1
|
Jeong SH, Ku JH. Treatment strategies for the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:103-106. [PMID: 36882168 PMCID: PMC9995951 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hwan Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Role of renin-angiotensin system blockers on BCG response in non-muscle invasive, high risk bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e303-e309. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Cheng C, Qiu D, Chen J, Zu X, Liu J, Li H, Hu J, Yi Z, He T, Chen Z, Cui Y. Efficacy of Intra-Arterial Plus Intravesical Chemotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Pooled Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:707271. [PMID: 34603020 PMCID: PMC8481664 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.707271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains highly debated for its high recurrence and progression risk. This work aimed to verify the efficacy and toxicity of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) plus intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) in high-risk NMIBC. Methods: A comprehensive online literature search was conducted in three databases to select researches related to IAC + IVC for high-risk NMIBC. All data were analyzed using the Review Manager software version 5.3. And we used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assessed the quality of these enrolled researches. Results: Seven eligible original publications were enrolled in our studies with a total of 1,247 patients. Compared with the intravesical instillation, IAC + IVC therapy showed a better therapeutic effect. The total odds ratio for tumor recurrence rate, tumor progression rate, survival rate, and tumor-specific death rate was calculated as 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72; p < 0.05), 0.51 (95% CI: 0.36–0.72; p < 0.05), 1.75 (95% CI: 1.09–2.81; p < 0.05), and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.28–0.84; p < 0.05), respectively. In patients who received IAC, most of the adverse events (AEs)in the treatment were Grade I and II. Conclusion: IAC + IVC regimen for high-risk NMIBC could effectively reduce recurrence and progression and provide a better prognosis than intravesical instillation. The adverse events of IAC were mild and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunliang Cheng
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Dongxu Qiu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiongbing Zu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinhui Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huihuang Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiao Hu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhenglin Yi
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tongchen He
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu Cui
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bree KK, Brooks NA, Kamat AM. Current Therapy and Emerging Intravesical Agents to Treat Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 35:513-529. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
5
|
Zang J, Ye K, Fei Y, Zhang R, Chen H, Zhuang G. Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Insights From Single-Cell Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:696716. [PMID: 34123863 PMCID: PMC8187798 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.696716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is a global challenge of public health with limited therapeutic options. Although the emergence of cancer immunotherapy, most notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, represents a major breakthrough in the past decade, many patients still suffer from unsatisfactory clinical outcome. A thorough understanding of the fundamental cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for antitumor immunity may lead to optimized treatment guidelines and new immunotherapeutic strategies. With technological developments and protocol refinements, single-cell approaches have become powerful tools that provide unprecedented insights into the kaleidoscopic tumor microenvironment and intricate cell-cell communications. In this review, we summarize recent applications of single-cell analysis in characterizing the UBC multicellular ecosystem, and discuss how to leverage the high-resolution information for more effective immune-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Zang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kaiyan Ye
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Fei
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiyun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haige Chen
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guanglei Zhuang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The current landscape of salvage therapies for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:178-187. [PMID: 33742981 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although radical cystectomy represents the gold standard treatment for patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) whose disease does not respond to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), many patients are unable or unwilling to undergo surgery. The need remains for effective bladder-preserving therapies. This review aims to describe existing treatments, contemporary research in this field and ongoing trials of salvage therapies for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. RECENT FINDINGS Intravesical chemotherapy has been utilized frequently in this setting. Emerging data on combination regimens such as intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel and intravesical cabazitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin are promising; nevertheless, larger, prospective trials are needed. Meanwhile, the intravenous checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab was recently FDA-approved for patients BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Encouraging clinical trial results for intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec, oportuzumab monatox and ALT-803 + BCG have been released, while data from trials of other treatment strategies, including novel chemotherapy and drug delivery, augmented BCG immunotherapy, adenoviral and gene therapy, targeted therapy, and combination systemic immunotherapy with intravesical agents, are eagerly awaited. SUMMARY Several novel salvage therapies offer promise for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Patient selection, efficacy, safety, cost and ease of administration must be carefully considered to determine the optimal treatment approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
BCG-unresponsive high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: what does the practicing urologist need to know? World J Urol 2021; 39:4037-4046. [PMID: 33772322 PMCID: PMC7997797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03666-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a well-established treatment for preventing or delaying tumour recurrence following high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) resection. However, many patients will experience recurrence or progression during or following BCG. This scenario has been one of the most challenging in urologic oncology for several decades since BCG implementation. Finally, significant progress has occurred lately. The aim of this review was to summarize for the practising urologist the current treatment options available in 2020 or expected to be ready for routine use in the near future for patients with high-risk NMIBC who experience BCG failure. Methods Narrative review using data through the end of 2020. Results First, the definition of BCG unresponsive disease which is critical in counseling and managing patients has finally reached a consensus. Second, some promising options other than radical cystectomy are finally available and many other should be in a near future. The options can be categorized as chemotherapy, device-assisted therapy, check-point inhibitors, new intravesical and systemic agents and sequential combinations of these newer modalities with conventional therapy. Conclusions Considering the options that are currently under scrutiny, many of which in phase III trials, clinicians should have at their disposal several new treatment options in the next five years.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Bladder cancer has been successfully treated with immunotherapy, whereas prostate cancer is a cold tumor with inadequate immune-related treatment response. A greater understanding of the tumor microenvironment and methods for harnessing the immune system to address tumor growth will be needed to improve immunotherapies for both prostate and bladder cancer. Here, we provide an overview of prostate and bladder cancer, including fundamental aspects of the disease and treatment, the elaborate cellular makeup of the tumor microenvironment, and methods for exploiting relevant pathways to develop more effective treatments.
Collapse
|
9
|
Carando R, Soldini E, Cotrufo S, Zazzara M, Ludovico GM. Electro-mediated drug administration of mitomycin C in preventing non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Arab J Urol 2020; 19:71-77. [PMID: 33763251 PMCID: PMC7954506 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1816150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of electro-mediated drug administration of mitomycin C (EMDA/MMC) after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT) in preventing non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression and to explore clinical and demographic factors associated with treatment response. Patients and methods Between April 2016 and August 2019, 112 patients diagnosed with intermediate- or high-risk NMIBC underwent a TURBT followed by an EMDA/MMC treatment. The percentage of treatment responders and progression-free survivors at 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Results Follow-up data were available for 101 patients (90%) at 3 months and 92 (82%) at 6 months. Response rates to EMDA/MMC treatment were 85% at 3 months and 75% at 6 months, and progression-free rates were 94% and 90%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen between intermediate- and high-risk patients. A higher risk of tumour recurrence and progression was associated with previous Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) failure. According to the Clavien–Dindo classification, only low-grade complications were observed. Conclusions EMDA/MMC after TURBT was associated with high response and progression-free rates at 3 and 6 months, with only low-grade adverse events. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of EMDA/MMC as a therapeutic option for both intermediate- and high-risk patients. However, patients with BCG failure responded poorly to EMDA/MMC. Abbreviations: ACCI: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index; CHT: chemohyperthermia; CIS: carcinoma in situ; EMDA: electro-mediated drug administration; EORTC: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; IQR: interquartile range; (N)MIBC: (non-)muscle-invasive bladder cancer; MMC: mitomycin C; OR, odds ratio; TURBT: transurethral resection of the bladder tumour
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Carando
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.,Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.,Clinica S. Anna, Sorengo, Switzerland.,Clinica S. Chiara, Locarno, Switzerland
| | - Emiliano Soldini
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, Research Methodology Competence Centre, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Simone Cotrufo
- Department of Urology, Ospedale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Zazzara
- Department of Urology, Ospedale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ludovico
- Department of Urology, Ospedale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pierconti F, Raspollini MR, Martini M, Larocca LM, Bassi PF, Bientinesi R, Baroni G, Minervini A, Petracco G, Pini GM, Patriarca C. PD-L1 expression in bladder primary in situ urothelial carcinoma: evaluation in BCG-unresponsive patients and BCG responders. Virchows Arch 2020; 477:269-277. [PMID: 32034486 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-02755-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Carcinoma in situ (CIS) is believed to be a precursor of muscle-invasive carcinomas that may arise from these flat high-grade, superficial urothelial lesions. CIS accounts for approximately 10% of all bladder tumors. Therapeutic options for urothelial CIS are limited, and in order to inhibit disease progression and recurrence, current guidelines recommend transurethral resection (TURBT) followed by intravesical administration of Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Approximately 30-40% of patients fail the BCG therapy with recurrence and progression of disease. In the present study, we examined the expression of PD-L1 both in neoplastic epithelial cells and in stromal inflammatory cells in patients with diagnosis of CIS primary responders and not responders to BCG therapy, in order to verify if the PD-L1 expression could identify patients resistant to BCG treatment. Moreover, we analyzed on the same cases the immunoreactivities of anti-PD-L1 MoAbs such as SP263, C23, and SP142. Our results have showed that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and in immune cell compartment is higher in BCG-unresponsive group than in BCG responders, but only the PD-L1 22C3 expression in tumor cells seems to be associated with recurrence of disease (p = 0.035; OR 0.1204; CI 95% from 0.0147 to 1.023). Hence, our data suggest that the PD-L1 22C3 expression could help to identify CIS that fail the BCG therapy, supporting the hypothesis that enhanced levels of intratumoral PD-L1 22C3 expressed by the tumor cells may explain the failure of BCG immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pierconti
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00141, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Maurizio Martini
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00141, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Maria Larocca
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00141, Rome, Italy
| | - Pier Francesco Bassi
- Department of Urology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bientinesi
- Department of Urology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Baroni
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Guido Petracco
- Department of Pathology, Azienda ospedaliera Lariana, Ospedale St Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Giacomo Maria Pini
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlo Patriarca
- Department of Pathology, Azienda ospedaliera Lariana, Ospedale St Anna, Como, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Current Clinical Trials in Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Heightened Need in an Era of Chronic BCG Shortage. Curr Urol Rep 2019; 20:84. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0952-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
12
|
Chen S, Lu M, Peng T, Wang Y, Liu X, Xiao Y, Wang X. Establishing the prediction models for recurrence and progression of T1G3 bladder urothelial carcinoma. J Cancer 2019; 10:5891-5902. [PMID: 31762799 PMCID: PMC6856570 DOI: 10.7150/jca.35866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We aim to determine clinical recurrence and progression risk factors of T1G3 bladder cancer (BCa), and to establish recurrence and progression prediction models. 5-year follow-up records of 106 T1G3 BCa patients from January 2012 to December 2016 were analyzed for recurrence and progression. Two-sample T-test, Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors. Effective prognostic nomograms were established to provide individualized prediction, and the calibration curves were founded to evaluate the agreements of the predicted probability with the actual observed probability. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for the recurrence and progression prediction models. The stability of prediction models was validated with an external cohort included 61 T1G3 BCa patients. Of the 106 T1G3 BCa patients, 77 were males (72.6%) and 29 were females (27.4%), with median age 70 years. Within 5 years, recurrence was identified in 67 cases (63.2%), and progression was identified in 31 cases (29.2%). The results showed that large size of tumor, multifocal tumors, recrudescent tumor, non-BCG perfusion therapy were the independent risk factors for recurrence, and large size of tumor, multifocal tumors, recrudescent tumor, concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) were the independent risk factors for progression. However, no evidence shown that tumor location or operative method was independent risk factors for recurrence and progression. Based on the results of Cox regression analyses, the independent risk factors were used to establish the prediction nomograms to calculate the recurrence and progression probability of each T1G3 BCa patient. Calibration curves, ROC curves and external validation displayed that the nomograms had great value of prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430071 China
| | - Mengxin Lu
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430071 China
| | - Tianchen Peng
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Medical Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Yejinpeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Medical Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xuefeng Liu
- Department of Pathology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington DC, USA
| | - Yu Xiao
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430071 China.,Department of Biological Repositories, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xinghuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.,Human Genetics Resource Preservation Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430071 China.,Medical Research Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arends TJH, Alfred Witjes J. Apaziquone for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Where Are We Now? Urol Clin North Am 2019; 47:73-82. [PMID: 31757302 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Apaziquone is an interesting drug for intravesical use in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer; however, more research is needed to prove its actual benefit. Although the apaziquone trials demonstrate the potential of this new drug, the singular phase 3 trials did not reach their primary endpoint. To date, no new trials are recruiting, so the development of apaziquone seems to have stopped.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom J H Arends
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groote plein zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hobbs C, Bass E, Crew J, Mostafid H. Intravesical BCG: where do we stand? Past, present and future. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415818817120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
High and intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer poses a real challenge for treatment. Approximately 70% of bladder cancer presents as non-muscle invasive and 20–25% will progress to muscle invasive disease. Recurrences occur in up to 70% but treatment options are limited. Intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin is still considered the bladder sparing treatment of choice despite its well documented pitfalls. This review considers how bacillus Calmette–Guérin has become the recommended treatment, its benefits and risks and the alternative options for treatment. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward Bass
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jeremy Crew
- Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, UK
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
How Should I Manage a Patient with Tumor Recurrence Despite Adequate Bacille Calmette-Guérin? Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 3:252-257. [PMID: 31307960 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Intravesical immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is the main treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), with proven effects on reducing recurrence, progression, and death from NMIBC. However, it is not effective in all patients, and recurrence after adequate BCG therapy can frequently lead to progression to more life-threatening disease. This point-counterpoint review considers how to treat a healthy 60-yr-old patient with T1 high-grade NMIBC fitting the new definition of BCG-unresponsive disease, that is, persistent high-grade disease at 6-12mo, despite an adequate course of induction and maintenance with BCG. PATIENT SUMMARY: When T1 high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is persistent or recurs shortly after a full course of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) plus maintenance, further BCG is not likely to work; this meets the new definition of a "BCG unresponsive" disease. For this situation, the safest (curative) option is removal of the bladder. If that is not an accepted alternative, then a clinical trial or combination intravesical chemotherapy or hyperchemotherapy may be another option.
Collapse
|
16
|
Prediction of BCG responses in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the era of novel immunotherapeutics. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:1089-1099. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02183-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
17
|
Updates on the use of intravesical therapies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: how, when and what. World J Urol 2018; 37:2017-2029. [PMID: 30535583 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2591-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravesical therapy has been an important aspect of the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for 40 years. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is considered standard of care for intermediate and high-grade non-invasive disease, yet understanding the nuances of subsequent intravesical therapy is important for any provider managing bladder cancer. Herein, we review the literature and describe optimal use of intravesical therapies for NMIBC. METHODS A comprehensive search of the medical literature was performed and highlighted in this review of intravesical therapy for NMIBC. RESULTS Post-resection intravesical Mitomycin C therapy for low-risk disease remains an important component of care, and gemcitabine now has level-one evidence demonstrating efficacy in this setting but is not yet a guideline recommendation. BCG intravesical therapy remains the most effective therapy preventing recurrence and progression of intermediate and high-risk NMIBC. Adequately characterizing BCG-failure is critical in determining the next step in management which includes radical cystectomy, additional intravesical immunotherapy, chemotherapy with intravesical gemcitabine ± docetaxel and clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Intravesical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for NMIBC and bladder preservation. Intravesical induction BCG followed by maintenance therapy remains standard of care for intermediate and high-risk patients. Detailing the timing and characteristics of recurrence after intravesical therapy is crucial in determining subsequent treatment recommendations. Current clinical trials focus on systemic immunotherapy and enhancing the intravesical immune response by augmenting the delivery mechanism.
Collapse
|
18
|
Klaassen Z, Kamat AM, Kassouf W, Gontero P, Villavicencio H, Bellmunt J, van Rhijn BW, Hartmann A, Catto JW, Kulkarni GS. Treatment Strategy for Newly Diagnosed T1 High-grade Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: New Insights and Updated Recommendations. Eur Urol 2018; 74:597-608. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
19
|
Wang Y, Liu J, Yang X, Liu Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Sun L, Yang X, Niu H. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and anti-PD-L1 combination therapy boosts immune response against bladder cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:2891-2899. [PMID: 29844686 PMCID: PMC5962256 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s165840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a critical immune checkpoint molecule which promotes immunosuppression by binding to PD-1 on T-cells in tumor immunity. We have previously identified that activation of toll like receptor 4 (TLR-4), which serves an important role in the induction of antitumor immune response during Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy, could upregulate PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer (BCa) cells through the classical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and subsequently weaken the cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL). It is, therefore, necessary to investigate the possible potential relationship between PD-L1 expression and BCG immunotherapy. Materials and methods In this study we investigated the effects of BCG treatment on PD-L1 expression in BCa cells and also evaluated the efficacy of BCG and anti-PD-L1 combination therapy in immunocompetent orthotopic rat BCa models. Results We found that PD-L1 expression was obviously upregulated in BCa cells in response to BCG treatment both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, BCG and anti-PD-L1 combination treatment activated a potent antitumor immune response with the increase in the number and activity of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, as well as the reduction in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and eventually elicits prominent tumor growth inhibition and prolonged survival, and was found to be much more effective than either agent alone. Conclusion These findings highlight the adaptive dynamic regulation of PD-L1 in response to BCG immunotherapy and suggest that combination of BCG immunotherapy with PD-L1 blockade may be an effective antitumor strategy for improving treatment outcomes of BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fukumoto K, Kikuchi E, Mikami S, Hayakawa N, Matsumoto K, Niwa N, Oya M. Clinical Role of Programmed Cell Death-1 Expression in Patients with Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Recurring After Initial Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2484-2491. [PMID: 29717423 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6498-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway has been suggested to play an important role in tumor immune escape. We evaluated changes in PD-1 expression before and after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy and its prognostic significance in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. METHODS We examined 78 paired tissue samples of NMIBC in tumors just before BCG therapy and BCG-relapsing tumors, defined as recurrence after achieving disease-free status by initial BCG instillations for 6 months. We counted PD-1-positive cells, and PD-1 expression was defined as high when the number of PD-1-positive cells was more than 18 under ×200 magnification. RESULTS The median number of PD-1-positive cells in tumors just before BCG therapy was 3.5, significantly lower than that in BCG-relapsing tumors (17.0, p < 0.001). High PD-1 expression was observed in 20 tumors just before BCG therapy (25.6%) and 36 BCG-relapsing tumors (46.2%). Fifty-two cases (66.6%) showed an increase in the number of PD-1-positive cells in BCG-relapsing tumors. High PD-1 expression in BCG-relapsing tumors was independently associated with subsequent tumor recurrence (p = 0.011) and stage progression (p = 0.033). The 5-year recurrence-free and progression-free survival rates were 40.7 and 74.1% in patients with high PD-1 expression in BCG-relapsing tumors, significantly lower than those in their counterparts (72.9 and 94.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS PD-1 was induced by BCG therapy, and its expression in BCG-relapsing tumors may be an important indicator for predicting worse clinical outcomes in NMIBC patients treated with BCG therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keishiro Fukumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shuji Mikami
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Naoya Niwa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rayn KN, Hale GR, Grave GPL, Agarwal PK. New therapies in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer treatment. Indian J Urol 2018; 34:11-19. [PMID: 29343907 PMCID: PMC5769243 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_296_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a very challenging disease to treat with high rates of recurrence and progression associated with current therapies. Recent technological and biological advances have led to the development of novel agents in NMIBC therapy. Methods: We reviewed existing literature as well as currently active and recently completed clinical trials in NMIBC by querying PubMed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: A wide variety of new therapies in NMIBC treatment are currently being developed, utilizing recent developments in the understanding of immune therapies and cancer biology. Conclusion: The ongoing efforts to develop new therapeutic approaches for NMIBC look very promising and are continuing to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem N Rayn
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Graham R Hale
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Piyush K Agarwal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Radical Cystectomy (RC) with Urinary Diversion. Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00023-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
23
|
Shore ND, Boorjian SA, Canter DJ, Ogan K, Karsh LI, Downs TM, Gomella LG, Kamat AM, Lotan Y, Svatek RS, Bivalacqua TJ, Grubb RL, Krupski TL, Lerner SP, Woods ME, Inman BA, Milowsky MI, Boyd A, Treasure FP, Gregory G, Sawutz DG, Yla-Herttuala S, Parker NR, Dinney CPN. Intravesical rAd-IFNα/Syn3 for Patients With High-Grade, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-Refractory or Relapsed Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Phase II Randomized Study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:3410-3416. [PMID: 28834453 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.72.3064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Many patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are either refractory to bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment or may experience disease relapse. We assessed the efficacy and safety of recombinant adenovirus interferon alfa with Syn3 (rAd-IFNα/Syn3), a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus gene transfer vector, for patients with high-grade (HG) BCG-refractory or relapsed NMIBC. Methods In this open-label, multicenter (n = 13), parallel-arm, phase II study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01687244), 43 patients with HG BCG-refractory or relapsed NMIBC received intravesical rAd-IFNα/Syn3 (randomly assigned 1:1 to 1 × 1011 viral particles (vp)/mL or 3 × 1011 vp/mL). Patients who responded at months 3, 6, and 9 were retreated at months 4, 7, and 10. The primary end point was 12-month HG recurrence-free survival (RFS). All patients who received at least one dose were included in efficacy and safety analyses. Results Forty patients received rAd-IFNα/Syn3 (1 × 1011 vp/mL, n = 21; 3 × 1011 vp/mL, n = 19) between November 5, 2012, and April 8, 2015. Fourteen patients (35.0%; 90% CI, 22.6% to 49.2%) remained free of HG recurrence 12 months after initial treatment. Comparable 12-month HG RFS was noted for both doses. Of these 14 patients, two experienced recurrence at 21 and 28 months, respectively, after treatment initiation, and one died as a result of an upper tract tumor at 17 months without a recurrence. rAd-IFNα/Syn3 was well tolerated; no grade four or five adverse events (AEs) occurred, and no patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were micturition urgency (n = 16; 40%), dysuria (n = 16; 40%), fatigue (n = 13; 32.5%), pollakiuria (n = 11; 28%), and hematuria and nocturia (n = 10 each; 25%). Conclusion rAd-IFNα/Syn3 was well tolerated. It demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with HG NMIBC after BCG therapy who were unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal D Shore
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Daniel J Canter
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kenneth Ogan
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Lawrence I Karsh
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tracy M Downs
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Yair Lotan
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Robert L Grubb
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tracey L Krupski
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Michael E Woods
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Brant A Inman
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Alan Boyd
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - F Peter Treasure
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Gillian Gregory
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - David G Sawutz
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Seppo Yla-Herttuala
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Nigel R Parker
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Colin P N Dinney
- Neal D. Shore, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Daniel J. Canter, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA; Kenneth Ogan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Lawrence I. Karsh, The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO; Tracy M. Downs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Leonard G. Gomella, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Ashish M. Kamat and Colin P.N. Dinney, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Seth P. Lerner, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Yair Lotan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Robert S. Svatek, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Robert L. Grubb III, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Tracey L. Krupski, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Michael E. Woods and Matthew I. Milowsky, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Brant A. Inman, Duke University, Durham, NC; Alan Boyd, Alan Boyd Consultants, Cottenham; F. Peter Treasure, Peter Treasure Statistical Services, King's Lynn, United Kingdom; Gillian Gregory, David G. Sawutz, and Nigel R. Parker, FKD Therapies Oy; and Seppo Yla-Herttuala, A.I. Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Packiam VT, Lamm DL, Barocas DA, Trainer A, Fand B, Davis RL, Clark W, Kroeger M, Dumbadze I, Chamie K, Kader AK, Curran D, Gutheil J, Kuan A, Yeung AW, Steinberg GD. An open label, single-arm, phase II multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of CG0070 oncolytic vector regimen in patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Interim results. Urol Oncol 2017; 36:440-447. [PMID: 28755959 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES CG0070 is a replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus that targets bladder tumor cells through their defective retinoblastoma pathway. Prior reports of intravesical CG0070 have shown promising activity in patients with high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who previously did not respond to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). However, limited accrual has hindered analysis of efficacy, particularly for pathologic subsets. We evaluated interim results of a phase II trial for intravesical CG0070 in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who refused cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS At interim analysis (April 2017), 45 patients with residual high-grade Ta, T1, or carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) ± Ta/T1 had evaluable 6-month follow-up in this phase II single-arm multicenter trial (NCT02365818). All patients received at least 2 prior courses of intravesical therapy for CIS, with at least 1 being a course of BCG. Patients had either failed BCG induction therapy within 6 months or had been successfully treated with BCG with subsequent recurrence. Complete response (CR) at 6 months was defined as absence of disease on cytology, cystoscopy, and random biopsies. RESULTS Of 45 patients, there were 24 pure CIS, 8 CIS + Ta, 4 CIS + T1, 6 Ta, 3 T1. Overall 6-month CR (95% CI) was 47% (32%-62%). Considering 6-month CR for pathologic subsets, pure CIS was 58% (37%-78%), CIS ± Ta/T1 50% (33%-67%), and pure Ta/T1 33% (8%-70%). At 6 months, the single patient that progressed to muscle-invasive disease had Ta and T1 tumors at baseline. No patients with pure T1 had 6-month CR. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) at 6 months were most commonly urinary bladder spasms (36%), hematuria (28%), dysuria (25%), and urgency (22%). Immunologic treatment-related AEs included flu-like symptoms (12%) and fatigue (6%). Grade III treatment-related AEs included dysuria (3%) and hypotension (1.5%). There were no Grade IV/V treatment-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS This phase II study demonstrates that intravesical CG0070 yielded an overall 47% CR rate at 6 months for all patients and 50% for patients with CIS, with an acceptable level of toxicity for patients with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. There is a particularly strong response and limited progression in patients with pure CIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh T Packiam
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| | | | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - Andrew Trainer
- Adult Pediatric Urology & Urogynecology, P.C., Omaha, NE
| | | | - Ronald L Davis
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Karim Kader
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gary D Steinberg
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Long-term Survival Outcomes With Intravesical Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel for Recurrent Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer After Previous Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy. Urology 2017; 103:149-153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
26
|
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a highly prevalent disease and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and cost. Environmental or occupational exposures to carcinogens, especially tobacco, are the main risk factors for bladder cancer. Most bladder cancers are diagnosed after patients present with macroscopic haematuria, and cases are confirmed after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), which also serves as the first stage of treatment. Bladder cancer develops via two distinct pathways, giving rise to non-muscle-invasive papillary tumours and non-papillary (solid) muscle-invasive tumours. The two subtypes have unique pathological features and different molecular characteristics. Indeed, The Cancer Genome Atlas project identified genetic drivers of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) as well as subtypes of MIBC with distinct characteristics and therapeutic responses. For non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), intravesical therapies (primarily Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)) with maintenance are the main treatments to prevent recurrence and progression after initial TURBT; additional therapies are needed for those who do not respond to BCG. For localized MIBC, optimizing care and reducing morbidity following cystectomy are important goals. In metastatic disease, advances in our genetic understanding of bladder cancer and in immunotherapy are being translated into new therapies.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jancke G, Liedberg F, Aljabery F, Sherif A, Ströck V, Malmström PU, Hosseini-Aliabad A, Jahnson S. Intravesical instillations and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol 2017; 51:124-129. [PMID: 28351206 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1298156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of intravesical treatment and cancer-specific survival of patients with primary carcinoma in situ (CIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data acquisition was based on the Swedish National Registry of Urinary Bladder Cancer by selecting all patients with primary CIS. The analysis covered gender, age, hospital type and hospital volume. Intravesical treatment and death due to bladder cancer were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression and multivariate Cox analysis, respectively. RESULTS The study included 1041 patients (median age at diagnosis 72 years) with a median follow-up of 65 months. Intravesical instillation therapy was given to 745 patients (72%), and 138 (13%) died from bladder cancer during the observation period. Male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.17] and treatment at county (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.17-2.33), university (OR =2.12, 95% CI 1.48-3.03) or high-volume (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.75) hospitals were significantly associated with higher odds of intravesical instillations. The age category ≥80 years had a significantly lower chance of receiving intravesical therapy (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.74) and a significantly higher risk of dying from bladder cancer (hazard ratio = 3.03, 95% CI 1.71-5.35). CONCLUSION Significantly more frequent use of intravesical treatment of primary CIS was found for males and for patients treated at county, university and high-volume hospitals. Age ≥80 years was significantly related to less intravesical treatment and poorer cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Jancke
- a Department of Urology , Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, and Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University , Malmö , Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- a Department of Urology , Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, and Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University , Malmö , Sweden
| | - Firas Aljabery
- b Department of Urology , Linköping University Hospital , Linköping , Sweden
| | - Amir Sherif
- c Department of Urology , Norrland University Hospital , Umeå , Sweden
| | - Viveka Ströck
- d Department of Urology , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Göteborg , Sweden
| | - Per-Uno Malmström
- e Department of Urology , Uppsala Akademiska Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden
| | | | - Staffan Jahnson
- b Department of Urology , Linköping University Hospital , Linköping , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Kaasinen E, Palou J, Rouprêt M, van Rhijn BW, Shariat SF, Soukup V, Sylvester RJ, Zigeuner R. EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017; 71:447-461. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1330] [Impact Index Per Article: 190.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
29
|
Veeratterapillay R, Heer R, Johnson MI, Persad R, Bach C. High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-Therapy Options During Intravesical BCG Shortage. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17:68. [PMID: 27492610 PMCID: PMC4980405 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-016-0625-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the second commonest urinary tract malignancy with 70–80 % being non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) at diagnosis. Patients with high-risk NMIBC (T1/Tis, with high grade/G3, or CIS) represent a challenging group as they are at greater risk of recurrence and progression. Intravesical Bacilli Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is commonly used as first line therapy in this patient group but there is a current worldwide shortage. BCG has been shown to reduce recurrence in high-risk NMIBC and is more effective that other intravesical agents including mitomycin C, epirubicin, interferon-alpha and gemcitabine. Primary cystectomy offers a high change of cure in this cohort (80–90 %) and is a more radical treatment option which patients need to be counselled carefully about. Bladder thermotherapy and electromotive drug administration with mitomycin C are alternative therapies with promising short-term results although long-term follow-up data are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajan Veeratterapillay
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN, UK
| | - Rakesh Heer
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN, UK.
| | - Mark I Johnson
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Bristol Urology Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Christian Bach
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat E, Palou J, Rouprêt M, van Rhijn B, Shariat S, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Gontero P, Mostafid H. Reply to Harry Herr's Letter to the Editor re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Böhle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. Eur Urol 2016; 71:e173-e174. [PMID: 27939074 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, UPMC, Paris, France
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpétrière, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France; UPMC University Paris 06, GRC5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris, France
| | - Bas van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Clinic, Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Studies of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Packiam VT, Johnson SC, Steinberg GD. Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Intravesical treatments beyond Bacille Calmette-Guérin. Cancer 2016; 123:390-400. [PMID: 28112819 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Revised: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
An unmet need exists for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer for whom bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has failed and who seek further bladder-sparing approaches. This shortcoming poses difficult management dilemmas. This review explores previously investigated first-line intravesical therapies and discusses emerging second-line treatments for the heterogeneous group of patients for whom BCG has failed. The myriad of recently published and ongoing trials assessing novel salvage intravesical treatments offer promise to patients who both seek an effective cure and want to avoid radical surgery. However, these trials must carefully be contextualized by specific patient, tumor, and recurrence characteristics. As data continue to accumulate, there will potentially be a role for these agents as second-line or even first-line intravesical therapies. Cancer 2017;123:390-400. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh T Packiam
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Scott C Johnson
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Navai N, Benedict WF, Zhang G, Abraham A, Ainslie N, Shah JB, Grossman HB, Kamat AM, Dinney CPN. Phase 1b Trial to Evaluate Tissue Response to a Second Dose of Intravesical Recombinant Adenoviral Interferon α2b Formulated in Syn3 for Failures of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Therapy in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:4110-4114. [PMID: 27387678 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5300-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A phase 1b trial was conducted to evaluate the duration of interferon-alpha (IFNα) production after intravesical administration of recombinant adenovirus-mediated interferon α2b (Ad-IFN) formulated with the excipient Syn3. The primary aim was to determine whether a second instillation 3 days after initial treatment produced prolonged urinary IFN production. METHODS The study enrolled seven patients who experienced recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. Each treatment consisted of intravesical instillation of SCH721015 (Syn3) and Ad-IFN at a concentration of 3 × 1011 particles/mL to a total volume of 75 mL given on days 1 and 4. The patients were followed for 12 weeks, during which the magnitude and duration of gene transfer were determined by urine INFα levels. Drug efficacy was determined by cystoscopy and biopsy, and patients who had no recurrence at 12 weeks were eligible for a second course of treatment. RESULTS Seven patients were treated with an initial course (instillation on days 1 and 4). Two of the patients had a complete response at 12 weeks and received a second course of treatment. One patient remained without evidence of recurrence after a second course (total 24 weeks). One patient experienced a non-treatment-associated adverse event. Despite a transient rise in IFNα levels, sustained production was not demonstrated. CONCLUSION Previously, Ad-IFNα intravesical therapy has shown promising drug efficacy. A prior phase 1 trial with a single instillation compared similarly with the current study, suggesting that a second instillation is not necessary to achieve sufficient urinary IFNα levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William F Benedict
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guangcheng Zhang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alice Abraham
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nancy Ainslie
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay B Shah
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - H Barton Grossman
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Colin P N Dinney
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 1373, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, Hernández V, Espinós EL, Dunn J, Rouanne M, Neuzillet Y, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG, Gakis G, Ribal MJ. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 71:462-475. [PMID: 27375033 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1051] [Impact Index Per Article: 131.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Invasive bladder cancer is a frequently occurring disease with a high mortality rate despite optimal treatment. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Guidelines are updated yearly and provides information to optimise diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of this patient population. OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the EAU guidelines for physicians and patients confronted with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international multidisciplinary panel of bladder cancer experts reviewed and discussed the results of a comprehensive literature search of several databases covering all sections of the guidelines. The panel defined levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to an established classification system. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Epidemiology and aetiology of bladder cancer are discussed. The proper diagnostic pathway, including demands for pathology and imaging, is outlined. Several treatment options, including bladder-sparing treatments and combinations of treatment modalities (different forms of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) are described. Sequencing of these modalities is discussed. Potential indications and contraindications, such as comorbidity, are related to treatment choice. There is a new paragraph on organ-sparing approaches, both in men and in women, and on minimal invasive surgery. Recommendations for chemotherapy in fit and unfit patients are provided including second-line options. Finally, a follow-up schedule is provided. CONCLUSIONS The current summary of the EAU Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Guidelines provides an up-to-date overview of the available literature and evidence dealing with diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is an important disease with a high mortality rate. These updated guidelines help clinicians refine the diagnosis and select the appropriate therapy and follow-up for patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Thierry Lebret
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpetrière, UPMC, Paris, France
| | - Nigel C Cowan
- Radiology Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- University of Warwick, Cancer Research Unit, Coventry, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Harman Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Hernández
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - James Dunn
- Department of Urology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Haas CR, Barlow LJ, Badalato GM, DeCastro GJ, Benson MC, McKiernan JM. The Timing of Radical Cystectomy for bacillus Calmette-Guérin Failure: Comparison of Outcomes and Risk Factors for Prognosis. J Urol 2016; 195:1704-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R. Haas
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - LaMont J. Barlow
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Gina M. Badalato
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - G. Joel DeCastro
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Mitchell C. Benson
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - James M. McKiernan
- Herbert Irving Cancer Center and Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Morales A, Cohen Z. Mycobacterium phleicell wall-nucleic acid complex in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2016; 16:273-83. [DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1134483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
36
|
Packiam VT, Pearce SM, Steinberg GD. The role of mycobacterial cell wall nucleic acid complex in the treatment of bacillus Calmette-Guérin failures for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2016; 8:29-37. [PMID: 26834838 DOI: 10.1177/1756287215607818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) utilizes transurethral resection followed by adjuvant intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is the mainstay of adjuvant immunotherapy, but there are limited nonsurgical options for patients that fail this treatment. Mycobacterial cell wall nucleic acid complex (MCNA) is an immunotherapeutic agent utilized primarily after failure of intravesical BCG. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the published literature regarding MCNA. METHODS A literature review was performed and identified studies indexed in MEDLINE(®) related to utilization of MCNA for patients with NMIBC. RESULTS Two trials assessed the efficacy of MCNA in patients with NMIBC, comprising a total of 184 patients. Most patients had carcinoma in situ (CIS) with (26%) or without (52%) concomitant papillary tumors. A minority of patients had only papillary tumors (22%). Most patients (95%) previously received BCG or other intravesical therapy prior to receiving MCNA. In the largest available trial, 25% and 19% of patients had no evidence of residual cancer in 1 and 2 years following initiation of MCNA. A total of 2.3% of patients had adverse events (AEs) leading to delay or discontinuation of therapy and 66% of patients had mild drug-related AEs. CONCLUSION Based on analysis of available published data, MCNA offers a durable response for a small proportion of patients that have failed prior intravesical therapy. There still exists a large unmet need for nonsurgical treatment options for patients with NMIBC who have failed adjuvant intravesical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vignesh T Packiam
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave. MC-6038, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Shane M Pearce
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kamat AM, Sylvester RJ, Böhle A, Palou J, Lamm DL, Brausi M, Soloway M, Persad R, Buckley R, Colombel M, Witjes JA. Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1935-44. [PMID: 26811532 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.4070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) based on current literature and expert consensus of the International Bladder Cancer Group. METHODS We reviewed published trials, guidelines, meta-analyses, and reviews and provided recommendations on eligibility criteria, baseline evaluations, end points, study designs, comparators, clinically meaningful magnitude of effect, and sample size. RESULTS NMIBC trials must be designed to provide the most clinically relevant data for the specific risk category of interest (low, intermediate, or high). Specific eligibility criteria and baseline evaluations depend on the risk category being studied. For the population of patients for whom bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has failed, the type of failure (BCG unresponsive, refractory, relapsing, or intolerant) should be clearly defined to make comparisons across trials feasible. Single-arm designs may be relevant for the BCG-unresponsive population. Here, a clinically meaningful initial complete response rate (for carcinoma in situ) or recurrence-free rate (for papillary tumors) of at least 50% at 6 months, 30% at 12 months, and 25% at 18 months is recommended. For other risk levels, randomized superiority trial designs are recommended; noninferiority trials are to be used sparingly given the large sample size required. Placebo control is considered unethical for all intermediate- and high-risk strata; therefore, control arms should comprise the current guideline-recommended standard of care for the respective risk level. In general, trials should use time to recurrence or recurrence-free survival as the primary end point and time to progression, toxicity, disease-specific survival, and overall survival as potential secondary end points. Realistic efficacy thresholds should be set to ensure that novel therapies receive due review by regulatory bodies. CONCLUSION The International Bladder Cancer Group has developed formal recommendations regarding definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for NMIBC to encourage uniformity among studies in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish M Kamat
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas Böhle
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joan Palou
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Donald L Lamm
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maurizio Brausi
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Soloway
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Raj Persad
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Roger Buckley
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc Colombel
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Ashish M. Kamat, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Richard J. Sylvester, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Andreas Böhle, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany; Joan Palou, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Donald L. Lamm, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; Maurizio Brausi, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy; Mark Soloway, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Raj Persad, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Roger Buckley, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Marc Colombel, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; and J. Alfred Witjes, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ho PL, Williams SB, Kamat AM. Immune therapies in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2015; 16:5. [PMID: 25757877 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-014-0315-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) continues to be a challenging disease to manage. Treatment involves transurethral resection and, often, intravesical therapy. Appropriate patient selection, accurate staging, and morphological characterization are vital in risk-stratifying patients to those who would most benefit from receiving intravesical therapy. Bacillus of Calmette and Guérin (BCG) continues to be the first-line agent of choice for patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. Treatment should begin with the standard induction course of 6 weekly treatments. The inclusion of subsequent maintenance courses of BCG is imperative to optimal therapeutic response. While patients with intermediate-risk disease should receive 1 year of maintenance therapy, high-risk patients benefit from up to 3 years of maintenance therapy. BCG use should not be used in low-risk patients with de novo Ta, low-grade, solitary, <3-cm tumors. Conversely, patients with muscle-invasive disease should forgo intravesical immunotherapy and proceed directly to radical cystectomy. Cystectomy also should be considered in patients with multiple T1 tumors, T1 tumors located in difficult to resect locations, residual T1 on re-resection, and T1 with concomitant CIS. Although promising new immunotherapeutic agents, such as Urocidin, protein-based vaccines, and immune check point inhibitors are undergoing preclinical and clinical investigation, immunotherapy in bladder cancer remains largely reliant on intravesical BCG with surgical consolidation as the standard salvage treatment for patients with BCG failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip L Ho
- The University of Texas at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Patel S, Dinh T, Noah-Vanhoucke J, Rengarajan B, Mayo K, Clark PE, Kamat AM, Lee CT, Sexton WJ, Steinberg GD. Novel Simulation Model of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Platform for a Virtual Randomized Trial of Conservative Therapy vs. Cystectomy in BCG Refractory Patients. Bladder Cancer 2015; 1:143-150. [PMID: 27376114 PMCID: PMC4927810 DOI: 10.3233/blc-150020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: There have been no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical or economic benefit of mitomycin C intravesical therapy vs. radical cystectomy in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We used the Archimedes computational model to simulate RCT comparing radical cystectomy versus intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) therapy to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes for BCG-refractory NMIBC as well demonstrate the utility of computer based models to simulate a clinical trial. Methods: The Archimedes model was developed to generate a virtual population using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, other clinical trials, and expert opinions. Patients selected were diagnosed with NMIBC (<cT2 disease) who recurred or progressed despite BCG therapy and were randomized to 1) immediate radical cystectomy vs. 2) MMC induction intravesical therapy. Clinical (progression, overall survival, and disease specific survival) and economic outcomes were reported. Results: A total of 1300 virtual patients were evaluation. Progression to MIBC in the MMC treatment arm was 30% over the lifetime. Disease specific death at 5 years was 1.6% and 8.7% for the immediate cystectomy and MMC treatment arms respectively; while, overall death was 17.8% and 23.8% at 5 years. Over a 5-year period the average cost of immediate cystectomy was $64,675 vs $68,517 in the MMC arm. Conclusion: Immediate radical cystectomy after BCG failure for NMIBC has improved survival and is more cost-effective when compared to those undergoing MMC. Simulation of clinical trials using computational models similar to the Archimedes model can overcome shortcomings of real-world clinical trials and may prove useful in the face of current medical cost-conscious era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tuan Dinh
- Archimedes Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Peter E Clark
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Braunstein LZ, Shipley WU, James ND, Apolo AB, Efstathiou JA. Integrating chemotherapy and radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
41
|
Soria F, Milla P, Fiorito C, Pisano F, Sogni F, Di Marco M, Pagliarulo V, Dosio F, Gontero P. Efficacy and safety of a new device for intravesical thermochemotherapy in non-grade 3 BCG recurrent NMIBC: a phase I-II study. World J Urol 2015; 34:189-95. [PMID: 26026818 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1595-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report for the first time the activity and safety of Unithermia(®) (Elmedical Ltd, Hod-Hasharon, Israel), a novel device for administration of MMC-C with hyperthermia (HT), that employs conductive heating, in a series of non-grade 3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that failed Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). METHODS Patients with non-grade 3 NMIBC recurring after at least a full induction course of BCG were eligible for this phase I-II prospective single-arm study. Six weekly instillations with Unithermia(®) were scheduled following complete TUR. Primary end points were treatment safety and response rate (RR), and the latter defined as the absence of any unfavourable outcome at 12 months. Any grade 3 and/or muscle-invasive (T > 1) recurrence was considered disease progression. Kaplan-Meier estimation of the time to recurrence and progression, cancer-specific survival and overall survival was taken as secondary end points. RESULTS Thirty-four eligible patients entered the study between January 2009 and April 2011. RR was documented in 20/34 (59%). Among the 14/34 (41%) non-responders, four developed G3 disease, one developed carcinoma in situ, and one progressed to muscle-invasive bladder cancer, with an overall 18% progression rate at 1 year. At a median follow-up of 41 months, recurrence and progression rates were 35.3 and 23.5%, respectively. Toxicity did not go beyond grade 2 except in five cases. CONCLUSIONS Initial experience with MMC-HT with Unithermia(®) showed an interesting activity and safety profile in non-grade 3 NMIBC recurring after BCG, suggesting a role as second-line therapy in this selected subgroup of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, C.so Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Milla
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Fiorito
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, C.so Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, C.so Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo Sogni
- Urology Clinic, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | | | - Franco Dosio
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, C.so Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Casey RG, Catto JW, Cheng L, Cookson MS, Herr H, Shariat S, Witjes JA, Black PC. Diagnosis and Management of Urothelial Carcinoma In Situ of the Lower Urinary Tract: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2015; 67:876-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
43
|
Morales A, Herr H, Steinberg G, Given R, Cohen Z, Amrhein J, Kamat AM. Efficacy and Safety of MCNA in Patients with Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence and Progression after Failed Treatment with bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Urol 2015; 193:1135-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harry Herr
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Zvi Cohen
- Bioniche Therapeutics Corp., Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada
| | - John Amrhein
- Kingston and McDougall Scientific Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashish M. Kamat
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Serretta V, Sommatino F, Gesolfo CS, Franco V, Cicero G, Allegro R. Intravesical chemotherapy for intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer recurring after a first cycle of intravesical adjuvant therapy. Urol Ann 2015; 7:21-5. [PMID: 25657538 PMCID: PMC4310111 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.148582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: The therapeutic strategy in intermediate risk (IR) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurring after intravesical therapy (IT) is not well defined. Most patients are usually retreated by Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy (ICH) given at recurrence after the first cycle of ICH in IR-NMIBC recurring 6 months or later. Settings and Design: Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ICH given after previous IT. Materials and Methods: The clinical files of IR-NMIBC patients recurring later than 6 months after transurethral resection (TUR) and IT and retreated by IT were reviewed. The patients should be at intermediate risk both initially and at the first recurrence. BCG should have been given at full dose. Cytology and cystoscopy were performed 3 monthly for 2 years and then 6 monthly. Statistical Analysis: The RFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the differences between treatment groups were compared by log-rank test. Mann Whitney U-test was used to compare the parameters’ distribution for median time to recurrence. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: The study included 179 patients. The first IT was ICH in 146 (81.6%) and BCG in 33 (18.4%), re-IT was ICH in 112 (62.6%) and BCG in 67 (37.4%) patients. Median time to recurrence was 18 and 16 months after first and second IT (P = 0.32). At 3 years, 24 (35.8%) and 49 (43.8%) patients recurred after BCG and ICH, respectively (P = 0.90). No difference in RFS was found between BCG and ICH given after a first cycle of ICH (P = 0.23). Conclusions: Re-treatment with ICH could represent a legitimate option to BCG in patients harboring IR-NMIBC recurring after TUR and previous ICH. Prospective trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Serretta
- Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Sommatino
- Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Cristina Scalici Gesolfo
- Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Franco
- Department of Sciences for Health Promotion, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cicero
- Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosalinda Allegro
- Department of Statistics, Gruppo Studi Tumori Urologici (GSTU) Foundation, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Holla S, Ghorpade DS, Singh V, Bansal K, Balaji KN. Mycobacterium bovis BCG promotes tumor cell survival from tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis. Mol Cancer 2014; 13:210. [PMID: 25208737 PMCID: PMC4174669 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increased incidence of lung cancer among pulmonary tuberculosis patients suggests mycobacteria-induced tumorigenic response in the host. The alveolar epithelial cells, candidate cells that form lung adenocarcinoma, constitute a niche for mycobacterial replication and infection. We thus explored the possible mechanism of M. bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-assisted tumorigenicity in type II epithelial cells, human lung adenocarcinoma A549 and other cancer cells. Methods Cancer cell lines originating from lung, colon, bladder, liver, breast, skin and cervix were treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in presence or absence of BCG infection. p53, COP1 and sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling markers were determined by immunoblotting and luciferase assays, and quantitative real time PCR was done for p53-responsive pro-apoptotic genes and SHH signaling markers. MTT assays and Annexin V staining were utilized to study apoptosis. Gain- and loss-of-function approaches were used to investigate the role for SHH and COP1 signaling during apoptosis. A549 xenografted mice were used to validate the contribution of BCG during TNF-α treatment. Results Here, we show that BCG inhibits TNF-α-mediated apoptosis in A549 cells via downregulation of p53 expression. Substantiating this observation, BCG rescued A549 xenografts from TNF-α-mediated tumor clearance in nude mice. Furthermore, activation of SHH signaling by BCG induced the expression of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, COP1. SHH-driven COP1 targeted p53, thereby facilitating downregulation of p53-responsive pro-apoptotic genes and inhibition of apoptosis. Similar effects of BCG could be shown for HCT116, T24, MNT-1, HepG2 and HELA cells but not for HCT116 p53-/- and MDA-MB-231 cells. Conclusion Our results not only highlight possible explanations for the coexistence of pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer but also address probable reasons for failure of BCG immunotherapy of cancers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1476-4598-13-210) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
46
|
Slater SE, Patel P, Viney R, Foster M, Porfiri E, James ND, Montgomery B, Bryan RT. The effects and effectiveness of electromotive drug administration and chemohyperthermia for treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96:415-9. [PMID: 25198970 PMCID: PMC4474190 DOI: 10.1308/003588414x13946184901001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preliminary studies show that device assisted intravesical therapies appear more effective than passive diffusion intravesical therapy for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in specific settings, and phase III studies are now being conducted. Consequently, we have undertaken a non-systematic review with the objective of describing the scientific basis and mechanisms of action of electromotive drug administration (EMDA) and chemohyperthermia (CHT). METHODS PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were searched to source evidence for this non-systematic review. Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated. Publications regarding the scientific basis and mechanisms of action of EMDA and CHT were identified, as well as clinical studies to date. RESULTS EMDA takes advantage of three phenomena: iontophoresis, electro-osmosis and electroporation. It has been found to reduce recurrence rates in NMIBC patients and has been proposed as an addition or alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy in the treatment of high risk NMIBC. CHT improves the efficacy of mitomycin C by three mechanisms: tumour cell cytotoxicity, altered tumour blood flow and localised immune responses. Fewer studies have been conducted with CHT than with EMDA but they have demonstrated utility for increasing disease-free survival, especially in patients who have previously failed BCG therapy. CONCLUSIONS It is anticipated that EMDA and CHT will play important roles in the management of NMIBC in the future. Techniques of delivery should be standardised, and there is a need for more randomised controlled trials to evaluate the benefits of the treatments alongside quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - M Foster
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - E Porfiri
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nishiyama N, Kitamura H, Hotta H, Takahashi A, Yanase M, Itoh N, Tachiki H, Miyao N, Matsukawa M, Kunishima Y, Taguchi K, Masumori N. Construction of predictive models for cancer-specific survival of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: results from a multicenter retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44:1101-8. [PMID: 25139163 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyu119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to clarify the prognostic factors and to validate the bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure classification advocated by Nieder et al. in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who had intravesical recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. METHODS Data from 402 patients who received intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy between January 1990 and November 2011 were collected from 10 institutes. Among these patients, 187 with bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure were analyzed for this study. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (15.5%) were diagnosed with progression at the first recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Eighteen (62.1%) of them died of bladder cancer. A total of 158 patients were diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer at the first recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Of them, 23 (14.6%) underwent radical cystectomy. No patients who underwent radical cystectomy died of bladder cancer during the follow-up. On multivariate analysis of the 135 patients with bladder preservation, the independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival were age (≥70 [P = 0.002]), tumor size (≥3 cm [P = 0.015]) and the Nieder classification (bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory [P < 0.001]). In a subgroup analysis, the estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates in the groups with no positive, one positive and two to three positive factors were 100, 93.4 and 56.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage progression at the first recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy had poor prognoses. Three prognostic factors for predicting survival were identified and used to categorize patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin into three risk groups based on the number of prognostic factors in each one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotaka Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo
| | - Hiroshi Hotta
- Department of Urology, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa
| | | | - Masahiro Yanase
- Department of Urology, Sunagawa City Medical Center, Sunagawa
| | - Naoki Itoh
- Department of Urology, NTT East Japan Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo
| | - Hitoshi Tachiki
- Department of Urology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital, Muroran
| | - Noriomi Miyao
- Department of Urology, Muroran City General Hospital, Muroran
| | | | - Yasuharu Kunishima
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido Social Work Association Obihiro Hospital, Obihiro
| | - Keisuke Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Oji General Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yates DR. T1G3 bladder cancer and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin: tell me something we don't know. Eur Urol 2014; 67:83-84. [PMID: 25109573 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David R Yates
- Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bladder cancer: the curious case of a not so rare disease. Curr Opin Urol 2014; 24:483-6. [PMID: 24992244 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
van Lingen AV, Arends TJH, Witjes JA. Expert review: an update in current and developing intravesical therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 13:1257-68. [PMID: 24168049 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2013.852474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a highly prevalent disease and recurrences, after initial therapy, are common. Consequently, the healthcare costs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are high. Despite a primary adequate response to adjuvant intravesical treatment, many patients suffer from recurrences, and some even from progression. To date, cystectomy remains the only option for those non-responding patients with high risk of recurrence and progression. Mainly because outcome after progression, in this group, is poor. Therefore, new intravesical therapies are needed. Moreover, new accurate and individual parameters, to distinguish responder from non-responders, will provide additional benefit in clinical decision-making. In this review, current diagnostics and therapies will be discussed. In addition, we will elucidate developing therapies in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna V van Lingen
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|