacious first-line options for treatment of saphenous insufficiency. Interventional treatment of co-existing incompetent perforator veins (IPVs) is not supported by contemporary evidence. Regarding deep venous insufficiency (DVI), treatment of symptomatic femoroiliocaval occlusive venous disease refractory to conservative treatment with percutaneous transluminal venoplasty stenting has produced encouraging results.

Current strategies for endovascular management of varicose veins: An updated review of superficial ablation technologies

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) which causes varicose veins and venous ulcers, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the general population. The last several years have witnessed many revolutionary developments in the realms of minimally invasive techniques (both thermal and non-thermal) to treat CVI. Moreover, multiple newer societal recommendations have been published over the past one year on the basis of the current evidence. In this article, we will briefly summarise the imaging for varicose veins and review the existing evidence in literature as well as the current guidelines and recommendations for the management of varicose veins, especially focusing on the various superficial ablation technologies.

Ultrasound-assisted varicose vein surgery and endovenous laser ablation using 1470-nm laser for treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence has similar outcomes at 1 year: A single-center prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Technical errors are the most common preventable cause of recurrence after high ligation and stripping procedures for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Ultrasound-assisted varicose vein surgery (UAVS) uses intraoperative ultrasound during high ligation and stripping to minimize such failures, although no data have been reported regarding its use during open surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of UAVS and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with a 1470-nm laser.

METHODS

The present prospective randomized study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2019. We compared 40 patients who had undergone UAVS under regional anesthesia with an equal number of patients who had undergone EVLA under tumescent anesthesia. Both groups received 1 week of standardized postoperative analgesia. The improvements in the pain score, venous clinical severity score, and recurrence at 6 months and 1 year were studied.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in either clinical or radiologic great saphenous vein recurrence after UAVS compared with EVLA at 1 year. The mean pain score at 8 hours after the procedure was higher in the UAVS group (3.7 ± 1.2 vs 2.9 ± 1.0; P = .03). At 1 week, the score was higher in the EVLA group (1.8 ± 0.7 vs 1.4 ± 0.5; P = .01). At 6 months, the venous clinical severity score had improved from 9.2 ± 3.7 to 2.4 ± 1.4 in the UAVS group and from 9.3 ± 3.2 to 2.1 ± 0.8 in the EVLA group (P = .64). At 1 year, the corresponding scores were 1.3 ± 0.7 and 1.4 ± 0.6 (P = .21).

CONCLUSIONS

UAVS has high technical success, making it a suitable alternative to EVLA using a 1470-nm laser.

Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence

BACKGROUND

Great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, causing varicose veins and venous insufficiency, makes up the majority of lower-limb superficial venous diseases. Treatment options for GSV incompetence include surgery (also known as high ligation and stripping), laser and radiofrequency ablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Newer treatments include cyanoacrylate glue, mechanochemical ablation, and endovenous steam ablation. These techniques avoid the need for a general anaesthetic, and may result in fewer complications and improved quality of life (QoL). These treatments should be compared to inform decisions on treatment for varicosities in the GSV. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous steam ablation (EVSA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), cyanoacrylate glue, mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and high ligation and stripping (HL/S) for the treatment of varicosities of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and AMED databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 November 2020. We undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) treating participants for varicosities of the GSV using EVLA, RFA, EVSA, UGFS, cyanoacrylate glue, MOCA or HL/S. Key outcomes of interest are technical success, recurrence, complications and QoL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, applied Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and extracted data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 new RCTs for this update. Therefore, we included 24 RCTs with 5135 participants. Duration of follow-up ranged from five weeks to eight years. Five comparisons included single trials. For comparisons with more than one trial, we could only pool data for 'technical success' and 'recurrence' due to heterogeneity in outcome definitions and time points reported. All trials had some risk of bias concerns. Here we report the clinically most relevant comparisons. EVLA versus RFA Technical success was comparable up to five years (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.38; 5 studies, 780 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); over five years, there was no evidence of a difference (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.41; 1 study, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study reported recurrence, showing no clear difference at three years (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.99; 291 participants; low-certainty evidence), but a benefit for RFA may be seen at five years (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.06; 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). EVLA versus UGFS Technical success may be better in EVLA participants up to five years (OR 6.13, 95% CI 0.98 to 38.27; 3 studies, 588 participants; low-certainty evidence), and over five years (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.60 to 16.10; 3 studies, 534 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear difference in recurrence up to three years and at five years (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.36; 2 studies, 443 participants; and OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.87; 2 studies, 418 participants; very low-certainty evidence, respectively). EVLA versus HL/S Technical success may be better in EVLA participants up to five years (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.23; 6 studies, 1051 participants; low-certainty evidence). No clear difference in technical success was seen at five years and beyond (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.50; 5 studies, 874 participants; low-certainty evidence). Recurrence was comparable within three years and at 5 years (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29; 7 studies, 1459 participants; and OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.76; 7 studies, 1267 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, respectively). RFA versus MOCA There was no clear difference in technical success (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.06 to 54.15; 3 studies, 435 participants; low-certainty evidence), or recurrence (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.81; 3 studies, 389 participants; low-certainty evidence). Long-term data are not available. RFA versus HL/S No clear difference in technical success was detected up to five years (OR 5.71, 95% CI 0.64 to 50.81; 2 studies, 318 participants; low-certainty evidence); over five years, there was no evidence of a difference (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.69; 1 study, 289 participants; low-certainty evidence). No clear difference in recurrence was detected up to three years (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.51; 4 studies, 546 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); but a possible long-term benefit for RFA was seen (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75; 1 study, 289 participants; low-certainty evidence). UGFS versus HL/S Meta-analysis showed a possible benefit for HL/S compared with UGFS in technical success up to five years (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.94; 4 studies, 954 participants; low-certainty evidence), and over five years (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30; 3 studies, 525 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No clear difference was detected in recurrence up to three years (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.77; 3 studies, 822 participants; low-certainty evidence), and after five years (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.71; 3 studies, 639 participants; low-certainty evidence). Complications were generally low for all interventions, but due to different definitions and time points, we were unable to draw conclusions (very-low certainty evidence). Similarly, most studies evaluated QoL but used different questionnaires at variable time points. Rates of QoL improvement were comparable between interventions at follow-up (moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our conclusions are limited due to the relatively small number of studies for each comparison and differences in outcome definitions and time points reported. Technical success was comparable between most modalities. EVLA may offer improved technical success compared to UGFS or HL/S. HL/S may have improved technical success compared to UGFS. No evidence of a difference was detected in recurrence, except for a possible long-term benefit for RFA compared to EVLA or HL/S. Studies which provide more evidence on the breadth of treatments are needed. Future trials should seek to standardise clinical terminology of outcome measures and the time points at which they are measured.

Interventions for great saphenous vein reflux: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

A variety of endovascular and open surgical interventions exist to treat great saphenous vein reflux. However, comparisons of treatment outcomes have been inconsistent.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to compare rates of incomplete stripping or non-occlusion of the great saphenous vein with or without reflux (anatomical failure) at early, mid- and long-term follow-up; and secondary outcomes (reintervention and clinical recurrence) among intervention groups. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) method was used to estimate the probability of the intervention with the lowest anatomical failure rates.

RESULTS

Some 72 RCTs were included. Comparisons of endothermal techniques with open surgery were mostly not significantly different, except for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), which had higher long-term anatomical failure rates (pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.87, 95 per cent c.i. 1.14 to 3.07). Mechanochemical ablation had higher anatomical failure rates than radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (pooled RR 2.77, 1.38 to 5.53), and cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) had a RR 0.56 (0.34 to 0.93) times lower than either RFA or EVLA at the early term. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy had a higher risk of anatomical failure and reintervention than open surgery, with the lowest SUCRA value, and CAC was ranked first, third and first for best intervention for anatomical failure at early, mid and long term respectively. However, clinical recurrence rates were not significantly different between all comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Mechanochemical ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy performed poorly, with higher anatomical failure rates in the long term. The other treatment modalities had similar rates of anatomical failure in the short and mid term.

Symptom improvement after cyanoacrylate glue adhesion and endovenous laser ablation in low-grade CEAP clinical classes

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade primary superficial venous reflux (C₀ - C₃EpAsPr) is a common feature of chronic venous disease. However, the procedural efficacy focusing on symptom characteristics and improvement patterns in this population has not been fully explored.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2019, 325 limbs from 279 patients with C₀ - C₃EpAsPr (including 66.1% with C0-1) who underwent cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) with ultrasonography-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with UGFS were included in this study. Venous symptoms were classified into five categories: leg heaviness, calf cramping, itching sensation, pain, and numbness. A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of a prospectively designed case report form (CRF) was performed to identify the improvement magnitude of each symptom. As secondary outcomes, postoperative changes in symptom severity (0 - 5 points), the Venous Reflux Originated Severity Score (VROSS), the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the ChronIc Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) were evaluated by performing a three-month postoperative data analysis.

RESULTS

After adjusting the data, 174 limbs (87 CA with UGFS and 87 EVLA with UGFS) were matched. Symptoms that showed the greatest improvement after treatment were night cramping (94.7%) and itching (93.8%), followed by heaviness (85.2%), numbness (77.8%), and pain (60.9%). All symptom improvement scores after each endovenous procedure showed similar patterns in both groups. Advantages of CA with UGFS over EVLA with UGFS were observed in procedure time (20.1± 10.6 min vs. 28.4± 10.9 min, p = .001) and perioperative visual analogue pain scores (2.99± 2.34 vs. 3.74 ± 2.49, p = .03). Compared to preoperative values, VROSS, VCSS, CIVIQ-14, and symptom severity scores were significantly improved in both groups (all p < .001). Improvements in all five symptoms (p = .085 to 1.0), VCSS (p = .435), CIVIQ-14 (p = .788) and satisfaction scores (p = .392) three months postoperatively were comparable between the two groups. There were two cases of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis and 24 (27.6%) cases of type IV hypersensitivity reactions in the CA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive endovenous surgery with CA and EVLA provides significant symptom improvement for patients with low-grade CEAP classes.

Clinical Results 5 Years after Great Saphenous Vein Stripping

Background: As a standard treatment for the varicose vein of the great saphenous vein (GSV) type, endovenous ablation (EVA) is the main approach. However, as a background to this, in Europe and the United States, neovascularization (Neo) following high ligation (HL) of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) at the time of GSV stripping has been emphasized as one of the reasons for the high rate of recurrence. However, in Japan, almost no similar mid- or long-term results of GSV stripping have been reported. Patients and Methods: From September 2011 to March 2014 when EVA was not my surgical option, 413 consecutive legs of patients underwent GSV stripping by myself using the same procedure. The patients were contacted by phone 5 years later, and recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS) and reoperation (REDO) were investigated. A total of 270 legs of the 391 living cases (69%) underwent venous ultrasonography (VUS). HL of the SFJ was performed via central flash ligation with towing and pulling out of the peripheral side branches containing the accessory saphenous veins. In principle, GSV stripping was performed using the invagination method in the range of the entire reflux region from the HL cut section to the confluent section of the side branch causing branch varicose veins. The range of stripping was to the upper thigh in 3 legs, to the middle thigh in 3 legs, to the lower thigh in 7 legs, to the knee in 46 legs, to the upper calve in 83 legs, to the middle calve in 52 legs, and over the full length in 76 legs. Stab avulsion was performed as much as possible for the side-branch varices. On VUS, the SFJ's stump of GSV, the presence of side-branch remnants and their reflux, the presence or absence of Neo, and the recurrent lesions in other sites were evaluated. REVAS were classified as follows: Level 1, symptomatic recurrent lesion for which surgery is indicated; Level 2, asymptomatic recurrent lesion possibly requiring future surgery; and Level 3, asymptomatic recurrent lesion that is unlikely to require future surgery. Results: Of the 391 legs of patients who could be contacted, REDO was performed in 23 (6%), including 15 limbs, immediately after this investigation, and symptomatic REVAS were observed in 29 (7%). In 270 legs examined by VUS, REVAS were diagnosed as follows: 29 legs with Level 1 lesion, 40 legs with Level 2 lesion, and 27 legs with Level 3 lesion. Level 1 REVAS that occurred at the SFJ were observed only in 3 legs (1.1%), Level 1 REVAS due to incompetent perforating veins (IPVs) were observed in 14 legs (5%), and Level 1 solitary tributary varices were observed in 9 legs (3%). Conclusion: In this study, REVAS at the SFJ were significantly less than those in the past reports. It has been shown that REVAS due to IPVs or solitary tributary varices were more important than those at the SFJ. (This is a translation of Jpn J Phlebol 2019; 30(3): 259-265.).

Rezidivraten und Form des Rezidivs nach endoluminaler Ablation der Vena saphena magna – Ein Vergleich von Laserablation (EVLA) 1470 nm, Radiofrequenz (RFITT und ClosureFast) sowie Heißdampf mit einer durchschnittlichen Nachbeobachtungszeit von 3,8 Jahren

Einleitung Erkrankungen des Venensystems, insbesondere auch die Insuffizienz der Vena saphena magna (VSM), gehören zu den häufigsten Krankheitsbildern in unserer Gesellschaft. Zur Behandlung stehen neben Krossektomie und Stripping sowie reiner Sklerosierungstherapie verschiedene endovenöse thermische Verfahren zur Verfügung, die in der vorliegenden Studie untereinander verglichen werden sollten.

Methoden Zwischen 2009 und 2013 wurde bei insgesamt 297 Patienten die insuffiziente VSM mit einer der 4 Methoden EVLA 1470 nm, ClosureFast, RFITT oder Heißdampf abladiert. Als primärer Endpunkt wurde die Rezidiv-Häufigkeit definiert. Die Nachkontrollen mit Duplexsonografie fanden 14 Tage postoperativ, 3 Monate postoperativ, nach 1 Jahr und schließlich jährlich mit einer durchschnittlichen Nachbeobachtungszeit von 3,8 Jahren und einer Follow-up-Rate von 81 % statt.

Ergebnisse Zum Zeitpunkt der letzten Nachkontrolle zeigten sich folgende anatomische Erfolgsraten der behandelten VSM: ClosureFast 95 %, EVLA 97 %, RFITT 79 % und Heißdampf 71 %. Schwerwiegende Komplikationen traten nur beim Heißdampf auf (Nekrosen an der Punktionsstelle), die Schmerzintensität lag bei allen Methoden 14 Tage postoperativ bei einem Median von 1–3 auf einer Skala von 1–10, bei den nachfolgenden Kontrollen lag der Median bei allen Methoden bei 1. Sowohl der Global Index Score (CIVIQ-Score) als auch der Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) ließen sich durch alle endovenösen thermischen Methoden signifikant verbessern. In 5–12 % der Fälle trat ein Reflux der zuvor suffizienten Vena saphena magna accessoria (VSAA) auf.

Diskussion EVLA und ClosureFast sind zur Behandlung von Insuffizienzen der VSM mit hoher Erfolgsrate und vergleichbaren Ergebnissen zu Krossektomie und Stripping geeignet. Die Verfahren RFITT und Heißdampf zeigen im Vergleich signifikant niedrigere Verschlussraten und sind damit besonderen Situationen vorbehalten. Besonderes Augenmerk sollte auf das Vorhandensein einer zunächst nicht refluxiven VSAA gerichtet werden. Da sich hier eine erhöhte Rezidivrate bei dieser Vene zeigte, erscheint es sinnvoll, die VSAA primär mit zu abladieren.

What is the optimal treatment technique for great saphenous vein diameter of ≥10 mm? Comparison of five different approaches

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of five different treatment approaches in patients with a great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter of ≥10 mm.

METHODS

A total of 697 extremities of 671 patients who were diagnosed with a GSV diameter of ≥10 mm underwent conventional surgery or endovenous therapy for symptomatic varicose veins between January 2012 and January 2017 were included in this retrospective study. All extremities included in the study were divided into five groups as follows: high ligation + stripping (HLS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cyanoacrylate closure (CAC), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) procedures at 980 nm and 1,470 nm wavelengths.

RESULTS

Among all groups, despite lower recurrence rates in HLS group than the other groups, there was no significant difference at 6 months and 1 year among the HLS, EVLA at 1,470 nm wavelength, and RFA groups. The recurrence rates of EVLA at 980 nm wavelength and CAC groups were found higher than other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study results show that although HLS seems to be an effective method for the treatment of a GSV diameter of ≥10 mm with a low recurrence rate, it does not statistically significantly differ from EVLA at 1,470 nm wavelength and RFA. Therefore, we believe that EVLA at 1,470 nm wavelength and RFA can be preferred over HLS with low pain scores in this patient population.

Combined Lymphovenous Anastomosis and Great Saphenous Vein Stripping for Comorbid Lymphedema and Varicose Veins

Introduction: Treatment for patients with comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins is controversial. Surgical options for these patients are limited. The study was aimed to investigate the validity of combined lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and great saphenous vein stripping (GSVS) for comorbid lymphedema and varicose veins. Patients and Methods: Thirteen patients were involved in the study, and the detail was 21 edematous lower limbs (with coexisting varicose veins and lymphedema; the varicose vein and lymphedema [VL] group) who underwent combined GSVS and LVA therapy. Fifteen patients (with 30 edematous lower limbs and lymphedema only; the lymphedema [L] group) who underwent LVA only were included as a control group. GSVS was performed before LVA in the VL group. Results: No significant differences were seen between the groups at baseline. There were no cases indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern deteriorated after GSVS. No significant difference was seen in lymphatic detection rate; 129.71% ± 58.27% (67%-333%) in the VL group and 122.27% ± 39.47% (50%-250%) in the L group (p = 0.59 > 0.05), respective lymphatic diameters 0.66 ± 0.13 (0.45-0.9) mm and 0.75 ± 0.17 (0.45-1.0) mm (p = 0.07 > 0.05), and respective lymphedema improvement rate 12.17% ± 7.35% (0%-27.4%) and 12.65% ± 7.43% (3.7%-22.3%) (p = 0.86 > 0.05). Discussion: In this study, stripping surgery does not cause lymphatic impairment, at least to the extent that would impede the success of an LVA procedure. Comorbid varicose veins and lymphedema can be treated surgically by a combination of LVA and GSVS.

Validity of Chronic Venous Disease Diagnoses and Epidemiology Using Validated Electronic Health Records From Primary Care: A Real-World Data Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) diagnoses entered in a large electronic health record database in primary care in Catalonia, Spain; to investigate the reliability of these data for research purposes; and to estimate the prevalence and incidence of CVD, chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), and venous leg ulcer (VLU).

DESIGN

Real-world data analysis based on a large electronic health record database in primary care in Catalonia, Spain.

METHODS

We used a primary care research database (Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care [SIDIAP]), which contains anonymous data on some 5.8 million people from 279 primary care centers, accounting for more than 80% of the Catalonian population and 15% of the Spanish population. We evaluated the validity of the ICD-10 codes for CVD in SIDIAP for 200 adult patients through the responses of 20 primary care physicians to a questionnaire.

FINDINGS

The positive predictive value of CVD in SIDIAP was 89.95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.99-93.40). The prevalence rates for CVD, CVI, and VLU were 9.54% (95% CI 9.51-9.56), 3.87%, and 0.33%, respectively. The incidence rates for CVD, CVI, and VLU were 7.91/1,000 person-years (95% CI 7.82-8.00), 3.37/1,000 person-years (95% CI 3.31-3.43), and 0.23/1,000 person-years (95% CI 0.21-0.24), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Catalonian SIDIAP database contains valid CVD diagnoses. The prevalence and incidence rates found using real-world data are low compared with those in the literature, possibly because CVD is an underdiagnosed entity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Real-world data can inform clinicians on lower limb venous health in a population, show changes as individuals age, and reveal aspects where healthcare can be improved.

Efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities: A protocol of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Varicose veins of the lower extremities are common chronic venous diseases in the clinic. Although Western medicine has various surgical methods to treat varicose veins in the lower extremities, there are still a variety of complications. Some studies have shown that Buyang Huanwu decoction treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities has a certain effect, and can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, but there is no evidence of evidence-based medicine. The research carried out in this scheme is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction in the treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities, and to provide reliable evidence for guiding clinical practice.

METHODS

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, which studies the effectiveness and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction in the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities. The patients are randomly and evenly divided into treatment group and control group, the former one is given Buyang Huanwu decoction and the latter one is given placebo. The study will last 49 days, including a 7-day washout period, 14-day intervention and 28-day follow-up, focusing on its efficacy and safety indicators. Observation indicators include: TCM syndrome score, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), Venous Disability Scote (VDS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), Hemorheology Indicators, Adverse Reactions, etc. Data analysis is performed using SPSS 25.0 software.

DISCUSSION

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction and provide clinical evidence for the treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/WGJXT.

"Quality of Life after Varicose Vein Surgery in Patients with High-ligation and Stripping, External Valvuloplasty and Sapheno-femoral Redo Surgery"

BACKGROUND

High-ligation and stripping (HL/S) and external valvuloplasty (eVP) with the implantation of an external device to restore the valve's function, are surgical methods to eliminate reflux at the saphenofemoral junction. Furthermore, redo-surgery (RedoS) can be performed in terms of same side groin recurrences. It is unclear, if there is a difference in quality of life (QoL) between these 3 surgical treatment options. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to elucidate QoL in patients before and after surgical treatment at the saphenofemoral junction by comparing HL/S, eVP, and RedoS.

METHODS

A total of 303 participants (156 HL/S, 81eVP, 64 RedoS) were recruited during the daily clinical routine. QoL was measured at admission and 6 weeks after the surgical procedure by means of SF-12 (12 item short form health survey) and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean value of Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire was 14.5 (SD 2.1) preoperatively and 4.9 (SD 3.3) postoperatively in the HL/S group, 16.4 (SD 1.4) preoperatively and 6.8 (SD 2.5) postoperatively in the eVP group and 15.5 (2.2) preoperatively and 5.8 (SD 4.2) postoperatively in the RedoS group, which was statistically significant (P< 0.05) in all groups. Postoperatively, the mean values were statistically significant within the groups. Concerning physical aspects of the SF-12 we found a significant improvement in the RedoS group, while mental aspects were significantly better in the HL/S and eVP group postoperatively. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of these SF-12 differences is questionable under consideration of the minimal important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Varicose vein surgery leads to a significant improvement of QoL in all groups. The implantation of an external patch could have a negative influence in QoL.

Feasibility and potential significance of prophylactic ablation of the major ascending tributaries in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein: A case series

Background

Recurrent varicosities after endovascular laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) are frequently due to varicose transformed, initially unsealed major ascending tributaries of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ). Preventive ablation of these veins, especially the anterior accessory saphenous vein, is discussed as an option, along with flush occlusion of the GSV. However, few related data exist to date.

Methods

A consecutive case series of 278 EVLA procedures of the GSV for primary varicosis in 213 patients between May and December 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. The ablations were performed with a 1470 nm dual-ring radial laser and always included flush occlusion of the GSV, and concomitant ablation of its highest ascending tributaries by additional cannulation and ablation when this seemed anatomically appropriate. The initial technical success, comprising occlusion of the GSV and its major tributaries, was set as the primary endpoint. Possible determinants were explored using downstream multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The early technical success was 92.8%, with the GSV occluded in 99.6% and the highest ascending SFJ tributary, if present, in 92.4%. Additional ablations of ascending tributaries were performed in 171 cases (61.5%), the latter being associated with success (OR 10.39; 95% CI [3.420–36.15]; p < 0.0001). Presence of anterior as opposed to posterior accessory saphenous vein was another positive predictor (OR 3.959; 95% CI [1.142–13,73]; p = 0.027), while a confluence of the tributary in the immediate proximity to the SFJ had a negative impact (OR 0.2253; 95% CI [0.05456–0.7681]; p = 0.0253). An endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ grade 2 was observed in three cases (1.1%).

Conclusions

A co-treatment of the tributaries is feasible and could improve the technical success of EVLA if a prophylactic closure of these veins is desired, especially if their distance to the SFJ is short. Its effect on the recurrence rate needs further research.

Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations

Thermal ablation of saphenous vein varicosis has developed into a standard procedure for treatment of varicose veins. The clinical success of the endovenous thermal procedure is comparable to high ligation and stripping operations and a significant difference between these groups could not be detected in long-term analyses. The only difference is in the genesis of saphenofemoral recurrence detected by duplex ultrasound: neoangiogenesis occurs after high ligation and stripping operation and after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein a recurrence occurs predominantly via a residual anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV). Reduction of costs by an increase in endovenous procedures carried out in an outpatient setting in comparison to stripping operations, which are still frequently carried out in Germany (in comparison to other countries) as an inpatient procedure, have meanwhile been confirmed. An endovenous crossectomy (i.e., high ligation) should be strived for. Nonthermal endoluminal catheter procedures are predominantly reserved for treatment of the short saphenous vein.

Postsclerotherapy compression: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Compression after sclerotherapy is commonly used, although the evidence base for this practice is unclear. This study aims to summarize and assess the evidence for compression therapy after sclerotherapy to inform clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via Medline and EMBASE databases (1946 to December 31, 2019) by two reviewers. Full-text, English-language studies comparing compression type and/or duration in adult chronic venous disease patients undergoing liquid or foam sclerotherapy were included.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified: five using liquid sclerotherapy, three foam sclerotherapy and one using both. Studies had short follow-up periods (6-24 weeks) and reported on clinical outcomes, quality of life, side effects and complications. In C1 patients undergoing liquid sclerotherapy, any duration of stocking use significantly decreased telangiectasia and reticular vein number and size compared with no compression. No significant difference in clinical symptoms or quality of life was seen when comparing compression duration after liquid or foam sclerotherapy in tributary or truncal veins in C2 to C6 patients. Greater superficial vein resolution was seen with stockings compared with bandages in C2 patients undergoing liquid sclerotherapy to tributary veins. A comparison of stockings vs bandaging revealed differing thrombophlebitis rates but no significant difference in pigmentation. In C2 to C6 patients undergoing foam sclerotherapy, use of 35 mm Hg stockings significantly improved post-treatment symptoms compared with 23 mm Hg stockings. This review was limited by heterogeneity of outcome measurements and the variety of comparisons between compression types and durations.

CONCLUSIONS

Postsclerotherapy compression may have beneficial clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up; however, evidence is lacking regarding its type, class, length, and duration. Further trials are required to guide the optimal management of postsclerotherapy patients.

Minor tributary veins of the common femoral vein near the saphenofemoral junction - A postmortem study

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent varicose veins after surgery are a frequent burden and the saphenofemoral junction is the most common source of reflux. Pre-existing branches of the common femoral vein near the saphenofemoral junction, which may increase due to haemodynamic or other reasons, could play a role in the development of recurrent varices. There exist only a few anatomical data about the prevalence of these minor venous tributaries of the common femoral vein near the saphenofemoral junction. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate their frequency and distribution.

METHOD

A total of 59 veins from 35 anatomical donors were dissected. The common femoral vein with the adherent parts of the profunda femoris vein and the great saphenous vein was exposed and analysed ex situ. The number of minor tributaries to the common femoral vein was counted and their distances to the saphenofemoral junction as well their diameters were measured.

RESULTS

We could identify up to 10 minor tributaries of the common femoral vein below the level of the great saphenous vein as far as 6 cm distally and up to four veins above the level as far as 5 cm proximally. The mean diameters of these vessels ranged from 0.5 to 11.7 mm. Most of these vessels were located near the saphenofemoral junction and 3 cm distally. Directly opposite to the opening of the great saphenous vein we could find at least one minor tributary of the common femoral vein in 57%.

CONCLUSIONS

There exist a vast number of minor tributaries of the common femoral vein and they are mainly located near the saphenofemoral junction. Nevertheless, their role in the development of recurrent varices is still unclear and further studies are necessary.

[Possibilities of using the Colibri system for endovenous laser ablation]

AIM

The purpose of the study was to assess efficacy of endovenous laser ablation of major saphenous veins by means of the Mediola single-ring radial light guides with the use of the 'Optical Handpiece MHP02 (Colibri)'.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This non-comparative prospective study included 430 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 511 endovenous laser ablation procedures from January 2018 to March 2019. The great saphenous vein was subjected to obliteration in 343 (67.1%) cases, the anterior accessory saphenous vein - in 94 (18.4%) cases, and the small saphenous vein - in 74 (14.5%) cases. There were 170 (39.5%) men and 260 (60.5%) women, with a mean age of 52±12.8 years.

RESULTS

The next day after the intervention the patients revisited the clinic for control examination, with the obtained findings demonstrating that occlusion of the target vein had been achieved in all 511 (100%) cases. At 2 months, we examined 411 (95.6%) people with a total of 484 (94.7%) treated veins. After 6 months, 399 (92.8%) people with 472 (92.4%) veins were examined. Recanalization with pathological reflux during the entire follow-up period was registered in 6 (1.3%) cases. Hence, the long-term rate of obliteration amounted to 98.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

1) endovenous laser ablation of major saphenous veins by means of the Mediola laser unit with wavelength of 1470 nm and single-ring radial light guides with the use of the 'Optical Handpiece MHP02 (Colibri)' made it possible to achieve obliteration of the target vein in 98.7% of cases at 6 months of follow up; 2) within the mentioned terms, the need for repeat intervention could appear in 1.1% of cases; 3) the Colibri system provides a possibility of decreasing the final cost of radial light guides for endovenous laser ablation by 30-50%.

Favorable long-term results of endovenous laser ablation of great and small saphenous vein incompetence with a 1470-nm laser and radial fiber

OBJECTIVE

Scarce information is available on the long-term results of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency. We sought to provide data on the status of patients at least 9 years after EVLA.

METHODS

In 2018, we undertook a cross-sectional survey of ambulatory patients who had undergone EVLA in our tertiary care center in 2008-2009. Of 240 eligible patients, 5 died of causes not related to EVLA, 20 refused to participate, and 12 were lost to follow-up. Thus, 203 patients were re-evaluated; of them, 161 (79%) had GSV insufficiency and 42 (21%) had SSV insufficiency. The mean follow-up was 114 months (standard deviation, 11 months). All included patients underwent an echocardiography-color Doppler (ECD) evaluation, a clinical visit, and a standardized medical history. We assessed the competence of the junction and of the treated and untreated saphenous trunk and the presence of recurrent varicose veins. The trunk was considered ablated if it was nonvisible on B-mode or, when visible, if it was noncompressible or without flow or reflux on color flow Doppler analysis. Any recurrent varicose vein with the leakage point located in the treated saphenous vein was considered a failure. We asked patients about the effect of EVLA on their preoperative complaints and about any new or recurrent symptoms. We also recorded any complication or additional subsequent treatment and all data necessary to calculate the clinical class (C of the Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] classification) and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Finally, we investigated potential associations between the study outcomes and variables by multiple logistic regression techniques.

RESULTS

Some 10 years after EVLA, we performed a single clinical and ECD evaluation in 203 patients. Only one recanalization (0.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-2.7) of the treated GSV trunk was observed in an otherwise asymptomatic patient. Up to 98% of patients were asymptomatic or significantly improved after EVLA. Additional subsequent treatments occurred in 21% of patients with GSV insufficiency and 5% of patients with SSV insufficiency. Three complications were observed, two in the GSV group (varicophlebitis, saphenous nerve damage) and one (varicophlebitis) in the SSV group. The mean C class of CEAP and the mean VCSS were significantly lower at the end of follow-up, both in patients with GSV insufficiency (C class, 3.2 vs 1.5 [P = .00001]; VCSS, 6.3 vs 1.6 [P = .001]) and in patients with SSV insufficiency (C class, 2.9 vs 1.1 [P = .00001]; VCSS, 5.4 vs 0.7 [P = .001]). Only the maximum diameter of the GSV at the junction independently correlated with ECD-confirmed reflux in the treated saphenous trunk or in the anterior accessory saphenous vein (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

EVLA using a 1470-nm diode laser with radial fibers provides stable and valuable long-term results in patients with either GSV or SSV insufficiency.

Feasibility and safety of flush endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein up to the saphenofemoral junction

OBJECTIVE

The optimal ablation distance from the catheter tip to the common femoral vein during endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is a matter of debate. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of flush ablation (fEVLA) of the GSV.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included all consecutive fEVLA interventions of the GSV between September 2017 and October 2018. Interventions were performed with a 1470-nm radially emitting fiber. Primary end points were technical feasibility of fEVLA and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) class 2 to class 4. Secondary end points were procedure-related complications; anatomic success at week 6; and flush occlusion at day 1, day 10, and week 6.

RESULTS

A total of 135 consecutive intended fEVLA procedures were performed in 113 patients (86 female, 27 male). The average body mass index was 24.9 ± 4.3 kg/m². The Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical class for these patients was C2 in 78 (57.8%), C3 in 48 (35.6%), C4 in 8 (5.9%), and C5 in 1 (0.7%). The GSV diameter at the saphenofemoral junction was 9.4 ± 2.7 mm with a maximum of 16 mm. In 126 cases (93.3%), concomitant treatment of tributaries with phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy was performed. In 127 cases (94.1%), fEVLA was technically feasible; in 8 cases (5.9%), appropriate catheter tip placement was not possible. In these cases, "standard" GSV ablation 10 to 20 mm distal to the saphenofemoral junction was performed. In the remaining 127 cases, one (0.8%) EHIT class 2 and one (0.8%) EHIT class 3 developed at day 10. After a 2- to 3-week course of anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, these EHIT cases resolved without sequelae. Furthermore, one (0.8%) superficial vein thrombosis and one (0.8%) calf vein thrombosis at the site of phlebectomy were observed. No local groin complication occurred. Flush occlusion was observed in 94.5%, 95.3%, and 88.2% of the cases at day 1, day 10, and week 6, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed no significant association between flush ablation at day 1 and age, body mass index, CEAP class, fiber type, maximum vein diameter, or applied joules per centimeter.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that fEVLA of the GSV using a radial emitting laser is feasible and seems to be safe.

Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue Ablation of Primary Truncal Varicose Veins Compared to Existing Endovenous Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Introduction  One-third of adults in the United States and United Kingdom suffer from varicose veins. n -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue is a novel endovascular, nontumescent, nonthermal ablation technique for treatment of this condition. It has proved effective in multiple studies since its first use in 2013. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of NBCA in ablating primary truncal varicose veins and eliminating reflux compared with existing endovascular techniques. Secondary outcomes include complications and quality of life. Methods  PRISMA was used as a guide and studies were screened for risk of bias and methodological quality. Subjects had to be ≥18 years of age and followed-up posttreatment with color Duplex ultrasound (DUS). Eligibility criteria included saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) incompetence with reflux down truncal veins lasting >0.5 seconds on DUS interrogation and a Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological classification of venous disorders ranging between C1 and C6. Results  Out of 2,910 patients (3,220 veins) in 17 studies, 1,981 were administered NBCA, 445 radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 484 endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with mean procedure times of 25.7, 23.2, and 28.7 minutes, respectively. Mean recruitment period was 9 months (1-36 months) and followed-up for an average of 12.3 months (1-36 months). The majority were C2 to C3. Two-year occlusion rates were 93.7, 90.9, and 91.5% for NBCA, RFA, and EVLA, respectively. NBCA-treated patients experienced the least complications, with bruising, phlebitis, and pain being the most prevalent. Quality of life improved equally in all three modalities. Conclusion  NBCA is simple to administer, safe, and effective even without compression stockings. Further studies are required to assess longer-term benefit and the effect of anticoagulation on vein obliteration.

Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins

OBJECTIVE

The proprietary cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) system vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA) trial (VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System Pivotal Study [VeClose]) showed that CAC, a nontumescent, nonthermal, nonsclerosant ablation technique, was effective and noninferior to RFA in vein closure with good 36-month outcomes. Conducted under a separate protocol, the aim of this extended follow-up was to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of CAC and RFA for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) at 5 years (60 months) of follow-up.

METHODS

This 60-month extension study was conducted for all patients who completed the randomized VeClose study and who were willing to participate. The pivotal VeClose study included patients with symptomatic moderate to severe varicosities (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] class C2-C4b) and symptomatic GSV incompetence who were randomly assigned (1:1) to either CAC or RFA. The primary outcome measure of this 60-month extension study was complete closure of the target vein, with planned exploratory analysis of noninferiority. Secondary outcomes included CEAP class; completion of the Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQol-Five Dimension survey, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire; patient satisfaction with treatment; adverse events (AEs) related to target GSV; and details of adjunctive procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients completed the 60-month visit, which included 47 from the CAC group, 33 from the RFA group, and 9 CAC roll-in patients. No new recanalization events have been observed in the groups between 36 and 60 months of follow-up. At 60 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from recanalization in the randomized CAC and RFA groups were 91.4% and 85.2%, respectively, demonstrating noninferiority of CAC compared with RFA. Both groups demonstrated sustained improvements in EuroQol-Five Dimension and quality of life measures through 60 months. Whereas patients assigned to C0 or C1 clinical class were excluded from the original study, more than half of all returning patients (64% [57/89]) were now assigned to C0 or C1, suggesting an improved clinical class from baseline. Furthermore, 41.1% of returning CAC patients and 39.4% of returning RFA patients are presently at least two CEAP clinical classes lower than at baseline. No long-term device- or procedure-related serious AEs occurred in either group between 36- and 60-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

CAC and RFA were effective in achieving complete target vein closure of the GSV at long-term follow-up, with CAC demonstrating continued noninferiority to RFA. CAC was also associated with sustained improvements in symptoms and quality of life, lower CEAP class, and high level of patient satisfaction without serious AEs between 36 and 60 months.

Two-year results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation to RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA trial)

OBJECTIVE

Endothermal techniques have proved to be effective for treatment of incompetent truncal veins. The tumescentless mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) technique has become an alternative treatment modality, but its outcome with regard to endothermal techniques is still unclear.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial was designed comparing MOCA with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat great saphenous vein incompetence with the hypothesis that MOCA is associated with less postprocedural pain and a comparable anatomic and clinical success rate at 1-year follow-up. Disease-specific quality of life and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were measured using questionnaires. Inclusion was terminated prematurely because reimbursement was suspended.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients (46.3% of intended number of patients) were randomized, of whom 209 were treated (105 in the MOCA group and 104 in the RFA group). Overall median pain scores during the first 14 days were lower after MOCA (0.2 vs 0.5 after RFA; P = .010), although the absolute difference was small. At 30 days, similar complication numbers (MOCA, n = 62; RFA, n = 63) and HRQoL scores (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire: MOCA, 8.9; RFA, 7.6; P = .233) were observed. Hyperpigmentation was reported in seven patients in the MOCA group and two patients in the RFA group (P = .038). In the MOCA group, there were four complete failures (3.8%) compared with none in the RFA group (P = .045), although in one patient at 1 year, the vein showed occlusion. Median 30-day Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was significantly lower at 30 days after MOCA (1.0 vs 2.0 in the RFA group; P = .001), whereas VCSS was comparable at baseline (MOCA, 4.0; RFA, 5.0; P = .155). The 1- and 2-year anatomic success rate was lower after MOCA (83.5% and 80.0%) compared with RFA (94.2% and 88.3%; P = .025 and .066), mainly driven by partial recanalizations. After 2 years of follow-up, no differences were observed in the number of complete failures. Similar clinical success rates at 1 year (MOCA, 88.7%; RFA, 93.2%; P = .315) and 2 years (MOCA, 93.0%; RFA, 90.4%; P = .699) and no differences in HRQoL scores on the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire at 1 year (MOCA, 7.5; RFA, 7.0; P = .753) and 2 years (MOCA, 5.0%; RFA, 4.8%; P = .573) were observed. There were two cardiac serious adverse events, a ventricular fibrillation in the MOCA group (1 year) and an unstable angina in the RFA group (2 years). One deep venous thrombosis occurred in the RFA group on 1-year duplex ultrasound, without clinical sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral treatment with MOCA in the short term resulted in less postoperative pain but more hyperpigmentation compared with RFA and a faster improvement in VCSS. More anatomic failures were reported after MOCA, mostly driven by partial recanalizations, but both techniques were associated with similar clinical outcomes at 1 year and 2 years.

Influence of reimbursement policies on phlebological surgical practice in Belgium between 2007 and 2017

BACKGROUND

To date, it is unclear how treatment of patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) is influenced by national reimbursement systems. In Belgium, catheters or fibers used for endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) are reimbursed only once in a lifetime. The potential impact of the Belgian public health insurance reimbursement policy on surgical practice in phlebology needs to be investigated.

METHODS

Billing data available from the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) were used for analyzing the distribution of specific surgical procedures for treating varicose veins and their relative use from 2007 to 2017. The potential influence of age, sex, social status and geographical origin of insured patients on surgical practice in Belgium were studied.

RESULTS

The annual intervention rate was 343 per 100,000 insured individuals for 2017 with a slight annual increase over the period 2007-2017 (+ 0.83% per year). Patients with limited resources, benefiting from a preferential reimbursement system, had a significantly lower intervention rate than those having the usual system (P<0.001). There was a large geographical variation in the use of care, ranging from 172 to 549 per 100.000 insured in 2017. The number of classic surgical procedures decreased (-6.17% per year) in the period 2015-2017) while EVTA, newly reimbursed in Belgium since 2012, increased during the same period (+ 3.6% per year). This evolution was more pronounced in the north (Flanders) than in the south (Wallonia) of the country. Bilateral treatment increased considerably from 2012 and stabilized at 33% of all surgical interventions in 2016 and 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data of the NIHDI in Belgium highlight remarkable differences in the use of care for CVD, depending on social status and geographical origin of insured patients. The introduction of EVTA techniques has been adopted more rapidly in the north of the country and has led to an increased percentage of bilateral procedures.