Editor's Choice - Sex Specific Outcomes After Complex Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Outcome of Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

INTRODUCTION

Despite the widespread use of branched (bEVAR) and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (fEVAR) for complex aortic pathologies, there are no reliable recommendations regarding postsurgery antiplatelet therapy. We therefore evaluated the outcome of single (SAPT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following fEVAR and bEVAR.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients from two German centers treated for complex aortic pathologies were included in this retrospective study. Patient data and computed tomography angiograms were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival and freedom from target vessel (TV)-related complications were performed. The outcomes were compared between SAPT versus DAPT and bEVAR versus fEVAR. Univariate logistic regression was applied to analyze the correlation between TV patency and various anatomical aortic parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were treated with fEVAR and 33 with bEVAR. Of these, 19 patients received SAPT and 44 received DAPT postsurgery. Anatomical aortic characteristics and comorbidities were comparable among groups. Overall survival was 95% (±5.1) for SAPT and 88% (±8.8) for DAPT after 36 mo of follow-up. Patency was evaluated individually for each TV SAPT versus DAPT (celiac trunk 100% ± 0 versus 87% ± 9.6; superior mesenteric artery 86% ± 13.2 versus 100% ± 0; left renal artery 92% ± 8.0 versus 95% ± 3.6; right renal artery 72% ± 15.2 versus 81% ± 9.9). Freedom from endoleak was 35% (±13.7) for SAPT versus 30% (±13.8) for DAPT. There was no statistically significant difference for SAPT versus DAPT or for bEVAR versus fEVAR. Further, none of the anatomical aortic characteristics and bridging stent graft-related parameters analyzed predicted TV occlusion in logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe differences in overall survival, endoleak, and TV patency rates between SAPT and DAPT treated patients following bEVAR and/or fEVAR. Patient-specific factors therefore appear to be more relevant for the long-term outcomes rather than the antiplatelet regime applied postsurgery.

Preoperative risk factors for 1-year mortality in patients undergoing fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the US Aortic Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

Early survival (1-year) after elective repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) can be used as an indicator of successful repair and provides a reasonable countermeasure to the annual rupture risk based on diameter. We aimed to identify preoperative factors associated with 1-year mortality after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) and develop a predictive model for 1-year mortality based on patient-specific risk profiles.

METHODS

The US-Aortic Research Consortium database was queried for all patients undergoing elective F/BEVAR for complex AAA (cAAA) or TAAA from 2005 to 2022. The primary outcome was 1-year survival based on preoperative risk profile. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine preoperative variables associated with 1-year mortality overall and by extent of aortic pathology. Logistic regression was performed to build a predictive model for 1-year mortality based on number of risk factors present.

RESULTS

A total of 2099 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study (cAAA: n = 709 [34.3%]; type 1-3 TAAA: n = 777 [37.6%]; type 4-5 TAAA: n = 580 [28.1%]). Multivariable Cox regression identified the following significant risk factors associated with 1-year mortality: current smoker, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), aortic diameter >7 cm, age >75 years, extent 1-3, creatinine >1.7 mg/dL, and hematocrit <36%. When stratified by extent of aortic involvement, multivariable Cox regression revealed risk factors for 1-year mortality in cAAA (CHF maximum aortic diameter >7 cm, hematocrit <36 mg/dL, and current smoking status), type 1-3 TAAA (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CHF, and age >75 years), and type 4-5 TAAA (age >75 years, creatinine >1.7 mg/dL, and hematocrit <36 mg/dL). Logistic regression was then used to develop a predictive model for 1-year mortality based on patient risk profile. Appraisal of the model revealed an area under the curve of 0.64 (P < .001), and an observed to expected ratio of 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes multiple risk factors associated with an increase in 1-year mortality after F/BEVAR. Given that elective repair of cAAA or TAAA is offered to some patients in whom future rupture risk outweighs operative risk, these findings suggest that highly comorbid patients with smaller aneurysms may not benefit from repair. Descriptive and predictive models for 1-year mortality based on patient risk profiles can serve as an adjunct in clinical decision-making when considering elective F/BEVAR.

Sex Comparative Analysis of Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Female sex is a risk factor for adverse events after endovascular aortic repair. Sex comparative early and midterm outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic arch repair (F/B-Arch) are presented.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective sex comparative analysis of consecutive patients managed with F/B-Arch was conducted according to STROBE. Primary outcomes were sex comparative technical success, death, and cerebrovascular morbidity at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for follow up outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 209 patients, 38.3% were women. Coronary artery disease (p < .001) and previous myocardial infarction (p = .01) were more common in women. Non-native proximal aortic landing was higher in women (women: 51.3%; men: 31.8%, p = .005) and the aortic dissection rate was lower (28.8% vs. 48.1%, p = .005). Proximal landing to Ishimaru zones showed no difference (zone 0: p = .18; zone 1: p = .47; zone 2: p = .39). Graft configurations were equally distributed. In total, 416 supra-aortic trunks were bridged. The median number of revascularisations per patient was two (interquartile range 1, 3), with no difference between sexes (p = .54). Technical success (women: 97.5%; men: 96.9%, p = .80), 30 day mortality rate (women: 10%; men: 9.3%, p = .86), and cerebrovascular morbidity (women: 11.3%; men: 17.1%, p = .25) were similar. Women presented more access related complications (women: 32.5%; men: 16.3%, p = .006), without affecting access related re-interventions (p = .55). Survival (women: 81.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76.3 - 85.9%; men: 79.8%, 95% CI 76.0 - 83.6%) and freedom from re-intervention (women: 56.6%, 95% CI 50.4 - 62.8%; men: 55.3%, 95% CI 50.1 - 60.5%) at 12 months were similar (log rank, p = .40 and p = .41, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both sexes presented similar outcomes after F/B-Arch. Appropriate patient selection may decrease the effect of sex in F/B-Arch outcomes.

Association of women-specific size threshold and mortality in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether women derive mortality benefit from early repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term mortality for women treated at small versus large diameters.

METHOD

Women receiving elective repair of AAA at small (49-54 mm) and large (≥55 mm) diameters from 2008 to 2022 were extracted from the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (n = 1642 women). The effect of diameter on 90-day, 1- and 3-year mortality was studied in logistic regression and propensity score models. Age, co-morbidities, smoking and repair modality were considered as confounders. Men (n = 9047) were analysed in parallel.

RESULTS

Some 1642 women were analysed, of whom 34% underwent repair at small diameters (versus 52% of men). Women with small (versus large) AAAs were younger (73 versus 75 years, P < 0.001), and 63% of women in both size groups had endovascular repairs (P = 0.120). Mortality was 3.5% (90 days), 7.1% (1 year) and 15.8% (3 years), with no differences between the size strata. There was no consistent association between AAA size and mortality in multivariable models. Sex differences in mortality were almost entirely due to mortality in younger-than-average women versus men (3-year mortality: small AAAs 11.1% versus 7.3%, P < 0.030, or large 14.4% versus 10.7%, P < 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Mortality in women is high and unaffected by AAA size at repair. The optimal threshold for women remains undefined. The higher rupture risk in women should not automatically translate into a lower, women-specific threshold.

Incidence and risk factors for interval aortic events during staged fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Staged endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms with first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair may decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) associated with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms or optimize the proximal landing zone in the cases requiring total aortic arch repair. However, a limitation of multistaged procedures is the risk of interval aortic events (IAEs) including mortality from a ruptured aneurysm. We aim to identify the incidence of and risk factors associated with IAEs during staged FB-EVAR.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective review of patients who underwent planned staged FB-EVAR from 2013 to 2021. Clinical and procedural details were reviewed. End points were the incidence of and risk factors associated with IAEs (defined as rupture, symptoms, and unexplained death) and outcomes in patients with or without IAEs.

RESULTS

Of 591 planned FB-EVAR patients, 142 underwent first-stage repairs. Twenty-two did not have a planned second stage because of frailty, preference, severe comorbidities, or complications after the first stage and were excluded. The remaining 120 patients (mean age: 73 ± 6 years, 51% female) were planned for second-stage completion FB-EVAR and comprised our cohort. The incidence of IAEs was 13% (16 of 120). This included confirmed rupture in 6 patients, possible rupture in 4, symptomatic presentation in 4, and early unexplained interval death with possible rupture in 2. The median time to IAEs was 17 days (range: 2-101 days), and the median time to uncomplicated completion repairs was 82 days (interquartile range: 30-147 days). Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar between the groups. There were no differences in familial aortic disease, genetically triggered aneurysms, aneurysm extent, or presence of chronic dissection. Patients with IAEs had significantly larger aneurysm diameters than those without IAEs (76.6 vs 66.5 mm, P ≤ .001). This difference persisted with indexing for body surface area (aortic size index: 3.9 vs 3.5 cm/m2, P = .04) and height (aortic height index: 4.5 vs 3.9 cm/m, P ≤ .001). IAE mortality was 69% (11 of 16) compared with no perioperative deaths for those with uncomplicated completion repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IAEs was 13% in patients planned for staged FB-EVAR. This represented a notable morbidity, including rupture, which must be balanced with SCI and landing zone optimization when planning repair. Larger aneurysms, especially when adjusted for body surface area, are associated with IAEs. Minimizing time between stages vs single-stage repairs for larger (>7 cm) complex aortic aneurysms in patients with reasonable SCI risk should be considered when planning repair.

Sex-Comparative Outcomes of the T-Branch Device for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Females are at increased risk of mortality compared to males after complex endovascular aortic repair. This study aims to examine sex-related peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in patients managed with the t-Branch device.

METHODS

A two-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with the off-the-shelf t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were sex-comparative 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI).

RESULTS

A total of 542 patients were included; 28.0% were females. Urgent repair and type I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms were more common among females (52.6% vs. 34%, p = 0.01, and 57.1% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.004). Technical success was similar (97.4% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.755), as well as early mortality (16.2% in females vs. 10.8% in males; p = 0.084). SCI rates were similar between groups (13.6% vs. 9.2% p = 0.183). MAEs were more common in females; 33.7% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis did not identify sex as an independent predictor of adverse events. The 12-month survival rate was 75.7% (SE 0.045) for females and 84.1% (SE 0.026) for males (log rank, p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex was not detected as an independent factor of mortality, MAEs and SCI within patients managed with the t-Branch device. Feasibility was high in both groups. No significant difference was shown in survival during the 12-month follow-up.

Women with large intact abdominal aortic aneurysms remain untreated

OBJECTIVE

A lower elective repair rate among women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has been a consistent finding. Reasons behind this gender gap have not been thoroughly outlined.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05346289) at three European vascular centers in Sweden, Austria and Norway. Patients in surveillance with AAAs were consecutively identified starting from January 1, 2014, until reaching a total sample size of 200 women and 200 men. All individuals were followed for 7 years through medical records. Final treatment distributions and the proportion of "truly untreated" (surgically untreated despite reaching guideline-directed thresholds: 50 mm for women and 55 mm for men) were determined. In a complementary analysis, a universal 55-mm threshold was used. Gender-specific primary reasons behind untreated statuses were clarified. Eligibility for endovascular repair among the truly untreated was assessed in a structured computed tomography analysis.

RESULTS

Women and men had similar median diameters at inclusion (46 mm; P = .54) and at treatment decisions (55 mm; P = .36). After 7 years, the repair rate was lower among women (47% vs 57%). More women were truly untreated (26% vs 8%; P < .001) despite similar mean ages as for male counterparts (79.3 years; P = .16). With the 55-mm threshold, 16% women still classified as truly untreated. Similar reasons for nonintervention were captured for women and men (50% due to comorbidities alone, 36% morphology and comorbidity). The endovascular repair imaging analysis revealed no gender differences. Among truly untreated women, ruptures were common (18%), and mortality was high (86%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical AAA management differed between women and men. Women could be underserved in terms of elective repairs: one in every four women was untreated with over-the-threshold AAAs. The lack of obvious gender differences in eligibility analyses could imply unmeasured discrepancies (eg, in disease extent or patient frailty).

Five-year sex-related outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The impact of sex on outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) represents an area of increased interest over the last decade, and long-term data are lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate sex-related differences in long-term outcomes after TEVAR using real-world data from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.

METHODS

Data were obtained retrospectively after querying the multicenter, sponsored Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment. Patients treated with TEVAR between December 2010 and January 2021 were selected regardless of the type of thoracic aortic disease. The primary outcome was sex-specific all-cause mortality at 5 years and maximum follow-up. Secondary outcomes were sex-specific all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year, and aorta-related mortality, major adverse cardiac events, neurological complications, and device-related complications or reinterventions at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and maximum follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 805 patients were analyzed; 535 (66.5%) were males. Females were older (median, 66 years [interquartile range (IQR), 57-75 years] vs 69 years [IQR, 59-78 years], P < .001). Males had more frequently a history of coronary artery bypass grafting and renal insufficiency (8.7% vs 3.7% [P = .010] and 22.4% vs 11.6% [P < .001]). The median follow-up was 3.46 years (IQR, 1.49-4.99 years) for males and 3.18 years (IQR, 1.29-4.86 years) for females. Indications for TEVAR were mostly descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (n = 307 [38.1%]) type B aortic dissections (n = 250 [31.1%]) or others (n = 248 [30.8%]). Freedom from 5-year all-cause mortality was similar for males and females (67% [95% CI, 62.1-72.2] vs 65.9% [95% CI, 58.5-74.2]; P = .847), and there were no differences in secondary outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression showed females to have lower all-cause mortality rates; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.30; P = .834). Additional subgroup analyses based on the indication for TEVAR did not identify differences between both sexes for the primary and secondary outcomes except more endoleak type II in females with complicated type B aortic dissection (1.8% vs 12.1%; P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis suggests that long-term outcomes of TEVAR performed irrespective of the type of aortic disease are similar for males and females. Further studies are needed to clarify existing controversies regarding the impact of sex on outcomes of TEVAR.

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Females Treated with t-Branch off the Shelf Device

BACKGROUND

Female sex has been characterized as a risk factor of increased mortality in patients managed for complex aortic aneurysm using endovascular means. This study aimed to present the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of females managed electively or urgently with the t-Branch device and investigate factors affecting the early outcomes.

METHODS

A 2-center retrospective observational study was conducted including elective and urgent female patients managed with the t-Branch device (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2020. Primary early outcomes included technical success and 30-day mortality and morbidity [spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and acute kidney injury]. Follow-up survival and freedom from reintervention rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 153 females were included; 81 (52.9%) treated urgently. Urgent patients were older (73.2 ± 8.6 vs. 68.5 ± 6.8 years; P < 0.001) and presented higher previous coronary angioplasty/stenting (16.0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.005) and lower double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 46.3% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.04) rates. Technical success was 97.4%. Early mortality was 16.3% (22% in urgent; 12% in elective; P = 0.2) and SCI and acute kidney injury were diagnosed in 13.7% (11% in urgent; 16% in elective; P = 0.2) and 18.3% (22.2% in urgent; 13.9% in elective; P = 0.18), respectively. Multivariate regression analyses showed that DAPT and b-blockers were related to lower 30-day mortality. DAPT was also preventive for SCI. Survival rates were 68.4% [standard error (SE) 0.07] at 12 months for the urgent and 75.6% (SE 0.09) at 24 months for the elective group (P = 0.14). Freedom from reintervention rates were 81.4% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 64.7% (SE 0.09) at 18 months for the urgent and 81.7% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 75.4% (SE 0.081) at 18 months for the elective group (P = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients managed with the t-Branch device for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms in elective and urgent setting presented similar 30-day mortality and SCI rates.

Multicentre International Registry of Open Surgical Versus Percutaneous Upper Extremity Access During Endovascular Aortic Procedures

OBJECTIVE

To investigate access failure (AF) and stroke rates of aortic procedures performed with upper extremity access (UEA), and compare results of open surgical vs. percutaneous UEA techniques with closure devices.

METHODS

A physician initiated, multicentre, ambispective, observational registry (SUPERAXA - NCT04589962) was carried out of patients undergoing aortic procedures requiring UEA, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement, aortic arch, and thoraco-abdominal aortic endovascular repair, pararenal parallel grafts, renovisceral and iliac vessel repair. Only vascular procedures performed with an open surgical or percutaneous (with a suture mediated vessel closure device) UEA were analysed. Risk factors and endpoints were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery and VARC-3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium) reporting standards. A logistic regression model was used to identify AF and stroke risk predictors, and propensity matching was employed to compare the UEA closure techniques.

RESULTS

Sixteen centres registered 1 098 patients (806 men [73.4%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range 69 - 79 years) undergoing vascular procedures using open surgical (76%) or percutaneous (24%) UEA. Overall AF and stroke rates were 6.8% and 3.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of AF by multivariable analysis included pacemaker ipsilateral to the access (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 12.1; p = .026), branched and fenestrated procedure (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 9.6; p = .019) and introducer internal diameter ≥ 14 F (OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.1 - 20.7; p = .001). Stroke was associated with female sex (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3 - 9.0; p = .013), vessel diameter > 7 mm (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 13.8; p = .037), and aortic arch procedure (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.7 - 31.1; p = .007). After 1:1 propensity matching, there was no difference between open surgical and percutaneous cohorts. However, a statistically significantly higher number of adjunctive endovascular procedures was recorded in the percutaneous cohort (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

AF and stroke rates during complex aortic procedures employing UEA are non-negligible. Therefore, selective use of UEA is warranted. Percutaneous access with vessel closure devices is associated with similar complication rates, but more adjunctive endovascular procedures are required to avoid surgical exposure.