Gonadotropin Therapy Once a Week for Spermatogenesis in Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy Is Associated With Better Spermatogenic Outcomes than Gonadotropin Therapy in Patients With Pituitary Stalk Interruption Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of combined gonadotropin and pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy on spermatogenesis in patients with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS).

METHODS

Male patients with PSIS (N = 119) were retrospectively studied. Patients received pulsatile GnRH therapy (N = 59) were divided into response and poor-response groups based on luteinizing hormone (LH) levels after 1-month treatment with a cutoff value of 1 or 2 IU/L. Participants with gonadotropin therapy were divided into human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) group (N = 60), and patients with pulsatile GnRH therapy were classified into GnRH group (N = 28) with treatment duration ≥6 months.

RESULTS

The overall success rates of spermatogenesis for hMG/hCG and GnRH therapy were 51.67% (31/60) vs 33.90% (20/59), respectively. GnRH group required a shorter period to induce spermatogenesis (8 vs 15 months, P = .019). hMG/hCG group had higher median total testosterone than GnRH group [2.16, interquartile range(IQR) 1.06-4.89 vs 1.31, IQR 0.21-2.26 ng/mL, P = .004]. GnRH therapy had a beneficial effect on spermatogenesis compared to hMG/hCG therapy (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.08-3.57, P = .026). In patients with pulsatile GnRH therapy, compared with the poor-response group, the response group had a higher successful spermatogenesis rate (5.00% vs 48.72%, P = .002) and higher median basal total testosterone (0.00, IQR 0.00-0.03 vs 0.04, IQR 0.00-0.16 ng/mL, P = .026) with LH = 1 IU/L as the cutoff value after 1-month pulsatile GnRH therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsatile GnRH therapy was superior to hMG/hCG therapy for spermatogenesis in patients with PSIS. Earlier spermatogenesis and higher concentrations of sperm could be obtained in the GnRH group if patients received therapy over 6 months.

Gonadotropins for pubertal induction in males with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is characterized by inadequate secretion of pituitary gonadotropins, leading to absent, partial, or arrested puberty. In males, classical treatment with testosterone promotes virilization but not testicular growth or spermatogenesis. To quantify treatment practices and efficacy, we systematically reviewed all studies investigating gonadotropins for the achievement of pubertal outcomes in males with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Global Health, and PsycINFO databases in December 2022. Risk of Bias 2.0/Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for quality appraisal. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022381713).

RESULTS

After screening 3925 abstracts, 103 studies were identified including 5328 patients from 21 countries. The average age of participants was <25 years in 45.6% (n = 47) of studies. Studies utilized human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (n = 93, 90.3% of studies), human menopausal gonadotropin (n = 42, 40.8%), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (n = 37, 35.9%), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (28.2% n = 29). The median reported duration of treatment/follow-up was 18 months (interquartile range 10.5-24 months). Gonadotropins induced significant increases in testicular volume, penile size, and testosterone in over 98% of analyses. Spermatogenesis rates were higher with hCG + FSH (86%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82%-91%) as compared with hCG alone (40%, 95% CI 25%-56%). However, study heterogeneity and treatment variability were high.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides convincing evidence of the efficacy of gonadotropins for pubertal induction. However, there remains substantial heterogeneity in treatment choice, dose, duration, and outcomes assessed. Formal guidelines and randomized studies are needed.

The use of hormone stimulation in male infertility

Infertility affects 15% of couples worldwide and in approximately 50% of cases the cause is secondary to an abnormality of the sperm. However, treatment options for male infertility are limited and empirical use of hormone stimulation has been utilised. We review the contemporary data regarding the application of hormone stimulation to treat male infertility. There is strong evidence supporting the use of hormone stimulation in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism but there is inadequate evidence for all other indications.

Efficacy of Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy in Male Patients: Comparison between Pituitary Stalk Interruption Syndrome and Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

OBJECTIVE

Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), widely used to induce spermatogenesis in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) patients, can restore the pituitary-testis axis function in males with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS). This retrospective study aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of pulsatile GnRH therapy between PSIS and CHH.

METHODS

Patients of PSIS (n=25) or CHH (n=64) who received pulsatile GnRH therapy ≥ 3 months were analyzed in this retrospective study. The rate of successful spermatogenesis, the median time to achieve spermatogenesis, serum gonadotropins, total testosterone (TT), and testicular size were compared.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable except for the lower basal testosterone, triptorelin stimulated peak luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in patients with PSIS. Within similar treatment durations, significantly higher GnRH dose (p < 0.001) but lower increase in LH [2.82 (1.4, 4.55) vs. 5.89 (3.88, 8.02) IU/L, p < 0.001], TT [0.38 (0, 1.34) vs. 2.34 (1.34, 3.66) ng/mL, p < 0.001], and testicular volume (5.3 ± 4.5 vs. 8.8 ± 4.8 mL, p < 0.05) were observed in PSIS. However, spermatogenesis rate (52.0% vs. 70.3%, p > 0.05), median time of sperm appearance (14 vs. 11 months, p > 0.05), sperm concentration and progressive motility were comparable. Basal testicular volume (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27) and peak LH levels (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.0-1.23) were predictors for early sperm appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsatile GnRH therapy can improve gonad function and induce spermatogenesis in male PSIS patients, however, its efficacy may be inferior to that in CHH.

Growth Hormone Is Beneficial for Induction of Spermatogenesis in Adult Patients With Congenital Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropins are effective in inducing spermatogenesis in patients with congenital combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CCPHD). Data on recombinant human growth hormone(rhGH) adjuvant treatment to improve gonadotropin-induced spermatogenesis are limited.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This retrospective study included 60 male patients with CCPHD on a relatively large case series in a single center from mainland China. Twenty-nine patients who received gonadotropin therapy alone were defined as the Gn group, while 31 patients treated with a combination of rhGH and gonadotropins were defined as GH/Gn group.

RESULTS

Spermatogenesis rate was 96.77% (30/31) and 62.07% (18/29) in the GH/Gn and Gn group, respectively (P < 0.001). The time for initial sperm appearance in the GH/Gn group was shorter than in the Gn group (14 versus 23 months, P < 0.001). A higher level of serum testosterone was achieved in the GH/Gn group than in the Gn group (4.79 versus 3.38 ng/mL, P = 0.026). After adjustment for potential confounders, rhGH supplementation was an independent beneficial factor on spermatogenesis (HR = 2.294, 95% CI: 1.143-4.604, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

rhGH induces earlier spermatogenesis in patients with CCPHD, which encourages the co-treatment with rhGH and gonadotropins in CCPHD patients.