1
|
Ramachandran M, Unkart JT, Willie-Permor D, Hamouda M, Elsayed N, Malas MB. The Obesity Paradox Exists for Perioperative Complications and Mortality Following Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)01067-X. [PMID: 38642672 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The obesity paradox refers to a phenomenon by which obese individuals experience lower risk of mortality and even protective associations from chronic disease sequelae when compared to the non-obese and underweight population. Prior literature has demonstrated an obesity paradox after cardiac and other surgical procedures. However, the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and perioperative complications for patients undergoing major open lower extremity arterial revascularization is unclear. METHODS We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) for individuals receiving unilateral infrainguinal bypass between 2003 and 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship of BMI categories [underweight (<18.5), non-obese (18.5-24.9), Overweight (25-29.9), Class 1 obesity (30-34.9), Class 2 obesity (35-39.9) and Class 3 obesity (>40)] with 30-day mortality, surgical site infection (SSI) and adverse cardiovascular events. We adjusted the models for key patient demographics, comorbidities, technical and perioperative characteristics. RESULTS From 2003-2020, 60,588 arterial bypass procedures met inclusion criteria for analysis. Upon multivariable logistic regression with the non-obese category as reference group, odds of 30-day mortality were significantly decreased among the overweight [OR: 0.64, (95% CI: 0.53-0.78)], Class 1 obese [OR: 0.65, (95 % CI: 0.52-0.81)], Class 2 obese [OR: 0.66, (95 % CI: 0.48-0.90)] and Class 3 obese [OR: 0.61, (95 % CI: 0.39-0.97)] patient categories. Conversely, odds of 30-day mortality were increased in the underweight patient group [OR: 1.58, (95% CI: 1.16-2.13)]. Furthermore, a BMI-dependent positive association was present with odds of SSI with patients in Class 3 obesity having the highest odds [OR: 2.10, (95% CI: 1.60-2.76)]. Finally, among the adverse cardiovascular event outcomes assessed, only myocardial infarction (MI) demonstrated decreased odds among overweight [OR: 0.82, (95 % CI: 0.71-0.96)], Class 1 obese [OR: 0.78, (95 % CI: 0.65-0.93)] and Class 2 obese [OR: 0.66, (95 % CI: 0.51-0.86)] patient populations. Odds of MI among the underweight and Class 3 obesity groups were not significant. CONCLUSIONS The obesity paradox is evident in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass procedures, particularly with odds of 30-day mortality and myocardial infarction. Our findings suggest that having higher BMI (overweight and Class 1-3 obesity) is not associated with increased mortality and should not be interpreted as a contraindication for lower extremity arterial bypass surgery. However, these patients should be under vigilant surveillance for SSI. Finally, patients that are underweight have a significantly increased odds of 30-day mortality and may be more suitable candidates for endovascular therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mokhshan Ramachandran
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mohammed Hamouda
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakhaei P, Hamouda M, Malas MB. "The Double Burden: Deciphering Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in End-Stage Renal Disease". Ann Vasc Surg 2024:S0890-5096(24)00151-1. [PMID: 38599491 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) in patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its unique pathology and poor treatment outcomes. This review calls for a tailored classification and risk assessment for these patients to guide better revascularization choices with early minor amputation as a first-line strategy in advanced stages. METHODS This review consolidates key findings from recent literature on CLTI in ESRD, focusing on disease mechanisms, treatment options, and patient outcomes. It evaluates the literature to clarify the decision-making process for managing CLTI in ESRD. RESULTS CLTI in ESRD patients often results in worse clinical outcomes, such as non-healing wounds, increased limb loss, and higher mortality rates. While the literature reveals ongoing debates regarding the optimal revascularization method, recent retrospective studies and meta-analyses suggest potential benefits of Endovascular Treatment (EVT) over Open Bypass Surgery (OB) in reducing mortality and wound complications, with comparable Amputation-free Survival rates. CONCLUSIONS The selection of revascularization methods in ESRD patients with CLTI is complex, necessitating individualized strategies. The importance of early detection and timely intervention is critical to decelerate disease progression and improve revascularization outcomes. There is a shift in these treatments strategies towards less invasive endovascular procedures, acknowledging the limitations these patients face with open revascularization surgeries. Considering early minor amputations after revascularization could prevent worse consequences, reflecting a shift in the approach to managing CLTI in ESRD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooria Nakhaei
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mohammed Hamouda
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yei KS, Janssen C, Elsayed N, Naazie I, Sedrakyan A, Malas MB. Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy vs transfemoral carotid stenting in a Medicare-matched database. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:826-834.e3. [PMID: 37634620 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is associated with lower risk of perioperative stroke compared with transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. However, there is discrepancy in data regarding long-term outcomes. We aimed to compare long-term outcomes of CEA vs TFCAS using the Medicare-matched Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. METHODS We assessed patients undergoing first-time CEA or TFCAS in Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network from January 2003 to December 2018. Patients with prior history of carotid revascularization, nontransfemoral stenting, stenting performed without distal embolic protection, multiple or nonatherosclerotic lesions, or concomitant procedures were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, any stroke, and a combined end point of death or stroke. We additionally performed propensity score matching and stratification based on symptomatic status. RESULTS A total of 80,146 carotid revascularizations were performed, of which 72,615 were CEA and 7531 were TFCAS. CEA was associated with significantly lower risk of death (57.8% vs 70.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.52; P < .001), stroke (21.3% vs 26.6%; aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69; P < .001) and combined end point of death and stroke (65.3% vs 76.5%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55; P < .001) at 10 years. These findings were reflected in the propensity-matched cohort (combined end point: 34.6% vs 46.8%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.46-0.62) at 4 years, as well as stratified analyses of combined end point by symptomatic status (asymptomatic: 63.2% vs 74.9%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43-0.58; P < .001; symptomatic: 69.9% vs 78.3%; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.45-0.59; P < .001) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS In this analysis of North American real-world data, CEA was associated with greater long-term survival and fewer strokes compared with TFCAS. These findings support the continued use of CEA as the first-line revascularization procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Yei
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Claire Janssen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Isaac Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Art Sedrakyan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Willie-Permor D, Real M, Zarrintan S, Gaffey AC, Malas MB. Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse 30-Day Mortality and Complications After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 101:15-22. [PMID: 38154494 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not uncommon for patients requiring vascular surgery, and in particular aortic surgery, to have increased requirements for blood transfusion. However, studies examining the effects of perioperative transfusion for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are limited. Using large multicenter data, we aimed to study the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on 30-day mortality and complications after TEVAR. METHODS A total of 9,263 patients who underwent TEVAR were included in this retrospective study from the multicenter Vascular Quality Initiative cohort spanning 2010-2022. We excluded patients who were post-traumatic, anemic (World Health Organization criteria: hemoglobin < 12 g/dl and < 13 g/dl for females and males respectively), who underwent open conversions or presented with ruptured aneurysms. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and stroke. Secondary outcomes were postop congestive heart failure (CHF), respiratory complications, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), myocardial infarction (MI) and any postop complications (composite variable). Poisson regression with robust variance was performed to determine the risk of post op outcomes comparing patients who received red blood cells (RBCs) to those who did not. RESULTS Comparing patients without any transfusion (n = 8,223), perioperative transfusion of 1-3 units (n = 735) was associated with 3-fold increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.39,4.57, P < 0.001), almost 2-fold increased risk of stroke (aRR 1.98, 95% CI 1.24,3.15, P = 0.004), 2.7-fold increased risk of SCI (aRR 2.66, 95% CI 1.87-3.77, P < 0.001), 3-fold increased risk of MI (aRR 3.40, 95% CI 2.30, 5.03, P < 0.001), 2-fold increased risk of CHF (aRR 2.04, 95% CI 1.09, 3.83, P = 0.03), 3.5-fold increased risk of respiratory complications (aRR 3.49, 95% CI 2.67, 4.56, P < 0.001), and 2-fold increased risk of any postop complication (aRR 2.36, 95% CI 2.04, 2.73, P < 0.001). These effects were even higher in patients transfused 4 or more units (n = 305) than seen in the effects seen in those transfused 1-3 units; comparing each group to patients who received none. CONCLUSIONS In hemodynamically stable patients undergoing TEVAR for nonemergent/emergent and nontraumatic indications, transfusion of any amount perioperatively is associated with worse 30-day mortality, stroke, SCI, MI, CHF, and respiratory complications. A conservative transfusion approach and multidisciplinary care to identify complications and rescue TEVAR patients who receive any amount of RBCs perioperatively might help improve outcomes. Future studies to understand the mechanisms of outcomes for transfused patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Marcos Real
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Ann C Gaffey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yei KS, Goodney PP, Malas MB. Transparency in our VISION: Author commentary on our Medicare-matched study. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:835-836. [PMID: 38519213 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Yei
- The University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yei KS, Malas MB. Reply. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:984. [PMID: 38519218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Yei
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel RJ, Zarrintan S, Vootukuru NR, Allah SH, Gaffey A, Malas MB. Long-term outcomes in the smoking claudicant after peripheral vascular interventions. J Vasc Surg 2024:S0741-5214(24)00410-5. [PMID: 38432487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Emphasis on tobacco cessation, given the urgent and emergent nature of vascular surgery, is less prevalent than standard elective cases such as hernia repairs, cosmetic surgery, and bariatric procedures. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of active smoking on claudicating individuals undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Our goal is to determine if a greater emphasis on education should be placed on smoking cessation in nonurgent cases scheduled through clinic visits and not the Emergency Department. METHODS This study was performed using the multi-institution de-identified Vascular Quality Initiative/Medicare-linked database (Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network [VISION]). Claudicants who underwent PVI for peripheral arterial occlusive disease between 2004 and 2019 were included in our study. Our final sample consisted of a total of 18,726 patients: 3617 nonsmokers (19.3%) (NSs), 9975 former smokers (53.3%) (FSs), and 5134 current smokers (27.4%) (CSs). We performed propensity score matching on 29 variables (age, gender, race, ethnicity, treatment setting [outpatient or inpatient], obesity, insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, major amputation, inflow treatment, prior bypass or PVI, preoperative medications, level of treatment, concomitant endarterectomy, and treatment type [atherectomy, angioplasty, stent]) between NS vs FS and FS vs CS. Outcomes were long-term (5-year) overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), freedom from reintervention (FR), and amputation-free survival (AFS). RESULTS Propensity score matching resulted in 3160 well-matched pairs of NS and FS and 3750 well-matched pairs of FS and CS. There was no difference between FS and NS in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.09; P = .43), FR (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P = .35), or AFS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.03; P = .12). However, when compared with CS, we found FS to have a higher OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33; P = .01), less FR (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .003), and greater AFS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS This multi-institutional Medicare-linked study looking at elective PVI cases in patients with peripheral artery disease presenting with claudication found that FSs have similar 5-year outcomes in comparison to NSs in terms of OS, FR, and AFS. Additionally, CSs have lower OS and AFS when compared with FSs. Overall, this suggests that smoking claudicants should be highly encouraged and referred to structured smoking cessation programs or even required to stop smoking prior to elective PVI due to the perceived 5-year benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Shatha H Allah
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Ann Gaffey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Willie-Permor D, Rahgozar S, Zarrintan S, Alsaigh T, Gaffey AC, Malas MB. Patients with Prior Exposure to a Combination of Statins & Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-Is)/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) Have Better Outcomes after Carotid Revascularization than Patients with Prior Exposure to Statins Alone: A MultiCenter Analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 100:165-171. [PMID: 37852362 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statin use has been studied and confirmed to have a beneficial impact on perioperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes. The benefits of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) in hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and renal disease are well-known; however, the impact of continuing or withholding ACE-Is/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on CEA and CAS outcomes is not addressed well in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative statin use combined with ACE-Is/ARBs in patients undergoing CEA or CAS on mortality and morbidity using a multi-institutional database. METHODS Using the data of all patients who underwent carotid artery revascularization, including CEA, transcarotid artery revascularization, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting from 2016 to 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative data, we determined as our primary outcome 30-day mortality/stroke after carotid revascularization based on periop exposure to statins alone, or the combination of statins and ACE-Is/ARBs. Secondary outcomes were postop myocardial infarction and postop congestive heart failure. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to determine postop outcomes comparing the combination of statin and ACE-Is/ARBs group with statins alone group. RESULTS A total of 131,285 patients were included in the study, with 59,860 (46%) patients receiving statin only, and 71,425 (54%) receiving both statin and ACE-Is/ARBs preoperatively. Both patient groups differed significantly in preop clinical and demographic characteristics. After adjusting for potential confounders, the statins plus ACE-I/ARB group had a 12% lower risk of postop mortality/stroke (Incident Rate Ratio comparing Statin/ACE group to Statins Only group [IRR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.95, P = 0.001), 18% lower risk of postop congestive heart failure (IRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.98, P = 0.029), and similar risk of postop myocardial infarction (IRR 1.05 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.20, P = 0.54) compared to the statin-only group. CONCLUSION Statins combined with ACE-Is/ARBs perioperatively offer better protection compared to statins alone in patients undergoing carotid revascularization surgery. We recommend the continuation of ACE-Is/ARBs use in patients undergoing carotid revascularization, especially if they have concurrent hypertension. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of adding ACE-Is/ARBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Willie-Permor
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Shima Rahgozar
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Tom Alsaigh
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Ann C Gaffey
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research(CLEVER), University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mota L, Wang SX, Cronenwett JL, Nolan BW, Malas MB, Schermerhorn ML, Liang P. Association of stroke or death with severity of carotid lesion calcification in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:305-315.e3. [PMID: 37913944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for heavily calcified lesions is controversial due to concern for stent failure and increased perioperative stroke risk. However, the degree to which calcification affects outcomes is poorly understood, particularly in transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). With the precipitous increase in TCAR use and its expansion to standard surgical-risk patients, we aimed to determine the impact of lesion calcification on CAS outcomes to ensure its safe and appropriate use. METHODS We identified patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent first-time transfemoral CAS (tfCAS) and TCAR between 2016 and 2021. Patients were stratified into groups based on degree of lesion calcification: no calcification, 1% to 50% calcification, 51% to 99% calcification, and 100% circumferential calcification or intraluminal protrusion. Outcomes included in-hospital and 1-year composite stroke/death, as well as individual stroke, death, and myocardial infarction outcomes. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between degree of calcification and these outcomes. RESULTS Among 21,860 patients undergoing CAS, 28% patients had no calcification, 34% had 1% to 50% calcification, 35% had 51% to 99% calcification, and 3% had 100% circumferential calcification/protrusion. Patients with 51% to 99% and circumferential calcification/protrusion had higher odds of in-hospital stroke/death (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.6; P = .034; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .004, respectively) compared with those with no calcification. Circumferential calcification was also associated with increased risk for in-hospital myocardial infarction (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.0; P = .003). In tfCAS patients, only circumferential calcification/protrusion was associated with higher in-hospital stroke/death odds (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; P = .013), whereas for TCAR patients, 51% to 99% calcification was associated with increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .025). At 1 year, circumferential calcification/protrusion was associated with higher odds of ipsilateral stroke/death (12.4% vs 6.6%; hazard ratio, 1.64; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing CAS, there is an increased risk of in-hospital stroke/death for lesions with >50% calcification or circumferential/protruding plaques. Increasing severity of carotid lesion calcification is a significant risk factor for stroke/death in patients undergoing CAS, regardless of approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Mota
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Sophie X Wang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jack L Cronenwett
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Brian W Nolan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Patric Liang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Solomon Y, Conroy PD, Rastogi V, Yadavalli SD, Schneider PA, Wang GJ, Malas MB, de Borst GJ, Schermerhorn ML. Outcomes following carotid revascularization for stroke stratified by Modified Rankin Scale and time of intervention. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:287-296.e1. [PMID: 38179993 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS. METHODS We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate. RESULTS We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoel Solomon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick D Conroy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sai Divya Yadavalli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter A Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Grace J Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chow CY, Zarrintan S, Willie-Permor D, Elsayed NSS, Baril DT, Malas MB. Postoperative Outcomes and One-Year Mortality of Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation Medications Undergoing Infrainguinal Bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99:201-208. [PMID: 37802142 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.07.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients requiring open infrainguinal bypass (IIB) frequently are taking chronic anticoagulation (AC) medications. Taking these medications in the preoperative setting may affect the outcomes of surgery. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes and 1-year mortality of patients taking chronic AC medications that undergo IIB. METHODS Using data obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative from January 2011 to October 2021, patients on warfarin or any direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) within 30 days of IIB were compared with patients not taking chronic AC medications. The primary outcomes were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcomes included total procedure time, need for perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion, prolonged length of hospital stay, postoperative myocardial infarction or stroke, and graft patency at discharge. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients taking warfarin with those taking DOACs. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan Meier survival, and Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the data for postoperative and 1-year outcomes, respectively. RESULTS A total of 55,076 patients underwent IIB during the study period, and 11,547 (20.97%) were on chronic AC prior to surgery. The 2 cohorts differed significantly in almost every demographic and clinical characteristic. Multivariate analyses adjusting for 45 potential confounders revealed that there was no significant difference in in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. The total procedure time for the chronic AC cohort was on average 11.46 ± 2.16 min longer (P ≤ 0.001) and there was a greater risk of prolonged length of stay in the hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.26, P < 0.001). These patients also returned to the operating room (OR) at a greater rate (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19; P = 0.016) and demonstrated a significantly lower rate of graft patency at discharge (aOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.86, P = 0.001). On subgroup analysis, multivariate analysis demonstrated lower 30-day mortality for the DOAC group in comparison to the warfarin group (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.94, P = 0.015), but no significant differences in in-hospital and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS Patients taking AC medications within 30 days prior to IIBs may require more perioperative red blood cell transfusions, longer hospitalizations, and return to the OR at a greater rate. They are also at an increased risk for loss of graft patency at discharge. However, these patients are not at increased risk of in-hospital, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. IIB can, therefore, be performed safely in patients taking chronic AC medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Y Chow
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nadin Samy Sedik Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Donald T Baril
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patel RJ, Sibona A, Malas MB, Al-Nouri O, Lane JS, Barleben AR. A Single-Institution Case Series of Total Endovascular Relining for Type 3 Endoleaks in Traditional Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Grafts with Raised Bifurcations. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99:332-340. [PMID: 37839654 PMCID: PMC10872593 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be performed with a wide variety of devices. Many of these grafts elevate the aortic bifurcation which can limit future repairs if the graft material fails thereby creating a type III endoleak to aorto-uniliac grafts. Many manufacturers have grafts susceptible to this, but we have seen this in the Medtronic AneuRx graft. Our goal is to provide technical details and outcomes regarding a novel technique to reline these grafts while maintaining inline flow to the iliac arteries. METHODS This was a single-institution review of patients who had endoleaks requiring intervention after a previously placed graft with an elevated aortic bifurcation. Primary outcomes included technical success defined as placement of all planned devices, resolution of type III endoleak, aneurysm size at follow-up, and requirement of reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications, aneurysm-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. Technical details of the operation include back-table deployment of an Ovation device, modification of the deployment system tether and pre-emptive placement of an up and over 0.014″ wire. The wire is placed up and over and hung outside the contralateral gate. Once the main body is introduced above the old graft, the 0.014" is snared from the contralateral side and externalized. The main body is then able to be seated at the bifurcation as the limb is not fully deployed and then device deployment is completed per instructions for use. RESULTS Our study consists of 4 individuals, 3 of which had an abdominal aortic aneurysm initially managed with an AneuRx endovascular aneurysm repair and 1 with a combination of Gore and Cook grafts. All 4 patients were male with an average age of 84.5 years at time of reline. All patients had at least 10 years between initial surgery and reline at our institution. Primary outcomes revealed no type 1 or 3 endoleaks at follow-up, technical success was 100% and 1 patient required reintervention for aneurysm growth and type 2 endoleak. In terms of our secondary outcomes, there was 1 postoperative complication which was cardiac dysfunction secondary to demand ischemia, aneurysm-related mortality was 0% and all-cause mortality was 25% at average follow-up of 2.44 years. CONCLUSIONS As individuals continue to age, there are more patients who would benefit from less invasive reinterventions following endovascular aneurysm repair. Whether this is due to aortic degeneration, stent migration, or stent material damage is not always known. In this study, we present an endovascular approach to treating type III endoleak patients with a previous graft and elevated aortic bifurcation using Ovation stent grafts and found no evidence of type 1 or 3 endoleaks on follow-up imaging. This approach may allow patients with type III endoleak the option of a minimally invasive, percutaneous approach where they previously would not have had one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Agustin Sibona
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Turner MA, Mathlouthi A, Patel RJ, Perreault M, Malas MB, Al-Nouri O. Small Arteriovenous Anastomosis in Fistula Creation: Establishing a Functional Vascular Access while Minimizing Steal Syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99:142-147. [PMID: 37926140 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The size selection of the arteriovenous (AV) anastomosis in dialysis access creation requires a careful balance: the diameter must be large enough to accommodate sufficient flow for hemodialysis but small enough to minimize the complication of steal syndrome. Steal syndrome affects up to 10% of patients after creation of dialysis access with sometimes devastating consequences. Conventional teaching recommends a 7-10 mm anastomosis. We sought to assess the efficacy of using a smaller (5-6 mm) anastomosis in new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. METHODS We conducted a comparative retrospective analysis of patients who underwent fistula creation with a small versus regular size anastomosis at any upper extremity anatomic site between March 2019 and October 2020 at our institution. Anatomic sites included radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, and brachiobasilic. All AV anastomoses were measured intraoperatively to be 5-6 mm in diameter for the small size groups and 8-10 mm for the regular size group. Endpoints included steal syndrome, functional patency, primary patency, and secondary patency. RESULTS Out of 110 patients who underwent an AVF creation, 59.1% received a 5-6 mm anastomosis with a median follow-up time of 10 ± 6 months. Patients' demographics and comorbidities were relatively similar between the 2 groups except for a higher rate of hyperlipidemia (55.4% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.008) in the small size group. Patients in the small size group were more likely to undergo a radiocephalic fistula (40% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001) and to have a smaller mean vein diameter on preoperative duplex ultrasound (3.2±1 mm vs. 3.9±1 mm, P = 0.0016) when compared to their regular size counterparts. During follow-up, none of the patients in the small group developed steal syndrome (0% vs. 9%, P = 0.015). At 1 year, patients in the regular size group achieved higher rates of primary patency (67.9% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.02); however, no difference was seen in 1-year primary-assisted patency (84.9% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.3), secondary patency (89.6% vs. 79.5%, P = 0.3), or functional patency (87.7% vs. 82.2%, P = 0.64) between the small and regular size groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The use of a 5-6 mm anastomosis in the creation of new AVFs of the upper extremities appears to be a technically safe option for dialysis access. Our experience suggests that smaller anastomosis still creates enough flow to maintain a functional AV access while minimizing the incidence of steal syndrome. Additionally, even with smaller vein sizes preoperative, adequate dialysis access can be created via a small sized anastomosis, including distal arm access. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of small anastomosis fistulas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Turner
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Asma Mathlouthi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mark Perreault
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mohnot J, Wang Y(G, Yin K, Malas MB, Edwards NM, Dobrilovic N, Zhan Y. Changes in treatment patterns of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States. JTCVS Open 2023; 16:48-65. [PMID: 38204709 PMCID: PMC10775055 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Background The introduction of endovascular repair provides an alternative to traditional open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Its utility is not well defined, however. Using a national database, we studied the treatment patterns and outcomes of TAAA to gain insight into its contemporary surgical practice in the United States. Methods Records of TAAA patients who received endovascular and open repair were retrieved from the 2002 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample database. Each cohort was stratified into 4 age groups: ≤50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and >70 years. Patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 repair modalities. Temporal trends were investigated. Results Endovascular repair use increased steadily, whereas open repair volume remained stable until 2012, before declining by 50% by 2018. This appears to be associated with a declining number of open repairs in patients age >60 years. Patients who underwent endovascular repair were older and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean, 2.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.5 ± 1.5; P < .001) but lower in-hospital mortality (mean, 8.9% vs 17.1%; P < .001), shorter length of stay (mean, 10.1 ± 12.2 days vs 17.1 ± 17.4 days; P < .001), and fewer postoperative complications. A difference in mortality between open and endovascular repair was observed for patients age >60 years but not for patients age ≤60 years. Conclusions There has been a shift in the treatment of TAAA in the United States from open repair-dominant to endovascular repair-dominant. It has increased surgical access for older and more comorbid patients and has led to a decline in the use of open repair while lowering in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Mohnot
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| | - Yunda (George) Wang
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| | - Kanhua Yin
- Department of Surgery, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Mo
| | - Mahmoud B. Malas
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| | - Niloo M. Edwards
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
| | - Nikola Dobrilovic
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, Ill
| | - Yong Zhan
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Naazie IN, Willie-Permor D, Haykal T, Harris LM, Hughes K, Malas MB. Association Between Conduit Type and Outcomes After Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms. J Surg Res 2023; 291:670-676. [PMID: 37562228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies have demonstrated acceptable midterm outcomes with prosthetic conduits for above-knee bypass for occlusive disease in patients with inadequate segment great saphenous vein (GSV). In this study we aimed to investigate whether this holds true for open repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). METHODS We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative data for patients who underwent open PAA repair (OPAR). We divided the cohort into three groups based on the conduit used: GSV, other autologous veins, or prosthetic graft. Study outcomes included primary patency, freedom from major amputation, amputation-free survival, and overall survival at 1 y. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to compare outcomes between study groups. RESULTS A total of 4016 patients underwent bypass for PAA from January 2010 to October 2021. The three cohorts were significantly different in many demographic and clinical characteristics. The adjusted odds of postoperative amputation among symptomatic patients were 3-fold higher for prosthetic conduits compared to the GSV (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.72-5.92; P < 0.001). For the 1-y outcomes, the adjusted risk of major amputation was almost 3-fold higher for patients with symptomatic disease undergoing bypass with prosthetic conduits (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; 95% CI, 1.35-6.52; P = 0.007). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with 96% increased risk of death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96; 95% CI, 1.29-2.97; P = 0.002) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.37-1.87; P = 0.652). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with a 2-fold increased risk of 1-y major amputation or death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94; P < 0.001) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.98; P = 0.816). Comparing bypass with other veins to the GSV among patients with symptomatic disease, there was no statistically significant difference in major amputation risk (HR; 2.44; 95% CI, 0.55-10.82; P = 0.242) and no difference in the adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.26-2.44; P = 0.653). There were no differences in the adjusted risk of loss of primary patency comparing other veins to GSV (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.85-2.76; P = 0.154) and prosthetic conduits to GSV (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.26; P = 0.422). CONCLUSIONS This large study shows that among patients undergoing OPAR, 1-y primary patency does not differ between conduit types. However, prosthetic conduits are associated with significantly higher risk of amputation and death compared to GSV among symptomatic patients. Though non-GSV autologous veins are less often used for OPAR, they have comparably acceptable outcomes as GSV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac N Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Tony Haykal
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Linda M Harris
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Kakra Hughes
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel RJ, Sibona A, Malas MB, Lane JS, Al-Nouri O, Barleben AR. Upper Extremity Access Has Worse Outcomes in F/BEVAR Using the VQI Dataset. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 97:184-191. [PMID: 37574045 PMCID: PMC10841218 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physician-modified endografts and custom-manufactured devices use branched and fenestrated techniques (F/BEVAR) to repair complex aneurysms. Traditionally, many of these are deployed through a combination of upper and lower extremity access. However, with newer steerable sheaths, you can now simulate upper extremity (UEM) access from a transfemoral approach. Single-institution studies have demonstrated increased risks of access site complications and stroke when UEM access is used. This study compares outcomes after F/BEVAR in a national database between total transfemoral (TTF) access and mixed UEM access. METHODS This study is an analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative for all patients who underwent F/BEVAR from 2014 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on a TTF delivery of all devices versus any UEM access for deployment of target vessel stents. Primary outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and perioperative death. Secondary outcomes included access site hematoma, occlusion or embolization, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and technical success. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Three thousand one hundred forty six patients underwent an F/BEVAR: 2,309 (73.4%) TTF and 837 (26.6%) UEM. Logistic regression analysis indicated a two-fold increased risk of death and MI and a three-fold increased risk of stroke in the UEM group. Furthermore, there is decreased operative time (221 vs. 297 min, P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (62 vs. 80 min, P < 0.001) in the TTF group and no difference in technical success between groups (96% vs. 97%, P = 0.159). Finally, there was a decrease in access site hematoma 2.54% vs. 4.31% (P = 0.013), access site occlusion 0.61% vs. 1.91% (P = 0.001), and extremity embolization 2.17% vs. 3.58% (P = 0.026) in the TTF versus UEM group. CONCLUSIONS This study using Vascular Quality Initiative data demonstrates that patients who undergo an F/BEVAR using UEM access have an increased risk of perioperative MI, death, and stroke compared to TTF access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Agustin Sibona
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zarrintan S, Elsayed N, Patel RJ, Clary B, Goodney PP, Malas MB. Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Three Years Survival of Trans Carotid Artery Revascularization Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative Medicare-Linked Database. Ann Surg 2023; 278:559-567. [PMID: 37436847 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the gold standard procedure for carotid revascularization. Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) was introduced as a minimally invasive alternative procedure in patients who are at high risk for surgery. However, TFCAS was associated with an increased risk of stroke and death compared to CEA. BACKGROUND Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has outperformed TFCAS in several prior studies and has shown similar perioperative and 1-year outcomes compared with CEA. We aimed to compare the 1-year and 3-year outcomes of TCAR versus CEA in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-Medicare-Linked [Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION)] database. METHODS The VISION database was queried for all patients undergoing CEA and TCAR between September 2016 to December 2019. The primary outcome was 1-year and 3-year survival. One-to-one propensity-score matching (PSM) without replacement was used to produce 2 well-matched cohorts. Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox regression was used for analyses. Exploratory analyses compared stroke rates using claims-based algorithms for comparison. RESULTS A total of 43,714 patients underwent CEA and 8089 patients underwent TCAR during the study period. Patients in the TCAR cohort were older and were more likely to have severe comorbidities. PSM produced two well-matched cohorts of 7351 pairs of TCAR and CEA. In the matched cohorts, there were no differences in 1-year death [hazard ratio (HR)=1.13; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30; P =0.065]. At 3-years, TCAR was associated with slight increased risk of death (HR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P =0.008). When stratifying by initial symptomatic presentation, the increased 3-year death associated with TCAR persisted only in symptomatic patients (HR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.08-1.63; P =0.008). Exploratory analyses of postoperative stroke rates using administrative sources suggested that validated measures of claims-based stroke ascertainment are necessary. CONCLUSIONS In this large multi-institutional PSM analysis with robust Medicare-linked follow-up for survival analysis, the rate of death at 1 year was similar in TCAR and CEA regardless of symptomatic status. The slight increase in the risk of 3-year death in symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR is likely confounded by more severe comorbidities despite matching. A randomized controlled trial comparing TCAR to CEA is necessary to further determine the role of TCAR in standard-risk patients requiring carotid revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Rohini J Patel
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Bryan Clary
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patel RJ, Willie-Permor D, Zarrintan S, Elsayed N, Al-Nouri O, Malas MB. Two-Stage Offers No Advantages over Single-Stage Arteriovenous Creation: An Analysis of Multicenter National Data. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 96:308-315. [PMID: 37004922 PMCID: PMC10527688 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditionally, arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) involving the basilic vein (BV) have been created in 1 or 2 stages to allow time for the vein to enlarge before superficialization for potential better fistula maturation. Previous single institution studies and meta-analyses have found conflicting outcomes between single-stage and 2-stage procedures. Our study aims to use a large national database to assess the difference in outcomes between single-stage and 2-stage procedures for dialysis access. METHODS We studied all patients undergoing BV AVF creation in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2011 to 2021. Patients were split into single-stage or a planned 2-stage procedure for dialysis access. Primary outcomes included dialysis use with index fistula, maturity rate, and number of days from surgery to fistula use. Secondary outcomes included patency (defined by physical exam or imaging on follow-up), 30-day mortality, and postoperative complications (bleeding, steal syndrome, thrombosis, or neuropathy). Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between staged dialysis access procedures and primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 22,910 individuals of which 7,077 (30.9%) had a 2-staged dialysis access procedure and 15,833 (69.1%) had a single-staged procedure. Average follow-up was 345 days in the single stage and 420 days for 2-stage. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the 2 groups in terms of medical comorbidities. Primary outcomes were significant for more patients in the 2-stage group undergoing dialysis with the index fistula compared to single stage (31.5% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.0001), significant decrease in days to use in current dialysis patients (103.9 days single stage versus 141.0 days 2-stage, P < 0.0001), and no difference in maturity at follow-up (19.3% single-stage and 17.4% 2-stage, P = 0.354). Secondary outcomes revealed no difference in 30-day mortality or patency (89.8% single-stage and 89.1% 2-stage, P = 0.383), but a significant difference in postoperative complications with a 2-stage procedure compared to 1-stage (1.6% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.026). Finally, a spline model was used to determine that a preoperative vein of 3 mm or less could be a cutoff in which a 2-stage procedure might be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that when dialysis access fistulas are created using the BV, there is no difference in maturity rate or 1-year patency when assessing single-stage versus 2-stage procedures. However, 2-stage procedures significantly delay the time of first use of the fistula and increase postoperative complications. Therefore, we suggest performing single stage procedures when the vein is of appropriate diameter to minimize multiple procedures, complications and expedite time to maturity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Levin SR, Farber A, Goodney PP, King EG, Eslami MH, Malas MB, Patel VI, Kiang SC, Siracuse JJ. Five Year Survival in Medicare Patients Undergoing Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Linked Registry Claims Data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:541-549. [PMID: 37543356 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To justify the up front risks of offering elective interventions for intermittent claudication (IC), patients should have reasonable life expectancy to derive durable clinical benefits. Open surgery for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is maximally beneficial in patients surviving ≥ 2 years. The aim was to assess long term survival after IC and CLTI interventions. METHODS In a retrospective cohort analysis, the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry from 1 January 2010 to 31 May 2021 was queried for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), infra-inguinal bypasses (IIB), and supra-inguinal bypasses (SIB) for IC and CLTI across 286 US centres. VQI linkage to Medicare insurance claims provided five year survival data. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with five year mortality. RESULTS There were 31 457 PVIs (44.7% IC, 55.3% CLTI), 7 978 IIBs (26.9% IC, 73.1% CLTI), and 2 149 SIBs (50.1% IC, 49.9% CLTI) recorded in the VQI. Among the PVI, IIB, and SIB cohorts, average ages were 75, 73, and 72 years, respectively. Respective five year mortality after PVI for IC and CLTI was 37.2% and 71.1%; after IIB for IC and CLTI it was 37.8% and 60%; and after SIB for IC and CLTI it was 33.8% and 53.8%. On multivariable analysis, across all procedures, end stage renal disease, CLTI, congestive heart failure, anaemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and prior amputation were independently associated with increased mortality. Pre-admission home living and pre-operative aspirin use were independently associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSION Long term survival in Medicare patients undergoing interventions in VQI centres for peripheral arterial disease is poor. Two thirds of CLTI patients and over one third of IC patients were not alive at five years. Intervening for IC in patients with high mortality risk should be avoided. For CLTI patients identified with decreased survival likelihood, intervention durability may be less important than invasiveness. Pre-operative medical optimisation should always be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott R Levin
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alik Farber
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Elizabeth G King
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohammad H Eslami
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, NYP/Columbia University Irving Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sharon C Kiang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Centre, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patel RJ, Zarrintan S, Jagadeesh V, Vootukuru NR, Gaffey A, Malas MB. Long-term outcomes after lower extremity bypass in the actively smoking claudicant. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:1003-1011. [PMID: 37327952 PMCID: PMC10528269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Smoking is known to increase complications, including poor wound healing, coagulation abnormalities, and cardiac and pulmonary ramifications. Across specialties, elective surgical procedures are commonly denied to active smokers. Given the base population of active smokers with vascular disease, smoking cessation is encouraged but is not required the way it is for elective general surgery procedures. We aim to study the outcomes of elective lower extremity bypass (LEB) in actively smoking claudicants. METHODS We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network LEB database from 2003 to 2019. In this database we found 609 (10.0%) never smokers (NS), 3388 (55.3%) former smokers (FS), and 2123 (34.7%) current smokers (CS) who underwent LEB for claudication. We performed two separate propensity score matches without replacement on 36 clinical variables (age, gender, race, ethnicity, obesity, insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, major amputation, inflow treatment, preoperative medications and treatment type), one of FS to NS and a second analysis of CS to FS. Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), freedom from reintervention (FR), and amputation-free survival (AFS). RESULTS Propensity score matches resulted in 497 well-matched pairs of NS and FS. In this analysis we found no difference in terms of OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.70-1.24; P = .61), LS (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.82; P = .80), FR (HR, 0.9; 95% CI,0.71-1.21; P = .59), or AFS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI,0.71-1.22; P = .62). In the second analysis, we had 1451 well-matched pairs of CS and FS. There was no difference in LS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI,0.94-1.97; P = .11) or FR (HR, 1.02; 95% CI,0.88-1.19; P = .76). However, we did find a significant increase in OS (HR, 1.37; 95% CI,1.15-1.64, P <.001) and AFS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI,1.18-1.62; P < .001) in FS compared with CS. CONCLUSIONS Claudicants represent a unique nonemergent vascular patient population that may require LEB. Our study found that FS have better OS and AFS when compared with CS. Additionally, FS mimic nonsmokers at 5-year outcomes for OS, LS, FR, and AFS. Therefore, structured smoking cessation should be a more prominent part of vascular office visits before elective LEB procedures in claudicants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Vasan Jagadeesh
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ann Gaffey
- Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ramirez JL, Govsyeyev N, Sorber R, Iannuzzi JC, Schanzer AS, Hicks CW, Malas MB, Zarkowsky DS. Proximal Instructions for Use Violations in Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative: Retrospective Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:633-643. [PMID: 37288832 PMCID: PMC10788874 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often attempted in patients with marginal anatomy. These patients' midterm outcomes are available in the Vascular Quality Initiative for analysis. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in the Vascular Quality Initiative from patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR between 2011 and 2018. Each EVAR was identified as either on- or off-instructions for use (IFU) based on aortic neck criteria. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, and type Ia endoleak with IFU status. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event models estimated reintervention, aneurysm sac enlargement, and overall survival. RESULTS We identified 5,488 patients with at least 1 follow-up recorded. Those treated off-IFU included 1,236 patients ([23%] mean follow-up 401 days) compared with 4,252 (77%) treated on-IFU (mean follow-up 406 days). There was no evidence of significant differences in crude 30-day survival (96% vs 97%; p = 0.28) or estimated 2-year survival (97% vs 97%; log-rank p = 0.28). Crude type Ia endoleak frequency was greater in patients treated off IFU (2% vs 1%; p = 0.03). Off-IFU EVAR was associated with type Ia endoleak on multivariable regression model (odds ratio 1.84 [95% CI 1.23 to 2.76]; p = 0.003). Patients treated off IFU vs on IFU experienced had increased risk of reintervention within 2 years (7% vs 5%; log-rank p = 0.02), a finding consistent with results from the Cox modeling (hazard ratio 1.38 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.81]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated off IFU were at greater risk for type Ia endoleak and reintervention, although they had similar 2-year survival compared with those treated on IFU. Patients with anatomy outside IFU should be considered for open surgery or complex endovascular repair to reduce the probability for revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel L Ramirez
- From the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Ramirez, Zarkowsky)
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA (Rmairez)
| | | | - Rebecca Sorber
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Sorber, Hicks)
| | | | - Andres S Schanzer
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA (Schanzer)
| | - Caitlin W Hicks
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Sorber, Hicks)
| | | | - Devin S Zarkowsky
- From the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Ramirez, Zarkowsky)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zarrintan S, Malas MB. What Is the Role of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization? Adv Surg 2023; 57:115-140. [PMID: 37536848 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold-standard method of carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients with ≥50% and in asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) has been associated with higher perioperative stroke rates compared to CEA in several studies. On the other hand, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has outperformed TFCAS in patients who are considered high risk for surgery. There is increasing data that supports TCAR as a safe and efficient technique with outcomes similar to those of CEA, but additional level-one studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term outcomes of TCAR in high- and standard-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Altman Center for Clinical and Translational Research, 9452 Medical Center Drive - LL2W 502A, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular & Endovascular Research (CLEVER), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; Altman Center for Clinical and Translational Research, 9452 Medical Center Drive - LL2W 502A, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patel RJ, Cui C, Khan MA, Willie-Permor D, Malas MB. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Open Versus Endovascular Revascularization for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 94:347-355. [PMID: 36878356 PMCID: PMC10475492 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown a trend supporting endovascular revascularization (ER) in the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). However, few studies have compared the cost effectiveness of ER and open revascularization (OR) for this indication. The purpose of this study is to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing open versus ER for CMI. METHODS We built a Markov model with Monte Carlo microsimulation using transition probabilities and utilities from existing literature for CMI patients undergoing OR versus ER. Costs were derived from the hospital perspective using the 2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. The model randomized 20,000 patients to either OR or ER and allowed for 1 subsequent reintervention with 3 other intervening health states: alive, alive with complications, and dead. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were analyzed over a 5-year period. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to study the impact of parameter variability on cost effectiveness. RESULTS OR cost $4,532 for 1.03 QALYs while ER cost $5,092 for 1.21 QALYs, leading to an ICER of $3,037 per QALY gained in the ER arm. This ICER was less than our willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that our model was most sensitive to costs, mortality, and patency rates after OR and ER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated ER would be considered cost effective 99% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS This study found that while 5-year costs for ER were greater than OR, ER afforded greater QALYs than OR. Although ER is associated with lower long-term patency and higher rates of reintervention, it appears to be more cost effective than OR for the treatment of CMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Christina Cui
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Duke Health Systems, Durham, NC
| | - Maryam Ali Khan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Elsayed N, Gaffey AC, Abou-Zamzam A, Malas MB. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Are Associated With Favorable Outcomes Compared to Beta Blockers in Reducing Mortality Following Abdominal Aneurysm Repair. J Am Heart Assoc 2023:e029761. [PMID: 37449564 PMCID: PMC10382116 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.029761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Background The best medical therapy to control hypertension following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is yet to be determined. We therefore examined whether treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) versus beta blockers influenced postoperative and 1-year clinical end points following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a Medicare-linked database. Methods and Results All patients with hypertension undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair and open aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database between 2003 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their preoperative and discharge medications, either RAASIs or beta blockers. Our cohort included 8789 patients, of whom 3523 (40.1%) were on RAASIs, and 5266 (59.9%) were on beta blockers. After propensity score matching, there were 3053 matched pairs of patients in each group. After matching, RAASI use was associated with lower risk of postoperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.6]), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.03-0.6]), and nonhome discharge (OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]). Before propensity score matching, RAASI use was associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4 [95% CI, 0.4-0.5]) and lower risk of aneurysmal rupture (HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]). These results persisted after propensity score matching for mortality (HR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.4-0.5]) and aneurysmal rupture (HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]). Conclusions In this large contemporary retrospective cohort study, RAASI use was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes compared with beta blockers. It was also associated with lower mortality and aneurysmal rupture at 1 year of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
| | - Ann C Gaffey
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
| | - Ahmed Abou-Zamzam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery Loma Linda University Medical Center Loma Linda CA USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liang P, Cronenwett JL, Secemsky EA, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Malas MB, Wang GJ, Nolan BW, Kashyap VS, Motaganahalli RL, Schermerhorn ML. Risk of Stroke, Death, and Myocardial Infarction Following Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients With Standard Surgical Risk. JAMA Neurol 2023; 80:437-444. [PMID: 36939697 PMCID: PMC10028539 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Carotid artery stenting has been limited to use in patients with high surgical risk; outcomes in patients with standard surgical risk are not well known. Objective To compare stroke, death, and myocardial infarction outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization vs carotid endarterectomy in patients with standard surgical risk. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study was conducted from August 2016 to August 2019 with follow-up until August 31, 2020, using data from the multicenter Vascular Quality Initiative Carotid Artery Stent and Carotid Endarterectomy registries. Patients with standard surgical risk, defined as those lacking Medicare-defined high medical or surgical risk characteristics and undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization (n = 2962) or carotid endarterectomy (n = 35 063) for atherosclerotic carotid disease. In total, 760 patients were excluded for treatment of multiple lesions or in conjunction with other procedures. Exposures Transcarotid artery revascularization vs carotid endarterectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite end point of 30-day stroke, death, or myocardial infarction or 1-year ipsilateral stroke. Results After 1:3 matching, 2962 patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization (mean [SD] age, 70.4 [6.9] years; 1910 [64.5%] male) and 8886 undergoing endarterectomy (mean [SD] age, 70.0 [6.5] years; 5777 [65.0%] male) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of the primary composite end point between the 2 cohorts (transcarotid 3.0% vs endarterectomy 2.6%; absolute difference, 0.40% [95% CI, -0.43% to 1.24%]; relative risk [RR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.50]; P = .34). Transcarotid artery revascularization was associated with a higher risk of 1-year ipsilateral stroke (1.6% vs 1.1%; absolute difference, 0.52% [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.08]; RR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.11%]; P = .02) but no difference in 1-year all-cause mortality (2.6% vs 2.5%; absolute difference, -0.13% [95% CI, -0.18% to 0.33%]; RR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.39]; P = .67). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, the risk of 30-day stroke, death, or myocardial infarction or 1-year ipsilateral stroke was similar in patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization compared with those undergoing endarterectomy for carotid stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patric Liang
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jack L. Cronenwett
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Eric A. Secemsky
- Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland
| | - Mahmoud B. Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego
| | - Grace J. Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Brian W. Nolan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland
| | - Vikram S. Kashyap
- Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Raghu L. Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Marc L. Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Haywood NS, Ratcliffe SJ, Zheng X, Mao J, Farivar BS, Tracci MC, Malas MB, Goodney PP, Clouse WD. Operative and long-term outcomes of combined and staged carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1424-1433.e1. [PMID: 36681256 PMCID: PMC10353412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Optimal temporal surgical management of significant carotid stenosis and coronary artery disease remains unknown. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass (CABG) are performed concurrently (CCAB) or in a staged (CEA-CABG or CABG-CEA) approach. Using the Vascular Quality Initiative-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Coordinated Registry Network-Medicare-linked dataset, this study compared operative and long-term outcomes after CCAB and staged approaches. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Coordinated Registry Network dataset was used to identify CEAs from 2011 to 2018 with combined CABG or CABG within 45 days preceding or after CEA. Patients were stratified based on concurrent or staged approach. Primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, stroke and death as composite (SD) and all as composite within 30 days from the last procedure as well as in the long term. Univariate analysis and risk-adjusted analysis using inverse propensity weighting were performed. Kaplan-Meier curves of stroke, MI, and death were created and compared. RESULTS There were 1058 patients included: 643 CCAB and 415 staged (309 CEA-CABG and 106 CABG-CEA). Compared with staged patients, those undergoing CCAB had a higher preoperative rate of congestive heart failure (24.8% vs 18.4%; P = .01) and decreased renal function (14.9% vs 8.5%; P < .01), as well as fewer prior neurological events (23.5% vs 31.4%; P < .01). Patients undergoing CCAB had similar weighted rate of 30-day stroke (4.6% vs 4.1%; P = .72), death (7.0% vs 5.0%; P = .32), and composite outcomes (stroke and death, 9.8% vs 8.5%; P = .56; stroke, death, and MI, 14.7% vs 17.4%; P = .31), but a lower weighted rate of MI (5.5% vs 11.5%; P < .01) vs the staged cohort. Long-term adjusted risks of stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.36; P = .51) and mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.76-1.36; P=.91) were similar between groups, but higher risk of MI long-term was seen in those staged (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.08; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing CCAB or staged open revascularization for carotid stenosis and coronary artery disease, the staged approach had an increased risk of postoperative cardiac event, but the short- and long-term rates of stroke and mortality seem to be comparable. Adverse cardiovascular event risk is high between operations when staged and should be a consideration when selecting an approach. Although factors leading to staged sequencing performance need further clarity, CCAB seems to be safe and should be considered an equally reasonable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan S Haywood
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Sarah J Ratcliffe
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Xinyan Zheng
- Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jialin Mao
- Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Behzad S Farivar
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Margaret C Tracci
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - W Darrin Clouse
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Elsayed N, Chow C, Ramachandran M, Al-Nouri O, Motaganahalli RL, Malas MB. Hemodynamic Instability Predicts In-Hospital and One-Year Mortality After TransCarotid Artery Revascularization and TransFemoral Carotid Stenting. J Vasc Surg 2023:S0741-5214(23)00548-7. [PMID: 37019157 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Blood pressure fluctuations are a common hemodynamic alteration following carotid artery stenting either with transfemoral (TFCAS) or transcarotid (TCAR) approach and are thought to be related to alteration in baroreceptor function due to angioplasty and stent expansion. These fluctuations are particularly worrisome in the high-risk patient population referred for CAS. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients who required the administration of intravenous blood pressure medication (IVBPmed) for hypotension or hypertension after CAS. METHODS All patients undergoing carotid revascularization in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database between 2016-2021 were included. we compared outcomes of patients who required postoperative IVBPmed to treat hyper- or hypotension with normotensive patients. In-hospital outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression. One-year outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS We identified 38,510 patients undergoing CAS (57.7% TCAR and 42.3% TFCAS), of which, 30% received IVBPmed for treatment of either postoperative hypertension (12.6%) or hypotension (16.4%). In multivariable analysis, postoperative hypotension was associated with a higher risk of stroke, death, or MI (OR: 3.1, 95%CI (2.6-3.6), P<.001), stroke or death (OR: 2.9, 95%CI (2.4-3.5), P<.001), stroke (OR: 2.6, 95%CI (2.1-3.2), P<.001), death (OR: 3.5, 95%CI (2.6-4.8), P<.001), MI (OR: 4.7, 95%CI (3.3-6.7), P<.001), and bleeding (OR: 1.96, 95%CI (1.4-2.7), P<.001) compared to normotensive patients. Postoperative hypertension was associated with a higher risk of stroke, death, or MI (3.6, 95%CI (3-4.4), P<.001), stroke or death (OR: 3.3, 95%CI (2.7-4.1), P<.001), stroke (OR: 3.7, 95%CI (3-4.7), P<.001), death (OR: 2.7, 95%CI (1.9-3.9), P<.001), MI (OR: 5.7, 95%CI (3.9-8.3), P<.001), and bleeding (OR: 1.9, 95%CI (1.4-2.7), P<.001) compared to normotensive patients. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative hypertension or hypotension requiring IVBPmed after CAS is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital stroke, death, MI, and bleeding. Postoperative hypertension is associated with worse survival at one year. This study indicates that the need for IVBPmed after CAS is not benign, therefore, these patients necessitate aggressive perioperative medical management and safe techniques to avoid hypo and hypertension. Close follow-up and continue medical management is needed to maximize these patients' survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Christopher Chow
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Mokhshan Ramachandran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Patel RJ, Lee AM, Hallsten J, Lane JS, Barleben AR, Malas MB. Use of surgical augmented intelligence maps can reduce radiation and improve safety in the endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:982-990.e2. [PMID: 36581011 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The introduction of endovascular procedures has revolutionized the management of complex aortic aneurysms. Although repair has traditionally required longer operative times and increased radiation exposure compared with simple endovascular aneurysm repair, the recent introduction of three-dimensional technology has become an invaluable operative adjunct. Surgical augmented intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving tool initiated at our institution in June 2019. In our study, we sought to determine whether this technology improved patient and operator safety. METHODS A retrospective review of patients who had undergone endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (pararenal, juxtarenal, or thoracoabdominal), type B dissection, or infrarenal (endoleak, coil placement, or renal angiography with or without intervention) at a tertiary care center from August 2015 to November 2021 was performed. Patients were stratified according to the findings from intelligent maps, which are patient-specific AI tools used in the operating room in conjunction with real-time fluoroscopic images. The primary outcomes included operative time, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. The secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and long-term follow-up. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between AI use and the main outcomes. RESULTS During the 6-year period, 116 patients were included in the present study, with no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Of the 116 patients, 76 (65.5%) had undergone procedures using AI and 40 (34.5%) had undergone procedures without AI software. The intraoperative outcomes revealed a significant decrease in radiation exposure (AI group, 1955 mGy; vs non-AI group, 3755 mGy; P = .004), a significant decrease in the fluoroscopy time (AI group, 55.6 minutes; vs non-AI group, 86.9 minutes; P = .007), a decrease in the operative time (AI group, 255 minutes; vs non-AI group, 284 minutes; P = .294), and a significant decrease in contrast use (AI group, 123 mL; vs non-AI group, 199 mL; P < .0001). No differences were found in the 30-day and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The results from the present study have demonstrated that the use of AI technology combined with intraoperative imaging can significantly facilitate complex endovascular aneurysm repair by decreasing the operative time, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Overall, evolving technology such as AI has improved radiation safety for both the patient and the entire operating room team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Arielle M Lee
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John Hallsten
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mathlouthi A, Yei K, Guajardo I, Al-Nouri O, Malas MB, Barleben A. Prophylactic Perigraft Arterial Sac Embolization During EVAR: Minimizing Type II Endoleaks and Improving Sac Regression. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00152-8. [PMID: 36906128 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type II endoleaks (ELII) are the most common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Persistent type II endoleaks require continual surveillance and have been shown to increase the risk of Type I and III endoleaks, sac growth, need for intervention, conversion to open or even rupture directly or indirectly. These are often difficult to treat following EVAR and there are limited data regarding the effectiveness of prophylactic treatment of ELII. The aim of this study is to report midterm outcomes of prophylactic perigraft arterial sac embolization (pPASE) performed in patients undergoing EVAR. METHODS This is a comparison of two elective cohorts of those undergoing EVAR using the Ovation stent graft with and without prophylactic branch vessel and sac embolization. Patients who underwent pPASE at our institution had data collected in a prospective, IRB approved database. These were compared against the core lab adjudicated data from the Ovation IDE trial. Prophylactic PASE was performed at the time of EVAR with thrombin, contrast and gelfoam if lumbar or mesenteric arteries were patent. Endpoints included freedom from ELII, reintervention, sac growth, all-cause mortality (ACM) and aneurysm-related mortality (ARM). RESULTS Thirty-six patients (13.1%) underwent pPASE, while 238 patients (86.9%) had standard EVAR. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 33-60). The 4-year freedom from ELII estimates were 84% for the pPASE vs 50.7% for the standard EVAR group (P=0.0002). All aneurysms in the pPASE group remained stable in size or demonstrated regression, whereas aneurysm sac expansion was seen in 10.9% of the standard EVAR group, P=0.03. At 4 years, mean AAA diameter decreased by 11mm (95% CI 8-15) in the pPASE group vs 5mm (95%CI 4-6) for the standard EVAR group, P=0.0005. There were no differences in the 4-year freedom from ACM and ARM. However, the difference in reintervention for ELII trended toward significance (0.0% vs 10.7%, P=0.1). On multivariable analysis, pPASE was associated with a 76% reduction in ELII [aHR(95%CI): 0.24 (0.08-0.65), P=0.005]. CONCLUSION These results suggest that pPASE in those undergoing EVAR is safe and effective in the prevention of EII and significantly improves sac regression over standard EVAR while minimizing the need for reintervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Yei
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zarrintan S, Yei KS, Moacdieh MP, Schermerhorn M, Clouse WD, Malas MB. Preoperative Spinal Drain Placement is Associated with Reduced Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 90:17-26. [PMID: 36442708 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a rare but serious complication of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR). Several measures including spinal drain (SD) placement have been proposed to reduce the risk of SCI in TEVARs performed for aneurysms. However, there are no specific large-scale data on potential benefits of SD placement in Stanford Type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We aimed to assess the impact of preoperative SD placement on preventing SCI during TEVARs performed for TBAD. METHODS We included all TEVAR cases performed for TBAD in Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) from 2012 to 2021. Patients with connective tissue disease, open conversion, rupture, proximal disease > zone 5, proximal landing zone <2 or SCI on presentation were excluded. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 34 dimensions by the nearest neighbor principle to compare patients based on preoperative SD placement. The primary outcome was SCI. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, perioperative complications, and 90-day2intervention. RESULTS A total of 2,683 TEVARs were performed for TBAD with 1,227 (45.7%) undergoing preoperative SD placement. Propensity matching produced 672 well-matched pairs. In the matched cohort, SD placement was not associated with significant reduction in temporary SCI (3.0% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.45). However, SD placement was associated with significant reduction of the risk of permanent SCI at discharge (1.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.012). SD was also associated with lower risk of 30-day mortality (3.7% vs 6.4%, P = 0.025) and shorter length of stay but not 90-day mortality or 90-day reintervention. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that preoperative SD placement in patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD is beneficial in reducing the risk of permanent SCI without increasing risks of perioperative complications. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Zarrintan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kevin S Yei
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Munir P Moacdieh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Marc Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - W Darrin Clouse
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mathlouthi A, Abdelkarim A, Elsayed N, Ramakrishnan G, Naazie I, Malas MB. Novel Risk Score Calculator for Perioperative Mortality after EVAR with Incorporation of Anatomical Factors. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00120-6. [PMID: 36863488 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy has been associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, all available mortality risk prediction models after EVAR lack neck anatomic associations. The aim of this study is to develop a preoperative prediction model for perioperative mortality after EVAR incorporating important anatomic factors. METHODS Data were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database on all patients who underwent elective EVAR between January 2015 and December 2018. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was implemented to identify independent predictors and develop a risk calculator for perioperative mortality after EVAR. Internal validation was done using bootstrap of 1,000 reps. RESULTS A total of 25,133 patients were included, of whom 1.1% (N = 271) died within 30 days or before discharge. Significant preoperative predictors of perioperative mortality were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.053; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.050-1.056; P < 0.001), female sex (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.38-1.54; P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.57-1.73; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.77-1.94; P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.91-2.13, P < 0.001), aneurysm diameter ≥ 6.5 cm (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.24-2.47, P < 0.001), proximal neck length < 10 mm (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.81-2.12; P < 0.001), proximal neck diameter ≥ 30 mm (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.5; P < 0.001), infrarenal neck angulation ≥ 60° (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18-1.26; P < 0.001), and suprarenal neck angulation ≥ 60° (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.16-1.37; P < 0.001). Significant protective factors included aspirin use (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.93; P < 0.001) and statin intake (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; P < 0.001). These predictors were incorporated to build an interactive risk calculator of perioperative mortality after EVAR (C-statistic = 0.749). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a prediction model for mortality following EVAR that incorporates aortic neck features. The risk calculator can be used to weigh risk/benefit ratio when counseling patients preoperatively. Prospective use of this risk calculator may show its benefit in long-term prediction of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Isaac Naazie
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Li C, de Guerre LEVM, Dansey K, Lu J, Patel PB, Yao M, Malas MB, Jones DW, Schermerhorn ML. The Impact of Completion and Follow-up Endoleaks on Survival, Reintervention, and Rupture. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1676-1684. [PMID: 36841312 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoleaks may be seen at case completion of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and the presence of an endoleak may impact outcomes. However, the clinical implications of various endoleaks seen during follow-up is not well-described. Therefore, we studied the impact of endoleaks at completion and at follow-up on mid-term outcomes. METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent EVAR from 2003 to 2016 within the VQI-Medicare database and identified patients with endoleak at procedure completion and during follow-up, excluding those presenting with rupture. We stratified cohorts by presence of completion and follow-up endoleak subtypes. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and secondary outcomes included 5-year freedom-from-reintervention and freedom-from-rupture. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests to analyze differences in time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS Of 21,745 patients with completion endoleak data, 5,085 (23%) had an endoleak. Compared to those without endoleak, those with type I endoleaks had lower five-year survival (69% vs. 75%, P<.001), type II endoleaks had higher survival (79%, P<.001), and types III, IV and indeterminate were not statistically different (73%, 73%, 75%, respectively). Freedom-from-reintervention for types I and III endoleaks were significantly lower than no endoleak cohort (I: 76%, P<.001; III: 72%, P<.001, vs. 83%), but freedom-from-rupture was higher for those with type II and III endoleak (95% and 97% vs. 94%, P<.001). Of 14,479 patients with detailed follow-up endoleak data, 2,290 (16%) had an endoleak. Compared to those without endoleak, types I and III had significantly lower 5-year survival (I: 80%, P=.002; III: 66%, P<.001 vs. 84%), but there were no differences for types II (82%) and indeterminate (77%). Those with any type of follow-up endoleak had lower 5-year freedom-from-reintervention (I: 70%, P<.001; II: 76%, P=.006; III: 36%, P<.001; indeterminate: 60%, P=.007 vs. 84%), and lower freedom-from-rupture (I: 92%, P<.001; II: 91%, P=.16; III: 88%, P=.01; indeterminate: 90%, P=.11 vs. 94%). CONCLUSIONS Compared to patients with no endoleak, those with type I completion endoleaks have lower 5-year survival and freedom-from-reintervention. Patients with types I and III follow-up endoleaks also have lower survival, and any endoleak at follow-up is associated with lower freedom-from-reintervention and freedom-from-rupture. These data highlight the importance of careful patient selection and close postoperative follow-up after EVAR, as the presence of endoleaks, specifically type I and III, over time portends worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Li
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Livia E V M de Guerre
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Kirsten Dansey
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jinny Lu
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Priya B Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Mengdi Yao
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego CA
| | - Douglas W Jones
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Khan MA, Dodo-Williams TS, Janssen C, Patel RJ, Mahmud E, Malas MB. Comparing Outcomes of Transfemoral Versus Transbrachial or Transradial Approach in Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00053-5. [PMID: 36758939 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting (TFCAS) is a valid minimally invasive option for patients who also might be suitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), alternative access sites such as transbrachial (TB) or transradial (TR) are only utilized when anatomic factors preclude direct carotid or transfemoral access. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TR/TB access in comparison to TF for percutaneous carotid artery revascularization. METHODS All patients undergoing non-TCAR carotid artery stenting (CAS) from January 2012 to June 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Database were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the access site for CAS: TF or TR/TB. Primary outcomes included stroke/death, technical failure and access site complications (hematoma, stenosis, infection, pseudoaneurysm and AV fistula). Secondary outcomes included stroke, TIA, MI, death, non-home discharge, extended length of postoperative stay (LOS) (>1 day), and composite endpoints of stroke/MI and stroke/death/MI. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess postoperative outcomes, and results were adjusted for relevant potential confounders including age, gender, race, degree of stenosis, symptomatic status, anesthesia, comorbidities, and preoperative medications. RESULTS Out of the 23,965 patients, TR/TB approach was employed in 819 (3.4%) while TF was used in 23,146 (96.6%). Baseline characteristics found men were more likely to undergo revascularization using TR/TB approach (69.4% vs. 64.9%, P = 0.009). Patients undergoing TR/TB approach were also more likely to be symptomatic (49.9% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001). Guideline directed medications were more frequently used with TR/TB including P2Y12 inhibitor (80.3% vs. 74.7%, P < 0.01), statin (83.8% vs. 80.6%), and aspirin (88.3% vs. 84.5%, P = 0.003) preoperatively. On univariate analysis, patients with TB/TR approach experienced higher rates of adverse outcomes. After adjusting for potential confounders, TR/TB patients had no significant increase in the risk of stroke/death [aOR 1.10 (0.69-1.76), P = 0.675]; however, the use of TR/TB access was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in risk for in-hospital MI [aOR 2.39 (1.32-4.30), P = 0.004] and 2-fold increase in risk of technical failure [aOR 2.21 (1.31-3.73) P = 0.003]. The use of TR/TB access was also associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of access site complications [aOR 0.53 (0.32-0.85), P = 0.009]. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that although technically more challenging, TR or TB approach serves as a reasonable alternative with lower access site complications for CAS particularly in patients where anatomic factors preclude revascularization by TFCAS or TCAR. However, TR/TB is associated with an increased risk of technical failure and myocardial infarction, which requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ali Khan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Taiwo S Dodo-Williams
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Claire Janssen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ehtisham Mahmud
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chow CY, Mathlouthi A, Zarrintan S, Swafford EP, Siracuse JJ, Malas MB. Outcomes of elective peripheral endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease performed in hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgical centers and office-based labs. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1732-1740. [PMID: 36738852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent shift in the location where peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI) are performed has occurred, from traditional settings such as hospital outpatient departments (HOPD), to ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) and outpatient-based laboratories (OBL). Different settings may influence the safety and efficacy of the PVI, as well as how it is done. This study aims to compare the postprocedural outcomes and intraprocedural details between the three settings. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all elective infrainguinal PVIs for occlusive peripheral arterial disease between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary outcomes were rates of postprocedural hospital admissions, postprocedural medical complications, and access site complications. Secondary outcomes included technical success and intraprocedural details, such as types and number of devices used, amount of contrast, and fluoroscopy time. The χ2 test, analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS A total of 66,101 PVI cases (HOPD, 57,062 [83.33%]; ASC, 4591 [6.95%]; OBL, 4448 [6.73%]) were included in the study. There were 445 cases requiring hospital admission (HOPD, 398 [0.70%]; ASC, 26 [0.57%]; OBL, 21 [0.47%]; P = .126). There were no significant differences in cardiac, pulmonary, or renal complications. Access site complications occurred in less than 1.7% of all cases and were significantly higher in OBLs when compared with ASCs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-8.03; P = .001) and significantly lower in ASCs in comparison to HOPDs (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.41; P < .001). Technical success occurred in at least 92% of all cases, regardless of setting. There was a 16-fold increase in the use of atherectomy devices in an OBL vs HOPD setting (aOR, 16.79; 95% CI, 11.77-23.95; P < .001) and a five-fold increase in the use of atherectomy devices in an ASC vs HOPD setting (aOR, 5.37; 95% CI, 2.47-11.65; P < .001). There was a five-fold decrease in the use of special balloons in an OBL vs HOPD setting (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.39; P < .001) and a four-fold decrease when comparing ASCs with HOPDs (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.51; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Elective PVIs performed in any outpatient setting proved to be safe and technically successful. However, there are significant differences in the way PVIs are performed in each setting, such as the greater use of atherectomy devices in OBLs and greater use of special balloons in HOPDs. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the durability and reintervention outcomes and understand factors associated with practice pattern variability across these different settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Y Chow
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Asma Mathlouthi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yin K, Willie-Permor D, Zarrintan S, Dakour-Aridi H, Ramirez JL, Iannuzzi JC, Naazie I, Malas MB. Anemia is associated with higher mortality and morbidity after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:357-365.e1. [PMID: 36087831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether preoperative anemia is independently associated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes. Using a national vascular surgery database, we evaluated the associations between preoperative anemia and 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival for patients undergoing TEVAR. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who had undergone TEVAR for aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer, hematoma, or thrombus between January 2011 and December 2019. We excluded patients with a ruptured aneurysm, traumatic dissection, emergent repair, treated aorta distal to zone 5, polycythemia, transfusion of >4 U of packed red blood cells intraoperatively or postoperatively, and missing data on hemoglobin level or surgical indications. The final study cohort was dichotomized into two groups: normal/mild anemia (women, ≥10 g/dL; men, ≥12 g/dL) and moderate/severe anemia (women, <10 g/dL; male, <12 g/dL). Propensity scores by stratification were used to control for confounding in the analysis of the association between the outcomes of 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and 1-year survival and a binary indicator variable of moderate/severe anemia vs normal/mild anemia. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare the 1-year survival between the two groups. A Cox regression model was fitted to assess the associations between anemia and survival outcomes. RESULTS A total of 3391 patients were analyzed, 958 (28.3%) of whom had had moderate/severe anemia. After adjustment for multiple clinical factors using propensity score stratification, moderate/severe anemia was associated with a 141% increased odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-5.05; P = .019), 58% increased odds of any in-hospital complication (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.13; P = .003), 281% increased odds of intraoperative transfusion (aOR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.68-5.53; P < .001). In addition, moderate/severe anemia was associated with significantly worse survival within the first year after TEVAR (log-rank P < .001; 1-year survival rate using Kaplan-Meier estimates, 86.4% ± 1.3% standard error vs 92.5% ± 0.6% standard error) and with an increased risk of mortality in the first postoperative year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16-2.82; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS We found that moderate or severe anemia is associated with significantly increased odds of mortality, postoperative complications, and worse 1-year survival after TEVAR. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effect of anemia correction on the outcomes of TEVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanhua Yin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Daniel Willie-Permor
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Hanaa Dakour-Aridi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Joel L Ramirez
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - James C Iannuzzi
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Isaac Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Elsayed N, Patel R, Naazie I, Hicks CW, Siracuse JJ, Malas MB. Loss of follow-up after carotid revascularization is associated with worse long-term stroke and death. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:548-554.e1. [PMID: 36183990 PMCID: PMC9868074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines recommend surveillance with duplex ultrasound scanning at baseline (within 3 months from discharge), every 6 months for 2 years, and annually afterward following carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting. There is a growing concern regarding the significance of postoperative follow-up after several vascular procedures. We sought to determine whether 1-year loss to follow-up (LTF) after carotid revascularization was associated with worse outcomes in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) linked to Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION) database. METHODS All patients who underwent carotid revascularization in the VQI VISION database between 2003 and 2016 were included. LTF was defined as failure to complete 1-year follow-up in the VQI long-term follow-up dataset. Data about stroke and mortality were captured in the VISION dataset using a list of Current Procedural Terminology, International Classification of Diseases (Ninth Revision), and International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision) codes linked to index procedures in VQI. Kaplan-Meier life-table methods and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to compare 5- and 10-year outcomes between patients with no LTF and those who were LTF. RESULTS A total of 58,840 patients were available for analysis. The 1-year LTF rate was 43.8%. Patients who were LTF were older and more frequently symptomatic, with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, chronic kidney diseases, and congestive heart failure. Also, patients who underwent carotid artery stenting were more likely to be LTF compared with carotid endarterectomy patients (54.5% vs 42.3%; P < .001). The incidence of postoperative (30 days) stroke was higher in the LTF group (2.9% vs 1.7%; P < .001). Cox regression analysis revealed that LTF was associated with an increased risk of long-term stroke at 5 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.6; P < .001) and 10 years (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5; P < .001). It was also associated with significantly higher mortality at 5 years (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.8; P < .001) and 10 years (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.9-2.5; P < .001). Stroke or death was significantly worse in the LTF group at 5 years (HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.1-2.5; P < .001) and up to 10 years (HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.8-2.3; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS One-year follow-up after carotid revascularization procedures was found to be associated with better stroke- and mortality-free survival. Surgeons should emphasize the importance of follow-up to all patients who undergo carotid revascularization, especially those with multiple comorbidities and postoperative neurological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rohini Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Isaac Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Caitlin W Hicks
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeffrey J Siracuse
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Solomon Y, Marcaccio CL, Rastogi V, Lu JJ, Malas MB, Wang GJ, Schneider PA, de Borst GJ, Schermerhorn ML. In-hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy for stroke stratified by modified Rankin scale score and time of intervention. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:529-537.e1. [PMID: 36395901 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for treating symptomatic carotid stenosis are well known, the optimal timing of intervention after acute stroke and whether the optimal timing will vary with preoperative stroke severity has remained unclear. Therefore, we assessed the effect of stroke severity and timing of the intervention on the postoperative outcomes for patients who had undergone CEA for stroke. METHODS We identified all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who had undergone CEA from 2012 to 2020 for prior stroke. The patients were stratified using the preoperative modified Rankin scale score (mRS score, 0-5) and time to CEA after stroke onset (≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days). After univariate comparisons, the patients were stratified into the following mRS cohorts for further analysis: 0 to 1, 2, 3 to 4, and 5. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death. RESULTS We identified 15,601 patients, of whom 30% had had an mRS score of 0, 34% an mRS score of 1, 17% an mRS score of 2, 11% an mRS score of 3, 8% an mRS score of 4, and 1% an mRS score of 5. Overall, 9.3% of the patients had undergone CEA within ≤2 days, 46% within 3 to 14 days, 36% in 15 to 90 days, and 8.4% within 90 to 180 days. A decreasing mRS score and an increasing time to CEA were associated with lower rates of perioperative stroke/death (Ptrend < .01). After risk adjustment, with CEA at 3 to 14 days as the comparator group, the mRS score 0 to 1 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (3.6% vs 2.0%; odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.7). The mRS score 2 group had had a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (4.4% vs 3.9%; OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.3) but a lower incidence after CEA at 15 to 90 days (2.1% vs 3.9%; OR 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.96). The mRS score 3 to 4 group had had a higher incidence of stroke/death after CEA within ≤2 days (8.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9) but a similar incidence of stroke/death after CEA at 15 to 90 days (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.3). For the mRS score 5 group, the stroke/death rates were ≥6.5% across all the time to CEA groups. However, the low sample size limited meaningful comparisons. CONCLUSIONS Patients with minimal disability after stroke (mRS score, 0-1) seemed to benefit from CEA within 3 to 14 days. However, those with severe disability (mRS score 5) have a very high risk from CEA at any time point given the poor outcomes. In contrast to the current guidelines, patients with mild disability (mRS score 2) could benefit from delaying CEA to 15 to 90 days, and those with moderate disability (mRS score 3-4) might benefit from CEA within 3 to 90 days given the acceptable in-hospital outcomes. These data should be considered within the context of the clinical situation in the weeks after index event to determine the net benefit of delayed CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoel Solomon
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christina L Marcaccio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jinny J Lu
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Grace J Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter A Schneider
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Elsayed N, Vasudevan RS, Zarrintan S, Barleben A, Kashyap VS, Malas MB. TransCarotid Artery Revascularization Can Be Safely Performed in Patients Undergoing Dialysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 92:57-64. [PMID: 36690251 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) has been effectively performed to prevent stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CS). Prior studies established that TCAR can be safely performed in high-risk patients such as octogenarians, patients with prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA), contralateral occlusion, and heavily calcified lesions. Hemodialysis patients are at an increased risk of exhibiting cardiovascular complications. This study aims to investigate how dialysis may affect TCAR outcomes. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) dataset was queried for patients undergoing TCAR from November 2016 to November 2021. Patients were divided into dialysis and nondialysis groups. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of in-hospital stroke, death, or myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke, stroke, or transient ischemic attack (TIA), death, prolonged length of stay (more than 1 day) (PLOS), MI, and stroke or death. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess in-hospital outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival and log-rank test were used to assess 1-year survival. RESULTS A total of 22,619 patients underwent TCAR during the study period. Of these, 327 patients were undergoing dialysis. On univariable analysis, dialysis patients were associated with a higher risk of mortality compared to nondialysis patients (1.2% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.030). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, this difference did not persist (odd ratio [OR]: 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.8-4.9), P = 0.136). Dialysis patients were more likely to experience PLOS (OR: 1.6, 95% CI (1.2-2), P < 0.001). There was no difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in the risk of stroke or death, stroke, stroke or TIA, MI, and stroke or death, or MI on univariable and multivariable analyses. At 1 year, the overall survival for dialysis versus nondialysis patients was 81.5% vs. 95.5%, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to date of dialysis patients who have undergone TCAR. We have shown that there was no difference in the risk of stroke, death, and MI between dialysis and nondialysis patients. Therefore, TCAR can be safely offered to patients undergoing dialysis. Future studies with larger number of patients are warranted to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rajiv S Vasudevan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sina Zarrintan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Andrew Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Vikram S Kashyap
- Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Patel RJ, Marmor R, Dakour H, Elsayed N, Ramachandran M, Malas MB. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Is Associated with Increased Risk of Bleeding and Decreased Risk of Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 88:191-198. [PMID: 35921978 PMCID: PMC10238168 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite many patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) being on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for cardiac or neurologic indications, the impact of such therapy on perioperative outcomes remains unclear. We aim to compare rates of postoperative bleeding, stroke and major adverse events (stroke, death or MI) among patients on Aspirin alone (ASAA) versus DAPT (Clopidogrel and Aspirin). METHODS Patients undergoing CEA for carotid artery stenosis between 2010 and 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) were included. We excluded patients undergoing concomitant or re-do operations or patients with missing antiplatelet information. Propensity score matching was performed between the 2 groups ASAA and DAPT based on age, sex, race, presenting symptoms, major comorbidities [hypertension, diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD)], degree of ipsilateral stenosis, presence of contralateral occlusion, as well as preoperative medications. Intergroup differences between the treatment groups and differences in perioperative outcomes were tested with the McNemar's test for categorical variables and paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for continuous variables where appropriate. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were estimated as the ratio of the probability of the outcome event in the patients treated within each treatment group. RESULTS A total of 125,469 patients were included [ASAA n = 82,920 (66%) and DAPT n = 42,549 (34%)]. Patients on DAPT were more likely to be symptomatic, had higher rates of CAD, prior percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, and higher rates of diabetes. After propensity score matching, the DAPT group had an increased rate of bleeding complications (RR: 1.6: 1.4-1.8, P < 0.001) as compared with those on ASAA despite being more likely to receive both drains and protamine. In addition, patients on DAPT had a slight decrease in the risk of in-hospital stroke as compared with patients on ASAA (RR: 0.80: 0.7-0.9, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This large multi-institutional study demonstrates a modest decrease in the risk of in-hospital stroke for patients on DAPT undergoing CEA as compared with those on ASAA. This small benefit is at the expense of a significant increase in the risk of perioperative bleeding events incurred by those on DAPT at the time of CEA. This analysis suggests avoiding DAPT when possible, during CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Rebecca Marmor
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hanaa Dakour
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mokhshan Ramachandran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Khan MA, Abdelkarim A, Elsayed N, Chow CY, Cajas-Monson L, Malas MB. Evaluating postoperative outcomes in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:191-200. [PMID: 36049585 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid endarterectomy is relatively contraindicated in patients with a hostile neck anatomy who were historically revascularized with transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS). As transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has progressively replaced TFCAS, evidence pertaining to hostile neck anatomy and TCAR is necessary to establish its safety and feasibility in this subgroup of patients. Therefore, we analyzed the impact of a hostile neck anatomy on outcomes in patients undergoing TCAR and further compared them with those undergoing TFCAS to establish recommendations for standard of care. METHODS All patients undergoing TCAR and TFCAS from November 2016 to June 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative database were included. Patients were characterized into two groups based on the neck anatomy. Hostile neck anatomy was defined as a history of neck radiation or prior neck surgery including prior carotid endarterectomy or radical neck dissection. Primary outcomes included technical failure, access site complications (hematoma, stenosis, infection, pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula), and stroke or death. Secondary outcomes included stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), death, and a composite end point of stroke or TIA. Patients with nonatherosclerotic or multiple lesions were excluded from the analysis. Primary analysis was performed with all patients undergoing TCAR and outcomes between patients with hostile and nonhostile neck anatomy were compared. Further analysis included a comparison of patients with a hostile neck anatomy undergoing TCAR and TFCAS. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess impact of hostile neck anatomy on postoperative outcomes. Results were adjusted for relevant potential confounders including age, gender, race, degree of stenosis, symptomatic status, comorbidities, preoperative medications, anesthesia type, and protamine use. RESULTS Among the 19,859 patients who underwent TCAR during the study period, 3636 (18.3%) had a hostile neck anatomy. On univariate analysis, both groups had comparable outcomes except for higher rates of stroke or death in patients with hostile neck anatomy. After adjusting for potential confounders, there were no differences in technical failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.21; P = .699), stroke (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58-1.28; P = .464), death (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.71; P = .598), and MI (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.71-1.97; P = .518). However, patients with hostile neck were at a 30% increased risk of access site complications (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = .023). Further adjusted analysis comparing the outcomes in TFCAS and TCAR among patients with hostile neck anatomy showed an almost four-fold increase in risk of death (aOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.49-9.53; P = .005) and technical failure (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.82-7.47; P < .001) among patients undergoing treatment with TFCAS. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a hostile neck anatomy undergoing TCAR experienced an increased risk of access site complications; however, the risk for technical failure and postoperative stroke/death, stroke, TIA, MI, or death was similar among both groups. TFCAS was associated with significant increase in the risk of death and technical failure compared with TCAR in this group of patients. These results confirm that TCAR should be the preferred minimally invasive revascularization procedure for patients with hostile neck anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ali Khan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Ahmed Abdelkarim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Christopher Yu Chow
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Luis Cajas-Monson
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elsayed N, Alhakim R, Al Nouri O, Baril D, Weaver F, Malas MB. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after open conversion of endovascular aneurysm repair versus primary open aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:89-96. [PMID: 35934217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has superseded that of open aneurysm repair (OAR) as the procedure of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. However, significant rates of late reintervention and aneurysm rupture have been reported after EVAR, resulting in the need for conversion to OAR (C-OAR). To assess the relative effects of C-OAR on patients, we compared the outcomes of these patients to those of patients who had undergone P-OAR. METHODS The data from all patients who had undergone C-OAR and P-OAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database from 2003 to 2018 were queried. Multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to assess the perioperative long-term outcomes. RESULTS A total of 4763 patients were included (91.4%, P-OAR; 8.6%, C-OAR). C-OAR was associated with a significant increase in the odds of perioperative mortality (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; P = .027) and renal complications (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2; P = .004) vs P-OAR. At 5 years, conversion was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9; P < .001), aneurysmal rupture (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; P = .007), and reintervention (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97; P = .022) compared with P-OAR. These results also persisted at 10 years, with conversion associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < .001), rupture (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8; P = .018), and reintervention (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS The results from the present study have demonstrated that C-OAR is associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with P-OAR. We found a significant increase in mortality, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention at 5 and 10 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rami Alhakim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Omar Al Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Donald Baril
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fred Weaver
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yei KS, Cui CL, Ramachandran M, Malas MB, Al-Nouri O. Effect of Postoperative Stroke Timing on Perioperative Mortality After Carotid Revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 92:124-130. [PMID: 36584965 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.12.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In-hospital stroke (IHS) has been associated with worse outcomes than out-of-hospital stroke (OHS) due to delays in diagnosis and treatment. A paucity of studies exists comparing the timing of postoperative stroke after carotid revascularization. We aimed to study the effect of IHS versus OHS on postoperative mortality in carotid revascularization patients in a large-scale national database. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between 2011 and 2018 in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test and multivariable logistic regression. Patients were divided based on postoperative stroke timing (no stroke, IHS, or OHS) as well as procedure type (CEA or CAS). RESULTS A total of 31,304 carotid revascularizations were performed with 420 (1.3%) IHSs and 207 (0.7%) OHSs. On adjusted analysis, there was significantly higher perioperative mortality with both IHS [odds ratio (OR): 19.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 13.61-28.18, P < 0.001] and OHS [OR: 29.73, 95% CI: 18.76-45.82, P < 0.001]. There was no difference in mortality after OHS versus IHS [OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.89-2.55, P = 0.161]. CONCLUSIONS Any postoperative stroke after carotid revascularization significantly increased the odds of 30-day mortality. In contrast to previous studies demonstrating worse outcomes after IHS than OHS, we observed similar 30-day mortality between the 2 stroke categories. Improved follow-up and early recognition with rescue within carotid revascularization patients compared to the general population could potentially contribute to these results. However, overall mortality remains high for any postoperative stroke following carotid revascularization, emphasizing the importance of vigilant in-hospital monitoring and follow-up even after discharging the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Yei
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Christina L Cui
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rokosh RS, Rockman C, Garg K, Wang SK, Motaganahalli RL, Schroeder AC, Sobraske PJ, Stoner MC, Tarbunou YA, Marmor RA, Malas MB, Maldonado TS. Multi-institutional patterns of clopidogrel response among patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization. Vascular 2022:17085381221142219. [PMID: 36428145 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221142219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. The most common DAPT regimen is aspirin and clopidogrel, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist; however, the prevalence of clopidogrel resistance (CR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions may exceed 60%. Few studies have investigated the prevalence and impact of CR in patients undergoing extracranial carotid artery stenting, particularly transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). METHODS Consecutive high-risk patients ≥ 18 years who underwent TCAR for high grade (≥70%) and/or symptomatic (≥50%) carotid stenosis with preoperative P2Y12 testing between August 2019 and December 2021 were identified across five institutions. Preoperative platelet reactivity was measured with the VerifyNow P2Y12 Reaction Unit (PRU) Test (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA), with CR defined as PRU ≥ 194 and hyper-response as PRU <70. Patients without preoperative P2Y12 testing within 30 days prior to TCAR or those on a non-clopidogrel P2Y12 inhibitor preoperatively were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was prevalence of CR. Secondary outcomes of interest included the incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS Of 92 patients identified, the majority were male (59%) and Caucasian (75%) with a mean age of 75 years (±8, range 56-92). Preoperatively, 93% of patients were on aspirin, 100% on clopidogrel, and 13% on therapeutic anticoagulation. At presentation, 36% were symptomatic. The mean preoperative P2Y12 was 156 PRU (±76, range 6-349). In total, 30 (33%) patients met criteria for CR (mean PRU 240 ± 37; range 197-349), and 15 (16%) met criteria for hyper-responder (mean PRU 38 ± 20; range 6-68). There was no significant difference by clopidogrel response phenotype in terms of sex (p = 0.246), race (p = 0.384), or symptomatic presentation (p = 0.956). Postoperatively, the cumulative incidence of stroke and MI was 2.1%, with no statistically significant difference in the incidence of in-hospital stroke (PRU 238, p = 0.489) or MI (PRU 168, p = 1) between clopidogrel phenotypes. Three (3.3%) patients, one CR (PRU 240) and two responders (PRU 119 and PRU 189), experienced postoperative access site hematomas that required no subsequent intervention. No other index hospitalization hemorrhagic complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS Using preoperative P2Y12 testing with a threshold PRU ≥ 194 to define CR, we identified a high prevalence of CR in patients undergoing TCAR similar to that in the pre-existing coronary literature. We found no significant differences in postoperative ischemic or hemorrhagic complications by clopidogrel response phenotype, although complication rates in the overall study cohort were low. CR may be a spectrum from responder to partial responder to complete non-responder, and this may account for the differences in our CR cohort compared to the ROADSTER 2 protocol deviation cohort. Further investigation is warranted to determine if a quantitative assessment of CR is sufficient to identify patients at risk of developing secondary cerebrovascular ischemic events in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rae S Rokosh
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caron Rockman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karan Garg
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shihuan Keisin Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12250Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Raghu L Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12250Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrew C Schroeder
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 6923University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Peter J Sobraske
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 6923University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Michael C Stoner
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 6923University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Yauhen A Tarbunou
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 14400University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Rebecca A Marmor
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12220University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12220University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Thomas S Maldonado
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, 12297NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Solomon Y, Rastogi V, Marcaccio CL, Patel PB, Wang GJ, Malas MB, Motaganahalli RL, Nolan BW, Verhagen HJ, de Borst GJ, Schermerhorn ML. Outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization stratified by preprocedural symptom status. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.10.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
45
|
Solomon Y, Rastogi V, Marcaccio CL, Patel PB, Wang GJ, Malas MB, Motaganahalli RL, Nolan BW, Verhagen HJM, de Borst GJ, Schermerhorn ML. Outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization stratified by preprocedural symptom status. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1307-1315.e1. [PMID: 35798281 PMCID: PMC9613587 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies on carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting demonstrated that perioperative outcomes differed according to preoperative neurologic injury severity, but this has not been assessed in transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). In this study, we examined contemporary perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent TCAR stratified by specific preprocedural symptom status. METHODS Patients who underwent TCAR between 2016 and 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. We stratified patients into the following groups based on preprocedural symptoms: asymptomatic, recent (symptoms occurring <180 days before TCAR) ocular transient ischemic attack (TIA), recent hemispheric TIA, recent stroke, or formerly symptomatic (symptoms occurring >180 days before TCAR). First, we used trend tests to assess outcomes in asymptomatic patients versus those with an increasing severity of recent neurologic injury (recent ocular TIA vs recent hemispheric TIA vs recent stroke). Then, we compared outcomes between asymptomatic and formerly symptomatic patients. Our primary outcome was in-hospital stroke/death rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups. RESULTS We identified 18,477 patients undergoing TCAR, of whom 62.0% were asymptomatic, 3.2% had a recent ocular TIA, 7.6a % had recent hemispheric TIA, 18.0% had a recent stroke, and 9.2% were formerly symptomatic. In patients with recent symptoms, we observed higher rates of stroke/death with increasing neurologic injury severity: asymptomatic 1.1% versus recent ocular TIA 0.8% versus recent hemispheric TIA 2.1% versus recent stroke 3.1% (Ptrend < .01). In formerly symptomatic patients, the rate of stroke/death was higher compared with asymptomatic patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (1.7% vs 1.1%; P = .06). After risk adjustment, compared with asymptomatic patients, there was a higher odds of stroke/death in patients with a recent stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.7; P < .01), a recent hemispheric TIA (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.0; P < .01), and former symptoms (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02), but there was no difference in stroke/death rates in patients with a recent ocular TIA (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2.2; P = .78). CONCLUSIONS After TCAR, compared with asymptomatic status, a recent stroke and a recent hemispheric TIA were associated with higher stroke/death rates, whereas a recent ocular TIA was associated with similar stroke/death rates. In addition, a formerly symptomatic status was associated with higher stroke/death rates compared with an asymptomatic status. Overall, our findings suggest that classifying patients undergoing TCAR as symptomatic versus asymptomatic may be an oversimplification and that patients' specific preoperative neurologic symptoms should instead be used in risk assessment and outcome reporting for TCAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoel Solomon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christina L Marcaccio
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Priya B Patel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Grace J Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Raghu L Motaganahalli
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Brian W Nolan
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | - Hence J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ramakrishnan G, Willie-Permor D, Yei K, Nejim B, Enuma Z, Gasparis AP, Malas MB. Immediate and Delayed Complications of IVC Filters. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022; 11:587-594.e3. [PMID: 36206894 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement has increased dramatically in the past two decades. However, literature supporting the efficacy of these devices has been limited and controversial. In the present study, we have evaluated the predictors and rates of technical complications after IVC filter insertion in a large national database. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative registry was explored (January 2013 to December 2020). Immediate complications were defined as venous injury requiring treatment, filter misplacement (failure to open, deployed >20 mm from intended site or in wrong vein, embolized to the heart), angulation >20°, and insertion site complications. Delayed complications were defined as migration, angulation >15°, fracture, caval and/or iliac thrombosis, filter thrombus, fragment embolization, and perforation. The Pearson χ2 test was used to compare the baseline characteristics between the patients who had developed immediate and/or delayed complications and those who had not. The predictors of these complications were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazard regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 14,784 patients were included in the present analysis, with a median follow-up of 11 months (interquartile range, 4-16 months). The rate of immediate and delayed complications was 1.8% and 3.1%, respectively. Angulation (1.2%) was the most common immediate complication, and filter thrombosis (1.6%) was the most common delayed complication. Compared with the patients with no immediate complications, those with immediate complications were more likely to have had abnormal anatomy (6.0% vs 1.7%; P < .001) and a landing zone other than infrarenal (7.0% vs 4.2%; P = .02). Compared with their counterparts, those with delayed complications were less likely to have received statins (21.0% vs 29.5%; P = .006) and were more likely to have a family history of venous thromboembolism (8.0% vs 5.1%; P = .047). Logistic regression analysis revealed that renal vein visualization was associated a 50% reduction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.92; P = .027) in the odds of immediate complications and female sex and abnormal anatomy were associated with a 41% (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08-1.85; P = .013) and 244% (aOR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.66-7.16; P < .001) increase in the odds of immediate complications, respectively. Immediate (P = .21) and delayed (P = .51) complications did not result in increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS The immediate and delayed IVC filter complication rates were 1.8% and 3.1%, respectively, but the occurrence of complications was not associated with increased mortality. Female sex was associated with an increase in the development of immediate complications. The incidence of immediate complications might be mitigated if advanced imaging were used for renal vein visualization before IVC filter deployment. Delayed complications might be avoided if IVC filter retrieval were performed in a timely fashion and institutional retrieval protocols were optimized.
Collapse
|
47
|
Patel RJ, Mathlouthi A, Al-Nouri O, Lane JS, Malas MB, Barleben AR. A Single Center Review of a Total Transfemoral Approach to Upper Extremity Access in Branched and Fenestrated Physician Modified Endografts. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 86:117-126. [PMID: 35809740 PMCID: PMC10339283 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aortic aneurysms are normally treated by an endovascular approach. Due to the lack of devices and increasing experience, there is a growing number of complex aneurysms undergoing repair by physician modified endografts (PMEGs). Previously, our practice was to target visceral vessels exclusively through upper extremity access. We have since then shifted to an all transfemoral approach when possible. This study aims to show the operative benefits of transfemoral only approaches. METHODS Patients who underwent a PMEG at a tertiary center between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on branched vessel approach-transfemoral only versus axillary or composite (axillary and femoral). Forty-one patients had a pararenal or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and 15 patients had more complex TAAA. Primary outcomes were operative time, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, contrast, and blood loss. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and major adverse events. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between approach type and the main outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were included with 48% (n = 27) in the transfemoral group and 52% (n = 29) in the axillary/composite group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Intraoperative outcomes revealed significant increase in the average operative time (418 vs. 246 min, P < 0.001), in radiation exposure (2,755 vs. 1,740 mGy, P = 0.03), in fluoroscopy time (108 vs. 74 min, P = 0.01) and in blood loss (579 vs. 202 cc, P = 0.002) in the axillary/composite group compared to the transfemoral group. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or major adverse events including stroke. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a transfemoral approach to complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair as opposed to axillary/composite approach has decreased operative time, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy time and no significant differences in 30-day mortality or major adverse events. When treating complex aneurysms, improving efficiency is important to minimize morbidity to patients and operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Asma Mathlouthi
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Omar Al-Nouri
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - John S Lane
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Andrew R Barleben
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Elsayed N, Unkart J, Abdelgawwad M, Naazie I, Lawrence PF, Malas MB. Role of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibition in Patients Undergoing Carotid Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e025034. [PMID: 36000412 PMCID: PMC9496413 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.025034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Previous data suggest that using renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) improves survival in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We sought to investigate the association of different patterns of use of RAASIs on perioperative and 1‐year outcomes following carotid revascularization. Methods and Results We investigated patients undergoing carotid revascularization, either with carotid endarterectomy or transfemoral carotid artery stenting, in the VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) VISION (Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network) data set between 2003 and 2018. We divided our cohort into 3 groups: (1) no history of RAASI intake, (2) preoperative intake only, and (3) continuous pre‐ and postoperative intake. The final cohort included 73 174 patients; 44.4% had no intake, 50% had continuous intake, and 5.6% had only preoperative intake. Compared with continuous intake, preoperative and no intake were associated with higher odds of postoperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.5–1.9]; P<0.001; OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.03–1.2]; P=0.010); death (OR, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.8–6.1]; P<0.001; OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.6–2.2]; P<0.001); and stroke/death (OR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.8–2.3]; P<0.001; OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1–1.3]; P<0.001), respectively. At 1 year, preoperative and no intake were associated with higher odds of stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4 [95% CI, 1.3–1.6]; P<0.001; HR, 1.15, [95% CI, 1.08–1.2]; P<0.001); death (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.5–1.9]; P<0.001; HR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2–1.4]; P<0.001); and stroke/death (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.4–1.7]; P<0.001; HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.17–1.3]; P<0.001), respectively. Conclusions Compared with subjects discontinuing or never starting RAASIs, use of RAASIs before and after carotid revascularization was associated with a short‐term stroke and mortality benefit. Future clinical trials examining prescribing patterns of RAASIs should aim to clarify the timing and potential to maximize the protective effects of RAASIs in high‐risk vascular patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadin Elsayed
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
| | - Jonathan Unkart
- Department of Surgery State University New York Downstate University Health Sciences University Brooklyn NY
| | - Mohammad Abdelgawwad
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
| | - Isaac Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
| | - Peter F Lawrence
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery University of California San Diego La Jolla CA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Naazie IN, Arhuidese I, Abdelgawwad MS, Unkart J, Conte MS, Malas MB. Association of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Usage Patterns with Mid-Term Amputation Free Survival After Lower Extremity Bypass for Peripheral Arterial Disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 88:79-89. [PMID: 36028182 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Different renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASI) usage patterns exist among patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB) for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We studied the association of RAASI usage patterns with LEB outcomes to determine which pattern is associated improved survival after LEB. METHODS We evaluated PAD patients who underwent LEB between January 2014 and December 2018 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Medicare matched database. Study cohorts included no RAASI use, preoperative RAASI use only, postoperative RAASI use only, and continuous RAASI use both pre-and postoperatively. Logistic and Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. Primary outcome was 2-year amputation free survival (AFS). RESULTS Of 19,012 patients included, 1574 (8.3%) were on RAASIs preoperatively only, 1051 (5.5%) postoperatively only, and 8484 (45.2%) continuously. Compared to no RAASI use, isolated preoperative RAASI use was associated with 2.8-fold increased odds of 30-day mortality (aOR, 2.75; 95%CI, 2.15-3.51; P<0.001) whereas continuous RAASI use had 56% lower odds of 30-day mortality (aOR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.34-0.58; P<0.001). Two-year AFS was 63.2% for no RAASI use and 60.4%, 66.2% and 73.4% for preoperative, postoperative, and continuous RAASI use respectively (P<0.001). While no RAASI use and postoperative RAASI use had comparable adjusted risks of 2-year major amputation or death (aHR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.83-1.06; P=0.312), this risk was 14% higher for preoperative RAASI use (aHR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.04-1.26; P=0.006) and 23% lower for continuous RAASI use (aHR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.72-0.82; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Isolated preoperative RAASI use was associated with worse 30-day mortality and 2-year AFS while continuous RAASI use was associated with improved 30-day mortality and 2-year AFS. Optimum survival benefit may be derived from continuous RAAS inhibition in the pre- and postoperative periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac N Naazie
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Isibor Arhuidese
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Mohammad S Abdelgawwad
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Jonathan Unkart
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate University Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Michael S Conte
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Mahmoud B Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Potter HA, Ding L, Han SM, Weaver FA, Beck AW, Malas MB, Magee GA. Impact of high-risk features and timing of repair for acute type B aortic dissections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|