[Validation of the French version of the "Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised" (BAVQ-R)]

Validation and clinical usefulness of the Hamilton Program for Schizophrenia Voices Questionnaire (HPSVQ) among French-speaking voice-hearers

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), also called voices, are often distressing to individuals experiencing them. Valid and reliable instruments are necessary to document the hearing voices experience across cultures. The Hamilton Program for Schizophrenia Voices Questionnaire (HPSVQ) is becoming a widely used self-administered instrument for assessing characteristics, content and subjective effect of AVH. This study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the HPSVQ French version (HPSVQ FV) in a clinical sample of voice-hearers. The results showed that the HPSVQ yields a global score (HPSVQ-Global) as well as a distress (HPSVQ-Distress) and a severity (HPSVQ-Severity) sub-score having good, acceptable and questionable internal consistency respectively. Significant correlations were found between hallucination severity (BPRS 4.0), distress (PSYRATS-AH), voices acceptance (VAAS-9), anxiety and depression (HADS). However, no significant associations were observed between Suspicion and Unusual Thoughts (BPRS 4.0). At a one-week interval, the temporal stability of the three indices was excellent. Moreover, after a brief cognitive intervention, a significant reduction was observed in all indices. Taken together, the HPSVQ FV demonstrated good construct validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. These findings support the use of the HPSVQ in francophone clinical and research settings. However, the bi-factorial solution of the HPSVQ FV should be further examined in larger samples.

Preliminary Evidence for Heterogeneity of Beliefs About Auditory Verbal Hallucinations Intent

ABSTRACT

Perceptions of patient's auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), commonly termed voices, have important impacts on their everyday lives. Despite research emphasizing the consequences of malevolent voices, preliminary results suggest that beliefs about voices may not be mutually exclusive. As such, we aimed to characterize the heterogeneity of beliefs about AVHs and describe their clinical correlates. We recruited 78 patients referred to a Voices group therapy for refractory and distressing voices. Based on the Revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire, clustering analysis yielded four subgroups of patients with distinct pattern of beliefs about AVHs. These subgroups differed significantly in terms of affective disturbances, engagement, and resistance to their voices. Furthermore, no significant changes in beliefs about voices were observed after 6 weeks. Results of the current study suggest that the heterogeneity regarding the beliefs about AVHs should be targeted in treatment to reduce their associated negative outcomes.

Disentangling compliance with command hallucinations: Heterogeneity of voice intents and their clinical correlates

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies suggested that perceptions of voice intents (benevolence, malevolence) are associated with different psychological and behavioral responses including compliance with command hallucinations (CH). However, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the clinical differences between subgroups of clients with different perceptions of the intents of their CH. In order to better understand the risk for compliance with CH, our objectives were 1) to compare sociodemographic and clinical profiles of subgroups of clients (based on perceptions of CH intents); and 2) to investigate their specific associated risk factors for compliance with CH.

METHOD

We analyzed the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study, focusing on 181 participants with psychosis reporting CH. Group comparisons and within-group ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed using sociodemographic and clinical measures such as the BPRS, BIS-11 and NAS-PI.

RESULTS

Of the 181 participants, 102 (56.4%) reported having only malevolent voices, 14 (7.7%) rated them as benevolent only, 58 (32.03%) as benevolent and malevolent, and only 7 (3.86%) as neutral only. Results showed that individuals with malevolent voices had more emotional disturbance while those with benevolent CH had more severe positive psychotic symptoms and were more certain that they would comply in the future. Moreover, childhood physical abuse, belief about having to obey as well as psychotic symptoms significantly predict compliance with malevolent CH in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that researchers and clinicians should consider perceptions of voice intents when both assessing risk of compliance with CH and developing relevant intervention targets.

[Beliefs and distress related to hearing voices: the German version of the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised (BAVQ-R)]

BACKGROUND

Beliefs about voices are a determining factor with regards to distress, coping and therapeutic interventions in verbal auditory hallucinations. Aim of the present study was to use and validate the internationally well established Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised (BAVQ-R) in a German translation with people suffering from schizophrenic psychoses.

METHODS

93 participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and current verbal auditory hallucinations completed the BAVQ-R autonomously for their dominant voice. Sociodemographic and clinical data as well as data concerning the severity of illness (CGI-Sch) and symptom specific dimensions of voice-hearing (PSYRATS-AH) were collected. Construct validity, reliability and test-retest-reliability were calculated.

RESULTS

Each of the subscales (malevolence, benevolence, resistance, engagement) with the exception of the subscale omnipotence showed satisfying internal consistency. Good test-retest-reliability was shown for the belief-subscales but not for emotion and behaviour in resistance and engagement. Significant correlations between the subscales showed the expected results, comparable to the results of the original BAVQ-R study. No correlations with severity of the illness, but with amount and intensity of distress through voices and their negative contents correlations were found.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

The BAVQ-R is a feasible instrument to collect data about beliefs about voices in a valid and reliable way in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. From a therapeutic as well as from a scientific point of view, the question about the conceptualization of the relationship between cognition, emotion and behaviour stays relevant.

Are there clinical differences between inner, outer or dual spatial locations of auditory verbal hallucinations?

The aim of the present exploratory study was to examine the clinical differences of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (AVHs) according to their spatial localization. Sixty-six outpatients were divided into three separate groups: inner, external and dual AVHs. The three groups were compared on sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education, marital status, living situation, employment, social disability), on clinical psychiatric characteristics (diagnosis, medication, comorbidities, illness onset, illness duration and hospitalizations) and on the measure yielded by the clinical assessments (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded, version 4.0; Maastricht Voices Interview for Adults; Belief About Voices Questionnaire Revised, the Clinical Global Impression, the Global Assessment Functioning Self-Esteem Rating Short Form, the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-Bref). Gender, living situation, social quality of life and some items regarding beliefs about AVHs raised significant difference, however most of the other comparisons failed to reach significance. Taken together, our findings suggest that all AVHs subtypes have equal clinical significance in patients presenting a chronic mental illness. However, the power of the study limits the generalization of the findings. Clinical implications of the findings are proposed.