Patient Preferences for Treatment of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Cross-country Choice Experiment

Selecting the right treatment: Health outcome priorities in older patients with bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Selecting the appropriate treatment for older patients with non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is challenging due to smoking-related comorbidities, treatment toxicity, and an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Considering patient preferences prior to treatment is therefore crucial. Here, we aimed to identify the health outcome priorities of older patients with high-risk NMIBC (HR-NMIBC) or MIBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70 years or older or at risk for frailty, diagnosed with HR-NMIBC or MIBC without distant metastases, were referred for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The CGA consisted of an interview, physical examination, and several tests to examine physical, cognitive, functional, and social status. Quality of life was assessed using EQ5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Health outcome priorities were discussed using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and associations between health outcome priorities and CGA-determinants and quality of life were studied.

RESULTS

Of 146 patients (14 HR-NMIBC, 132 MIBC), OPT data was available for 139. Life extension was most often prioritized (44%), closely followed by preserving independence (40%). Reducing pain (7%) and other symptoms (9%) were less often prioritized. Patients prioritizing life extension had fewer musculoskeletal problems than patients prioritizing reducing pain or other symptoms (p = 0.02). Patients at risk of or suffering from malnutrition more frequently selected reducing pain or other symptoms as their health outcome priority (p = 0.004). For all other CGA-determinants and quality of life, there were no significant differences between groups based on health outcome priorities.

DISCUSSION

In older patients with HR-NMIBC and MIBC, life extension and preserving independence are the most common health outcomes priorities. CGA-determinants and quality of life are generally not associated with the prioritization of health outcomes. As health outcome priorities cannot be predicted by CGA-determinants or quality of life, it is crucial to discuss health outcome priorities with patients to promote shared decision-making.

An evaluation of nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg for the treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represent a significant therapeutic challenge in the treatment of bladder cancer. Nadofaragene firadenovec, represents a breakthrough in this area, offering a novel approach for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

AREAS COVERED

This overview explores the historical development of nadofaragene firadenovec, assessing its efficacy and safety, and discusses future NMIBC therapy directions.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with high grade NMIBC who are BCG unresponsive will have a growing number of treatment alternatives to bladder removal. Nadofaragene firadenovec offers good short-term efficacy but lacks significant durability for most patients. Its strengths include ease of administration and low risk of adverse events. This will need to balance with risk of progression and cost. Furthermore, the likely approval of other agents will require consideration of which therapy to use and for which patient. The need for biomarkers to tailor treatment choices to individual patient needs is becoming more critical. The treatment field is rapidly advancing, with several Phase 3 single-arm trials underway, indicating a potential broader range of treatment options for NMIBC. Further research will be necessary to determine the optimal choice for patients.

Treatment Modalities for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Review

The landscape of treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is rapidly changing. A complete and careful transurethral resection is the mainstay of initial treatment and is followed by intravesical therapy in intermediate or high-risk cases. The standard of care is intravesical BCG. Many alternative or additive approaches to this are being explored. We divided this review into three relevant spaces to consider these novel treatment approaches: (1) low-risk disease, for which intravesical therapy is not usually considered, (2) BCG-naïve disease (i.e., considering alternatives to the standard therapy), and (3) BCG-unresponsive disease. We performed a review of published literature and summarized ongoing trials in the United States. Novel approaches that we explored include surgical techniques for resection, alterations in dwell time for intravesical therapy, delivery method and schedule of intravesical therapies, new intravesical therapy agents, and systemic therapies (especially immunotherapy). These are thoroughly outlined throughout this review article, and the numerous modalities being studied demonstrate significant promise for the future treatment of the expanding space of NMIBC.

Patterns of treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients among Arab urologists

PURPOSE

To understand the treatment plans suggested for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive disease (NMIBC) patients in the Arab countries and therapeutic decisions applied for BCG-naive patients during BCG shortage time.

METHODS

A 10-minute online survey was distributed through the Arab Association of Urology (AAU) office to urologists in the Arab countries who treat patients with NMIBC.

RESULTS

One hundred six urologists responded to the survey. The majority of urologists had treated, in the past 6 months, > 10 patients with NMIBC who were considered BCG-unresponsive (55% of respondents). Radical cystectomy (RC) was the most popular treatment option (recommended by 50%) for these patients. This was followed by intravesical chemotherapy (30%), repeat BCG therapy (12%), resection with ongoing surveillance (8%). Clinical trials and intravenous checkpoint inhibitors were never selected. The most preferred intravesical chemotherapy was by ranking: 60% gemcitabine, 19% mitomycin C, 8% docetaxel, 8% gemcitabine/docetaxel, 4% sequential gemcitabine/mitomycin C, and 1% valrubicin. The use of intravesical chemotherapy appears limited by Arab urologists due to concerns regarding clinical efficacy (fear of progression) and the lack of clear recommendations by urology societies. Given the BCG shortage, which may vary per Arab country, Arab urologists have adjusted by prioritizing BCG for T1 and carcinoma in situ (CIS) patients over Ta, adapting intravesical chemotherapy, and reducing the dose/strength of BCG administered. Most physicians report an eagerness to utilize novel therapies to address the BCG deficit, especially to try intravesical chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though Arab urologists are in the majority of cases selecting RC for BCG-unresponsive cases, one-third of them are most recently initiating intravesical chemotherapy as an alternative option. To further assist Arab urologists in the appropriate selection of BCG unresponsive high risk NMIBC patient treatments, enhanced education and pathway protocols are needed.

Combination intravesical chemotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) as first-line or rescue therapy: where do we stand now?

INTRODUCTION

The combination of intravesical gemcitabine (Gem) with docetaxel (Doce) or with mitomycin C (MMC) has been used in the primary setting as an alternative to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to treat high-risk (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), as well in the rescue setting for patients in whom BCG has failed.

AREA COVERED

Efficacy and safety of Gem/Doce and Gem/MMC to treat NMIBC in BCG-naive and failure settings.

EXPERT OPINION

In the BCG-naive setting, Gem/Doce was the primary alternative combination therapy reported, with a weighted mean of 12- and 24-month recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 79% and 77% for HR disease and 84% and 76% for IR disease, respectively. In the HR BCG-failure setting, the weighted mean of 12- and 24-month RFS was 60% and 42% for Gem/Doce and 63% and 40% for Gem/MMC. While patients without BCG exposure and papillary disease only benefit the most from Gem/Doce, there is also reasonable efficacy in BCG refractory disease and CIS. Combination therapy is well tolerated, with grade III toxicity reported in less than 1% of patients. Unlike single-agent chemotherapy, intravesical Gem/Doce is considered effective and safe regardless of risk-stratification.