1
|
Stranne J, Henry A, Oprea-Lager DE. Use of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Nodal Staging in Prostate Cancer and Tailoring of Treatment: A Continuing Conundrum. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02745-3. [PMID: 39701872 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
Trials have shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging of nodal status in prostate cancer. We discuss the advantages of PSMA PET/CT over current options for nodal staging and highlight the issues that need to be resolved for implementation of this modality in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann Henry
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scuderi S, Scilipoti P, Nocera L, Longoni M, Quarta L, Zaurito P, Barletta F, Pellegrino F, de Angelis M, Robesti D, Pellegrino A, Stabile A, Larcher A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. Perioperative outcomes, environmental impact and economic implications of pelvic drain discontinuation in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00776-2. [PMID: 39690076 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The utility of a pelvic drain (PD) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been recently questioned. We investigated the impact of discontinuing PD placement after RARP on complications, pain, environmental benefits, and cost savings. METHODS We identified 1,199 patients who underwent RARP with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2016 to 2023 at a referral center. Starting in 2018, PD placement was discontinued in uncomplicated RARPs. Complications were collected following the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations on reporting and grading. Multivariable logistic regression models (MLR) evaluated the impact of PD use on perioperative outcomes and opioid usage. The PD life cycle-associated Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Emissions (CO2e) and its economic impact were estimated. RESULTS A PD was placed in a total of 555 (46%) patients, with a decreasing rate from 94% to 18% between 2016 and 2023. The rates of any and high-grade (HG) complications were similar between patients with and without PD (29 vs. 28% and 5% vs. 6%, respectively; all P ≥ 0.2). At MLR, the PD placement was not associated with the risk of any (OR:1.09, 95%CI:0.79-1.5) or HG complications (OR 1.45, 95%CI 0.80-2.63). PD placement was associated with greater postoperative opioid usage (OR:1.58, 95%CI:1.01-2.51, P = 0.045). The CO2e spared rose from 220 in 2016 to 2,180 in 2022 and cost savings per year increased from 1,855€ in 2016 to 18,506€ in 2022. CONCLUSION Unnecessary PD placement should be avoided in uncomplicated RARPs to obtain environmental benefits, reduce health-related costs, and improve patients' outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zaurito
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madendere S, Kılıç M, Gürses B, Vural M, Armutlu A, Kulaç İ, Tarım K, Esen B, Aykanat İC, Veznikli M, Canda AE, Balbay D, Baydar DE, Kordan Y, Esen T. Can the Briganti 2019 nomogram be modified to predict lymph node metastasis risk in patients with prostate cancer detected with in-bore biopsy? Int J Urol 2024; 31:1269-1277. [PMID: 39140238 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to modify the Briganti 2019 nomogram and to test whether it is valid for patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer through in-bore prostate biopsies. METHODS Data for 204 patients with positive multiparametric prostate MRI and prostate cancer identified either by mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion or in-bore biopsy and who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The Briganti 2019 nomogram was applied to the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group (142 patients) in the original form, and then, two modifications were tested for the targeted component. Original and modified scores were compared. These modifications were adapted for the in-bore biopsy group (62 patients). The final histopathologic stage was regarded as the gold standard. RESULTS Nodal metastases were identified in 18/142 (12.6%) of mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy patients and 8/62 (12.9%) of the in-bore biopsy patients. In the mpMRI-cognitive/software fusion biopsy group, tumor size/core size (%) of targeted biopsy cores and positive core percentage on systematic biopsy were significant parameters for lymph node metastasis based on univariate logistic regression analyses (p < 0.05). With the modifications of these parameters for the in-bore biopsy group, V1 modification of the Briganti 2019 nomogram provided 100% sensitivity and 31.5% specificity (AUC:0.627), while V2 modification provided 75% sensitivity and 46.3% specificity (AUC:0.645). CONCLUSIONS Briganti 2019 nomogram may be modified by utilizing tumor size/core size (%) for targeted biopsy cores instead of positive core percentage on systematic biopsy or by not taking both parameters into consideration to detect node metastasis risk of patients diagnosed with in-bore biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mert Kılıç
- Department of Urology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bengi Gürses
- Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Metin Vural
- Department of Radiology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Armutlu
- Department of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - İbrahim Kulaç
- Department of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kayhan Tarım
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Barış Esen
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Mert Veznikli
- Department of Biostatistics, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Erdem Canda
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- RMK AIMES, Rahmi M. Koç Academy of Interventional Medicine, Education and Simulation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Derya Balbay
- Department of Urology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dilek Ertoy Baydar
- Department of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yakup Kordan
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tarık Esen
- Department of Urology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Macek P, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Cathelineau X. Re: Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool. Eur Urol 2024; 86:478-479. [PMID: 38876915 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Özman O, Veerman H, Contieri R, Droghetti M, Donswijk ML, Hagens MJ, Van Leeuwen PJ, Vis AN, van der Poel HG. Staging Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Strongly Depends on Lymph Node Tumor Burden. J Clin Med 2024; 13:6534. [PMID: 39518673 PMCID: PMC11547063 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the factors affecting the lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and to evaluate its prognostic value for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Patients who had intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer and underwent robot-assisted (RA)RP between 2017 and 2021 were included. Initial lymph node staging was carried out using PSMA PET/CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. A cut-off value for LNM tumor deposit size that maximizes specificity was investigated and a post hoc specificity analysis was carried out. In survival analysis for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) after RP, Kaplan-Meier curves of molecular imaging (mi)N0 and miN1 patients were compared using the log-rank test and separate Cox regression models were developed to reveal the significance of PSMA PET/CT staging in pre- and post-surgery settings. Results: In 583 patients with a prevalence of pathology-proven LNM of 27.4%, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PSMA PET/CT per patient were 26.3% [95%CI 18.9-35.5], 93.9% [95%CI 84.9-100], 61.8% [95%CI 44.5-83.5], and 77.1% [95%CI 69.7-85.1], respectively. PSMA PET/CT showed a better sensitivity as LNM tumor deposit size increased (p = 0.003 OR 2.4 [95%CI 1.3-4.4]) and a better specificity in pT3-4 tumors (96.1%) versus pT2 (91.1%, p = 0.024 OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.1-6.3]). After adjustment according to 5.5 mm LNM tumor deposit size, which showed the best discriminative performance (AUC: 0.905 [95%CI 0.804-1.000, p < 0.001]), overall sensitivity tripled (90.2%, p < 0.001). The 1-year bPFS was 56.0% and 83.3% for miN1 and miN0 patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Whereas miN0pN1 was not, miN1pN1 disease was independently associated with decreased bPFS (HR:2.1 95%CI 1.3-3.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT has a lymph node tumor burden-dependent and cohort-driven diagnostic ability but consequently a strong independent prognostic value for predicting biochemical recurrence after RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oktay Özman
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
| | - Hans Veerman
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Marinus J. Hagens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. Van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.V.); (M.J.H.); (P.J.V.L.); (A.N.V.); (H.G.v.d.P.)
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reitano G, Ceccato T, Botti S, Bruniera M, Carrozza S, Bovolenta E, Randazzo G, Minardi D, Ruggera L, Gardi M, Novara G, Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. Treatment and Staging Intensification Strategies Associated with Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Evaluation and Exploration of Novel Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2465. [PMID: 39001527 PMCID: PMC11240638 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) presents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating treatment intensification due to the potential presence of micrometastases. While radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes one of the primary treatment modalities, the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies suggests a paradigm shift towards more aggressive treatment strategies, also guided by new imaging modalities like positron emission tomography using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET). Despite the benefits, treatment intensification raises concerns regarding increased side effects. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on perioperative treatment intensification and de-escalation for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa patients eligible for surgery. Through a non-systematic literature review conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, we explored various dimensions of perioperative treatments, including neoadjuvant systemic therapies, adjuvant therapies, and the role of novel diagnostic technologies. Emerging evidence provides more support for neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Preliminary results from studies suggest the potential for treatments traditionally reserved for metastatic PCa to show apparent benefit in a non-metastatic setting. The role of adjuvant treatments remains debated, particularly the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at higher risk of biochemical recurrence. The potential role of radio-guided PSMA lymph node dissection emerges as a cutting-edge approach, offering a targeted method for eradicating disease with greater precision. Innovations such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are potential game-changers, offering new avenues for personalized treatment and improved prognostication. The intensification of surgical treatment in high-risk PCa patients is a dynamic and evolving field, underscored by the integration of traditional and novel therapeutic approaches. As evidence continues to emerge, these strategies will refine patient selection, enhance treatment efficacy, and mitigate the risk of progression, although with an attentive consideration of the associated side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Reitano
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Tommaso Ceccato
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Simone Botti
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Bruniera
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Salvatore Carrozza
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bovolenta
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Randazzo
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Minardi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ruggera
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Mario Gardi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Giacomo Novara
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evangelista L, Zattoni F, Burei M, Bertin D, Borsatti E, Baresic T, Farsad M, Trenti E, Bartolomei M, Panareo S, Urso L, Trifirò G, Brugola E, Chierichetti F, Donner D, Setti L, Gallan M, Del Bianco P, Magni G, De Salvo GL, Novara G. A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study on the Impact of [ 18F]F-Choline PET/CT Versus Conventional Imaging for Staging Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1013-1020. [PMID: 38844361 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of [18F]F-choline PET/CT with conventional imaging for staging and managing intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The primary objective was to assess the ability of PET/CT with [18F]F-choline to identify lymph node and systemic involvement during initial staging. Secondary objectives included evaluating the impact of [18F]F-choline PET/CT on unnecessary local treatments and assessing the safety of [18F]F-choline agents. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze recurrence-free survival and overall survival 5 y after randomization. Methods: A prospective controlled, open, randomized multicenter phase III trial involving 7 Italian centers was conducted. Eligible patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Two groups were formed: one undergoing conventional imaging (abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced CT and bone scanning) and the other receiving conventional imaging plus [18F]F-choline PET/CT. The study was terminated prematurely; however, all the endpoints were thoroughly analyzed and enriched. Results: Between February 2016 and December 2020, 256 patients were randomly assigned. In total, 236 patients (117 in the control arm and 119 in the experimental arm) were considered for the final assessment. In the experimental arm, the sensitivity for lymph node metastases, determined by final pathology and serial prostate-specific antigen evaluations, was higher than in the control arm (77.78% vs. 28.57% and 65.62% vs. 17.65%, respectively). The [18F]F-choline was tolerated well. The use of [18F]F-choline PET/CT resulted in an approximately 8% reduction in unnecessary extended lymphadenectomy compared with contrast-enhanced CT. Additionally, [18F]F-choline PET/CT had a marginal impact on 5-y overall survival, contributing to a 4% increase in survival rates. Conclusion: In the initial staging of PCa, [18F]F-choline PET/CT exhibited diagnostic performance superior to that of conventional imaging for detecting metastases. [18F]F-choline PET/CT reduced the rate of unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy by up to 8%. These findings support the consideration of discontinuing conventional imaging for staging PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Department of Medicine, DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marta Burei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniele Bertin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
| | - Eugenio Borsatti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Tanja Baresic
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Mohsen Farsad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bozen, Italy
| | - Emanuela Trenti
- Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bozen, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Panareo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Urso
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | | | - Franca Chierichetti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, APSS della Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Davide Donner
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, APSS della Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lucia Setti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Mauro Gallan
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Dell'Angelo Hospital, Mestre-Venezia, Italy; and
| | - Paola Del Bianco
- Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanna Magni
- Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Novara
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu J, Yang X, Xiong Z, Xie X, Hong Y, Liu W. Analysis of biopsy pathology and risk factors of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:2261-2267. [PMID: 38393409 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03931-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between biopsy pathology and lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), and to identify risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were respective screened between Jan 2015 and May 2022. Patients diagnosed PCa via 13-core ultrasound-guided biopsies and underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection were identified. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. Relationships between LNM and non-LNM were analyzed using chi-square and independent samples t-test. Logistic regression model was fitted to analyze the risk factors of lymph node metastases. RESULTS Two hundreds and fifteen patients were included, sixty-seven patients had lymph node metastasis. Gleason scores in LNM group were higher than that in non-LNM group (8.5 ± 0.9 VS 7.5 ± 1.5, p < 0.001), positive biopsy in non-LNM group was significantly lower than that in LNM group (p < 0.001), Binary logistic regression analysis indicated number of positive biopsy and number of removed lymph nodes increased the risks of LNM (odds ratio, OR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.16-1.42, p < 0.001; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17, p < 0.001; respectively). Number of positive biopsy in internal gland but not external gland was significant associated with LNM (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.34-2.06, p < 0.001; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.88-1.61, p = 0.262; respectively). The patients with lymph nodes dissection more than 13 were about four times more likely to detect lymph node metastasis than those fewer than 13 (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.10-7.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The risk of lymph node metastasis increased with the number of positive prostate biopsy cores, and tumors in the internal gland were more likely to cause lymph node metastasis. In addition, lymph node metastasis was more likely to be found when the number of lymph nodes dissection was greater than 13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieping Hu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
| | - Xiaorong Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhufeng Xiong
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xun Xie
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yanyan Hong
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Weipeng Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Myers AA, Briganti A, Leibovich B, Lerner SP, Moschini M, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Spiess PE, Stenzl A, Taneja SS, Touijer KA, Kamat AM. Contemporary Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Genitourinary Cancers: Where Are We in 2023? Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:412-420. [PMID: 37980250 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymphadenectomy during surgery for genitourinary malignancies has varying benefits. OBJECTIVE To review contemporary evidence on lymph node dissection in genitourinary cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a collaborative review to summarize current evidence supporting lymph node dissection in urothelial, prostate, kidney, penile, and testis cancers. We present the evidence on patient selection and recommended dissection templates, and highlight knowledge gaps and ongoing areas of investigation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Lymph node dissection remains the reference standard for lymph node staging. Pathologic nodal stage informs prognosis and guides adjuvant treatment. Appropriate template and patient selection are paramount to optimize outcomes and capitalize on the selective therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSIONS Accurate staging with lymphadenectomy is contingent on appropriate template selection. The cumulative benefit will depend on judicious patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in urology. We reviewed current evidence on lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda A Myers
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Seth P Lerner
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology and Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Keles A, Kose M, Somun UF, Culpan M, Yaksi N, Yıldırım A. Impact of health and digital health literacy on quality of life following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: prospective single-center cohort study. World J Urol 2024; 42:241. [PMID: 38632212 PMCID: PMC11024042 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The importance of health literacy (HL) and digital health literacy (e-HL) in promoting healthy behavior and informed decision making is becoming increasingly apparent. This study aimed to assess the effects of HL and e-HL on the quality of life (QoL) of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective observational study included 104 patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer. HL and e-HL were evaluated using the validated eHealth Literacy Scale and European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire Short Form before RP. We evaluated patients' physical, psychological, social, and global QoL using the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 8 weeks after RP. The exclusion criterion was any difficulties in language and comprehension. We employed one-way ANOVA to compare continuous variables across groups in univariate analysis and used MANOVA for exploring relationships among multiple continuous variables and groups in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS Multivariate analyses showed that poorer e-HL and HL were associated with being older (p = 0.019), having less education (p < 0.001), and not having access to the internet (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between improved e-HL (p = 0.043) and HL (p = 0.023), better global health status, and higher emotional functioning (p = 0.011). However, the symptom scales did not differ significantly between the e-HL and HL groups. CONCLUSION Our study showed a positive association between self-reported HL/e-HL and QoL, marking the first report on the impact of HL/e-HL on the QoL in men who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Keles
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Muhammed Kose
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Umit Furkan Somun
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meftun Culpan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nese Yaksi
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Amasya, Amasya, Turkey
| | - Asıf Yıldırım
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sorce G, Mottrie A. Re: Unilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study that Challenges the Dogma. Eur Urol 2024; 85:302. [PMID: 37845100 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Sorce
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajwa P, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Schmidt M, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. The diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in primary staging of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:74-78. [PMID: 37750292 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a recommended imaging modality for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Its routine implementation before radical prostatectomy (RP) may allow avoiding undertreatment. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for pelvic lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for high-risk PCa. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional database of patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT before RP and ePLND for high-risk PCa. The diagnostic estimates of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lymph node involvement were calculated. RESULTS We included 165 high-risk PCa patients. The median PSA value was 24.5 ng/mL (range: 6.7-185) and all the patients had biopsy Grade Group 4-5. In total, 46 (28%) of patients had clinical lymph node involvement at 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. A mean number of resected lymph nodes per patient was 22 (range: 15-45) and 149 (4.2%) of all resected nodes were positive for lymph node metastasis at final pathology. The diagnostic estimates for the detection of pN+ disease at RP were as follows: sensitivity 63% (95% CI: 51-75), specificity 97% (95% CI: 91-99), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI: 82-99), and negative predictive value 79% (95% CI: 70-86). The total accuracy of PSMA-PET was 83% (95% CI: 76-88). CONCLUSION Our analyses support high specificity and positive predictive value of pretreatment 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients treated with RP for high-risk PCa. While a positive finding should be considered as robust indicator for clinical decision-making, a negative result cannot reliably rule out the presence of lymph node involvement in high-risk PCa; there is a need for advanced risk stratification in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Julian Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Schmidt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Karakiewicz PI, Incesu RB, Scheipner L, Graefen M. Navigating Nomograms To Identify Prostate Cancer Patients for Lymph Node Dissection. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:564-565. [PMID: 37541904 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|