The reliability and validity of instruments measuring pattern identification in Korean medicine: A systematic review

Individualized Diagnosis and Prescription in Traditional Medicine: Decision-Making Process Analysis and Machine Learning-Based Analysis Tool Development

While pattern identification (PI) is an essential process in traditional medicine (TM), it is difficult to objectify since it relies heavily on implicit knowledge. Therefore, this study aimed to propose a machine learning (ML)-based analysis tool to evaluate the clinical decision-making process of PI in terms of explicit and implicit knowledge, and to observe the actual process by which this knowledge affects the choice of diagnosis and treatment in individual TM doctors. Clinical data for the development of the analysis tool were collected using a questionnaire administered to allergic rhinitis (AR) patients and the diagnosis and prescription results of TM doctors based on the completed AR questionnaires. Explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge were defined based on the doctors' explicit scoring and feature evaluations of ML models, respectively. There were many differences between the explicit and implicit importance scores in this study. Implicit importance is more closely related to explicit importance in prescription than in diagnosis. The analysis results for eight doctors showed that our tool could successfully identify explicit and implicit knowledge in the PI process. This is the first study to evaluate the actual process by which explicit and implicit knowledge affect the choice of individual TM doctors and to identify assessment tools for the definition of the decision-making process in diagnosing PI and prescribing herbal treatments by TM clinicians. The assessment tool suggested in this study could be broadly used for the standardization of precision medicine, including TM therapeutics.

A novel reliability-based regression model for medical modeling and forecasting

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In recent decades, modeling and forecasting have played a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of different diseases. Various forecasting models have been developed to improve data-based decision-making processes in medical systems. Although these models differ in many aspects, they all originate from the assumption that more generalizable results are achieved by more accurate models. This means that accuracy is considered as the only prominent feature to evaluate the generalizability of forecasting models. On the other side, due to the changeable medical situations and even changeable models' results, making stable and reliable performance is necessary to adopt appropriate medical decisions. Hence, reliability and stability of models' performance is another effective factor on the model's generalizability that should be taken into consideration in developing medical forecasting models.

METHODS

In this paper, a new reliability-based forecasting approach is developed to address this gap and achieve more consistent performance in making medical predictions. The proposed approach is implemented on the classic regression model which is a common accuracy-based statistical method in medical fields. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model, it has been performed by using two medical benchmark datasets from UCI and obtained results are compared with the classic regression model.

RESULTS

Empirical results show that the proposed model has outperformed the classic regression model in terms of error criteria such as MSE and MAE. So, the presented model can be utilized as an appropriate alternative for the traditional regression model in making effective medical decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the obtained results, the proposed model can be an appropriate alternative for traditional multiple linear regression for modeling in real-world applications, especially when more generalization and/or more reliability is needed.