[Predictive factors of seclusion duration in patients hospitalized in psychiatry settings. A prospective multisite study in the DTRF Paris-Sud]

Characteristics and correlates of seclusion and mechanical restraint measures in a Parisian psychiatric hospital group

Introduction

Seclusion or restraint (S/R) are last-resort measures used in psychiatry to ensure the safety of the patient and the staff. However, they have harmful physical and psychological effects on patients, and efforts to limit their use are needed. We describe the characteristics and correlates of S/R events in four Parisian psychiatric centers.

Methods

Within a 3-month period, November 5, 2018 to February 3, 2019, we recorded data for patients experiencing an S/R measure as well as characteristics of the measures. We studied the mean duration of a S/R event, the time between hospital admission and the occurrence of the event, as well as correlates of these durations. We also examined factors associated with use of a restraint versus a seclusion measure.

Results

For the 233 patients included, we recorded 217 seclusion measures and 64 mechanical restraints. Seclusion measures mostly occurred after the patient's transfer from the emergency department. The duration of a seclusion measure was about 10 days. Patients considered resistant to psychotropic treatments more frequently had a longer seclusion duration than others. The mean duration of a mechanical restraint measure was 4 days. Male sex and younger age were associated with experiencing mechanical restraint.

Discussion

S/R measures mostly occur among patients perceived as resistant to psychotropic drugs who are arriving from the emergency department. Developing specific emergency department protocols might be useful in limiting the use of coercive measures.

[Isolation and mechanical restraint in psychiatry]

Since 2016, there has been a succession of legal texts aimed at framing the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint in psychiatric services. These legal evolutions are not without consequence on the practice of caregivers. We propose here a practical summary of this issue.

[Involuntary detention and seclusion measures in psychiatry: Where are we now? A regional Centre-Val de Loire 2012-2017 study]

BACKGROUND

The French legal framework in psychiatry for involuntary detention (ID) and seclusion measures was modified in 2011 and 2016, respectively. This study aimed to describe the evolution of ID and seclusion measures in the Centre-Val de Loire region (CVL France) between 2012 and 2017, using the psychiatric hospital discharge database.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted, including adult patients (≥ 18 years old) from CVL hospitalized in psychiatry or included in a care program (outpatient care) between 2012 and 2017. Hospital stays for each patient were identified by an anonymized number.

RESULTS

In 2017 in CVL, 13,942 patients were hospitalised for psychiatric reasons, with 2378 in ID (17%), a proportion that has remained stable since 2012. Among them, 3% were in care due to imminent danger (+ 54% since 2013, stabilisation since 2016), and 11% were hospitalized following a third party request (-13%). However, regarding location results varied from one department to the next. Seclusion measures involved 10% of full-time patients (stable), 27% of ID patients and 3% of those under voluntary care (stable). One quarter of the secluded patients were in voluntary care. Mean seclusion duration was 12 days, consecutive or not, and somewhat less for patients in voluntary care alone (10 days).

CONCLUSION

The region wide ID rate and average duration of seclusion were lower than the nationwide rate (24% in full-time ID in 2015; 15 days of seclusion/patient), whereas the number of imminent danger procedures increased, as did the persistence of seclusion measures for patients in voluntary care (recommended only as a last resort and/or for ID patients). These results should lead to renewed assessment of care center practices. The French psychiatric hospital discharge database has several limitations, including lack of financial incentive and highly complex structuration. However, since 2018 new data regarding seclusion and restraint measures have been added to the existing registry, and they should facilitate more accurate analyses, particularly as concerns restraint.

[Duration of seclusion and exit of the seclusion room, study of the impact of anamnestic and institutional factors]

INTRODUCTION

In France, the use of seclusion in psychiatric hospitals is regulated by the Act of January 26th 2016 which enforces a reduction of the use of coercive measures and limiting their duration. Criteria that are unrelated to the patient's symptoms might affect this decision and extend the duration of seclusion. The goal of the current observational study is, firstly, to determine which factors - unrelated to the patient's symptoms - influence the length of stay in seclusion. Secondly, it is to compare the composition of the medical and nursing teams at two times, the beginning and the end of the seclusion time period.

METHOD

We conducted this study in a La Rochelle regional hospital from October 2017 to July 2018. There were one hundred and twenty-four episodes of seclusion that occurred in the different psychiatric inpatient wards during this time. The episodes were divided into two groups: short-term and long-term seclusion, defined by the median duration of seclusion. Data were collected using a survey, completed by the nursing teams, based on the recommendations of good clinical practice published in 1998 and revised in 2017 by the French health authority. For each episode of seclusion, we collected the following data: socio-demographic information, history of psychiatric care of the patient and of violent acting-out, admission status, medical indication for seclusion, day of the week and time at the beginning and the end of seclusion, prior administration of a sedative before seclusion, exceptional events that might justify the end of seclusion, transfer to a protected room after seclusion, as well as the composition of the medical and nursing team on duty at the beginning and the end of the seclusion period. We compared the anamnesis between the short-term and the long-term seclusion groups, and we analyzed the composition of the medical and nursing teams at the two time points of seclusion. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (v. 3.5.1).

RESULTS

The mean duration of seclusion was 4.7 days and the median was 1.9 days. The average age was 37-years-old, with a ratio of 0.6 for females to males. Variables associated with a long-duration of seclusion were: the male gender (P=0.005), Compulsory Admission at the Request of a State Representative (P=0.008), a prevention measure of any hetero-aggressive action (P=0.007), the lack of psychiatric care (P=0.004), previous medico-legal issues (P=0.006), violent behavior during a previous hospitalization (P=0.022) and the use of seclusion on the weekend (P=0.01). The composition of the medical and nursing teams related to the period of the end of seclusion were: the presence of the physician in charge of the patient (P<0.001), a male caregiver in the team (P<0.001), a specialized psychiatric nurse (P<0.001) and the training of caregivers in the management of violence (P<0.001). The presence of nurses who do not usually work in the psychiatric ward was associated with the period of the beginning of seclusion (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed a strong relationship between several anamnestic factors and the duration of seclusion. Caregivers lacking information about patients, potential violent behaviors and the beginnings of seclusion on weekends are associated with a long-duration of seclusion. Our study also highlights the roles played by the caregivers according to their composition and level of training to determine the ending of patient's seclusion.