Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting: “Time to Get the Head Out of the Sand”

Nephrometry and cumulative morbidity after partial nephrectomy: A standardized assessment of complications in the context of PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores

BACKGROUND

Nephrometry scores aid in clinical decision-making, yet evidence is scarce regarding their impact on cumulative morbidity following partial nephrectomy (PN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, monocentric study of 122 patients with suspicious renal masses undergoing open or robot-assisted PN between January 2019 and August 2020. Morbidity assessment followed European Association of Urology guidelines on complication reporting. 30-d complications were extracted using a PN-specific catalog, were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) values were calculated. The impact of nephrometry on cumulative morbidity was evaluated by (1) comparing morbidity estimates between Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA)/R.E.N.A.L. complexity groups, (2) by Pearson's correlation between nephrometry scores and CCI®, and (3) by multivariable regression models using any 30-d complication and 30-d CCI® as endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 122 patients, 101 (83%) underwent open and 21 (17%) robot-assisted PN. Median PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were 9 (interquartile range, IQR 8-10) and 8 (IQR 6-9), respectively. Of 218 complications in 92 patients (75%), the majority was classified as minor (CDC grade ≤IIIa). Median 30-d CCI® was 8.7 (IQR 0.50-15). There was a small positive correlation between PADUA or R.E.N.A.L. score with CCI® (all P ≤ 0.026), explaining 4.7% and 4.1% of the variation in CCI®, respectively. After adjustment, nephrometry scores were associated with any 30-d complication and the CCI® (all P ≤ 0.011). PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. high complexity tumors were positively associated with both morbidity endpoints compared to low complexity tumors (all P ≤ 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

At a referral center, PN may be safely performed, even if morbidity assessment follows a strict protocol. Nephrometry risk classification does only marginally translate into clinical relevant differences regarding short-term complications. Thus, nephron-sparing surgery should not be withheld from patients with high complexity renal masses.

Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of postoperative surgical complications in patients treated with partial nephrectomy: a prospective multicentre observational study (the RECORd 2 project)

OBJECTIVE

To identify meaningful predictors and to develop a nomogram of postoperative surgical complications in patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 4308 consecutive patients who had surgical treatment for renal tumours, between 2013 and 2016, at 26 Italian urological centres (RECORd 2 project). A multivariable logistic regression for surgical complications was performed. A nomogram was created from the multivariable model. Internal validation processes were performed using bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions.

RESULTS

Overall, 2584 patients who underwent PN were evaluated for the final analyses. The median (interquartile [IQR]) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2 (2-3). In all, 72.4% of patients had clinical T1a (cT1a) stage tumours. The median (IQR) Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score was 7 (6-8). Overall, 34.3%, 27.7%, 38% of patients underwent open PN (OPN), laparoscopic PN (LPN), and robot-assisted PN (RAPN). Overall and major postoperative surgical complications were recorded in 10.2% and 2.5% of patients, respectively. At multivariable analysis, age, ASA score, cT2 vs cT1a stage, PADUA score, preoperative anaemia, OPN and LPN vs RAPN, were significant predictive factors of postoperative surgical complications. We used these variables to construct a nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative surgical complications. At decision curve analysis, the nomogram led to superior outcomes for any decision associated with a threshold probability of >5%.

CONCLUSION

Several clinical predictors have been associated with postoperative surgical complications after PN. We used this information to develop and internally validate a nomogram to predict such risk.

Impact of Implementation of Standardized Criteria in the Assessment of Complication Reporting After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

The definition of a surgical complication still lacks standardization, hampering evaluation of surgical performance in this regard. Over the years, efforts to address this issue have been carried out to improve reporting of outcomes. In 2012, the European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a standardized reporting tool for urological complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of those recommendations on complication reporting for patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). A comprehensive systematic review of all English language publications on RPN was carried out. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality guidelines in evaluating articles retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (January 1, 2000 to October 31, 2016; updated June 2017). The quality of reporting and grading complications was assessed according to the EAU recommendations. Temporal comparison revealed an improvement in outcome reporting in terms of mortality rates and causes of death (p=0.05), definition of complications (p<0.001), procedure-specific complications (p=0.02), severity grade (p<0.001), postoperative complications presented by grade/complication type (p<0.001), and risk factors (p<0.001). Our analysis demonstrates an improvement in complication reporting and grading after the EAU recommendation on RPN. PATIENT SUMMARY: Complications are unexpected events that could negatively impact a patient's outcomes after surgery, but there is no agreement on the definition and reporting of complications. In 2012, the European Association of Urology proposed a standardized reporting tool for urological complications. This study shows an improvement in the way physicians report complications after robotic partial nephrectomy. The results underline the importance of standardization in medicine to improve clinical research.