Reviewing the reliability of Land Use and Land Cover data in studies relating human health to the environment

Linking coastal environmental and health observations for human wellbeing

Coastal areas have long been attractive places to live, work, and recreate and remain so even in the face of growing threats from global environmental change. At any moment, a significant portion of the human population is exposed to both positive and negative health effects associated with coastal locations. Some locations may be "hotspots" of concern for human health due to ongoing climatic and other changes, accentuating the need for better understanding of coastal environment-human health linkages. This paper describes how environmental and health data could be combined to create a coastal environmental and human health observing system. While largely based on information from the US and Europe, the concept should be relevant to almost any coastal area. If implemented, a coastal health observing system would connect a variety of human health data and environmental observations for individuals and communities, and where possible cohorts. Health data would be derived from questionnaires and other personal sources, clinical examinations, electronic health records, wearable devices, and syndromic surveillance, plus information on vulnerability and health-relevant community characteristics, and social media observations. Environmental data sources would include weather and climate, beach and coastal conditions, sentinel species, occurrences of harmful organisms and substances, seafood safety advisories, and distribution, proximity, and characteristics of health-promoting green and blue spaces. Where available, information on supporting resources could be added. Establishment of a linked network of coastal health observatories could provide powerful tools for understanding the positive and negative health effects of coastal living, lead to better health protections and enhanced wellbeing, and provide significant benefits to coastal residents, including the historically disadvantaged, as well as the military, hospitals and emergency departments, academic medical, public health, and environmental health programs, and others. Early networks could provide best practices and lessons learned to assist later entries.

Evaluating the Accuracy and Spatial Agreement of Five Global Land Cover Datasets in the Ecologically Vulnerable South China Karst

Accurate and reliable land cover information is vital for ecosystem management and regional sustainable development, especially for ecologically vulnerable areas. The South China Karst, one of the largest and most concentrated karst distribution areas globally, has been undergoing large-scale afforestation projects to combat accelerating land degradation since the turn of the new millennium. Here, we assess five recent and widely used global land cover datasets (i.e., CCI-LC, MCD12Q1, GlobeLand30, GlobCover, and CGLS-LC) for their comparative performances in land dynamics monitoring in the South China Karst during 2000–2020 based on the reference China Land Use/Cover Database. The assessment proceeded from three aspects: areal comparison, spatial agreement, and accuracy metrics. Moreover, divergent responses of overall accuracy with regard to varying terrain and geomorphic conditions have also been quantified. The results reveal that obvious discrepancies exist amongst land cover maps in both area and spatial patterns. The spatial agreement remains low in the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau and heterogeneous mountainous karst areas. Furthermore, the overall accuracy of the five datasets ranges from 40.3% to 52.0%. The CGLS-LC dataset, with the highest accuracy, is the most accurate dataset for mountainous southern China, followed by GlobeLand30 (51.4%), CCI-LC (50.0%), MCD12Q1 (41.4%), and GlobCover (40.3%). Despite the low overall accuracy, MCD12Q1 has the best accuracy in areas with an elevation above 1200 m or a slope greater than 25°. With regard to geomorphic types, accuracy in non-karst areas is evidently higher than in karst areas. Additionally, dataset accuracy declines significantly (p < 0.05) with an increase in landscape heterogeneity in the region. These findings provide useful guidelines for future land cover mapping and dataset fusion.

Environmental heterogeneity in human health studies. A compositional methodology for Land Use and Land cover data

The use of Land use and Land cover (LULC) data is gradually becoming more widely spread in studies relating the environment to human health. However, little research has acknowledged the compositional nature of these data. The goal of the present study is to explore, for the first time, the independent effect of eight LULC categories (agricultural land, bare land, coniferous forest, broad-leaved forest, sclerophyll forest, grassland and shrubs, urban areas, and waterbodies) on three selected common health conditions: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), asthma and anxiety, using a compositional methodological approach and leveraging observational health data of Catalonia (Spain) at area level. We fixed the risk exposure scenario using three covariates (socioeconomic status, age group, and sex). Then, we assessed the independent effect of the eight LULC categories on each health condition. Our results show that each LULC category has a distinctive effect on the three health conditions and that the three covariates clearly modify this effect. This compositional approach has yielded plausible results supported by the existing literature, highlighting the relevance of environmental heterogeneity in health studies. In this sense, we argue that different types of environment possess exclusive biotic and abiotic elements affecting distinctively on human health. We believe our contribution might help researchers approach the environment in a more multidimensional manner integrating environmental heterogeneity in the analysis.

Community Risk Factors in the COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Catalonia (Spain). A Population-Based Study

The heterogenous distribution of both COVID-19 incidence and mortality in Catalonia (Spain) during the firsts moths of the pandemic suggests that differences in baseline risk factors across regions might play a relevant role in modulating the outcome of the pandemic. This paper investigates the associations between both COVID-19 incidence and mortality and air pollutant concentration levels, and screens the potential effect of the type of agri-food industry and the overall land use and cover (LULC) at area level. We used a main model with demographic, socioeconomic and comorbidity covariates highlighted in previous research as important predictors. This allowed us to take a glimpse of the independent effect of the explanatory variables when controlled for the main model covariates. Our findings are aligned with previous research showing that the baseline features of the regions in terms of general health status, pollutant concentration levels (here NO₂ and PM₁₀), type of agri-food industry, and type of land use and land cover have modulated the impact of COVID-19 at a regional scale. This study is among the first to explore the associations between COVID-19 and the type of agri-food industry and LULC data using a population-based approach. The results of this paper might serve as the basis to develop new research hypotheses using a more comprehensive approach, highlighting the inequalities of regions in terms of risk factors and their response to COVID-19, as well as fostering public policies towards more resilient and safer environments.