Functional Comparison of Renal Tumor Enucleation Versus Standard Partial Nephrectomy

Robotic-assisted enucleation for renal masses: A comparison of on-clamp and off-clamp approach

INTRODUCTION

In surgically excising renal masses, studies have demonstrated that tumor enucleation is an effective option. However, there is limited literature comparing off-clamp to on-clamp tumor enucleation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 189 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy via tumor enucleation by a single surgeon from March 2012 and April 2022. Patients were stratified based on use of renal hilar clamping intraoperatively. Surgical, oncologic, and renal functional outcomes were captured. Variables were analyzed and compared between the two groups using Student's T-tests and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Of 189 procedures analyzed, 124 were performed on-clamp and 65 were performed off-clamp. There were no differences in patient demographics or average length of follow-up. There were no differences in estimated blood loss, complications, or hospital length of stay. Recurrence rates were similar for the two groups. The absolute difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate change between the two groups at time of first follow-up was not significant (p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in perioperative outcomes such as surgical time, blood loss, or complications between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in postoperative kidney function between the two techniques.

The evolution of tumor enucleation partial nephrectomy: A comparison of perioperative outcomes for sutureless hemostatic bandage as an alternative to standard renorrhaphy

BACKGROUND

The standard approach to hemostasis during partial nephrectomy (PN) is to perform suture renorrhaphy (SR). Application of a hemostatic bandage (HB) is an alternative to minimize blood loss and devitalized renal parenchyma. We aim to evaluate perioperative outcomes of PN with tumor enucleation (TE) comparing SR to HB.

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 195 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic PN with TE performed at a tertiary referral center (2012-2022). Hemostasis was obtained with SR in 54 patients while 141 patients underwent application of HB consisting of Surgicel®, Gelfoam® soaked in thrombin, and Floseal®.

RESULTS

SR patients had tumors of greater complexity by RENAL nephrometry score compared to HB patients (p < 0.001). Operative time (141 vs. 183 min, p < 0.001), warm ischemia time (11.6 vs. 24.2 min, p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (37 vs. 214 mL, p < 0.001), and length of stay (1.2 vs. 1.8 days, p < 0.001) favored HB. There was no significant difference in Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications (p = 0.22). Renal function was comparable with mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of 0.66 and 0.54 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 3 months postoperatively for HB and SR, respectively (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of an HB is a safe alternative to SR for hemostasis following PN with TE in appropriately selected patients.

Robot-assisted Simple Enucleation Versus Standard Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Low- or Intermediate-complexity, Clinical T1 Renal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Although partial nephrectomy has become the gold standard for T1 renal tumors whenever technically feasible, simple enucleation has shown superior results. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials comparing these two surgical approaches have been published.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical margin status for robot-assisted simple enucleation (RASE) and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (sRAPN) for clinical T1 renal tumors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. A total of 380 patients aged 18-80 yr with newly diagnosed, sporadic, unilateral clinical T1 renal tumors (RENAL score <10) were enrolled and randomized to RASE or sRAPN. The primary endpoint was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, with a noninferiority margin of 7.5% set. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03624673).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We defined noninferiority for RASE versus standard RAPN as an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) bound of <7.5% for the difference in the proportion of patients with a PSM.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A cohort of 380 patients was enrolled and randomly assigned to RASE (n = 190) or sRAPN (n = 190). On intention-to-treat analysis for patients with malignant tumors, 2.3% of patients in the RASE group and 3.0% in the sRAPN group had a PSM. The RASE group showed noninferiority to the sRAPN group within a 7.5% margin (difference -0.7%, 95% CI -4.0% to 2.7%). Per-protocol analysis also demonstrated noninferiority of RASE. The RASE group had a shorter median operative time (145 vs 155 min; p = 0.018) and a lower rate of tumor bed suturing (8.9% vs 43%; p < 0.001) in comparison to the sRAPN group. Estimated blood loss was considerably lower in the sRAPN group than in the RASE group (p = 0.046). The rate of recurrence did not differ between the groups (p > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

RASE for the management of low- to intermediate-complexity tumors is noninferior to sRAPN in terms of the PSM rate. Long-term follow-up is needed to draw conclusions regarding oncological outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We carried out a trial to compare simple tumor enucleation versus partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. The outcome we assessed was the proportion of patients with a positive surgical margin. Our results show that simple tumor enucleation is not inferior to partial nephrectomy for this outcome. Longer follow-up is needed to assess other cancer control outcomes.

Risk of pseudoaneurysm and bleeding complications after partial nephrectomy: comparison of tumor enucleation to standard margin technique

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard for the resection of amenable small renal masses. Some surgeons have adopted tumor enucleation (TE) over the standard margin PN (SPN) technique based on preservation of healthy renal parenchyma by following the tumor pseudocapsule. However, TE may also confer additional advantages due to avoidance of sharp incision including reduction in perioperative and bleeding complications. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of pseudoaneurysms and other complications following TE vs. SPN. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PN (TE and SPN) between 2008 and 2020 was conducted. Baseline characteristics were compared between the TE and SPN cohorts with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 534 patients were included, 195 (36.5%) receiving TE and 339 (63.5%) SPN. There were no differences in baseline patient demographics. There was no difference in RENAL nephrometry scores between the two groups (p = 0.47). TE had lower rates of postoperative complications (11.3 vs. 21.5%, p = 0.002). TE had less bleeding complications (2.1 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002) with no pseudoaneurysm events following TE compared to 12 following SPN (0.0 vs. 3.5%, p = 0.008). Need for interventional radiology largely reflected pseudoaneurysm differences (0 (0.0%) TE vs. 13 (3.8%) SPN, p = 0.006. Readmission occurred less often after TE vs. SPN (4.1 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.07). Patients receiving TE experienced no clinically significant pseudoaneurysm formation and were less likely to have any bleeding complication or major complication postoperatively. TE may be preferred when minimizing morbidity aligns with patient selection and preferences.

SAVE Testis-sparing score: a multicenter retrospective study of a novel predictive tool for quantifying testicular tumors

BACKGROUND

Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is a safe treatment for patients with benign testicular tumors. Presently, assessments for evaluating the suitability of TSS are poorly standardized, partially because testicular anatomical elements cannot be quantitatively described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors developed a scoring method known as the SAVE testis-sparing score based on four critical and accessible anatomical features of a testicular tumor. The SAVE score ranges from 0 to 8 and is divided into four risk classes ( low , medium , high , and extremely high ) to evaluate the feasibility of TSS, wherein low-risk indicates high feasibility and vice versa. This study included 444 testicular tumor patients from eight centers. Among them, 216 patients (model group: 151 patients, validation group: 65 patients) were included in the modeling analysis, and the other 228 patients from children's centers were included in the proportion analysis. Using retrospective data, patient characteristics associated with surgical methods were identified. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was built quantify the associations between these characteristics and the surgery method. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the classification efficiency of SAVE.

RESULTS

The SAVE testis-sparing score includes size (tumor size as maximal diameter), available testicular tissue volume, volume ratio of the tumor to the testis, and the exophytic / endophytic properties of the tumor. The SAVE scoring system accurately classified the suitability of TSS based on the complexity of benign testicular tumors.

CONCLUSION

The SAVE score is a reproducible and robust tool for quantitatively describing the anatomical characteristics of benign testicular tumors and guide the preoperative evaluation of TSS.

Long-Term Renal Function Following Renal Cancer Surgery: Historical Perspectives, Current Status, and Future Considerations

Knowledge of functional recovery after partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy for renal cancer has advanced considerably, with PN now established as the reference standard for most localized renal masses. However, it is still unclear whether PN provides an overall survival benefit in patients with a normal contralateral kidney. While early studies seemingly demonstrated the importance of minimizing warm-ischemia time during PN, multiple new investigations over the last 10 years have proven that parenchymal mass lost is the most important predictor of new baseline renal function. Minimizing loss of parenchymal mass during resection and reconstruction is the most important controllable aspect of long-term post-operative renal function preservation.

Imaging Features of Renal Masses to Select Optimal Candidates for Tumor Enucleation Partial Nephrectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper was to critically evaluate preoperative findings that optimally select candidates for renal tumor enucleation partial nephrectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tumor enucleation has been widely accepted as a management option for patients with chronic kidney disease, hereditary renal cell carcinoma, or multifocal disease. Recent evidence suggests safety and efficacy in the management of routine small renal masses. With recent advances in imaging, the literature for ruling out aggressive renal cell carcinoma and selection for tumor enucleation is robust. As the incidence of renal cell carcinoma rises, partial nephrectomy continues to be the mainstay of treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Tumor enucleation maximizes preservation of renal parenchyma without hindering oncologic outcomes. It is important to recognize key tumor radiologic findings which urologists may use to optimize patient selection for tumor enucleation.

Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus standard margin partial nephrectomy: Perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes for low and intermediate complexity renal masses

PURPOSE

Standard margin partial nephrectomy (SPN) with sharp incision across normal renal parenchyma carries perioperative morbidity and renal functional implications. Tumor enucleation (TE) is an alternative approach using a natural plane of dissection around the tumor pseudocapsule to maximize parenchymal preservation. We compared perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes for robotic-assisted TE to SPN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing robotic-assisted TE or SPN were included (2008-2020). Baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were compared. Perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes were assessed for comparative effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients were included with 176 (37.7%) TE and 291 (62.3%) SPN. Baseline characteristics and final histology were comparable; 18% of patients had baseline stage 3 chronic kidney disease. TE had lower median blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and fewer complications compared to SPN. Positive margin rates were higher for TE vs. SPN (8.5% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.04) with similar recurrence rates (2.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.48) and no difference in cancer-specific or overall survival with median 4.0 years follow-up. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was comparable (76.1 vs. 78.2, P = 0.63) while renal function in the first year was better preserved with TE (74.6 vs. 68.1, P < 0.001) showing an 8-point estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.001) advantage after adjustment. The rate of stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease by 12 months was lower for TE compared to SPN (21.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

TE is an alternative approach to SPN associated with favorable perioperative and renal functional outcomes. While positive margin rates are higher, longer-term recurrence rates are no different suggesting pseudocapsule disruption during TE has limited impact on oncologic outcomes.

Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tumor enucleation (TE) compared with partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1 renal cell carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

According to protocol, we searched multiple data sources for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) in any language. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and rated the certainty of the evidence (CoE) using the GRADE framework.

Results

We are uncertain about the effects of TE on perioperative (mean difference [MD] 3.38, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.23; I²=68%; 4 NRSs; 942 participants; very low CoE) and long-term (MD 2.31, 95% CI -1.40 to 6.01; I²=57%; 4 NRSs; 542 participants; very low CoE) residual renal function. TE may result in little to no difference in short-term residual renal function (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.83; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 256 participants; low CoE). We are uncertain about the effects of TE on cancer-specific mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.90, 95% CI: 0.11 to 7.28; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 551 participants; very low CoE) and major adverse events (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.79; I²=0%; 10 NRS; 2,360 participants; very low CoE).

Conclusions

While TE appears to have similar effects on short term postoperative residual renal function, there were uncertainties on mortality and major adverse events. However, we need rigorous RCTs to elucidate the effects of TE as the evidence stems mostly from NRSs.

Comparison of Tumor Enucleation and Standard Partial Nephrectomy According to Trifecta Outcomes: A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Academy of Urology, Uro-Oncology Working Group

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the impact of the resection technique (tumor enucleation (TE) or standard partial nephrectomy (SPN)) on trifecta outcomes in patients having undergone partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathologic parameters in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (pT1-2N0M0) who had undergone PN between January 2001-December 2018 at one of 15 different tertiary referral centers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate independent predictors of trifecta failure, decreased postoperative renal functions (decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 10%), perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 1), and positive surgical margins.

RESULTS

A total of 1070 patients with a mean age 56.11 ± 11.88 years were included in our study. PN was performed with TE in 848 (79.25%) and SPN in 222 (20.75%) patients. Trifecta failure rate was 56.2% for TE and 64.4% for SPN (p = 0.028). On multivariable analysis, TE was associated with less trifecta failure (p = 0.025) and eGFR decrease >10% rates (p = 0.024). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference between TE and SPN according to positive surgical margins (p = 0.450) and complication > Clavien-Dindo grade 1 (p = 0.888) rates. The only independent predictive factor for complications > Clavien-Dindo 1 was the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TE is associated with less trifecta failure than SPN. This result is mainly due to better preservation of renal function with TE.

Greater Renal Function Benefit from Enucleation Technique for More Complex Renal Tumors in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Background: Tumor enucleation technique in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) reportedly contributes to renal function preservation. Which tumors and which part to utilize this technique have not been determined. Patients and Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients who underwent RAPN at tertiary surgery centers. Patients were first stratified into High, Intermediate, and Low categories based on renal nephrometry score. Patients were further classified into I/B-enucleation (I/B-E, I + B ≤ 1) and I/B-resection (I/B-R, I + B ≥ 2) groups based on surface-intermediate-base margin score. Perioperative outcomes, including percentile change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), new-onset chronic kidney disease, complication rate, surgical margin, and trifecta achievement, were compared between the I/B-E and I/B-R groups in each category. Odds ratios (ORs) and β-coefficients were also compared. Results: Overall, 704 patients were included in this study. Relative decrease in eGFR was significantly lower for the I/B-E group in all three categories, with medians of 8.1%, 4.4%, and 3.2% in the High, Intermediate, and Low, respectively. In multivariate analyses, excision technique was independently associated with eGFR change in all three. β-coefficient was higher in the High (5.06) category than in the Low (3.17) or Intermediate (3.33). Across all three categories, significantly more patients attained trifecta with a difference of 34.0%, 18.3%, and 15.1% in the High, Intermediate, and Low categories, respectively (all, p < 0.05), with a higher OR in the High (5.91) category than in the Low (3.20) or Intermediate (2.48). No significant differences were found in operation time, amount of estimated blood loss, rate of positive surgical margin, or complications. Warm ischemic time was significantly longer for the I/B-E group in the Intermediate (18.0 minutes vs 16.0 minutes, p = 0.002) and Low categories (13.0 vs 11.0, p = 0.006), but not significant in High (p = 0.344). Conclusions: I/B-enucleation in RAPN contributes to renal function preservation, and the impact was more emphasized in complex tumors.

X-Capsular Incision for Tumor Enucleation (X-CITE)-Technique: A Method to Maximize Renal Parenchymal Preservation for Completely Endophytic Renal Tumors

OBJECTIVE

To describe the X-Capsular Incision for Tumor Enucleation (X-CITE) technique to resect endophytic renal tumors while preserving the overlying renal parenchyma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 1-year outcomes of 12 consecutive patients with a history of bilateral or multifocal renal tumors who presented to our institution with completely endophytic renal masse(s) between August 2017 and August 2018. Endophytic tumors were resected by making an X-shaped incision in the renal capsule and developing parenchymal flaps overlying the tumor pseudocapsule. Following tumor enucleation, the overlying parenchymal flaps were reapproximated.

RESULTS

Median follow up was 19.9 months (range 10.6-14.9). Most patients also had additional exophytic tumors with a median of 5 renal tumors removed per operation with a median largest renal tumor size of 3.2 cm. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. There was no decline in renal function after surgery when comparing median pre- and 12-month postoperative eGFR (94.5 vs 91.5, P= 0.18).). Postoperative nuclear mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renal scans demonstrated equal differential kidney function after surgery. Limitations include short-term follow-up and referral bias at center specializing in multi-focal kidney surgery.

CONCLUSION

The X-Capsular Incision for Tumor Enucleation technique is feasible, safe and effective with minimal collateral damage in the treatment of completely endophytic renal masses. Further investigation should identify which patients may benefit from this procedure and explore intermediate and long-term outcomes.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Tumor Enucleation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Tumor enucleation (TE) optimizes parenchymal preservation with promising short-term oncologic outcomes compared with standard partial nephrectomy (SPN). However, researches/literatures about long-term oncologic outcomes for TE after minimally invasive surgery are scarce. We aim to analyze long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and robotic tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 146 patients who underwent TE with either laparoscopic or robotic approach for localized RCC in our center. Local recurrence, cancer specific survival (CSS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were the main outcomes. Survival curves were generated using a Kaplan-Meier method. Perioperative outcomes and pathological outcomes were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 98 male and 48 female patients were eligible for the study. The median tumor size was 3.4 cm with a median R.E.N.A.L. score of seven. Warm ischemia was used in 143 patients with a median ischemia time of 20 min and three patients had zero ischemia. Five patients (3.4%) had major complications (> Clavien IIIa) and only two were related to urinary system. The median global glomerular filtration rate (GFR) preserved after surgery was 93%. Pseudocapsule invasion was reported in 50 tumors (34%) and positive surgical margins were found in 3/146 (2.1%) tumors. At a median follow-up of 66 months, local recurrence happened in two patients (1.4%), and systemic recurrence happened in six patients (4.2%). The 5-year CSS, RFS, OS were 95.7, 89.6, and 91.9%, and the 10-year CSS, RFS, OS were 93.8, 89.6, and 90.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that tumor enucleation with laparoscopic or robotic approach in experienced hands for the treatment of RCC appears oncologically safe with a median follow-up of more than 5 years. Prospective studies with more patients and longer follow-up will be required to further evaluate oncologic safety after TE.

Endophytic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Robot-Assisted Surgery: Functional Outcomes - A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has gained increasing popularity during the last decade. An endophytic renal tumour represents a surgical technical challenge in terms of identification and resection related to the lack of external visual cues on the kidney surface.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There is little evidence of functional outcomes of robotic surgery on treating endophytic masses. For this reason, we wanted to review the contemporary literature on the functional outcomes of endophytic RCC treated with robotic surgery.

RESULTS

Many studies investigating robotic partial nephrectomy for totally endophytic RCC confirmed the good functional results of this approach at intermediate follow-up. The greater relative importance of volume loss versus ischaemia duration in predicting long-term renal function after partial nephrectomy is now established, and the robotic technique may facilitate volume preservation. Accurate use of intra-operative ultrasonography, enucleation, and intra-operative techniques using near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green dye could minimize excision of the parenchyma and prevent devascularization of adjacent healthy parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

Unfortunately, the overall quality of the literature evidence and the high risk of selection bias limit the possibility of any causal interpretation about the relationship between the surgical technique used and functional outcomes.

The Use of Tissue Adhesive for Tumor Bed Closure during Partial Nephrectomy is Associated with Reduced Devascularized Functional Volume Loss

Objectives

To quantitatively compare the functional renal volume loss, following nephron sparing surgery (NSS) between patients in whom tumor bed closure was done by biological tissue adhesive and those who were managed by standard suture technique.

Methods

From our institutional NSS database we retrospectively collected patients who had two sequential quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography of ^99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid uptake studies, the first study immediately before surgery and the second one 3-6 months following surgery. The study group included 69 patients: 26 (37.7%) patients in the sealant group (BioGlue®) and 43 (62.3%) patients in the standard suture group.

Results

No statistically significant differences were noted in the baseline clinical and pathological characteristics of the studied groups. However, there were several statistically significant differences in operative variables: patients in the suture group had larger amount of blood loss (3-fold), longer ischemia time (26.6 vs. 21 minutes,) and slightly longer operation time. Patients in whom tumor bed was closed by sutures had nearly 3-fold higher parenchymal loss compared to patients managed by sealant (26.28 vs. 8.92 ml, p = 0.048).

Conclusions

The use of tissue sealant during tumor bed reconstruction is associated with reduced devascularized parenchymal mass loss and should be considered among modifiable surgical factors during NSS.

Tumor Enucleation vs. Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Tumor enucleation (TE) and partial nephrectomy (PN) have both become main treatment strategies for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC), despite the discrepancy between their safety margin. We performed a meta-analysis on all the relevant trials in order to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of TE with those of PN for RCC treatment. Methods: In this meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials or retrospective studies were included if they compared TE and PN therapy in patients with localized renal cancer. The main outcomes extracted were perioperative data and post-operative outcomes. Subgroups for analyses were undertaken according to tumor size and duration of follow up. Data were pooled using the generic variance method with a fixed or random effects model and expressed as mean differences or odds ratios with 95% CI. Results: A total of 13 studies containing 1,792 patients undergoing TE and 3,068 undergoing PN were identified. Our study showed that the patients received TE had significantly shorter operative time (MD = -28.46, 95% CI = -42.09, -14.83, P < 0.0001), less hospital day (MD = -0.68, 95% CI = -1.04, -0.31, P = 0.0003), less estimate blood loss (MD = -59.90, 95% CI = -93.23, -26.58, P = 0.0004) and smaller change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (fixed effect: MD = 4.66, 95% CI = 1.67, 7.66, P = 0.002), fewer complications (fixed effect: OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.50, 0.85, P = 0.001) compared with those received PN. However, there were no significant differences in terms of warm ischemic time, positive margin rates, recurrence rates and survival rates between the two groups. All the subgroup analyses presented consistent results with the overall analyses. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that TE is not only less-traumatizing and beneficial for recovery, but also better for renal function protection. Moreover, it did not show the evidence of an increase relapse rate or mortality rate when compared with PN.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to identify pseudocapsule invasion in renal tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate accuracy of MRI in detecting renal tumor pseudocapsule (PC) invasion and to propose a classification based on imaging of PC status in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 2017 to June 2018, 58 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma were prospectively enrolled. MRI was performed preoperatively and PC was classified, according to its features, as follows: MRI-Cap 0 (absence of PC), MRI-Cap 1 (presence of a clearly identifiable PC), MRI-Cap 2 (focally interrupted PC), and MRI-Cap 3 (clearly interrupted and infiltrated PC). A 3D image reconstruction showing MRI-Cap score was provided to both surgeon and pathologist to obtain complete preoperative evaluation and to compare imaging and pathology reports. All patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In surgical specimens, PC was classified according to the renal tumor capsule invasion scoring system (i-Cap).

RESULTS

A concordance between MRI-Cap and i-Cap was found in 50/58 (86%) cases. ρ coefficient for each MRI-cap and iCap categories was: MRI-Cap 0: 0.89 (p < 0.0001), MRI-Cap1: 0.75 (p < 0.0001), MRI-Cap 2: 0.76 (p < 0.0001), and MRI-Cap3: 0.87 (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were: MRI-Cap 0: Se 97.87% Spec 83.3%, PPV 95.8%, NPV 90.9%, and AUC 90.9; MRI-Cap 1: Se 77% Spec 95.5%, PPV 83.3%, NPV 93.5%, and AUC 0.86; MRI-Cap 2- iCap 2: Se 88% Spec 90%, PPV 79%, NPV 95%, and AUC 0.89; MRI-Cap 3: Se 94% Spec 95%, PPV 88%, NPV 97%, and AUC 0.94.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-Cap classification is accurate in evaluating renal tumor PC features. PC features can provide an imaging-guided landmark to figure out where a minimal margin could be preferable during nephron-sparing surgery.

Tumor Enucleation is Appropriate During Partial Nephrectomy: Against

Tumor enucleation has been proposed as an alternative approach during partial nephrectomy. While enucleation is a useful technique in select patients, there are insufficient data to advocate for its use on a routine basis.

Tumor Enucleation Is Appropriate During Partial Nephrectomy

Tumor enucleation is oncologically safe and has the potential to meet the essential requirements for conservative surgery: (1) to widen the indications to tumors with unfavorable nephrometry; (2) to be well suited for minimally invasive surgery; and (3) to maximize the volume of parenchyma preserved.

Optimization of renal function preservation during robotic partial nephrectomy

Over the past few years, the role of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) has exponentially grown. Multiple recognized factors contribute to postoperative renal function in patients undergoing RPN. The aim of this review is to identify these potential factors, and to evaluate strategies that may help optimize the goal of renal function preservation. A nonsystematic literature review was performed to retrieve the most recent evidence on factors contributing to renal function post-RPN. Analyzed elements include baseline factors (tumor complexity and patient characteristics), intraoperative (surgical) factors (control of the renal hilum and type of ischemia, resection technique, renorrhaphy technique), and pharmacotherapeutics. In conclusion, the advantages of robotic surgery in the setting of partial nephrectomy (PN) are becoming well established. Maximal preservation of renal function remains a priority goal of the procedure, and it is influenced by a plethora of factors. Adequate patient selection using radiomics, control of comorbidities, utilization of evidence-based intraoperative techniques/strategies, and postoperative care are key components of postoperative preservation of renal function. Further investigations regarding these factors and their effects on long-term renal function are necessary and will continue to aid in guiding appropriate patient care.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Tumor-parenchyma interface and long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic tumor enucleation for sporadic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Tumor enucleation has been shown to be oncologically safe for elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC); yet, evidence on long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic tumor enucleation is lacking. In this study we provide a detailed histopathological analysis of tumor-parenchyma interface and the long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic tumor enucleation for sporadic RCC in a high-volume referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected consecutive patients undergoing robotic tumor enucleation for sporadic RCC by experienced surgeons with at least 4 years of follow-up. Pattern of pseudocapsule (PC) invasion, thickness of healthy renal margin removed with the tumor, margin status and recurrence rate were the main study endpoints. Multivariable models evaluated independent predictors of PC invasion.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 patients were eligible for the study. Of these, 127 (91%) had complete data available for analysis. Median thickness of healthy renal margin was 0.57 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0.24-103). A distinct peritumoral PC was present in 121/127 (95%) tumors with a median thickness of 0.28 mm (IQR 0.14-0.45). In 24/121 (19.8%) cases, RCC showed complete PC invasion. At multivariable analysis, increasing tumor diameter, endophytic rate > 50% and papillary histology were significantly associated with complete PC invasion. Positive surgical margins were reported in 3/127 (2.4%) cases. At a median follow-up of 61 months (range 48-76), one patient died due to metastatic RCC. Among patients alive at follow-up, no cases of recurrence at the enucleation site were recorded, while three cases (2.4%) of renal recurrence (elsewhere in the ipsilateral kidney) and three cases (2.4%) of systemic recurrence were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct RCC-related features were associated with complete PC invasion. By providing a microscopic layer of healthy renal margin in almost all cases, robotic tumor enucleation achieved negative surgical margins in the vast majority of patients, even in case of complete PC invasion. At long-term follow-up, no recurrences were found at the enucleation site. Although our findings need to be confirmed by larger studies with longer follow-up, robotic tumor enucleation appears oncologically safe in experienced hands for the treatment of sporadic RCC.