1
|
Saliby RM, Labaki C, Jammihal TR, Xie W, Sun M, Shah V, Saad E, Kane MH, Kashima S, Sadak K, El Zarif T, Poduval D, Motzer RJ, Powles T, Rini BI, Albiges L, Pal SK, McGregor BA, McKay RR, Signoretti S, Van Allen EM, Shukla SA, Choueiri TK, Braun DA. Impact of renal cell carcinoma molecular subtypes on immunotherapy and targeted therapy outcomes. Cancer Cell 2024:S1535-6108(24)00087-4. [PMID: 38579722 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Saliby et al. show that a machine learning approach can accurately classify clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into distinct molecular subtypes using transcriptomic data. When applied to tumors biospecimens from the JAVELIN Renal 101 (JR101) trial, a benefit is observed with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy across all molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Maria Saliby
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maxine Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valisha Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eddy Saad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Harry Kane
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Soki Kashima
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Katherine Sadak
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Deepak Poduval
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Robert J Motzer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute and the Royal Free Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Brian I Rini
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sachet A Shukla
- Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - David A Braun
- Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology (CMCO), Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ravi P, Freeman D, Thomas J, Ravi A, Mantia C, McGregor BA, Berchuck JE, Epstein I, Budde P, Ahangarian Abhari B, Rupieper E, Gajewski J, Schubert AS, Kilian AL, Bräutigam M, Zucht HD, Sonpavde G. Comprehensive multiplexed autoantibody profiling of patients with advanced urothelial cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008215. [PMID: 38309723 PMCID: PMC10840035 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive profiling of autoantibodies (AAbs) in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has not been performed to date. This may aid in diagnosis of UC, uncover novel therapeutic targets in this disease as well as identify associations between AAbs and response and toxicity to systemic therapies. METHODS We used serum from patients with mUC collected prior to and after systemic therapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC)) at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. 38 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) from healthy blood donors were also evaluated. The SeroTag immuno-oncology discovery array (Oncimmune) was used, with quantification of the AAb reactivity toward 1132 antigens. Bound AAbs were detected using an anti-immunoglobulin G-specific detection antibody conjugated to the fluorescent reporter dye phycoerythrin. The AAb reactivity was reported as the median fluorescence intensity for each color and sample using a Luminex FlexMAP3D analyzer. Clinical outcomes of interest included radiographic response and development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Significance analysis of microarray was used to compare mUC versus HC and radiographic response. Associations with irAE were evaluated using a logistic regression model. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS 66 patients were included with a median age of 68 years; 54 patients (82%) received ICI and 12 patients (18%) received PBC. Compared with HCs, AAbs against the cancer/testis antigens (CTAG1B, CTAG2, MAGEB18), HSPA1A, TP53, KRAS, and FGFR3 were significantly elevated in patients with mUC. AAbs against BRCA2, TP53, and CTNBB1 were associated with response, and those against BICD2 and UACA were associated with resistance to ICI therapy. AAbs against MITF, CDH3, and KDM4A were associated with development of irAEs in patient who received an ICI. A higher variance in pre-to-post treatment fold change in AAb levels was seen in patients treated with ICI versus PBC and was associated with response to ICI. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of comprehensive AAb profiling of patients with mUC and identified key AAbs that were elevated in patients with mUC versus HCs as well as AAbs associated with therapeutic response to ICI. These findings are hypothesis generating and further mechanistic studies evaluating humoral immunity in UC are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dory Freeman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Arvind Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ilana Epstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Guru Sonpavde
- AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berg SA, McGregor BA. One Size Fits Some: Approaching Rare Malignancies of the Urinary Tract. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:206-219. [PMID: 38315403 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01187-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Urothelial carcinoma is the predominant cancer of the urinary tract but when divergent and subtype histology (non-urothelial) are identified at time of pathologic diagnosis, therapeutic and diagnostic challenges transpire. To this end, pathologic review to confirm any non-urothelial histology is key since these subtypes can often be overlooked. Few prospective trials are dedicated to understanding these non-urothelial histologic types; however, current, and past trials did allow patients with these non-urothelial histologic types to enroll, and inferences can be made about treatment efficacy and survival. Existing treatment regimens for non-urothelial bladder cancers are akin to standard urothelial cancer regimens using surgical approaches for localized disease and platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced disease. The reported clinical trials, that will be discussed, center on non-urothelial histologic types. These studies, albeit limited, provide critical insight into tumor biology and response to standard platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates. The inclusion of non-urothelial histologic types will be essential for clinical trials in development to provide further therapeutic advances and provide essential efficacy data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Berg
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McGregor BA, Sonpavde GP, Kwak L, Regan MM, Gao X, Hvidsten H, Mantia CM, Wei XX, Berchuck JE, Berg SA, Ravi PK, Michaelson MD, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J. The Double Antibody Drug Conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: sacituzumab govitecan plus enfortumab vedotin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:91-97. [PMID: 37871703 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) are standard monotherapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Given the different targets and payloads, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SG + EV in a phase I trial in mUC (NCT04724018). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with mUC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 who had progressed on platinum and/or immunotherapy were enrolled. SG + EV were administered on days 1 + 8 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. The number of patients treated at each of four pre-specified dose levels (DLs) and the maximum tolerated doses in combination (MTD) were determined using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Between May 2021 and April 2023, 24 patients were enrolled; 1 patient never started therapy and was excluded from the analysis. Median age was 70 years (range 41-88 years); 11 patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) regardless of attribution at any DL, with one grade 5 AE (pneumonitis possibly related to EV). The recommended phase II doses are SG 8 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support; MTDs are SG 10 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg. The objective response rate was 70% (16/23, 95% confidence interval 47% to 87%) with three complete responses; three patients had progressive disease as best response. With a median follow-up of 14 months, 9/23 patients have ongoing response including 6 responses lasting over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SG + EV was assessed at different DLs and a safe dose for phase II was identified. The combination had encouraging activity in patients with mUC with high response rates, including clinically significant complete responses. Additional study of this combination is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A McGregor
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
| | - G P Sonpavde
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Advent Health Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando
| | - L Kwak
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - M M Regan
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - X Gao
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H Hvidsten
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - C M Mantia
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - X X Wei
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J E Berchuck
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S A Berg
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - P K Ravi
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - M D Michaelson
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - T K Choueiri
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Bellmunt
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albiges L, McGregor BA, Heng DYC, Procopio G, de Velasco G, Taguieva-Pioger N, Martín-Couce L, Tannir NM, Powles T. Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102652. [PMID: 37980876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted (anti-VEGF) treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy. METHODS This was a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review; registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021255568). Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 28, 2021; updated September 13, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability evidence for anti-VEGF treatment in patients with RCC who had received prior CPI therapy. RESULTS Of 2,639 publications screened, 48 were eligible and featured 2,759 patients treated in trials and 2,209 in real-world studies (RWS). Most patients with available data were treated with anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens (trials: 93 %; RWS: 100 %), most commonly cabozantinib, which accounted for 46 % of trial and 62 % of RWS patients in publications with available data. Collectively, there was consistent evidence of anti-VEGF treatment activity after prior CPI therapy. Activity was reported for all anti-VEGF regimens and regardless of prior CPI-based regimen. No new safety signals were detected for subsequent anti-VEGF therapy; no studies suggested increased immune-related adverse events associated with prior CPI therapy. The results were limited by data quality; study heterogeneity prohibited meta-analyses. CONCLUSION Based on the available data (most commonly for cabozantinib), anti-VEGF therapy appears to be a rational treatment choice in patients with RCC who have progressed despite prior CPI-based therapy. Results from ongoing trials of combination anti-VEGF plus CPI regimen post prior CPI therapy trials will contribute more definitive evidence. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Anticancer treatments that work by reducing levels of a substance in the body called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor are known as anti-VEGF drugs. Reducing VEGF levels helps to reduce blood supply to tumors, which can slow the speed at which the cancer grows. Some other types of anticancer drugs that help the immune system to fight cancer cells are called checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we looked at published studies that investigated how anti-VEGF drugs work, and what side effects they cause, in people who have already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors for a type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to summarize the available evidence to help doctors decide how best to use anti-VEGF drugs in these patients. We found 48 studies that included almost 5,000 patients. The results of the studies showed that anti-VEGF drugs have anticancer effects in people with renal cell carcinoma who had already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors. All of the VEGF-targeting drugs had anticancer effects, irrespective of what checkpoint inhibitor treatment people had received before. There were different amounts of evidence available for the different anti-VEGF drugs. The anti-VEGF cabozantinib had the largest amount of evidence. Importantly, previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment did not seem to affect the number or type of side-effects associated with anti-VEGF drugs. Results from ongoing, well-designed studies will be helpful to confirm these results. Our findings may be useful for doctors considering using anti-VEGF drugs in patients with renal cell carcinoma who have received checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Guillermo de Velasco
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Department of Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McGregor BA. Highlights in metastatic urothelial cancer from the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2023: commentary. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2023; 21 Suppl 6:15-17. [PMID: 38307621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rana HQ, Stopfer JE, Weitz M, Kipnis L, Koeller DR, Culver S, Mercado J, Gelman RS, Underhill-Blazey M, McGregor BA, Sweeney CJ, Petrucelli N, Kokenakes C, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Reys B, Frazier A, Knechtl A, Fateh S, Vatnick DR, Silver R, Kilbridge KE, Pomerantz MM, Wei XX, Choudhury AD, Sonpavde GP, Kozyreva O, Lathan C, Horton C, Dolinsky JS, Heath EI, Ross TS, Courtney KD, Garber JE, Taplin ME. Pretest Video Education Versus Genetic Counseling for Patients With Prostate Cancer: ProGen, A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:1069-1079. [PMID: 37733980 PMCID: PMC10667014 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for men with prostate cancer (PC), but testing through traditional models is limited. The ProGen study examined a novel model aimed at providing access to GT while promoting education and informed consent. METHODS Men with potentially lethal PC (metastatic, localized with a Gleason score of ≥8, persistent prostate-specific antigen after local therapy), diagnosis age ≤55 years, previous malignancy, and family history suggestive of a pathogenic variant (PV) and/or at oncologist's discretion were randomly assigned 3:1 to video education (VE) or in-person genetic counseling (GC). Participants had 67 genes analyzed (Ambry), with results disclosed via telephone by a genetic counselor. Outcomes included GT consent, GT completion, PV prevalence, and survey measures of satisfaction, psychological impact, genetics knowledge, and family communication. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used for between-arm comparisons. RESULTS Over a 2-year period, 662 participants at three sites were randomly assigned and pretest VE (n = 498) or GC (n = 164) was completed by 604 participants (VE, 93.1%; GC, 88.8%), of whom 596 participants (VE, 98.9%; GC, 97.9%) consented to GT and 591 participants completed GT (VE, 99.3%; GC, 98.6%). These differences were not statistically significant although subtle differences in satisfaction and psychological impact were. Notably, 84 PVs were identified in 78 participants (13.2%), with BRCA1/2 PV comprising 32% of participants with a positive result (BRCA2 n = 21, BRCA1 n = 4). CONCLUSION Both VE and traditional GC yielded high GT uptake without significant differences in outcome measures of completion, GT uptake, genetics knowledge, and family communication. The increased demand for GT with limited genetics resources supports consideration of pretest VE for patients with PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huma Q Rana
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle Weitz
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay Kipnis
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Diane R Koeller
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Samantha Culver
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joanna Mercado
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Meghan Underhill-Blazey
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Brian Reys
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arthur Frazier
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | - Andrew Knechtl
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | - Salman Fateh
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | | | - Rebecca Silver
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kerry E Kilbridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark M Pomerantz
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Xiao X Wei
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Atish D Choudhury
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Judy E Garber
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McGregor BA, Choueiri TK. Renal Cell Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:xvii-xix. [PMID: 37330344 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saliby RM, El Zarif T, Bakouny Z, Shah V, Xie W, Flippot R, Denize T, Kane MH, Madsen KN, Ficial M, Hirsch L, Wei XX, Steinharter JA, Harshman LC, Vaishampayan UN, Severgnini M, McDermott DF, Mary Lee GS, Xu W, Van Allen EM, McGregor BA, Signoretti S, Choueiri TK, McKay RR, Braun DA. Circulating and Intratumoral Immune Determinants of Response to Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Variant Histology or Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:1114-1124. [PMID: 37279009 PMCID: PMC10526700 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-22-0996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of variant histology comprises approximately 20% of kidney cancer diagnoses, yet the optimal therapy for these patients and the factors that impact immunotherapy response remain largely unknown. To better understand the determinants of immunotherapy response in this population, we characterized blood- and tissue-based immune markers for patients with variant histology RCC, or any RCC histology with sarcomatoid differentiation, enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Baseline circulating (plasma) inflammatory cytokines were highly correlated with one another, forming an "inflammatory module" that was increased in International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium poor-risk patients and was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.028). At baseline, an elevated circulating vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) level was associated with a lack of response (P = 0.03) and worse PFS (P = 0.021). However, a larger increase in on-treatment levels of circulating VEGF-A was associated with clinical benefit (P = 0.01) and improved overall survival (P = 0.0058). Among peripheral immune cell populations, an on-treatment decrease in circulating PD-L1+ T cells was associated with improved outcomes, with a reduction in CD4+PD-L1+ [HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.91; P = 0.016] and CD8+PD-L1+ T cells (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87; P = 0.009) correlated with improved PFS. Within the tumor itself, a higher percentage of terminally exhausted (PD-1+ and either TIM-3+ or LAG-3+) CD8+ T cells was associated with worse PFS (P = 0.028). Overall, these findings support the value of tumor and blood-based immune assessments in determining therapeutic benefit for patients with RCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and provide a foundation for future biomarker studies for patients with variant histology RCC receiving immunotherapy-based combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Maria Saliby
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Talal El Zarif
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Valisha Shah
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Denize
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - M. Harry Kane
- Yale Center of Cellular and Molecular Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Katrine N. Madsen
- Yale Center of Cellular and Molecular Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Miriam Ficial
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Xiao X. Wei
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - John A. Steinharter
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
| | - Lauren C. Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Surface Oncology, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
| | - Ulka N. Vaishampayan
- University of Michigan/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201 USA
| | - Mariano Severgnini
- Center for Immuno-Oncology Immune Assessment Laboratory at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - David F. McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Gwo-Shu Mary Lee
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Eliezer M. Van Allen
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Bradley A. McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - David A. Braun
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Yale Center of Cellular and Molecular Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gagliano-Jucá T, Hirsch MS, McGregor BA, Basaria S. Failure of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Due to Ectopic hCG Secretion. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:660-662. [PMID: 36791169 DOI: 10.1056/nejmc2213461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
|
11
|
Navani V, Wells JC, Boyne DJ, Cheung WY, Brenner DM, McGregor BA, Labaki C, Schmidt AL, McKay RR, Meza L, Pal SK, Donskov F, Beuselinck B, Otiato M, Ludwig L, Powles T, Szabados BE, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC. CABOSEQ: The Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in Patients With Treatment Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 35945133 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data evaluating the activity of cabozantinib (CABO) as second line (2L) therapy post standard of care ipilimumab-nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) or immuno-oncology(IO)/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (VEGFi) combinations (IOVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the IMDC database, we sought to identify the objective response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) of 2L CABO after IPI-NIVO, IOVE combinations, pazopanib or sunitinib (PAZ/SUN) or other first line (1L) therapies. Multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for underlying differences in IMDC groups, was used to compare differences in OS for 2L CABO based on preceding therapy. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-six patients received 2L CABO (78 post IPI NIVO, 46 post IOVE, 161 post PAZ/SUN, 61 post Other). Of the entire cohort, 12.6%, 62.6%, and 24.8% were IMDC favourable, intermediate, and poor risk, respectively. Patients that received 1L IPI-NIVO had a median OS of 21.4 (95% CI, 12.1 - NE [Not evaluable]) months compared to 15.7 (95% CI, 9.3 - NE) months in 1L IOVE and 20.7 (95% CI, 15.6 - 35.6) months in 1L PAZ/SUN, P = .28. Median TTF from the initiation of 2L CABO in the overall population was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.6 - 9.0) months. We were unable to detect a significant difference in 2L CABO OS based on type of 1L therapy received: 1L IPI-NIVO (reference group) vs. 1L IOVE HR 1.73 (95% CI, 0.83 - 3.62 P = .14), 1L PAZ/SUN 1.16 (95% CI, 0.67 - 2.00 P = .60), however given the retrospective observational nature of this work a lack of sufficient power may contribute to this. CONCLUSION In a large real world dataset, we identified clinically meaningful activity of 2L CABO after all evaluated contemporary 1L therapies, irrespective of whether the 1L regimen included a VEGFi. These are real world benchmarks with which to counsel our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Winson Y Cheung
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Rana R McKay
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, United States
| | - Luis Meza
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
| | - Frede Donskov
- University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hasanov E, Yeboa DN, Tucker MD, Swanson TA, Beckham TH, Rini B, Ene CI, Hasanov M, Derks S, Smits M, Dudani S, Heng DYC, Brastianos PK, Bex A, Hanalioglu S, Weinberg JS, Hirsch L, Carlo MI, Aizer A, Brown PD, Bilen MA, Chang EL, Jaboin J, Brugarolas J, Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, McGregor BA, Halasz LM, Patel TR, Soltys SG, McDermott DF, Elder JB, Baskaya MK, Yu JB, Timmerman R, Kim MM, Mut M, Markert J, Beal K, Tannir NM, Samandouras G, Lang FF, Giles R, Jonasch E. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:454-489. [PMID: 35708940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mathew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Hendrix Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Rini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merve Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophie Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sahin Hanalioglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul David Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Lin Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles
| | - Jerry Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Toral R Patel
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - David F McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mustafa K Baskaya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Miran Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - James Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Samandouras
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Giles
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, Duivendrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ravi P, Ravi A, Riaz IB, Freeman D, Curran C, Mantia C, McGregor BA, Kilbridge KL, Pan CX, Pek M, Choudhury Y, Tan MH, Sonpavde GP. Longitudinal Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Sensitive Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing to Identify Resistance Mechanisms to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Oncologist 2022; 27:e406-e409. [PMID: 35294031 PMCID: PMC9074964 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Serial evaluation of circulating tumor DNA may allow noninvasive assessment of drivers of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). We used a novel, amplicon-based next-generation sequencing assay to identify genomic alterations (GAs) pre- and post-therapy in 39 patients with aUC receiving ICI and 6 receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). One or more GA was seen in 95% and 100% of pre- and post-ICI samples, respectively, commonly in TP53 (54% and 54%), TERT (49% and 59%), and BRCA1/BRCA2 (33% and 33%). Clearance of ≥1 GA was seen in 7 of 9 patients responding to ICI, commonly in TP53 (n = 4), PIK3CA (n = 2), and BRCA1/BRCA2 (n = 2). A new GA was seen in 17 of 20 patients progressing on ICI, frequently in BRCA1/BRCA2 (n = 6), PIK3CA (n = 3), and TP53 (n = 3), which seldom emerged in patients receiving PBC. These findings highlight the potential for longitudinal circulating tumor DNA evaluation in tracking response and resistance to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arvind Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bilen MA, Rini BI, Voss MH, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Albiges L, Pagliaro LC, Voog EG, Lam ET, Kislov N, McGregor BA, Lalani AKA, Huang B, di Pietro A, Krulewicz S, Robbins PB, Choueiri TK. Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Efficacy of First-Line Avelumab plus Axitinib vs. Sunitinib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Enrolled in the Phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:738-747. [PMID: 34789480 PMCID: PMC9377757 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Adult patients with untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a clear-cell component, ≥1 measurable lesions, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, fresh or archival tumor specimen, and adequate renal, cardiac, and hepatic function were included. Retrospective analyses of the association between baseline NLR and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib arms were performed using the first interim analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006). Multivariate Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS were conducted. Translational data were assessed to elucidate the underlying biology associated with differences in NLR. RESULTS Patients with below-median NLR had longer observed PFS with avelumab plus axitinib [stratified HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.634-1.153] or sunitinib (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.415-0.745). In the avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib arms, respectively, median PFS was 13.8 and 11.2 months in patients with below-median NLR, and 13.3 and 5.6 months in patients with median-or-higher NLR. Below-median NLR was also associated with longer observed OS in the avelumab plus axitinib (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.300-0.871) and sunitinib arms (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.174-0.511). Tumor analyses showed an association between NLR and key biological characteristics, suggesting a role of NLR in underlying mechanisms influencing clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS Current data support NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with advanced RCC receiving avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet A. Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Corresponding Author: Mehmet A. Bilen, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365B Clifton Road NE, Suite B4000, Office 4212, Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: 404–778–3693; E-mail:
| | - Brian I. Rini
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Martin H. Voss
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James Larkin
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - John B.A.G. Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Elaine T. Lam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Nikolay Kislov
- Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Oncological Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
McGregor BA, Xie W, Adib E, Stadler WM, Zakharia Y, Alva A, Michaelson MD, Gupta S, Lam ET, Farah S, Nassar AH, Wei XX, Kilbridge KL, Harshman L, Signoretti S, Sholl L, Kwiatkowski DJ, McKay RR, Choueiri TK. Biomarker-Based Phase II Study of Sapanisertib (TAK-228): An mTORC1/2 Inhibitor in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100448. [PMID: 35171658 PMCID: PMC8865529 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Sapanisertib is a kinase inhibitor that inhibits both mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of sapanisertib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC; NCT03097328). METHODS Patients with mRCC of any histology progressing through standard therapy (including prior mTOR inhibitors) had baseline biopsy and received sapanisertib 30 mg by mouth once weekly until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. Tissue biomarkers of mTOR pathway activation were explored. RESULTS We enrolled 38 patients with mRCC (clear cell = 28; variant histology = 10) between August 2017 and November 2019. Twenty-four (63%) had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy; 17 (45%) had received prior rapalog therapy. The median follow-up was 10.4 (range 1-27.4) months. Objective response rate was two of 38 (5.3%; 90% CI, 1 to 15.6); the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.7). Twelve patients (32%) developed treatment-related grade 3 adverse events, with no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Alterations in the mTOR pathway genes were seen in 5 of 29 evaluable patients (MTOR n = 1, PTEN n = 3, and TSC1 n = 1) with no association with response or PFS. Diminished or loss of PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry was seen in 8 of 21 patients and trended toward shorter PFS compared with intact PTEN (median 1.9 v 3.7 months; hazard ratio 2.5; 95% CI, 0.9 to 6.7; P = .055). CONCLUSION Sapanisertib had minimal activity in treatment-refractory mRCC independent of mTOR pathway alterations. Additional therapeutic strategies are needed for patients with refractory mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elio Adib
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bakouny Z, Sadagopan A, Ravi P, Metaferia NY, Li J, AbuHammad S, Tang S, Denize T, Garner ER, Gao X, Braun DA, Hirsch L, Steinharter JA, Bouchard G, Walton E, West D, Labaki C, Dudani S, Gan CL, Sethunath V, Carvalho FLF, Imamovic A, Ricker C, Vokes NI, Nyman J, Berchuck JE, Park J, Hirsch MS, Haq R, Mary Lee GS, McGregor BA, Chang SL, Feldman AS, Wu CJ, McDermott DF, Heng DY, Signoretti S, Van Allen EM, Choueiri TK, Viswanathan SR. Integrative clinical and molecular characterization of translocation renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep 2022; 38:110190. [PMID: 34986355 PMCID: PMC9127595 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a poorly characterized subtype of kidney cancer driven by MiT/TFE gene fusions. Here, we define the landmarks of tRCC through an integrative analysis of 152 patients with tRCC identified across genomic, clinical trial, and retrospective cohorts. Most tRCCs harbor few somatic alterations apart from MiT/TFE fusions and homozygous deletions at chromosome 9p21.3 (19.2% of cases). Transcriptionally, tRCCs display a heightened NRF2-driven antioxidant response that is associated with resistance to targeted therapies. Consistently, we find that outcomes for patients with tRCC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are worse than those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Using multiparametric immunofluorescence, we find that the tumors are infiltrated with CD8+ T cells, though the T cells harbor an exhaustion immunophenotype distinct from that of clear cell RCC. Our findings comprehensively define the clinical and molecular features of tRCC and may inspire new therapeutic hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ananthan Sadagopan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Praful Ravi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shatha AbuHammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Tang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Denize
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma R. Garner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xin Gao
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A. Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Yale Cancer Center / Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John A. Steinharter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bouchard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Walton
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Destiny West
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Chun-Loo Gan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Alma Imamovic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cora Ricker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalie I. Vokes
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology; Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jackson Nyman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob E. Berchuck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michelle S. Hirsch
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rizwan Haq
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gwo-Shu Mary Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A. McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L. Chang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S. Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine J. Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel Y.C. Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eliezer M. Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Corresponding authors: Toni K. Choueiri, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215 (). Tel: +1 617-632-5456, Srinivas R. Viswanathan, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215 (). Tel: +1 617-632-2429
| | - Srinivas R. Viswanathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Corresponding authors: Toni K. Choueiri, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215 (). Tel: +1 617-632-5456, Srinivas R. Viswanathan, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215 (). Tel: +1 617-632-2429
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tripathi A, Lin E, Xie W, Flaifel A, Steinharter JA, Stern Gatof EN, Bouchard G, Fleischer JH, Martinez-Chanza N, Gray C, Mantia C, Thompson L, Wei XX, Giannakis M, McGregor BA, Choueiri TK, Agarwal N, McDermott DF, Signoretti S, Harshman LC. Prognostic significance and immune correlates of CD73 expression in renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2020-001467. [PMID: 33177176 PMCID: PMC7661372 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background CD73–adenosine signaling in the tumor microenvironment is immunosuppressive and may be associated with aggressive renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the prognostic significance of CD73 protein expression in RCC leveraging nephrectomy samples. We also performed a complementary analysis using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset to evaluate the correlation of CD73 (ecto-5′-nucleotidase (NT5E), CD39 (ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (ENTPD1)) and A2 adenosine receptor (A2AR; ADORA2A) transcript levels with markers of angiogenesis and antitumor immune response. Methods Patients with RCC with available archived nephrectomy samples were eligible for inclusion. Tumor CD73 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry and quantified using a combined score (CS: % positive cells×intensity). Samples were categorized as CD73negative (CS=0), CD73low or CD73high (< and ≥median CS, respectively). Multivariable Cox regression analysis compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between CD73 expression groups. In the TCGA dataset, samples were categorized as low, intermediate and high NT5E, ENTPD1 and ADORA2A gene expression groups. Gene expression signatures for infiltrating immune cells, angiogenesis, myeloid inflammation, and effector T-cell response were compared between NT5E, ENTPD1 and ADORA2A expression groups. Results Among the 138 patients eligible for inclusion, ‘any’ CD73 expression was observed in 30% of primary tumor samples. High CD73 expression was more frequent in patients with M1 RCC (29% vs 12% M0), grade 4 tumors (27% vs 13% grade 3 vs 15% grades 1 and 2), advanced T-stage (≥T3: 22% vs T2: 19% vs T1: 12%) and tumors with sarcomatoid histology (50% vs 12%). In the M0 cohort (n=107), patients with CD73high tumor expression had significantly worse 5-year DFS (42%) and 10-year OS (22%) compared with those in the CD73negative group (DFS: 75%, adjusted HR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.9, p=0.01; OS: 64%, adjusted HR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.8, p=0.02) independent of tumor stage and grade. In the TCGA analysis, high NT5E expression was associated with significantly worse 5-year OS (p=0.008). NT5E and ENTPD1 expression correlated with higher regulatory T cell (Treg) signature, while ADORA2A expression was associated with increased Treg and angiogenesis signatures. Conclusions High CD73 expression portends significantly worse survival outcomes independent of stage and grade. Our findings provide compelling support for targeting the immunosuppressive and proangiogenic CD73–adenosine pathway in RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Tripathi
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.,Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edwin Lin
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - John A Steinharter
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Gabrielle Bouchard
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Justin H Fleischer
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nieves Martinez-Chanza
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Connor Gray
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charlene Mantia
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Linda Thompson
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Xiao X Wei
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Lauren C Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nuzzo PV, Pond GR, Abou Alaiwi S, Nassar AH, Flippot R, Curran C, Kilbridge KL, Wei XX, McGregor BA, Choueiri T, Harshman LC, Sonpavde G. Conditional immune toxicity rate in patients with metastatic renal and urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 8:jitc-2019-000371. [PMID: 32234849 PMCID: PMC7174062 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although the incidence and prevalence of irAEs have been well characterized in the literature, less is known about the cumulative incidence rate of irAEs. We studied the cumulative incidence of irAEs, defined as the probability of irAE occurrence over time and the risk factors for irAE development in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with ICIs. Methods We identified a cohort of patients who received ICIs for mUC and mRCC. irAEs were classified using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) V.5.0 guidelines. The monthly incidence of irAEs over time was reported after landmark duration of therapy. Cumulative incidence of irAEs was calculated to evaluate the time to the first occurrence of an irAE accounting for the competing risk of death. Prognostic factors for irAE were assessed using the Fine and Gray method. Results A total of 470 patients were treated with ICIs between July 2013 and October 2018 (mUC: 199 (42.3%); mRCC: 271 (57.7%)). 341 (72.6%) patients received monotherapy, 86 (18.3%) received ICIs in combination with targeted therapies, and 43 (9.2%) received dual ICI therapy. Overall, 186 patients (39.5%) experienced an irAE at any time point. Common irAEs included hypothyroidism (n=42, 22.6%), rush and pruritus (n=36, 19.4%), diarrhea/colitis (n=35, 18.8%), transaminitis (n=32, 17.2%), and pneumonitis (n=14, 7.5%). Monthly incidence rates decreased over time; however, 17 of 109 (15.6%, 95% CI: 9.4% to 23.8%) experienced their first irAE at least 1 year after treatment initiation. No differences in cumulative incidence were observed based on cancer type, agent, or irAE grade. On multivariable analysis, combined ICI therapy with another ICI or with targeted therapy (p<0.001), first-line ICI therapy (p=0.011), and PD-1 inhibitor therapy (p=0.007) were all significantly associated with irAE development. Conclusions This study quantitates the incidence of developing irAEs due to ICI conditioned on time elapsed without irAE development. Although the monthly incidence of irAEs decreased over time on therapy, patients can still develop delayed irAEs beyond ICI discontinuation, and thus, continuous vigilant monitoring is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Vitale Nuzzo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine Curran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kerry L Kilbridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Xiao X Wei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Toni Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren C Harshman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Montazeri K, Dranitsaris G, Thomas JD, Curran C, Preston MA, Steele GS, Kilbridge KL, Mantia C, Ravi P, McGregor BA, Mossanen M, Sonpavde G. An economic analysis comparing health care resource use and cost of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:834.e1-834.e7. [PMID: 34162500 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (ddMVAC) and gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS Patient treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2010 to 2019 were identified. HRU data on chemotherapy administered, supportive medications, patient monitoring, clinic, infusion, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization were collected retrospectively. Unit costs for HRU components were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Website and HRU was compared between groups using quantile regression analysis. RESULTS 137 patients were included; 51 received ddMVAC and 86 GC. Baseline characteristics were similar, except lower mean age (P < 0.001) and higher proportion of ECOG-PS = 0 (P < 0.001) for ddMVAC. ddMVAC required more granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support (P < 0.001), central line placement (P = 0.017), cardiac imaging (P < 0.001), and infusion visits (P < 0.001), whereas GC required more clinic visits. ED visits were higher for ddMVAC (P = 0.048), while chemotherapy cycle delays and hospitalization days were higher for GC (P = 0.008). After adjusting for ECOG-PS and age, the cost per patient was approximately 41% lower (95%CI: 28% to 52%; P < 0.001) for GC vs. ddMVAC, which translated to a median adjusted cost savings of $7,410 (95%CI: $5,474-$9,347) per patient. CONCLUSIONS Although excess HRU did not clearly favor one regimen, adjusting for PS and age indicated lower costs with GC vs. ddMVAC. Given the similar cumulative cisplatin delivery with both regimens, the associated values and costs supports the preferential selection of GC in the neoadjuvant setting of MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Montazeri
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - J D Thomas
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - C Curran
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - M A Preston
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - G S Steele
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - K L Kilbridge
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - C Mantia
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - P Ravi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - B A McGregor
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - M Mossanen
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - G Sonpavde
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Braun DA, Street K, Burke KP, Cookmeyer DL, Denize T, Pedersen CB, Gohil SH, Schindler N, Pomerance L, Hirsch L, Bakouny Z, Hou Y, Forman J, Huang T, Li S, Cui A, Keskin DB, Steinharter J, Bouchard G, Sun M, Pimenta EM, Xu W, Mahoney KM, McGregor BA, Hirsch MS, Chang SL, Livak KJ, McDermott DF, Shukla SA, Olsen LR, Signoretti S, Sharpe AH, Irizarry RA, Choueiri TK, Wu CJ. Progressive immune dysfunction with advancing disease stage in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2021; 39:632-648.e8. [PMID: 33711273 PMCID: PMC8138872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The tumor immune microenvironment plays a critical role in cancer progression and response to immunotherapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), yet the composition and phenotypic states of immune cells in this tumor are incompletely characterized. We performed single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing on 164,722 individual cells from tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissue in patients with ccRCC across disease stages: early, locally advanced, and advanced/metastatic. Terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells were enriched in metastatic disease and were restricted in T cell receptor diversity. Within the myeloid compartment, pro-inflammatory macrophages were decreased, and suppressive M2-like macrophages were increased in advanced disease. Terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells and M2-like macrophages co-occurred in advanced disease and expressed ligands and receptors that support T cell dysfunction and M2-like polarization. This immune dysfunction circuit is associated with a worse prognosis in external cohorts and identifies potentially targetable immune inhibitory pathways in ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Kelly Street
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kelly P Burke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - David L Cookmeyer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Thomas Denize
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Christina B Pedersen
- Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Satyen H Gohil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Academic Hematology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Schindler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Lucas Pomerance
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Yue Hou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Juliet Forman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Teddy Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Shuqiang Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ang Cui
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Derin B Keskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - John Steinharter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bouchard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Maxine Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Erica M Pimenta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kathleen M Mahoney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michelle S Hirsch
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kenneth J Livak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - David F McDermott
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Sachet A Shukla
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Lars R Olsen
- Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Arlene H Sharpe
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Rafael A Irizarry
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Catherine J Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bi K, He MX, Bakouny Z, Kanodia A, Napolitano S, Wu J, Grimaldi G, Braun DA, Cuoco MS, Mayorga A, DelloStritto L, Bouchard G, Steinharter J, Tewari AK, Vokes NI, Shannon E, Sun M, Park J, Chang SL, McGregor BA, Haq R, Denize T, Signoretti S, Guerriero JL, Vigneau S, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Rotem A, Regev A, Choueiri TK, Van Allen EM. Tumor and immune reprogramming during immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2021; 39:649-661.e5. [PMID: 33711272 PMCID: PMC8115394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) results in durable disease control in a subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but mechanisms driving resistance are poorly understood. We characterize the single-cell transcriptomes of cancer and immune cells from metastatic RCC patients before or after ICB exposure. In responders, subsets of cytotoxic T cells express higher levels of co-inhibitory receptors and effector molecules. Macrophages from treated biopsies shift toward pro-inflammatory states in response to an interferon-rich microenvironment but also upregulate immunosuppressive markers. In cancer cells, we identify bifurcation into two subpopulations differing in angiogenic signaling and upregulation of immunosuppressive programs after ICB. Expression signatures for cancer cell subpopulations and immune evasion are associated with PBRM1 mutation and survival in primary and ICB-treated advanced RCC. Our findings demonstrate that ICB remodels the RCC microenvironment and modifies the interplay between cancer and immune cell populations critical for understanding response and resistance to ICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Meng Xiao He
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Graduate Program in Biophysics, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Abhay Kanodia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Sara Napolitano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Jingyi Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Grace Grimaldi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - David A Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael S Cuoco
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Angie Mayorga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Laura DelloStritto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bouchard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - John Steinharter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Alok K Tewari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Natalie I Vokes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Erin Shannon
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Maxine Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Rizwan Haq
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Thomas Denize
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jennifer L Guerriero
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Breast Tumor Immunology Laboratory, Women's Cancer Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Sébastien Vigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | - Asaf Rotem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Aviv Regev
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Cancer Genomics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McGregor BA, Sonpavde GP. New Insights into the Molecular Profile of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2375-2377. [PMID: 33653819 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Genomic alterations in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) appear similar to squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and esophagus but not lung, skin, bladder, and cervix. PSCCs display genomic heterogeneity, low mutation burden, and potentially actionable alterations in the Notch, DNA repair, kinase, and cell-cycle pathways.See related article by Chahoud et al., p. 2560.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ravi P, Pond GR, Diamantopoulos LN, Su C, Alva A, Jain RK, Skelton WP, Gupta S, Tward JD, Olson KM, Singh P, Grunewald CM, Niegisch G, Lee JL, Gallina A, Bandini M, Necchi A, Mossanen M, McGregor BA, Curran C, Grivas P, Sonpavde GP. Optimal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from a global, multicentre collaboration. BJU Int 2021; 128:607-614. [PMID: 33909949 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate outcomes of patients achieving a post-treatment pathological stage of <ypT2N0 at radical cystectomy (RC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to identify an optimal definition of pathological response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from 10 international centres who underwent NAC for cT2-4aN0-1 MIBC and achieved <ypT2N0 disease at RC were included. The primary outcome was time to recurrence, either local or distant. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological variables and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 625 patients were included. The median age was 66 years and 80% were male. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC, 56%) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC)/dose-dense (dd)MVAC (32%) were the most common NAC regimens. ypT0, pure ypTis, ypTa ±ypTis and ypT1 ± ypTis were attained in 58.1%, 20.0%, 7.6% and 14.2% of patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of recurrence at 5 years was 9%, 16%, 29% and 30%, respectively. Pathological stage was prognostic for recurrence, with ypTa ± Tis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-7.30) and ypT1 ± Tis disease (HR 4.03, 95% CI 2.13-7.63) associated with a significantly higher recurrence risk. Pure ypTis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82-3.38) and the type of NAC regimen (ddMVAC: HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.55-4.56; MVAC: HR 1.18, 9%% CI 0.25-5.54; reference: GC) were not associated with recurrence. CONCLUSION We propose that optimal pathological response after NAC be defined as attainment of ypT0N0/ypTisN0 at RC. Patients with ypTaN0 or ypT1N0 disease (with or without Tis) at RC displayed a significantly higher risk of recurrence and may be candidates for trials investigating adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leonidas N Diamantopoulos
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Ajjai Alva
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Sumati Gupta
- University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jonathan D Tward
- University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Camilla M Grunewald
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wells JC, Dudani S, Gan CL, Stukalin I, Azad AA, Liow E, Donskov F, Yuasa T, Pal SK, De Velasco G, Hansen AR, Beuselinck B, Kollmannsberger CK, Powles T, McGregor BA, Duh MS, Huynh L, Heng DYC. Clinical Effectiveness of Second-line Sunitinib Following Immuno-oncology Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-world Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:354-361. [PMID: 33863648 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist on the clinical effectiveness of second-line (2L) vascular endothelial growth factor (receptor) targeted inhibitor (VEGF(R)i) sunitinib after first-line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in real-world settings. METHODS A retrospective cohort study among adult patients with mRCC treated with 2L sunitinib following 1L IO was conducted from select International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) centers. All analyses were performed overall and by 1L ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI+NIVO) or 1L IO+VEGF(R)i. Median overall survival (mOS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) in 2L were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The 2L objective response rate (ORR) (complete/partial response) was reported. RESULTS Among 102 patients on 2L sunitinib, mean age was 61.3 years. IMDC risk scores at 2L initiation was available for 83 patients: 8 (9.6%) were favorable, 45 (54.2%) were intermediate, and 30 (36.1%) were poor risk. The 1L consisted of IPI+NIVO in 62 (60.8%), IO+VEGF(R)i therapy in 27 (26.5%), and IO monotherapy in 13 (12.7%) patients. Among all patients, mOS was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-21.7), with a 1-year OS rate of 57.5% (95% CI, 45.2-68.0). mTTD was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.2) and ORR was 22.5%. CONCLUSION Despite availability of effective 1L therapies in recent years, 2L sunitinib continues to have clinical activity after failure of 1L IO. Further studies on optimal treatment sequencing after 1L IO progression are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Connor Wells
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Chun Loo Gan
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Igor Stukalin
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Arun A Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Liow
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Division of Systems Biology and Personalized Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Frede Donskov
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Department of Urology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Guillermo De Velasco
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Department of Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Benoit Beuselinck
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mei S Duh
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abou Alaiwi S, Nassar AH, Adib E, Groha SM, Akl EW, McGregor BA, Esplin ED, Yang S, Hatchell K, Fusaro V, Nielsen S, Kwiatkowski DJ, Sonpavde GP, Pomerantz M, Garber JE, Freedman ML, Rana HQ, Gusev A, Choueiri TK. Trans-ethnic variation in germline variants of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep 2021; 34:108926. [PMID: 33789101 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior studies of the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) germline landscape investigated predominantly patients of European ancestry. We examine the frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 1,829 patients with RCC from various ancestries. Overall, P/LP variants are found in 17% of patients, among whom 10.3% harbor one or more clinically actionable variants with potential preventive or therapeutic utility. Patients of African ancestry with RCC harbor significantly more P/LP variants in FH compared to patients of non-African ancestry with RCC and African controls from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Patients of non-African ancestry have significantly more P/LP variants in CHEK2 compared to patients of African ancestry with RCC and non-Finnish Europeans controls. Non-Africans with RCC have more actionable variants compared to Africans with RCC. This work helps understand the underlying biological differences in RCC between Africans and non-Africans and paves the way to more comprehensive genomic characterization of underrepresented populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elio Adib
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan M Groha
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elie W Akl
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Shan Yang
- Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - David J Kwiatkowski
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Huma Q Rana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bakouny Z, Braun DA, Shukla SA, Pan W, Gao X, Hou Y, Flaifel A, Tang S, Bosma-Moody A, He MX, Vokes N, Nyman J, Xie W, Nassar AH, Abou Alaiwi S, Flippot R, Bouchard G, Steinharter JA, Nuzzo PV, Ficial M, Sant'Angelo M, Forman J, Berchuck JE, Dudani S, Bi K, Park J, Camp S, Sticco-Ivins M, Hirsch L, Baca SC, Wind-Rotolo M, Ross-Macdonald P, Sun M, Lee GSM, Chang SL, Wei XX, McGregor BA, Harshman LC, Genovese G, Ellis L, Pomerantz M, Hirsch MS, Freedman ML, Atkins MB, Wu CJ, Ho TH, Linehan WM, McDermott DF, Heng DYC, Viswanathan SR, Signoretti S, Van Allen EM, Choueiri TK. Integrative molecular characterization of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun 2021; 12:808. [PMID: 33547292 PMCID: PMC7865061 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid (S/R) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are highly aggressive tumors with limited molecular and clinical characterization. Emerging evidence suggests immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are particularly effective for these tumors, although the biological basis for this property is largely unknown. Here, we evaluate multiple clinical trial and real-world cohorts of S/R RCC to characterize their molecular features, clinical outcomes, and immunologic characteristics. We find that S/R RCC tumors harbor distinctive molecular features that may account for their aggressive behavior, including BAP1 mutations, CDKN2A deletions, and increased expression of MYC transcriptional programs. We show that these tumors are highly responsive to ICI and that they exhibit an immune-inflamed phenotype characterized by immune activation, increased cytotoxic immune infiltration, upregulation of antigen presentation machinery genes, and PD-L1 expression. Our findings build on prior work and shed light on the molecular drivers of aggressivity and responsiveness to ICI of S/R RCC. Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid tumours are highly aggressive forms of renal cell carcinoma that are also responsive to immunotherapy. In this study, the authors perform a comprehensive molecular characterization of these tumours discovering an enrichment of specific alterations and an inflamed phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Braun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sachet A Shukla
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wenting Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yue Hou
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abdallah Flaifel
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Tang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alice Bosma-Moody
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meng Xiao He
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalie Vokes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jackson Nyman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bouchard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John A Steinharter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pier Vitale Nuzzo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Miriam Ficial
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Juliet Forman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jacob E Berchuck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kevin Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sabrina Camp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvan C Baca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Maxine Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gwo-Shu Mary Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xiao X Wei
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren C Harshman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giannicola Genovese
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leigh Ellis
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle S Hirsch
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Catherine J Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Thai H Ho
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - W Marston Linehan
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ravi P, Mantia C, Su C, Sorenson K, Elhag D, Rathi N, Bakouny Z, Agarwal N, Zakharia Y, Costello BA, McKay RR, Narayan V, Alva A, McGregor BA, Gao X, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Immunotherapy Rechallenge in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:1606-1610. [PMID: 32469396 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance Several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for use in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge in mRCC is unknown. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI rechallenge in patients with mRCC. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with mRCC from 9 institutions in the US who received at least 2 separate lines of ICI (ICI-1, ICI-2) between January 2012 and December 2019. Exposure Receipt of an ICI (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1), alone or in combination with other therapies, in at least 2 separate lines of therapy for mRCC. Main Outcomes and Measures Investigator-assessed best overall response and immune-related adverse events. Results A total of 69 patients were included. Median (range) age at diagnosis of mRCC was 61 (36-86) years. Of these, 50 were men and 19 were women. The most common therapies received at ICI-1 were single-agent ICI (n = 27 [39%]) or ICI in combination with targeted therapy (n = 29 [42%]), while at ICI-2, the most common therapies were single-agent ICI (n = 26 [38%]) or dual ICI (n = 22 [32%]). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 owing to disease progression (n = 50 [72%]) or toxic effects (n = 16 [23%]). The overall response rates at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 37% and 23%, respectively. The likelihood of a response at ICI-2 was greatest among patients who had previously responded to ICI-1 (7 of 24 [29%]), although responses at ICI-2 were seen in those who had progressive disease as their best response following ICI-1 (3 of 14 [21%]) as well as in those who received single-agent ICI at ICI-2 (7 of 23 [30%]). Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events were seen in 18 patients (26%) and 11 patients (16%) at ICI-1 and ICI-2, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this multicenter cohort study suggest that ICI rechallenge in patients with mRCC may be safe and reasonably efficacious, with an overall response rate of 23%. Data from prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and determine the role of sequential ICI regimens in treatment of mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ziad Bakouny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xin Gao
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Background: Treatments for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) are evolving with multiple targeted and immune therapy drugs currently approved by regulatory agencies as single agents or in combination. Developing predictive biomarkers to determine which patients derive a differential benefit from a particular treatment is an area of ongoing clinical research. Objective: We sought to systematically evaluate the role of tumour tissue-based biomarkers that assist in selection of therapy for mccRCC. Methods: Literature addressing the role of biomarkers in mccRCC was identified through a search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science and a hand search of major conference abstracts (from Jan 2010 –Sep 2020). Abstracts were screened to identify papers meriting full-text review. Studies with a comparison arm were included to assess biomarker relevance. A narrative review of studies was performed. Results: The literature search yielded 6784 potentially relevant articles. 133 articles met criteria for full text review, and 10 articles were identified by scanning bibliographies of relevant studies. A total of 33 articles (involving 13 studies) were selected for data extraction and subsequent review. Conclusions: Predictive biomarkers for immediate use in the clinic are lacking, and embedding their evaluation and validation in future clinical trials is needed to refine practice and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L. Schmidt
- Lark Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul A. Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A. McGregor
- Lark Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McKay RR, McGregor BA, Xie W, Braun DA, Wei X, Kyriakopoulos CE, Zakharia Y, Maughan BL, Rose TL, Stadler WM, McDermott DF, Harshman LC, Choueiri TK. Optimized Management of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Response-Based Phase II Study (OMNIVORE). J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:4240-4248. [PMID: 33108238 PMCID: PMC7768333 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this phase II response-adaptive trial, we investigated the rational application of immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma (RCC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03203473). METHODS We enrolled patients with metastatic RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. All patients received nivolumab alone with subsequent arm allocation based on response. Patients with a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) within 6 months discontinued nivolumab and were observed (arm A). Patients with stable disease or progressive disease (PD) after no more than 6 months of nivolumab received two doses of ipilimumab (arm B). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with PR/CR at 1 year after nivolumab discontinuation (arm A) and proportion of nivolumab nonresponders who converted to PR/CR after ipilimumab (arm B). RESULTS Overall, 83 patients initiated treatment, of whom 96% had clear-cell histology, 51% were treatment naïve, and 67% had intermediate/poor-risk disease. Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Within 6 months, induction nivolumab resulted in a confirmed PR in 12% of patients (n = 10). Fourteen patients were not allocated to a study arm (seven because of toxicity, seven because of PD). Twelve patients (14%) were allocated to arm A and discontinued nivolumab, of whom five (42%; 90% CI, 18% to 68%) remained off nivolumab at ≥ 1 year. Of 57 patients (69%) allocated to arm B, two patients converted to a confirmed PR (4%; 90% CI, 1% to 11%), and no CRs were observed. CONCLUSION In this study, nivolumab followed by two doses of ipilimumab resulted in no CRs and a low PR/CR conversion. The number of patients evaluated for nivolumab discontinuation was too small to assess the value of this approach. Currently, our data do not support a response-adaptive strategy for checkpoint blockade in advanced RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xiao Wei
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Yousef Zakharia
- University of Iowa Health Care, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Tracy L. Rose
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gong J, Payne D, Caron J, Bay CP, McGregor BA, Hainer J, Partridge AH, Neilan TG, Di Carli M, Nohria A, Groarke JD. Reduced Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Increased Cardiovascular Mortality After Prolonged Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. JACC CardioOncol 2020; 2:553-563. [PMID: 34396266 PMCID: PMC8352085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Prolonged androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is favored over short-term use in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer (PC). Objectives This study sought to compare cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality among patients with PC with and without ADT exposure and to explore how duration of ADT exposure influences CRF and CV mortality. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients referred for exercise treadmill testing (ETT) after a PC diagnosis. PC risk classification was based on Gleason score (GS): high risk if GS ≥8; intermediate risk if GS = 7; and low risk if GS <7. CRF was categorized by metabolic equivalents (METs): METs >8 defined as good CRF and METs ≤8 as reduced CRF. ADT exposure was categorized as short term (≤6 months) versus prolonged (>6 months). Results A total of 616 patients underwent an ETT a median of 4.8 years (interquartile range: 2.0, 7.9 years) after PC diagnosis. Of those, 150 patients (24.3%) received ADT prior to the ETT; 99 with short-term and 51 with prolonged exposure. 504 patients (81.8%) had ≥2 CV risk factors. Prolonged ADT was associated with reduced CRF (odds ratio [OR]: 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 5.61; p = 0.007) and increased CV mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.16 to 12.96; p = 0.028) in adjusted analyses. Although the association between short-term ADT exposure and reduced CRF was of borderline significance (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.00 to 2.94; p = 0.052), there was no association with CV mortality (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 0.51 to 5.01; p = 0.420) in adjusted Cox regression models. Conclusions Among patients with PC and high baseline CV risk, prolonged ADT exposure was associated with reduced CRF and increased CV mortality.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADT, androgen deprivation therapy
- BMI, body mass index
- CI, confidence interval
- CRF, cardiorespiratory fitness
- CV, cardiovascular
- ETT, exercise treadmill test
- HR, hazard ratio
- IQR, interquartile range
- MET, metabolic equivalent
- OR, odds ratio
- PC, prostate cancer
- androgen deprivation therapy
- cardio-oncology
- cardiorespiratory fitness
- cardiovascular mortality
- cardiovascular risk
- prostate cancer
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Gong
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Payne
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jesse Caron
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Camden P Bay
- Center for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jon Hainer
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Adult Survivorship Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tomas G Neilan
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcelo Di Carli
- Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anju Nohria
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Adult Survivorship Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John D Groarke
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Adult Survivorship Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McGregor BA, Wei XX. CDK12 Loss in Prostate Cancer Imparts Poor Prognosis and Limited Susceptibility to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. JCO Precis Oncol 2020; 4:367-369. [DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
32
|
Grivas P, Lalani AKA, Pond GR, Nagy RJ, Faltas B, Agarwal N, Gupta SV, Drakaki A, Vaishampayan UN, Wang J, Barata PC, Gopalakrishnan D, Naik G, McGregor BA, Kiedrowski LA, Lanman RB, Sonpavde GP. Circulating Tumor DNA Alterations in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma and Association with Clinical Outcomes: A Pilot Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:695-699. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
33
|
Abstract
Cancer patients frequently develop tumor and treatment-related complications, leading to diminished quality of life, shortened survival, and overutilization of emergency department and hospital services. Outpatient oncology treatment has potential to leave cancer patients unmonitored for long periods while at risk of clinical deterioration which has been exaggerated during the COVID19 pandemic. Visits to cancer clinics and hospitals risk exposing immunocompromised patients to infectious complications. Remote patient reported outcomes monitoring systems have been developed for use in cancer treatment, showing benefits in economic and survival outcomes. While advanced devices such as pulmonary artery pressure monitors and implantable loop recorders have proven benefits in cardiovascular care, similar options do not exist for oncology. Here we review the current literature around remote patient monitoring in cancer care and propose the use of reliable devices for capturing and reporting patient symptoms and physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregory A Vidal
- Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA
| | - Sumit A Shah
- Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The therapeutic landscape for urothelial carcinoma has changed significantly over the past few years with the addition of immunotherapy to platinum-based chemotherapy. Targeted therapy against FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) is now also approved for the minority of patients with FGFR aberrations. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are of great interest in urothelial carcinoma, with a recent FDA approval for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and others in development. AREAS COVERED This review will provide an overview of treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma and detail the various ADCs being studied in this disease. EXPERT OPINION ADCs are an important therapeutic option for urothelial carcinoma. Responses to EV exceeded 40% in heavily pre-treated patients, while the response rate to EV combined with pembrolizumab in a phase 1b trial was ~70% in treatment-naïve patients. EV has already been approved in the United States and we await randomized data to confirm a survival benefit with EV. Meanwhile, studies of other ADCs, including in biomarker-selected populations, are ongoing. ADCs will undoubtedly play an increasing role in the management of urothelial carcinoma and will likely be offered earlier in the disease course, resulting in significant changes to treatment algorithms in urothelial cancer in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praful Ravi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lalani AKA, Xie W, Braun DA, Kaymakcalan M, Bossé D, Steinharter JA, Martini DJ, Simantov R, Lin X, Wei XX, McGregor BA, McKay RR, Harshman LC, Choueiri TK. Effect of Antibiotic Use on Outcomes with Systemic Therapies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:372-381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
36
|
Abou Alaiwi S, Xie W, Nassar AH, Dudani S, Martini D, Bakouny Z, Steinharter JA, Nuzzo PV, Flippot R, Martinez-Chanza N, Wei X, McGregor BA, Kaymakcalan MD, Heng DYC, Bilen MA, Choueiri TK, Harshman LC. Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors after clinically significant immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e000144. [PMID: 32066646 PMCID: PMC7057439 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce a range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with various degrees of severity. While clinical experience with ICI retreatment following clinically significant irAEs is growing, the safety and efficacy are not yet well characterized. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study identified patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with ICI who had >1 week therapy interruption for irAEs. Patients were classified into retreatment and discontinuation cohorts based on whether or not they resumed an ICI. Toxicity and clinical outcomes were assessed descriptively. RESULTS Of 499 patients treated with ICIs, 80 developed irAEs warranting treatment interruption; 36 (45%) of whom were restarted on an ICI and 44 (55%) who permanently discontinued. Median time to initial irAE was similar between the retreatment and discontinuation cohorts (2.8 vs 2.7 months, p=0.59). The type and grade of irAEs were balanced across the cohorts; however, fewer retreatment patients required corticosteroids (55.6% vs 84.1%, p=0.007) and hospitalizations (33.3% vs 65.9%, p=0.007) for irAE management compared with discontinuation patients. Median treatment holiday before reinitiation was 0.9 months (0.2-31.6). After retreatment, 50% (n=18/36) experienced subsequent irAEs (12 new, 6 recurrent) with 7 (19%) grade 3 events and 13 drug interruptions. Median time to irAE recurrence after retreatment was 2.8 months (range: 0.3-13.8). Retreatment resulted in 6 (23.1%) additional responses in 26 patients whose disease had not previously responded. From first ICI initiation, median time to next therapy was 14.2 months (95% CI 8.2 to 18.9) and 9.0 months (5.3 to 25.8), and 2-year overall survival was 76% (95%CI 55% to 88%) and 66% (48% to 79%) in the retreatment and discontinuation groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Despite a considerable rate of irAE recurrence with retreatment after a prior clinically significant irAE, most irAEs were low grade and controllable. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm that retreatment enhances survival outcomes that justify the safety risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dylan Martini
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John A Steinharter
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pier Vitale Nuzzo
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), University of Genoa School of Medicine and Surgery, Genova, Italy
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
| | - Nieves Martinez-Chanza
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Xiao Wei
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren C Harshman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Savard MF, Wells JC, Graham J, Dudani S, Steinharter JA, McGregor BA, Donskov F, Bjarnason GA, Vaishampayan UN, Hansen AR, Iafolla MAJ, Zanotti G, Huynh L, Chang R, Duh MS, Heng DYC. Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among First-Line Sunitinib Patients with Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium Risk Group. Oncologist 2020; 25:422-430. [PMID: 31971318 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups are important when considering therapeutic options for first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients with clear cell mRCC initiating first-line sunitinib between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective database study. Median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were stratified by IMDC risk groups and evaluated for those in the combined intermediate and poor risk group and separately for those in the intermediate risk group with one versus two risk factors. RESULTS Among 1,769 patients treated with first-line sunitinib, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate, and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the three risk groups, patients had similar age, gender, and sunitinib initiation year. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 7.1 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 23.2 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS (35.1 vs. 21.9 months) and TTD (10.3 vs. 6.6 months) were significantly different between intermediate risk patients with one versus two risk factors. CONCLUSION This real-world study found a median OS of 52 months for patients with favorable IMDC risk treated with first-line sunitinib, setting a new benchmark on clinical outcomes of clear cell mRCC. Analysis of intermediate risk group by one or two risk factors demonstrated distinct clinical outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This analysis offers a contemporary benchmark for overall survival (median, 52.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 43.4-61.2) among patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as first-line therapy in a real-world setting and classified as favorable risk according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group classification. This study demonstrates that clinical outcomes differ between IMDC risk groups as well as within the intermediate risk group based on the number of risk factors, thus warranting further consideration of risk group when counseling patients about therapeutic options and designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeffrey Graham
- CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lynn Huynh
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rose Chang
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mei S Duh
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dibble EH, Kravets S, Cheng S, Sakellis C, Gray KP, Abbott A, Bossé D, Pomerantz MM, McGregor BA, Harshman LC, Michaelson MD, McKay RR, Choueiri TK, Krajewski KM, Jacene HA. Utility of FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma with Osseous Metastases: Comparison with CT and 99mTc-MDP Bone Scan in a Prospective Clinical Trial. KCA 2019. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-190075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth H. Dibble
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sasha Kravets
- Department of Data Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - SuChun Cheng
- Department of Data Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sakellis
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn P. Gray
- Department of Data Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda Abbott
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dominick Bossé
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark M. Pomerantz
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A. McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren C. Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M. Dror Michaelson
- Genitourinary Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine M. Krajewski
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather A. Jacene
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McGregor BA, McKay RR, Braun DA, Werner L, Gray K, Flaifel A, Signoretti S, Hirsch MS, Steinharter JA, Bakouny Z, Flippot R, Wei XX, Choudhury A, Kilbridge K, Freeman GJ, Van Allen EM, Harshman LC, McDermott DF, Vaishampayan U, Choueiri TK. Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Variant Histology and/or Sarcomatoid Features. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:63-70. [PMID: 31721643 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this multicenter phase II trial, we evaluated atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with variant histology or any RCC histology with ≥ 20% sarcomatoid differentiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients may have received previous systemic therapy, excluding prior bevacizumab or checkpoint inhibitors. Patients underwent a baseline biopsy and received atezolizumab 1,200 mg and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1. Additional end points were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, biomarkers of response as determined by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and on-therapy quality-of-life (QOL) metrics using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-19 and the Brief Fatigue Inventory. RESULTS Sixty patients received at least 1 dose of either study agent; the majority (65%) were treatment naïve. The ORR for the overall population was 33% and 50% in patients with clear cell RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and 26% in patients with variant histology RCC. Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.9 months). PD-L1 status was available for 36 patients; 15 (42%) had ≥ 1% expression on tumor cells. ORR in PD-L1-positive patients was 60% (n = 9) v 19% (n = 4) in PD-L1-negative patients. Eight patients (13%) developed treatment-related grade 3 toxicities. There were no treatment-related grade 4-5 toxicities. QOL was maintained throughout therapy. CONCLUSION In this study, atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated safety and resulted in objective responses in patients with variant histology RCC or RCC with ≥ 20% sarcomatoid differentiation. This regimen warrants additional exploration in patients with rare RCC, particularly those with PD-L1-positive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiao X Wei
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
McGregor BA, Sonpavde G. Enfortumab Vedotin, a fully human monoclonal antibody against Nectin 4 conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E for metastatic urothelial Carcinoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019; 28:821-826. [PMID: 31526130 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1667332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The conventional management of most patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) is platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy. Erdafitinib is an option in post-platinum patients with activating mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-3 and -2. Salvage therapy with taxanes or vinflunine has demonstrated minimal efficacy. Enfortumab Vedotin (EV), a monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting nectin-4 is under investigation in patients with advanced UC. Areas covered: This review describes the epidemiology and unmet needs of patients with metastatic UC and is focused specifically on heavily treated patients. We explore the rationale for targeting nectin 4 and the clinical development of EV; efficacy and safety data from the completed phase I and II studies are examined. Ongoing trials to definitively assess clinical outcomes in comparison to current therapy and trials exploring EV in combination are also highlighted. Expert opinion: There is an unmet need for new therapies in most patients with advanced UC and who progress after platinum and immunotherapy. EV has shown promising efficacy and safety in this population in phase 1 and 2 trials including those with poor prognostic factors such as liver metastases. Ongoing trials exploring this agent in combination will continue to advance the treatment of UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute , Boston , MA , USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute , Boston , MA , USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vastola ME, Yang DD, Muralidhar V, Mahal BA, Lathan CS, McGregor BA, Nguyen PL. Laboratory Eligibility Criteria as Potential Barriers to Participation by Black Men in Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:413-414. [PMID: 29423505 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E Vastola
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David D Yang
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Christopher S Lathan
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rosenberg JE, O'Donnell PH, Balar AV, McGregor BA, Heath EI, Yu EY, Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Gartner EM, Pinelli JM, Liang SY, Melhem-Bertrandt A, Petrylak DP. Pivotal Trial of Enfortumab Vedotin in Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum and Anti-Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2592-2600. [PMID: 31356140 PMCID: PMC6784850 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 358] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is an incurable disease with limited treatment options, especially for patients who were previously treated with platinum and anti–programmed death 1 or anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody–drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma. METHODS EV-201 is a global, phase II, single-arm study of enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg (intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with platinum chemotherapy and anti–PD-1/L1 therapy. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points were duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Enfortumab vedotin was administered to 125 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Median follow-up was 10.2 months (range, 0.5 to 16.5 months). Confirmed objective response rate was 44% (95% CI, 35.1% to 53.2%), including 12% complete responses. Similar responses were observed in prespecified subgroups, such as those patients with liver metastases and those with no response to prior anti–PD-1/L1 therapy. Median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 0.95 to 11.30+ months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (50%), any peripheral neuropathy (50%), alopecia (49%), any rash (48%), decreased appetite (44%), and dysgeusia (40%). No single treatment-related adverse events grade 3 or greater occurred in 10% or more of patients. CONCLUSION Enfortumab vedotin demonstrated a clinically meaningful response rate with a manageable and tolerable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with platinum and anti–PD-1/L1 therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Evan Y Yu
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.,University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Noah M Hahn
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Psutka SP, Chang SL, Cahn D, Uzzo RG, McGregor BA. Reassessing the Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2019. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:276-283. [PMID: 31099657 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) has long been considered a standard of care in the management of mRCC. This is largely based on randomized trials in the era of interferon (IFN) that demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS). With the advent of targeted therapies, the role of CRN has been questioned and multiple retrospective analyses have shown a potential benefit, particularly in intermediate-risk disease. Two long-awaited prospective trials have been published in the past year that explore the role of CRN. The CARMENA trial randomly assigned patients to therapy with sunitinib with or without CRN, showing noninferiority of sunitinib alone versus sunitinib plus CRN with a median OS of 18.4 months versus 13.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for mortality, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.1). The SURTIME trial randomly assigned patients to immediate CRN followed by sunitinib versus a deferred CRN after three cycles of sunitinib. Analysis is limited by early termination as a result of low accrual. Although there was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), median OS was significantly improved among patients in the deferred CRN arm (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; p = .032). Early systemic therapy is paramount, but there are patients who may derive benefit by incorporating the removal of the primary tumor in their multimodal therapy, perhaps in a deferred setting. As systemic treatment paradigms shift and immunotherapy again moves to the frontline setting with the potential for novel therapeutic approaches, the role of CRN will continue to evolve with the potential to offer surgical interventions with minimal, if any, delay in systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah P Psutka
- 1 Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Steven L Chang
- 2 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - David Cahn
- 4 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Bradley A McGregor
- 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- 5 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lalani AKA, McGregor BA, Albiges L, Choueiri TK, Motzer R, Powles T, Wood C, Bex A. Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2018: Current Paradigms, Use of Immunotherapy, and Future Directions. Eur Urol 2018; 75:100-110. [PMID: 30327274 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has greatly evolved over the last 15yr. More recently, combination strategies involving contemporary immunotherapy have emerged as key opportunities to further shift the treatment landscape. OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of standard therapeutic options in mccRCC as well as combination immunotherapy options on the horizon. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to February 2018 and according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A narrative review of studies was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-six studies were included regarding therapies for metastatic RCC including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapy (n=9), mTOR inhibitors (n=2), cytokines (n=3), vaccines (n=3), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs, n=9). VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy had been the standard therapy, and its use is evolving in the front-line setting with ICIs; cabozantinib provides superior progression-free survival versus sunitinib in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria. The mTOR therapy is largely inferior to VEGF-directed therapy, although it has a role in combination strategies. Cytokines have largely been replaced in current practice throughout most regions, and vaccines have failed to show improved survival in phase III studies to date. ICIs have now become standard care in untreated patients with intermediate and poor risks, given overall survival benefit seen with CheckMate-214 study; survival data from IMmotion 151 are not yet mature. Several ongoing phase III combination trials, with promising early-phase data, are due to be read out. CONCLUSIONS The treatment landscape for mccRCC has evolved since the introduction of VEGF inhibitors. Combination therapies involving checkpoint inhibitors could be the next standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY With the expanding role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the treatment paradigm has shifted to include combination therapy in the untreated setting. As the field advances, the bar has been raised in evaluating ongoing combination strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Institut Gustave-Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Motzer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust and Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Wood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Axel Bex
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Judson GJ, McGregor BA, Ellis KJ, Howse AM. Evaluation of controlled-release devices for providing chromium sesquioxide and zinc in Huacaya alpacas at pasture. Aust Vet J 2018; 96:458-463. [DOI: 10.1111/avj.12759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- GJ Judson
- South Australian Research & Development Institute; Glenside SA Australia
| | - BA McGregor
- Fibre Quality Department, Victorian Institute of Animal Science; Department of Agriculture, Energy & Minerals; Attwood VIC Australia
| | - KJ Ellis
- CSIRO, Agriculture & Food; Armidale NSW Australia
| | - AM Howse
- Fibre Quality Department, Victorian Institute of Animal Science; Department of Agriculture, Energy & Minerals; Attwood VIC Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nassar AH, Lundgren K, Pomerantz M, Van Allen E, Harshman L, Choudhury AD, Preston MA, Steele GS, Mouw KW, Wei XX, McGregor BA, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J, Kwiatkowski DJ, Sonpavde GP. Enrichment of FGFR3-TACC3 Fusions in Patients With Bladder Cancer Who Are Young, Asian, or Have Never Smoked. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:1800013. [PMID: 33604498 DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose FGFR3-TACC3 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 3-transforming acidic coiled coil-containing protein 3) fusions have recently been identified as driver mutations that lead to the activation of FGFR3 in bladder cancer and other tumor types and are associated with sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We examined the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions and hypothesized that they are enriched in a subset of patients with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods We correlated somatic FGFR3-TACC3 fusions with clinical and molecular features in two cohorts of patients with bladder cancer. The first cohort consisted of the muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) data set (n = 412) from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The second cohort consisted of patients with MIBC or high-grade non-MIBC at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute that had targeted capture sequencing of a selected panel of cancer genes (n = 356). All statistical tests were two sided. The clinical response of one patient with FGFR3-TACC3 bladder cancer to an FGFR3 inhibitor was investigated. Results Overall, 751 patients with high-grade bladder cancer without FGFR3-TACC3 fusions and 17 with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions were identified in the pooled analysis of the data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. FGFR3-TACC3 fusions were enriched in patients age ≤ 50 years versus age 51 to 65 years versus those older than 65 years (pooled, P = .002), and were observed in four (12%) of 33 patients age ≤ 50 years in the pooled analysis. Similarly, FGFR3-TACC3 fusions were significantly more common in Asians (13%) compared with African Americans (4%) and whites (2%; pooled, P < .001), as well as in never smokers (5.6%) compared with ever smokers (1.1%; pooled, P < .001). One patient with the fusion who was treated with an FGFR3 inhibitor achieved complete remission for 10 months. Conclusion Clinical testing to identify FGFR3 fusions should be prioritized for patients with bladder cancer who are younger, never smokers, and/or Asian.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin H Nassar
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin Lundgren
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Eliezer Van Allen
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren Harshman
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Atish D Choudhury
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Preston
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Graeme S Steele
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kent W Mouw
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Xiao X Wei
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - David J Kwiatkowski
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- , , , and , Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and , , , , , , , , , , and , Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lalani AKA, Xie W, Lin X, Steinharter JA, Martini DJ, Duquette A, Bosse D, McKay RR, Simantov R, Wei XX, McGregor BA, Harshman LC, Choueiri TK. Antibiotic use and outcomes with systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
607 Background: Antibiotic (Abx) use is shown to alter commensal gut microbiota, a key regulator of immune homeostasis. We conducted the largest investigation to date on the impact of Abx use on outcomes in mRCC patients treated with systemic agents. Methods: Two cohorts were analyzed: an institutional cohort (DFCI, n = 146) of patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and an external cohort from pooled phase II/III clinical trials (Pfizer, n = 4144) of patients treated with interferon (IFN, n = 510), mTOR inhibitors (n = 660), and VEGF inhibitors (n = 2974). Abx use was defined as Abx treatment at any time between 8-weeks pre- and 4-weeks post the start of systemic therapy. We examined the associations of Abx use and objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Cox/logistic regression models, adjusted for prognostic factors including risk groups. Results: In the DFCI cohort, 15% had non-clear cell histology, 43% had first-line ICI, 45% had combotherapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between Abx users (n = 31, 21%) and non-users (p > 0.15). Abx users had a lower ORR (12.9 vs 34.8%, p = 0.026) and shorter PFS compared to non-users (Table). In the external cohort, Abx users (n = 709) had lower ORR (19.3 vs 24.2%, p = 0.005). IFN treated patients (current or prior cytokines) had worse OS if they received Abx compared to those who did not. However, there was no OS difference by Abx use in mTOR or VEGF treated patients without prior cytokines. Conclusions: Abx use was independently associated with worse outcomes in mRCC patients receiving contemporary ICI or historic cytokine immunotherapy. We hypothesize that concurrent use of Abx may reduce the efficacy of ICI due to a complex interplay with the host microbiome. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Xun Lin
- Pfizer Oncology Inc., San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nassar A, Lundgren K, Pomerantz M, Van Allen EM, Choudhury AD, Harshman LC, Preston MA, Mouw KW, Wei XX, McGregor BA, Choueiri TK, Bellmunt J, Kwiatkowski DJ, Sonpavde G. FGFR3-TACC3 fusion in bladder cancer: Enrichment in the young, never-smokers, and Asians. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
465 Background: Bladder cancer patients (pts) are typically elderly with median age ~70 years. We hypothesized that younger pts (≤age 50) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have distinct molecular features, including potential driver mutations that could serve as therapeutic targets. Methods: We used the MIBC TCGA cohort (n = 412, Cell 2017) analyzed by whole exome sequencing as a discovery cohort, and then confirmed observations using 356 pts with MIBC and high grade (HG) non-MIBC analyzed at Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) by the Oncopanel assay. Oncopanel assesses 447 somatic cancer genes and 191 regions across 60 genes for rearrangement detection by massively parallel sequencing. We examined associations between age (≤50, 51-65, and > 65) and molecular features, using the χ2 test for discrete data, and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for quantitative data. Nominal p values were obtained, and the FDR correction was employed to obtain q values. Results: The following DNA alterations were significantly enriched in the TCGA in ≤50 vs 51-65 vs > 65 age groups respectively: focal deletion in CREBBP (3/25 [12%] vs 2/137 [1.5%] vs 1/250 [0.4%], p < 0.0001, q = 0.0126); microRNA Cluster III (13/25 [52%] vs 53/137 [38.7%] vs 55/250 [22%], p = 0.0005, q = 0.0252); fusion in FGFR3-TACC3 (3/25 [12%] vs 2/137 [1.5%] vs 5/250 [2%], p = 0.0055, q = 0.1386). Given that FGFR3-TACC3 fusions are potential therapeutic targets, we examined the association between FGFR3-TACC3 fusions and clinical features in a pooled analysis combining the TCGA and DFCI cohorts totaling 768 pts. FGFR3-TACC3 fusions were enriched in: ≤50 age group vs 51-65 vs > 65 (4/33 [12.1%] vs 7/232 [3%] vs 6/503 [1.2%] respectively, p = 0.0001). Fusions were also significantly more common in Asians vs. Blacks vs. Whites (6/47 [12.8%] vs 1/28 [3.6%] vs 10/666 [1.5%] respectively, p < 0.0001) and in never-smokers vs. ever smokers (12/194 [6.2%] vs 5/545 [0.9%] respectively, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: FGFR3-TACC3 fusion, a known potentially actionable genomic alteration in MIBC, is significantly enriched in young pts, never-smokers and those of Asian ethnicity. Clinical testing to detect FGFR3-TACC3 fusion should be prioritized for MIBC and HG-non-MIBC pts meeting these criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Pomerantz
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Harvard Medical School/ Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lalani AKA, Xie W, Martini DJ, Steinharter JA, Norton CK, Krajewski KM, Duquette A, Bossé D, Bellmunt J, Van Allen EM, McGregor BA, Creighton CJ, Harshman LC, Choueiri TK. Change in Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in response to immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:5. [PMID: 29353553 PMCID: PMC5776777 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0315-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background An elevated Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with worse outcomes in several malignancies. However, its role with contemporary immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is unknown. We investigated the utility of NLR in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICB. Methods We examined NLR at baseline and 6 (±2) weeks later in 142 patients treated between 2009 and 2017 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, USA). Landmark analysis at 6 weeks was conducted to explore the prognostic value of relative NLR change on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Cox and logistic regression models allowed for adjustment of line of therapy, number of IMDC risk factors, histology and baseline NLR. Results Median follow up was 16.6 months (range: 0.7–67.8). Median duration on therapy was 5.1 months (<1–61.4). IMDC risk groups were: 18% favorable, 60% intermediate, 23% poor-risk. Forty-four percent were on first-line ICB and 56% on 2nd line or more. Median NLR was 3.9 (1.3–42.4) at baseline and 4.1 (1.1–96.4) at week 6. Patients with a higher baseline NLR showed a trend toward lower ORR, shorter PFS, and shorter OS. Higher NLR at 6 weeks was a significantly stronger predictor of all three outcomes than baseline NLR. Relative NLR change by ≥25% from baseline to 6 weeks after ICB therapy was associated with reduced ORR and an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.004), whereas a decrease in NLR by ≥25% was associated with improved outcomes. Conclusions Early decline and NLR at 6 weeks are associated with significantly improved outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICB. The prognostic value of the readily-available NLR warrants larger, prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly-Khan A Lalani
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Dylan J Martini
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - John A Steinharter
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Craig K Norton
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Katherine M Krajewski
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Audrey Duquette
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Dominick Bossé
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Chad J Creighton
- Department of Medicine, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS 305, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lauren C Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Dana 1230, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
CONTEXT Immunotherapy has historic and contemporary presence in prostate, urothelial (UC), and renal cell (RCC) carcinomas. However, robust data on utility and generalizability of these treatments in older patients are lacking. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in elderly patients with prostate cancer, UC, or RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to October 2017 and according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A narrative review of studies was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-one reports were included regarding prostate cancer (four studies), UC (eight), and RCC (nine). In prostate cancer, sipuleucel-T improves survival (median age >70 yr) and similar results were seen in the PROSTVAC phase 2 trial. Ipilimumab has not improved survival independent of age; data for programmed cell death 1 inhibition is evolving. In metastatic UC, ≥50% of patients enrolled in pivotal checkpoint inhibitor studies were aged ≥65 yr. Three studies reported similar objective response rates (ORRs) in patients aged <65 versus ≥65 yr, whereas one study reported comparable ORRs in patients <80 versus ≥80 yr. In metastatic RCC, cytokine studies showed no efficacy difference by age; one study reported more ≥grade 3 toxicity in patients aged ≥65 yr. One vaccine-based study suggests that older age was associated with shorter survival. The benefit of nivolumab in second-line therapy was more apparent for patients aged 65-<75 yr than for those aged ≥75 yr. Across tumor subtypes, immunotherapy was well tolerated with minimal data stratifying toxicity by age. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary immunotherapy has informed practice in genitourinary malignancies independent of patient age. Trial reporting of outcomes by age will be important to understand the generalizability of ongoing investigations for elderly patients. PATIENT SUMMARY With the growing use of immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies, benefits appear to apply independent of age. As the field advances, detailed reporting on outcomes and toxicities by age will be informative for both patients and physicians when discussing treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly-Khan A Lalani
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dominick Bossé
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|