Risk assessment of toxicants on WHO TobReg priority list in mainstream cigarette smoke using human-smoked yields of Korean smokers

β-escin activates ALDH and prevents cigarette smoke-induced cell death

BACKGROUND

The tobacco use is one of the biggest public health threats worldwide. Cigarette smoke contains over 7000 chemicals among other aldehydes, regarded as priority toxicants. β-escin (a mixture of triterpenoid saponins extracted from the Aesculus hippocastanum. L) is a potent activator of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) - an enzyme catalyzing oxidation of aldehydes to non-toxic carboxylic acids.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of β-escin on ALDH activity, ALDH isoforms mRNA expression and cytotoxicity in nasal epithelial cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE).

METHODS

Nasal epithelial cells from healthy non-smokers were treated with β-escin (1 µM) and exposed to 5% CSE. After 6- or 24-hours of stimulation cell viability, DNA damage, ALDH activity and mRNA expression of ALDH isoforms were examined.

RESULTS

24 h β-escin stimulation revised CSE induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage. Cells cultured with β-escin or exposed to CSE responded with strong increase in ALDH activity. This effect was more pronounced in cultures treated with combination of β-escin and CSE. The strongest stimulatory effect on ALDH isoform mRNA expression was observed in cells cultured simultaneously with β-escin and CSE: at 6 h for ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1, and at 24 h for ALDH1A3, ALDH3A2, ALDH3B1, and ALDH18A1. Combined β-escin and CSE treatment prevented the CSE-induced inhibition of ALDH2 expression at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

β-escin is an effective ALDH stimulatory and cytoprotective agent and might be useful in the prevention or supportive treatment of tobacco smoke-related diseases.

Calculated cancer risks for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures in mainstream smoke of cigarettes sold in China

China is the world's largest consumer of cigarettes. However, the potential cancer risk posed by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mainstream cigarette smoke, especially species other than benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) remains unclear. In this study, we collected yield data on multiple PAH species from a variety of cigarettes in the China market and calculated their smoking-related incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) values. The computed ILCRs of the total PAHs (ILCR^ΣPAHs) for ≥95% of the brands were one order of magnitude higher than the acceptable level. ILCR^BaP accounted for only 5.0%-37.7% of ILCR^ΣPAHs among brands, indicating that using single analyte BaP to represent ΣPAHs would significantly underestimate ILCR^ΣPAHs. No clear trend of changes in ILCR^ΣPAHs was found for Chinese cigarettes over multiple years, suggesting that smoking cessation is still the best option to minimize the cancer risk of PAHs. The comparison study showed that rarely reported PAHs from Chinese cigarettes can contribute over half of ILCR^ΣPAHs for several American cigarettes, highlighting the imperativeness to improve the diversity of analytes for Chinese cigarettes. Adults would need to inhale the air-borne PAHs with a BaP equivalent concentration of at least 53.1 ng/m³ to reach the ILCR value comparable to that obtained from smoking.

The Emission of VOCs and CO from Heated Tobacco Products, Electronic Cigarettes, and Conventional Cigarettes, and Their Health Risk

The differences in aerosol composition between new tobacco types (heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes) and conventional cigarettes have not been systematically studied. In this study, the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), nicotine, and tar from heated tobacco products (HTPs), electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and conventional cigarettes were compared, and their health risks were evaluated by applying the same smoking regime and a loss mechanism of smoking. Twenty VOCs were identified in aerosols from HTPs, 18 VOCs were identified in aerosols from e-cigarettes, and 97 VOCs were identified in aerosols from cigarettes by GC–MS and HPLC analysis. The concentrations of total VOCs (TVOCs) emitted by the three types of tobacco products decreased as follows: e-cigarettes (795.4 mg/100 puffs) > cigarettes (83.29 mg/100 puffs) > HTPs (15.65 mg/100 puffs). The nicotine content was 24.63 ± 2.25 mg/100 puffs for e-cigarettes, 22.94 ± 0.03 mg/100 puffs for cigarettes, and 8.817 ± 0.500 mg/100 puffs for HTPs. When using cigarettes of the same brand, the mass concentrations of VOCs, tar, and CO emitted by HTPs were approximately 81.2%, 95.9%, and 97.5%, respectively, lower than the amounts emitted by cigarettes. The health risk results demonstrated that the noncarcinogenic risk of the three types of tobacco products decreased as follows: cigarettes (3609.05) > HTPs (2449.70) > acceptable level (1) > e-cigarettes (0.91). The lifetime cancer risk (LCR) decreased as follows: cigarettes (2.99 × 10⁻⁴) > HTPs (9.92 × 10⁻⁵) > e-cigarettes (4.80 × 10⁻⁵) > acceptable level (10⁻⁶). In general, HTPs and e-cigarettes were less harmful than cigarettes when the emission of VOCs and CO was considered.

Marine litter on a highly urbanized beach at Southeast Brazil: A contribution to the development of litter monitoring programs

Seasonal distribution of Marine Litter (ML) on Santos beaches was assessed using a citizen science strategy. Plastics and cigarette butts (CB) were the dominant items in all sampling campaigns. Seasonal distribution did not result in significant differences for most items. Plastic and CB amounts were high in summer compared to autumn. For all sampled sites the presence of beach users influenced ML densities. However, results showed that some sites presented an additional influence of local hydrodynamic. Moderate amounts of hazardous items including metal, glass, CB, sanitary waste and plastic tubes used to pack and market illicit drugs represented between 20.8 and 31% of all ML over the seasons. The beaches of Santos were classified as dirty in autumn and spring and as extremely dirty in winter and summer. These findings can serve as a baseline to support mitigating actions by public authorities and start monitoring programs of ML not only in Santos but also in other urbanized beaches.

Risk assessment of components in tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosols: a pragmatic choice of dose metrics

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment of individual tobacco smoke components is important for the purpose of prioritization or selecting chemicals for monitoring products. Smoking is characterized by a highly varying, intermittent exposure and the challenge is to choose the most appropriate dose metric.

METHODS

Generally, average daily exposure estimates are used as dose metric, without considering temporal determinants. The applicability hereof is discussed in the context of choosing dose metrics for local respiratory tract effects and for systemic effects in a smoking scenario or for the use of e-cigarettes.

RESULTS

Using average daily exposure estimates for the smoking scenario can lead to erroneous risk evaluations for several reasons. Inhaled peak air concentrations during a puff can be two to three orders of magnitude higher than the calculated average daily inhaled concentration, which may impact the assessment of both systemic and local health effects. A pragmatic risk assessment is proposed, based on the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach. The choice of an appropriate dose metric, such as inhaled concentration, inhaled dose or absorbed dose, depends on the type of effect. Temporal characteristics should be considered in the final step of the MoE approach, as is illustrated by two cases, glycerol and benzene.

CONCLUSION

The choice of an appropriate dose metric and inclusion of temporal determinants are important aspects in the risk assessment of individual smoke components. The proposed MoE approach provides the opportunity to weigh smoking-related exposure characteristics during the final step of the risk evaluation.

[Exposure of vapers to formaldehyde and acrolein: A systematic review]

Although recognized as less dangerous than conventional cigarettes, the toxicity of the electronic cigarette vapor's toxicity remains to be fully assessed. This review explores vapers' exposition to formaldehyde and acrolein.

METHOD

Systematic PubMed search for reports regarding formaldehyde or acrolein or their metabolites in electronic cigarette vapor, in vapers, or in ambient air.

RESULTS

Fifty-two publications were selected. Found in almost all studies on vaper, formaldehyde is 8 times out of 11 - and acrolein constantly - in lower amounts than those found in conventional cigarettes. Acrolein's metabolite is found in all studies in vapers. The concentrations of formaldehyde and/or acrolein generated during vapor production may be affected by the characteristics of the E-liquid, voltage, vaping topography, and by the flavor additives.

CONCLUSION

In the current state of knowledge, we must continue to support and help smokers to quit smoking, and for those who are engaged in a harm reduction approach, to minimize the duration of their electronic cigarette use.