Current evidence on traditional Chinese exercises for cancer-related fatigue: a quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials

Non-pharmacologic interventions for improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF): A systematic review of systematic reviews and pooled meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Literature encloses numerous systematic reviews (SRs) on nonpharmacologic interventions for improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF). The effect of these interventions remains controversial, and the available SRs have not been synthesized yet. We conducted a systematic synthesis of SRs and meta-analysis to determine the effect of nonpharmacologic interventions on CRF in adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We systematically searched 4 databases. The effect sizes (standard mean difference) were quantitatively pooled using a random-effects model. Chi-squared (Q) and I-square statistics (I²) tested the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We selected 28 SRs, including 35 eligible meta-analyses. The pooled effect size (standard mean difference, 95% CI) was -0.67 (-1.16, -0.18). The subgroup analysis by types of interventions showed a significant effect in all the investigated approaches (complementary integrative medicine, physical exercise, self-management/e-health interventions).

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that nonpharmacologic interventions are associated with CRF reduction. Future research should focus on testing these interventions on specific population clusters and trajectories.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020194258.

The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Cancer-Related Fatigue in Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) has an enormous adverse impact on quality of life and subsequent therapy of cancer patients. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is reported to improve CRF in many systematic reviews (SRs), but the effects are controversial because of variations in the quality and outcomes.

METHODS

Thirteen databases were searched from inception to September 2022. Only SRs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We assessed the quality of included SRs with the AMSTAR-2 tool, the strength of evidence with the GRADE system, the risk of bias with the ROBIS tool, and the integrity of SRs with the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

We included 30 eligible SRs (27 meta-analyses). Based on the AMSTAR-2 tool, 29 SRs were rated as "critically low" quality, and only one was rated as "low" quality. With the ROBIS tool, 19 SRs demonstrated a low risk of bias. According to the PRISMA checklist, no SRs reported all the items, and 10 SRs sufficiently reported over 70%. Based on the GRADE system, 7 outcomes were assessed as high-quality evidence.

CONCLUSION

This overview demonstrates promising evidence for the effectiveness of CAM interventions in the treatment of CRF in adults. The roles of qigong, music, auricular point therapy, and dietary supplements in CRF need further evaluation. Although findings are mixed, it is recommend to select appropriate CAM to manage cancer-related fatigue under the guidance of physicians. More studies with rigorous methodological designs and sufficient sample sizes are needed.

A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and a Pooled Meta-Analysis on Complementary and Integrative Medicine for Improving Cancer-Related Fatigue

PURPOSE

Evidence supporting complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) for improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is still fragmented. This study therefore critically appraised all the systematic reviews (SRs) regarding the effectiveness of CIM in mitigating CRF in adults.

METHODS

A systematic review of SRs and a meta-analysis were conducted in 4 databases. The effect sizes of the included SRs were quantitatively pooled (standardized mean difference [SMD]; 95% CI) using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was tested by using χ² (Q) tests and I² statistics.

FINDINGS

Twenty-two SRs met the inclusion criteria, and results from 20 SRs underwent meta-analysis. The pooled significant estimate of fatigue reduction was as follows: SMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.32; P < 0.001. The subgroup analysis based on the type of CIM intervention revealed that the approach showing higher effects in reducing fatigue thus far is acupuncture: SMD, -0.99; 95% CI = -1.37 to -0.62, P < 0.001; I² = 84%. CIM therapies showed a significant reduction of fatigue in patients with breast cancer: SMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.23; P < 0.001; I² = 82%.

IMPLICATIONS

CIM interventions showed effectiveness in reducing CRF. Subgroup analysis suggested some potential influencing, such as tumor type and specific CIM therapy factors, that require in-depth assessment in future research. Study protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42020194254.

Development and validation of a Tai chi intervention protocol for managing the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster in female breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To develop an evidence-based tai chi intervention protocol for managing the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster (FSDSC) in breast cancer (BC) patients.

METHODS

The Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (the MRC framework) was utilized to guide the study design. This study focused on Phase І of the MRC framework-the development of the intervention-to develop an evidence-based tai chi intervention protocol for managing the FSDSC in BC patients based on existing research evidence, theories, practice standards/guidelines, and experts' consensus. An extensive literature search was performed to identify current systematic reviews, theories, and practice standards/guidelines that can be utilized to inform the intervention dosage and techniques of tai chi and practice instructions. Content validity assessment was also conducted to assess the content validity of the tai chi protocol through expert panel consensus. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated to identify whether the intervention required further refinement.

RESULTS

The components of the tai chi protocol were identified by current research evidence and relevant practice standards/guidelines, including the selection of an appropriate tai chi modality and intensity and the duration of the intervention. The Easy 8 form Yang-style tai chi was selected based on the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American College of Sports Medicine, and China's State Commission for Physical Culture and Sports. The intensity and duration of the tai chi intervention were scheduled, respectively, twice per week, with each session lasting about one hour, for eight weeks based on the current systematic review evidence on traditional Chinese exercise for the alleviation of cancer-related symptoms. The practise techniques of tai chi were identified from practise standards released by the State Sport General Administration of China. All the items in the tai chi protocol were determined to be content valid after the first round of rating, with all item-level CVIs at 1.00. The scale-level CVI for the tai chi protocol was also identified as excellent, at 1.00.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-based tai chi program for managing the FSDSC in BC patients was developed by following the MRC framework. The results provided a clear specification of the tai chi intervention protocol for healthcare professionals and researchers in the next phase of the study-pilot testing the tai chi intervention protocol for FSDSC management through a preliminary randomized controlled trial.

Current Evidence on Traditional Chinese Exercise for Cancers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) has gradually become one of the widespread complementary therapies for treatment and recovery of cancers. However, evidence based on the systematic evaluation of its efficacy is lacking, and there appears to be no conclusion regarding the setting of TCE interventions. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that outline the effects of TCE on cancer patients. Relevant studies were searched by GOOGLE SCHOLAR, SCIENCEDIRECT, and WEB OF SCIENCE using “traditional Chinese exercise” and “cancer.” Only RCTs published in peer-reviewed English journals were included. A total of 27 studies covering 1616 cancer patients satisfied the eligibility criteria for this review. Despite the methodological limitation and relatively high risk of bias possessed by some included studies, positive evidence was still detected on the effects of TCE on these cancer-related health outcomes in physical, psychological, and physiological parameters. The 60-min or 90-min course of TCE intervention for two to three times per week for 10 to 12 weeks was found to be the most common setting in these studies and has effectively benefited cancer patients. These findings add scientific support to encourage cancer patients to practice TCE during or after conventional medical treatment. Nevertheless, future well-designed RCTs with improved methodology and larger sample size on this field are much warranted for further verification.

Clinical management of cancer-related fatigue in hospitalized adult patients: a best practice implementation project

OBJECTIVES

This project aimed to identify and promote evidence-based practice in the management of cancer related fatigue (CRF) in the oncology unit of Nanfang Hospital, affiliated with the Southern Medical University in People's Republic of China.

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer and significantly affects their functioning and quality of life. However, it is often inadequately addressed and evidence-based practices are not always followed.

METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) has a validated audit and feedback tool to assist with best practice implementation audits. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) was used in this project. A three-phase project was undertaken: i) a pre-implementation audit of current practice against evidence-based audit criteria, ii) identification of barriers and implementation of strategies to improve practice using the JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool and iii) a post-implementation audit.

RESULTS

The baseline audit results identified non-compliance to best practice in all areas of CRF. Strategies to improve practice involved relevant education for nurses, establishment of a CRF management routine and related documentation systems and displaying and distributing educational materials for the patients. Improved compliance was shown across all audit criteria in post-evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of institution specific evidence-based resources demonstrated immediate improvement in CRF management and practice. Continuous effort is required to maintain changes and further improve practice. Future projects should focus on measuring the impact of changed practice on patient outcomes.

Ameliorative effects of Tai Chi on cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of Tai Chi on cancer-related fatigue (CRF).

METHODS

Nine databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and four Chinese databases) were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of Tai Chi on CRF. The reference lists given in the identified RCTs were also reviewed to identify potentially relevant studies.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 373 patients were included. The change in short- and long-term CRF (SCRF and LCRF, respectively) was calculated as the change in the mean score for CRF from baseline to the end of intervention period and to the end of post-intervention follow-up, respectively. Pooled results suggested that Tai Chi had a significant positive effect on standard mean difference (i.e., SCRF; SMD = - 0.54; p < 0.0001), but the impact on LCRF remained unclear. Subgroup analyses of SCRF indicated positive effects of Tai Chi among patients with breast (SMD = - 0.81; p < 0.00001) and lung cancer (SMD = - 0.50; p = 0.002), but not prostate cancer (p = 0.98). Tai Chi also had effects on SCRF that were superior to physical exercise and psychological support (SMD = - 0.49 and - 0.84, respectively; both p < 0.05). A longer intervention time (8-12 weeks) benefited SCRF more than a shorter time (SMD = - 1.08 and - 0.36, respectively; both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tai Chi for more than 8 weeks has short-term ameliorative effects on CRF, especially among patients with breast and lung cancer. Its beneficial effects are superior to physical exercise and psychological support. It remains unclear whether there are long-term benefits, and further study is needed.