The longitudinal trajectory of emotional cognition in subgroups of recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder

Neural subgroups in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder during emotion regulation

BACKGROUND

Impaired emotion regulation has been proposed as a putative endophenotype in bipolar disorder (BD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating this in unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) have thus far yielded incongruent findings. Hence, the current paper examines neural subgroups among UR during emotion regulation.

METHODS

71 UR of patients with BD and 66 healthy controls (HC) underwent fMRI scanning while performing an emotion regulation task. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on extracted signal change during emotion down-regulation in pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs). Identified subgroups were compared on neural activation, demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables.

RESULTS

Two subgroups of UR were identified: subgroup 1 (39 UR; 55%) was characterized by hypo-activity in the dorsolateral, dorsomedial, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the bilateral amygdalae, but comparable activation to HC in the other ROIs; subgroup 2 (32 UR; 45%) was characterized by hyperactivity in all ROIs. Subgroup 1 had lower success in emotion regulation compared to HC and reported more childhood trauma compared to subgroup 2 and HC. Subgroup 2 reported more anxiety, lower functioning, and greater attentional vigilance toward fearful faces compared to HC. Relatives from both subgroups were poorer in recognizing positive faces compared to HC.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings may explain the discrepancy in earlier fMRI studies on emotion regulation in UR, showing two different subgroups of UR that both exhibited aberrant neural activity during emotion regulation, but in opposite directions. Furthermore, the results suggest that impaired recognition of positive facial expressions is a broad endophenotype of BD.

Social cognition in bipolar I and II disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in reports upon social-cognition impairments in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of social cognition domains in bipolar I (BD I) and II (BD II) based on the findings to date.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on Web of Science and PubMed from inception to 28 August 2024. Studies with all-age-group of ICD-10, DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, or DSM-5 defined BD (I or II) either in a remitted or symptomatic state were included. The risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the quality of the sources was evaluated using GRADE criteria. Results of the studies were measured by synthesizing Hedge's g effect sizes through a random effects meta-analytic approach.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included, covering three core domains of social cognition (theory of mind (ToM), emotion processing and attributions). There was no significant difference in ToM between BD I and BD II and in emotion processing between non-psychotic patients with BD I and BD II, and history of psychosis negatively predicted performance on emotion processing. Furthermore, BD II performed worse than BD I in attributions, with a low to moderate summary effect size.

CONCLUSIONS

BD I and BD II performed similarly on ToM and emotional processing, but BD II had more impaired attributions. Future studies are encouraged to control for the influence of clinical features, to use more neuroscientific techniques, and to explore on other domains of social cognition in bipolar subtypes.

Emotional intelligence and neurocognition profiles in first-episode psychosis: A two-year follow-up study

Emotional intelligence (EI) and neurocognition (NC) impairments are common in first-episode psychosis (FEP), yet their evolution over time remains unclear. This study identified patient profiles in EI and NC performance in FEP. 98 adult FEP patients and 128 healthy controls (HCs) were tested on clinical, functional, EI, and NC variables at baseline and two-year follow-up (FUP). A repeated-measures ANOVA compared the effects of group (patients and HCs) and time on EI. Significant EI improvements were observed in both groups. Four groups were created based on NC and EI performance at baseline and FUP in patients: impairment in NC and EI, impairment in NC only, impairment in EI only, and no impairment. At FUP, patients impaired in NC and EI showed less cognitive reserve (CR), greater negative and positive symptoms, and poorer functional outcomes. At FUP, three group trajectories were identified: (I) maintain dual impairment (II) maintain no impairment or improve, (III) maintain sole impairment or worsen. The maintain dual impairment group had the lowest levels of CR. EI and NC impairments progress differently in FEP. Greater CR may protect against comorbid EI/NC impairment. Identifying these patient characteristics could contribute to the development of personalised interventions.

Factors associated with the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the discrepancy between objective cognitive measures and cognitive subjective complaints in a sample of euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD).

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen participants (83 euthymic patients with BD and 33 healthy controls) were enrolled for this study. Patients were assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and they also reported their subjective cognitive complaints with the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA). The discrepancy between objective and subjective data was calculated using a novel methodology proposed in a previous study (Miskowiak, 2016). Statistical analyses included Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Higher number of previous depressive episodes was identified as one variable associated with the global sensitivity composite score (Beta = 0.25; t = 2.1; p = 0.04) and with the verbal learning and memory sensitivity score (Beta = 0.26; t = 2.16; p = 0.03). That is, patients with more previous depressive episodes tend to over-report cognitive complaints. In contrast, higher number of previous hospitalizations was associated with stoicism in the global total score (Beta = -0.27; t = -2.24: p = 0.029) and in the domain of attention/processing speed (Beta = -0.34; t = -2.52; p = 0.016), indicating patients with more hospitalizations tend to report less cognitive complaints.

DISCUSSION

Our study identified some factors that might help to explain the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive measures in BD, including number of previous depressive episodes and number of previous hospitalizations. This highlights the need of the combined use of both types of cognitive measures to make an accurate assessment of cognitive dysfunctions and their effective treatment.

Differences in facial emotion recognition between bipolar disorder and other clinical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Facial emotion (or expression) recognition (FER) is a domain of affective cognition impaired across various psychiatric conditions, including bipolar disorder (BD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis searching for eligible articles published from inception to April 26, 2023, in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to examine whether and to what extent FER would differ between people with BD and those with other mental disorders. Thirty-three studies comparing 1506 BD patients with 1973 clinical controls were included in the present systematic review, and twenty-six of them were analyzed in random-effects meta-analyses exploring the discrepancies in discriminating or identifying emotional stimuli at a general and specific level. Individuals with BD were more accurate in identifying each type of emotion during a FER task compared to individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (SCZ) (SMD = 0.27; p-value = 0.006), with specific differences in the perception of anger (SMD = 0.46; p-value = 1.19e-06), fear (SMD = 0.38; p-value = 8.2e-04), and sadness (SMD = 0.33; p-value = 0.026). In contrast, BD patients were less accurate than individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) in identifying each type of emotion (SMD = -0.24; p-value = 0.014), but these differences were more specific for sad emotional stimuli (SMD = -0.31; p-value = 0.009). No significant differences were observed when BD was compared with children and adolescents diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. FER emerges as a potential integrative instrument for guiding diagnosis by enabling discrimination between BD and SCZ or MDD. Enhancing the standardization of adopted tasks could further enhance the accuracy of this tool, leveraging FER potential as a therapeutic target.