An Experimental Study of Paclitaxel Embolisation During Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty

A Library of Custom PEG-Lipids reveals a Double-PEG-Lipid with Drastically Enhanced Paclitaxel Solubility and Human Cancer Cell Cytotoxicity when used in Fluid Micellar Nanoparticles

Paclitaxel (PTX) is one of the most widely utilized chemotherapeutics globally. However, the extremely poor water solubility of paclitaxel necessitates a mechanism of delivery within blood. Fluid lipid PTX nanocarriers (lipids in the chain-melted state) show promise as PTX delivery vectors, but remain limited by their solubility of PTX within the membrane. To improve pharmacokinetics, membrane surfaces are typically coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Recent work has demonstrated the generation of a population of micelles within fluid lipid formulations containing a 2kDa PEG-lipid at a 10 mol% ratio. Driven by the positive curvature of the PEG-lipid (i.e. area of head group > area of tails), micelle-containing formulations were found to exhibit significantly higher uptake in cancer cells, cytotoxicity, and in vivo antitumor efficacy compared to formulations containing solely liposomes. Here, we describe the custom synthesis of a library of high-curvature micelle-inducing PEG-lipids and examine the effects of PEG chain length, chain branching (single- or double-PEG-lipid), and cationic charge on PTX solubility and cytotoxicity. We examined PEG-lipids at standard (10 mol%) and high (100-x mol%, where x=PTX mol%) formulation ratios. Remarkably, all formulations containing the synthesized high-curvature PEG-lipids had improved PTX solubility over unPEGylated formulations and commercially available DOPE-5k. The highest PTX solubility was found within the 100-xPTX mol% PEG-lipid micellar formulations, with particles made from 2k2 (two PEG2k chains) encapsulating 13 mol% PTX for up to 24 h. The pancreatic cancer cell line PC3 exhibited higher sensitivity to formulations containing PEG-lipid at 100-xPTX mol%, the most potent of which being formulations made from 2k2 (IC50 = 14 nM). The work presented here suggests formulations employing high-curvature PEG-lipids, particularly the double-PEG-lipid 2k2, hold great potential as next-generation PTX delivery systems owing to their high PTX solubility, enhanced cell cytotoxicity, and ability for precision targeting by affixation of ligands to the PEG molecules.

Difference in one-year late lumen loss between high- and low-dose paclitaxel-coated balloons for femoropopliteal disease

The objective of the study is to investigate the difference in 1-year late lumen loss (LLL) between the high- (IN.PACT Admiral) and low-dose (Lutonix) paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB). Although a recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated no difference in efficacy endpoint between high- and low-dose PCB, it remains unclear whether high-dose PCB was superior to low-dose PCB in actual clinical practice. We enrolled 64 patients with 67 de novo femoropopliteal lesions who underwent PCB angioplasty at Kokura Memorial Hospital from May 2014 to March 2020 and subsequent follow-up angiography after 1 year. The primary endpoint was 1-year LLL, whereas the secondary endpoints were binary restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) after 1 year. The high- and low-dose PCB groups had 45 and 22 lesions, respectively. Although the low-dose PCB group had higher rates of coronary artery disease, hemodialysis, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia than the high-dose PCB group, the latter had a longer lesion length and more lesions with a TASC classification C or D than the former. The high-dose PCB group had a significantly lower LLL than the low-dose PCB group (0.40 ± 1.05 vs. 1.19 ± 1.03 mm; P = 0.003, respectively). Moreover, the high-dose PCB group had significantly lower rates of binary restenosis at 1 year than the low-dose PCB group (22.2% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.02, respectively). Moreover, negative LLL was only observed in the high-dose PCB group (33.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.005). The high-dose PCB group had a significantly lower LLL than the low-dose PCB group.

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Paclitaxel and Sirolimus Nanoparticle-Coated Balloon

We evaluated a novel dual active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) drug-coated balloon (DCB), which consists of a coating of nanoparticles encapsulating low-dose paclitaxel (PTX) in combination with sirolimus in a synergistic ratio. Compared to the PTX DCB, the dual API DCB demonstrated similar inhibition of cell proliferation in vitro but at a significantly lower total drug dose (over 13 times lower than sirolimus nanoparticles). Animal experiments demonstrated that the dual API DCB is more effective in inhibiting intimal cell proliferation with insignificant downstream embolic effects and myocardial damage compared to the PTX DCB. These findings indicate that dual API DCBs have a high potential to demonstrate improved clinical outcomes and a greater safety profile than the PTX DCBs.

Biological differences of three paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated balloons on coronary lesions in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are important treatment options for coronary artery disease; however, randomised controlled trials comparing various DCB technologies are sparse, and further investigations are needed.

AIMS

This preclinical study aimed to histologically and biologically compare the drug effects and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated DCB (PCB; AGENT), a regular-dose PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) and a sirolimus-coated DCB (SCB; MagicTouch).

METHODS

The DCBs were inflated in the healthy iliac arteries of 18 rabbits, which were euthanised after 28 days. The treated iliac arteries and distal skeletal muscles were histopathologically evaluated, and drug concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

In the histopathological evaluation, the medial smooth muscle cell loss score regarding depth, an indicator of drug efficacy, was significantly higher with AGENT and SeQuent Please NEO than with MagicTouch (4.0 [3.6-4.0] vs 3.7 [3.7-4.0] vs 2.2 [2.0-2.4]), with significant differences in comparisons between AGENT and MagicTouch (p<0.01) and between SeQuent Please NEO and MagicTouch (p<0.01). AGENT and SeQuent Please NEO showed comparable drug concentrations in the treated artery (p=0.61). In contrast, the drug concentrations in distal skeletal muscles were the highest for MagicTouch, followed by SeQuent Please NEO and AGENT (28.07 [13.19-52.46] ng/mg vs 0.66 [0.22-3.76] ng/mg vs 0.25 [0.04-3.23] ng/mg, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that PCBs might have higher efficacy and lower drug concentrations in distal skeletal muscles than the MagicTouch SCB. The efficacy of the AGENT low-dose PCB and the SeQuent Please NEO regular-dose PCB was comparable.

Prevention of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting balloons in patients with postirradiated carotid stenosis accepting percutaneous angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the technical safety and outcome of in-stent restenosis (ISR) prevention with drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in patients with postirradiated carotid stenosis (PIRCS) undergoing percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PTAS).

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, we prospectively recruited patients with severe PIRCS for PTAS. They were randomly separated into two groups based on endovascular techniques performed with and without DEB. Preprocedural and early postprocedural (within 24 hours) MRI, short-term ultrasonography (6 months after PTAS), and long-term CT angiography (CTA)/MR angiography (MRA), 12 months after PTAS, were performed. Technical safety was evaluated based on periprocedural neurological complications and the number of recent embolic ischemic lesions (REIL) in the treated brain territory on diffusion-weighted imaging of early postprocedural MRI.

RESULTS

Sixty-six (30 with and 36 without DEB) subjects were enrolled, with one failure in techniques. For 65 patients in the DEB versus conventional groups, technical neurological symptoms within 1 month (1/29 (3.4%) vs 0/36; P=0.197) and REIL numbers within 24 hours (1.0±2.1 vs 1.3±1.5; P=0.592) after PTAS showed no differences. Peak systolic velocity (PSVs) on short-term ultrasonography was significantly higher in the conventional group (104.13±42.76 vs .81.95±31.35; P=0.023). The degree of in-stent stenosis (45.93±20.86 vs 26.58±8.75; P<0.001) was higher, and there were more subjects (n=8, 38.9% vs 1, 3.4%; P=0.029) with significant ISR (≥ 50%) in the conventional group than in the DEB group on long-term CTA/MRA.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed similar technical safety of carotid PTAS with and without DEBs. The number of cases of significant ISR were fewer and the degree of stenosis of ISR was less in primary DEB-PTAS of PIRCS than for conventional PTAS in the 12-month follow-up.

Low-Dose vs High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon for Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The PROSPECT MONSTER Study Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown comparable outcomes between second-generation low-dose drug-coated balloons (LD-DCBs) and first-generation high-dose drug-coated balloons (HD-DCBs); but the trial patients had low clinical complexity, and there were no comparisons in medically complex populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between an LD-DCB (Ranger; 2.0 μg/mm2) and an HD-DCB (IN.PACT; 3.5 μg/mm2) in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

PROSPECT MONSTER (Prospective Comparison of Second-Generation Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon With High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon) was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial that prospectively collected data from 581 patients who underwent endovascular therapy with the LD-DCB (n = 370) or the HD-DCB (n = 211) for symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease (Rutherford classes 2-5). The primary outcome was the 1-year primary patency of the LD-DCB in comparison with that of the HD-DCB, as evaluated using propensity score matching. The incidence of impaired flow after drug-coated balloon application was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching extracted 163 pairs (358 and 163 patients in the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups, respectively), with no significant intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The 1-year primary patency rates in the matched population were similar between the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups (87.0% [95% CI: 82.5%-91.7%] vs 81.3% [95% CI: 74.8%-88.5%]; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.55-1.59; P = 0.79), as was the incidence of impaired flow (13.6% vs 9.8%; OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.78-2.73; P = 0.24). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effects on the association of the LD-DCB vs the HD-DCB and 1-year restenosis risk.

CONCLUSIONS

LD-DCBs demonstrate efficacy and safety comparable with HD-DCBs in patients with complex clinical backgrounds, suggesting that drug-coated balloon treatment using a lower dose may be possible.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Paclitaxel-Coated Stents in an Experimental Setting

INTRODUCTION

Unlike paclitaxel-coated balloons, pre-clinical data comparing different paclitaxel-coated stents (PCSs) are weak. The study objective was to compare the features of the 2 main PCSs: Eluvia® (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) versus ZilverPTX® (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN).

METHOD

Analysis was carried out on 12 pigs divided into 2 groups: Eluvia® (n=6) and ZilverPTX® (n=6). The pigs received the PCS corresponding to their group in each external iliac artery and were paired one by one, to examine 6 different post-implantation timepoints: after 30 minutes, 6 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days. The paclitaxel concentration measurements and the histological analysis were carried out under blind testing on the plasma, arterial, lymph node, and muscle samples. A linear regression model and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test were used to study the variables.

RESULTS

The plasma paclitaxel rate decrease over 24 hours after PCS implantation was significantly different between the two groups, expressed by the correlation coefficient 0.19 (0.14-0.23; p<0.001) with an undetectable concentration at the 10th hour for Eluvia® versus 3 days for ZilverPTX®. Significantly higher paclitaxel concentrations with ZilverPTX® PCS were observed in muscle samples at each timepoint: extensor digitorum brevis 3.2 (1.17-5.23; p=0.005), biceps femoris 4.27 (2.27-6.26; p<0.001), semi-tendinosus 3.79 (1.85-5.73; p=0.001), tibialis anterior 3.0 (1.37-4.64; p=0.001), and in the femoral nodes 2.27±1.74 ng/g versus 0.14±0.13 ng/g (p<0.001). Histological analysis revealed a trend for more marked intimal inflammation in the arteries stented with ZilverPTX® (p=0.063), especially after the 7th and 14th days.

CONCLUSION

Such a difference in the concentration of paclitaxel in the plasma, muscles, and lymph nodes between the two stents was higher than expected based on differences in device design. The clinical consequences of these results remain to be elucidated, particularly regarding the concerning presence of paclitaxel in muscles and adjacent lymph nodes.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This experimental study compares 2 paclitaxel-coated stents. It demonstrates that differences in stent designs and drug features (coatings and concentrations) translate into differences in terms of concentrations of paclitaxel in the plasma, muscles, and lymph nodes. Our results favor the Eluvia® stent over the ZilverPTX® stent, although more studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

The Role of Drug-Coated Balloon in Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis Management

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis is a common problem leading to dialysis access dysfunction. The conventional balloon (CB) is the most commonly used device during angioplasty but suffers from poor durability of results due to neointimal hyperplasia-mediated recurrence. The drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an adjunct to balloon angioplasty that reduces neointimal hyperplasia, thereby improving post-angioplasty patency. Despite the heterogeneity of DCB clinical trials to date, the evidence suggests that DCBs of different brands are not necessarily equal, and that patient selection, adequate lesion preparation and proper DCB procedural technique are important to realize the benefit of DCB angioplasty.

Application of first-generation high- and low-dose drug-coated balloons to the femoropopliteal artery disease: a sub-analysis of the POPCORN registry

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have significantly changed endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease, in terms of the expansion of indications for EVT for symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). However, whether there is a difference in the performance among individual DCBs has not yet been fully discussed. The present sub-analysis of real-world data from a prospective trial of first-generation DCBs compared the clinical outcomes between high- and low-dose DCBs using propensity score matching methods. The primary endpoint was the restenosis-free and revascularization-free rates at 1 year.

RESULTS

We compared 592 pairs matched for patient and lesion characteristics using propensity score matching among a total of 2,507 cases with first-generation DCBs (592 and 1,808 cases in the Lutonix low-dose and In.PACT Admiral high-dose DCB groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient/lesion characteristics, procedural success rates, or complications between the two groups. First-generation low-dose DCB had significantly lower patency (73.3% [95% confidence interval, 69.6%-77.3%] in the low-dose DCB group versus 86.2% [84.1%-88.3%] in the high-dose DCB group; P < 0.001) and revascularization-free (84.9% [81.9%-88.1%] versus 92.5% [90.8%-94.1%]; P < 0.001) rates. Chronic kidney disease on dialysis, cilostazol use, anticoagulant use, and severe calcification had a significant interaction effect in the association (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT to FPA with first-generation DCBs had inferior low-dose patency outcomes as compared with high-dose outcomes in the present cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Sub analysis of a prospective multicenter study.

Drug-loaded balloon with built-in NIR controlled tip-separable microneedles for long-effective arteriosclerosis treatment

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty has emerged as an effective treatment for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, distal embolism and late lumen restenosis could be caused by drug loss during DEB handling and rapid drug metabolization. Here, a drug-loaded balloon equipped with tip-separable microneedles on the balloon surface (MNDLB) was developed. Inbuilt near-infrared (NIR) ring laser inside the catheter inner shaft was introduced to activate the biodegradable microneedle tips for the first time. The drug-loaded tips thus could be embedded in the vasculature and then released antiproliferative drug - paclitaxel slowly via polymer degradation for more than half a year. A significant increase in drug delivery efficiency and superior therapeutic effectiveness compared with the standard DEB were demonstrated using an atherosclerosis rabbit model.

Comparison Between Clinical Outcomes of Low- and High-Dose Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon in Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesion

PURPOSE

There is a little datum about the impact of paclitaxel dosage in patients undergoing drug-coated balloons (DCB) in endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal lesions. In the current study, the authors sought to compare the clinical outcomes of low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) paclitaxel DCBs for patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal lesions in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population was derived from a multicenter registry named "Evaluation of clinical outcome after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease in Kanagawa" (LANDMARK registry). This registry consists of patients from 5 hospitals in Kanagawa, Japan. Overall, 1,378 patients with 1,777 lesions received treatment between July 2017 and June 2020. Among these, DCB angioplasty was performed in 477 patients (516 lesions). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of LD-DCB (Lutonix; Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) and HD-DCB (IN.PACT Admiral; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 160 matched pairs of lesions were analyzed. Primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 2 years were similar between the two groups (LD-DCB vs. HD-DCB: 72% vs. 70%, p = 0.53; and 75% vs. 73%, p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

The RANGER II superficial femoral artery trial: 1-year results of the long lesion cohort

Background:

The objective of the RANGER II SFA long lesion cohort analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ranger drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients with lesion lengths greater than 100 mm.

Methods:

Patients from the RANGER II SFA randomized controlled trial and long balloon sub-study were included in the long lesion cohort if their baseline lesion measurement was > 100 mm and if they had been treated with a RANGER DCB. Patients had symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease and Rutherford classification 2–4 symptomatology. The endpoints of interest included the 12-month target lesion primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (MAEs).Additional patient outcomes including changes in Rutherford classification were also evaluated.

Results:

A total of 129 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the long lesion cohort. Mean lesion length was 144.5 ± 31.7 mm. Seventy-five lesions had Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) grades 3 (33.3%, 43/129) and 4 (24.8%, 32/129). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the primary patency rate at 12 months was 88.0%. The rate of freedom from MAEs at 12 months was 95.1% (117/123; 95% CI: 89.7%, 98.2%); all MAEs were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (4.9%, 6/123). The 12-month mortality rate was 2.4% (3/125).

Conclusions:

Patients with lesions > 100 mm treated with Ranger DCBs demonstrated excellent 1-year safety and efficacy results, comparable to those of the overall RANGER II SFA randomized clinical trial. This suggests that the Ranger DCB can provide consistent results regardless of lesion length. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03064126)

Clinical Outcomes of Atherectomy Plus Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-coated Balloon Alone in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) emerged as an attractive treatment option for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, achieving the best outcome with DCB needed proper vessel preparation. Thus, the reduction and modification of atherosclerotic plaques by atherectomy were suggested. This study investigated the efficacy of atherectomy in native femoropopliteal artery disease compared with DCB alone using two-center cohorts. As a result, the pretreatment with atherectomy improved the technical success of DCB treatment; however, it was associated with increased minor complications. Additionally, atherectomy plus DCB showed no clinical benefit regarding TLR-free survival or clinical patency compared with DCB treatment alone.

Background and Objectives

Atherectomy as a pretreatment has the potential to improve the outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment by reducing and modifying atherosclerotic plaques. The present study investigated the outcomes of atherectomy plus DCB (A+DCB) compared with DCB alone for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease.

Methods

A total of 311 patients (348 limbs) underwent endovascular therapy using DCB for native femoropopliteal artery lesions at two endovascular centers. Of these, 82 limbs were treated with A+DCB and 266 limbs with DCB alone. After propensity score matching based on clinical and lesion characteristics, a total of 82 pairs was compared for immediate and mid-term outcomes.

Results

For the matched study groups, the lesion length was 172.7±111.2 mm, and severe calcification was observed in 43.3%. The technical success rate was higher in the A+DCB group than in the DCB group (80.5% vs. 62.2%, p=0.015). However, the A+DCB group showed more procedure-related minor complications (37.0% vs. 13.4%, p=0.047). At 2-year follow-up, primary clinical patency (73.8% vs. 82.6%, p=0.158) and the target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival (84.3% vs. 88.2%, p=0.261) did not differ between the two groups. In Cox proportional hazard analysis, atherectomy showed no significant impact on the outcome of DCB treatments.

Conclusions

The pretreatment with atherectomy improved technical success of DCB treatment; however, it was associated with increased minor complications. In this study, A+DCB showed no clinical benefit in terms of TLR-free survival or clinical patency compared with DCB treatment alone.

Clinical outcome of the patients with femoropopliteal artery disease after endovascular therapy: focused on drug-coated-balloon-related distal embolism detected by laser doppler flowmetry

Several trials have shown that paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) significantly reduce restenosis rates. However, some reports have shown distal embolisms occurring after DCBs. No study has analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with DCB-induced distal embolism. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of DCB-induced distal embolism in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. Between February 2018 and April 2019, consecutive patients (n = 32) who presented with de novo femoropopliteal artery disease and underwent endovascular therapy using DCB were retrospectively reviewed in a single-center study. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether distal embolism was detected using laser doppler flowmetry (DEL group) or not (non-DEL group). Baseline characteristics and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. DEL was found in 44% of limbs (DEL group: n = 15, non-DEL group: n = 19). Below-the-knee arterial runoff ≤ 1 (p = 0.033), popliteal lesion (p = 0.044), ambulation difficulty (p = 0.021), and previous history of coronary artery disease (p = 0.013) were identified as predictive factors of DEL. Procedural factors, reference vessel diameter, lesion length, and total drug amount were not predictive of DEL. The overall target lesion restenosis (TLR) rate was 17.4% (n = 5). The TLR rate was not significantly different between the DEL and non-DEL groups (13.3% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.55). Severe calcification was the only significant factor for TLR (4.2% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.02). Among patients with femoropopliteal disease, there was no difference in 1-year clinical outcome between patients who underwent DEL and those who did not.

COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions

Aims

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 μg/mm².

Methods and results

Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2–4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of −10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) −5.2%]; P  _{non-inferiority} < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference −1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI −6.5%); P  _{non-inferiority} < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred.

Conclusion

Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths.

Clinical trial registration

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543).

1-Year Results From the RANGER II SFA Randomized Trial of the Ranger Drug-Coated Balloon

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ranger drug-coated balloon (DCB) (paclitaxel dose density 2 μg/mm²) for treating superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery lesions.

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment prevents reinterventions, but dose and coating characteristics differ among balloons and necessitate discrete confirmation of safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford classification 2 to 4) were randomized 3:1 to treatment with the Ranger DCB or standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Twelve-month primary target lesion patency, freedom from major adverse events (i.e., target lesion revascularization, major amputations, death within 1 month of the index procedure), and patient outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean lesion length was 82.5 ± 48.9 mm for the Ranger DCB group (n = 278) and 79.9 ± 49.3 mm for the control group (n = 98). Ranger DCB was superior to PTA (82.9% [n = 194 of 234] vs. 66.3% [n = 57 of 86]) with observed 12-month primary patency rates yielding a difference of 16.6% (95% confidence interval: 5.5% to 27.7%; p = 0.0013). Noninferior freedom from major adverse events (94.1% [n = 241 of 256] vs. 83.5% [n = 76 of 91]) was demonstrated with a difference of 10.6% (95% confidence interval: 2.5% to 18.8%; noninferiority p < 0.0001). Primary patency rate curves showed significant separation by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p = 0.0005), with rates of 89.8% and 74.0% estimated at day 365 for the Ranger DCB and PTA cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-dose Ranger DCB demonstrated significantly better effectiveness than standard PTA through 1 year and a good safety profile. (Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty [RANGER II SFA]; NCT03064126).

World's First Experience Treating TASC II C and D Tibial Occlusive Disease Using the Selution SLR Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon: Six-Month Results From the PRESTIGE Study

Purpose:

The performance of sirolimus-coated devices has not been studied in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients. PRESTIGE aims to investigate the 6-month efficacy and safety profile of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR) sirolimus-eluting balloon for treatment of TASC II C and D tibial occlusive lesions in patients with CLTI.

Materials and Methods:

PRESTIGE is a pilot prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm, multi-investigator, single-center clinical study. Endpoints were adverse event-free survival at 1 month, technical success rate, primary tibial patency at 6 months, limb salvage success, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and amputation free survival (AFS).

Results:

A total of 25 patients were included. There were 17 (68.0%) males; mean age, 63.7±9.73 years. CLTI severity was based on the Rutherford scale (R5=25/25; 100.0%). Significant comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (n=22; 88.0%) and end-stage renal failure (n=11; 44.0%). A total of 33 atherosclerotic lesions were treated (TASC II D=15 (45.5%)). Mean lesion length treated was 191±111 mm. Technical success was 100%. Primary tibial patency at 6 months was 22/27 (81.5%) and freedom from clinically driven TLR was 25/30 (83.3%). AFS was 21/25 (84.0%; 3 deaths and 1 major lower extremity amputation). Mean Rutherford score improved from 5.00 at baseline to 1.14±2.10 (p<0.05) at 6 months. There was a wound healing rate of 13/22 (59.1%) and 17/21 (81.0%) at 3 and 6 months respectively.

Conclusions:

Selution SLR drug-eluting balloon is a safe and efficacious modality in treating complex tibial arterial occlusive lesions in what is an otherwise frail cohort of CLTI patients, with a high prevalence of diabetes and end-stage renal failure. Technical and clinical success rates are high and 6-month target lesion patency and AFS are more than satisfactory.

Downstream Paclitaxel Released Following Drug-Coated Balloon Inflation and Distal Limb Wound Healing in Swine

•

PCBs are a clinically proven antirestenotic alternative to plain percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of superficial femoral arteries but their application in critical limb ischemia is inhibited by the concern that the downstream release of particulate paclitaxel may negatively impact distal lower limb’s circulation and its tissues already compromised by chronic ischemia.

•

To investigate this concern experimentally, we used an animal model of standardized distal limb wounds to determine the effect of downstream paclitaxel released during PCB treatment of superficial femoral arteries on distal wound healing process.

•

A clinically relevant concentration of paclitaxel in the vicinity of the wound did not impair the healing of preexisting distal cutaneous lesions in healthy swine even after multiple PCB deployments.

The authors evaluated the presence of paclitaxel and healing of distal hind limb wounds created in 27 swine using biopsy punches followed by paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) use in the iliofemoral arteries of healthy swine. After 14 and 28 days, no differences were seen in time course, appearance, and histopathology of wound healing between the single or triple PCB and uncoated balloon treatment despite clinically relevant paclitaxel concentrations in the skin adjacent to the healing wounds. Presence of paclitaxel downstream from the PCB treatment site does not impair the wound healing response of preexisting distal cutaneous lesions in healthy swine.

[Use of drug-coated balloons for interventions on bifurcation lesions of coronary arteries]

Interventions on bifurcation lesions of the coronary bed are one of the most complicated tasks of interventional cardiology. Recent trends are toward active study of using drug-eluting balloons for interventions in this type of lesions. Using such technique makes it possible to minimize the risks associated with implantation of stents in sites of coronary artery bifurcations with good angiographic results. This article is a review of the literature data concerning the use of drug-coated balloons in interventions on bifurcation lesions of the coronary bed, discussing peculiarities of the balloon catheter design, dynamics of delivery of an antiproliferative drug to the vascular wall. This is followed by considering the experience with using innovative sirolimus-coated balloon catheters, as well as future perspectives of these devices for interventions in coronary artery bifurcation lesions.

Stellarex drug-coated balloon: a technology evaluation

The Stellarex® drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an over-the-wire dual lumen catheter with a distally premounted semi-compliant balloon, which has a low dose (2 μg/mm² of the expanded balloon surface) paclitaxel coating. Its hybrid formulation, made of amorphous and crystalline paclitaxel combined with a polyethylene glycol excipient, provides maintenance of coating integrity and adequate drug release. This balanced combination of amorphous and crystalline paclitaxel is able to maintain drug on the surface during handling and balloon tracking, with an effective drug transfer to vessel wall in the lesion site. Clinical data associated with Stellarex balloon are growing and confirm clinical effectiveness over a long-term follow-up without any possible signal of a reduced safety for treated patients.

New Innovations and Devices in the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

As the number of patients afflicted by chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) continues to grow, new solutions are necessary to provide effective, durable treatment options that will lead to improved outcomes. The diagnosis of CLTI remains mostly clinical, and endovascular revascularization remains mostly balloon-based. Multiple innovative techniques and technologies are in development or in early usage that may provide new solutions. This review categorizes areas of advancement, highlights recent developments in the management of CLTI and looks forward to novel devices that are currently under investigation.