Survey of Telemedicine by Pediatric Nephrologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Impact of COVID-19 on patient experience of kidney care: a rapid review

INTRODUCTION

In March 2020, a pandemic state was declared due to SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19). Patients with kidney disease, especially those on replacement therapies, proved more susceptible to severe infection. This rapid literature review aims to help understand how the pandemic impacted patient experience of kidney care.

METHODS

It was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Review interim guidance. Search terms, 'coronavirus', 'kidney care', and 'patient-reported experience' and terms with similar semantic meaning, identified 1,117 articles in Medline, Scopus, and Worldwide Science. Seventeen were included in the narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The findings were summarised into three themes: remote consultation and telemedicine (n = 9); psychosocial impact (n = 2); and patient satisfaction and patient-reported experience (n = 6). Patients were mostly satisfied with remote consultations, describing them as convenient and allowing avoidance of hospital visits. Anxieties included missing potentially important clinical findings due to lack of physical examination, poor digital literacy, and technical difficulties. Psychosocial impact differed between treatment modalities-transplant recipients expressing feelings of instability and dread of having to return to dialysis, and generally, were less satisfied, citing reduced ability to work and difficulty accessing medications. Those on home dialysis treatments tended to feel safer. Findings focused on aspects of patient experience of kidney care during the pandemic rather than a holistic view.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little direct evaluation of modality differences and limited consideration of health inequalities in care experiences. A fuller understanding of these issues would guide policy agendas to support patient experience during future public health crises.

The impact of rural status on pediatric chronic kidney disease

Children and adolescents in rural areas with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face unique challenges related to accessing pediatric nephrology care. Challenges to obtaining care begin with living increased distances from pediatric health care centers. Recent trends of increasing centralization of pediatric care mean fewer locations have pediatric nephrology, inpatient, and intensive care services. In addition, access to care for rural populations expands beyond distance and encompasses domains of approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness. Furthermore, the current literature identifies additional barriers to care for rural patients that include limited resources, including finances, education, and community/neighborhood social resources. Rural pediatric kidney failure patients have barriers to kidney replacement therapy options that may be even more limited for rural pediatric kidney failure patients when compared to rural adults with kidney failure. This educational review identifies possible strategies to improve health systems for rural CKD patients and their families: (1) increasing rural patient and hospital/clinic representation and focus in research, (2) understanding and mediating gaps in the geographic distribution of the pediatric nephrology workforce, (3) introducing regionalization models for delivering pediatric nephrology care to geographic areas, and (4) employing telehealth to expand the geographic reach of services and reduce family time and travel burden.

Safety and timeliness of telemedicine initiation of continuous kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) initiations were transitioned to telemedicine to improve the timeliness of initiation, and minimize COVID-19 transmission. While telemedicine would appear acceptable for many clinical settings, safety and timeliness of telemedicine CKRT initiation is undescribed.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients on CKRT from January 2021-September 2022. Information on patient characteristics and CKRT therapy was extracted from the electronic health record. Multidisciplinary team provider attitudes and perspectives were assessed using survey.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 101 CKRT circuit initiations in patients not previously receiving CKRT, with 33% (33/101) initiated by telemedicine. There were no differences in patient characteristics, including age, weight at initiation, severity of illness, nor degree of fluid overload between the in-person and telemedicine initiation cohorts. CKRT telemedicine initiations were timelier, occurring on average 3.0 h after decision to initiate therapy compared to 5.8 h for all in-person CKRT starts (p < 0.001) and 5.5 h for night and weekend in-person starts (p < 0.001). Complications did not differ between telemedicine and in-person starts (15% vs. 15%, p = 0.99) and initial circuit life was similar. There were no differences in likelihood of death or duration of CKRT therapy. Telemedicine initiations were widely acceptable to multidisciplinary providers.

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients, telemedicine initiation of CKRT is a timely and safe option. Further standardization of telemedicine initiation of CKRT should be considered to improve the timely delivery of CKRT and may improve nephrology workforce wellness. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Age and sex-related comparison of referral-based telemedicine service utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased utilization of telemedicine services.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all referral-based ambulatory telemedicine services in Ontario from November 2019 to June 2021 was collected from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing database. Only fee-for-service billings were included in the present analysis. Coincident COVID-19 cases were obtained from Public Health Ontario. Comparisons were made based on age bracket, sex, telemedicine and in-person care.

RESULTS

Billings for telemedicine services in Ontario increased from $1.7 million CAD in November 2019 to $64 million CAD in April 2020 and the proportions reached a mean peak of 72% in April 2020 and declined to 46% in June 2021. A positive correlation was found between the use of telemedicine and COVID-19 cases (p = 0.05). The age group with the highest proportion of telemedicine use was the 10-20-year-olds, followed by the 20-50-year-olds (61 ± 9.0%, 55 ± 7.3%, p = 0.01). Both age groups remained above 50% telemedicine services at the end of the study period. There seemed to be higher utilization by females (females 54.2 ± 8.0%, males 47.9 ± 7.7%, ANCOVA p = 0.05) for all specialties, however, after adjusting for male to female ratio m:f of 0.952:1.0 according to the 2016 census, this was no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of telemedicine services remained at a high level across groups, particularly the 10-50-year-olds. There were clear age preferences for using telemedicine. Studying these differences may provide insights into how the delivery of non-hospital-based medicine has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Telehealth Experience Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Mixed Methods Study

Telehealth has become widely available to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic. While evidence suggests that telehealth serves as an acceptable alternative for most SOT recipients, their satisfaction and its context remain unclear. This study used a mixed methods approach to investigate the perspectives of SOT recipients (i.e., liver, kidney, and simultaneous liver-kidney) on the benefits and disadvantages of telehealth. A total of 252 adult SOT recipients completed an online survey that quantitatively assessed telehealth experience and satisfaction. Fifteen of them further shared their perspectives by participating in either a focus group or individual interview. Approximately 70% of online survey participants had previously used telehealth for their transplant care. The quantitative data documented that, while recipients were mostly satisfied with telehealth, especially with its effectiveness and convenience, they were less satisfied with the reliability of navigating the telehealth system. The qualitative data further showed that telehealth could be less effective for SOT recipients who perceived themselves as clinically and/or socially vulnerable, needed urgent care, and were concerned about privacy. These findings suggest that the plan for using telehealth to provide transplant care should prioritize personalization, considering unique needs and preferences of each SOT recipient.

Satisfaction with telehealth compared to non-telehealth services among pediatric patients and their caregivers: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Telehealth is the use of technology to deliver healthcare in a virtual format. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted an increase in the use of telehealth.

OBJECTIVE

To review satisfaction with pediatric care only in studies that have at least one group of pediatric patients and/or their caregivers receiving telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and at least one comparison group of those receiving non-telehealth services.

METHODS

We searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English that compared satisfaction with pediatric care between pediatric patients and/or their caregivers receiving telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic and those receiving non-telehealth services. Because of stay-at-home orders, studies with comparison groups for non-telehealth services that took place either before or during the pandemic were eligible. We conducted the search on January 5, 2023, in the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo databases. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts prior to reviewing the full-text of remaining articles. The following information from each eligible study was extracted: country, participant characteristics by comparison group, study design, telehealth approach, measurement tools to assess satisfaction, and findings by comparison group.

RESULTS

All eligible 14 studies assessed satisfaction among caregivers and/or pediatric patients participating in video and/or telephone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those having in-person appointments either prior to or during the pandemic. In 5 of the 14 studies, comparison non-telehealth services took place before the pandemic, and in the remaining 9 investigations, non-telehealth services took place during the pandemic. Thirteen studies were observational investigations with different designs and one study was a quasi-experimental intervention with 3 comparison groups for video, in-person, and hybrid visits. In 9 out of the 14 studies, satisfaction with telehealth services was higher compared to that during in-person visits. Reasons caregivers were satisfied with video visits were the ease of use and the reduced need for transportation. Reasons caregivers were not satisfied with remote care included limited personal interaction with the provider and technological challenges. Caregivers participating in telehealth expressed concerns about the lack of a physical examination. Those participating in non-telehealth services expressed that in-person interactions promoted treatment adherence. Only 1 study assessed satisfaction among patients where adolescents completed their own surveys; a higher percentage of adolescents using telehealth reported effective communication with the provider compared to patients using in-person visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth services tended to receive more favorable or comparable satisfaction ratings than in-person visits in most studies. Needed improvements in telehealth included strategies to address technological challenges and develop better rapport between the patient/caregiver and medical provider. Interventions on the effectiveness of pediatric telehealth compared to pediatric non-telehealth services on improving satisfaction and health outcomes will be valuable.

CLINICALTRIAL

Telehealth survey of providers and caregivers of children on peritoneal dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

There has been growing support for the adoption of telehealth (TH) services in pediatric populations. Children on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) represent a vulnerable population that could benefit from increased use of TH. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid adoption of TH services in the population among pediatric centers participating in The Children's Hospital Association's Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric ESKD (SCOPE) Collaborative.

METHODS

We developed a survey to explore the experience of both pediatric PD providers and caregivers of patients receiving PD care at home and using TH services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

We obtained responses from 27 out of 53 (50.9%) SCOPE centers that included 175 completed surveys from providers and caregivers. Major challenges identified by providers included inadequate/lack of physical exam, inability to visit with the patient/family in-person, and inadequate/lack of PD catheter exit site exam. Only 51% of caregivers desired future TH visits; however, major benefits of TH for caregivers included no travel, visit takes less time, easier to care for other children, more comfortable for patient, and no time off from work. Providers and caregivers agreed that PD TH visits are family centered (p = 0.296), with the lack of a physical exam (p < 0.001) and the inability to meet in-person (p = 0.002) deemed particularly important to caregivers and providers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TH is a productive and viable visit option for children on PD; however, making this a successful, permanent part of routine care will require an individualized approach with standardization of core elements. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Use of Telemedicine in Pediatric Services for 4 Representative Clinical Conditions: Scoping Review

Background

Telemedicine is becoming routine in health care. Postpandemic, a universal return to face-to-face consultations may risk a loss of some of the advantages of telemedicine. However, rapid implementation and adoption without robust evaluation of usability, efficacy, and effectiveness could potentially lead to suboptimal health outcomes and downstream challenges to providers.

Objective

This review assesses telemedicine interventions against international guidance and sufficiency of evidence to support postpandemic utilization in pediatric settings.

Methods

This scoping review was performed following searches on PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases on April 15, 2021, and May 31, 2022, and examined studies focused on telemedicine, remote consultation, video call, or remote patient monitoring in children (0-18 years) receiving outpatient care for diabetes, asthma, epilepsy, or renal disease. Exclusion criteria included studies published before 2011 as the technologies used have likely been improved or replaced, studies in adult populations or where it was not possible to disaggregate data for participants younger than 18 years as the focus of the review was on pediatric care, and studies not published in English. Data were extracted by 4 authors, and the data were corroborated by a second reviewer. Studies were examined for feasibility and usability, clinical and process outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

Results

Of the 3158 studies identified, 56 were suitable for final inclusion and analysis. Data on feasibility or usability of interventions (48 studies) were overwhelmingly positive in support of telemedicine interventions, with common themes including convenience, perceived cost savings, and ease of use. However, use in preference to usual care was rarely explored. Clinical and process outcome data (31 studies) were mostly positive. Across all studies, there was limited measurement of standardized clinical outcomes, although these were more commonly reported in asthma (peak flow) and diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c]). Implementation science data generally supported cost-effectiveness of telemedicine with a reduction of health care costs.

Conclusions

There is promising evidence supporting telemedicine in pediatric settings. However, there is a lack of evaluation of telemedicine in comparison with usual outpatient care for noninferiority of clinical outcomes, and this review highlights the need for a more standardized approach to evaluation of digital interventions.

COVID-19 Pandemic Research Opportunities in India: What the Pandemic Is Teaching Us About Transplantation

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has engulfed the whole world, and India has been the second worst-hit nation. Organ transplant services were halted in both the public and private care sectors of India, with public care sectors more adversely affected. Deceased donations were disproportionately more affected, with unfavorable rates at the peak of the pandemic. Mortality outcomes of COVID-19 among different organ transplant recipients in India have been lower compared with the Western world, with younger age and less comorbidities among Indian populations partly responsible for the lower mortality. Mortality and graft loss were mostly associated with older age and those with chronic graft dysfunction. During the pandemic, invasive fungal infections, like mucormycosis, have been reported, illustrating the need for multidisciplinary management. The Indian transplant societies have formulated and timely revised guidelines for transplantation in the COVID-19 era. Living donor transplants (both liver and kidney) after recovery from COVID-19 were both first described in India, providing a guiding tool for the world. Follow-up reports of recovered solid-organ transplant recipients have also been reported in Indian studies, showing reassuring long-term outcomes. Data of breakthrough COVID-19 cases after vaccination among both transplant recipients and waitlist candidates and research in vaccine efficacy for solid-organ transplant recipients is still underway. We suggest continuing and intensifying research activities for a better plan and strategy in case of a future pandemic.

High blood pressure in children and adolescents: current perspectives and strategies to improve future kidney and cardiovascular health

Hypertension is one of the most common causes of preventable death worldwide. The prevalence of pediatric hypertension has increased significantly in recent decades. The cause of this is likely multifactorial, related to increasing childhood obesity, high dietary sodium intake, sedentary lifestyles, perinatal factors, familial aggregation, socioeconomic factors, and ethnic blood pressure (BP) differences. Pediatric hypertension represents a major public health threat. Uncontrolled pediatric hypertension is associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease and adult-onset hypertension. In children with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension is also a strong risk factor for progression to kidney failure. Despite these risks, current rates of pediatric BP screening, hypertension detection, treatment, and control remain suboptimal. Contributing to these shortcomings are the challenges of accurately measuring pediatric BP, limited access to validated pediatric equipment and hypertension specialists, complex interpretation of pediatric BP measurements, problematic normative BP data, and conflicting society guidelines for pediatric hypertension. To date, limited pediatric hypertension research has been conducted to help address these challenges. However, there are several promising signs in the field of pediatric hypertension. There is greater attention being drawn on the cardiovascular risks of pediatric hypertension, more emphasis on the need for childhood BP screening and management, new public health initiatives being implemented, and increasing research interest and funding. This article summarizes what is currently known about pediatric hypertension, the existing knowledge-practice gaps, and ongoing research aimed at improving future kidney and cardiovascular health.

A Quantitative and Qualitative Study on Patient and Physician Perceptions of Nephrology Telephone Consultation During COVID-19

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 required rapid adoption of virtual modalities to provide care for patients with a chronic disease. Care was initially provided by telephone, which has not been evaluated for its effectiveness by patients and providers. This study reports patients' and nephrologists' perceptions and preferences surrounding telephone consultation in a chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinic.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient and physician perspectives on the key advantages and disadvantages of telephone consultations in a nephrology out-patient clinic setting.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational survey study.

SETTING

General nephrology clinic and a multidisciplinary kidney care clinic in London, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with CKD who were fluent in English and participated in at least one telephone consultation with a nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS

Nephrologists' and participants' input facilitated the development of both patient and nephrologist surveys. Participants provided self-reported measures in 5 domains of satisfaction: user experience, technical quality, perceived effectiveness on well-being, perceived usefulness, and effect on interaction. Nephrologists provided self-reported measures within 6 categories: general experience, time management, medication changes, quality of care, job satisfaction, and challenges/strengths. Descriptive statistics were used to present data. Content analysis was performed on 2 open-ended responses.

RESULTS

Of the 372 participants recruited, 235 participated in the survey (63% response). In all, 79% of the participants were ≥65 years old and 91% were white. Telephone consultation was a comfortable experience for 68%, and 73% felt it to be a safer alternative during the pandemic. Although 65% perceived no changes to health care access, most reported spending less time and fewer resources on transit and parking. Disadvantages to telephone consultation included a lack of physical examination and reduced patient-physician rapport. Eleven of 14 nephrologists were surveyed, with most reporting confidence in the use of telephone consultation. Physician barriers to telephone consultation included challenges with communications and lack of technology to support telephone clinics.

LIMITATIONS

Our survey included a majority of older, white participants, which may not be generalizable to other participants particularly those of other ages and ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Although both patients and nephrologists adapted to telephone consultations, there remain opportunities to further explore populations and situations that would be better facilitated with an in-person visit. Future research in virtual care will require measurement of health care outcomes and economics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable as this was a survey.