Immunological inflammatory biomarkers as prognostic predictors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Recent developments in molecular targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the genomic era

INTRODUCTION

Primary liver cancer is a major health problem being the sixth most frequent cancer in the world and the third cause of cancer-related death in the world. The most common histological type of liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 75-80%).

AREAS COVERED

Based on primary literature, this review provides an updated analysis of studies of genetic characterization of HCC at the level of gene mutation profiling, copy number alterations, and gene expression, with the definition of molecular subgroups and the identification of some molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Recent therapeutic developments are also highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Deepening the understanding of the molecular complexity of HCC is progressively paving the way for the development of more personalized treatment approaches. Two important strategies involve the definition and validation of molecularly defined therapeutic targets in a subset of HCC patients and the identification of suitable biomarkers for approved systematic therapies (multikinase inhibitors and immunotherapies). The extensive molecular characterization of patients at the genomic and transcriptomic levels and the inclusion of detailed and relevant translational studies in clinical trials will represent a fundamental tool for improving the benefit of systemic therapies in HCC.

Proteomic and metabolomic features in patients with HCC responding to lenvatinib and anti-PD1 therapy

Combination therapy (lenvatinib/programmed death-1 inhibitor) is effective for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We reveal that responders have better overall and progression-free survival, as well as high tumor mutation burden and special somatic variants. We analyze the proteome and metabolome of 82 plasma samples from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 51) and normal controls (n = 15), revealing that individual differences outweigh treatment differences. Responders exhibit enhanced activity in the alternative/lectin complement pathway and higher levels of lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPCs), predicting a favorable prognosis. Non-responders are enriched for immunoglobulins, predicting worse outcomes. Compared to normal controls, HCC plasma proteins show acute inflammatory response and platelet activation, while LysoPCs decrease. Combination therapy increases LysoPCs/phosphocholines in responders. Logistic regression/random forest models using metabolomic features achieve good performance in the prediction of responders. Proteomic analysis of cancer tissues unveils molecular features that are associated with side effects in responders receiving combination therapy. In conclusion, our analysis identifies plasma features associated with uHCC responders to combination therapy.

Prognostic impact of preoperative nutritional and immune inflammatory parameters on liver cancer

The immune response to tissue damage or infection involves inflammation, a multifaceted biological process distinguished by immune cell activation, mediator secretion, and immune cell recruitment to the site of injury. Several blood-based immune-inflammatory biomarkers with prognostic significance in malignancies have been identified. In this issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, they examined the prognosis of liver cancer radical resection in relation to preoperative systemic immune-inflammation and nutritional risk indices. Comparing older and younger individuals often reveals compromised nutritional and immunological statuses in the former. Therefore, performing preoperative evaluations of the nutritional status and immunity in geriatric patients is critical. In addition to being a primary treatment modality, radical resection is associated with a significant mortality rate following surgery. Insufficient dietary consumption and an elevated metabolic rate within tumor cells contribute to the increased probability of malnutrition associated with the ailment, consequently leading to a substantial deterioration in prognosis. Recent studies, reinforce the importance of nutritional and immune-inflammatory biomarkers. Prior to surgical intervention, geriatric nutritional risk and systemic immune-inflammatory indices should be prioritized, particularly in older patients with malignant diseases.

Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a transformative approach in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite their success, challenges persist, including concerns about their effectiveness, treatment costs, frequent occurrence of treatment-related adverse events, and tumor hyperprogression. Therefore, it is imperative to identify indicators capable of predicting the efficacy of ICIs treatment, enabling optimal patient selection to maximize clinical benefits while minimizing unnecessary toxic side effects and economic losses. This review paper categorizes prognostic biomarkers of ICIs treatment into the following categories: biochemical and cytological indicators, tumor-related markers, imaging and personal features, etiology, gut microbiome, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). By organizing these indicators systematically, we aim to guide biomarker exploration and inform clinical treatment decisions.

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a new prognostic factor in cancers: a narrative review

The increasing incidence of cancer globally has highlighted the significance of early diagnosis and improvement of treatment strategies. In the 19th century, a connection was made between inflammation and cancer, with inflammation recognized as a malignancy hallmark. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated from a complete blood count, is a simple and accessible biomarker of inflammation status. NLR has also been proven to be a prognostic factor for various medical conditions, including mortality classification in cardiac patients, infectious diseases, postoperative complications, and inflammatory states. In this narrative review, we aim to assess the prognostic potential of NLR in cancer. We will review recent studies that have evaluated the association between NLR and various malignancies. The results of this review will help to further understand the role of NLR in cancer prognosis and inform future research directions. With the increasing incidence of cancer, it is important to identify reliable and accessible prognostic markers to improve patient outcomes. The study of NLR in cancer may provide valuable insights into the development and progression of cancer and inform clinical decision-making.

Inflammation-related nomogram for predicting survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma received conversion therapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of conversion therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common clinical concern.

AIM

To analyse the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable HCC who received conversion therapy.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n = 120) and a validation cohort (n = 30). Using the independent risk factors in the training cohort, a nomogram model was constructed to predict OS for patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization following hepatic resection. The nomogram was internally validated with the bootstrapping method. The predictive performance of nomogram was assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), calibration plot and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with six other conventional HCC staging systems.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox analysis identified that albumin, blood urea nitrogen, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, macrovascular invasion and tumour number were the six independent prognostic factors correlated with OS in nomogram model. The C-index in the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.752 and 0.807 for predicting OS, which were higher than those of the six conventional HCC staging systems (0.563 to 0.715 for the training cohort and 0.458 to 0.571 for the validation cohort). The calibration plots showed good consistency between the nomogram prediction of OS and the actual observations of OS. Decision curve analyses indicated satisfactory clinical utility. With a total nomogram score of 196, patients were accurately classified into low-risk and high-risk groups. Furthermore, we have deployed the model into online calculators that can be accessed for free at https://ctmodelforunresectablehcc.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram achieved optimal individualized prognostication of OS in HCC patients who received conversion therapy, which could be a useful clinical tool to help guide postoperative personalized interventions and prognosis judgement.

Biomarker discovery and application-An opportunity to resolve the challenge of liver cancer diagnosis and treatment

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignancies, with severe morbidity and mortality. While considerable progress has been made in liver cancer treatment, the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients has not improved significantly. Reasons include the inadequate capability of early screening and diagnosis, a high incidence of recurrence and metastasis, a high degree of tumor heterogeneity, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the identification and validation of specific and robust liver cancer biomarkers are of major importance for early screening, timely diagnosis, accurate prognosis, and the prevention of tumor progression. In this review, we highlight some of the latest research progress and potential applications of liver cancer biomarkers, describing hotspots and prospective directions in biomarker discovery.

Tumor-derived insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 contributes to resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide one of the few therapeutic options for effective treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, patients with HCC often develop resistance toward antiangiogenic TKIs, and the underlying mechanisms are not understood. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms underlying antiangiogenic TKI resistance in HCC.

METHODS

We used an unbiased proteomic approach to define proteins that were responsible for the resistance to antiangiogenic TKIs in HCC patients. We evaluated the prognosis, therapeutic response, and serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) levels of 31 lenvatinib-treated HCC patients. Based on the array of results, a retrospective clinical study and preclinical experiments using mouse and human hepatoma cells were conducted. Additionally, in vivo genetic and pharmacological gain- and loss-of-function experiments were performed.

RESULTS

In the patient cohort, IGFBP-1 was identified as the signaling molecule with the highest expression that was inversely associated with overall survival. Mechanistically, antiangiogenic TKI treatment markedly elevated tumor IGFBP-1 levels via the hypoxia-hypoxia inducible factor signaling. IGFBP-1 stimulated angiogenesis through activation of the integrin α5β1-focal adhesion kinase pathway. Consequently, loss of IGFBP-1 and integrin α5β1 by genetic and pharmacological approaches re-sensitized HCC to lenvatinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, our data shed light on mechanisms underlying acquired resistance of HCC to antiangiogenic TKIs. Antiangiogenic TKIs induced an increase of tumor IGFBP-1, which promoted angiogenesis through activating the IGFBP-1-integrin α5β1 pathway. These data bolster the application of a new therapeutic concept by combining antiangiogenic TKIs with IGFBP-1 inhibitors.

Significance of Physical Status and Liver Function Reserve for Outcome of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Lenvatinib Treatment

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the primary therapeutic option for patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the selection of a suitable TKI is an issue in real-world clinical practice. Thus, this study aimed to identify patients most likely to benefit from lenvatinib treatment.

Methods

A retrospective review of 143 patients with unresectable advanced-stage HCC treated with lenvatinib between January 2020 and December 2021 was performed. Outcomes related to lenvatinib treatment were measured, and the clinical parameters affecting prognosis were analyzed.

Results

Overall, the median time of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 months and 17.7 months, respectively. Prognostic analyses found that Child-Pugh score > 5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-3.80, p = 0.001) was a significant factor affecting the PFS of HCC after lenvatinib treatment. Child-Pugh score > 5 (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.20-3.74, p = 0.009), body weight ≥ 60 kg (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.32-0.90, p = 0.020), and additional trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment (HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21-0.70, p = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors for OS. However, early α-fetoprotein reduction was not significantly correlated with patient outcomes. Additionally, patients with pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio > 4.07 showed a significant worse PFS and OS than other patients.

Conclusion

The outcome of patients with advanced-stage HCC remains poor. However, the host condition, including good physical status and better functional liver preservation, largely affected the outcome of patients receiving lenvatinib treatment. Moreover, additional locoregional therapy for intrahepatic HCC, other than TKI treatment, can be considered in certain patients to achieve a favorable outcome.

Cholesterol and C-reactive protein prognostic score predicted prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors based interventional therapies for intermediate-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Serum cholesterol (CHO) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been successfully used as prognostic predictors for several malignancies, respectively. However, the clinicopathological significance of CHO and CRP levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICIs-based hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. Serum CHO and CRP levels were measured for a total of 152 HCC patients that had been treated with ICIs-based HAIC from February 2019 to April 2020. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival. The median OS was not reached in the CHO-low subgroup and 17.7 months in the CHO-high subgroup (P = 0.015). The median OS was not reached in the CRP-low subgroup and 20.0 months in the CRP-high subgroup (P = 0.010). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that both serum CHO and CRP levels were independent risk factors for the OS of HCC patients treated with ICIs-based HAIC (P < 0.05). Moreover, Cox regression analysis after Propensity Score Matching showed the similar results. CHO and CRP prognostic score (CCPS) combining CHO and CRP levels could significantly stratify HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups (P < 0.001). Patients in the risk subgroups reported similar disease control rates (P = 0.121) and significantly different overall response rates (low- vs intermediate- vs high-risk groups: 70.6 % vs 46.6 % vs 44.1 %, respectively, P = 0.038) according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The results of this study support the association between CCPS high risk with the response and OS for HCC patients receiving ICIs-based HAIC.

Prognostic prediction of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been used to predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the prognostic value of PLR in patients with HCC.

Methods

We systematically retrieved relevant literature published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to November 20, 2021. The primary outcomes were the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), and secondary study outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS). All statistical analyses were conducted by Review Manager 5.4.1 and STATA 16.0 software.

Results

A total of 21 studies comprising 8,779 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results suggested that a high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18-1.52, P<0.00001; I²=59%, P=0.0005), RFS or DFS (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13-1.63, P=0.001; I²=69%, P=0.002), and PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.09-2.22, P=0.02; I²=73%, P=0.02). The subgroup analysis for OS showed, when the PLR cutoff value was greater than 150, the heterogeneity decreased to 0 (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.33-1.68, P<0.00001; I²=0%, P=0.56); when the HBsAg positive population was increased to 100%, the heterogeneity decreased to 0 (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22-1.73, P<0.0001; I²=0%, P=0.45); compared with other regions in the world, it was more significant in China (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.62, P<0.00001; I²=52%, P=0.01). In addition, scatter plot showed that the HR was negatively correlated with the proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that PLR is a negative correlation prognostic biomarker for HCC, high PLR values indicate poor OS, RFS, DFS and PFS, especially in hepatitis B virus (HBV) related patients.

Predictive biomarkers of survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment

BACKGROUND

Since atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATE+BEV) regimen for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was released quite recently, real-world data are lacking. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and predictive biomarkers for survival in patients receiving ATE+BEV.

METHODS

Between 2020 and 2021, HCC patients receiving ATE+BEV at academic teaching hospitals were recruited. Treatment response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1.).

RESULTS

Among 121 patients enrolled, the median age was 63 years, with male predominance (82.6%). Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were identified in 2.5%, 26.4%, 54.5%, and 16.6%, respectively. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) response, defined as ≥30% and ≥50% decreases, respectively, at the first response evaluation relative to baseline, and those with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <2.5, had significantly higher objective response rates (42.6% vs. 21.5%, 50.0% vs. 26.2%, and 39.0% vs. 19.4%, respectively; all p < 0.05). During follow-up, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months. Multivariable analyses showed that macrovascular invasion (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.541; p = 0.017), DCP ≥186 mAU/ml (aHR 5.102; p < 0.001), NLR ≥2.5 (aHR 3.584; p = 0.001), and an NLR decrease ≥10% at the first response (aHR 0.305; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of OS, and DCP ≥186 mAU (aHR 2.311; p = 0.002) and NLR ≥2.5 (aHR 1.938; p = 0.012) were independent predictors of PFS. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 33 (27.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

ATE+BEV showed favorable efficacy and safety. Baseline high DCP and NLR may be useful prognostic predictors for OS and PFS.

Prognostic significance of cachexia index in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy

Cancer cachexia affects quality of life, response to chemotherapy, and survival in many advanced cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment cachexia index (CXI) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systematic chemotherapy. Patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib therapy between October 2018 and October 2020 were retrospectively studied. The CXI was calculated as (L3 skeletal muscle index) × (serum albumin)/(neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio). The association with treatment response and early adverse events within the first two months of lenvatinib therapy was investigated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify the predictors of survival. A total of 116 patients (median age: 60, male: 84.5% ) with calculated CXI. They divided into two groups: high CXI (≥ 53, n = 82) and low CXI (< 53, n = 34). Patients with low CXI had a significantly lower disease control rate (61.8% vs. 89.0%, p = 0.001) and a shorter median OS (8.0 [95% CI 6.2–9.8] vs. 12.3 [95% CI 10.1–14.4] months, p = 0.002) than those with high CXI. In multivariable analysis, low CXI was independently associated with shorter OS (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.17–3.65, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.09–3.09, p = 0.02). Of note, during the first two months of lenvatinib therapy, anorexia (41.2% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.04) developed more frequently among patients with low CXI than those with high CXI. The CXI may be a clinically useful index for predicting poor treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced HCC undergoing lenvatinib treatment.

Impact of Platelets to Lymphocytes Ratio and Lymphocytes during Radical Concurrent Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy on Patients with Nonmetastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

This study examined the importance of hematological parameters as prognostic markers for people with esophageal cancer receiving radical concurrent chemoradiation.

Methods

106 patients with esophageal cancer are included in this study. Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and chi-square test were used to analyze our data.

Results

The median follow-up time for patients was 15.5 months (3-55). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age, the change of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (ΔPLR), and the change rate of circulating lymphocyte count (ΔCLC%) were independent influencing factors of OS and DFS. The patients were grouped according to the median of ΔPLR and ΔCLC%, and analysis showed that a higher ΔPLR and a higher ΔCLC% was related to poor OS and DFS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, P < 0.001). By subgroup analysis, the OS of T1-4N1-2 were better in the low ΔPLR group than the high one (P = 0.03, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.008). DFS of T3-4N1-2 in the low ΔPLR group were better than the high one (P < 0.001, P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, P = 0.022). For patients with T1-4N0-2, the OS in the low ΔCLC% group were better than in the high ΔCLC% group (P = 0.01, P < 0.001, P < 0.002, P = 0.012, P < 0.001, and P = 0.024). For T1-4N1-2, the DFS were better in the low ΔCLC% group than others (P = 0.042, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.006).

Conclusion

ΔPLR and ΔCLC% are independent factors of OS and DFS, and a lower ΔPLR and ΔCLC% are associated with a better OS and DFS. And T3-4N1-2 patients in the low ΔPLR group and low ΔCLC% group have greater survival benefit.

Early Predictive Value of Circulating Biomarkers for Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is currently the first-line therapeutic regimen for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, many patients did not experience any benefit and suffered extreme adverse events and heavy economic burden. Thus, the early identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from sorafenib is needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review focused on the clinical application of circulating biomarkers (including conventional biomarkers, immune biomarkers, genetic biomarkers, and some novel biomarkers) in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. An online search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted from the inception to Aug 15, 2021. Studies investigating the predictive or prognostic value of these biomarkers were included.

EXPERT OPINION

The distinction of patients who may benefit from sorafenib treatment is of utmost importance. The predictive roles of circulating biomarkers could solve this problem. Many biomarkers can be obtained by liquid biopsy, which is a less or non-invasive approach. The short half-life of sorafenib could reflect the dynamic changes of tumor progression and monitor the treatment response. Circulating biomarkers obtained from liquid biopsy resulted as a promising assessment method in HCC, allowing for better treatment decisions in the near future.

Analysis of Survival and Response to Lenvatinib in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

With the recent increase in the number of drug therapy options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), the key issue has become how to prolong overall survival (OS). The aim was to evaluate the association between radiological response and OS in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for u-HCC. Radiological response using both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) is a predictor of OS and achieving an objective response at the first evaluation is an independent prognostic factor for OS. In addition, if an objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if stable disease is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.

Abstract

The association between radiological response and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 182 patients with Child–Pugh class A liver function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero or one were enrolled. Radiological evaluation was performed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Initial radiological evaluation confirmed significant stratification of OS by efficacy judgment with both RECIST and mRECIST, and that initial radiological response was an independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in patients with stable disease (SD) at initial evaluation, macrovascular invasion at the initial evaluation on RECIST and modified albumin–bilirubin grade at initial evaluation on mRECIST were independent predictors of OS on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, if objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if SD is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.

Inflammatory biomarkers and dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in lenvatinib treatment for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

Background

Inflammatory biomarkers have been reported to be associated with anticancer drug efficacy in various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the associations between baseline inflammatory biomarkers or dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and treatment outcomes of lenvatinib in ATC.

Methods

Twenty ATC patients whose complete blood count were available were included in this study. Patients characteristics, overall survival (OS), and the associations between baseline inflammatory biomarkers or dynamics of NLR and treatment outcomes of lenvatinib were investigated.

Results

All 20 patients had a median baseline NLR of 4.5 (range, 1.4-19.7), a median platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) of 169.9 (range, 66.8-671.1), and a median lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) of 2.6 (range, 0.5-5.5). The median OS was 4.2 (95% CI: 1.1-10.3) months in patients with baseline NLR ≤4.5 and 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1-8.3) months in patients with baseline NLR >4.5 (P=0.681). The median OS was 4.2 (95% CI: 1.1-7.8) months in patients with baseline PLR ≤169.9 and 3.9 (95% CI: 0.6-8.3) months in patients with baseline PLR >169.9 (P=0.822). The median OS was 3.7 (95% CI: 1.1-9.8) months in patients with baseline LMR ≤2.6 and 4.2 (95% CI: 0.6-5.4) months in patients with baseline LMR >2.6 (P=0.421). NLR was increased more than the standard deviation of the baseline NLR after lenvatinib initiation in two of 16 patients with follow-up NLR data available. The median OS was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1- not estimable) months in the increased group but was 5.3 (95% CI: 3.1-9.8) months in the non-increased group (P=0.003).

Conclusions

There was seemed to be no association between prognosis or treatment efficacy of lenvatinib and baseline inflammatory biomarker values in our cases with ATC. However, we possibly estimate prognosis for ATC during lenvatinib treatment by observing the dynamics of NLR.