The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: European Association of Urology Recommendations in 2016

Pathological Response and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Receiving Immunotherapy-Based Therapies and Undergoing Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (CN)

In this study we evaluated outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immunotherapy before surgery. We found that receiving immunotherapy combinations before surgery can offer patients benefits in reducing tumor size and improving disease control.

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IO) has improved outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the timing of surgical intervention for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is still controversial for this group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with mRCC receiving IO-based therapies and undergoing CN. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent upfront CN and those who underwent deferred CN. Pathologic and radiographic features along with clinical outcomes were systematically collected. Comparisons were performed using Chi-square test, paired t-Test or Mann-Whitney-U test. Progression Free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with mRCC were included, with a median follow-up of 21 months. 38 (74.5%) patients received IO-based therapies prior to CN, while 13 (25.5%) patients underwent up-front CN. IO-based therapies reduced median tumor size from pretreatment 10 cm to 8.6 cm post-treatment when given prior to CN. IO-TKI had a trend toward higher tumor shrinkage (-2.3 vs -1.2 cm). Pathologic T downstaging occurred in 42% (n=16) of patients, 11% (n=4) of whom had pT0 disease. Thrombus downstaging occurred in 13% (n=6) of patients, all with either partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in metastases. PFS (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.29-1.98, p=0.58) and OS (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.13-1.57, p=0.21) were not statistically significant between 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

IO-based therapies, particularly IO-TKIs, resulted in pathologic necrosis and reductions in tumor size prior to deferred CN. PFS and OS were similar for patients who received either upfront IO-based therapy or after CN.

2/1 dose schedule of sunitinib is superior than the 4/2 regimen for the first-line therapy of clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma - An Indian experience

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib remains the first-line treatment for favorable risk metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer (mccRCC). It was conventionally given in the 4/2 schedule; however, toxicity necessitated trying the 2/1 regimen. Regional variations in treatment response and toxicity are known, and there is no data from the Indian subcontinent about the outcomes of the alternative dosing schedule.

METHODS

Clinical records of all consecutive adult patients who received sunitinib as first-line therapy for histologically proven mccRCC following cytoreductive nephrectomy from 2010-2018 were reviewed. The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary objectives were to evaluate the response rate (objective response rate and clinical benefit rate), toxicity, and overall survival. A list of variables having a biologically plausible association with outcome was drawn and multivariate inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) analysis was done to determine the absolute effect size of dosing schedules on PFS in terms of "average treatment effect on the treated" and "potential outcome mean."

RESULTS

We found 2/1 schedule to be independently associated with higher PFS on IPTW analysis such that if every patient in the subpopulation received sunitinib by the 2/1 schedule, the average time to progression was estimated to be higher by 6.1 months than the 4/2 schedule. We also found 2/1 group to have a lower incidence than the 4/2 group for nearly all ≥ grade 3 adverse effects. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib should be given via the 2/1 schedule in Indian patients.

Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: 4 years after aggressive surgeries and anti-angiogenic therapy

Management of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has significantly changed after the era of targeted therapy that improved the overall survival (OS). Surgical decision-making remains a subject of controversy. We report a case of pelvic bone metastasis from RCC, 2 months after nephrectomy and surgery of a revealing clavicular metastasis.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy-Base Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series and Review of Current Literature

The role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy-based regimens is unclear. However, the ability to achieve a complete response for metastatic renal cell carcinoma likely requires a nephrectomy at some point during treatment. Here we present a case series of three patients with metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who received front-line immunotherapy-based treatment and subsequently underwent a cytoreductive nephrectomy. All three patients had a complete response to therapy and have subsequently remained off systemic therapy for a median of 531 days (range, 476–602). We also review the limited literature in this setting and highlight ongoing clinical trials. Although the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy-based treatment is uncertain, a subset of patients will benefit from either an immediate or deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy. Ongoing trials are underway to further determine how to incorporate cytoreductive nephrectomy into the treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Prognostic impact of systemic therapy change in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

Limited data are available regarding the effect of systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN).

METHODS

Overall, 161 patients with synchronously mRCC were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups based on the time of diagnosis: (i) early molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) (2008-2011), (ii) late mTT (2012-8/2016) and (iii) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) eras (9/2016-2018). Overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis was compared among the eras.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients, 52 (32%), 75 (46%), and 34 patients (21%) were classified into the early mTT, late mTT and ICI eras, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0065 and P = 0.0010, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.389). In 112 patients undergoing CN and systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0432 and P = 0.0498, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.320). Multivariate analysis of OS in the 161 synchronous mRCC patients revealed that the era was an independent factor (P < 0.0001), together with the histopathological type (P = 0.0130), CN status (P = 0.0010), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk (P = 0.0002) and liver metastasis status (P = 0.0124).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis showed that systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era improved OS of mRCC patients undergoing CN.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Targeted Therapy-Data from the National Renis Registry

Simple Summary

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma is traditionally initiated with the removal of the diseased kidney with the tumor in many patients. However, there is ongoing controversy about the benefit of kidney removal if targeted therapy is used. The present paper analyses a large cohort of patients, and the results indicate that primary tumor removal should still be strongly considered in patients who are treated with targeted therapies.

Abstract

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in treatment of locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted therapies (TT) is still not clearly defined. The study population consisted of 730 patients with synchronous mRCC. The RenIS (Renal carcinoma Information System) registry was used as the data source. The CN/TT cohort included patients having CN within 3 months from the mRCC diagnosis and subsequently being treated with TT, while the TT cohort included patients receiving TT upfront. Median progression-free survival from the first intervention was 6.7 months in the TT arm and 9.3 months in the CN/TT patients (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 14.2 and 27.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Liver metastasis, high-grade tumor, absence of CN, non-clear cell histology, and MSKCC (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) poor prognosis status were associated with adverse treatment outcomes. According to the results of this retrospective study, patients who underwent CN and subsequently were treated with TT had better outcomes compared to patients treated with upfront TT. The results of the study support the use of CN in the treatment algorithm for mRCC.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase and Immuno-Oncology Checkpoint Inhibitors

The role for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved with advancements in systemic therapy. During the cytokine-based immunotherapy era, CN provided a clear survival benefit and was considered standard of care in management of mRCC. The development of targeted systemic therapy directed at the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway altered the treatment paradigm and accentuated the importance of risk stratification in treatment selection. This article reviews the literature evaluating the benefit of CN during the evolution of systemic therapy and provides clinical recommendations for current utilization of CN in patients with mRCC.

Serum and tissue syndecan-1 levels in renal cell carcinoma

Background

The proteoglycan syndecan-1 is involved in cell proliferation, adhesion and angiogenesis. It was shown to be involved in cancer progression in different tumor entities. So far, the role of syndecan-1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), one of the most common diseases in urologic oncology, was little described. Purpose of the present study was to obtain serum concentrations and tissue expression levels of syndecan-1 in a cohort of patients diagnosed with RCC.

Methods

Clinical and follow-up data were obtained from 413 RCC patients. SDC1 levels were determined in serum samples of 100 patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and tissue SDC1 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 343 cases. Results were correlated with clinicopathological and follow-up data.

Results

Five and ten years overall and cancer specific survival were 67% and 56% [overall survival (OS)] and 79% and 76% [cancer-specific survival (CSS)]. In female patients and locally advanced disease (≥T3), tissue SDC1 expression was decreased (female 85.6% vs. male 71.1% low tissue SDC1 expression, P=0.0153 and ≤T2 70.0% vs. ≥T3 87.2% low tissue SDC1 expression, P=0.0055) compared to male patients and organ confined disease. Locally advanced tumor stage, presence of lymph node or distant metastases, high Fuhrman grading and clear cell carcinoma as histopathological subtype were independent prognostic factors for reduced CSS and OS. There was no impact of serum SDC1 (sSDC1) serum concentration or SDC1 tissue protein expression on OS, CSS or recurrence free survival (RFS) in uni- or multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

sSDC1 concentration or SDC1 tissue protein expression levels had no influence on patients' prognosis in the present cohort of patients diagnosed with RCC.

Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown.

Objective

To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied.

Interventions

Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points.

Results

The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy: does CARMENA (Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques) change everything?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past few years the treatment options for renal cell cancer (RCC) have rapidly evolved. Even in the setting of metastatic disease, a consistent component of treatment in RCC patients has been cytoreductive nephrectomy based on the results of research carried out over a decade ago. Despite huge shifts in systemic treatment modalities, cytoreductive nephrectomy continued to be recommended despite a lack of evidence for its use in metastatic RCC in those patients receiving state-of-the-art therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

To address the lack of evidence, two recent trials [Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangioge[Combining Acute Accent]niques (CARMENA) and SURTIME] sought to assess the role and sequence of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic RCC patients receiving vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. The results of one of these trials, namely CARMENA, demonstrated no benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy when used in combination with the vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor Sunitinib. However, with further developments in medical treatment and questions regarding the specific methods of the trial - do these results change everything for the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy?

SUMMARY

While the results from CARMENA and SURTIME are not conclusive, they suggest that those patients with advanced disease requiring systemic therapy should indeed receive this first prior to any cytoreductive nephrectomy.

A rationale for surgical debulking to improve anti-PD1 therapy outcome in non small cell lung cancer

Anti-PD1 immunotherapy has emerged as a gold-standard treatment for first- or second-line treatment of stage IV NSCLC, with response rates ranging from 10 to 60%. Strategies to improve the disease control rate are needed. Several reports suggested that debulking surgery enhances anti-tumor immunity. We aimed at examining tumor burden as a predictive factor of anti-PD1 tretment efficacy and to evaluate the role of cytoreductive surgery in anti-PD1 treated NSCLC. Immunocompetent DBA/2 mice engrafted with various amount of allogeneic lung squamous cancer KLN-205 cells were treated with anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody. Mice engrafted with two tumors also underwent a debulking surgery or a sham procedure. Tumor volume was monitored to assess treatment efficacy. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were assessed by flow cytometry. In a retrospective study of 48 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with Nivolumab who underwent a 18-FDG PETscan before treatment onset, the prognostic role of metabolic tumor volume was analysed. Anti-PD1 treatment effect was greater in mice bearing smaller tumors. Treatment with higher doses of anti-PD1 antibody did not improve the outcome, independently of the size of the tumor. In mice bearing 2 tumors, excision of 1 tumor improved the anti-PD1 treatment effect on the remaining tumor. In 48 NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD1 treatment, high metabolic tumor volume was associated with poor overall survival and the absence of clinical benefit. Treg infiltration, but not effector T cells, was positively correlated to tumor volume. Taken together, our results suggest that tumor volume is a predictive factor of anti-PD1 efficacy in NSCLC. Additionally, an experimental murine model suggests that tumor debulking may improve control of residual tumor.

Who is dying after nephrectomy for cancer? Study of risk factors and causes of death after analyzing morbidity and mortality reviews (UroCCR-33 study)

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Nephrectomy is the treatment for renal cell cancer from T1-4 tumors but remains at risk. To determine the thirty-day mortality rate after nephrectomy for cancer and to identify causes and risk factors of death in order to find clinical applications. From 2014 to 2017, we performed a retrospective multicentric analysis of prospectively collected data study involving the French network for research on kidney cancer (UroCCR). All patients who died after nephrectomy for cancer during the first thirty days were identified. Patients' characteristics, causes of death and morbidity and mortality reviews reports were analyzed for each death.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 2578 patients underwent nephrectomy and 35 deaths occurred. The thirty-day mortality rate was 1.4%. In univariate analysis, symptoms at diagnosis (P=0.006, OR=2.56 IC (1.3-5.03)), c stage superior to cT1 (P<0.0001, OR=6.13 IC (2.8-13.2)), cT stage superior to cT2 (P<0.0001, OR=8.8 IC (4.39-17.8)), nodal invasion (P<0.0001, OR=4.6 IC (1.9-10.7)), distant metastasis (P=0.001, OR=4.01 IC (1.7-8.9)), open surgery (P<0.0001, OR=0.272 IC (0.13-0.54)) and radical nephrectomy (P=0.007, OR=2.737 IC (1.3-5.7)) were risk factors of thirty-day mortality. In a multivariable model, only cT stage superior to T2 (P=0.015, OR=3.55 IC (1.27-10.01)) was a risk factor of thirty-day mortality. The main cause of postoperative death was pulmonary (n=15; 43%). The second cause was postoperative digestive sepsis for 7 patients (20%). Only 2 morbidity and mortality reviews had been done for the 35 deaths. Limitations are related to the thirty-day mortality criteria and descriptive study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients, stage cTNM and type and techniques of surgery are determinants of thirty-day mortality after nephrectomy for cancer. The first cause of postoperative death is pulmonary. Morbidity and mortality reviews should be considered to better understand causes of death and to reduce early mortality after nephrectomy for cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Position of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: does the CARMENA trial lead to a paradigm shift?

Introduction > The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in combination with targeted therapy has been debated after the results of the CARMENA trial. We decided to reassess the available evidence on the setting of CN in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Methods > Critical review of the literature focusing on CN in mRCC patients. Results > Previous trials demonstrated a survival benefit of CN during the cytokine-era. In the targeted therapies-era, retrospective studies has confirmed the survival benefit of CN but presented inherent selection biases. Recently, the CARMENA trial showed that sunitinib alone was not inferior to CN plus sunitinib, and could be followed by subsequent CN in good-responders patients. CN is found to be a morbid surgery (perioperative mortality rate of 0-13% and major postoperative complications rate of 3-36%) and should be avoided in patients with primary refractory disease, using targeted therapy as a selection tool. Some parameters have been associated with shorter overall survival, leading to propose up-front CN only to patients with good performance status, a high-volume renal tumor and a low metastatic burden. Conclusions > While previous studies demonstrated a survival benefit of CN, the CARMENA trial showed that immediate CN was not necessary in some patients with mRCC, leading to a paradigm shift. Targeted therapy should be proposed as first line treatment, and the response to pre-surgical therapy could be used as a selection tool for subsequent decision of CN in good-responders patients.

Reassessing the Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2019

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) has long been considered a standard of care in the management of mRCC. This is largely based on randomized trials in the era of interferon (IFN) that demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS). With the advent of targeted therapies, the role of CRN has been questioned and multiple retrospective analyses have shown a potential benefit, particularly in intermediate-risk disease. Two long-awaited prospective trials have been published in the past year that explore the role of CRN. The CARMENA trial randomly assigned patients to therapy with sunitinib with or without CRN, showing noninferiority of sunitinib alone versus sunitinib plus CRN with a median OS of 18.4 months versus 13.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for mortality, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.1). The SURTIME trial randomly assigned patients to immediate CRN followed by sunitinib versus a deferred CRN after three cycles of sunitinib. Analysis is limited by early termination as a result of low accrual. Although there was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), median OS was significantly improved among patients in the deferred CRN arm (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; p = .032). Early systemic therapy is paramount, but there are patients who may derive benefit by incorporating the removal of the primary tumor in their multimodal therapy, perhaps in a deferred setting. As systemic treatment paradigms shift and immunotherapy again moves to the frontline setting with the potential for novel therapeutic approaches, the role of CRN will continue to evolve with the potential to offer surgical interventions with minimal, if any, delay in systemic treatment.

Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been the standard of care in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cancer who present with the tumour in place. The CARMENA trial compared systemic therapy alone with CN followed by systemic therapy. This article outlines the new guidelines based on these data. PATIENT SUMMARY: The CARMENA trial demonstrates that immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy should no longer be considered the standard of care in patients diagnosed with intermediate and poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma when medical treatment is required. However, the psychological burden poor risk patients experience hearing that removal of their primary tumour will not be beneficial, should be carefully considered.

Oncologic Outcomes of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Synchronous Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with synchronous metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the electronic medical records of 294 patients with synchronous mRCC treated at Samsung Medical Center from January 2005 to December 2015. Primary and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), respectively. OS and CSS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients with and without CN, particularly by performing 1:1 propensity score matching. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the overall population of synchronous mRCC patients, 189 patients (64.3%) underwent CN. Compared to mRCC patients without CN, those who underwent CN have a higher proportion of single metastasis (63.0% vs. 32.4%) and clear-cell histology (87.8% vs. 72.4%). In the matched cohort, the patients who underwent CN had better OS and CSS outcomes compared to those who did not undergo CN (median OS, 23.0 months vs. 11.0 months; P < .001; median CSS, 34.0 months vs. 14.0 months; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, undergoing CN, body mass index, and Heng risk score were found as significant predictive factors of both OS and CSS. In subgroup analyses stratified by Heng risk criteria, the patients who received CN had better OS and CSS in all risk groups.

CONCLUSION

CN significantly improved survival outcomes in synchronous mRCC patients treated with targeted therapies and independently associated with prolonged survival, regardless of Heng risk criteria.

External validation of a predictive model of survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recent trials have emphasized the importance of a precise patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). In 2013, a nomogram was developed for pre- and postoperative prediction of the probability of death (PoD) after CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To date, the single-institutional nomogram which included mostly patients from the cytokine era has not been externally validated. Our objective is to validate the predictive model in contemporary patients in the targeted therapy era.

METHODS

Multi-institutional European and North American data from patients who underwent CN between 2006 and 2013 were used for external validation. Variables evaluated included preoperative serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase levels, intraoperative blood transfusions (yes/no) and postoperative pathologic stage (primary tumour and nodes). In addition, patient characteristics and MSKCC risk factors were collected. Using the original calibration indices and quantiles of the distribution of predictions, Kaplan-Meier estimates and calibration plots of observed versus predicted PoD were calculated. For the preoperative model a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed.

RESULTS

Of 1108 patients [median OS of 27 months (95% CI 24.6-29.4)], 536 and 469 patients had full data for the validation of the pre- and postoperative models, respectively. The AUC for the pre- and postoperative model was 0.68 (95% CI 0.62-0.74) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78), respectively. In the DCA the preoperative model performs well within threshold survival probabilities of 20-50%. Most important limitation was the retrospective collection of this external validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

In this external validation, the pre- and postoperative nomograms predicting PoD following CN were well calibrated. Although performance of the preoperative nomogram was lower than in the internal validation, it retains the ability to predict early death after CN.

Effect of renal embolization in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of cytoreductive nephrectomy and systemic medical therapy

Objective

To compare survival outcomes for renal embolization (RE) to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and no primary renal treatment (NT) among patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated using either targeted therapy (TT) or immunotherapy (IT).

Results

The median follow-up duration was 81.3 months, with a duration of first-line treatment of 3.5 months. Among the 211 patients, the median PFS and OS were 4.4 and 10.6 months. Specifically for patients receiving TT (124 patients), the PFS and OS were 5.5 and 12.0 months. An intervention effect was identified only for OS, with a median OS of 20.1, 8.8 and 9.3 months for CN, RE and NT, respectively. After stratification by risk classification, CN provided a significant benefit on OS, compared to RE and NT, for patients with an intermediate risk (MSKCC). For those with a poor risk (Heng criteria), NT provided better survival than PFS (p=0.003), and a comparable survival to RE (p > 0.05).

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of 211 patients, 87 treated with IT and 124 with TT, retrieved from our RCC database. Patients' risk factors for survival was evaluated using the Heng and MSKCC criteria, with only patients with an intermediate or poor survival risk included in the analysis. Between-group comparisons were evaluated with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Conclusions

The differential effect of CN and RE on OS appears to be modulated by risk classification. In patients with a poor risk, RE should be implemented after careful consideration of comorbidities and life expectancy.

Deterministic Evolutionary Trajectories Influence Primary Tumor Growth: TRACERx Renal

The evolutionary features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have not been systematically studied to date. We analyzed 1,206 primary tumor regions from 101 patients recruited into the multi-center prospective study, TRACERx Renal. We observe up to 30 driver events per tumor and show that subclonal diversification is associated with known prognostic parameters. By resolving the patterns of driver event ordering, co-occurrence, and mutual exclusivity at clone level, we show the deterministic nature of clonal evolution. ccRCC can be grouped into seven evolutionary subtypes, ranging from tumors characterized by early fixation of multiple mutational and copy number drivers and rapid metastases to highly branched tumors with >10 subclonal drivers and extensive parallel evolution associated with attenuated progression. We identify genetic diversity and chromosomal complexity as determinants of patient outcome. Our insights reconcile the variable clinical behavior of ccRCC and suggest evolutionary potential as a biomarker for both intervention and surveillance.

Tracking Cancer Evolution Reveals Constrained Routes to Metastases: TRACERx Renal

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) exhibits a broad range of metastatic phenotypes that have not been systematically studied to date. Here, we analyzed 575 primary and 335 metastatic biopsies across 100 patients with metastatic ccRCC, including two cases sampledat post-mortem. Metastatic competence was afforded by chromosome complexity, and we identify 9p loss as a highly selected event driving metastasis and ccRCC-related mortality (p = 0.0014). Distinct patterns of metastatic dissemination were observed, including rapid progression to multiple tissue sites seeded by primary tumors of monoclonal structure. By contrast, we observed attenuated progression in cases characterized by high primary tumor heterogeneity, with metastatic competence acquired gradually and initial progression to solitary metastasis. Finally, we observed early divergence of primitive ancestral clones and protracted latency of up to two decades as a feature of pancreatic metastases.

Presurgical pazopanib for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus: a single-institution study

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical benefit of presurgical therapy with pazopanib in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with a tumor thrombus extending to a high level in the vena cava. A retrospective review was performed for seven consecutive patients with RCC and tumor thrombus involving the vena cava above the hepatic vein (level 3-4, Mayo Clinic classification) treated with pazopanib without initial cytoreductive nephrectomy at our institution. The effect of pazopanib was assessed in terms of the primary site response, thrombus diameter, and height (before and after treatment) on computed tomography or MRI. The tumor thrombus level before the induction of pazopanib was 3 in one patient and 4 in the remaining six patients. After pazopanib, shrinkage of the primary site and thrombus diameter and length were observed in all patients except one (with a rhabdoid tumor). The mean decreases of primary tumor diameter, tumor thrombus diameter, and length were 14, 9, and 31 mm, respectively. The tumor thrombus level decreased in three (43%) patients and remained stable in the remaining patient. Our findings suggest that presurgical treatment with pazopanib may shrink the tumor thrombus and decrease the surgical invasiveness in RCC patients with a high-level tumor thrombus.

Prognostic significance of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with systemic cytokine or targeted therapy: A 16-year retrospective analysis

We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among 292 metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients either undergoing nephrectomy (Nx, 61.6%) or not (non-Nx, 38.4%), stratified according to the MSKCC and Heng risk models, treated with either immunotherapy (IT, 45.2%) or targeted therapy (TT, 54.8%) between 2000 and 2015. During the follow-up duration of 16.6 months, PFS/OS of the Nx (6.0/30 months) and non-Nx (3.0/6.0 months) groups were significantly different despite differences among baseline parameters (p < 0.05). The intermediate- and poor-risk patients defined using either model showed significantly longer PFS and OS in the Nx group than in the non-Nx group (p < 0.05). After stratifying groups by systemic therapy and risk models, both the Nx and non-Nx groups showed no significant differences in intermediate and poor-risk models (p > 0.05). In both synchronous and metachronous mRCC patients, both PFS and OS showed similar survivals; the Nx group had significantly longer PFS and OS than the non-Nx group, even after considering each systemic therapy and prognostic model. Nx showed a significant positive benefit in PFS and OS compared to no Nx upon patient stratification according to the MSKCC and Heng risk models. The metastatic type did not significantly affect survival between the two groups.

The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

In this collaborative review article, we reviewed the contemporary literature on the surgical management of metastatic BCa and factors associated with outcomes to support the development of clinical guidelines as well as informed clinical decision-making.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of English language literature using PubMed-Medline and Scopus from 1999 to 2016 was performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The beneficial role of consolidation surgery in metastatic BCa is still unproven. In patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis, data suggest a survival advantage for patients undergoing postchemotherapy radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy, especially in those with measurable response to chemotherapy (CHT). Intraoperatively identified enlarged pelvic lymph nodes should be removed. Anecdotal reports of resection of pulmonary metastasis as part of multimodal approach suggest possible improved survival in well-selected patients. Cytoreductive radical cystectomy as local treatment has also been explored in patients with metastatic disease, although its benefits remain to be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidative extirpative surgery may be considered in patients with clinically evident pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases but only if they have had a response to CHT. Surgery for limited pulmonary metastases may also be considered in very selected cases. Best candidates are those with resectable disease who demonstrate measurable response to CHT with good performance status. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis and decisions made together with the patient and multidisciplinary teams.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Surgical resection of metastases is technically feasible and can be safely performed. It may help improve cancer control and eventually survival in very selected patients with limited metastatic burden. In a patient who is motivated to receive chemotherapy and to undergo extirpative surgical intervention, surgery should be discussed with the patient among other consolidation therapies in the setting of multidisciplinary teams.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy: a bibliographic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), against a background of lack of evidence following the introduction of targeted therapy.

METHODS

A literature review was performed in January 2017 using the MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conduct of the study. Two authors independently screened the 270 papers retrieved from the search, and the finally selected publications were identified by consensus between the two reviewers. A total of 55 studies were included in the present review.

RESULTS

Globally, the indications for CN have decreased over recent years. Although current guidelines consider CN an adequate option in selected patients based on prospective studies in the cytokine era, evidence for CN in the era of targeted therapy is based on retrospective studies only.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of ongoing prospective studies are still awaited. Retrospective data suggest that young male patients with oligometastatic disease and a good performance status can be considered suitable surgical candidates who may benefit from CN.

[When is surgical resection of the primary tumor indicated in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and what is the scientific rationale?]

Cisplatin-based polychemotherapy is still the standard therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, although disease progression is often noted at an early time point even in patients with response. In recent years, cytoreductive surgery has been gaining increasing interest in many tumor entities in the setting of metastatic disease to improve patients outcome, but urothelial carcinoma is not regarded as a candidate for such a multimodal therapy approach. However, several retrospective studies suggest a survival benefit of radical cystectomy and/or metastasectomy for well-selected patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Prognostically relevant parameters for consolidative cystectomy/metastasectomy after chemotherapy seem to be a distinct response to inductive chemotherapy and limited metastatic spread (regional lymph node, single lung metastasis).

Renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) denotes cancer originated from the renal epithelium and accounts for >90% of cancers in the kidney. The disease encompasses >10 histological and molecular subtypes, of which clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is most common and accounts for most cancer-related deaths. Although somatic VHL mutations have been described for some time, more-recent cancer genomic studies have identified mutations in epigenetic regulatory genes and demonstrated marked intra-tumour heterogeneity, which could have prognostic, predictive and therapeutic relevance. Localized RCC can be successfully managed with surgery, whereas metastatic RCC is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. However, over the past decade, marked advances in the treatment of metastatic RCC have been made, with targeted agents including sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, pazopanib and axitinib, which inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR), and everolimus and temsirolimus, which inhibit mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), being approved. Since 2015, agents with additional targets aside from VEGFR have been approved, such as cabozantinib and lenvatinib; immunotherapies, such as nivolumab, have also been added to the armamentarium for metastatic RCC. Here, we provide an overview of the biology of RCC, with a focus on ccRCC, as well as updates to complement the current clinical guidelines and an outline of potential future directions for RCC research and therapy.