1
|
Levy S, Péricart S, Bajeot AS, Fakhfakh S, Lesourd M, Soulié M, Pignot G, Roumiguié M. Do we need a re-TUR after en bloc resection of T1 stage bladder cancer? World J Urol 2024; 42:475. [PMID: 39115589 PMCID: PMC11310258 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05175-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A second look trans-urethral resection of the bladder (re-TUR) is recommended after the diagnosis of T1 high grade (T1HG) bladder cancer. Few studies have evaluated the results of re-TUR after a first en bloc resection (EBR) and none of them have specifically reported the pathological results on the field of previous T1 disease. OBJECTIVE To report the rate of upstaging and the rate of residual disease (RD) on the field of T1HG lesions resected with EBR. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 01/2014 and 06/2022, patients from 2 centers who had a re-TUR after an EBR for T1HG urothelial carcinoma were retrospectively included. Primary endpoint was the rate of RD including the rate of upstaging to T2 disease on the scar of the primary resection. Secondary endpoints were the rate of any residual disease outside the field. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were included. No muscle invasive bladder cancer lesions were found after re-TUR. Among the 16 patients who had a RD, 4 were on the resection scar. All of these lesions were papillary and high grade. RD outside the field of the first EBR was observed in 12 patients. CONCLUSION After EBR of T1HG disease, none of our patients had an upstaging to MIBC. However, the rate of RD either on and outside the field of the EBR remains quite significant. We suggested that predictive factors of residual papillary disease (number of tumors at the initial TUR and concomitant CIS) might be suitable to select patient who will benefit of the re-TUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Levy
- Department of Urology, CHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 Av Jean Poulhès, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Sarah Péricart
- Department of Pathology, CHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Department of Urology, CHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 Av Jean Poulhès, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Sami Fakhfakh
- Department of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Lesourd
- Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix du Sud, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Michel Soulié
- Department of Urology, CHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 Av Jean Poulhès, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Géraldine Pignot
- Department of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, CHU-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, 1 Av Jean Poulhès, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lombardo R, Riolo S, De Nunzio C. Re: David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Rodolfo Hurle, et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:508-515. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:965-966. [PMID: 37872030 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Riolo
- Department of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuen-Chun Teoh J, Cheng CH, Tsang CF, Kai-Man Li J, Kwun-Chung Cheng B, Hoi-Chak Chan W, Kwun-Wai Chan W, Churk-Fai Li T, Chiu Y, Law MC, Lok-Hei Leung C, Sze-Ho Ho B, Yue-Kit Lee C, Cheong-Kin Chan R, Shu-Yin Chan E, Chan MTY, Hok-Leung Tsu J, Tam HM, Lam KM, So HS, Cho CL, Ng CM, Chan CK, Liu PL, Wing-Hong Chu R, Tsui-Lin Ng A, Chu SK, Yee CH, Yiu MK, Lo KL, Au WH, Ma WK, Ka-Fung Chiu P, Sze-Wan Kwok H, Yip SY, Leung CH, Ng CF. Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 86:103-111. [PMID: 38692956 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Conventionally, standard resection (SR) is performed by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. En bloc resection of the bladder tumour (ERBT) has been proposed as an alternative technique in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The objective of this study is to investigate whether ERBT could improve the 1-yr recurrence rate of NMIBC, as compared with SR. METHODS A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted in Hong Kong. Adults with bladder tumour(s) of ≤ 3cm were enrolled from April 2017 to December 2020, and followed up until 1 yr after surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERBT or SR in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was 1-yr recurrence rate. A modified intention-to-treat analysis on patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC was performed. The main secondary outcomes included detrusor muscle sampling rate, operative time, hospital stay, 30-d complications, any residual or upstaging of disease upon second-look transurethral resection, and 1-yr progression rate. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 350 patients underwent randomisation, and 276 patients were histologically confirmed to have NMIBC. At 1 yr, 31 patients in the ERBT group and 46 in the SR group developed recurrence; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1- yr recurrence rates were 29% (95% confidence interval, 18-37) in the ERBT group and 38% (95% confidence interval, 28-46) in the SR group (p = 0.007). Upon a subgroup analysis, patients with 1-3 cm tumour, single tumour, Ta disease, or intermediate-risk NMIBC had a significant benefit from ERBT. None of the patients in the ERBT group and three patients in the SR group developed progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-yr progression rates were 0% in the ERBT group and 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0-5.5) in the SR group (p = 0.065). The median operative time was 28 min (interquartile range, 20-45) in the ERBT group and 22 min (interquartile range, 15-30) in the SR group (p < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In patients with NMIBC of ≤ 3cm, ERBT resulted in a significant reduction in the 1-yr recurrence rate when compared with SR. The study results support ERBT as the first-line surgical treatment for patients with bladder tumours of≤ 3cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
| | - Cheung-Hing Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chiu-Fung Tsang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joseph Kai-Man Li
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Bryan Kwun-Chung Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wilson Hoi-Chak Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wayne Kwun-Wai Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Trevor Churk-Fai Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Yi Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Man-Chung Law
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong
| | - Clarence Lok-Hei Leung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Brian Sze-Ho Ho
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chris Yue-Kit Lee
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Ronald Cheong-Kin Chan
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Eddie Shu-Yin Chan
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Marco Tsz-Yeung Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - James Hok-Leung Tsu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ho-Man Tam
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Kin-Man Lam
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Hing-Shing So
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chak-Lam Cho
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chi-Man Ng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chun-Ki Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Pak-Ling Liu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong
| | - Ringo Wing-Hong Chu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Ada Tsui-Lin Ng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sau-Kwan Chu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chi-Hang Yee
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Ming-Kwong Yiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ka-Lun Lo
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wing-Hang Au
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Wai-Kit Ma
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Hilda Sze-Wan Kwok
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Siu-Ying Yip
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chi-Ho Leung
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Babjuk M. Can an En Bloc Technique Improve Outcomes of Endoscopic Surgery for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer? Eur Urol 2024; 86:112-113. [PMID: 38797600 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Régnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Compérat E, Shariat SF. Reply to Riccardo Lombardo, Sara Riolo, and Cosimo De Nunzio's Letter to the Editor re: David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Rodolfo Hurle, et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:508-515. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:967-968. [PMID: 37865570 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Kotov
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sophie Régnier
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsius Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chao Cai
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nicola Frego
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mark Taraktin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shkolyar E, Zhou SR, Carlson CJ, Chang S, Laurie MA, Xing L, Bowden AK, Liao JC. Optimizing cystoscopy and TURBT: enhanced imaging and artificial intelligence. Nat Rev Urol 2024:10.1038/s41585-024-00904-9. [PMID: 38982304 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00904-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Diagnostic cystoscopy in combination with transurethral resection of the bladder tumour are the standard for the diagnosis, surgical treatment and surveillance of bladder cancer. The ability to inspect the bladder in its current form stems from a long chain of advances in imaging science and endoscopy. Despite these advances, bladder cancer recurrence and progression rates remain high after endoscopic resection. This stagnation is a result of the heterogeneity of cancer biology as well as limitations in surgical techniques and tools, as incomplete resection and provider-specific differences affect cancer persistence and early recurrence. An unmet clinical need remains for solutions that can improve tumour delineation and resection. Translational advances in enhanced cystoscopy technologies and artificial intelligence offer promising avenues to overcoming the progress plateau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Shkolyar
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Steve R Zhou
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Camella J Carlson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shuang Chang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mark A Laurie
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Audrey K Bowden
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Joseph C Liao
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurabayashi A, Fukuhara H, Furihata K, Iwashita W, Furihata M, Inoue K. Photodynamic Diagnosis and Therapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2299. [PMID: 39001362 PMCID: PMC11240600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) possesses distinct molecular profiles that influence progression depending on its biological nature and delivered treatment intensity. Muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) and non-MIBC (NMIBC) demonstrate great intrinsic heterogeneity regarding different prognoses, survival, progression, and treatment outcomes. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the standard of care in treating NMIBC and serves both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes despite the prevalent recurrence and progression among many patients. In particular, flat urothelial carcinoma in situ and urothelial carcinoma with lamina propria invasion are the major precursors of MIBC. A new-generation photosensitizer, 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), demonstrates high tumor specificity by illuminating the tumor lesion with a specific wavelength of light to produce fluorescence and has been studied for photodynamic diagnosis to detect precise tumor areas by TURBT. Additionally, it has been applied for treatment by producing its cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, as well as screening for urological carcinomas by excreting porphyrin in the blood and urine. Moreover, 5-ALA may contribute to screening before and after TURBT in NMIBC. Here, we summarize the updated evidence and ongoing research on photodynamic technology for NMIBC, providing insight into the potential for improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Kurabayashi
- Department of Pathology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Hideo Fukuhara
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Kaoru Furihata
- Department of Pathology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Waka Iwashita
- Department of Pathology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Mutsuo Furihata
- Department of Pathology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| | - Keiji Inoue
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku 783-8505, Kochi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahrendt H, Sun H, Mishra K, Gupta S, Bukavina L. Multidisciplinary management of sexual and gender minorities with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00496-4. [PMID: 38880704 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Bladder cancer, a common urologic malignancy, has poor morbidity and mortality in sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals, stemming from higher risk, poor access to care and lack of quality cancer care. To begin addressing this disparity, this review offers key considerations for evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of SGM individuals with bladder cancer. In addition to thorough medical and surgical history, initial evaluation should include discussion of patient goals for sexual function and organ preservation, as well as an evaluation of sexual function. Prior gender affirming surgery and patient specific sexual function goals will impact diagnosis and treatment approaches, including surgical and radiation therapy. Throughout care for SGM individuals with bladder cancer, it is critical to acknowledge the systemic discrimination that may be experienced by these individuals and approach conversations with sensitivity and humility and incorporate mental and social support as appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Ahrendt
- Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Helen Sun
- Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kirtishri Mishra
- Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shubham Gupta
- Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
| | - Laura Bukavina
- Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Montorsi F, Rosiello G, Gandaglia G, Salonia A, Briganti A. Re: David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Rodolfo Hurle, et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.010. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:636. [PMID: 37951819 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Herrmann J, Hartung FO, Kriegmair MC, Becker B, Lusuardi L, Herrmann TRW, Netsch C. [Should we all switch to en-bloc resection of bladder tumours?]. Aktuelle Urol 2024; 55:250-254. [PMID: 38653465 DOI: 10.1055/a-2252-0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
In En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours (ERBT), tumours are not removed in fragments, but are dissected in one layer and, if possible, extracted in one piece. This method represents a significant shift in the surgical management of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumours, providing multiple benefits over the traditional transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR-B). The histological analysis of ERBT specimens is more accurate, enhancing diagnostic precision. Additionally, the presence of detrusor muscle in ERBT specimens is more frequent, indicating a more complete removal of the tumours. Recent years have seen the consolidation of a robust evidence base emphasizing the advantages of ERBT. Notably, a multicentric, prospective randomized trial has recently revealed a significant reduction in recurrence rates at 12 months follow-up compared with TUR-B. Experienced endourologists should explore this technique, as it may soon become the standard of care. The technique's elegance and effectiveness make it too important to be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Herrmann
- Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Benedikt Becker
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Urologie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Régnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Compérat E, Shariat SF. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giuseppe Rosiello, Giorgio Gandaglia, Andrea Salonia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Rodolfo Hurle, et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2023;6:508-15. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:639-640. [PMID: 37978025 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Kotov
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sophie Régnier
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsius Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chao Cai
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nicola Frego
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mark Taraktin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ortner G, Güven S, Somani BK, Nicklas A, Teoh JYC, Goumas IK, Bach T, Sancha FG, Figueredo FCA, Kramer MW, Bozzini G, Ulvik Ø, Kallidonis P, Roche JB, Miernik A, Enikeev D, Vaddi CM, Bhojani N, Sountoulides P, Lusuardi L, Baard J, Gauhar V, Ahmed A, Netsch C, Gözen AS, Nagele U, Herrmann TRW, Tokas T. Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of bladder cancer: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group. World J Urol 2024; 42:79. [PMID: 38353743 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04786-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify laser settings and limits applied by experts during laser vaporization (vapBT) and laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications. METHODS After a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, we conducted a survey (57 questions) which was sent to laser experts. The expert selection was based on clinical experience and scientific contribution. Participants were asked for used laser types, typical laser settings during specific scenarios, and preventive measures applied during surgery. Settings for a maximum of 2 different lasers for each scenario were possible. Responses and settings were compared among the reported laser types. RESULTS Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited experts completed the survey. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is the most common laser (57%), followed by Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (48%), continuous wave (cw) Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (26%), and pulsed Tm:YAG (13%). Experts prefer ERBT (91.3%) to vapBT (8.7%); however, relevant limitations such as tumor size, number, and anatomical tumor location exist. Laser settings were generally comparable; however, we could find significant differences between the laser sources for lateral wall ERBT (p = 0.028) and standard ERBT (p = 0.033), with cwTm:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG being operated in higher power modes when compared to TFL and Ho:YAG. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG and short pulse modes for TFL lasers. CONCLUSION TFL seems to have replaced Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG. Most laser settings do not differ significantly among laser sources. For experts, continuous flow irrigation is the most commonly applied measure to reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gernot Ortner
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Selcuk Güven
- Department of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andre Nicklas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Thorsten Bach
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Westklinikum Rissen, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Mario W Kramer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (Campus Lübeck), Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landstainer Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Naeem Bhojani
- Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Petros Sountoulides
- 1st Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Departement of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ali Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Frimley Health, NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK
| | | | - Ali Serdar Gözen
- Department of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Udo Nagele
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Thomas R W Herrmann
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Department of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dyrskjøt L, Hansel DE, Efstathiou JA, Knowles MA, Galsky MD, Teoh J, Theodorescu D. Bladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023; 9:58. [PMID: 37884563 PMCID: PMC11218610 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-023-00468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret A Knowles
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dan Theodorescu
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Herrmann TRW. En bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) revisited 12 years after reintroduction: too good to be further ignored. World J Urol 2023; 41:2577-2582. [PMID: 37819587 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04629-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
En bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) orginally described in 1980 and adopted by few centers in the late 1990s has regained attention in the 2010s as a renaissance of a technique with high potential. The advent of new lasers indirectly lead to a better understanding of anatomical dissection from the experience in anatomical dissection in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. 12 years after the reintroduction of ERBT evidence mounts that it is not only equivalent but better in some regards. However, ERBT still falls short with regard to wide adoption despite the striking technique inherent and reproducible features of accurate staging and specimen quality as requested by pathologist, as well and despite the high intraoperative safety and fast adoption of this technique even in early phase of training. The editorial walks the reader through the timeline of the renaissance speculating why there is a blockage between cognitive understanding and dissonance in surgical practice. The special issues presents the meta-analysis of surgical and oncological data on one hand and the level of understanding and power of this surgical technique in fields offsite oncological results in training achieving results almost right from the start after adoptation. Unlike in earlier years reviewing the literature of ERBT in 2023, ERBT seems not only to be a viable alternative, but something one should turn towards no to underperform with regards to the endpoints achievable by ERBT in a critical disease like bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R W Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Pfaffenholzstrasse 4, CH 8501, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape, South Africa.
- Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|