1
|
Agosti V, Munari E. Histopathological evaluation and grading for prostate cancer: current issues and crucial aspects. Asian J Androl 2024; 26:575-581. [PMID: 39254403 PMCID: PMC11614181 DOI: 10.4103/aja202440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT A crucial aspect of prostate cancer grading, especially in low- and intermediate-risk cancer, is the accurate identification of Gleason pattern 4 glands, which includes ill-formed or fused glands. However, there is notable inconsistency among pathologists in recognizing these glands, especially when mixed with pattern 3 glands. This inconsistency has significant implications for patient management and treatment decisions. Conversely, the recognition of glomeruloid and cribriform architecture has shown higher reproducibility. Cribriform architecture, in particular, has been linked to the worst prognosis among pattern 4 subtypes. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is also associated with high-grade cancer and poor prognosis. Accurate identification, classification, and tumor size evaluation by pathologists are vital for determining patient treatment. This review emphasizes the importance of prostate cancer grading, highlighting challenges like distinguishing between pattern 3 and pattern 4 and the prognostic implications of cribriform architecture and intraductal proliferations. It also addresses the inherent grading limitations due to interobserver variability and explores the potential of computational pathology to enhance pathologist accuracy and consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Agosti
- Section of Pathology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia 25121, Italy
| | - Enrico Munari
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona 37126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Zhou Y, Zhou P, Xue Y, Hu S. Importance of biopsy sample length for cancer diagnosis during trans-perineal prostate biopsy. BMC Urol 2024; 24:209. [PMID: 39342172 PMCID: PMC11438266 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01596-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the factors that determine the minimum length of biopsy sample required for accurate diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1202 cases that underwent rectal ultrasound-guided trans-perineal prostate biopsy (TPB) with standardized biopsy surgical procedures and pathological evaluation. Logistic regression correlation analysis and the imbalance between groups was eliminated by propensity score matching of patients' own factors between groups (positive group and negative group). ROC curve optimal threshold analysis were performed to identify the independent factors associated with cancer detection rate and the minimum length of biopsy sample required for accurate diagnosis. RESULTS The study included 1202 cases that underwent standardized 8-18 needle initial puncture biopsies from June 2020 to October 2023. The cancer detection rate was 40.02% (481/1202), with Gleason scores of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 in 164, 134, 107, 67, and 9 patients, respectively. The percentage of patients with clinical significance (International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥ 2) was 65.90% (317/481). Multivariate analysis showed that age,prostate-specific antigen(PSA), prostate volume,positive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and length of biopsy samples were significant factors (P < 0.05)。Interestingly, biopsy sample length did not correlate with the prostate volume (Pearson correlation P = 0.069). ROC curve analysis: The area under the curve AUC for sample length were 0.674 and 0.664 at before and after propensity score matching,respectively; the optimal thresholds were 12.25 mm and 11.00mm at before and after propensity score matching,respectively. CONCLUSION The independent predictors of cancer detection rate during TPB are age, PSA, prostate volume, positive mp-MRI, and sample length. Among these, sample length is the most critical indicator affecting puncture quality, and the minimum value of biopsy sample length to be obtained is 11.00mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaisheng Zhu
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 365 East Renming Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000, China.
| | - Yiyi Zhu
- Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Second Hospital to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Yibo Zhou
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 365 East Renming Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000, China
| | - Penfei Zhou
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 365 East Renming Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000, China
| | - Yadong Xue
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 365 East Renming Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000, China
| | - Shengye Hu
- Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 365 East Renming Road, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321000, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, Piazza P, Scarcella S, Bianchi L, Falagario U, Turri F, Andras I, Di Maida F, De Groote R, Piramide F, Moschovas MC, Suardi N, Terrone C, Carrieri G, Patel V, Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Vickers A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Larcher A. Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:821-828. [PMID: 38036328 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remains controversial, with prior studies showing that, in contrast with evidence on open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence rates of experienced versus inexperienced surgeons did not differ. OBJECTIVE To characterize the learning curve for positive surgical margins (PSMs) after RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed the data of 13 090 patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP by one of 74 surgeons from ten institutions in Europe and North America between 2003 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable models were used to assess the association between surgeon experience at the time of each patient's operation and PSMs after surgery, with adjustment for preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, grade, stage, and year of surgery. Surgeon experience was coded as the number of robotic radical prostatectomies done by the surgeon before the index patient's operation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 2838 (22%) men had PSMs on final pathology. After adjusting for case mix, we found a significant, nonlinear association between surgical experience and probability of PSMs after surgery, with a lower risk of PSMs for greater surgeon experience (p < 0.0001). The probabilities of PSMs for a patient treated by a surgeon with ten, 250, 500, and 2000 prior robotic procedures were 26%, 21%, 18%, and 14%, respectively (absolute risk difference between ten and 2000 procedures: 11%; 95% confidence interval: 9%, 14%). Similar results were found after stratifying patients according to extracapsular extension at final pathology. Results were also unaltered after excluding surgeons who had moved between institutions. CONCLUSIONS While we characterized the learning curve for PSMs after RARP, the relative contribution of surgical learning to the achievement of optimal outcomes remains controversial. Future investigations should focus on what experienced surgeons do to avoid positive margins and should explore the relationship between learning, margin rate, and biochemical recurrence. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients receiving robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, we characterized the learning curve for positive margins. The risk of surgical margins decreased progressively with increasing experience, and plateaued around the 500th procedure. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors has implications for surgeons and patients, and it may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy; Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Federico Piramide
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, Ospedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leni R, Roscigno M, Barzaghi P, La Croce G, Catellani M, Saccà A, de Angelis M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Da Pozzo LF. Medium-term follow up of active surveillance for early prostate cancer at a non-academic institution. BJU Int 2024; 133:614-621. [PMID: 38093673 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) at a single non-academic institution adopting the standardised Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS Competing risk analyses estimated the incidence of overall mortality, metastases, conversion to treatment, and grade reclassification. The incidence of reclassification and adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy were compared between patients fulfilling all PRIAS inclusion criteria vs those not fulfilling at least one. RESULTS We analysed 341 men with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer (PCa) followed on AS between 2010 and 2022. There were no PCa deaths, two patients developed distant metastases and were alive at the end of the study period. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastases was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-6.4%). A total of 111 men were reclassified, and 127 underwent definitive treatment. Men not fulfilling at least one PRIAS inclusion criteria (n = 43) had a higher incidence of reclassification (subdistribution hazards ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.81; P = 0.03), but similar rates of adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION Metastases in men on AS at a non-academic institution are as rare as those reported in established international cohorts. Men followed without stringent inclusion criteria should be counselled about the higher incidence of reclassification and reassured they can expect rates of adverse pathological findings comparable to those fulfilling all criteria. Therefore, AS should be proposed to all men with low-grade PCa regardless of whether they are followed at academic institutions or smaller community hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Leni
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Roscigno
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paolo Barzaghi
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonino Saccà
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stabile A, Gandaglia G, Dehò F, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Re: Caroline M. Moore, Lauren E. King, John Withington, et al. Best Current Practice and Research Priorities in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-A Report of a Movember International Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol Oncol. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:160-82. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:540. [PMID: 37263905 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Dehò
- Unit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy; University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, Mazzone E, Moschovas MC, Falagario U, Piazza P, Scarcella S, Bednarz C, Sarchi L, Tappero S, Knipper S, De Groote R, Sjoberg D, Schiavina R, Suardi N, Terrone C, Autorino R, Carrieri G, Galosi A, Galfano A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Patel V, Vickers A, Mottrie A. The Surgical Learning Curve for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:414-421. [PMID: 35850976 PMCID: PMC10795739 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved cancer control with increasing surgical experience-the learning curve-was demonstrated for open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. In a prior single-center study, we found that this might not be the case for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between prior experience of a surgeon and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 8101 patients with prostate cancer treated with RARP by 46 surgeons at nine institutions between 2003 and 2021. Surgical experience was coded as the total number of robotic prostatectomies performed by the surgeon before the patient operation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We evaluated the relationship of prior surgeon experience with the probability of BCR adjusting for preoperative prostate-specific antigen, pathologic stage, grade, lymph-node involvement, and year of surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 1047 patients had BCR. The median follow-up for patients without BCR was 33 mo (interquartile range: 14, 61). After adjusting for case mix, the relationship between surgical experience and the risk of BCR after surgery was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). The 5-yr BCR-free survival rates for a patient treated by a surgeon with prior 10, 250, and 1000 procedures performed were, respectively, 82.0%, 82.7%, and 84.8% (absolute difference between 10 and 1000 prior procedures: 1.6% [95% confidence interval: 0.4%, 3.3%). Results were robust to a number of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that, as opposed to open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, surgeons performing RARP achieve adequate cancer control in the early phase of their career. Further research should explore why the learning curve for robotic surgery differs from prior findings for open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We hypothesize that surgical education, including simulation training and the adoption of objective performance metrics, is an important mechanism for flattening the learning curve. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the relationship between biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and surgeon's experience. Surgeons at an early stage of their career had similar outcomes to those of more experienced surgeons, and we hypothesized that surgical education in robotics might be an important determinant of such a finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Falagario
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy
| | | | - Luca Sarchi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Andrea Galosi
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Montorsi F, Scuderi S, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. Re: Melline G.M. Schilham, Mark Rijpkema, Tom Scheenen, et al. How Advanced Imaging Will Guide Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in the Years to Come. Eur Urol 2022;82:578-80. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e132. [PMID: 36774224 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bravi CA, Heidenreich A, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Cucchiara V, Osmonov D, Juenemann K, Karnes RJ, Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Stief C, Hiester A, Albers P, Devos G, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Tilki D, Graefen M, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Pfister D. Combining PSA and PET features to select candidates for salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:123-129. [PMID: 36569505 PMCID: PMC9766859 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relationship between pre-operative PSA value, 68Ga-prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) PET performance and oncologic outcomes after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods The study included 164 patients diagnosed with ≤2 pelvic lymph-node recurrence(s) of PCa documented on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan and treated with pelvic ± retroperitoneal sLND at 11 high-volume centres between 2012 and 2019. Pathologic findings were correlated to PSA values at time of sLND, categorized in early (<0.5 ng/ml), low (0.5-0.99 ng/ml), moderate (1-1.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml). Clinical recurrence (CR)-free survival after sLND was calculated using multivariable analyses and plotted over pre-operative PSA value. Results Median [interquartile range (IQR)] PSA at sLND was 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) ng/ml, and 131 (80%) patients had one positive spot at PET scan. All patients received pelvic sLND, whereas 91 (55%) men received also retroperitoneal dissection. Median (IQR) number of node removed was 15 (6, 28). The rate of positive pathology increased as a function of pre-operative PSA value, with highest rates for patients with pre-operative PSA > 1.5 ng/ml (pelvic-only sLNDs: 84%; pelvic + retroperitoneal sLNDs: 90%). After sLND, PSA ≤ 0.3 ng/ml was detected in 67 (41%) men. On multivariable analyses, pre-operative PSA was associated with PSA response (p < 0.0001). There were 51 CRs after sLND. After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant, non-linear relationship between PSA level at sLND and the 12-month CR-free survival (p < 0.0001), with the highest probability of freedom from CR for patients who received sLND at PSA level ≥1 ng/ml. Conclusions In case of PET-detected nodal recurrences amenable to sLND, salvage surgery was associated with the highest short-term oncologic outcomes when performed in men with PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml. Awaiting confirmatory data from prospective trials, these findings may help physicians to optimize the timing for 68Ga-PSMA PET in biochemical recurrent PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A. Bravi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
- Department of UrologyOLV Ziekenhuis AalstAalstBelgium
- ORSI AcademyGhentBelgium
| | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino HospitalUniversity of GenovaGenoaItaly
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Campus KielUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinKielGermany
| | - Klaus‐Peter Juenemann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Campus KielUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinKielGermany
| | | | | | | | - Christian Stief
- Department of UrologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐UniversityMunichGermany
| | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical FacultyHeinrich‐Heine‐UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of UrologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive HealthSechenov UniversityMoscowRussia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Martini‐Klinik Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Martini‐Klinik Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Inderbir S. Gill
- USC Institute of UrologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- Department of UrologyOLV Ziekenhuis AalstAalstBelgium
- ORSI AcademyGhentBelgium
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitUniversity of Montreal Health CentreMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - David Pfister
- Department of UrologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nocera L, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Wenzel M, Wurnschimmel C, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Mirone V, Chun FKH, Shariat SF, Graefen M, Saad F, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Predicting the probability of pT3 or higher pathological stage at radical prostatectomy: COVID19-specific considerations. Front Oncol 2022; 12:990851. [PMID: 36561531 PMCID: PMC9763886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We tested whether a model identifying prostate cancer (PCa) patients at risk of pT3-4/pN1 can be developed for use during COVID19 pandemic, in order to guarantee appropriate treatment to patients harboring advanced disease patients without compromising sustainability of care delivery. Methods Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database 2010-2016, we identified 27,529 patients with localized PCa and treated with radical prostatectomy. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting presence of pT3-4/pN1 disease was fitted within a development cohort (n=13,977, 50.8%). Subsequently, external validation (n=13,552, 49.2%) and head-to-head comparison with NCCN risk group stratification was performed. Results In model development, age, PSA, biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) and percentage of positive biopsy cores were independent predictors of pT3-4/pN1 stage. In external validation, prediction of pT3-4/pN1 with novel nomogram was 74% accurate versus 68% for NCCN risk group stratification. Nomogram achieved better calibration and showed net-benefit over NCCN risk group stratification in decision curve analyses. The use of nomogram cut-off of 49% resulted in pT3-4/pN1 rate of 65%, instead of the average 35%. Conclusion The newly developed, externally validated nomogram predicts presence of pT3-4/pN1 better than NCCN risk group stratification and allows to focus radical prostatectomy treatment on individuals at highest risk of pT3-4/pN1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy,*Correspondence: Luigi Nocera,
| | - Lara F. Stolzenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Wurnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czechia,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mischinger J, Schöllnast H, Zurl H, Geyer M, Fischereder K, Adelsmayr G, Igrec J, Fritz G, Merdzo-Hörmann M, Elstner J, Schmid J, Triebl A, Trimmel V, Reiter C, Steiner J, Rosenlechner D, Seles M, Pichler GP, Pichler M, Riedl J, Schöpfer-Schwab S, Strobl J, Hutterer GC, Zigeuner R, Pummer K, Augustin H, Ahyai S, Mannweiler S, Fuchsjäger M, Talakic E. Combining targeted and systematic prostate biopsy improves prostate cancer detection and correlation with the whole mount histopathology in biopsy naïve and previous negative biopsy patients. Front Surg 2022; 9:1013389. [PMID: 36277287 PMCID: PMC9582510 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1013389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Guidelines for previous negative biopsy (PNB) cohorts with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) after positive multiparametric (mp) magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI) often favour the fusion-guided targeted prostate-biopsy (TB) only approach for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions. However, recommendations lack direct biopsy performance comparison within biopsy naïve (BN) vs. PNB patients and its prognostication of the whole mount pathology report (WMPR), respectively. We suppose, that the combination of TB and concomitant TRUS-systematic biopsy (SB) improves the PCa detection rate of PI-RADS 2, 3, 4 or 5 lesions and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-grade predictability of the WMPR in BN- and PNB patients. Methods Patients with suspicious mpMRI, elevated prostate-specific-antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination were included. All PI-RADS reports were intramurally reviewed for biopsy planning. We compared the PI-RADS score substratified TB, SB or combined approach (TB/SB) associated BN- and PNB-PCa detection rate. Furthermore, we assessed the ISUP-grade variability between biopsy cores and the WMPR. Results According to BN (n = 499) vs. PNB (n = 314) patients, clinically significant (cs) PCa was detected more frequently by the TB/SB approach (62 vs. 43%) than with the TB (54 vs. 34%) or SB (57 vs. 34%) (all p < 0.0001) alone. Furthermore, we observed that the TB/SB strategy detects a significantly higher number of csPCa within PI-RADS 3, 4 or 5 reports, both in BN and PNB men. In contrast, applied biopsy techniques were equally effective to detect csPCa within PI-RADS 2 lesions. In case of csPCa diagnosis the TB approach was more often false-negative in PNB patients (BN 11% vs. PNB 19%; p = 0.02). The TB/SB technique showed in general significantly less upgrading, whereas a higher agreement was only observed for the total and BN patient cohort. Conclusion Despite csPCa is more frequently found in BN patients, the TB/SB method always detected a significantly higher number of csPCa within PI-RADS 3, 4 or 5 reports of our BN and PNB group. The TB/SB strategy predicts the ISUP-grade best in the total and BN cohort and in general shows the lowest upgrading rates, emphasizing its value not only in BN but also PNB patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hanna Zurl
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Mark Geyer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Jasminka Igrec
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerald Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Jörg Elstner
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Johannes Schmid
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alfred Triebl
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Viktoria Trimmel
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Clemens Reiter
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jakob Steiner
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Georg P. Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin Pichler
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jakob Riedl
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Jakob Strobl
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Georg C. Hutterer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria,Correspondence: Georg C. Hutterer
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karl Pummer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Augustin
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Emina Talakic
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Stolzenbach LF, Deuker M, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Abdollah F, Suardi N, Mirone V, Graefen M, Chun FK, Saad F, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Improving the stratification of intermediate risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:590-598. [PMID: 33887893 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04314-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) may exhibit a wide array of phenotypes, from favorable to unfavorable. NCCN criteria help distinguishing between favorable versus unfavorable subgroups. We studied and attempted to improve this classification. METHODS Within the SEER database 2010-2016, we identified 19,193 IR PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting unfavorable IR PCa was developed and externally validated, in addition to a head-to-head comparison with NCCN IR PCa stratification. RESULTS Model development (development cohort N.=13,436: 3585 unfavorable versus 9851 favorable) rested on age, PSA, clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) and percentage of positive cores. All were independent predictors of unfavorable IR PCa. In external validation cohort (N.=5757: 1652 unfavorable versus 4105 favorable), NCCN stratification was 61.8% accurate in discriminating between favorable versus unfavorable, compared to 67.6% for nomogram, which exhibited excellent calibration, less pronounced departures from ideal prediction and greater net-benefit in decision curve analyses (DCA) than NCCN stratification. The optimal nomogram cutoff misclassified 312 of 1976 patients (15.8%) versus 598 of 2877 (20.8%) for NCCN stratification. Of NCCN misclassified patients, 90.0% harbored pT3-4 stages versus 84.6% of nomogram. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed, externally validated nomogram discriminates better between favorable versus unfavorable IR PCa, according to overall accuracy, calibration, DCA, and actual numbers and stage distribution of misclassified patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Nocera
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada - .,Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy -
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lara F Stolzenbach
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marina Deuker
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics, and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Martino University Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix K Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barletta F, Stabile A, Mazzone E, Brembilla G, Sorce G, Pellegrino F, Scuderi S, Cannoletta D, Cirulli GO, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, De Cobelli F, Montorsi F, Briganti A. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:103.e17-103.e24. [PMID: 34688534 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed at optimizing the follow-up for patients with a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate (mpMRI) and a subsequent negative targeted biopsy (TBx) plus systematic biopsy (SBx). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 308 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa and a positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) with concomitant negative systematic and targeted Bx performed at a single tertiary referral center. All patients were then followed with serial PSA measurements, digital rectal examination and eventual follow-up mpMRI and/or repeat Bx. The primary outcome was to evaluate the overall clinically significant PCa (csPCa)-free survival. The secondary outcome was to assess the role of a repeat mpMRI (Fu-mpMRI) and PSA density as predictors of csPCa diagnosis (defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) during follow-up. Kaplan Meier analysis and univariable Cox regression were used for survival and predictive analyses. RESULTS Median follow-up was 31 months (IQR: 23-43). During the study period 116 (37.7%) and 68 (22.1%) of men received a Fu-mpMRI and a Fu-Bx, respectively. Overall, 51 (16.6%) and 15 (4.9%) patients had a positive mpMRI and clinically significant (csPCa) diagnosis during follow-up, respectively. Among 68 men who received a Fu-Bx, the 2- and 3-years csPCa diagnosis-free survival in men with negative vs. positive Fu-mpMRI was 97% vs. 65% and 92% vs. 65%, respectively. At univariate Cox-regression analysis the presence of a positive Fu-mpMRI resulted to be significantly associated with the presence of csPCa at Fu-Bx (HR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.3-26.6, P = 0.008). The 2- and 3-years csPCa diagnosis-free survival in men with PSAd <0.15 vs. ≥0.15 was 89% vs. 77%, and 86% vs. 66%, respectively (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 0.75-8.87, P = 0.13). The combination of negative Fu-mpMRI and PSAd<0.15 furtherly reduced the probability of csPCa diagnosis at Fu-Bx at only 6% at 3years (HR: 9.9, 95% CI: 1.9-38.6, P < 0.001) in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSIONS After a negative TBx for a positive mpMRI, more than half of Fu-mpMRI were negative. A persistent positive mpMRI was associated with a significant risk of csPCa. The risk of csPCa diagnosis in men with negative mpMRI performed after negative TBx and low PSAd was negligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Barletta
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Department of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The impact of race/ethnicity on upstaging and/or upgrading rates among intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2021; 40:103-110. [PMID: 34436637 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03816-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Race/ethnicity may predispose to less favorable prostate cancer characteristics in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) patients. We tested this hypothesis in a subgroup of IR PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results 2004-2016. The effect of race/ethnicity was tested in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses predicting upstaging (pT3+/pN1) and/or upgrading (Gleason Grade Group [GGG] 4-5) at RP. RESULTS Of 20,391 IR PCa patients, 15,050 (73.8%) were Caucasian, 2857 (14.0%) African-American, 1632 (8.0%) Hispanic/Latino and 852 (4.2%) Asian. Asian patients exhibited highest age (64 year), highest PSA (6.8 ng/ml) and highest rate of GGG3 (31.9%). African-Americans exhibited the highest percentage of positive cores at biopsy (41.7%) and the highest proportion of NCCN unfavorable risk group membership (54.6%). Conversely, Caucasians exhibited the highest proportion of cT2 stage (35.6%). In univariable analyses, Hispanic/Latinos exhibited the highest rates of upstaging/upgrading among all race/ethnicities, in both favorable and unfavorable groups, followed by Asians, Caucasians and African-Americans in that order. In multivariable analyses, Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity represented an independent predictor of higher upstaging and/or upgrading in favorable IR PCa (odds ratio [OR] 1.27, p < 0.01), while African-American race/ethnicity represented an independent predictor of lower upstaging and/or upgrading in unfavorable IR PCa (OR 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Race/ethnicity predisposes to differences in clinical, as well as in pathological characteristics in IR PCa patients. Specifically, even after full statistical adjustment, Hispanic/Latinos are at higher and African-Americans are at lower risk of upstaging and/or upgrading.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bravi CA, Droghetti M, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Mazzone E, Cucchiara V, Scuderi S, Barletta F, Schiavina R, Osmonov D, Juenemann KP, Boeri L, Karnes RJ, Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Stief C, Hiester A, Nini A, Albers P, Devos G, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Grubmüller B, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Tilki D, Graefen M, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Definition and Impact on Oncologic Outcomes of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-only Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Multimodal Therapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:285-295. [PMID: 34176768 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal definition and prognostic significance of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for node-only recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the definition and clinical implications of persistently elevated PSA after sLND for node-only recurrent PCa after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study included 579 patients treated with sLND at 11 high-volume centers between 2000 and 2016. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We assessed the linear relationship between the first PSA after sLND and death from PCa. Different definitions of PSA persistence were included in a multivariable model predicting cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after surgery to identify the best cutoff value. We investigated the association between PSA persistence and oncologic outcomes using multivariable regression models. Moreover, the effect of early androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after sLND was tested according to PSA persistence status and estimated risk of CSM. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We found an inverse relationship between the first PSA after sLND and the probability of cancer-specific survival. PSA persistence defined as first postoperative PSA ≥0.3 ng/ml provided the best discrimination accuracy (C index 0.757). According to this cutoff, 331 patients (57%) experienced PSA persistence. The median follow-up for survivors was 48 mo (interquartile range 27-74). After adjusting for confounders, men with persistently elevated PSA had higher risk of clinical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61), overall mortality (HR 2.20), and CSM (HR 2.59; all p < 0.001) after sLND. Early ADT administration after sLND improved survival only for patients with PSA persistence after surgery (HR 0.49; p = 0.024). Similarly, when PSA persistence status was included in multivariable models accounting for pathologic features, early ADT use after sLND was beneficial only for patients with a predicted risk of CSM at 5 yr of >10%. CONCLUSIONS PSA persistence after sLND independently predicts adverse prognosis, with the best discrimination accuracy for CSM provided by a definition of PSA ≥ 0.3 ng/ml. We showed that when stratifying patients by final pathology results and PSA persistence status, early ADT use after sLND was beneficial only for patients with PSA persistence or with a calculated 5-yr risk of CSM of >10%, which could be useful as we await results from ongoing prospective trials. PATIENT SUMMARY We found that for patients with prostate cancer who had lymph nodes removed after their cancer recurred, persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels predict poorer prognosis. We showed that a PSA level of ≥0.3 ng/ml provides the best accuracy in identifying patients with worse prognosis. This may help to improve risk stratification after lymph node removal and allow physicians to optimize treatment strategies after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Klaus-Peter Juenemann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Foundation Ca Granda, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alessandro Nini
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst, Aalst, Belgium; Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoekstra RJ, Goossens WJH, Beulens A, van Herk H, Hoevenaars BM, de Baaij J, Somford DM, Sedelaar JPM, van Basten JPA, Vrijhof HJEJ. Reassessment of Prostate Biopsy Specimens for Patients Referred for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Rarely Influences Surgical Planning. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 28:36-42. [PMID: 34337523 PMCID: PMC8317876 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The minimum volume standard is 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures per hospital in the Netherlands, so patients have to be referred to high-volume surgical centers for RARP. During preoperative work-up, prostate biopsies taken elsewhere are reassessed, with upgrading or downgrading of the initial Gleason grade group a possible consequence. Objective To determine if prostate biopsy reassessment leads to adjustment of the surgical plan regarding a nerve-sparing approach and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during RARP. Design, setting, and participants For 125 men who were referred to the Prosper prostate center at Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital (CWH) in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, results for the initial assessment of prostate biopsy by a local uropathologist were compared to results for biopsy reassessment by dedicated uropathologists at CWH. Results and limitations The pathologists reached agreement in 80% of the cases. In cases for which there was disagreement (n = 25), biopsy revision involved upgrading of the initial grade group in 68% and downgrading in 32%. Biopsy reassessment led to a change in surgical plan in ten cases (8%). As a result of upgrading, ePLND was performed in three patients (2%). ePLND was omitted in one patient (1%) because of downgrading. For three patients (2%) a non–nerve-sparing procedure was planned after upgrading of the initial grade group. For four patients (3%), a unilateral nerve-sparing procedure was performed after downgrading. Conclusions This study shows that there is large interobserver agreement between uropathologists in the assessment of Gleason grade group in prostate biopsy specimens. Reassessment rarely leads to a change in surgical plan regarding the indication for a nerve-sparing approach and ePLND. Therefore, reassessment of prostate biopsy before radical prostatectomy can be omitted when the initial pathological assessment was performed by a dedicated uropathologist. Patient summary Reassessment of the initial prostate biopsy specimen for patients referred to a specialist center for robot-assisted removal of the prostate rarely influences surgical planning and can be omitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Hoekstra
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ward J H Goossens
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Beulens
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde van Herk
- Department of Pathology, PAMM Foundation Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Brigiet M Hoevenaars
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost de Baaij
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H J Eric J Vrijhof
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Prosper Prostate Clinic, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Martini A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Scarcella S, Robesti D, Barletta F, Cucchiara V, Mirone V, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 4:42-48. [PMID: 31411971 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on the risk of metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) is still debated. OBJECTIVE To identify PSM features associated with recurrence in a stage-by-stage analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 1757 PCa patients treated with RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Patients were stratified according to the presence of PSM and to margins characteristics in three groups: no versus favourable (single margin <3mm) versus unfavourable (≥3mm or multifocal margin) PSMs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Predictors of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CR) were assessed using semiparametric Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 285 (16%) patients had PSMs; 146 (51%) had a unifocal PSM, while 139 (49%) had a multifocal PSM. The median length of a PSM was 1mm. Overall, 120 (42%) versus 165 (58%) patients had favourable versus unfavourable PSMs. In patients with ≤pT3a and pathologic grade group ≤3 disease (n=1351), favourable (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-4.22) and unfavourable (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.49-4.84) PSMs significantly increased the risk of BCR (p<0.01). However, they were not associated with CR (all p>0.05). Conversely, in patients with pT3b/4 and/or pathologic grade group 4-5 and/or pN1 (n=406), only an unfavourable PSM was associated with both BCR (HR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.19-4.22) and CR (HR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.07-6.30; all p≤0.04). CONCLUSIONS Although the presence of PSMs was associated with an increased risk of BCR in all stages, only men with adverse pathologic characteristics and an unfavourable PSM were at an increased risk of experiencing metastases as compared with their counterparts with no or a single margin shorter than 3mm. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we defined a new category of unfavourable positive surgical margins (namely, ≥3mm and/or multifocal), which confers a higher risk of developing metastasis in men with more aggressive pathologic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Department of Urology, Università Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, Università Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|