1
|
Liu F, Wang L, Meagher MF, Afari J, Saitta C, Dhanji S, Ghassemzadeh S, Shah A, Puri D, Nguyen MV, Hakimi K, Schmeusser B, Greenwald R, Medline A, Kamal F, Ali A, Fukuda S, Kobayashi M, Chen W, Fan B, Aida Y, Maezawa Y, Asai S, Tanaka H, Patil D, Fujii Y, Master V, Derweesh IH. Predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in T1a renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the INMARC (International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer) database. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:333.e21-333.e31. [PMID: 38926077 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stage migration in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to an increasing proportion of diagnosed small renal masses. Emerging knowledge regarding heterogeneity of RCC histologies and consequent impact on prognosis led us to further explore outcomes and predictive factors in surgically-treated T1a RCC. METHODS The INMARC database was queried for T1aN0M0 RCC. Patients were stratified into groups based on recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed for factors associated with recurrence, cancer-specific (CSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM). Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMA) assessed survival by histology and grade. Subset analysis for time to recurrence was conducted for grade and histologic groups and compared with recent AUA follow-up guidelines [low-risk (AUA-LR), intermediate-risk (AUA-IR), high-risk (AUA-HR), and very-high risk (AUA-VHR) groups]. RESULTS We analyzed 1,878 patients (median follow-up 35.2 months); 101 (5.4%) developed recurrence. MVA for recurrence demonstrated increasing age (P = 0.026), male sex (P = 0.043), diabetes (P = 0.007), high/unclassified grade (P < 0.001-0.007), and variant histology (P = 0.017) as independent risk factors for increased risk, while papillary (P = 0.016) and chromophobe (P = 0.049) were associated with decreased risk. MVA identified high/unclassified grade (P = 0.003-0.004) and pT3a upstaging (P = 0.043) as predictive factors for worsened risk of CSM while papillary (P = 0.034) was associated with improved risk. MVA for ACM demonstrated increasing age (P < 0.001), non-white (P < 0.001), high-grade (P = 0.022), variant histology (P = 0.049), recurrence (P = 0.004), and eGFR<45 at last follow-up (P < 0.001) to be independent risk factors. KMA comparing clear cell, chromophobe, papillary, and variant RCC revealed significant differences for 5-year CSS (P = 0.018) and RFS (P < 0.001), but not OS (P = 0.34). Median time to recurrence was 23.8 months for low-grade (AUA-LR), 17.3 months for high-grade (AUA-IR), 18 months for pT3a upstaging (AUA-HR), and 12 months for variant histology (AUA-VHR; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION We noted differential outcomes in T1a RCC based on histology and grade for recurrence and CSM, while renal functional decline in addition to pathological factors and recurrence were predictive for ACM. Our findings support recently promulgated AUA follow-up guidelines for low-grade and variant histology pT1a RCC, but call for consolidation of follow-up protocols for high-grade pT1a and pT3a upstaged patients, with intensification of frequency of imaging follow-up in pT1a high-grade RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franklin Liu
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Luke Wang
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Jonathan Afari
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Cesare Saitta
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Sohail Dhanji
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Saeed Ghassemzadeh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Aastha Shah
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Mimi V Nguyen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Benjamin Schmeusser
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Rachel Greenwald
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Alexandra Medline
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Fatima Kamal
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Adil Ali
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Shohei Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Aida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuya Maezawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Asai
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building B Suite 1403 1365-B Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9400 Campus Point Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bertolo R, Veccia A, Montanaro F, Artoni F, Baielli A, Boldini M, Ditonno F, Costantino S, De Marco V, Migliorini F, Porcaro AB, Rizzetto R, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Partial nephrectomy after a period of active surveillance: Are perioperative and pathology outcomes worsened compared to immediate surgery? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108464. [PMID: 38865931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Active surveillance (AS) is a viable strategy for managing small renal masses (SRMs) in lieu of immediate surgery, but concerns persist regarding its impact on delayed partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes. We aimed to compare perioperative and pathological outcomes of patients initially on AS for SRMs, later undergoing PN, against those undergoing immediate PN. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were extracted from a prospective institutional database (January 2018-September 2023) for patients with cT1a renal masses. Only malignancies confirmed at final pathology were included. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics and the time from AS enrollment to PN were recorded. Surgical, renal functional, and final pathology outcomes were analyzed, including histology, tumor size, pT stage, upstaging rate, and positive surgical margins. Predictors of upstaging were identified using logistic regression models. RESULTS Analysis included 356 patients: 307 immediate PN and 49 deferred PN after a median of 18 months in AS. Groups had comparable baseline characteristics; no significant differences emerged in surgical and postoperative outcomes. Final pathology revealed no significant disparities in tumor size, histology, positive margins, or upstaging, though pT stage distribution differed (2.4 % versus 4.3 % for pT3a, immediate versus deferred, p = 0.04). Univariable analysis identified RENAL Score (OR 1.29, 95 % C.I. 1.09-1.53, p = 0.003) and clinical tumor size (OR 1.16, 95 % C.I. 1.10-1.22, p < 0.01) as upstaging predictors, confirmed by multivariable analysis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Our comparative analysis found no worsened perioperative or adverse pathological outcomes in patients with deferred PN, supporting the safety of this approach in managing SRMs, at least as an initial option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li KP, Chen SY, Wan S, Wang CY, Li XR, Yang L. Percutaneous ablation versus robotic‑assisted partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:301. [PMID: 39078530 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02037-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
This investigation sought to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of percutaneous ablation (PCA) versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) among individuals diagnosed with cT1 renal tumors. This study rigorously followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on studies published in English through February 2024. We focused on evaluating primary outcomes, specifically perioperative outcomes, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes. In this analysis, data from 1534 patients across 13 studies were evaluated. PCA was found to have advantageous outcomes in comparison to RAPN regarding hospital stay durations, with a Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) of - 2.03 days (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -3.78 to - 0.27; p = 0.02), operative times (WMD: -106.75 min; 95% CI: - 170.78 to - 42.72; p = 0.001), and overall complication rates (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.89; p = 0.01). Conversely, PCA showed a higher incidence of local recurrence compared to RAPN, with an OR of 3.20 (95% CI: 1.91 to 5.35; p < 0.00001). Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments in terms of major complications, declines in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR), variations in creatinine levels, overall survival rates, and recurrence-free survival. While PCA exhibits higher local recurrence rates than RAPN, it also presents significant advantages, such as shorter hospital stays, decreased operative durations, and lower complication rates. This juxtaposition underscores the urgent need for further, more rigorous research to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun-Peng Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China
| | - Si-Yu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shun Wan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chen-Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Ran Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Urinary System Disease, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park JS, Kim H, Jang WS, Kim J, Ham WS, Lee ST. ctDNA predicts clinical T1a to pathological T3a upstaging after partial nephrectomy. Cancer Sci 2024; 115:1680-1687. [PMID: 38475661 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Most patients diagnosed with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are also detected with small and organ-confined tumors, and the majority of these are classified as clinical tumor stage 1a (cT1a). A considerable proportion of patients with cT1 RCC shows tumor upstaging to pathological stage 3a (pT3a), and these patients have worse oncological outcomes. The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in RCC has been limited to monitoring treatment response and resistance. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the potential of ctDNA in predicting pT3a upstaging in cT1a ccRCC. We sequenced plasma samples preoperatively collected from 48 patients who had undergone partial nephrectomy for cT1a ccRCC using data from a prospective cohort RCC. The ctDNA were profiled and compared with clinicopathological ccRCC features to predict pT3a upstaging. Associations between ctDNA, tumor complexity, and pT3a upstaging were evaluated. Tumor complexity was assessed using the anatomical classification system. Univariate analysis used chi-squared and Student's t-tests; multivariate analysis considered significant factors from univariate analyses. Of the 48 patients with cT1a ccRCC, 12 (25%) were upstaged to pT3a, with ctDNA detected in 10 (20.8%), predominantly in patients with renal sinus fat invasion (SFI; n = 8). Among the pT3a group, ctDNA was detected in 75%, contrasting with only 2.8% in patients with pT1a (1/36). Detection of ctDNA was the only significant preoperative predictor of pT3a upstaging, especially in SFI. This study is the first to suggest ctDNA as a preoperative predictor of pT3a RCC upstaging from cT1a based on preoperative radiological images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Soo Park
- Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hongkyung Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sik Jang
- Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongchan Kim
- Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sik Ham
- Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dxome Co. Ltd, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xing Z, Li Y. ASO Author Reflections: Clinical Stage I Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients with Gross Hematuria: Radical Nephrectomy or Partial Nephrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3556-3557. [PMID: 38319514 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14988-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Xing
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xing Z, Xu H, Ai K, Deng H, Hong Y, Deng P, Wang J, Xiong W, Li Z, Zhu L, Li Y. Gross Hematuria Does not Affect the Selection of Nephrectomy Types for Clinical Stage 1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3531-3543. [PMID: 38329657 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14958-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to discuss the correlation between gross hematuria and postoperative upstaging (from T1 to T3a) in patients with cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and to compare oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with gross hematuria. METHODS A total of 2145 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in the study (including 363 patients with gross hematuria). The least absolute selection and shrinkage operator logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk factor of postoperative pathological upstaging. The propensity score matching (PSM) and stable inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were used to balance the confounding factors. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model were used to assess the prognosis. RESULTS Gross hematuria was a risk factor of postoperative pathological upstaging (odds ratio [OR] = 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.44-6.42; P < 0.001). After PSM and stable IPTW adjustment, the characteristics were similar in corresponding patients in the PN and RN groups. In the PSM cohort, PN did not have a statistically significant impact on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48; 95% CI 0.25-8.88; P = 0.67), metastasis-free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.33-4.66; P = 0.75), and overall survival (HR = 1.46; 95% CI 0.31-6.73; P = 0.63) compared with RN. The results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Although gross hematuria was associated with postoperative pathological upstaging in patients with cT1 ccRCC, PN should still be the preferred treatment for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Xing
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Haozhe Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Kai Ai
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Haitao Deng
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yulong Hong
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Piye Deng
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wei Xiong
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhi Li
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated First Hospital of Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China
| | - Lingfei Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pathak N, Ganpule A, Patel D, Singh A, Shete N, Sabnis R, Desai M. Outcomes and predictors of clinical T1 renal mass (cT1) upstaged to pathological T3a (pT3a) after partial nephrectomy: A single-center experience. Int J Urol 2024; 31:252-257. [PMID: 38124339 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical T1 (cT1) renal mass treated surgically has a good prognosis, but there is an upstaging risk that potentially threatens oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). We aim to analyze and study the incidence, predictors, perioperative morbidity, and oncological outcomes of pT3a upstaging. METHODOLOGY A retrospective study of 313 patients who underwent PN for cT1 renal mass at a single center from a single tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2021 was done. Demographic, perioperative, pathological, and outcome variables were reviewed. We compared these parameters between upstaged and non-upstaged groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study preoperative variables associated with upstaging. RESULTS Nineteen patients were upstaged to pT3a. Making an incidence of 6.1%. Upstaged tumors were bigger (5.02 cm vs. 4.08 cm, p = 0.004), had higher clinical stage T1b (84.2 vs. 40.5%, p < 0.001), had more tumors which were central location (21 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), had more endophytic and mesophytic tumors (15.8 vs. 5.8% and 52.6 vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001), and had higher R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry score (8.05 vs. 6, p < 0.001). Upstaged tumors had more operative times (227 vs. 203 min, p = 0.01), more postoperative complications (68.4 vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), more major complications of Clavien Dindo Grade 3 and above (15.8 vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). Age (OR 1.035, p = 0.034), Radiological tumor dimension (OR 1.578, p = 0.003), Radiological or Clinical stage (T1b) (9.19, p = 0.008), Higher Nephrometry score (Intermediate and High) (OR 6.184, p = 0.004) were preoperative predictors of upstaging. Oncological outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSION Tumor upstaging was uncommon with more perioperative morbidity. Higher age, larger tumor size, higher tumor stage, and higher nephrometry scores were preoperative predictors of upstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niramya Pathak
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Arvind Ganpule
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Dhruv Patel
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Abhishek Singh
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Nitiraj Shete
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Ravindra Sabnis
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu Z, Wu Y, Zhao G, Jin B, Jiang P. A novel DNA methylation signature revealed GDF6 and RCC1 as potential prognostic biomarkers correlated with cell proliferation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 51:16. [PMID: 38087057 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-09003-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for the majority (80%-90%) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients at the time of diagnosis, and approximately 15% of ccRCC patients will develop distant metastasis or recurrence during their lifetime. Increasing number of studies have revealed that the aberrant DNA methylations is closely correlated with the tumorigenesis in ccRCC. RESULTS In this study, we utilized a LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) model to identify a combination of 13 probes-based DNA methylation signature that associated with the progression-free survival (PFS) of ccRCC patients. First, differentially methylated regions (CpGs) related to PFS and phenotypes were identified. Next, prognostic DNA methylation probes were selected from the differentially methylated probes (DMPs) and calculated risk scores to stratify patients with ccRCC. The performance of this signature was validated in an independent testing set using various analyses, including Kaplan-Meier analysis for PFS and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Based on our 13-DNA methylation probes signature, ccRCC patients were successfully stratified into high- and low-risk groups. Combining DNA methylation signature with clinical variables such as T stage, M stage and tumor grade could further improve the accuracy of prediction. Moreover, we highlight two molecular biomarkers (RCC1 and GDF6) corresponding to our probes. Invitro experiments showed that knockdown of RCC1 or GDF6 in ccRCC cell lines reduced cell proliferation, which indicated that both biomarkers are associated with tumorigenesis. CONCLUSIONS The 13-probes-based DNA methylation signature has the potential to serve as an independent tool for survival outcome improvement and treatment strategy selection for ccRCC patients. In addition, our findings suggest that RCC1 and GDF6 may serve as promising markers for ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhijie Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Bladder Tumor Innovation Diagnosis and Treatment, Hangzhou, 31003, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yunfei Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Bladder Tumor Innovation Diagnosis and Treatment, Hangzhou, 31003, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guanan Zhao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Urology, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui, 323050, Zhejiang, China
| | - Baiye Jin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Bladder Tumor Innovation Diagnosis and Treatment, Hangzhou, 31003, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peng Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China.
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Bladder Tumor Innovation Diagnosis and Treatment, Hangzhou, 31003, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Han JH, Jeong SH, Kim SH, Kim GH, Yuk HD, Ku JH, Kim HH, Kwak C, Jeong CW. Tubular damage marker as a predictive factor for pathologically upstaged renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:3551-3557. [PMID: 37831155 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04646-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate if increased tubular damage biomarker can predict pathologically upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which may possess sub-radiologic invasive behavior, leading to surrounding tubular damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined 1563 patients with surgically resected RCC between March 2016 and June 2021 from the prospective database SUPER-RCC-Nx. Exclusion criteria were cancer not originating from the kidneys, benign renal tumor, and end-stage renal disease. RESULTS Of 1297 patients, 131 had a clinically high T stage (T3-4), whereas 1166 had a low one. Patients with a clinically low T stage were subgrouped into identical-stage (n = 1041) and upstaged (n = 125) groups, who were confirmed as a pathologically high T stage. The upstaged group had older age (p = 0.003), larger tumor size (5.72 ± 3.24 vs. 3.12 ± 2.08, p < 0.001), higher Fuhrman grade (grades 3-4) (57.3% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.032), and higher urine N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase/creatinine (NAG/Cr) (5.13 ± 4.78 vs. 4.05 ± 2.84, p = 0.026). Tumor size (> 4 cm; odds ratio = 10.2, p < 0.001) and urine NAG/Cr (odds ratio = 1.16, p = 0.003) were independently associated with pathological upstaging in patients with normal renal function, while age and tumor size were significant risk factors in those with decreased renal function. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the model using tumor size and urine NAG/Cr strongly predicted pathological upstaging (area under the curve, 0.84). CONCLUSION Urine NAG/Cr may be a useful biomarker predicting pathologically upstaged RCC. Clinicians should be prudent in making management decisions when a large RCC is accompanied by an increased urine NAG/Cr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jang Hee Han
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung-Hwan Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Si Hyun Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, South Korea
| | - Gyeong Hun Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Hyeong Dong Yuk
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wenzel M, Hoeh B, Cano Garcia C, Bernatz S, Köllermann J, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Becker A, Mandel P. Patient and tumor characteristics of histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma and its risk of upstaging to ≥pT3. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:487.e7-487.e13. [PMID: 37758628 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how histological subtypes impact upstaging to nonorgan confined renal cell carcinoma (≥pT3 RCC) in patients treated with partial/radical nephrectomy for cT1-2 RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify RCC patients treated with partial/radical nephrectomy between January 2002 and December 2021. Patients were stratified according to histological subtype of RCC. Upstaging was defined as any cT1-2 tumor classified as ≥pT3 at final pathology. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to predict upstaging. RESULTS Of overall 1,020 surgically treated RCC patients, 743 harbored clear-cell (72.8%) vs. 193 (18.9%) papillary vs. 49 (4.8%) chromophobe vs. each 4 (0.4%) collecting duct and sarcomatoid vs. 27 (2.6%) other/mixed pathology of RCC. Median tumor size ranged from 3.0 cm (mixed RCC) to 7.7 cm (sarcomatoid RCC). In total, upstaging rate to ≥pT3 was 22% and ranged from 6.1% (chromophobe RCC) to 75% (collecting duct RCC). In univariable logistic regression models, chromophobe and papillary histological subtypes were significantly associated with lower upstaging of all cT1-2 RCC tumors. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics in multivariable logistic regression models, papillary RCC independently lowers the risk of upstaging, even in sensitivity analyses for cT1 RCC only. CONCLUSION Important differences between histological subtypes of RCC exist regarding characteristics such as stage and tumor size at presentation, as well as upstaging to ≥pT3 at final pathology. Specifically, papillary RCC is significantly associated with lower chance of upstaging even after controlling for confounding parameters. The study is limited by missing central pathological/radiographic review and lack of survival analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Simon Bernatz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Z, Yang Z, Li J, Liu Z, Ma N, Chen P, Bi X, Li Z, Dong P, Han H, He X, Mao X, Guo S. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for the treatment of pT3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score analysis. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:3607-3613. [PMID: 37147255 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival benefit of partial nephrectomy (PN) in pT3a RCC patients is controversial. Here we aimed to explore the potential benefit of PN for pT3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model between PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) in pT3aN0M0 RCC. Propensity score (-adjusted, -stratified, -weighted, and -matched) analyses were performed to control for imbalances in individual risk factors. RESULTS A total of 1277 patients with pT3aN0M0 RCC were identified, of whom 200 patients were treated with PN and 1077 patients were RN. PN showed favorable OS and CSS in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC (P < 0.05), and similar OS and CSS in 4-7 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC, compared with RN using un-adjusted analyses. The Propensity score analyses further demonstrated the survival benefit of PN compared with the RN in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, PN was associated with improved survival compared with RN in 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC. Moreover, survival was comparable between PN and RN in 4-7 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC. These data provided evidence that PN could be an alternative choice for T3aN0M0 RCC less than 7 cm. Particularly, patients with 0-4 cm pT3aN0M0 RCC might benefit from PN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zefu Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Ma
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümchi, China
| | - Xing Bi
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümchi, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaobo He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaopeng Mao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khaleel S, Truong H, Jiang S, K-Lee P, Davelman B, Gordon D, Benfante N, Arora A, Ostrovnaya I, Tickoo S, Coleman J, Hakimi AA, Russo P. Adverse pathologic features impact survival outcomes for small renal masses following nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:391.e5-391.e11. [PMID: 37423816 PMCID: PMC11042782 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While most small renal masses (SRM) < 4 cm have an excellent prognosis following resection, the impact of adverse T3a pathologic features on oncologic outcomes of SRMs remains unclear. We sought to compare clinical outcomes for surgically resected pT3a versus pT1a SRMs at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy (RN, PN) for renal tumors <4 cm at our institution between 2010 and 2020. We compared features and outcomes of pT3a vs pT1a SRMs. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Student's t and Pearson's chi-squared tests, respectively. Postoperative outcomes of interest including overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival (OS, CSS, and RFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard regression, and competing risk analysis. Analyses were performed using R statistical package (R Foundation, v4.0). RESULTS We identified 1,837 patients with malignant SRMs. Predictors of postoperative pT3a upstaging included higher renal score, larger tumor size, and presence of radiologic features concerning for T3a disease (odds ratio [OR] = 5.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.92-7.59, P < 0.001). On univariable modeling, pT3a SRMs had higher positive margin rates (9.6% vs 4.1%, P < 0.001), worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.3, P = 0.002), RFS (HR 9.32, 95% CI 2-40.1, P = 0.003), and CSS (HR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.5-8.2, P = 0.003). On multivariable modeling, pT3a status remained associated with worse RFS (HR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.04-7, P = 0.04), but not OS (HR 1.6, 95% CI = 0.83-3.1, P = 0.2); multivariable modeling was deferred for CSS due to low event rates. CONCLUSIONS Adverse T3a pathologic features portend worse outcomes for SRMs, highlighting the crucial role of pre-operative planning and case selection. These patients have relatively poor prognosis, and should be monitored more closely and counseled for consideration of adjuvant therapy or clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sari Khaleel
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hong Truong
- Department of Urology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Song Jiang
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul K-Lee
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin Davelman
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Danielle Gordon
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Irina Ostrovnaya
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Satish Tickoo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Soegaard Ballester JM, Finn CB, Ginzberg SP, Kelz RR, Wachtel H. Thyroid cancer pathologic upstaging: Frequency and related factors. Am J Surg 2023; 226:171-175. [PMID: 37019808 PMCID: PMC10518023 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Histopathologic assessment of thyroid tumors can lead to stage migration. We assessed frequency of pathologic upstaging, and associations with patient and tumor factors. METHODS Primary thyroid cancers treated between 2013 and 2015 were included from our institutional cancer registry. For tumor, nodal, and summary stage, upstaging was present when final pathologic stage was greater than clinical staging. Multivariate logistic regression and Chi-squared tests were performed. RESULTS 5,351 resected thyroid tumors were identified. Upstaging rates for tumor, nodal, and summary stage were 17.5% (n = 553/3156), 18.0% (n = 488/2705), and 10.9% (n = 285/2607), respectively. Age, Asian race, days to surgery, lymphovascular invasion, and follicular histology were significantly associated. Upstaging was significantly more common after total vs partial thyroidectomy, for tumor (19.4% vs 6.2%, p < 0.001), nodal (19.3% vs 6.4%, p < 0.001), and summary stages (12.3% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pathologic upstaging occurs in a considerable proportion of thyroid tumors, most commonly after total thyroidectomy. These findings can inform patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caitlin B Finn
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Sara P Ginzberg
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Heather Wachtel
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khene ZE, Kutikov A, Campi R. Machine learning in renal cell carcinoma research: the promise and pitfalls of 'renal-izing' the potential of artificial intelligence. BJU Int 2023; 132:231-232. [PMID: 37005367 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
- Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI), University of Rennes INSERM, Rennes, France
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Minimally Invasive, Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kalfazade N, Özlü DN, Şam E, Akkaş F, Gürbüz N. Factors associated with pathological tumor stage and T3a upstage in clinical T1-2 renal cell carcinoma. Prog Urol 2023; 33:135-144. [PMID: 36604246 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Considering the oncological outcomes, understanding the preoperative factors associated with and predicting advanced stage and T3a upstage will help in risk assessment and selection of the right treatment. MATERIAL AND METHOD Patients with postoperative pathology of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) and stage T1-2 N0M0 were included in the study. Demographic and pathological characteristics of the patients, Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and De Ritis- the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were recorded. Patients were classified according to T stage (T1-2 vs T3-4) and T3a upstage (T3a upstaged vs non-T3a upstaged). RESULTS A total of 289 patients participated in the study when inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. No difference was found between the groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index, laterality, ABO blood group, Rh positivity and comorbidities. According to multivariate analysis, PLR, AST/ALT, Fuhrman grade, open radical nephrectomy (RN) and Clear Cell pathological subtype were found to be significant-independent factors in predicting advanced stage (T3-4) and T3a upstage (P<0.05). CONCLUSION It was found that higher PLR and AST/ALT ratios were associated with more advanced stage and postoperative T3a upstage in RCC patients. In addition, these patients more frequently had open RN and had higher Fuhrman grades, while the clear cell subtype was less common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Kalfazade
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - D N Özlü
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - E Şam
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
| | - F Akkaş
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
| | - N Gürbüz
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cerrato C, Patel D, Autorino R, Simone G, Yang B, Uzzo R, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Porter J, Beksac AT, Minervini A, Antonelli A, Cerruto MA, Lau C, Ashrafi A, Eun D, Mottrie A, Mir C, Meagher MF, Puri D, Nguyen M, Dhanji S, Liu F, Pandolfo SD, Kutikov A, Montorsi F, Gill IS, Sundaram C, Kaouk J, Derweesh IH. Partial or radical nephrectomy for complex renal mass: a comparative analysis of oncological outcomes and complications from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group. World J Urol 2023; 41:747-755. [PMID: 36856832 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04279-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) for complex renal masses (CRM). METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of CRM patients who underwent MIS-RN and RAPN. CRM was defined as RENAL score 10-12. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence, and complications. Multivariable analysis (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) were used to analyze functional and survival outcomes for RN vs. PN by pathological stage. RESULTS 926 patients were analyzed (MIS-RN = 437/RAPN = 489; median follow-up 24.0 months). MVA demonstrated lack of transfusion (HR = 1.63, p = 0.005), low-grade (HR = 1.18, p = 0.018) and smaller tumor size (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with OS. Younger age (HR = 1.01, p = 0.017), high-grade (HR = 1.18, p = 0.017), smaller tumor size (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001), and lack of transfusion (HR = 1.39, p = 0.038) were associated with CSS. Increasing tumor size (HR = 1.18, p < 0.001), high-grade (HR = 3.21, p < 0.001), and increasing age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.009) were independent risk factors for recurrence. Type of surgery was not associated with major complications (p = 0.094). For KMA of MIS-RN vs. RAPN for pT1, pT2 and pT3, 5-year OS was 85% vs. 88% (p = 0.078); 82% vs. 80% (p = 0.442) and 84% vs. 83% (p = 0.863), respectively. 5-year CSS was 98% for both procedures (p = 0.473); 94% vs. 92% (p = 0.735) and 91% vs. 90% (p = 0.581). 5-year non-CSS was 87% vs. 93% (p = 0.107); 87% for pT2 (p = 0.485) and 92% for pT3 for both procedures (p = 0.403). CONCLUSION RAPN in CRM is not associated with increased risk of complications or worsened oncological outcomes when compared to MIS-RN and may be preferred when clinically indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Devin Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, VCU Health System, Richmond, USA.,Department of Urology, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS-"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert Uzzo
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, University of Turin-San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute (URI) Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alp Tuna Beksac
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Clayton Lau
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Akbar Ashrafi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, IMED Hospitals, Valencia, Spain
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Mimi Nguyen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Sohail Dhanji
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | - Franklin Liu
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA
| | | | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute (URI) Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, University, Milan, Italy
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Chandru Sundaram
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, Mail Code 0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0987, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Almdalal T, Karlsson Rosenblad A, Hellström M, Kjellman A, Lindblad P, Lundstam S, Sundqvist P, Ljungberg B. Predictive characteristics for disease recurrence and overall survival in non-metastatic clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma - results from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register. Scand J Urol 2023; 57:67-74. [PMID: 36520023 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2154383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (cT1RCC) have risks for recurrence and reduced overall survival despite being in the best prognostic group. This study aimed to evaluate the association of different treatments on disease recurrence and overall survival using clinical and pathological characteristics in a nation-wide cT1RCC cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 4,965 patients, registered in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register (NSKCR) between 2005 and 2014, with ≥ 5-years follow-up were identified: 3,040 males and 1,925 females, mean age 65 years. Times to recurrence and overall survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression models. RESULTS Age, TNM-stage, tumor size, RCC-type, and performed treatment were all associated with disease recurrence. Patients selected for ablative treatments had increased risk for recurrent disease: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.69-5.32]. In multivariate analyses, age, gender, tumor size, RCC-type, N-stage, recurrence and performed treatment were all independently associated with overall survival. Patients with chRCC had a 41% better overall survival (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.78; p < 0.001) than ccRCC. Patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) had an 18% better overall survival (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.95, p < 0.001) than patients treated with radical nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS Age, gender, T-stage, tumor size, RCC type and treatment modality are all associated with risk of recurrence. Furthermore, age, male gender, tumor size, N-stage and recurrence are associated with reduced overall survival. Patients with chRCC, compared with ccRCC and pRCC patients, and PN compared with RN treated patients, had an advantageous overall survival, indicating a possible survival advantage of nephron sparing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Almdalal
- Department of Surgery and Urology, Eskilstuna Country Hospital, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Andreas Karlsson Rosenblad
- Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm-Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Clinical Diabetology and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Mikael Hellström
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska Academy/Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Kjellman
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Lindblad
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Sven Lundstam
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Sundqvist
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Börje Ljungberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Di Maida F, Campi R, Grosso AA, Lambertini L, Cadenar A, Giudici S, Pecoraro A, Mari A, Serni S, Minervini A, Belmonte M, Catucci C, Mariottini R, Marzocco A, Moscardi L, Livio V, Mazzola L. Prognostic features of upstaged pT3a renal tumors with fat invasion after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it time for a new subclassification? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 49:862-867. [PMID: 36528511 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinical management of pT3a pathologic-upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients is actually controversial. Aim of this study was i) to assess the impact of pT3a upstaging on oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cT1-T2 RCC; ii) to explore clinical and surgical predictors of pT3a upstaging; iii) to evaluate the differential impact of perinephric fat invasion (PFI) or sinus fat invasion (SFI) on survival outcomes after RAPN in case of upstaged pT3a RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical and surgical data from consecutive RCCs treated with RAPN in a single referral centre between January 2017 and June 2021 were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Pathological upstaging to pT3a tumors with fat invasion was further stratified in SFI or PFI. Uni- and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of disease recurrence. RESULTS Overall, 1852 patients were enrolled and 179 (9.7%) with pT3a upstaging were found. Median age was 65 (IQR 56-73) years with a median BMI of 25.6 (23.6-29.0). At a median follow up of 26 (9-38) months, 76 (4.1%) patients showed disease recurrence. Multivariable analysis confirmed PADUA score ≥10 (OR 1.76, CI 95% 1.18-1.91, p = 0.001), age at surgery (OR 1.04, CI 95% 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01), clinical tumor diameter (OR 1.31, CI 95% 1.17-1.47, p = 0.001), tumor necrosis (OR 1.54, CI 95% 1.08-1.88, p = 0.001) and nucleolar grading ≥3 (OR 1.27, CI 95% 1.01-1.44, p = 0.001) as independent predictors of pT3a upstaging. Multivariate Cox regression model showed pathological sinus fat invasion as an independent predictor of disease recurrence (HR 3.43, CI 95% 1.51-7.77, p = 0.003) in pT3a upstaged group. CONCLUSION In pathologically upstaged pT3a RCCs, sinus fat invasion was confirmed as independent predictor of disease relapse. In this light, the definition of novel risk categories in the pT3a patients setting should be encouraged.
Collapse
|
19
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1195-1274. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Cao C, Kang X, Shang B, Shou J, Shi H, Jiang W, Xie R, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zheng S, Bi X, Li C, Ma J. A novel nomogram can predict pathological T3a upstaged from clinical T1a in localized renal cell carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48:784-794. [PMID: 35838503 PMCID: PMC9388175 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Nomogram can be built to predict the pathological T3a upstaging from clinical T1a in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma before surgery. PURPOSE Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with clinical T1a (cT1a) disease who are upstaged to pathological T3a (pT3a) have reduced survivals after partial nephrectomy. We aimed to develop a nomogram-based model predicting pT3a upstaging in RCC patients with preoperative cT1a based on multiple preoperative blood indexes and oncological characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2010 and 2019, 510 patients with cT1a RCC were individually matched according to pT3a upstaging and pathological T1a (pT1a) at a 1:4 ratio using clinicopathologic features. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was used to identify the most important risk factor from 40 peripheral blood indicators, and a predictive model was established. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with the screened blood parameters and clinical data to identify significant variables. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was applied to evaluate the accuracy of the model for predicting pT3a upstaging in patients with cT1a RCC. RESULTS Out of 40 blood indexes, the top ranked predictor was fibrinogen (FIB). Age, the ratio of the tumor maximum and minimum diameter (ROD), FIB, and tumor size were all independent risk factors for pT3a upstaging in multivariate analysis. A predictive ARFS model (Age, ROD, FIB, tumor Size) was established, and the C-index was 0.756 (95% CI, 0.681-0.831) and 0.712 (95% CI, 0.638-0.785) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Older age, higher ROD, increased FIB level, and larger tumor size were independent risk factors for upstaging. The ARFS model has a high prediction efficiency for pT3a upstaging in patients with cT1a RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanzhen Cao
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Xiangpeng Kang
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Bingqing Shang
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Jianzhong Shou
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Hongzhe Shi
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Weixing Jiang
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Ruiyang Xie
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Jin Zhang
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Imaging, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing China;
| | - Lianyu Zhang
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Imaging, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing China;
| | - Shan Zheng
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing China
| | - Xingang Bi
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Changling Li
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| | - Jianhui Ma
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeCancer HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerBeijingChinaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dos Reis RB, Feres RN, da Silva MC, Muglia VF, Rodrigues AA. The dilemma of partial nephrectomy and surgical upstaging. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48:795-797. [PMID: 35838504 PMCID: PMC9388171 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0859.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis
- Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Pretom, SP, Brasil
| | - Rafael Neuppmann Feres
- Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Pretom, SP, Brasil
| | - Marcelo Cartapatti da Silva
- Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Pretom, SP, Brasil
| | - Valdair Francisco Muglia
- Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Radioterapia e Oncohematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
| | - Antonio Antunes Rodrigues
- Departamento de Cirurgia e Anatomia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Pretom, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Almdalal T, Sundqvist P, Harmenberg U, Hellström M, Lindskog M, Lindblad P, Lundstam S, Ljungberg B. Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma, Not Always a Harmless Disease—A National Register Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:22-28. [PMID: 35528783 PMCID: PMC9068725 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is typically considered a curable disease, irrespective of the choice of local treatment modality. Objective To identify factors associated with the risk of local and distant recurrence, and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary nonmetastatic clinical T1a RCC. Design, setting, and participants A population-based nationwide register study of all 1935 patients with cT1a RCC, diagnosed during 2005–2012, identified through The National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register, was conducted. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Outcome variables were recurrence (local or distant) and OS. Possible explanatory variables included tumor size, RCC type, T stage, surgical technique, age, and gender. Associations with disease recurrence and OS were evaluated by multivariable regression and Cox multivariate analyses, respectively. Results and limitations Among 1935 patients, 938 were treated with radical nephrectomy, 738 with partial nephrectomy, and 169 with ablative treatments, while 90 patients had no surgery. Seventy-eight (4%) patients were upstaged to pT3. Local or metastatic recurrences occurred in 145 (7.5%) patients, significantly more often after ablation (17.8%). The risk of recurrence was associated with tumor size, upstaging, and ablation. Larger tumor size, disease recurrence, and older age adversely affected OS, whereas partial nephrectomy and chromophobe RCC (chRCC) were associated with improved survival. Limitations include register design and a lack of comorbidity or performance status data. Conclusions Upstaging and recurrence occurred, respectively, in 4.0% and 7.5% of patients with nonmetastatic RCCs ≤4 cm. Tumor size upstaging and ablation were associated with the risk for recurrence, while tumor size and recurrence were associated with decreased OS. Patients with chRCC and partial nephrectomy had prolonged OS in a real-world setting. Patient summary We studied factors that may influence the risk of disease recurrence and overall survival, in a large nationwide patient cohort having nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma ≤4 cm. Tumor size, tumor type, and treatment were associated with the risk of recurrence and overall death. Partial nephrectomy prolonged overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Almdalal
- Department of Surgery and Urology, Eskilstuna Country Hospital, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Sundqvist
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Harmenberg
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Hellström
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska Academy/Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindskog
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Lindblad
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Svan Lundstam
- Department of Urology and Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Börje Ljungberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Corresponding author. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå 901 85, Sweden. Tel. +46703227690; Fax: +4690125396.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Richard PO, Violette PD, Bhindi B, Breau RH, Kassouf W, Lavallée LT, Jewett M, Kachura JR, Kapoor A, Noel-Lamy M, Ordon M, Pautler SE, Pouliot F, So AI, Rendon RA, Tanguay S, Collins C, Kandi M, Shayegan B, Weller A, Finelli A, Kokorovic A, Nayak J. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:E61-E75. [PMID: 35133268 PMCID: PMC8932428 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O. Richard
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe D. Violette
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luke T. Lavallée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R. Kachura
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maxime Noel-Lamy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Ordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen E. Pautler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Alan I. So
- Division of Urology, British Columbia Cancer Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ricardo A. Rendon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Capital Health - QEII, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Maryam Kandi
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Kokorovic
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Nayak
- Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu S, Feng C, Liu C, Wang Z. Comparison of prognosis between patients undergoing radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0: Survival benefit is biased toward partial nephrectomy. Cancer Med 2021; 10:8909-8923. [PMID: 34779154 PMCID: PMC8683550 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited and controversial evidence on the prognosis of partial nephrectomy (PN) versus radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with T3aN0/xM0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) upstaged from clinical T1 RCC. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognosis difference following PN versus RN in patients with ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0 RCC. METHODS From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of 3196 patients receiving treatment of PN/RN for ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0 RCC with only extrarenal fat extension in 2010-2017 were identified. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted cause-specific Cox model with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) analyses. Sensitivity analysis was based on the propensity score matching of PN and RN groups and from the dataset of 2010-2013. RESULTS A total of 872 patients underwent PN, compared with 2324 undergoing RN. After IPTW adjustment, there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline characteristics between the PN and RN cohorts. Patients who underwent RN had worse OS (HRIPTW-adjusted , 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.84; p = 0.001) and comparable CSS (HRIPTW-adjusted , 1.03; 95% CI, 0.64-1.66; p = 0.890) than those receiving PN in all cohorts and subgroups with T3a RCC of ≤4 cm and perinephric fat extension. Further, in patients with 4-7 cm T3a RCC with perinephric-fat invasion and all sizes of T3a RCC with sinus/perisinus fat extension, PN led to comparable OS and CSS. Sensitivity analyses validated these results. CONCLUSION PN provides comparable CSS and OS or even better OS than RN for patients with RCC ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0. Although our study has some limitations, our results indicated that PN might oncologically safe for clinical T1 RCC, even confirmed a pathologically T3a upstaging post-PN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiliang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chunxiang Feng
- Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhixian Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu H, Wang Z, Peng E, Chen Z, Tang K, Xia D. Added Value of Systemic Inflammation Markers in Predicting Clinical Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Pathologically Upstaged to T3a. Front Oncol 2021; 11:679536. [PMID: 34136403 PMCID: PMC8202414 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to determine preoperative risk factors associated with pathologic T3a (pT3a) upstaging of clinical T1 (cT1) renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and develop a novel model capable of accurately identifying those patients at high risk of harboring occult pT3a characteristics. Methods A retrospective analysis of 1324 cT1 RCC patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) was performed. The study cohort was divided into training and testing datasets in a 70:30 ratio for further analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors associated with cT1 to pT3a upstaging and subsequently, those significant risk factors were used to construct models. We used the area under the curve (AUC) to determine the model with the highest discrimination power. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) were applied to evaluate clinical net benefit associated with using the predictive models. Results The rates of upstaging were 6.1% (n = 81), 5.8% (n = 54) and 6.8% (n = 27) in the total population, training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Tumor size, clinical T stage, R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior) nephrometry score, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) were significantly associated with pT3a upstaging. The model that consisted of R.E.N.A.L. score, LMR, AGR and PNI achieved the highest AUC of 0.70 in the validation cohort and yielded the highest net benefit. In the subpopulation with complete serum lipid profile, the inclusion of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Castelli risk index-I (CRI-I) significantly improved the discrimination of model (AUC = 0.86). Conclusions Our finding highlights the importance of systemic inflammation response markers and serum lipid parameters in predicting pT3a upstaging. Our model had relatively good discrimination in predicting occult pT3a disease among patients with cT1 renal lesions, and the use of the model may be greatly beneficial to urologists in risk stratification and management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhixian Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ejun Peng
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kun Tang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ding Xia
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Amparore D, Pecoraro A, Piramide F, Checcucci E, DE Cillis S, Volpi G, Piana A, Verri P, Granato S, Sica M, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Comparison between minimally-invasive partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of clinical T2 renal masses: results of a 10-year study in a tertiary care center. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:509-517. [PMID: 33887896 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04390-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even if partial nephrectomy (PN) is nowadays considered the standard for managing cT1 renal masses, its role in the management of cT2 kidney tumors is controversial. We aimed to compare oncologic and functional outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (RN) and PN in cT2 renal masses. METHODS Patients with cT2 renal masses underwent minimally-invasive PN or RN performed by a highly experienced single surgeon from 2009 to 2019 were considered. Demographic, perioperative and functional variables were compared. Cumulative incidence plot and competing risks regression (CRR) models were used to test differences in 5-year cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and 5-year other-cause mortality (OCM) rates. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model was used to test differences in 5-year progression free survival (PFS) rates. RESULTS Overall, 52 PN vs. 64 RN patients were identified. Relative to RN, PN patients recorded higher rates of complications (25% vs. 7.8%, P=0.02) but lower upstaging rate (≥pT3a 64.1% vs. 19.2%, P<0.0001). Functional outcomes were in favor of PN (all P<0.001). No differences were recorded between 5-year CSM and OCM according to nephrectomy type. At CRR models, older age and upstaging were independent predictors of 5-year OCM and CSM, respectively (all P<0.01). Finally, only upstaging, high grade tumors and presence of positive surgical margins were identified as independent predictors of 5-year PFS (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In experienced hands the treatment of cT2 renal neoplasms with minimally-invasive PN is feasible, providing perioperative and oncological safety profiles comparable to RN, with advantages in terms of functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy - .,Renal Cancer Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands -
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.,Renal Cancer Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.,Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li L, Shi L, Zhang J, Fan Y, Li Q. The critical impact of tumor size in predicting cancer special survival for T3aM0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A proposal of an alternative T3aN0M0 stage. Cancer Med 2020; 10:605-614. [PMID: 33280246 PMCID: PMC7877365 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Based on the eighth TNM staging system, T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is identified as an anatomical extrarenal invasion and does not consider the size of the tumor; however, it may not fully predict the prognosis of the patient. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor size effects on prognosis in T3a RCC and propose an alternative tumor stage system combined with T1-2. METHODS Data relating to T1-3aN0M0 RCC (n = 49586) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Survival analyses were conducted by Cox regression and Fine and Gray regression. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) was used to assess the discriminatory ability of the prognostic factors. RESULTS A 1-cm increase in T3a RCC resulted in an 8% increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.10, p < 0.001) and 14% increase in the risk of RCC-specific mortality (sub-distribution HR [sHR]: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.16, p < 0.001). T3a tumor size stratified by the cutoff of 4 cm and 7 cm showed a better prediction of RCC-special survival (c-index: 0.644), compared with a cutoff just by 4 cm (c-index: 0.571) or by 7 cm (c-index: 0.602). Compared with T1b tumors, T3a RCC ≤4 cm showed no differences in terms of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79-1.09; p = 0.37) and mortality caused by RCC (sHR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.70-1.19; p = 0.50). Last, the alternative T-staging system (T1a, a combination of T1b and T3a [≤4 cm], T2a, T2b, T3a [4-7 cm], and T3a [>7] cm) demonstrated good RCC-special survival predictive accuracy (c-index: 0.729), which was higher than that shown by the current eighth edition T-staging system (c-index: 0.720). CONCLUSION Tumor size should be taken into consideration for T3aN0M0 RCC rather than based on anatomical features alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luping Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junjie Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yingzhong Fan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yim K, Aron M, Rha KH, Simone G, Minervini A, Challacombe B, Schips L, Berardinelli F, Quarto G, Mehrazin R, Patel D, Patel S, Bindayi A, Ashrafi AN, Desai M, Alqahtani A, Gallucci M, Sulek J, Mari A, De Luyk N, Anele U, Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Sundaram CP, Gill IS, Perdona S, Derweesh IH. Outcomes of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T3a Renal Masses: A Multicenter Analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:1107-1114. [PMID: 33249089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of partial nephrectomy (PN) in T3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. OBJECTIVE To evaluate quality outcomes of robot-assisted PN (RAPN) for clinical T3a renal masses (cT3aRM). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective multicenter analysis of patients with cT3aN0M0 RCC who underwent RAPN. INTERVENTION RAPN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was a trifecta composite outcome of negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤25 min, and no perioperative complications. The optimal outcome was defined as achieving this trifecta and ≥90% preservation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and no stage upgrading of chronic kidney disease. Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified risk factors associated with lack of the optimal outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted for survival outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Analysis was conducted for 157 patients (median follow-up 26 mo). The median tumor size was 7.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 5.0-7.8) and the median RENAL score was 9 (IQR 8-10). Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 242 ml (IQR 121-354) and the median WIT was 19 min (IQR 15-25). A total of 150 patients (95.5%) had negative margins. Complications were noted in 25 patients (15.9%), with 4.5% having Clavien grade 3-5 complications. The median change in eGFR was 7 ml/min/1.72 m2, with ≥90% eGFR preservation in 55.4%. The trifecta outcome was achieved for 64.3% and the optimal outcome for 37.6% of the patients. MVA revealed that greater age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06; p = 0.002), increasing RENAL score (OR 1.30; p = 0.035), and EBL >300 ml (OR 5.96, p = 0.006) were predictive of failure to achieve optimal outcome. The 5-yr recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, were 82.1%, 93.3%, and 91.3%, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS RAPN for select cT3a renal masses is feasible and safe, with acceptable quality outcomes. Further investigation is requisite to delineate the role of RAPN in cT3a RCC. PATIENT SUMMARY Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with stage 3a kidney cancer provided acceptable survival, functional, and morbidity outcomes in the hands of experienced surgeons, and may be considered as an option when clinically indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendrick Yim
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Urological Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Koon H Rha
- Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Ben Challacombe
- Department of Urology, Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology, Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Quarto
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Devin Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sunil Patel
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ahmet Bindayi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Akbar N Ashrafi
- Urological Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Urological Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ali Alqahtani
- Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Jay Sulek
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Nicolo De Luyk
- Department of Urology, Guys and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Uzoma Anele
- Division of Urology, VCU Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Inderbir S Gill
- Urological Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sisto Perdona
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|