Application of sono-electrocoagulation in arsenic removal from aqueous solutions and the related human health risk assessment

Comprehensive understanding of electrochemical treatment systems combined with biological processes for wastewater remediation

The presence of toxic pollutants in wastewater discharge can affect the environment negatively due to presence of the organic and inorganic contaminants. The application of the electrochemical process in wastewater treatment is promising, specifically in treating these harmful pollutants from the aquatic environment. This review focused on recent applications of the electrochemical process for the remediation of such harmful pollutants from aquatic environments. Furthermore, the process conditions that affect the electrochemical process performance are evaluated, and the appropriate treatment processes are suggested according to the presence of organic and inorganic contaminants. Electrocoagulation, electrooxidation, and electro-Fenton applications in wastewater have shown effective performance with high removal rates. The disadvantages of these processes are the formation of toxic intermediate metabolites, high energy consumption, and sludge generation. To overcome such disadvantages combined ecotechnologies can be applied in large-scale wastewater pollutants removal. The combination of electrochemical and biological treatment has gained importance, increased removal performance remarkably, and decreased operational costs. The critical discussion with depth information in this review could be beneficial for wastewater treatment plant operators throughout the world.

The role of the current waveform in mitigating passivation and enhancing electrocoagulation performance: A critical review

Electrocoagulation (EC) can be an efficient alternative to existing water and wastewater treatment methods due to its eco-friendly nature, low footprint, and facile operation. However, the electrodes applied in the EC process suffer from passivation or fouling, an issue resulting from the buildup of poorly conducting materials on the electrode surface. Indeed, such passivation gives rise to various operational problems and restricts the practical implementation of EC on a large scale. Therefore, it has been suggested that using pulsed direct current (PDC), alternating pulse current (APC), and sinusoidal alternating current (AC) waveforms in EC as alternatives to conventional direct current (DC) can help mitigate passivation and alleviate its associated detrimental effects. This paper presents a critical review of the impact of the current waveform on the EC process towards the capabilities of the PDC, APC, and AC waveforms in de-passivation and performance enhancement while comparing them to the conventional DC. Additionally, current waveform parameters influencing the surface passivation of electrodes and process efficiency are elaborately discussed. Meanwhile, the performance of the EC process is evaluated under different current waveforms based on pollutant removal efficiency, energy consumption, electrode usage, sludge production, and operating cost. The proper current waveforms for treating various water and wastewater matrices are also explained. Finally, concluding remarks and outlooks for future research are provided.

Simultaneous removal of fluoride and nitrate from synthetic aqueous solution and groundwater by the electrochemical process using non-coated and coated anode electrodes: A human health risk study

Co-presence of fluoride (F^-) and nitrate (NO₃^-) in water causes numerous health complications. Thus, they should be eliminated by an appropriate method like the EC process. In this research, simultaneous removal of F^- and NO₃^- from synthetic aqueous solution and groundwater has been considered by the EC technique under operational parameters like anode materials (un-coated (Al and Fe) and synthesized coated (Ti/TiRuSnO₂ and Ti/PbO₂)), cathode materials (Cu, St, and Gr), current density (12, 24, and 36 mA/cm²), inter-electrode distance (0.5, 1, and 2 cm), pH (5.5, 7, and 8.5), NaCl concentrations (0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/L), electrolysis time (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min), NO₃^- concentrations (75, 150, and 225 mg/L), and F^- concentrations (2, 4, 6, and 8 mg/L) for the first time in this research. The results proved that Al as non-coated anode and Cu as cathode electrodes were more effective in the co-removal of F^- and NO₃^-. The maximum removal efficiencies of 94.19 and 95% were observed at the current density of 36 mA/cm², 1 cm of inter-electrode distance, pH 7, 1 g/L of NaCl, and 90 min electrolysis time by Al-Cu electrode for F^- (2 mg/L) and NO₃^- (75 mg/L), respectively. The higher efficiency of Al-Cu electrodes was due to the simultaneous occurrence of electrocoagulation, electroreduction, and electrooxidation processes. Al-Cu electrode application considerably diminished f- and NO3- concentrations in the groundwater. Health risk assessment proved that HQ of F^- was significantly decreased after treatment by the Al-Cu electrode. Thus, the EC process using an appropriate and effective electrode is a promising technique for treating aqueous solutions containing F^- and NO₃^-.