Transrectal Ultrasound (US), Contrast-enhanced US, Real-time Elastography, HistoScanning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and MRI-US Fusion Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Comparison in prostate cancer diagnosis with PSA 4-10 ng/mL: radiomics-based model VS. PI-RADS v2.1

BACKGROUND

To evaluate accuracy of MRI-based radiomics in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL and compare it with the latest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) score.

METHODS

221 patients with prostate lesions and PSA levels in 4-10 ng/mL, including 154 and 67 cases in the training and validation groups. Pathological confirmation of all patients was accomplished by the use of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy or systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. 851 radiomic features were extracted from each lesion of ADC and T2WI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm and logistic regression were employed to select features and build the ADC and T2WI model. The combined model was obtained based on the ADC and T2WI features. The clinical benefit and diagnostic accuracy of the three radiomics models and PI-RADS v2.1 score were evaluated.

RESULTS

10 radiomic features were ultimately selected from the ADC images, 13 from the T2WI images and 7 from the combined models. The ADC, T2WI and combined models achieved satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in the training [AUC:0.945 (ADC), 0.939 (T2WI), 0.979 (combined)] and validation groups [AUC: 0.942 (ADC), 0.943 (T2WI), 0.959 (combined)], which was significantly higher than those in PI-RADS v2.1 model (0.825 for training cohort and 0.853 for validation cohort). Compared with the PI-RADS v2.1 score, the three radiomics models generated superior PCa diagnostic performance in both the training (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, p < 0.001) and validation groups (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Radiomics based on ADC and T2WI images can better identify PCa in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, and MRI-based radiomics significantly outperforms the PI-RADS v2.1 score.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major public health issue, as the second most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men. Many PCa cases are indolent and pose minimal risk, making active surveillance a suitable management approach. However, clinically significant prostate carcinoma (csPCa) can lead to serious health issues, including progression, metastasis, and death. Differentiating between insignificant prostate cancer (inPCa) and csPCa is crucial for determining appropriate treatment. Diagnosis of PCa primarily involves trans-perineal and transrectal systematic biopsies. Systematic transrectal prostate biopsy, which typically collects 10-12 tissue samples, is a standard method, but it can miss csPCa and is associated with some complications. Recent advancements, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies, have been suggested to improve risk stratification and reduce overtreatment of inPCa and undertreatment of csPCa, thereby enhancing patient quality of life and treatment outcomes. Guided biopsies are increasingly recommended for their ability to better detect high-risk cancers while reducing identification of low-risk cases. MRI-targeted biopsies, especially when used as an initial biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients and those under active surveillance, have become more common. Utilization of MRI-TB alone can decrease septic complications; however, the combining of targeted biopsies with perilesional sampling is recommended for optimal detection of csPCa. Future advancements in imaging and biopsy techniques, including AI-augmented lesion detection and robotic-assisted sampling, promise to further improve the accuracy and effectiveness of PCa detection.

A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body PET/CT imaging

PURPOSE

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of initial detection in patients with suspected primary prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Eighty-four patients who underwent Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging before treatment in our department were enrolled. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the prostate (SUVmax-PSMA), liver (SUVmax-PSMA-L), and mediastinal blood pool (SUVmax-PSMA-M) was measured using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body PET/CT imaging. The [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 derived metabolic tumor volume (MTV), the total lesion (TLP), and the cross-sectional areas of focal concentration in the prostate (CAP) were also determined. Besides, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and the above imaging characteristics were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves to identify the cutoff value to improve the diagnostic accuracy of suspected PCa. Finally, a multivariate regression analysis was conducted to discover the independent predictor to improve the diagnostic accuracy on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body imaging.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the PCa and Non-PCa groups in age, height, weight, injected dose, except for the PSA levels, the SUVmax-PSMA, TLP, MTV, and CAP. Besides, the SUVmax-PSMA-T/L and SUVmax-PSMA-T/M derived from SUVmax-PSMA were both significantly different. In addition, the areas under the curve of PSA levels, SUVmax-PSMA, SUVmax-PSMA-T/L, SUVmax-PSMA-T/M, TLP, MTV, and CAP to predict PCa on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 imaging were 0.620 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.485-0.755), 0.864 (95% CI 0.757-0.972), 0.819 (95% CI 0.704-0.935), 0.876 (95% CI 0.771-0.980), 0.845 (95% CI 0.741-0.949), 0.820 (95% CI 0.702-0.938), 0.627 (95% CI 0.499-0.754), respectively. However, a multivariate regression analysis showed that SUVmax-PSMA was an independent predictor, with a cutoff value of 11.5 and an odds ratio of 1.221.

CONCLUSION

The SUVmax-PSMA with a cutoff value of 11.5 was an independent predictor to improve the diagnostic accuracy of PCa on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body imaging.

Advances in surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor technologies for cancer biomarker detection

Surface plasmon resonance approach is a highly useful option to offer optical and label-free detection of target bioanalytes with numerous advantages (e.g., low-cost fabrication, appreciable sensitivity, label-free detection, and outstanding accuracy). As such, it allows early diagnosis of cancer biomarkers to monitor tumor progression and to prevent the recurrence of oncogenic tumors. This work highlights the recent progress in SPR biosensing technology for the diagnosis of various cancer types (e.g., lung, breast, prostate, and ovarian). Further, the performance of various SPR biosensors is also evaluated in terms of the basic quality assurance criteria (e.g., limit of detection (LOD), selectivity, sensor response time, and reusability). Finally, the limitations and future challenges associated with SPR biosensors are also discussed with respect to cancer biomarker detection.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Novel 29 MHz micro-ultrasound "ExactVuTM" for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A prospective single institutional study. A step forward in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

ExactVuTM is a real-time micro-ultrasound system which provides, according to the Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-Ultrasound protocol (PRI-MUS), a 300% higher resolution compared to conventional transrectal ultrasound. To evaluate the performance of ExactVuTM in the detection of Clinically significant Prostate Cancer (CsPCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with Prostate Cancer diagnosed at fusion biopsy were imaged with ExactVuTM. CsPCa was defined as any Gleason Score ≥ 3+4. ExactVuTM examination was considered as positive when PRI-MUS score was ≥ 3. PRI-MUS scoring system was considered as correct when the fusion biopsy was positive for CsPCa. A transrectal fusion biopsy- proven CsPCa was considered as a gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated.

RESULTS

57 patients out of 68 (84%) had a csPCa. PRI-MUS score was correctly assessed in 68% of cases. Regarding the detection of CsPCa, ExactVuTM 's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 68%, 73%, 93%, and 31%, respectively and the AUC was 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0-8). For detecting CsPCa in the transition/ anterior zone the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 45%, 66%, 83% and 25% respectively ant the AUC was 0.5 (95% CI 0.2-0.9). Accounting only the CsPCa located in the peripheral zone, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV raised up to 74%, 75%, 94%, 33%, respectively with AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.5-0-9).

CONCLUSIONS

ExactVuTM provides high resolution of the prostatic peripheral zone and could represent a step forward in the detection of CsPCa as a triage tool. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results.

Artificial intelligence in multiparametric prostate cancer imaging with focus on deep-learning methods

Prostate cancer represents today the most typical example of a pathology whose diagnosis requires multiparametric imaging, a strategy where multiple imaging techniques are combined to reach an acceptable diagnostic performance. However, the reviewing, weighing and coupling of multiple images not only places additional burden on the radiologist, it also complicates the reviewing process. Prostate cancer imaging has therefore been an important target for the development of computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tools. In this survey, we discuss the advances in CAD for prostate cancer over the last decades with special attention to the deep-learning techniques that have been designed in the last few years. Moreover, we elaborate and compare the methods employed to deliver the CAD output to the operator for further medical decision making.

ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give oncology teams, patients, policymakers and managers an overview of essential care throughout the patient journey.

PROSTATE CANCER

Prostate cancer is the second most common male cancer and has a wide variation in outcomes in Europe. It has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges, and is a major healthcare burden. Care must only be a carried out in prostate/urology cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.

Role of sonoelastography in assessment of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of shear-wave elastography (SWE) and strain elastography (SE) for axillary lymph nodes (ALNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until September 2018. Weighted mean difference was calculated for continuous variables. The accuracy of sonoelastography was assessed by calculating pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). All data were analysed using Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1,038 ALNs were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies evaluated the use of SE, and the other five evaluated the SWE. The SWE stiffness values of malignant ALNs were significantly higher than those of benign nodes. Both SE and SWE have relatively high specificity and sensitivity. The max stiffness in SWE showed the highest specificity (0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.98), PLR (12.1; 95% CI, 4-36.5), NLR (0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69), AUC (0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and DOR (42; 95% CI, 12-154); in contrast, the mean stiffness showed the highest sensitivity (0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91).

CONCLUSION

Sonoelastography demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between malignant and benign ALNs. The max and mean stiffness on SWE appeared to exhibit the highest accuracy. Thus, SWE is an effective accompaniment to sentinel node biopsy, and is appropriate for preoperative assessment of ALNs in the post-Z0011 era.

Technetium-99m SPECT/US Hybrid Imaging Compared with Conventional Diagnostic Thyroid Imaging with Scintigraphy and Ultrasound

Side-by-side evaluation of thyroid ultrasound (US) and ^99mTcO₄ scintigraphy can lead to uncertainties in the correct topographic assignment of thyroid nodules. The aim of this study was to evaluate ^99mTcO₄ single-photon emission computed tomography/ultrasound (SPECT/US) fusion imaging. Seventy-nine patients were prospectively investigated. If conventional diagnostics of the thyroid gland (B-mode-US, scintigraphy) produced unclear findings, SPECT was performed and transferred to a US device for real-time sensor-navigated 3-D fusion US investigation. The data sets were manually matched according to their contours. Finally, SPECT/US versus conventional diagnostics was rated using an ordinal 4-point scale (SPECT/US >> conventional diagnostics, SPECT/US > conventional diagnostics, SPECT/US = conventional diagnostics, SPECT/US < conventional diagnostics). SPECT/US was superior (>>, >) in 84% and equivalent (=) in 16% of the cases, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for uni-, bi- and multinodular goiters (p ≥ 0.3). In 67%, the respective problem that arose after conventional diagnostics was clarified by SPECT/US. SPECT/US was feasible and was helpful for the clarification of uncertain functionality assessments of thyroid nodules.

Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, is an alternative test to systematic transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men suspected of having prostate cancer. At present, evidence on which test to use is insufficient to inform detailed evidence-based decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the index tests MRI only, MRI-targeted biopsy, the MRI pathway (MRI with or without MRI-targeted biopsy) and systematic biopsy as compared to template-guided biopsy as the reference standard in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer as the target condition, defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 or higher. Secondary target conditions were the detection of grade 1 and grade 3 or higher-grade prostate cancer, and a potential change in the number of biopsy procedures.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive systematic literature search up to 31 July 2018. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, eight other databases and one trials register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion any cross-sectional study if it investigated one or more index tests verified by the reference standard, or if it investigated the agreement between the MRI pathway and systematic biopsy, both performed in the same men. We included only studies on men who were biopsy naïve or who previously had a negative biopsy (or a mix of both). Studies involving MRI had to report on both MRI-positive and MRI-negative men. All studies had to report on the primary target condition.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. To estimate test accuracy, we calculated sensitivity and specificity using the bivariate model. To estimate agreement between the MRI pathway and systematic biopsy, we synthesised detection ratios by performing random-effects meta-analyses. To estimate the proportions of participants with prostate cancer detected by only one of the index tests, we used random-effects multinomial or binary logistic regression models. For the main comparisions, we assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

The test accuracy analyses included 18 studies overall.MRI compared to template-guided biopsy: Based on a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 0.95; 12 studies; low certainty of evidence) and a pooled specificity of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.46; 12 studies; low certainty of evidence) using a baseline prevalence of 30%, MRI may result in 273 (95% CI: 249 to 285) true positives, 441 false positives (95% CI: 378 to 497), 259 true negatives (95% CI: 203 to 322) and 27 (95% CI: 15 to 51) false negatives per 1000 men. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and inconsistency.MRI-targeted biopsy compared to template-guided biopsy: Based on a pooled sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.87; 8 studies; low certainty of evidence) and a pooled specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97; 8 studies; low certainty of evidence) using a baseline prevalence of 30%, MRI-targeted biopsy may result in 240 (95% CI: 207 to 261) true positives, 42 (95% CI: 21 to 70) false positives, 658 (95% CI: 630 to 679) true negatives and 60 (95% CI: 39 to 93) false negatives per 1000 men. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and inconsistency.The MRI pathway compared to template-guided biopsy: Based on a pooled sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.82; 8 studies; low certainty of evidence) and a pooled specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.98; 8 studies; low certainty of evidence) using a baseline prevalence of 30%, the MRI pathway may result in 216 (95% CI: 180 to 246) true positives, 28 (95% CI: 14 to 42) false positives, 672 (95% CI: 658 to 686) true negatives and 84 (95% CI: 54 to 120) false negatives per 1000 men. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision.Systemic biopsy compared to template-guided biopsy: Based on a pooled sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.93; 4 studies; low certainty of evidence) and a pooled specificity of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.91 to 1.00; 4 studies; low certainty of evidence) using a baseline prevalence of 30%, systematic biopsy may result in 189 (95% CI: 57 to 279) true positives, 0 (95% CI: 0 to 63) false positives, 700 (95% CI: 637 to 700) true negatives and 111 (95% CI: 21 to 243) false negatives per 1000 men. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and inconsistency.Agreement analyses: In a mixed population of both biopsy-naïve and prior-negative biopsy men comparing the MRI pathway to systematic biopsy, we found a pooled detection ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.23; 25 studies). We found pooled detection ratios of 1.44 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.75; 10 studies) in prior-negative biopsy men and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.16; 20 studies) in biopsy-naïve men.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Among the diagnostic strategies considered, the MRI pathway has the most favourable diagnostic accuracy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Compared to systematic biopsy, it increases the number of significant cancer detected while reducing the number of insignificant cancer diagnosed. The certainty in our findings was reduced by study limitations, specifically issues surrounding selection bias, as well as inconsistency. Based on these findings, further improvement of prostate cancer diagnostic pathways should be pursued.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has evolved from the use of agitated saline to second generation bioengineered microbubbles designed to withstand insonation with limited destruction. While only one of these newer agents is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use outside echocardiography, interventional radiologists are increasingly finding off-label uses for ultrasound contrast agents. Notably, these agents have an extremely benign safety profile with no hepatic or renal toxicities and no radiation exposure. Alongside diagnostic applications, CEUS has begun to develop its own niche within the realm of interventional oncology. Certainly, the characterization of focal solid organ lesions (such as hepatic and renal lesions) by CEUS has been an important development. However, interventional oncologists are finding that the dynamic and real-time information afforded by CEUS can improve biopsy guidance, ablation therapy, and provide early evidence of tumor viability after locoregional therapy. Even more novel uses of CEUS include lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node localization. Critical areas of research still exist. The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of the emerging roles of CEUS in interventional oncology.

99mTc-Pertechnetate-SPECT/US Hybrid Imaging Enhances Diagnostic Certainty Compared With Conventional Thyroid Imaging With Scintigraphy and Ultrasound

Evaluation of thyroid ultrasound and Tc-pertechnetate scintigraphy side by side frequently produces ambiguous results regarding the correct assignment of anatomy and functionality of a nodule. We describe the usefulness of Tc-pertechnetate-SPECT/US-fusion imaging. A 75-year-old woman was referred for exclusion of cold nodules. After conventional diagnostics (in vitro thyroid parameters, B mode-US, planar Tc-pertechnetate-thyroid scintigraphy), a SPECT was performed using a conventional gamma camera. The SPECT data set was transferred to an ultrasound device (LOGIQ E9), and sensor-navigated 3D ultrasound was performed. Both data sets (SPECT/US) were fused in real time, revealing the exact functional state of multiple nodules.

Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology

As the development of modalities for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging advances, the challenge of accurate registration between images and histopathologic ground truth becomes more pressing. Localization of PCa, rather than detection, requires a pixel-to-pixel validation of imaging based on histopathology after radical prostatectomy. Such a registration procedure is challenging for ultrasound modalities; not only the deformations of the prostate after resection have to be taken into account, but also the deformation due to the employed transrectal probe and the mismatch in orientation between imaging planes and pathology slices. In this work, we review the latest techniques to facilitate accurate validation of PCa localization in ultrasound imaging studies and extrapolate a general strategy for implementation of a registration procedure.

The standards of an ultrasound examination of the prostate gland. Part 2

The paper discusses the rules of the proper performing of the ultrasound examination of the prostate gland. It has been divided into two parts: the general part and the detailed part. The first part presents the necessary requirements related to the ultrasound equipment needed for performing transabdominal and transrectal examinations of the prostate gland. The second part presents the application of the ultrasound examination in benign prostatic hyperplasia, in cases of prostate inflammation and in prostate cancer. Ultrasound examinations applied in the diagnostics of benign prostatic hyperplasia accelerated the diagnosis, facilitated the qualification to surgery and the selection of the treatment method. The assessment of the size of the prostate gland performed using the endorectal ultrasound examination is helpful in making the choice between transurethral electroresection and adenomectomy. In prostate inflammation this examination should be performed with particular gentleness due to pain ailments. The indication for performing the examination in acute inflammation is the suspicion of prostate abscess. In chronic, exacerbating prostatitis it is possible to perform an intraprostatic antibiotic injection. In the recent years increased morbidity and detectability of prostate gland cancer is observed among men. In Poland it ranks second (13%) among diseases occurring in men. The indication for an endorectal examination is the necessity to assess the size of the prostate gland, its configuration, the echostructure in classical ultrasonography, the vascularization in an ultrasound examination performed with power doppler and, if possible, the differences in the gland tissue firmness (consistency) in elastography. The ultrasound examination is used for performing the mapping biopsy of the prostate gland - from routine, strictly defined locations, the targeted biopsy - from locations suspected of neoplastic proliferation and the staging biopsy - from the neurovascular bundles, the seminal vesicles, from the apex of the prostate and from the periprostatic tissue - this type of biopsy is supposed to help in determining local staging of the neoplastic disease. The ultrasound examination is also helpful during the treatment of the neoplasm performed using brachytherapy or using the method of ultrasonic ablation which is still in the phase of clinical trials.

The standards of an ultrasound examination of the prostate gland. Part 1

The article discusses the principles of the proper performance of the ultrasound examination of the prostate gland. The paper has been divided into two parts: the general one and the detailed one. The first part presents the necessary requirements referring to the ultrasound apparatus for performing transabdominal examinations of the urinary bladder and the prostate gland as well as for transrectal examinations of the prostate gland. The paper also describes the techniques of performing both examinations together with the methods of measuring the capacity of the urinary bladder and the volume of the prostate gland. It also mentions the most frequent indications for performing the examinations as well as diagnostic algorithms applied in case of finding irregularities. The transabdominal ultrasonography is a part of the examination of the abdominal organs and it should be performed in patients complaining of dysuric symptoms. An addition to the examination, especially when the prostate gland is enlarged, should be the measurement of the capacity of the urinary bladder and the assessment of the amount of residual urine after voiding. The indications for the endosonographic examination of the prostate gland are patological changes found in the per rectum examination, elevated concentration of the prostate-specific antigen in the blood serum, cancer and inflammations of the prostate gland if an abscess is suspected, qualification for surgery in the course of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the diagnostics of disorders of ejaculation. A standard procedure performed in case of prostate cancer for the purpose of obtaining specimens for the histopathology examination is biopsy carried out with transrectal ultrasound imaging. The paper presents the indications and techniques of performing prostate biopsy, as well as the types of biopsies together with the necessary preparation and the protection against its side effects for the patient. The paper also lists the necessary elements of the description of the presented procedures. The second part of the paper presents the application of the ultrasound examination in benign prostatic hyperplasia, in cases of inflammation and in prostate cancer.

How to Perform Image-guided Prostate Biopsy: In-bore and Fusion Approaches

The integration of magnetic resonance imaging into urologic routine may be highly beneficial and change our standards for prostate cancer treatment.