Abnormal evoked potentials in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy

Clinical and neuroimaging phenotypes of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to provide a comprehensive review of neuroimaging characteristics and corresponding clinical phenotypes of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP-A), a rare but severe neuroinflammatory disorder, to facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

METHODS

A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)-conforming systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on all available data from January 2016 to June 2023. Clinical and neuroimaging phenotypes were extracted for both adult and paediatric forms.

RESULTS

A total of 93 studies with 681 cases (55% males; median age = 46, range = 1-103 years) were included. Of these, 13 studies with a total of 535 cases were eligible for the meta-analysis. Clinically, GFAP-A was often preceded by a viral prodromal state (45% of cases) and manifested as meningitis, encephalitis, and/or myelitis. The most common symptoms were headache, fever, and movement disturbances. Coexisting autoantibodies (45%) and neoplasms (18%) were relatively frequent. Corticosteroid treatment resulted in partial/complete remission in a majority of cases (83%). Neuroimaging often revealed T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities (74%) as well as perivascular (45%) and/or leptomeningeal (30%) enhancement. Spinal cord abnormalities were also frequent (49%), most commonly manifesting as longitudinally extensive myelitis. There were 88 paediatric cases; they had less prominent neuroimaging findings with lower frequencies of both T2/FLAIR hyperintensities (38%) and contrast enhancement (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide high-level evidence for clinical and imaging phenotypes of GFAP-A, which will benefit the identification and clinical workup of suspected cases. Differential diagnostic cues to distinguish GFAP-A from common clinical and imaging mimics are provided as well as suitable magnetic resonance imaging protocol recommendations.

[Clinical features and pathogenesis of Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody-associated disorders]

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody-associated disorders (AD) were recently proposed to be immune-mediated neurological disorders. The pathogenesis of GFAP antibody-AD is poorly understood. Pathologically, there is a marked infiltration of large numbers of lymphocytes, including CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, into the meningeal and brain parenchyma, especially around the perivascular areas. GFAP-specific cytotoxic T cells are considered to be the effector cells of GFAP antibody-AD. The common phenotype of GFAP antibody-AD includes meningoencephalitis with or without myelitis. During the clinical disease course, patients present with consciousness disturbances, urinary dysfunction, movement disorders, meningeal irritation, and cognitive dysfunction. The detection of GFAP antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by cell-based assay is essential for a diagnosis of GFAP antibody-AD. The CSF can be examined for lymphocyte-predominant pleocytosis and elevated protein levels. Brain linear perivascular radial enhancement patterns are observed in about half of GFAP antibody-AD patients. Spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is used to detect longitudinal extensive spinal cord lesions. Although corticosteroid therapy is generally effective, some patients have a poor prognosis and relapse.

Visual System Involvement in Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy: Two Case Reports and a Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies can associate with an astrocytopathy often presenting as a meningoencephalitis. Visual involvement has been reported but scarcely defined. We describe 2 cases of GFAP astrocytopathy with predominant visual symptoms and present a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

We describe 2 patients with GFAP astrocytopathy from our neurology department. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines, including all patients with this disease and available clinical data, focusing on visual involvement.

RESULTS

Patient 1 presented with bilateral optic disc edema and severe sudden bilateral loss of vision poorly responsive to therapy. Patient 2 showed bilateral optic disc edema, headache, and mild visual loss with complete recovery after steroids. We screened 275 records and included 84 articles (62 case reports and 22 case series) for a total of 592 patients. Visual involvement was reported in 149/592 (25%), with either clinical symptoms or paraclinical test-restricted abnormalities. Bilateral optic disc edema was found in 80/159 (50%) of patients investigated with fundoscopy, among which 49/80 (61%) were asymptomatic. One hundred (100/592, 17%) reported visual symptoms, often described as blurred vision or transient visual obscurations. Optic neuritis was rare and diagnosed in only 6% of all patients with GFAP astrocytopathy, often without consistent clinical and paraclinical evidence to support the diagnosis. Four patients (including patient 1) manifested a severe, bilateral optic neuritis with poor treatment response. In patients with follow-up information, a relapsing disease course was more frequently observed in those with vs without visual involvement (35% vs 11%, p = 0.0035, OR 3.6 [CI 1.44-8.88]).

DISCUSSION

Visual system involvement in GFAP astrocytopathy is common and heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic bilateral optic disc edema to severe bilateral loss of vision, but optic neuritis is rare. GFAP CSF antibody testing should be considered in patients with encephalitis/meningoencephalitis or myelitis and bilateral optic disc edema, even without visual symptoms, and in patients with severe bilateral optic neuritis, especially when AQP4 antibodies are negative. Visual symptoms might associate with a higher relapse risk and help to identify patients who may require chronic immunosuppression.

A comprehensive review of transcranial magnetic stimulation in secondary dementia

Although primary degenerative diseases are the main cause of dementia, a non-negligible proportion of patients is affected by a secondary and potentially treatable cognitive disorder. Therefore, diagnostic tools able to early identify and monitor them and to predict the response to treatment are needed. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurophysiological technique capable of evaluating in vivo and in “real time” the motor areas, the cortico-spinal tract, and the neurotransmission pathways in several neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, including cognitive impairment and dementia. While consistent evidence has been accumulated for Alzheimer’s disease, other degenerative cognitive disorders, and vascular dementia, to date a comprehensive review of TMS studies available in other secondary dementias is lacking. These conditions include, among others, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, multiple sclerosis, celiac disease and other immunologically mediated diseases, as well as a number of inflammatory, infective, metabolic, toxic, nutritional, endocrine, sleep-related, and rare genetic disorders. Overall, we observed that, while in degenerative dementia neurophysiological alterations might mirror specific, and possibly primary, neuropathological changes (and hence be used as early biomarkers), this pathogenic link appears to be weaker for most secondary forms of dementia, in which neurotransmitter dysfunction is more likely related to a systemic or diffuse neural damage. In these cases, therefore, an effort toward the understanding of pathological mechanisms of cognitive impairment should be made, also by investigating the relationship between functional alterations of brain circuits and the specific mechanisms of neuronal damage triggered by the causative disease. Neurophysiologically, although no distinctive TMS pattern can be identified that might be used to predict the occurrence or progression of cognitive decline in a specific condition, some TMS-associated measures of cortical function and plasticity (such as the short-latency afferent inhibition, the short-interval intracortical inhibition, and the cortical silent period) might add useful information in most of secondary dementia, especially in combination with suggestive clinical features and other diagnostic tests. The possibility to detect dysfunctional cortical circuits, to monitor the disease course, to probe the response to treatment, and to design novel neuromodulatory interventions in secondary dementia still represents a gap in the literature that needs to be explored.

Characteristics of Movement Disorders in Patients with Autoimmune GFAP Astrocytopathy

Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy (GFAP-A) is a type of autoimmune corticosteroid-responsive meningoencephalitis that occurs with or without myelitis. Movement disorders have been reported in GFAP-A patients but have not been characterized. In this study, we examined the characteristics of movement disorders in GFAP-A patients. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 87 consecutive patients with GFAP-A attending Gifu University Hospital in Japan. We compared the demographics, clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid characteristics, and neuroimaging findings from patients with and without movement disorders. Seventy-four patients (85%) had movement disorders, including ataxia (49%), tremor (45%), myoclonus (37%), dyskinesia (2%), opsoclonus (2%), rigidity (2%), myokymia (1%), and choreoathetosis (1%). GFAP-A patients with movement disorders were significantly older than those without. Movement disorders are therefore common in GFAP-A patients, and the main types of movement disorders observed in this population were ataxia, tremor, and myoclonus. These abnormal movements can serve as clinical features that facilitate the early diagnosis of GFAP-A. Elderly GFAP-A patients are more likely to have movement disorder complications than younger patients.

Clinical, neuroradiological, diagnostic and prognostic profile of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: A pooled analysis of 324 cases from published data and a single-center retrospective study

Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy is a recently defined autoimmune meningoencephalomyelitis, associated with GFAP-IgG antibody. A pooled analysis of 324 cases from published literature and a retrospective single-center study were performed, firstly reveals the possibility that patients with myelitic lesions respond better to initial immunotherapy, but are prone to relapse, suggesting a more aggressive and long-term immunosuppressive medication for them. Moreover, our results showed using tacrolimus at maintenance stage exhibited a less tendency to relapse, providing a possibly new choice to future clinical treatments.

Autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy Presenting with Slowly Progressive Myelitis and Longitudinally Extensive Spinal Cord Lesions

We report a 65-year-old man with autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP-A) who presented with gait disturbance that he had experienced for approximately half a year. On neurological examination, he displayed spastic paraplegia and autonomic dysfunctions including dysuria and constipation. Spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging showed longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions (LESCLs) extending from the cervical to the thoracic cords. The patient was negative for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and anti-aquaporin 4 antibodies. Treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin resulted in a clinical improvement. It is important to distinguish GFAP-A from slowly progressive myelitis with LESCLs.