1
|
Meschia JF. William M. Feinberg Lecture: Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Current and Future Considerations. Stroke 2024; 55:2184-2192. [PMID: 38920049 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.124.046956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis is an important therapeutic target for stroke prevention. For decades, the ACAS (Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study) and ACST (Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial) trials provided most of the evidence supporting endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenosis who were otherwise good candidates for surgery. Since then, transfemoral/transradial carotid stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization have emerged as alternatives to endarterectomy for revascularization. Advances in treatments against atherosclerosis have driven down the rates of stroke in patients managed without revascularization. SPACE-2 (Stent-Protected Angioplasty Versus Carotid Endarterectomy-2), a trial that included endarterectomy, stenting, and medical arms, failed to detect significant differences in stroke rates among treatment groups, but the study was stopped well short of its recruitment goal. CREST-2 (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial) will be able to clarify whether revascularization by stenting or endarterectomy remains efficacious under conditions of intensive medical management. Transcarotid artery revascularization has a favorable periprocedural risk profile, but randomized trials comparing it to intensive medical management are lacking. Features like intraplaque hemorrhage on MRI and echolucency on B-mode ultrasonography can identify patients at higher risk of stroke with asymptomatic stenosis. High-grade stenosis with poor collaterals can cause hemispheric hypoperfusion, and unstable plaque can cause microemboli, both of which may be treatable risk factors for cognitive impairment. Evidence that there are patients with carotid stenosis who benefit cognitively from revascularization is presently lacking. New risk factors are emerging, like exposure to microplastics and nanoplastics. Strategies to limit exposure will be important without specific medical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Meschia
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Musialek P, Rosenfield K, Siddiqui AH, Grunwald IQ. Carotid Stenosis and Stroke: Medicines, Stents, Surgery-"Wait-and-See" or Protect? Thromb Haemost 2024. [PMID: 36170885 DOI: 10.1055/a-1952-1159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Centre, Krakow, Poland
| | - Kenneth Rosenfield
- Division of Cardiology, Vascular Medicine and Intervention Section, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Adnan H Siddiqui
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, United States
| | - Iris Q Grunwald
- Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Chair of Neuroradiology, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trystula M, VAN Herzeele I, Kolvenbach R, Tekieli L, Fonteyne C, Mazurek A, Dzierwa K, Chmiel J, Lindsay J, Kwiatkowski T, Hydzik A, Oplawski M, Bederski K, Musialek P. Next-generation transcarotid artery revascularization: TransCarotid flOw Reversal Cerebral Protection And CGUARD MicroNET-Covered Embolic Prevention Stent System To Reduce Strokes - TOPGUARD Study. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 65:181-194. [PMID: 39007552 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.24.13121-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stent-assisted carotid artery revascularization employing surgical cutdown for transcervical access and dynamic flow reversal (TCAR) is gaining popularity. TCAR, despite maximized intra-procedural cerebral protection, shows a marked excess of 30-day neurologic complications in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic stenoses. The TCAR conventional single-layer stent (free-cell area 5.89mm2) inability to seal embologenic lesions may be particularly relevant after the flow reversal neuroprotection is terminated. METHODS We evaluated peri-procedural and 30-day major adverse cerebral and cardiac events (MACCE) of TCAR (ENROUTE, SilkRoad Medical) paired with MicroNET-covered neuroprotective stent (CGuard, InspireMD) in consecutive patients at elevated risk of complications with transfemoral/transradial filter-protected stenting (increased lesion-related and/or access-related risk). CGuard (MicroNET free cell area ≈0.02-0.03 mm2) has level-1 evidence for reducing intra- and abolishing post-procedural lesion-related cerebral embolism. RESULTS One hundred and six increased-risk patients (age 72 [61-76] years, median [Q1-Q3]; 60.4% symptomatic, 49.1% diabetic, 36.8% women, 61.3% left-sided index lesion) were enrolled in three vascular surgery centers. Angiographic stenosis severity was 81 (75-91)%, lesion length 21 (15-26)mm, increased-risk lesional characteristics 87.7%. Study stent use was 100% (no other stent types). 74.5% lesions were predilated; post-dilatation rate was 90.6%. Flow reversal duration was 8 (5-11)min. One stroke (0.9%) occurred in an asymptomatic patient prior to establishing neuroprotection (index lesion disruption with the sheath insertion wire); there were no other peri-procedural MACCE. No further adverse events occurred by 30-days. 30-day stent patency was 100% with normal velocities and absence of any in-stent material by Duplex Doppler. CONCLUSIONS Despite a high proportion of increased-risk lesions and clinically symptomatic patients in this study, TCAR employing the MicroNET-covered anti-embolic stent showed 30-day MACCE rate <1%. This suggests a clinical role for combining maximized intra-procedural prevention of cerebral embolism by dynamic flow reversal with anti-embolic stent prevention of peri- and post-procedural cerebral embolism (TOPGUARD NCT04547387).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariusz Trystula
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Isabelle VAN Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ralf Kolvenbach
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sana Kliniken, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lukasz Tekieli
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Charlotte Fonteyne
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam Mazurek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Karolina Dzierwa
- Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jakub Chmiel
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Tomasz Kwiatkowski
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Adam Hydzik
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Krzysztof Bederski
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland -
- Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weissberg JC, Desai KA, Stoner MC. Preoperative Risk Factors Impacting Length of Stay After Transcarotid Artery Revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 103:109-121. [PMID: 38395345 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), using interoperative flow reversal is a unique, hybrid operation utilized in treating critical carotid artery stenosis. Over the past decade, TCAR has been increasingly used to treat asymptomatic carotid artery disease and has a similar risk profile to traditional carotid endarterectomy. Postoperative length of stay (LOS) has a significant impact on cost-effectiveness and quality outcomes in this expanded setting. The objective of this study is to develop a multivariate regression model to identify key preoperative variables and their impact factor on LOS after TCAR for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. We hypothesized that high-risk preoperative patient factors historically identified in carotid endarterectomy would similarly impact LOS after TCAR. METHODS A multi-institution, retrospective study of all adult patients undergoing TCAR with flow-reversal for intraoperative neuroprotection was performed using the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from January 2016 to August 2021. Patients with prolonged preoperative hospitalization (preoperative LOS ≥1 day) were excluded to enhance the capture of carotid artery stenosis as the index admission. Univariate analysis was done on preoperative factors against LOS using nonparametric statistical tests. A multivariate model was then constructed using a negative binomial regression. The study population was split into 80% "training" data for model formulation and 20% "test" data for model validation. RESULTS Thirteen thousand four hundred eighty-three patients undergoing TCAR for asymptomatic carotid stenosis met the study's inclusion criteria with a median postoperative LOS of 1.82 days. Factors in VQI found to have a significant effect on LOS and retained in the multivariate model were lesion type (restenosis versus atherosclerotic), age, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative beta blocker, calcific lesion burden, hypertension status, and race (P < 0.05). The model accurately predicted LOS after TCAR within 1 day for 86.04% and within 2 days for 94.51% of patients in the test population. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale analysis from 2016 to 2021 spans a considerable expansion in the practice of TCAR for asymptomatic carotid disease. All preoperative variables shown to significantly increase the postoperative LOS were derived from the VQI data set. As LOS is a measure of health-care efficiency and cost-effectiveness, this model can be used to identify patients at risk for increased postoperative LOS. It has the potential to be incorporated into a patient/physician decision support tool to optimize resource planning and patient selection for elective TCAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C Weissberg
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY
| | - Kshitij A Desai
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY.
| | - Michael C Stoner
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simioni A, Neves PF, Kabeil M, Jacobs D, Matsumura J, Yi J. Surveillance and risk factors for early restenosis following transcarotid artery revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:1110-1118. [PMID: 38160989 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Restenosis after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a known complication. When identified in the early postoperative period, it may be related to technique. We evaluated our TCAR experience to identify potentially modifiable factors impacting restenosis. METHODS This is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing TCAR from November 2017 to July 2022. Restenosis was defined as >50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound (DUS) examination or computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis's test. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Of 61 interventions, 11 (18%) developed restenosis within the median follow-up of 345 days (interquartile range, 103-623 days). Among these patients, 82% (9/11) had >50% stenosis, and 18% (2/11) had >80% stenosis. Both patients with high-grade restenosis were symptomatic and underwent revascularization. Diagnosis of post-TCAR restenosis was via DUS examination in 45% (5/11), CTA in 18% (2/11), or both CTA/DUS examination in 36% (4/11). Restenosis occurred within 1 month in 54% (6/11) and 6 months in 72% (8/11) of patients. However, three of the six patients with restenosis within 1 month had discordant findings on CTA vs DUS imaging. Patient comorbidities, degree of preoperative stenosis, medical management, balloon size, stent size, lesion characteristics, and predilatation angioplasty did not differ. Patients with restenosis were younger (P = .02), had prior ipsilateral endarterectomy (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = .02), had history of neck radiation (OR, 18.3; P = .01), and lower rate of postdilatation angioplasty (OR, 0.11; P = .04), without an increased risk of neurological events. CONCLUSIONS Although post-TCAR restenosis occurred in 18% of patients, only 3% of patients had critical restenosis and required reintervention. Patient factors associated with restenosis were younger age, prior endarterectomy, and history of neck radiation. Although early restenosis may be mitigated by improved technique, the only technical factor associated with restenosis was less use of postdilatation angioplasty. Balancing neurological risk, this factor may have increased application in appropriate patients. Diagnosis of restenosis was inconsistent between imaging modalities; current surveillance paradigms and diagnostic thresholds may warrant reconsideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Simioni
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Pedro Furtado Neves
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Mahmood Kabeil
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Donald Jacobs
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Jon Matsumura
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Jeniann Yi
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tok Cekmecelioglu B, Legeza P, Tekula P, Giesecke M, Bavare CS, Garami Z, Lumsden A. The intracranial effects of flow reversal during transcarotid artery revascularization. TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI 2024; 32:123-131. [PMID: 38933319 PMCID: PMC11197422 DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.25700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Background This study aimed to assess intraoperative cerebral hemodynamic responses and embolic events during transcarotid artery revascularization via transcranial Doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy, and bispectral index monitoring. Methods Twelve patients (7 males, 5 females; mean age: 72.8±9.0 years; range, 63 to 91 years) undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization with simultaneous transcranial Doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy, and bispectral index monitoring were analyzed in this retrospective study between September 2017 and December 2019. The mean flow velocity and pulsatility index of the middle cerebral artery, alongside near-infrared spectroscopy and bispectral index values, before flow reversal, during flow reversal, and after flow reversal phases were investigated. The presence and frequency of high-intensity transient signals were recorded to evaluate embolic incidents. Results Significant reductions in middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity were noted during flow reversal (40.58±10.57 cm/sec to 20.58±14.34 cm/sec, p=0.0004), which subsequently returned to and exceeded baseline values after flow reversal cessation (53.33±17.69 cm/sec, p=0.0005). Near-infrared spectroscopy (71±4.4% to 66±6.2%) and bispectral index (45.71±8.5 to 40.14±8.1) values mirrored these hemodynamic changes, with notable decreases during flow reversal, and recoveries after flow reversal. The highest concentration of high-intensity transient signals was observed during stent deployment, signifying a critical embolic phase. No perioperative neurological complications or other significant adverse events were documented. Conclusion Transcranial Doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy, and bispectral index effectively monitor cerebral hemodynamics and embolic potential during transcarotid artery revascularization, providing real-time data crucial for optimizing perioperative management. These findings underscore the clinical value of multimodal monitoring in improving patient outcomes in transcarotid artery revascularization procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Busra Tok Cekmecelioglu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter Legeza
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pooja Tekula
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Martin Giesecke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Charudatta S. Bavare
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zsolt Garami
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alan Lumsden
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu J, Rao A, Berger K, Gopal M, Vrudhula A, Han D, Vouyouka A, Ting W, Finlay D, Kim SY, Tadros R, Marin M, Faries P. Determinants of Mortality and Mid-Term Outcomes After Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241235791. [PMID: 38449352 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241235791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The potential benefit of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) over transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) has been studied in the perioperative period with lower rates of stroke and death; however, data on mid-term outcomes are limited. We aimed to evaluate 3-year outcomes after TCAR and tfCAS and determine the primary predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality following TCAR. METHODS Data from the Vascular Quality Initiative for patients undergoing TCAR or tfCAS from January 2016 to December 2022 were analyzed. 1:1 propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor method was used to adjust baseline demographics and clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox Proportional Hazard Regression were used to evaluate long-term outcomes. Iterative stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis and Cox Proportional Hazard Regression were used to identify predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality, respectively, based upon preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. RESULTS A total of 70 237 patients were included in analysis (TCAR=58.7%, tfCAS=41.3%). Transcarotid artery revascularization patients were older and had higher rates of comorbid conditions and high-risk medical and anatomic features than tfCAS patients. Propensity score matching yielded 22 322 pairs with no major differences between groups except that TCAR patients were older (71.6 years vs 70.8 years). At 3 years, TCAR was associated with a 24% reduction in hazard of death compared with tfCAS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.71-0.82, p<0.001), for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. This survival advantage was established in the first 6 months (HR=0.59, 95% CI=0.53-0.62, p<0.001), with no difference in mortality risk from 6 months to 36 months (HR=0.95, 95% CI=0.86-1.05, p=0.31). Transcarotid artery revascularization was also associated with decreased hazard for 3-year stroke (HR=0.81, 95% CI=0.66-0.99, p=0.04) and stroke or death (HR=0.81, 95% CI=0.76-0.87, p<0.001) compared with tfCAS. The top predictors for 30-day and 1-year mortality were postoperative complications. The primary independent predictor was the occurrence of postoperative stroke. CONCLUSIONS Transcarotid artery revascularization had a sustained mid-term survival advantage associated over tfCAS, with the benefit being established primarily within the first 6 months. Notably, our findings highlight the importance of postoperative stroke as the primary independent predictor for 30-day and 1-year mortal. CLINICAL IMPACT The ongoing debate over the superiority of TCAR compared to tfCAS and CEA has been limited by a lack of comparative studies examining the impact of pre-operative symptoms on outcomes. Furthermore, data are scarce on mid-term outcomes for TCAR beyond the perioperative period. As a result, it remains uncertain whether the initial benefits of stroke and death reduction observed with TCAR over tfCAS persist beyond one year. Our study addresses these gaps in the literature, offering evidence to enable clinicians to assess the efficacy of TCAR for up to three years. Additionally, our study seeks to identify risk factors for postoperative mortality following TCAR, facilitating optimal patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Zhu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajit Rao
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelsey Berger
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Malika Gopal
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amey Vrudhula
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Han
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ageliki Vouyouka
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Windsor Ting
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Finlay
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sung Yup Kim
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rami Tadros
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Marin
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Faries
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galyfos G, Katsargyris A, Liakopoulos D, Filis K. Editorial: Minimally invasive vascular surgery. Front Surg 2024; 11:1362571. [PMID: 38288354 PMCID: PMC10822916 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1362571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- George Galyfos
- Vascular Unit, First Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippocration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Katsargyris
- Second Department of Vascular Surgery, Laikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos Filis
- Vascular Unit, First Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippocration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li W, Wu C, Deng R, Li L, Wu Q, Zhang L, Yan T, Chen S. Comparison of Perioperative Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting and Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e356-e375. [PMID: 37863425 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current management guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis are controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the perioperative safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and endarterectomy. METHODS We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 10, 2022, for randomized controlled trials that compared CAS with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) among patients with carotid stenosis. The analyzed outcomes mainly included stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), cranial nerve palsy, the cumulative incidence of mortality, stroke, or MI and the cumulative incidence of death or stroke in the perioperative periods. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated and pooled. Subgroup analyses were based on whether patients were symptomatic or asymptomatic. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. RESULTS Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 12,277 participants (6514 and 5763 in the CAS and CEA groups, respectively) were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that compared with CEA, CAS was associated with decreased risks of perioperative MI (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.29∼0.77) and perioperative cranial nerve palsy (RR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.01∼0.06) but higher risks of perioperative stroke (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.18∼1.87) and cumulative incidence of death or stroke (RR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.20∼1.93). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative safety was equivalent between CAS and CEA. However, CEA may be preferred when considering both procedural safety and long-term efficacy in preventing recurrent stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenkui Li
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chuyue Wu
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Municipality Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Rong Deng
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qingyuan Wu
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Municipality Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Lina Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China; School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Municipality Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Tao Yan
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shengli Chen
- Department of Neurology, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
AbuRahma AF, AbuRahma ZT, Santini A, Beasley M, Davis M, Lee A, Veith C, Roshdy M, Dean LS, Davis E. A single-center experience of 30-day perioperative and one year clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization in 100 consecutive patients. Vascular 2023; 31:1161-1172. [PMID: 35634873 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221106330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the ENROUTE system (Silk Road) has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative to both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Two large registries (ROADSTER 1 and ROADSTER 2) have shown that TCAR has acceptable/low rates of perioperative stroke/death. This study will analyze the 30-day perioperative and 1-year clinical outcomes from a single-center. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from SVS/VQI TCAR surveillance project (TSP) of 100 consecutive patients (102 TCAR procedures) done in our institution. These procedures were done for high-risk patients for CEA, which included anatomical (previous CEA, high cervical lesion, neck radiation, stoma, arch type, etc.), physiological (CHF, severe coronary artery disease, COPD on O2 therapy, etc.) and combined anatomical/physiological reasons. These procedures were done by vascular surgeons after receiving the appropriate training. The perioperative stroke, death, and MI rates were analyzed. Kaplan Meyer analysis was used to estimate rate of freedom from stroke/death and the incidence of ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis at 1 year. RESULTS 100 consecutive high-risk patients for CEA included: 38% anatomical, 44% physiological, and 18% combined anatomical and physiological reasons. The mean age was 72.5 years (range 52-90 years). Indications for TCAR were 34% for symptomatic lesions (TIA/stroke) and 66% for asymptomatic lesions. Mean ipsilateral treated stenosis was 80.4%. Contralateral ≥50% stenosis/occlusion was present in 31% of patients. Technical success rate was 100%. 92% had pre-stenting PTA and 26% had post-stenting PTA. The mean flow reversal time was 8.5 min (range 3-26 min). The 30-day perioperative stroke rate was 2.9% (1/67, 1.5% for asymptomatic patients), the stroke/death rate was 2.9%, and stroke/death and MI rate was 3.9% (4/102). Other perioperative complications included cranial nerve injury 3/102 (2.9%), carotid artery dissection (2%), and major hematoma (necessitated operation evacuation) (5.9%). Freedom from stroke rates and stroke/death rates at 1 year were: 90% and 89%. Freedom from ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent restenosis rates at 1 year were 82% and 90%, respectively. None of these restenosis were symptomatic except two (2/13). Freedom from reintervention rate at 1 year was 98%. CONCLUSION Although the perioperative events were somewhat higher than what has been reported in previous registries, TCAR for patients who are high-risk for CEA has a low perioperative stroke and stroke/death rates with satisfactory outcome at 1 year. Further long-term data is probably needed to verify long-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali F AbuRahma
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Zachary T AbuRahma
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Adrian Santini
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Matthew Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Meghan Davis
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Christina Veith
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Mazen Roshdy
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - L Scott Dean
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Elaine Davis
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Health System Inc, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ginanni Corradini L, Maresca L, Lucatelli P, Balocco S, D'Onofrio A, Stefanini M. The role of post-dilatation in carotid MicroNet-covered stent implantation, evaluated using 3D cone-beam CT angiography. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:608-614. [PMID: 38015552 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12756-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to assess the role and safety of post-dilatation in protected carotid artery stenting (PCAS) using the new MicroNet-covered 2nd-generation stent assessed by cone beam CT scans. METHODS From March 2020 to March 2022, patients were enrolled in the study according to CT angiography results based on the following criteria: Evidence of 70% to 99% carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients and 50% to 99% in symptomatic patients, per the NASCET index. Using a FilterWire EZ™ (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) embolic protection system (EPS), MicroNet-covered stent PCAS was performed by two interventional radiologists with at least 8 years of experience in endovascular intervention. Each patient underwent post-dilatation following stent placement. Finally, a third radiologist (not participating in the interventional procedures) evaluated the cone beam CT scans and calculated residual stenosis. Major and minor complications were recorded in the 30 days following the procedure. RESULTS A total of 192 patients (121 male, mean age 73±10 years) were included in the study, and all patients received post-dilatation following stent implantation. Technical successes were achieved in all procedures. Adverse events noted in this study were limited to periprocedural transient ischemic attacks that occurred in three out of 192 patients (1.6%) and showed a swift complete recovery. The post-dilatation balloon diameters used in the study were: 5.0 mm (30.3%), 5.5 mm (39.3%) and 6 mm (30.3%). Optimized postdilatation resulted in a significant increase in the final luminal area. Similar improvements were observed in all subtypes of plaque. CONCLUSIONS Post-dilatation in protected CAS is safe and induces a significant improvement in the cross-sectional area regardless of the stenotic plaque.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luciano Maresca
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Simone Balocco
- Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Computer Vision Center, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Adolfo D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Stefanini
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mazurek A, Malinowski K, Sirignano P, Kolvenbach R, Capoccia L, DE Donato G, VAN Herzeele I, Siddiqui AH, Castrucci T, Tekieli L, Stefanini M, Wissgott C, Rosenfield K, Metzger DC, Snyder K, Karpenko A, Kuczmik W, Stabile E, Knapik M, Casana R, Pieniazek P, Podlasek A, Taurino M, Schofer J, Cremonesi A, Sievert H, Schmidt A, Grunwald IQ, Speziale F, Setacci C, Musialek P. Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:570-582. [PMID: 38385840 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.24.12933-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mazurek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland -
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland -
| | - Krzysztof Malinowski
- Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- KCRI, Krakow, Poland
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ralf Kolvenbach
- Department of Vascular Surgery in Sana Kliniken, Düsseldorf Gerresheim, Germany
| | - Laura Capoccia
- Department of Vascular Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Adnan H Siddiqui
- Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tomaso Castrucci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant' Eugenio Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukasz Tekieli
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Matteo Stefanini
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Wissgott
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie, Imland Klinik Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Germany
| | - Kenneth Rosenfield
- Section of Vascular Medicine and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Snyder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Andrey Karpenko
- Center of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Waclaw Kuczmik
- Department of General, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Eugenio Stabile
- Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale "San Carlo", Potenza, Italy
| | - Magdalena Knapik
- Department of Radiology, Podhalanski Multispecialty Regional Hospital, Nowy Targ, Poland
| | - Renato Casana
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Piotr Pieniazek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Anna Podlasek
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Precison Imaging Beacon, Radiological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Joachim Schofer
- MVZ-Department Structural Heart Disease, Asklepios Clinic St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Cremonesi
- Department of Cardiology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Horst Sievert
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrej Schmidt
- Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Iris Q Grunwald
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Radiology Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Francesco Speziale
- Department of Vascular Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Setacci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- St. John Paul II Hospital Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lamarca MP, Flores Á, Martín A, Peinado J, Estébanez S, Arriola M, Llergo B, García E, Tique J, Torralbas F, Millán E, Rigolin M, Lobato P, Segundo JC, Morín M, Jamilena Á, Moreno R, Orgaz A. Prospective evaluation of acute cerebral injury by DW-MRI following transcarotid artery revascularization using a double-layer micromesh stent. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:583-590. [PMID: 38078708 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12764-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcervical carotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has demonstrated a low overall stroke rate in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Furthermore, the use of a double-layer micromesh stent is expected to reduce embolization and plaque prolapse. The combination of TCAR and the double layer stent may lead to improved results compared to previously reported outcomes. The objective of this study is to present the findings of a prospective study including patients treated with the Roadsaver stent and TCAR. METHODS Between January 2017 and May 2022, 85 patients were enrolled. Every patient underwent TCAR with the Roadsaver stent. As per our protocol, a neurological examination and an ultrasound were performed within 24 hours before and after the procedure, and again 30 days after. A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was conducted 24 hours before the procedure and 48-72 hours after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the detection of new ischemic lesions on postoperative DW-MRI. The secondary endpoint was a composite of all strokes, death, and myocardial infarction within 30 days. RESULTS Sixty-four patients (75.29%) were symptomatic, out of which 25 were treated within 14 days of the onset of the symptoms. Pre and postprocedural DW-MRI were performed in 83 patients. Postprocedural lesions were found in nine patients (10.84%). There were no strokes or death within 30 days, but two patients experienced a myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that the use of TCAR and the Roadsaver stent could be a safe alternative to carotid endarterectomy because it entails a low incidence of cerebral embolization, even in recently symptomatic and elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María P Lamarca
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain -
| | - Ángel Flores
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Alberto Martín
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Javier Peinado
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Santiago Estébanez
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Maite Arriola
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Belén Llergo
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Enrique García
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Julián Tique
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Fredy Torralbas
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Elisa Millán
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Martina Rigolin
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Paula Lobato
- Stroke Section, Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - José C Segundo
- Stroke Section, Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Mar Morín
- Stroke Section, Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Álvaro Jamilena
- Stroke Section, Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Raquel Moreno
- Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Antonio Orgaz
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Musialek P, Langhoff R, Stefanini M, Gray WA. Carotid stent as cerebral protector: the arrival of Godot. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:555-560. [PMID: 38385839 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland -
- St. John Paul II Hospital, Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable Center, Krakow, Poland -
| | - Ralf Langhoff
- Department of Angiology, Sankt-Gertrauden Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matteo Stefanini
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Casilino Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - William A Gray
- Main Line Health, Wynnewood, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel School of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lankenau Heart Institute, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kedev S. Carotid artery interventions - endarterectomy versus stenting. ASIAINTERVENTION 2023; 9:172-179. [PMID: 37736202 PMCID: PMC10509610 DOI: 10.4244/aij-d-23-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Current management of patients with carotid artery stenosis is based on well-established guidelines, including surgical procedures - carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and endovascular carotid artery stenting (CAS) - and optimal medical treatment alone. Outcomes in the postprocedural period after CAS and CEA are similar, suggesting strong clinical durability for both treatments. Recent advances, which include the emergence of novel endovascular treatment tools and techniques, combined with more recent randomised trial data shed new light on optimal patient selection and treatment in contemporary practice. Improved, modern technologies including enhanced embolic protection devices and dual-layered micromesh stents yield better outcomes and should result in further improvements in CAS. In centres of excellence, nowadays, the majority of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis can be successfully treated with either CEA or CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasko Kedev
- University Clinic of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zarrintan S, Malas MB. What Is the Role of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization? Adv Surg 2023; 57:115-140. [PMID: 37536848 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold-standard method of carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients with ≥50% and in asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) has been associated with higher perioperative stroke rates compared to CEA in several studies. On the other hand, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has outperformed TFCAS in patients who are considered high risk for surgery. There is increasing data that supports TCAR as a safe and efficient technique with outcomes similar to those of CEA, but additional level-one studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TCAR in high- and standard-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Altman Center for Clinical and Translational Research, 9452 Medical Center Drive - LL2W 502A, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Altman Center for Clinical and Translational Research, 9452 Medical Center Drive - LL2W 502A, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miccichè E, Condello F, Cao D, Azzano A, Ioppolo AM, Mangiameli A, Cremonesi A. Procedural embolic protection strategies for carotid artery stenting: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20:373-391. [PMID: 37000987 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2198124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an established procedure to treat carotid artery stenosis for either primary or secondary prevention of stroke. Randomized clinical trials have shown an increased risk of periprocedural cerebrovascular events with CAS compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate this risk, including alternative vascular access site, proximal/distal embolic protection devices, and dual-layer stents, among others. AREAS COVERED This review provides a general overview of current embolic protection strategies for CAS. The phases of the procedure which can affect the early risk of stroke and how to reduce it with novel techniques and devices have been discussed. EXPERT OPINION Innovations in device technologies have dramatically improved the safety and efficacy of CAS. To minimize the gap with surgery, a thorough, patient-oriented approach should be pursued. Endovascular technologies and techniques should be selected on an individual basis to address unique lesion characteristics and vascular anatomies. Meticulous pre-procedural planning, both clinical and anatomical, is needed to assess the embolic risk of each procedure. Only by having an in-depth understanding of the wide range of available endovascular devices and techniques, the operator will choose the most appropriate strategy to optimize CAS results.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cappuzzo JM, Monteiro A, Waqas M, Baig AA, Popoola DO, Almayman F, Khawar WI, Farkash ZG, Davies JM, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Snyder KV. Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Walrus Balloon Guide Catheter With Flow Reversal for Proximal Embolic Protection: Technical Description and Single-Center Case Series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 24:11-16. [PMID: 36251417 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of modern transfemoral balloon guide catheters (BGC) for flow reversal during carotid artery stenting is scarcely described in the literature but represents a promising and efficient technique for embolic protection. OBJECTIVE To describe a flow-reversal technique using the Walrus BGC (Q'Apel Medical Inc.) and report our center's experience. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective carotid artery stenting with the use of flow reversal through the Walrus BGC between July 2020 and September 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural details, and clinical follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred and five patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 ± 9.4 years, and 36 (34.3%) were women. The most common comorbidities were hyperlipidemia (76.2%) and hypertension (57.1%). Fifty-nine (56.2%) patients were symptomatic. Ninety-nine (94.3%) patients had stenosis ≥70%. Contralateral stenosis ≥50% was present in 44 patients (41.9%). Distal filters were used after flow reversal was established in 90 patients (85.7%). Angioplasty was performed in 85 patients (80.9%). Stenting was successful in 100% of cases. No periprocedural transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or strokes occurred. Stroke occurred in 2 patients (1.9%) during the 30-day follow-up period, resulting in 1 (0.9%) death. CONCLUSION In our experience, this technique was safe, feasible, and efficient, with 100% technical success and no periprocedural thromboembolic complications. More extensive studies are needed to establish the role of proximal protection with flow reversal using modern BGCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Cappuzzo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Andre Monteiro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Muhammad Waqas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Ammad A Baig
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Daniel O Popoola
- Jacobs School of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Faisal Almayman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Wasiq I Khawar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Zoe G Farkash
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Jason M Davies
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Adnan H Siddiqui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Elad I Levy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth V Snyder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.,Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zeebregts CJ, Paraskevas KI. The New 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Carotid Guidelines - The European Perspective. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:3-4. [PMID: 35533843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pineau S, Fajardo A, Saqib NU, Tanaka A, Motaganahalli RL, Keyhani A, Keyhani K, Wang KS. Transcarotid Revascularization Timing and Early Postoperative Outcomes in Symptomatic Patients. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2022; 57:344-349. [PMID: 36533891 DOI: 10.1177/15385744221146678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed several days after onset of symptoms has been shown to be optimal in preventing procedure-related stroke. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is an alternative hybrid procedure to treat high-risk for CEA patients. In this investigation, our aim is to determine the effect of timing of TCAR in symptomatic patients. Methods Procedures were captured prospectively at 2 independent health systems from 2016-2022 within a carotid intervention database. A retrospective analysis of this database was performed to generate cohorts by time to revascularization from onset of symptoms, with the short-interval revascularization (SIR) group defined as having a time to revascularization between 2-5 days; and long-interval revascularization (LIR) group having a time to revascularization of 6-180 days. Univariate analysis was performed comparing the cohorts at an α of .05. Results During the study period, 875 TCARs were captured, including 321 procedures performed in symptomatic patients. Of these, 84 had revascularization performed within 6 days after onset of symptoms (SIR) while 237 additional cases were completed 6 or more days after onset of symptoms (LIR). Baseline comorbidities were grossly similar between cohorts. Intraoperatively, SIR patients were less likely to develop bradycardia (4.8% vs 22.2%, P = .01) and experienced a shorter operative time (58 minutes vs 65 minutes, P = .02). Estimated blood loss, flow reversal time, radiation exposure, fluoroscopic time and contrast volume were identical between the groups. Length of stay in SIR patients was longer (1, IQR [1-3] vs 1, IQR [1-2] days, P < .01). Additionally, SIR patients seemed to trend toward a higher rate of reinterventions (3.6% vs .4%, P = .06). The incidence of ipsilateral or contralateral stroke, cranial nerve palsy, myocardial infarction, hematoma, stent thrombosis and death were statistically identical between the 2 groups. Conclusion Like the previous results established for CEA, symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR demonstrate similar outcomes if the procedure is performed 48 hours after the neurologic event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvestre Pineau
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andres Fajardo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Akiko Tanaka
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raghu L. Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Arash Keyhani
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kourosh Keyhani
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keisin S. Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mazurek A, Malinowski K, Rosenfield K, Capoccia L, Speziale F, de Donato G, Setacci C, Wissgott C, Sirignano P, Tekieli L, Karpenko A, Kuczmik W, Stabile E, Metzger DC, Amor M, Siddiqui AH, Micari A, Pieniążek P, Cremonesi A, Schofer J, Schmidt A, Musialek P. Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164819. [PMID: 36013058 PMCID: PMC9409706 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Single-cohort studies suggest that second-generation stents (SGS; “mesh stents”) may improve carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes by limiting peri- and postprocedural cerebral embolism. SGS differ in the stent frame construction, mesh material, and design, as well as in mesh-to-frame position (inside/outside). Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes of SGS in relation to first-generation stents (FGSs; single-layer) in CAS. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with FGSs and SGS (PRISMA methodology, 3302 records). Endpoints were 30-day death, stroke, myocardial infarction (DSM), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke (IS) and restenosis (ISR). A random-effect model was applied. Results: Data of 68,422 patients from 112 eligible studies (68.2% men, 44.9% symptomatic) were meta-analyzed. Thirty-day DSM was 1.30% vs. 4.11% (p < 0.01, data for SGS vs. FGS). Among SGS, both Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard reduced 30-day DSM (by 2.78 and 3.03 absolute percent, p = 0.02 and p < 0.001), whereas the Gore stent was neutral. SGSs significantly improved outcomes compared with closed-cell FGS (30-day stroke 0.6% vs. 2.32%, p = 0.014; DSM 1.3% vs. 3.15%, p < 0.01). At 12 months, in relation to FGS, Casper/Roadsaver reduced IS (−3.25%, p < 0.05) but increased ISR (+3.19%, p = 0.04), CGuard showed a reduction in both IS and ISR (−3.13%, −3.63%; p = 0.01, p < 0.01), whereas the Gore stent was neutral. Conclusions: Pooled SGS use was associated with improved short- and long-term clinical results of CAS. Individual SGS types, however, differed significantly in their outcomes, indicating a lack of a “mesh stent” class effect. Findings from this meta-analysis may provide clinically relevant information in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mazurek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Krzysztof Malinowski
- Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
| | - Kenneth Rosenfield
- Vascular Surgery, Surgery Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Laura Capoccia
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Speziale
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Setacci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Christian Wissgott
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie, Imland Klinik Rendsburg, 24768 Rendsburg, Germany
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Lukasz Tekieli
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
| | - Andrey Karpenko
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Waclaw Kuczmik
- Department of General, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
| | | | | | - Max Amor
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, U.C.C.I. Polyclinique d’Essey, 54270 Nancy, France
| | - Adnan H. Siddiqui
- Department of Neurosurgery, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Antonio Micari
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Piotr Pieniążek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
| | - Alberto Cremonesi
- Cardiovascular Department, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Joachim Schofer
- MVZ-Department Structural Heart Disease, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrej Schmidt
- Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
- Correspondence: (A.M.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ribieras AJ, Tabbara M, Rey J, Velazquez OC, Bornak A. Outcomes and role of shunting during carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1289-1297. [PMID: 35810956 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shunt placement during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is often advocated to protect the ischemic penumbra in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. This study assesses the effect of shunt placement on postoperative stroke risk in symptomatic patients undergoing CEA. METHODS We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2019) for CEA cases with complete CEA procedure-targeted data. Symptomatic patients were identified as having a preoperative diagnosis of stroke on presentation (DS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax (AF), or temporary monocular blindness (TMB). DS patients were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke based on their modified Rankin Scale (mRS). To better assess the effect of shunt placement on stroke rate, we compared cases of CEA with patch angioplasty technique, with and without the use of intraoperative shunt. Patients who underwent carotid eversion or primary closure were excluded. Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative stroke and cranial nerve injury. RESULTS We identified 4,652 cases of CEA with patch angioplasty in symptomatic patients, including 1,889 (40.6%) with shunt placement and 2,763 (59.4%) without. Age, race, and sex distributions were similar for both procedures. Compared to patients without shunt, those with shunt had significantly higher rates of emergency (9.1% vs 7.0%, P = .010) and non-elective surgery (40.3% vs 37.2%, P = .035), general anesthesia (97.0% vs 86.3%, P < .001), and bleeding disorders (27.2% vs 22.7%, P < .001). Thirty-day incidence of postoperative stroke was similar between patients who had shunt placement (3.2%) and those who did not (2.6%) (P = .219). Additionally, subgroup analysis failed to show any benefit of shunting on postoperative stroke regardless of preoperative symptoms or neurologic disability. In contrast, shunt placement was associated with increased rate of cranial nerve injury (4.1% vs 2.4%, P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that non-elective surgery (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.36-2.91, P < .001) and DS (vs TIA/AF/TMB) (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12-2.41, P = .012) were predictive of 30-day postoperative stroke. After adjusting for confounders, shunt placement had no effect on stroke risk at 30 days but remained an independent risk factor for cranial nerve injury (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.32-2.64, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In symptomatic patients undergoing CEA with patch angioplasty, shunting is associated with increased risk of cranial nerve injury without reduction in postoperative stroke risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine J Ribieras
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Marwan Tabbara
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Jorge Rey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Omaida C Velazquez
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Arash Bornak
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
White CJ, Brott TG, Gray WA, Heck D, Jovin T, Lyden SP, Metzger DC, Rosenfield K, Roubin G, Sachar R, Siddiqui A. Carotid Artery Stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:155-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
24
|
Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Antignani PL, Ascher E, Baradaran H, Bokkers RPH, Cambria RP, Comerota AJ, Dardik A, Davies AH, Eckstein HH, Faggioli G, Fernandes E Fernandes J, Fraedrich G, Geroulakos G, Gloviczki P, Golledge J, Gupta A, Jezovnik MK, Kakkos SK, Katsiki N, Knoflach M, Eline Kooi M, Lanza G, Lavenson GS, Liapis CD, Loftus IM, Mansilha A, Millon A, Nicolaides AN, Pini R, Poredos P, Proczka RM, Ricco JB, Riles TS, Ringleb PA, Rundek T, Saba L, Schlachetzki F, Silvestrini M, Spinelli F, Stilo F, Sultan S, Suri JS, Svetlikov AV, Zeebregts CJ, Chaturvedi S. Comparison of Recent Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Angiology 2022; 73:903-910. [PMID: 35412377 DOI: 10.1177/00033197221081914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Despite the publication of several national/international guidelines, the optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) remains controversial. This article compares 3 recently released guidelines (the 2020 German-Austrian, the 2021 European Stroke Organization [ESO], and the 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery [SVS] guidelines) vs the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines regarding the optimal management of AsxCS patients.The 2017 ESVS guidelines defined specific imaging/clinical parameters that may identify patient subgroups at high future stroke risk and recommended that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered for these individuals. The 2020 German-Austrian guidelines provided similar recommendations with the 2017 ESVS Guidelines. The 2021 ESO Guidelines also recommended CEA for AsxCS patients at high risk for stroke on best medical treatment (BMT), but recommended against routine use of CAS in these patients. Finally, the SVS guidelines provided a strong recommendation for CEA+BMT vs BMT alone for low-surgical risk patients with >70% AsxCS. Thus, the ESVS, German-Austrian, and ESO guidelines concurred that all AsxCS patients should receive risk factor modification and BMT, but CEA should or CAS may also be considered for certain AsxCS patient subgroups at high risk for future ipsilateral ischemic stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dimitri P Mikhailidis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London Medical School, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | | | - Enrico Ascher
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 12297Vascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Hediyeh Baradaran
- Department of Radiology, 14434University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Reinoud P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, 10173University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Cambria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony J Comerota
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Alan Dardik
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alun H Davies
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College and Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna "Alma Mater Studiorum", Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Gustav Fraedrich
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - George Geroulakos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, 69038"Attikon" University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter Gloviczki
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 6915Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan Golledge
- Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University and Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, 466371Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mateja K Jezovnik
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, U.S.A
| | - Stavros K Kakkos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, 37795University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Niki Katsiki
- First Department of Internal Medicine, 37782AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Michael Knoflach
- Department of Neurology, 27280Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Eline Kooi
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, 46837Maastricht University, Maaastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 46837Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gaetano Lanza
- Vascular Surgery Department, 46837IRCSS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
| | - George S Lavenson
- Department of Surgery, 1685Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Ian M Loftus
- St George's Vascular Institute, St George's University London, London, UK
| | - Armando Mansilha
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
| | - Antoine Millon
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 26899Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Andrew N Nicolaides
- Department of Surgery, 121343University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Rodolfo Pini
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna "Alma Mater Studiorum", Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pavel Poredos
- Department of Vascular Disease, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Robert M Proczka
- 1stDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Medicover Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jean-Baptiste Ricco
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Poitiers, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Thomas S Riles
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, 12297New York University Langone Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Tatjana Rundek
- Department of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, 12235University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, 97863Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Felix Schlachetzki
- Department of Neurology, 210419University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mauro Silvestrini
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 9294Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Spinelli
- Vascular Surgery Division, 9311Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Stilo
- Vascular Surgery Division, 9311Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sherif Sultan
- Western Vascular Institute, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, USA
| | - Alexei V Svetlikov
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, North-Western Scientific Clinical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, St Petersburgh, Russia
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Galyfos G, Liakopoulos D, Sigala F, Filis K. New paradigms in minimally-invasive vascular surgery. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2022; 20:207-214. [PMID: 35341434 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2058492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vascular surgery has been greatly evolved during the last decades and novel minimally invasive techniques have been introduced. Aim of this review is to briefly present all these advances and compare them with traditional repairs. AREAS COVERED The authors have extensively searched literature through the Pubmed and Embase databases. All articles published up to December 2021 referring to minimally invasive techniques used for treatment of peripheral artery disease, carotid disease, aortic aneurysms and venous disease were evaluated. Minimally invasive techniques under investigation included endovascular and hybrid techniques, robot-assisted and laparoscopic approaches. EXPERT OPINION Several minimally invasive techniques such as endovascular and hybrid approaches have been extensively used during the last two decades to treat vascular surgery patients offering them lower mortality and morbidity risks. Novel robot assisted techniques have shown promising results in preclinical studies although further clinical evaluation is needed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Mazurek A, Borratynska A, Gancarczyk U, Czyz L, Sikorska M, Tekieli L, Sobien B, Jakiel M, Trystula M, Drazkiewicz T, Podolec P, Musialek P. Diabetes Mellitus and Clinical Outcomes in Carotid Artery Revascularization Using Second-Generation, MicroNet-Covered Stents: Analysis from the PARADIGM Study. J Diabetes Res 2022; 2022:8691842. [PMID: 36200003 PMCID: PMC9529505 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8691842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using conventional (single-layer) stents is associated with worse clinical outcomes in diabetes mellitus (DM) vs. non-DM patients: an effect driven largely by lesion-related adverse events. CAS outcomes with MicroNet-covered stents (MCS) in diabetic patients have not been evaluated. AIM To compare short- and long-term clinical outcomes and restenosis rate in DM vs. non-DM patients with carotid stenosis treated using MCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a prospective study in all-comer symptomatic and increased-stroke-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis, 101 consecutive patients (age 51-86 years, 41% diabetics) underwent 106 MCS-CAS. Clinical outcomes and duplex ultrasound velocities were assessed periprocedurally and at 30 days/12 months. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of DM vs. non-DM patients were similar except for a higher prevalence of recent cerebral symptoms in DM. Type 1 and type 1+2 plaques were more prevalent in DM patients (26.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.02; 62.2% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.01). Proximal embolic protection was more prevalent in DM (60% vs. 36%; p = 0.015). 30-day clinical complications were limited to a single periprocedural minor stroke in DM (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.22). 12-month in-stent velocities and clinical outcomes were not different (death rate 4.8% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.69; no new strokes). Restenosis rate was not different (0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS MCS may offset the adverse impact of DM on periprocedural, 30-day, and 12-month clinical complications of CAS and minimize the risk of in-stent restenosis. In this increased-stroke-risk cohort, adverse event rate was low both in DM and non-DM. Further larger-scale clinical datasets including extended follow-ups are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mazurek
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Anna Borratynska
- John Paul II Hospital, Neurology Outpatient Department, Krakow, Poland
| | - Urszula Gancarczyk
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Lukasz Czyz
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Martyna Sikorska
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Lukasz Tekieli
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Interventional Cardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Bartosz Sobien
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Marcin Jakiel
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Mariusz Trystula
- John Paul II Hospital, Department of Vascular Surgery, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Podolec
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Musialek
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac & Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gao J, Chen Z, Kou L, Zhang H, Yang Y. The Efficacy of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal System Compared to Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:695295. [PMID: 34869622 PMCID: PMC8640218 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenosis has long been a critical cause of stroke and death, and it can seriously affect the life quality. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are both feasible therapies for this disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate if the efficacy of the two approaches is comparable. Methods: Clinical studies up to March 2021 were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from a computer. The screening process was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for methodological quality assessment of works of literature meeting the inclusion criteria, and Review Manager 5.4 was used for data synthesis. The I2 statistic was performed to measure the heterogeneity, and M-H/I-V fixed or random model was utilized depending on the I2 value. The evidence evaluation was accomplished based on grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) online tool. Results: A total of 14,200 subjects (six comparative studies) were finally included in this pooled study. There is no statistical discrepancy between the two treatments on reducing stroke/death/myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.67–1.07), stroke (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77–1.37), or death (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.67–1.94). Besides, TCAR is associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (P = 0.004), cranial nerve injury (P < 0.00001), and shorter procedure time (P < 0.00001) than CEA among the overall cohort. Conclusions: TCAR is a rapidly developing treatment that reaches a comparable prognosis to CEA and significantly reduces the risk of myocardial infarction under the well-matched condition, which is a dependable choice for patients with carotid stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Gao
- Department of Vascular, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Chen
- Department of Vascular, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Kou
- Department of Vascular, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hanfang Zhang
- Department of Vascular, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yaoguo Yang
- Department of Vascular, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Karpenko A, Bugurov S, Ignatenko P, Starodubtsev V, Popova I, Malinowski K, Musialek P. Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus MicroNet-Covered Stent in Carotid Artery Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2377-2387. [PMID: 34736737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare procedure-related ipsilateral cerebral embolism with a conventional (Acculink, Abbott Vascular) versus a MicroNet-covered (CGuard, InspireMD) stent in carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND The MicroNet-covered stent may reduce periprocedural cerebral embolism in CAS, but level 1 evidence is lacking. METHODS A total of 100 consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to filter-protected CAS using the Acculink or the CGuard device. The study was powered for its primary endpoint of at least 50% reduction in ipsilateral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging lesion average volume 48 hours postprocedure (blinded external core laboratory analysis). RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the study groups were similar. Eighty-two (total volume = 18,212 mm3) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging postprocedural cerebral lesions occurred in 26 Acculink-treated patients and 45 lesions (total volume = 3,930 mm3; 78.4% reduction) in 25 CGuard-treated patients. New cerebral lesion average volume was 171 mm3 vs 73 mm3 (P = 0.017) per affected patient and 222 mm3 vs 84 mm3 (P = 0.038) per lesion (Acculink vs CGuard). In lesion-affected patients, the average sum of lesion volumes was 701 mm3 vs 157 mm3 (P = 0.007). The Acculink significantly increased the risk for multiple (≥5) cerebral lesions (relative risk: 7.8; 95% CI: 1.3-14.9; P = 0.021). At 30 days, new permanent (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) lesion prevalence was 3:1 (P < 0.001), with total permanent lesion volume 7,474 mm3 vs 574 mm3 (92.3% reduction with the CGuard). There were 6 vs 0 new ipsilateral lesions (P = 0.030) and 2 versus 0 strokes. CONCLUSIONS The MicroNet-covered stent significantly reduced periprocedural and abolished postprocedural cerebral embolism in relation to a conventional carotid stent. This is consistent with the MicroNet-covered stent's sustained embolism prevention, translating into cerebral protection not only during but also after CAS. The present findings may influence decision making in carotid revascularization. (The SIBERIA Trial [Acculink™ Versus CGuard™]; NCT03488199).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Karpenko
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | - Savr Bugurov
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Pavel Ignatenko
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Vladimir Starodubtsev
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Irina Popova
- Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - Piotr Musialek
- Jagiellonian University, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zum aktuellen Stand von transcarotidaler arterieller Revaskularisation (TCAR). GEFÄSSCHIRURGIE 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00772-021-00789-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|