Novel Classification for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma to Better Risk-stratify Patients Eligible for Kidney-sparing Strategies: An International Collaborative Study

Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group)

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.

Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group)

BACKGROUND

The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors.

METHODS

The ROBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. High-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. A survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. After adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±SD) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0.6), metastasis-free survival (P=0.5) and overall survival (P=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. At last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.

Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Endoscopic Management Decision Making in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram that predicts low-grade, non-muscle invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (LG-NMI UTUC), thereby aiding in the accurate selection of endoscopic management (EM) candidates.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 454 patients who underwent radical surgery (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and 26 patients who received EM (Cohort 3). Utilizing a multivariate logistic regression model, a nomogram predicting LG-NMI UTUC was developed based on data from Cohort 1. The nomogram's accuracy was compared with conventional European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) models. External validation was performed using Cohort 2 data, and the nomogram's prognostic value was evaluated via disease progression metrics in Cohort 3.

RESULTS

In Cohort 1, multivariate analyses highlighted the absence of invasive disease on imaging (odds ratio [OR] 7.04; p = 0.011), absence of hydronephrosis (OR 2.06; p = 0.027), papillary architecture (OR 24.9; p < 0.001), and lack of high-grade urine cytology (OR 0.22; p < 0.001) as independent predictive factors for LG-NMI disease. The nomogram outperformed the two conventional models in predictive accuracy (0.869 vs. 0.759-0.821) and exhibited a higher net benefit in decision curve analysis. The model's clinical efficacy was corroborated in Cohort 2. Moreover, the nomogram stratified disease progression-free survival rates in Cohort 3.

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram ( https://kmur.shinyapps.io/UTUC_URS/ ) accurately predicts LG-NMI UTUC, thereby identifying suitable candidates for EM. Additionally, the model serves as a useful tool for prognostic stratification in patients undergoing EM.

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review

Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.

Modern Kidney-Sparing Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To review the latest evidence on the modern techniques and outcomes of kidney-sparing surgeries (KSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search on the study topic was conducted before 30 April 2023 using electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. A narrative overview of the literature was then provided based on the extracted data and a qualitative synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

KSS is recommended for low- as well as select high-risk UTUCs who are not eligible for radical treatments. Endoscopic ablation is a KSS option that is associated with similar oncological outcomes compared with radical treatments while preserving renal function in well-selected patients. The other option in this setting is distal ureterectomy, which has the advantage of providing a definitive pathological stage and grade. Data from retrospective studies support the superiority of this approach over radical treatment with similar oncological outcomes, albeit in select cases. Novel chemoablation agents have also been studied in the past few years, of which mitomycin gel has received FDA approval for use in low-risk UTUCs.

CONCLUSION

KSSs are acceptable approaches for patients with low- and select high-risk UTUCs, which preserve renal function without compromising the oncological outcomes.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The Fundació Puigvert's Experience

Objectives: Many patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) outside of the low-risk criteria may possess low absolute risks of distant progression. Herein, we hypothesized that careful selection of high-risk patients undergoing an endoscopic approach could result in acceptable oncologic outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients with high-risk UTUC managed endoscopically between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained single academic institution database. Elective and imperative indications for endoscopic treatment were considered. Regarding elective indications, the decision to perform endoscopic treatment was systematically proposed to high-risk patients in whom macroscopically complete ablation was deemed feasible, excluding invasive appearance on CT scan, and without histologic variant. Results: A total of 60 patients with high-risk UTUC met our inclusion criteria (29 imperative and 31 elective indications). The median follow-up in patients without any event was 36 months. At 5 years, the estimated overall survival, cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival, UTUC recurrence-free survival, radical nephroureterectomy-free survival, and bladder recurrence-free survival were 57% (41-79), 75% (57-99), 86% (71-100), 56% (40-76), 81% (70-93), and 69% (54-88), respectively. All oncologic outcomes were similar between patients with elective and imperative indications (all log-rank p > 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, we report the first large series of endoscopic treatment in patients with high-risk UTUC, arguing that promising oncologic outcomes can be achieved in properly selected candidates. We encourage multi-institutional collaborative work as a large cohort of high-risk patients treated endoscopically may allow subgroup analyses to define the best candidates.

Learning from the past and present to change the future: Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Current guidelines recommend endoscopic management (EM) for patients with low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as those with an imperative indication. However, regardless of the tumor risk, radical nephroureterectomy is still mainly performed worldwide despite the benefits of EM, such as renal function maintenance, no hemodialysis requirement, and treatment cost reduction. This might be explained by the association of EM with a high risk of local recurrence and progression. Furthermore, the need for rigorous patient selection and close surveillance following EM may be relevant. Nevertheless, recent developments in diagnostic modalities, pathological evaluation, surgical devices and techniques, and intracavitary regimens have been reported, which may contribute to improved risk stratification and treatments with superior oncological outcomes. In this review, considering recent advances in endourology and oncology, we propose novel treatment strategies for optimal EM.

Kidney‐sparing surgery for distal high‐risk ureteral carcinoma: Clinical efficacy and preliminary experiences in 22 patients

BACKGROUND

Several groups proved kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) had equivalent oncological outcomes compared with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for the low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Whereas, the clinical efficacy of KSS for high-risk UTUC, especially for distal high-risk ureteral carcinoma, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of KSS for patients with distal high-risk ureter cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 22 patients who diagnose the distal high-risk ureter cancer and underwent KSS between May 2012 and July 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Overall survival (OS), confirmed as the primary endpoint of present study, was assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoints included the postoperative SF-36 (the short form 36 health survey questionnaire) score, progression-free survival (PFS), postoperative complications, and so on.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 (77.3%) and 5 (22.7%) patients underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) and endoscopic ablation (EA), respectively. By the cut-off date, the mean OS was 76.3 months (95% Cl: 51.3-101.1 months) and the mean PFS was 47.0 months (95% Cl: 31.1-62.8 months), respectively. And the SF-36 score in a majority of patients was >300 (90.9%).

CONCLUSION

This is a daring endeavor to explore the clinical efficacy of KSS in distal high-risk ureter cancer based on the high-risk UTUC criteria, which shows satisfactory results in the long-term prognosis and operation-associated outcomes. However, future randomized or prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate our conclusions.

Oncological Outcomes of Distal Ureterectomy for High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study by The French Bladder Cancer Committee

Simple Summary

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It implies significant reduction in the renal function, compromising adjuvant chemotherapy administration and leading to risk of end stage renal disease in frail patients. Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear mainly due to concern about potential upper tract recurrences. The objective of our retrospective study was to determine the oncologic outcomes of DU for high-risk UTUC of the pelvic ureter, and to assess factors associated with recurrence in the particular population. We showed that oncological outcomes after DU were similar to those after RNU. Some of the classical prognostic factors after RNU were not identified in this cohort, pinpointing the necessity to consider tumors of the distal ureter as a specific entity.

Abstract

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon disease and its gold-standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes of DU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with UTUC who underwent DU. The primary endpoint was 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), followed by overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free (IVR) and homolateral urinary tract recurrence-free (HUR) survivals as secondary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to assess factors associated with outcomes. 155 patients were included, 91% of which were high-risk. 5-year CSS was 84.4%, OS was 71.9%, IVR-free survival was 43.6% and HUR-free survival was 74.4%. Multifocality, high grade and tumor size were the most significant predictors of survival endpoints. Of note, neither hydronephrosis nor pre-operative diagnostic ureteroscopy/JJ stent were associated with any of the endpoints. Perioperative morbidity was minimal. In conclusion, DU stands as a possible alternative to RNU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. Close monitoring is mandatory due to the high risk of recurrence in the remaining urinary tract.

Survival and Long-term Effects of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy on Kidney Function in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Background

Current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines discriminate between high- and low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to determine treatment by means of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or kidney-sparing surgery (KSS).

Objective

To compare long-term oncological outcomes and renal function for patients with UTUC treated by RNU versus KSS.

Design, setting, and participants

A retrospective cohort study, including 186 renal units with nonmetastatic UTUC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021, was conducted.

Intervention

RNU, ureterorenoscopy, percutaneous tumour resection, and segmental ureteral resection.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and renal function were analysed by means of the log-rank test and the independent-sample t test.

Results and limitations

OS was 71.1% for the RNU group and 81.9% for the KSS group. In a cohort matched for propensity weight based on EAU risk stratification progression-free survival (PFS; RNU 96.0%; KSS 86.0%), MFS (RNU 72.0%; KSS 84.0%), CSS (RNU 84.0%; KSS 86.0%), and OS (RNU 76.0%; KSS 76.0%) were all similar between both groups. No significant differences in renal function were seen at 2 and 5 yr after the intervention. Although this series represents the largest cohort of (high-risk) UTUC patients treated by means of KSS to date, it is not suitable for performing a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS were all comparable when analysing the RNU and KSS groups. Similar results for groups with evenly distributed risk factors and a large percentage of high-risk disease suggest that current risk stratification might not be accurate in discriminating low-risk from high-risk disease.

Patient summary

In this report, we looked at outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in a specialised hospital. We conclude that kidney-sparing surgery and radical nephroureterectomy have comparable outcomes and that risk factors for worse outcome might not be identified correctly.

The Impact of Diabetes on the Prognosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Studies have reported that diabetes is related to the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), but this conclusion is still controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively explore the association between diabetes and UTUC prognosis.

Methods

In November 2020, we searched PubMed, Web of science and the Cochrane Library to find relevant studies that evaluated the effect of diabetes on the prognosis of UTUC. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. Review Manager 5.3 was used to pool cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and intravesical recurrence (IVR).

Results

A total of 10 studies with 11,303 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled results showed that diabetes did not affect the survival outcome of UTUC, including CSS (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.89-1.98; P = 0.16), OS (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.77-1.80; P = 0.45) and RFS (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.91-2.05; P = 0.13). However, diabetes increased the risk of IVR of UTUC patients (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.43; P = 0.0004).

Conclusion

Although diabetes has no significant impact on the survival outcomes of UTUC after RNU, it increases the risk of IVR. Therefore, special attention should be paid to monitoring the IVR for UTUC patients with diabetes and the necessity of appropriate intravesical adjuvant treatment when needed.

Concomitant carcinoma in situ is an independent prognostic predictor for patients with localized lymph node–negative upper-tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy

Purpose:

This study aimed to determine the predictive value of concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy.

Methods:

This was a retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological features in a cohort of 126 patients with localized lymph node–negative UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder-cuff excision in a tertiary medical center between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2018. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for CSS in UTUC. Additionally, Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed in subgroups according to pathological tumor stage.

Results:

The median age and follow-up duration were 70 years and 3.5 years, respectively. Concomitant CIS, which was present in 21% of the patient specimens, was not associated with most clinical or pathological features, except for lymphovascular invasion and multifocality. Concomitant CIS (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=4.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78–12.06, p=0.002) and pathological tumor stage (adjusted HR=4.07, 95% CI 1.99–8.31, p<0.001) were significantly associated with CSS in the multivariate Cox regression model. In the subgroup analysis, concomitant CIS in patients with locally advanced (pT3/pT4) UTUC was associated with significantly worse CSS compared to those without CIS (HR=3.83, 95% CI 1.20–12.21).

Conclusion:

The pathological presence of concomitant CIS was independently associated with poor CSS in patients with localized lymph node–negative UTUC undergoing radical nephroureterectomy. These findings provide crucial information relevant for postoperative patient counseling, use of adjuvant therapy, follow-up intensity, and clinical trial enrollment.

Level of evidence

Level II.