Extended Duration of Efficacy of Vardenafil When Taken 8 Hours Before Intercourse: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of RT234 (Vardenafil Inhalation Powder): A First-in-Human, Ascending Single- and Multiple-Dose Study in Healthy Subjects

Background: RT234 (vardenafil inhalation powder) is being developed for pulmonary administration “as needed”, to acutely improve exercise tolerance and symptoms in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized study in 32 healthy adult subjects evaluated single and multiple inhalation doses of RT234, for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs).

Results: RT234 was generally safe and well tolerated at single doses of 0.2–2.4 mg and after repeated dose administration of up to 2.4 mg q4h for four doses daily for 9 days. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate headaches. There was no evidence of pulmonary irritation or inflammation. Vardenafil was absorbed very rapidly after inhalation as RT234, independent of dose level and number of doses administered. The t_max occurred at the time that the first blood sample following completion of dosing. After C_max was achieved, plasma vardenafil concentrations declined rapidly in an exponential fashion that appeared to be parallel among dose levels. Vardenafil plasma concentrations and PK parameters increased in a dose-proportional manner. Vardenafil systemic exposure was notably greater after oral administration of 20 mg vardenafil tablets (Levitra^®) than after administration of any dose level of RT234. During repeated dose administration of RT234, C_max was attained rapidly following each dose and in a pattern similar to that observed after single-dose administration. Minor accumulation, characterized by very low mean morning predose vardenafil concentrations (<0.5 ng/mL), occurred after q4h dosing of up to four doses per day for 9 days. Taken together, these findings show that no clinically important vardenafil accumulation is likely after repeated-dose administration of RT234. Mean vardenafil t_1/2 values were comparable after single- and repeated-dose administration.

Conclusions: Comparative plasma vardenafil bioavailability data from this study provide scientific justification for reliance on Food and Drug Administration findings for Levitra tablets. These findings support further evaluation of RT234 for as-needed treatment of patients with PAH. The Clinical Trials Registration number is ACTRN12618001077257.

An open-label, multicenter, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in Chinese men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy

The study was to compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in Chinese men naοve to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapies. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated whether Chinese men with ED preferred 20-mg tadalafil or 100-mg sildenafil. After a 4 weeks baseline assessment, 383 eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil per 100-mg sildenafil or vice versa for 8 weeks respectively and then chose which treatment they preferred to take during the 8 weeks extension. Primary efficacy was measured by Question 1 of the PDE5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire (PITPQ). Secondary efficacy was analyzed by PITPQ Question 2, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain, sexual encounter profile (SEP) Questions 2 and 3, and the Drug Attributes Questionnaire. Three hundred and fifty men (91%) completed the randomized treatment phase. Two hundred and forty-two per 350 (69.1%) patients preferred 20-mg tadalafil, and 108/350 (30.9%) preferred 100-mg sildenafil (P < 0.001) as their treatment in the 8 weeks extension. Ninety-two per 242 (38%) patients strongly preferred tadalafil and 37/108 (34.3%) strongly the preferred sildenafil. The SEP2 (penetration), SEP3 (successful intercourse), and IIEF-EF domain scores were improved in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups. For patients who preferred tadalafil, getting an erection long after taking the medication was the most reported reason for tadalafil preference. The only treatment-emergent adverse event reported by > 2% of men was headache. After tadalafil and sildenafil treatments, more Chinese men with ED naοve to PDE5 inhibitor preferred tadalafil. Both sildenafil and tadalafil treatments were effective and safe.

Udenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is often perceived by both patients and sexual partners as a serious problem that can jeopardize quality of life, psychosocial or emotional well-being, and the partnership in the long term. Since their introduction, oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) have been found to be highly effective and well tolerated, and are available as the first-line therapy for the treatment of ED. Udenafil is one of the selective PDE5Is made available in recent years for the treatment of ED. Udenafil has clinical properties of both relatively rapid onset and long duration of action due to its pharmacokinetic profile, thereby providing an additional treatment option for ED men to better suit individual needs. There is positive evidence that udenafil is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ED of a broad spectrum of etiologies or severity. Udenafil is as effective in the treatment of diabetes mellitus-associated ED as other PDE5Is. Due to the clinical property of relatively long duration of action, udenafil may be another option in daily dosing treatment for ED, as suggested by its favorable efficacy and safety profile. Most adverse effects reported from clinical trials are mild or moderate in severity, without any serious adverse event, with headache and flushing being the most common. Also, the concomitant use of anti-hypertensive drugs or alpha-1-blockers does not significantly affect the efficacy and safety profile of udenafil. However, additional studies with larger cohorts including prospective, multicenter, comparative studies with patients of different ethnicities are needed to further validate the favorable findings of udenafil in the treatment of ED.

SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most frequently treated male sexual dysfunction worldwide. ED is a chronic condition that exerts a negative impact on male self-esteem and nearly all life domains including interpersonal, family, and business relationships.

AIM

The aim of this study is to provide an updated overview on currently used and available conservative treatment options for ED with a special focus on their efficacy, tolerability, safety, merits, and limitations including the role of combination therapies for monotherapy failures.

METHODS

The methods used were PubMed and MEDLINE searches using the following keywords: ED, phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, oral drug therapy, intracavernosal injection therapy, transurethral therapy, topical therapy, and vacuum-erection therapy/constriction devices. Additionally, expert opinions by the authors of this article are included.

RESULTS

Level 1 evidence exists that changes in sedentary lifestyle with weight loss and optimal treatment of concomitant diseases/risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) can either improve ED or add to the efficacy of ED-specific therapies, e.g., PDE5 inhibitors. Level 1 evidence also exists that treatment of hypogonadism with total testosterone < 300 ng/dL (10.4 nmol/L) can either improve ED or add to the efficacy of PDE5 inhibitors. There is level 1 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the following monotherapies in a spectrum-wide range of ED populations: PDE5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PGE1, synonymous alprostadil) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/phentolamine, and transurethral PGE1 therapy. There is level 2 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the following ED treatments: vacuum-erection therapy in a wide range of ED populations, oral L-arginine (3-5 g), topical PGE1 in special ED populations, intracavernosal injection therapy with papaverine/phentolamine (bimix), or papaverine/phentolamine/PGE1 (trimix) combination mixtures. There is level 3 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of oral yohimbine in nonorganic ED. There is level 3 evidence that combination therapies of PDE5 inhibitors + either transurethral or intracavernosal injection therapy generate better efficacy rates than either monotherapy alone. There is level 4 evidence showing enhanced efficacy with the combination of vacuum-erection therapy + either PDE5 inhibitor or transurethral PGE1 or intracavernosal injection therapy. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that combination therapy of PDE5 inhibitors + L-arginine or daily dosing of tadalafil + short-acting PDE5 inhibitors pro re nata may rescue PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy failures. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that adding either PDE5 inhibitors or transurethral PGE1 may improve outcome of penile prosthetic surgery regarding soft (cold) glans syndrome. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that the combination of PDE5 inhibitors and dapoxetine is effective and safe in patients suffering from both ED and premature ejaculation.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess safety and efficacy of vardenafil 10 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg vs. tamsulosin 0.4 mg alone in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and vardenafil are well established: however, there is no report regarding combined therapy with these drugs for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day vs. tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day plus vardenafil 10 mg/day in patients with LUTS/BPH in a randomized trial with 12-week follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 60 men with persistent storage LUTS after 2-week run-in with tamsulosin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-bother, International Index of Erectile Function, Version 5 (IIEF-5) and Over Active Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) scores, uroflowmetry data (Qmax, Qave), and postvoiding residual urine were recorded after run-in (baseline), and 2 and 12 weeks after treatment. Differences between vardenafil and placebo at different times were calculated with unpaired samples t-test. Between-group differences in change from baseline to 2 and 12 weeks were evaluated with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

We found a between-group significant difference from baseline to 12 weeks in the following: (i) Qmax (placebo: +0.07, vardenafil: +2.56, P = 0.034); (ii) Qave (placebo: -0.15, vardenafil: +1.02, P = 0.031); (iii) irritative-IPSS subscores (placebo: -1.67, vardenafil: -3.11, P = 0.039); and (iv) IIEF (placebo: +0.06, vardenafil: +2.61, P = 0.030). No patient reported any serious (grade ≥ 2) adverse event (AE). There were no differences in the incidence of common, treatment-related AEs between men undergoing combined therapy or tamsulosin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tamsulosin and vardenafil for 12 weeks was well tolerated and more effective to improve both LUTS and erectile function, as compared with tamsulosin alone. Further studies are needed to assess the role of combined therapy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and alpha blockers in treating LUTS/BPH.

Vardenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: an overview of the clinical evidence

Many men with erectile dysfunction (ED) also have associated underlying cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, for which they are likely to be taking medication. Therefore, cardiovascular safety and potential drug interactions are two of the major concerns when using PDE-5 inhibitors in these patients. The PDE-5 inhibitor, vardenafil, is characterized by a rapid onset of action, increased duration of erection, high rates of first-dose success and reliable efficacy that can be maintained with continued use. In both clinical trials and real-life observational studies, vardenafil has demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in men with ED, including those with associated underlying conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Importantly, the concomitant use of medication for these conditions is not associated with any noteworthy changes in the efficacy and safety of vardenafil. The evidence presented in this review supports the use of vardenafil as a first-line treatment for men with ED, including those with underlying conditions.

Toward a new 'EPOCH': optimising treatment outcomes with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

Despite the marked adverse impacts of erectile dysfunction (ED) on quality of life and well-being, many patients (and/or their partners) do not seek medical attention for this problem, do not receive treatment or discontinue such treatment even when it has effectively restored erectile responses to sexual stimulation. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are considered first-line therapies for men with ED. To help physicians maximise the likelihood of treatment success with these agents, we conducted an English-language PubMed search of articles involving approved PDE5 inhibitors dating from 1 January 1998 (the year in which sildenafil citrate was introduced), through 31 August 2008. In addition to sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, search terms included 'adhere*', 'couple*', 'effect*', 'effic*', 'partner*', 'satisf*', 'succe*' and 'treatment outcome.' Based on our analysis, physician activities to promote favourable treatment outcomes may be captured under the mnemonic 'EPOCH': (i) Evaluating and educating patients and partners to ensure realistic expectations of therapy; (ii) Prescribing a treatment individualised to the couple's lifestyle needs and other preferences; (iii) Optimising treatment outcomes by scheduling follow-up visits with the patient to 'fine-tune' dosages and revisit key educational messages; (iv) Controlling comorbidities via lifestyle counselling, medications and/or referrals and (v) Helping patients and their partners to meet their health and psychosocial needs, potentially referring them to a specialist for other forms of therapy if they are not satisfied with PDE5 inhibitors.

Vardenafil in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Alpha-blockers, the current common treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), are also used to treat bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), but the effect is not as clinically significant as in LUTS. All currently marketed phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have recently been shown to significantly affect LUTS, although BOO-related efficacy has not been determined. Therefore, the extent of a causal relationship between LUTS and underlying benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is questionable. LUTS may also be interpreted as symptoms related to detrusor overactivity, especially when no significant BOO is associated with BPE. Research is required to understand the efficacy of PDE5 inhibitors in LUTS but not in BOO. For vardenafil, nonclinical experiments and initial, preliminary clinical data suggest that the underlying effect may occur on the detrusor and not the prostate.

Product-related research: how research can contribute to successful life-cycle management

Declining productivity with decreasing new molecular entity output combined with increased R&D spending is one of the key challenges for the entire pharmaceutical industry. In order to offset decreasing new molecular entity output, life-cycle management activities for established drugs become more and more important to maintain or even expand clinical indication and market opportunities. Life-cycle management covers a whole range of activities from strategic pricing to a next generation product launch. In this communication, we review how research organizations can contribute to successful life-cycle management strategies using phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors as an example.

A randomised, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of twice-daily vardenafil in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and reduced patient quality of life (QoL). Phosphodiesterase (type) 5 (PDE5) inhibitors such as vardenafil are commonly used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), but have also been shown to improve the symptoms of BPH. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effects of vardenafil on LUTS and QoL in men with BPH/LUTS, with or without concomitant ED.

METHODS

Men aged 45-64 yr with BPH/LUTS and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or =12 were randomised to receive either 10mg vardenafil or placebo twice daily. LUTS were assessed with the use of two primary efficacy parameters, IPSS score and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), as well as postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume; ED was measured with the use of the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF); and QoL was assessed with the Urolifetrade mark QoL-9 questionnaire.

RESULTS

After 8 wk of treatment, there was a significant improvement in the IPSS total score in the vardenafil group compared with placebo (-5.9 and -3.6, respectively; p=0.0013). Nominally significant improvements in irritative and obstructive IPSS subscores (p=0.0017 and p=0.0081, respectively), EF (p=0.0001), and Urolife QoL-9 (p<0.0001) were also associated with vardenafil treatment. Qmax and PVR urine volume did not change significantly with treatment, although baseline values were already considered close to normal. Vardenafil was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events considered mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil treatment significantly improved LUTS, EF, and QoL in men with BPH/LUTS. Vardenafil may be considered a promising treatment option for men with symptoms secondary to BPH.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy: identifying and exploring what attributes matter more to clinicians and patients in the management of erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is increasingly being recognized as a sentinel marker of future subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Predicted increases in the prevalence of ED are due to a combination of an aging population and the increasing presence of comorbid conditions (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes). The dichotomy of the situation is that ED is often associated with these comorbidities, potentially leading to greater CVD risk, and conversely, these comorbidities have also been shown to increase the risk of developing ED. The successful treatment of ED with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy, therefore, is of paramount importance because it not only plays a critical role in restoring erectile function, but also provides clinicians with the opportunity to mitigate existing cardiovascular comorbidities or prevent the occurrence of CVD in this patient population.

METHODS

This review is based on an electronic literature search of databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, with information selected for its relevance to PDE5 inhibitor therapy comprising efficacy (e.g., first-dose success) in men with ED with or without comorbidities, onset and duration of action at specific time points, and patient preference.

RESULTS

The introduction of PDE5 inhibitors represented a major advance in the treatment of ED. In spite of the availability of these agents, a large percentage of men are still not being treated, in many cases because of their reluctance to seek medical help. Moreover, many men who start treatment with PDE5 inhibitors discontinue treatment. Reasons for discontinuation are many and complex, including lack of initial or first-time success. Although of major concern to both patients and clinicians, there remains limited published clinical data on this specific parameter in the pertinent patient population and from prospective, randomized clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

Data from studies suggests that the available PDE5 inhibitor therapies are effective in treating men with ED, including those who have increased CVD risk and those who have clinically identified cardiovascular comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or diabetes. According to data from studies, the attributes of PDE5 inhibitor therapy that matter more to clinicians and patients and that hold influence over treatment compliance include effectiveness in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, first dose effectiveness or early success, rapid onset of action, reliability, and tolerability.

Patterns of switching phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results from the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study

AIMS

This report describes patterns of treatment changes with the phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors tadalafil, sildenafil and vardenafil, and variables associated with those treatment changes, during the 6-month, prospective, pan-European Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study (EDOS).

METHODS

EDOS observed 8047 men > or = 18 years old with erectile dysfunction (ED), who began or changed ED therapy as part of their routine healthcare. Patients could change ED treatment at any time during EDOS. Data were collected at baseline and at 3 (+/- 1) and 6 (+/- 1) months. Analyses included ED treatment-naïve patients with complete follow-up who were prescribed a PDE5 inhibitor at baseline (n = 4026).

RESULTS

Most patients, regardless of what PDE5 inhibitor they were prescribed at baseline, continued on that same PDE5 inhibitor throughout the study. Continuation rates were approximately 89% in the tadalafil cohort, vs. 63-64% in the sildenafil and vardenafil cohorts. The variables most strongly associated with increased risk of switching were prescription of sildenafil or vardenafil, vs. tadalafil, at baseline (odds ratios 4.43 and 4.14 respectively; p < 0.0001). Of patients who switched from tadalafil to another treatment, nearly 25% had switched back to tadalafil by study end. In contrast, of patients who switched from sildenafil or vardenafil, < 10% from each cohort had switched back to their original treatment by study end.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that tadalafil treatment in treatment-naïve ED patients may increase their likelihood of treatment continuation. These findings should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational nature of the study.

Do vardenafil and tadalafil have advantages over sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction?

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men between the ages of 40 and 70 years of age. Sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil have all been shown to be similarly effective in the treatment of men with ED of vary etiologies, to have similar adverse effects profiles, and to improve quality-of-life by similar amounts. As these phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors all increase the hypotensive effects of nitrates, they are not suitable for use in patients taking nitrates for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. All three inhibitors must be used with caution in patients taking alpha(1)-adrenoceptors antagonists for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although nonarteritic anterior ischaemic neuropathy has been reported in some users of the PDE5 inhibitors, there is no conclusive evidence that PDE5 inhibitors cause this rare effect. Tadalafil has a longer half-life than sildenafil or vardenafil, and a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Most preference studies have shown tadalafil to be preferred, but there are serious limitations to some of these studies. One approach to treatment is to give each patient a short- and long-acting agent, and for individuals to decide their preference.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: the day after

OBJECTIVE

Review the literature on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is), addressing critical issues in their current and future use, assessing unanswered questions, and identifying research needs.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted on PDE5-Is, with emphasis on clinical trials and experience, for interpretation and analysis of their present and future role.

RESULTS

Although approximately 40 million patients with erectile dysfunction have been treated successfully worldwide with the three available PDE5-Is, inappropriate instructions, lack of follow-up, and lack of patient-centered care models are the main reasons for "non-response," leading to drop-out rates of >50%. Patients with severe neurologic damage, diabetes mellitus, or severe vascular disease may be resistant to PDE5-Is. Preservation of corporal smooth muscle with chronic administration of PDE5-Is has been reported and substantial evidence indicates that these drugs have beneficial effects on endothelium and cardiovascular function; sildenafil has been approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. Improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia after PDE5-I administration has been also suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate the necessity for (1) exploration of the pharmacologic characteristics of the three PDE5-Is; (2) research on their pharmacologic differences because some actions seems to be drug-specific; (3) development of alternative management strategies, such as chronic, low, everyday doses of PDE5-Is, if the monthly cost is affordable; and (4) clinical trials on use of PDE5-Is to treat other chronic conditions. The door for innovative therapeutic approaches will open, specifically for cross-risk factor treatment with PDE5-Is or their use in combination treatments or new multimodal pills that take advantage of drugs that exert pleiotropic vascular actions.