1
|
van der Graaf SH, Hagens MJ, Veerman H, Roeleveld TA, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Wit EMK, W J M Wouters M, van der Mierden S, van Moorselaar RJA, Beerlage HP, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. A Systematic Review on the Impact of Quality Assurance Programs on Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00048-8. [PMID: 38631992 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The implementation of quality assurance programs (QAPs) within urological practice has gained prominence; yet, their impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains uncertain. This paper aims to systematically review the current literature regarding the implementation of QAPs and their impact on outcomes after robot-assisted RP, laparoscopic RP, and open prostatectomy, collectively referred to as RP. METHODS A systematic Embase, Medline (OvidSP), and Scopus search was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) process, on January 12, 2024. Studies were identified and included if these covered implementation of QAPs and their impact on outcomes after RP. QAPs were defined as any intervention seeking quality improvement through critically reviewing, analyzing, and discussing outcomes. Included studies were assessed critically using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, with results summarized narratively. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Ten included studies revealed two methodological strategies: periodic performance feedback and surgical video assessments. Despite conceptual variability, QAPs improved outcomes consistently (ie, surgical margins, urine continence, erectile function, and hospital readmissions). Of the two strategies, video assessments better identified suboptimal surgical practice and technical errors. Although the extent of quality improvements did not appear to correlate with the frequency of QAPs, there was an apparent correlation with whether or not outcomes were evaluated collectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Current findings suggest that QAPs have a positive impact on outcomes after RP. Caution in interpretation due to limited data is advised. More extensive research is required to explore how conceptual differences impact the extent of quality improvements. PATIENT SUMMARY In this paper, we review the available scientific literature regarding the implementation of quality assurance programs and their impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The included studies offered substantial support for the implementation of quality assurance programs as an incentive to improve the quality of care continuously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H van der Graaf
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marinus J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton A Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M K Wit
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stevie van der Mierden
- Scientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Jeroen A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duwe G, Boehm K, Becker G, Ruckes C, Sparwasser P, Haack M, Dotzauer R, Thomas A, Mager R, Tsaur I, Neumann CCM, Feick G, Carl G, Brandt MP, Haferkamp A, Höfner T. Individualized center-based analysis of urinary and sexual functional outcome after radical prostatectomy based on the prostate cancer outcome study: a post hoc pathway to patient outcome measurement analysis for quality improvement. World J Urol 2024; 42:236. [PMID: 38619659 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04950-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluate differences of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) based urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RPE) based on perioperative, surgical, and patient-specific characteristics in a large European academic urology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS All men enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Outcome Study (PCO) study who were treated with RPE between 2017 and 2021 completed EPIC-26 information surveys before and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data of our institution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between individual surgeons, patient characteristics, patient clinical data, and their urinary continence and sexual function. RESULTS In total, data of 429 men were analyzed: unstratified mean (SD) EPIC-26 domain score for urinary function decreased from 93.3 (0.7) to 60.4 (1.5) one year after RPE, respectively for sexual function from 64.95 (1.6) to 23.24 (1.1). Patients with preoperative adequate urinary function (EPIC-26 score > 80) reported significantly different mean urinary function scores between 53.35 (28.88) and 66.25 (25.15), p= 0.001, stratified by surgeons experience. On binary logistic regression analyses, only nerve sparing techniques (OR: 1,83, 95% CI: 1.01;3.21; p = 0.045) and low body mass index (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.85;0.99, p= 0.032) predicted adequate postoperative urinary function. CONCLUSIONS The results show how using provider-specific data from a larger cohort study enables to develop institution-specific analysis for functional outcomes after RPE. These models can be used for internal quality improvement as well as enhanced and provider-specific patient communication and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Duwe
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Katharina Boehm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav-Carus, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gerrit Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials Mainz, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Sparwasser
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haack
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Dotzauer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anita Thomas
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rene Mager
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christopher C M Neumann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Feick
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Günter Carl
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maximilian Peter Brandt
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Höfner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Fadingerstrasse 1, 4020, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lingard MCH, Teo Y, Frampton CMA, Hooper GJ. Effect of surgeon-specific feedback on surgical outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:47-56. [PMID: 37962076 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeon-specific outcome reporting provides an opportunity for quality assurance and improved surgical results. It is becoming increasingly prevalent and remains contentious amongst surgeons. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the extent to which published literature supports the concept that feedback of surgeon-level outcomes reduces morbidity and/or mortality. No systematic reviews have previously been completed on this subject. METHODS Medline and Embase were systematically searched for studies published prior to the 1st of January 2022. Feedback was defined as a summary of clinical performance over a specified period of time provided in written, electronic or verbal format. Studies were required to provide surgeon-specific feedback to multiple individual consultant surgeons with the primary purpose being to determine if feedback improved outcomes. Primary outcome(s) needed to relate to surgical outcomes as opposed to process measures only. All surgical specialties and procedures were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included in the review, traversing a wide range of specialties and procedures. Sixteen were non-randominsed and one randomized. Fifteen were before and after studies. The balance of the non-randomized studies support the concept that provision of surgeon-specific feedback can improve surgical outcomes, while the single randomized study suggests feedback may not be effective. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review supports the use of surgeon-level feedback to improve outcomes. The strength of this finding is limited by reliance on before and after studies, further randomized studies on this subject would be insightful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan C H Lingard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Yahsze Teo
- Te Whatu Ora - Waitaha Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | | | - Gary J Hooper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dinneen E, Kasivisvanathan V, Giganti F, Allen C, Shaw G, Punwani S. Re: Multiparametric MRI is not sufficient for prostate cancer staging: A single institutional experience validated by a multi-institutional regional collaborative. Thenappan Chandrasekar, Andrew Denisenko, Vasil Mico and Colleagues. Urological Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 41 (2023) 355.e1-355.e8. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:18-19. [PMID: 37968168 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Dinneen
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London, NW1 2BU, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chao PP, Koea JB, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Du J, Hill AG, Srinivasa S. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Aotearoa New Zealand: equity, quality, and workforce. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2789-2791. [PMID: 37855379 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip Pinhao Chao
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Barnes Koea
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
- Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Urology, Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jason Du
- Department of Urology, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Graham Hill
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sanket Srinivasa
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schepens MH, van Hooff ML, van der Galiën O, Ziedses des Plantes CM, Somford DM, van Leeuwen PJ, Busstra MB, Repping S, Wouters MW, van Limbeek J. Does Centralization of Radical Prostatectomy Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence? EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 58:47-54. [PMID: 38152486 PMCID: PMC10751543 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background On the basis of previous analyses of the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), the hospital RP volume threshold in the Netherlands was gradually increased from 20 per year in 2017, to 50 in 2018 and 100 from 2019 onwards. Objective To evaluate the impact of hospital RP volumes on the incidence and risk of UI after RP (RP-UI). Design setting and participants Patients who underwent RP during 2016-2020 were identified in the claims database of the largest health insurance company in the Netherlands. Incontinence was defined as an insurance claim for ≥1 pads/d. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The relationship between hospital RP volume (HV) and RP-UI was assessed via multivariable analysis adjusted for age, comorbidity, postoperative radiotherapy, and lymph node dissection. Results and limitations RP-UI incidence nationwide and by RP volume category did not decrease significantly during the study period, and 5-yr RP-UI rates varied greatly among hospitals (19-85%). However, low-volume hospitals (≤120 RPs/yr) had a higher percentage of patients with RP-UI and higher variation in comparison to high-volume hospitals (>120 RPs/yr). In comparison to hospitals with low RP volumes throughout the study period, the risk of RP-UI was 29% lower in hospitals shifting from the low-volume to the high-volume category (>120 RPs/yr) and 52% lower in hospitals with a high RP volume throughout the study period (>120 RPs/yr for 5 yr). Conclusions A focus on increasing hospital RP volumes alone does not seem to be sufficient to reduce the incidence of RP-UI, at least in the short term. Measurement of outcomes, preferably per surgeon, and the introduction of quality assurance programs are recommended. Patient summary In the Netherlands, centralization of surgery to remove the prostate (RP) because of cancer has not yet improved the occurrence of urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery. Hospitals performing more than 120 RP operations per year had better UI outcomes. However, there was a big difference in UI outcomes between hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike H.J. Schepens
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Healthcare Strategy and Innovation, Cirka BV, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda L. van Hooff
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Onno van der Galiën
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Zilveren Kruis Health Insurance, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | - Diederik M. Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B. Busstra
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd Repping
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W.J.M. Wouters
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques van Limbeek
- Department of Medical Advice, Zilveren Kruis Health Insurance, Zeist, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ninivaggi A, Guzzi F, Degennaro A, Ricapito A, Bettocchi C, Busetto GM, Sanguedolce F, Milillo P, Selvaggio O, Cormio L, Carrieri G, Falagario UG. External Validation of the IMPROD-MRI Volumetric Model to Predict the Utility of Systematic Biopsies at the Time of Targeted Biopsy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5748. [PMID: 37685815 PMCID: PMC10488903 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to validate externally a nomogram that relies on MRI volumetric parameters and clinical data to determine the need for a standard biopsy in addition to a target biopsy for men with suspicious prostate MRI findings. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 469 biopsy-naïve men who underwent prostate biopsies. These biopsies were guided by pre-biopsy multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) and were performed at two different institutions. We included men with a PIRADSsv 2.1 score from 3 to 5. Each patient underwent both an MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy of identified MRI-suspicious lesions and a systematic biopsy according to our protocol. The lesion volume percentage was determined as the proportion of cancer volume on MRI relative to the entire prostate volume. The study's outcomes were iPCa (Gleason Grade Group 1) and csPCa (Gleason Grade Group > 1). We evaluated the model's performance using AUC decision curve analyses and a systematic analysis of model-derived probability cut-offs in terms of the potential to avoid diagnosing iPCa and to accurately diagnose csPCa. Results: The nomogram includes age, PSA value, prostate volume, PIRADSsv 2.1 score, percentage of MRI-suspicious lesion volume, and lesion location. AUC was determined to be 0.73. By using various nomogram cut-off thresholds (ranging from 5% to 30%), it was observed that 19% to 58% of men could potentially avoid undergoing standard biopsies. In this scenario, the model might miss 0% to 10% of diagnosis of csPCa and could prevent identifying 6% to 31% of iPCa cases. These results are in line with findings from the multi-institutional external validation study based on the IMPROD trial (n = 122) and the MULTI-IMPROD trial (n = 262). According to DCA, the use of this nomogram led to an increased overall net clinical benefit when the threshold probability exceeded 10%. Conclusions: This study supports the potential value of a model relying on MRI volumetric measurements for selecting individuals with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who would benefit from undergoing a standard biopsy in addition to a targeted biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Ninivaggi
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | - Francesco Guzzi
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | - Alessio Degennaro
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
- Department of Urology, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, 76123 Andria, Italy
| | - Anna Ricapito
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | - Carlo Bettocchi
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
- Andrology Unit, Department of Urology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | | | - Paola Milillo
- Department of Radiology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Oscar Selvaggio
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
- Department of Urology, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, 76123 Andria, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy (U.G.F.)
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coelho FMA, Amaral LTW, Mitsutake LKN, Mussi TC, Baroni RH. Quality assessment of prostate MRI by PI-QUAL score: Inter-reader agreement and impact on prostate cancer local staging at 3 Tesla. Eur J Radiol 2023; 165:110921. [PMID: 37336037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score impacts prostate cancer (PCa) staging on MRI. The secondary goal was to test inter-reader agreement among radiologists experienced in prostate imaging. METHOD A retrospective, single-center study with patients who underwent 3 Tesla prostate MRI scans and were submitted to radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2018 and November 2021 and were eligible for our study. Extraprostatic extension (EPE) data were collected from original MR reports (EPEm) and pathological reports of RP specimens (EPEp). Three expert prostate radiologists (ESUR/ESUI criteria R1, R2, R3) independently evaluated all MRI exams according to PI-QUAL score for image quality (1 to 5; 1: poor, 5: excellent), blinded to original imaging reports and clinical data. We studied the diagnostic performance of MRI using pooled data from PI-QUAL scores (≤3 vs. ≥4). We also performed univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the PI-QUAL score impact on local PCa staging. Cohen's K and Tau-b Kendall tests were used to assess the inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL score, T2WI, DWI, and DCE. RESULTS Our final cohort included 146 patients, of which 27.4% presented EPE on pathology. We observed no impact of imaging quality on accuracy for EPE prediction: AUC of 0.750 (95% CI 0.26-1) for PI-QUAL ≤ 3 and 0.705 (95% CI 0.618-0.793) for PI-QUAL ≥ 4. The multivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation of EPEm (OR 3.25, p 0.001) and ISUP grade group (OR 1.89, p 0.012) to predict EPEp. The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (0.539 for R1-R2, 0.522 for R2-R3, and 0.694 for R1-R3). CONCLUSION Our clinical impact evaluation showed no direct correlation between MRI quality by PI-QUAL score and accuracy in detecting EPE in patients undergoing RP. Additionally, we had moderate to a substantial inter-reader agreement for the PI-QUAL score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucas Tadashi Wada Amaral
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. 627 Albert Einstein Ave. Sao Paulo, SP 05652-900, Brazil.
| | - Leonardo Kenji Nesi Mitsutake
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. 627 Albert Einstein Ave. Sao Paulo, SP 05652-900, Brazil.
| | - Thais Caldara Mussi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. 627 Albert Einstein Ave. Sao Paulo, SP 05652-900, Brazil.
| | - Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. 627 Albert Einstein Ave. Sao Paulo, SP 05652-900, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tatenuma T, Ebara S, Kawase M, Sasaki T, Ikehata Y, Nakayama A, Toide M, Yoneda T, Sakaguchi K, Teishima J, Inoue T, Kitamura H, Saito K, Koga F, Urakami S, Koie T, Makiyama K. Association of hospital volume with perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. BMC Urol 2023; 23:14. [PMID: 36721169 PMCID: PMC9887802 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01178-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective multicenter cohort study investigated the association of hospital volume with perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS We collected the clinical data of patients who underwent RARP at eight institutions in Japan between September 2012 and August 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment site-high- and non-high-volume hospitals. We defined a high-volume hospital as one where RARP was performed for more than 100 cases per year. RESULTS After excluding patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, a total of 2753 patients were included in this study. In the high-volume hospital group, console time and estimated blood loss were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than that of the non-high-volume hospital group. However, the continence rate at 3 months after RARP, positive surgical margins, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-relapse-free survival showed no significant differences between the two groups. Furthermore, the console time was significantly shorter after 100 cases in the non-high-volume hospital group but not in the high-volume hospital group. CONCLUSIONS A higher hospital volume was significantly associated with shorter console time and less estimated blood loss. However, oncological outcomes and early continence recovery appear to be comparable regardless of the hospital volume in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Tatenuma
- grid.470126.60000 0004 1767 0473Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawaku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360004 Japan
| | - Shin Ebara
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- grid.256342.40000 0004 0370 4927Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- grid.260026.00000 0004 0372 555XDepartment of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ikehata
- grid.267346.20000 0001 2171 836XDepartment of Urology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Akinori Nakayama
- grid.416093.9Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Masahiro Toide
- grid.415479.aDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Yoneda
- grid.415466.40000 0004 0377 8408Department of Urology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Kazushige Sakaguchi
- grid.410813.f0000 0004 1764 6940Department of Urology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Teishima
- grid.257022.00000 0000 8711 3200Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- grid.260026.00000 0004 0372 555XDepartment of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- grid.267346.20000 0001 2171 836XDepartment of Urology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Saito
- grid.416093.9Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- grid.415479.aDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Urakami
- grid.410813.f0000 0004 1764 6940Department of Urology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- grid.256342.40000 0004 0370 4927Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Makiyama
- grid.470126.60000 0004 1767 0473Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawaku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360004 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pham MN, Ko OS, Huang R, Vo AX, Tsai KP, Lai JD, Hudnall MT, Halpern JA, Meeks JJ, Benson J, Soares R, Kim R, Bilimoria KY, Stulberg JJ, Auffenberg GB. An Evaluation of Peer-Rated Surgical Skill and its Relationship With Detrusor Muscle Sampling in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. Urology 2022; 169:134-140. [PMID: 36049631 PMCID: PMC10099284 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the reliability of peer-review of TURBT videos as a means to evaluate surgeon skill and its relationship to detrusor sampling. METHODS Urologists from an academic health system submitted TURBT videos in 2019. Ten blinded peers evaluated each surgeon's performance using a 10-item scoring instrument to quantify surgeon skill. Normalized composite skill scores for each surgeon were calculated using peer ratings. For surgeons submitting videos, we retrospectively reviewed all TURBT pathology results (2018-2019) to assess surgeon-specific detrusor sampling. A hierarchical logistic regression model was fit to evaluate the association between skill and detrusor sampling, adjusting for patient and surgeon factors. RESULTS Surgeon skill scores and detrusor sampling rates were determined for 13 surgeons performing 245 TURBTs. Skill scores varied from -6.0 to 5.1 [mean: 0; standard deviation (SD): 2.40]. Muscle was sampled in 72% of cases, varying considerably across surgeons (mean: 64.5%; SD: 30.7%). Among 8 surgeons performing >5 TURBTs during the study period, adjusted detrusor sampling rate was associated with sending separate deep specimens (odds ratio [OR]: 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.81, P = .045) but not skill (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.57-1.17, P = .191). CONCLUSION Surgeon skill was not associated with detrusor sampling, suggesting there may be other drivers of variability of detrusor sampling in TURBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh N Pham
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Oliver S Ko
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Reiping Huang
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Amanda X Vo
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Kyle P Tsai
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeremy D Lai
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Matthew T Hudnall
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua A Halpern
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jonas Benson
- Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL; Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital, Geneva, IL; UroPartners LLC, Winfield, IL
| | - Ricardo Soares
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine Kishwaukee Hospital, DeKalb, IL
| | - Ronald Kim
- Northwestern Medicine Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest, IL; UroPartners LLC, Lake Forest, IL
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jonah J Stulberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aning J. The pursuit of excellence. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:351-352. [PMID: 36281500 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2137231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Aning
- Consultant Urological Surgeon and Honorary Associate Professor, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aggarwal A, Han L, van der Geest S, Lewis D, Lievens Y, Borras J, Jayne D, Sullivan R, Varkevisser M, van der Meulen J. Health service planning to assess the expected impact of centralising specialist cancer services on travel times, equity, and outcomes: a national population-based modelling study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1211-1220. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00398-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
13
|
Haapiainen H, Kaipia A, Murtola T, Seikkula H, Seppänen M, Jämsä P, Raitanen M. 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of multicentre study. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:176-181. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2075458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Haapiainen
- Department of Urology, The Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Antti Kaipia
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Teemu Murtola
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Heikki Seikkula
- Department of Urology, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Marjo Seppänen
- Department of Urology, Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland
| | - Pyry Jämsä
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mika Raitanen
- Department of Urology, The Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia, Seinäjoki, Finland
- Department of Urology, TAYS Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dinneen E, Allen C, Strange T, Heffernan-Ho D, Banjeglav J, Lindsay J, Mulligan JP, Briggs T, Nathan S, Sridhar A, Grierson J, Haider A, Panayi C, Patel D, Freeman A, Aning J, Persad R, Ahmad I, Dutto L, Oakley N, Ambrosi A, Parry T, Kasivisvanathan V, Giganti F, Shaw G, Punwani S. Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1057. [PMID: 35626214 PMCID: PMC9139507 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in the pre-operative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of mpMRI to accurately predict PCa extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on a side-specific basis using a risk-stratified 5-point Likert scale. This study also aimed to assess the influence of mpMRI scan quality on diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: We included 124 men who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) as part of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study at our centre. Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed mpMRI blinded to RP pathology and assigned a Likert score (1-5) for EPE on each side of the prostate. Each scan was also ascribed a Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for assessing the quality of the mpMRI scan, where 1 represents the poorest and 5 represents the best diagnostic quality. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Diagnostic performance is presented for the binary classification of EPE, including 95% confidence intervals and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 lobes from 121 men (mean age 56.9 years) were evaluated. Of these, 39 men (32.2%), or 43 lobes (18.6%), had EPE. A Likert score ≥3 had a sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), NPV, and PPV of 90.4%, 52.3%, 96%, and 29.9%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86). The AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.88), 0.78 (0.72-0.84), and 0.92 (0.88-0.96) for biparametric scans, PI-QUAL 1-3, and PI-QUAL 4-5 scans, respectively. Conclusions: MRI can be used effectively by genitourinary radiologists to rule out EPE and help inform surgical planning for men undergoing RARP. EPE prediction was more reliable when the MRI scan was (a) multi-parametric and (b) of a higher image quality according to the PI-QUAL scoring system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Dinneen
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Tom Strange
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Daniel Heffernan-Ho
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Jelena Banjeglav
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Jamie Lindsay
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - John-Patrick Mulligan
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Tim Briggs
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Jack Grierson
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Aiman Haider
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Christos Panayi
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Dominic Patel
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.H.); (C.P.); (D.P.); (A.F.)
| | - Jonathan Aning
- North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; (J.A.); (R.P.)
| | - Raj Persad
- North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK; (J.A.); (R.P.)
| | - Imran Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; (I.A.); (L.D.)
| | - Lorenzo Dutto
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; (I.A.); (L.D.)
| | - Neil Oakley
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK;
| | - Alessandro Ambrosi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Tom Parry
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK;
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
| | - Greg Shaw
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.G.); (V.K.); (F.G.); (G.S.)
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, Westmoreland Street Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; (J.B.); (J.L.); (J.-P.M.); (T.B.); (S.N.); (A.S.)
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; (C.A.); (T.S.); (D.H.-H.); (S.P.)
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
There Is No Longer a Role for Systematic Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 38:12-13. [PMID: 35199041 PMCID: PMC8844398 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
16
|
Tan WS, Leow JJ, Marchese M, Sridhar A, Hellawell G, Mossanen M, Teoh JYC, Fowler S, Colquhoun AJ, Cresswell J, Catto JWF, Trinh QD, Kelly JD. Defining Factors Associated with High-quality Surgery Following Radical Cystectomy: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Cystectomy Audit. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 33:1-10. [PMID: 34723215 PMCID: PMC8546928 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with high morbidity. Objective To evaluate healthcare and surgical factors associated with high-quality RC surgery. Design setting and participants Patients within the prospective British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry between 2014 and 2017 were included in this study. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis High-quality surgery was defined using pathological (absence of positive surgical margins and a minimum of a level I lymph node dissection template with a minimum yield of ten or more lymph nodes), recovery (length of stay ≤10 d), and technical (intraoperative blood loss <500 ml for open and <300 ml for minimally invasive RC) variables. A multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model was utilised to determine the factors associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery and index admission mortality. Results and limitations A total of 4654 patients with a median age of 70.0 yr underwent RC by 152 surgeons at 78 UK hospitals. The median surgeon and hospital operating volumes were 23.0 and 47.0 cases, respectively. A total of 914 patients (19.6%) received high-quality surgery. The minimum annual surgeon volume and hospital volume of ≥20 RCs/surgeon/yr and ≥68 RCs/hospital/yr, respectively, were the thresholds determined to achieve better rates of high-quality RC. The mixed-effect logistic regression model found that recent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.34, p < 0.001), laparoscopic/robotic RC (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.45-2.37, p < 0.001), and higher annual surgeon operating volume (23.1-33.0 cases [OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16-2.05, p = 0.003]; ≥33.1 cases [OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.29, p = 0.003]) were independently associated with high-quality surgery. High-quality surgery was an independent predictor of lower index admission mortality (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.87, p = 0.021). Conclusions We report that annual surgeon operating volume and use of minimally invasive RC were predictors of high-quality surgery. Patients receiving high-quality surgery were independently associated with lower index admission mortality. Our results support the role of centralisation of complex oncology and implementation of a quality assurance programme to improve the delivery of care. Patient summary In this registry study of patients treated with surgical excision of the urinary bladder for bladder cancer, we report that patients treated by a surgeon with a higher annual operative volume and a minimally invasive approach were associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery. Patients treated with high-quality surgery were more likely to be discharged alive following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Maya Marchese
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giles Hellawell
- Department of Urology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- The S H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sarah Fowler
- British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Colquhoun
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jo Cresswell
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Groeben C, Koch R, Baunacke M, Flegar L, Borkowetz A, Thomas C, Huber J. [Trends in uro-oncological surgery in Germany-comparative analyses from population-based data]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1257-1268. [PMID: 34490495 PMCID: PMC8420844 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Although urologic cancer represents a relevant health economic burden with about 100,000 new cases per year, hardly any knowledge exists about the structure and development of the corresponding uro-oncological interventions at the more than 400 urological surgical hospitals in Germany. Thus, we identified all cases of 5 major tumor surgery procedures in Germany from the DRG (diagnosis-related group) database of the Federal Statistical Office (prostatectomy, cystectomy, renal tumor surgery, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, penis surgery) from 2006-2013 (or 2016) by database query and investigated the influences of technical innovations, as well as guideline changes on the developments of case numbers. In addition, we analyzed the correlations between annual case numbers and perioperative outcomes. The results showed a clear correlation between case volume (and thus expertise) of a hospital and an improved perioperative outcome. Nevertheless, there is hardly any tendency towards centralization in these uro-oncological interventions. The development in the number of cases seems to depend more on the effect of advertising by means of technical innovations or the regional relation of the patients to a certain clinic. In the past, centrally controlled attempts to introduce minimum case numbers or voluntary certification of centers had little influence on the distribution of case numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Groeben
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - R Koch
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - M Baunacke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - L Flegar
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - A Borkowetz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - C Thomas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - J Huber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hospital volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a national population-based study using patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021:10.1038/s41391-021-00443-z. [PMID: 34493839 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00443-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improvements in short-term outcomes have been reported for hospitals with higher radical prostatectomy (RP) volumes. However, the association with longer-term functional outcomes is unknown. METHODS All patients diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer in the English NHS between 2014 and 2016 who underwent RP (N = 10,089) were mailed a survey ≥18 months after diagnosis. Differences in patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function (EPIC-26 on scale from 0 to 100) by hospital volume group (≤60, 61-100, 101-140, >140 RPs/year) were estimated using multilevel linear regression. RESULTS Overall, 7702 men (76.3%) responded. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary continence (p = 0.08) or sexual function scores with increasing volume group (p = 0.2). When modelled as a linear function, we found a non-significant increase of 0.70 (95% CI -0.41 to 1.80; p = 0.22) in urinary continence and a significant increase of 1.54 (0.62-2.45; p = 0.001) in sexual function scores for a 100-procedure increase in hospital volume, which did not meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference (10-12 points). The results were similar for robotic-assisted RP (5529 men [71.8%]). CONCLUSIONS These results do not support further centralisation of RP services beyond levels in England where four in five hospitals perform >60 RPs/year.
Collapse
|
19
|
Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nationwide, population-based study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253081. [PMID: 34138904 PMCID: PMC8211177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Few studies have investigated the association between surgical volume and outcome of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in an unselected cohort. We sought to investigate the association between surgical volume with peri-operative and short-term outcomes in a nation-wide, population-based study group. Methods 9,810 RARP’s registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden (2015–2018) were included. Associations between outcome and volume were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression including age, PSA-density, number of positive biopsy cores, cT stage, Gleason score, and extent of lymph node dissection. Results Surgeons and hospitals in the highest volume group compared to lowest group had shorter operative time; surgeon (OR 9.20, 95% CI 7.11–11.91), hospital (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.53–3.06), less blood loss; surgeon (OR 2.58. 95% CI 2.07–3.21) hospital (no difference), more often nerve sparing intention; surgeon (OR 2.89, 95% CI 2.34–3.57), hospital (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.66–2.44), negative margins; surgeon (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.54–2.35), hospital (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07–1.53). There was wide range in outcome between hospitals and surgeons with similar volume that remained after adjustment. Conclusions High surgeon and hospital volume were associated with better outcomes. The range in outcome was wide in all volume groups, which indicates that factors besides volume are of importance. Registration of surgical performance is essential for quality control and improvement.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abozaid M, Tan WS, Khetrapal P, Baker H, Duncan J, Sridhar A, Briggs T, Selim M, Abdallah MM, Elmahdy AA, Elserafy F, Kelly JD. Recovery of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion. BJU Int 2021; 129:72-79. [PMID: 34092021 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC), and to identify factors impacting on return to baseline. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing iRARC between January 2016 and December 2017 completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EORTC-QLQ-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BLM30) questionnaires before surgery and had a minimum of 12 months follow-up postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 76 patients met the inclusion criteria at 12 months. Neobladder (NB) cases (n = 24) were younger (57.0 vs 71.0 years, P < 0.001) and fitter than ileal conduit (IC) cases (n = 52), and had higher physical (100.0 vs 93.3, P = 0.039) and sexual functioning (66.7 vs 50.0, P = 0.013) scores at baseline. Longitudinal analysis of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 showed that physical (NB: 93.3 vs 100.0, P = 0.020; IC: 80.0 vs 93.3, P < 0.001) and role functioning scores (NB: 83.3 vs 100.0, P = 0.010; IC: 83.3 vs 100.0, P = 0.017) decreased and fatigue score (NB: 22.2 vs 11.1, P = 0.026; IC: 33.3 vs 22.2, P = 0.008) increased at 3 months in both diversion groups. Scores returned to baseline at 6 months except physical functioning score in IC patients that remained below baseline until 12 months (86.7 vs 93.3, P = 0.012). The global HRQoL score did not show significant change postoperatively in both groups. A major 90-day Clavien-Dindo complication was a significant predictor (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.62; P = 0.012) of deteriorated global HRQoL score at 3 months, while occurrence of a late complication (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.65; P = 0.013) was a predictor of deteriorated global HRQoL score at 12 months. Longitudinal analysis of the EORTC-QLQ-BLM30 showed that urinary problems (NB: 14.3 vs 38.3, P < 0.001; IC: 5.6 vs 19.1, P < 0.001) and future perspective (NB: 33.3 vs 44.4, P = 0.004; IC: 22.2 vs 44.4, P < 0.001) scores were better than baseline at 3 months. Sexual function deteriorated significantly at 3 months (NB: 8.3 vs 66.7, P < 0.001; IC: 4.2 vs 50.0, P < 0.001) and then showed improvement at 12 months but was still below baseline (NB: 33.3 vs 66.7, P = 0.001; IC: 25.0 vs 50.0, P < 0.001). Involvement in penile rehabilitation was shown to be a significant predictor (β 18.62, 95% CI 6.06-30.45; P = 0.005) of higher sexual function score at 12 months. CONCLUSION While most functional domains and symptoms scales recover to or exceed baseline within 6 months of iRARC, physical function remains below baseline in IC patients up to 12 months. Global HRQoL is preserved for both types of urinary diversion; however, postoperative complications seem to be the main driving factor for global HRQoL. Sexual function is adversely affected after iRARC suggesting that structured rehabilitation of sexual function should be an integral part of the RC pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Abozaid
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Wei Shen Tan
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Pramit Khetrapal
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hilary Baker
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jacqueline Duncan
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Briggs
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mohamed Selim
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | | | - Alaa Aldin Elmahdy
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Fatma Elserafy
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - John D Kelly
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shah TT, Cathcart P. Surgical Volume Is Important for Radical Prostatectomy, but Now We Need to Move Beyond Volume as a Proxy for Quality. Eur Urol 2021; 80:546-548. [PMID: 34092437 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Van den Broeck T, Oprea-Lager D, Moris L, Kailavasan M, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Gandaglia G, Gillessen Sommer S, Grummet JP, Grivas N, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason M, O'Hanlon S, Pecanka J, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Mottet N. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 80:531-545. [PMID: 33962808 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review on the association between surgeon or hospital volume and oncological and nononcological outcomes following RP for PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. All comparative studies for nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP published between January 1990 and May 2020 were included. For inclusion, studies had to compare hospital or surgeon volume, defined as caseload per unit time. Main outcomes included oncological (including prostate-specific antigen persistence, positive surgical margin [PSM], biochemical recurrence, local and distant recurrence, and cancer-specific and overall survival) and nononcological (perioperative complications including need for blood transfusion, conversion to open procedure and within 90-d death, and continence and erectile function) outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were undertaken. Both a narrative and a quantitative synthesis were planned if the data allowed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sixty retrospective comparative studies were included. Generally, increasing surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with lower rates of mortality, PSM, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. Combining group size cut-offs as used in the included studies, the median threshold for hospital volume at which outcomes start to diverge is 86 (interquartile range [IQR] 35-100) cases per year. In addition, above this threshold, the higher the caseload, the better the outcomes, especially for PSM. RoB and confounding were high for most domains. CONCLUSIONS Higher surgeon and hospital volumes for RP are associated with lower rates of PSMs, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. This association becomes apparent from a caseload of >86 (IQR 35-100) per year and may further improve hereafter. Both high- and low-volume centres should measure their outcomes, make them publicly available, and improve their quality of care if needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to determine whether the number of prostate cancer operations (radical prostatectomy) performed in a hospital affects the outcomes of surgery. We found that, overall, hospitals with a higher number of operations per year have better outcomes in terms of cancer recurrence and complications during or after hospitalisation. However, it must be noted that surgeons working in hospitals with lower annual operations can still achieve similar or even better outcomes. Therefore, making hospital's outcome data publicly available should be promoted internationally, so that patients can make an informed decision where they want to be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen Sommer
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Thomas B L Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôspital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheraghlou S, Christensen SR, Leffell DJ, Girardi M. Association of Treatment Facility Characteristics With Overall Survival After Mohs Micrographic Surgery for T1a-T2a Invasive Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:531-539. [PMID: 33787836 PMCID: PMC8014201 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Early-stage melanoma, among the most common cancers in the US, is typically treated with wide local excision. However, recent advances in immunohistochemistry have led to an increasing number of these cases being excised via Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Although studies of resections for other cancers have reported that facility-level factors are associated with patient outcomes, it is not yet established how these factors may affect outcomes for patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Objective To evaluate the association of treatment center academic affiliation and case volume with long-term patient survival after MMS for T1a-T2a invasive melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants In a retrospective cohort study, 4062 adults with nonmetastatic, T1a-T2a melanoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 and treated with MMS in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were identified. The NCDB includes all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities and is estimated to capture approximately 50% of all incident melanomas in the US. Multivariable survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Data analysis was conducted from February 27 to August 18, 2020. Exposures Treatment facility characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results The study population included 4062 patients (2213 [54.5%] men; median [SD] age, 60 [16.3] years) treated at 462 centers. Sixty-two centers were top decile-volume facilities (TDVFs), which treated 1757 patients (61.9%). Most TDVFs were academic institutions (37 of 62 [59.7%]). On multivariable analysis, treatment at an academic center was associated with a nearly 30% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.596-0.895). In a separate analysis, treatment at TDVFs was also associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.648-0.977). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, treatment of patients with T1a-T2a invasive melanoma excised with MMS at academic and top decile-volume (≥8 cases per year) facilities was associated with improved long-term survival compared with those excised by MMS at nonacademic and low-volume facilities. Identification and protocolization of the practices of these facilities may help to reduce survival differences between centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - David J. Leffell
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael Girardi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS Many assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.
Collapse
|
25
|
[Does structural and process quality of certified prostate cancer centers result in better medical care?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:59-66. [PMID: 32876699 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01321-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An improved structural and process quality could be demonstrated 13 years after certification of the first German prostate cancer center. The question of optimization of the functional quality by establishing organ cancer centers arises. OBJECTIVE A critical benefit-risk analysis of organ cancer centers was carried out to evaluate an improved quality of results. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on published results from individual centers and the individual annual reports of the German Cancer Society (DKG), the data for evaluating the quality of results were checked. For the issuing of certificates, the focus is on quality indicators for oncological surgery. The functional quality of results is assessed exclusively by a questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS An improvement in the quality of functional results after radical prostatectomy has not yet been demonstrated. The functional quality features of urinary continence and erectile function that are essential for the quality of life and patient satisfaction are only insufficiently assessed due to the lack of objective measuring instruments and are not relevant for certification. There is no reliable evidence for improved overall survival, reduction in tumor-specific mortality, and optimization of functional results in certified centers. CONCLUSION The relationship between certification and excellence cannot be proven without individual consideration of a surgeon-specific pentafecta analysis. For this reason, certification-relevant surgeon-related quality assurance is recommended.
Collapse
|
26
|
Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Huland H, Graefen M, Beyer B. [Quality criteria in urology : How to obtain comparable results?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:193-198. [PMID: 33439289 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01437-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The standardization of procedural flow and medical documentation increasingly allows further possibilities. The best-known example of process standardization is the centralized treatment of complex clinical pictures, while patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) enable standardized documentation. Using the example of prostate cancer, existing literature on the topic of quality optimization in medicine is discussed. The following key points are addressed: (1) Increasing use of standardized PROMs for outcome documentation. (2) The transfer of complex clinical pictures to dedicated specialized centers has been shown to increase the quality of patient care as long as standardized PROMs are used. (3) Healthcare policymakers benefit from the use of PROMs and increasingly pursue a "value-based healthcare" approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - D Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - H Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - B Beyer
- Martini-Klinik Prostatakrebszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reitblat C, Bain PA, Porter ME, Bernstein DN, Feeley TW, Graefen M, Iyer S, Resnick MJ, Stimson CJ, Trinh QD, Gershman B. Value-Based Healthcare in Urology: A Collaborative Review. Eur Urol 2021; 79:571-585. [PMID: 33413970 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT In response to growing concerns over rising costs and major variation in quality, improving value for patients has been proposed as a fundamentally new strategy for how healthcare should be delivered, measured, and remunerated. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature regarding the implementation and impact of value-based healthcare in urology. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed to identify studies that described the implementation of one or more elements of value-based healthcare in urologic settings and in which the associated change in healthcare value had been measured. Twenty-two publications were selected for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Reorganization of urologic care around medical conditions was associated with increased use of guidelines-compliant care for men with prostate cancer, and improved outcomes for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Measuring outcomes for every patient was associated with improved prostate cancer outcomes, while the measurement of costs using time-driven activity-based costing was associated with reduced resource utilization in a pediatric multidisciplinary clinic. Centralization of urologic cancer care in the UK, Denmark, and Canada was associated with overall improved outcomes, although systems integration in the USA yielded mixed results among urologic cancer patients. No studies have yet examined bundled payments for episodes of care, expanding the geographic reach for centers of excellence, or building enabling information technology platforms. CONCLUSIONS Few studies have critically assessed the actual or simulated implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, but the available literature suggests promising early results. In order to effectively redesign care, there is a need for further research to both evaluate the potential results of proposed value-based healthcare interventions and measure their effects where already implemented. PATIENT SUMMARY While few studies have evaluated the implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, the available literature suggests promising early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanan Reitblat
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael E Porter
- Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David N Bernstein
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program (HCORP), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas W Feeley
- Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Embold Health, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - C J Stimson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Welton ML. Invited commentary for "The what? How? And Who? Of video based assessment. Am J Surg 2020; 221:11-12. [PMID: 32778400 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lane Welton
- Fairview Health Services, United States; Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thompson JE, Sridhar AN, Shaw G, Rajan P, Mohammed A, Briggs TP, Nathan S, Kelly JD, Sooriakumaran P. Peri-operative, functional and early oncologic outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after high-intensity focused ultrasound partial ablation. BMC Urol 2020; 20:81. [PMID: 32611411 PMCID: PMC7329479 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00656-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial ablation of the prostate using high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU-PA) is a treatment option for localised prostate cancer. When local recurrence occurs, salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for selected patients, but there is a paucity of data on the peri-operative safety, functional and oncologic outcomes of sRARP.. The objective of this study was therefore to describe peri-operative safety, functional and early oncologic outcomes following salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) for local recurrence after HIFU-PA. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 53 consecutive men who underwent sRARP after HIFU-PA from 2012 to 2018. Continence and erectile-function were reported pre-HIFU, pre-sRARP, 3-months post-sRARP and 12-months post-sRARP. Complications, PSMs and need for subsequent ADT/radiotherapy were assessed. RESULTS 45 men were suitable for inclusion and had sufficient data for analyses. Median duration from HIFU to sRARP was 30.0 months and median follow-up post-sRARP was 17.7 months. Median age, PSA and ISUP group were 63.0 yrs., 7.2 ng/mL and 2; 88.9% were cT2. Median operative-console time, blood loss and hospital stay were 140 min, 200 ml and 1 day respectively. Clavien-Dindo grade 1, 2 and 3 complications < 90 days occurred in 8.9, 6.7 and 2.2%; late (>90d) complications occurred in 13.2%. At sRARP pathology, ISUP 3-5 occurred in 51.1%, pT3a/b in 64.5%, and PSMs in 44.4% (37.5% for pT2, 48.3% for pT3). Of men with > 3-months follow-up after sRARP, 26.3% underwent adjuvant radiotherapy/ADT for residual disease or adverse pathologic features; 5.3% experienced BCR requiring salvage ADT/radiotherapy. Freedom from ADT/radiotherapy was 66.7% at 12-months. Pad-free rates were 100% pre-HIFU, 95.3% post-HIFU, 29.4% 3-months post-sRARP, and 65.5% 12-months post-sRARP. Median IIEF-5 scores pre-HIFU, post-HIFU, 3- and 12-months post-sRARP were 23.5, 16, 5 and 5, respectively. Potency rates were 81.8, 65.5, 0 and 0%, respectively. Bilateral/unilateral nerve sparing were feasible in 7%/22%. CONCLUSION Salvage RARP was safe with acceptable but sub-optimal continence and poor sexual-function and poor oncologic outcomes. One in three men required additional treatment within 12-months. This information may aid men and urologists with treatment selection and counselling regarding primary HIFU-PA vs primary RARP and when considering salvage RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Thompson
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.
| | - Ashwin N Sridhar
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Prabhakar Rajan
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anna Mohammed
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Timothy P Briggs
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital, London, W1G 8PH, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pugh CM, Hashimoto DA, Korndorffer JR. The what? How? And Who? Of video based assessment. Am J Surg 2020; 221:13-18. [PMID: 32665080 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there is significant variability in the development, implementation and overarching goals of video review for assessment of surgical performance. METHODS This paper evaluates the current methods in which video review is used for evaluation of surgical performance and identifies which processes are critical for successful, widespread implementation of video-based assessment. RESULTS Despite the advances in video capture technology and growing interest in video-based assessment, there is a notable gap in the implementation and longitudinal use of formative and summative assessment using video. CONCLUSION Validity, scalability and discoverability are current but removable barriers to video-based assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla M Pugh
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Daniel A Hashimoto
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - James R Korndorffer
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Prebay ZJ, Peabody JO, Miller DC, Ghani KR. Video review for measuring and improving skill in urological surgery. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 16:261-267. [PMID: 30622365 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-018-0138-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Interest is growing within the urological surgery community for objective assessments of technical skill. Surgical video review relies on the use of objective assessment tools to evaluate both global and procedure-specific skill. These evaluations provide structured feedback to surgeons with the aim of improving technique, which has been associated with patient outcomes. Currently, skill assessments can be performed by using expert peer-review, crowdsourcing or computer-based methods. Given the relationship between skill and patient outcomes, surgeons might be required in the future to provide empirical evidence of their technical skill for certification, employment, credentialing and quality improvement. Interventions such as coaching and skills workshops incorporating video review might help surgeons improve their skill, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J Prebay
- School of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James O Peabody
- Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David C Miller
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Khurshid R Ghani
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Siemens DR, Visram K, Wei X, Booth C. Effect of centralization on complex surgical care: A population-based case study of radical cystectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 14:91-96. [PMID: 31702550 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to determine whether non-mandated or passive centralization of radical cystectomy (RC) to higher-volume centers leads to enhanced processes of care and outcomes. METHODS This is a population-based, retrospective, cohort study that used the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) to identify all incident patients who underwent RC from 1994-2013. Electronic records of treatment were linked to OCR; pathology records were obtained for all cases and reviewed by a team of trained data abstractors. The primary objective was to describe annual provider RC volumes. Secondary objectives included investigating process and outcome measures. RESULTS For the 5574 patients identified, the mean annual surgeon volume and hospital volume of RC from 1994-2008 was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-4.7) and 12.2 (95% CI 11.8-12.5), respectively. From 2009-2013, these volumes significantly increased to 6.8 (95% CI 6.5-7. 1) and 16.4 (95% CI 15.8-16.9). Process variables improved over time, including the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Over the study period, there was a substantial improvement in cancer-specific survival (CSS): hazard ratio (HR) 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67) for 2009-2013. During the most recent era, there was still evidence of a provider volume effect on both process measures and CSS. CONCLUSIONS There has been recent passive centralization of RC to higher-volume providers in the province of Ontario, with measurable improvements in processes of quality care. Although centralization was also associated with improvement in CSS, in the most recent era, there continues to be low-volume providers with a residual volume-outcome effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Kash Visram
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Xuejiao Wei
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher Booth
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kasivisvanathan V, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor, re: Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Armando Stabile, Joana B. Neves, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2019;76:284-303: The choice of diagnostic test in prostate cancer is a balance of the risks and benefits: One size may not fit all. Eur Urol 2019; 76:e133-e134. [PMID: 31400949 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Research Collaborative, London, UK.
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham & NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; NIHR UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hospital and surgical volumes, as well as complications, are considered to influence intra and postoperative results in most surgical operations. This trend is also seen in uro-oncologic surgery. The objective of this review is to critically analyze the most recent literature to give a comprehensive overview on whether surgical and hospital volumes have an impact, and whether regionalization of the procedure should be advised. RECENT FINDINGS Uro-oncologic surgery has recently become more regionalized, and data coming from different population-based analyses appear to support this trend. Recent data suggest that the most beneficial procedures could be radical cystectomy, radical prostatectomy, and partial nephrectomy. For radical cystectomy, even considering different cut-off values, saw better results for postoperative complications, mortality and long-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients treated in high-volume institutions. Centralization of radical prostatectomy seems to affect short-term outcomes and costs related to prostate cancer treatment, with high-volume institutions providing more affordable treatments reducing cancer recurrence and progression. Partial nephrectomy is more frequently performed in cT1-b cancer in high-volume than low-volume institutions. Additionally, in this setting it has a higher success rate and lower complications, shorter operative time, and fewer prolonged hospital stays. SUMMARY Regionalization of the procedure in high-volume centers seems to have impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality for the most frequent major uro-oncological procedures: radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, and partial nephrectomy; but there are insufficient data available on other procedures.
Collapse
|
35
|
Aning JJ, Reilly GS, Fowler S, Challacombe B, McGrath JS, Sooriakumaran P. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in the UK: an analysis of surgeon-reported data. BJU Int 2019; 124:441-448. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J. Aning
- Bristol Urological Institute; North Bristol NHS Trust; Southmead Hospital; Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol UK
| | - Gavin S. Reilly
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine; Botnar Research Centre; University of Oxford; Oxford UK
| | - Sarah Fowler
- British Association of Urological Surgeons; London UK
| | - Ben Challacombe
- King's Health Partners; Guys Hospital; King's College London; London UK
| | - John S. McGrath
- Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital; Exeter UK
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Knipper S, Graefen M. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy-So Successful Because It Is Better or Better Because It Is So Successful? Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 1:361-363. [PMID: 31158074 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Knipper
- Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Raphael MJ, Siemens DR, Booth CM. Would Regionalization of Systemic Cancer Therapy Improve the Quality of Cancer Care? J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:349-356. [PMID: 31112481 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Raphael
- 1 Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,2 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Robert Siemens
- 1 Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,2 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- 1 Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,2 Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, Heinzer H, Tilki D, Salomon G, Michl U, Steuber T, Budäus L, Maurer T, Tennstedt P, Huland H, Graefen M. A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU Int 2019; 123:1031-1040. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Haese
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Hans Heinzer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Uwe Michl
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
- Department of Urology; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Pierre Tennstedt
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Outcome; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Siemens DR. Are we ready to embark on further regionalization of urological surgery across Canada? Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 13:7-8. [PMID: 30721122 PMCID: PMC6363563 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; CUAJ Editor-in-Chief
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Linking surgical skills to postoperative outcomes: a Delphi study on the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 2019; 13:675-687. [PMID: 30610535 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-00916-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an assessment instrument for the evaluation of surgical videos to elucidate the association between surgical skills and postoperative outcomes after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN A Delphi study consisting of two consecutive online surveys and a consensus group meeting. SETTING Urology departments of general, teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS All Dutch urologists with a specialization in RARP. RESULTS Of 18 invited experts, 12 (67%) participated in the first online survey. In the second round, 9 of the 18 invited experts participated (50%). The Delphi meeting was attended by 5 of the 18 (27%) invited experts. The panel identified seven surgical steps with a possible association to postoperative outcomes. The experts also expected an association between adverse postoperative outcomes and the frequency of camera removals, the number of stitches placed, the amount of bleeding, and the extent of coagulation. These factors were incorporated into an assessment instrument. CONCLUSIONS Experts in the field of RARP achieved consensus on 7 surgical steps and 4 aspects of the RARP procedure that may be related to adverse postoperative outcomes. The resulting assessment instrument will be tested in future research to determine its validity.
Collapse
|
41
|
Immediate Impact of Centralization on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Outcomes for a Vascular Network in the South West of England. Ann Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
42
|
Henríquez I, Rodríguez-Antolín A, Cassinello J, Gonzalez San Segundo C, Unda M, Gallardo E, López-Torrecilla J, Juarez A, Arranz J. Consensus statement on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk prostate cancer patients on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:392-401. [PMID: 28785912 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1726-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent malignancy in men and the second cause of mortality in industrialized countries. METHODS Based on Spanish Register of PCa, the incidence of high-risk PCa is 29%, approximately. In spite of the evidence-based beneficial effect of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk PCa, these patients (pts) are still a therapeutic challenge for all specialists involved, in part due to the absence of comparative studies to establish which of the present disposable treatments offer better results. RESULTS Nowadays, high-risk PCa definition is not well consensual through the published oncology guides. Clinical stage, tumour grade, and number of risk factors are relevant to be considered on PCa prognosis. However, these factors are susceptible to change depending on when surgical or radiation therapy is considered to be the treatment of choice. Other factors, such as reference pathologist, different diagnosis biopsy schedules, surgical or radiotherapy techniques, adjuvant treatments, biochemical failures, and follow-up, make it difficult to compare the results between different therapeutic options. CONCLUSIONS This article reviews important issues concerning high-risk PCa. URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies have reached a consensus addressing a practical recommendation on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Henríquez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario of Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), Josep Laporte 2, 43204, Reus, Spain.
| | | | - J Cassinello
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | | | - M Unda
- Urology Department, Hospital Barakaldo, Bilbao, Spain
| | - E Gallardo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | - A Juarez
- Urology Department, Hospital Cádiz, Andalucía, Spain
| | - J Arranz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gershman B, Meier SK, Jeffery MM, Moreira DM, Tollefson MK, Kim SP, Karnes RJ, Shah ND. Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Centralization of Care. J Urol 2017; 198:92-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Gershman
- Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital and Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sarah K. Meier
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Molly M. Jeffery
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Daniel M. Moreira
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Simon P. Kim
- Department of Urology, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Nilay D. Shah
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Paterson C, McLuckie S, Yew-Fung C, Tang B, Lang S, Nabi G. Videotaping of surgical procedures and outcomes following extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114:1016-1023. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Paterson
- Academic Section of Urology; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee, Scotland
| | | | - Chin Yew-Fung
- Academic Section of Urology; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee, Scotland
| | - Benjie Tang
- Cuscheiri Skills Centre; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee, Scotland
| | - Stephen Lang
- Academic Section of Urology; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee, Scotland
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- Academic Section of Urology; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
High volume is the key for improving in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2013. World J Urol 2016; 35:1045-1053. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1982-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
46
|
Groeben C, Koch R, Baunacke M, Wirth MP, Huber J. Robots drive the German radical prostatectomy market: a total population analysis from 2006 to 2013. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 19:412-416. [DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
47
|
Lanchon C, Custillon G, Moreau-Gaudry A, Descotes JL, Long JA, Fiard G, Voros S. Augmented Reality Using Transurethral Ultrasound for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Preclinical Evaluation. J Urol 2016; 196:244-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Lanchon
- Urology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Guillaume Custillon
- Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry
- Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
- Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Innovation Technologique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Descotes
- Urology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Alexandre Long
- Urology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Gaelle Fiard
- Urology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - Sandrine Voros
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité-Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications-Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dickinson L, Arya M, Afzal N, Cathcart P, Charman SC, Cornaby A, Hindley RG, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nathan S, Ogden C, Persad R, van der Meulen J, Weir S, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Medium-term Outcomes after Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer from a Multicentre Registry Cohort. Eur Urol 2016; 70:668-674. [PMID: 26951947 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally-invasive treatment for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To report medium-term outcomes in men receiving primary whole-gland HIFU from a national multi-centre registry cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Five-hundred and sixty-nine patients at eight hospitals were entered into an academic registry. INTERVENTION Whole-gland HIFU (Sonablate 500) for primary nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Redo-HIFU was permitted as part of the intervention. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Our primary failure-free survival outcome incorporated no transition to any of the following: (1) local salvage therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), (2) systemic therapy, (3) metastases, or (4) prostate cancer-specific mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and genitourinary function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Mean age was 65 yr (47-87 yr). Median prostate-specific antigen was 7.0 ng/ml (interquartile range 4.4-10.2). National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease was 161 (28%), 321 (56%), and 81 (14%), respectively. One hundred and sixty three of 569 (29%) required a total of 185 redo-HIFU procedures. Median follow-up was 46 (interquartile range 23-61) mo. Failure-free survival at 5 yr after first HIFU was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-74). This was 87% (95% CI: 78-93), 63% (95% CI: 56-70), and 58% (95% CI: 32-77) for National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Fifty eight of 754 (7.7%) had one urinary tract infection, 22/574 (2.9%) a recurrent urinary tract infection, 22/754 (3%) epididymo-orchitis, 227/754 (30%) endoscopic interventions, 1/754 (0.13%) recto-urethral fistula, and 1/754 (0.13%) osteitis pubis. Of 206 known to be pad-free pre-HIFU, 183/206 (88%) remained pad free, and of 236 with good baseline erectile function, 91/236 (39%) maintained good function. The main limitation is lack of long-term data. CONCLUSIONS Whole-gland HIFU is a repeatable day-case treatment that confers low rates of urinary incontinence. Disease control at a median of just under 5 yr of follow-up demonstrates its potential as a treatment for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Endoscopic interventions and erectile dysfunction rates are similar to other whole-gland treatments. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report we looked at the 5-yr outcomes following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer and found that cancer control was acceptable with a low risk of urine leakage. However, risk of erectile dysfunction and further operations was similar to other whole-gland treatments like surgery and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Dickinson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Department of Urology, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, UK
| | - Paul Cathcart
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susan C Charman
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Andrew Cornaby
- Department of Urology, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Henry Lewi
- Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex NHS Trust, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Ogden
- Department of Academic Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Shraddha Weir
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures. J Sex Med 2016; 13:435-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2015] [Revised: 01/09/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
50
|
Oberlin DT, Flum AS, Lai JD, Meeks JJ. The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:255.e1-5. [PMID: 26935867 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To determine how robotic prostatectomy affects practice patterns of urologists, we examined the case volume characteristics among certifying urologists for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesized that the utilization of open and robotic prostatectomy as well as lymph node dissection changed dynamically over the last 10 years. METHODS A total of 6-month case log data of certifying urologists from 2003 to 2013 were obtained for the American Board of Urology. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with a corresponding diagnosis of prostate cancer as defined by ICD-9 code 185.0. RESULTS OBTAINED A total of 6,563 urologists submitted case logs, of which 68% (4,470/6,563) reported performing at least one radical prostatectomy (RP), totaling 46,030 RPs logged. There was a 376% increase in the performance of RALP over the study period with robotic volume increasing from 22% of all RP in 2003 to 85% in 2013. Among surgeons performing ORP, the median number performed was 2; of surgeons who performed RALP, the median number performed was 8 (P<0.001). Overall, 39% of surgeons logging ORP performed 2 or fewer RP, whereas 19% of surgeons who performed RALP performed 2 or less RP (P<0.001). The highest volume robotic surgeons (top 10% surgical volume) performed 41% of all RALP with the highest performing robotic surgeon recording 658 prostatectomies over 6 months. Oncologists represented 4.1% of all surgeons performing RP and performed 15.1% of all RP (P<0.001); general urologists performed the majority of RP (57.8%). When performed open, there was no influence of surgeon specialty on the performance of lymph node dissection (LND); if performed robotically, oncologists were significantly more likely to perform LND compared with general surgeons (47% vs. 25.9%, respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Robotic prostatectomies are performed 5 times more commonly than open prostatectomy and represent 85% of all RP performed by board-certified urologists in 2013. Compared to RALP, ORP are significantly more likely to be performed by lower volume surgeons. Oncologists perform a higher relative percentage of RPs and are significantly more likely to perform LND if performed robotically when compared with general urologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel T Oberlin
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Andrew S Flum
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeremy D Lai
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|