Outcomes for Patients with Node-positive Penile Cancer: Impact of Perioperative Systemic Therapies and the Importance of Surgical Intervention

Regional lymph node mapping in patients with penile cancer undergoing radical inguinal lymph node dissection - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Radical inguinal lymph node dissection (rILND) is the most available treatment to cure penile cancer (PC) with limited inguinal-confined disease. However, guidelines regarding acceptable boundaries of rILND are controversial, and consensus is lacking. The authors aimed to standardize the surgical boundaries of rILND with definite pathological evidence and explore the distribution pattern of inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) in PC.

METHODS

A total of 414 PC patients from two centers who underwent rILND were enrolled. The ILN distribution was divided into seven zones anatomically for pathological examination. Student's t test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

ILNs displayed a funnel-shaped distribution with high density in superior regions. ILNs and metastatic nodes are present anywhere within the radical boundaries. Positive ILNs were mainly concentrated in zone I (51.7%) and zone II (41.3%), but there were 8.7% and 12.3% in inferior zones V and VI, respectively, and 7.1% in the deep ILNs. More importantly, a single positive ILN and first-station positive zone was detected in all seven regions. Single positive ILNs were located in zones I through VI in 40.4%, 23.6%, 6.7%, 18.0%, 4.5%, and 1.1%, respectively, and 5.6% presented deep ILN metastasis directly.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors established a detailed ILN distribution map and displayed lymphatic drainage patterns with definite pathological evidence using a large cohort of PC patients. Single positive ILNs and first-station metastatic zones were observed in any region, even directly with deep ILN metastasis. Only rILND can ensure tumor-free resection without the omission of positive nodes.

[Systemic treatment of penile cancer: New concepts? New achievements?]

Systemic chemotherapy has been in use for metastatic penile carcinoma for years, but its success is limited. Its significance is largely associated with its role in multimodal treatment for lymphatic metastasis in the context of radical lymph node surgery. In cases of limited lymph node involvement, the combination of surgical treatment plus cisplatin- and taxane-based triple combinations may be curative. Advances in the understanding of molecular changes in penile cancer and the search for potential therapy targets have led to numerous studies. Although there is evidence of efficacy of immunotherapeutics, no significant therapeutic improvements have been seen in the clinical routine.

Urological Cancers and Kidney Transplantation: a Literature Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of urological malignancies in renal transplant recipients (RTR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management in these patients remain controversial, adherence to general guidelines is recommended. Kidney transplantation is recognized as the standard of care for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as it offers prolonged survival and better quality of life. In the last decades, survival of RTRs has increased as a result of improved immunosuppressive therapy; nonetheless, the risk of developing cancer is higher among RTRs compared to the general population. Urological malignancies are the second most common after hematological cancer and often have more aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.

Penile cancer

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare cancer with orphan disease designation and a prevalence of 0.1-1 per 100,000 men in high-income countries, but it constitutes up to 10% of malignancies in men in some African, Asian and South American regions. Risk factors for PSCC include the absence of childhood circumcision, phimosis, chronic inflammation, poor penile hygiene, smoking, immunosuppression and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Several different subtypes of HPV-related and non-HPV-related penile cancers have been described, which also have different prognostic profiles. Localized disease can be effectively managed by topical therapy, surgery or radiotherapy. As PSCC is characterized by early lymphatic spread and imaging is inadequate for the detection of micrometastatic disease, correct and upfront surgical staging of the inguinal lymph nodes is crucial in disease management. Advanced stages of disease require multimodal management. Optimal sequencing of treatments and patient selection are still being investigated. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of systemic therapy for advanced PSCC, but they have poor and non-durable responses and high rates of toxic effects, indicating a need for the development of more effective and less toxic therapeutic options. Localized and advanced penile cancers and their treatment have profound physical and psychosexual effects on the quality of life of patients and survivors by altering sexual and urinary function and causing lymphoedema.

Adding radiotherapy based on chemotherapy can improve cancer-specific survival in N3 penile cancer: a SEER-based study

Background

Controversial effectiveness of chemotherapy and still poor prognosis prompt us to find better treatment options. This study targeted at investigating whether adding radiotherapy based on chemotherapy can effectively improve the prognosis of patients, especially for advanced penile cancer.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER*Stat software V.8.3.5; USA; Accession numbers: 13693-Nov2015 and lh8N79l2), and the survival curves were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were performed in order to determine the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for penile cancer-specific survival (PCSS). Subgroup analysis via multivariate Cox models were conducted to discovery the different effect in population with different features.

Results

The median follow-up time was 25 months, the 2-year PCSS was 52.98% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 55.81% in the chemotherapy group. In multivariate analysis of all patients, combined chemoradiotherapy was not associated with PCSS (HR =0.90, 95% CI: 0.63–1.29, P=0.572). In subgroup analysis, chemoradiotherapy improved the PCSS in N3 patients compared to these patients without therapy of radiotherapy (HR =0.54, 95% CI: 0.30–0.98, P=0.043).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated a significant correlation of chemoradiotherapy with improved cancer-specific survival of penile cancer (PeCa) in N3 patients. Prospective international multicenter studies are necessary in order to improve prognosis for patients with advanced penile cancer.

Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most current literature on how the treatment for penile cancer can affect quality of life and to discuss current treatment options to overcome sexual dysfunction and ultimately improve patient wellbeing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist to address the high incidence of sexual dysfunction following penile cancer treatment. Advancements and refinements in the neophalloplasty, penile prosthesis, and penile lengthening procedures have opened the door to improved long-term outcomes. Additionally, studies continue to highlight the severe psychological toll that penile cancer treatment can have on patients. We explore the potential options for addressing the inherent psychologic effects of these treatments and highlight the need for further research in this domain. Although rare, it is important for all urologists to be familiar with the treatments and post-treatment sequelae of penile cancer. Penile cancer is associated with dramatic decline in quality of life and sexual function. Multiple medical and surgical therapies exist that addresses these concerns. Additionally, urologists must also be mindful of the psychologic component regarding surgical disfigurement and the decline in sexual function.

Molecular stratification by BCL2A1 and AIM2 provides additional prognostic value in penile squamous cell carcinoma

Background: Lymph node metastasis is the most unfavorable prognostic factor of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). However, patients with the same lymph node status have different outcomes, and molecular classifiers for precise prognostic assessments are lacking.

Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling and high-content proliferation screening were performed in eight PSCC and normal tissue pairs and in cell lines. BCL2A1 and AIM2 were selected and further evaluated by qPCR and Western blot. The clinical relevance and prognostic value of the target genes were validated via immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 220 PSCC patients with a defined pN stage. Finally, the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of BCL2A1 and AIM2 were investigated in vitro and in vivo.

Results: BCL2A1 and AIM2 were both upregulated in PSCC tissues and associated mostly with cell proliferation. Staining for either BCL2A1 or AIM2 revealed that both are correlated with pN status, extranodal extension, clinical stage and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Compared to patients who are single-positive or double-negative for BCL2A1 and AIM2, those overexpressing both genes had a higher risk of tumor progression and the poorest survival in the pN0 (5-year CSS: 63.3% vs. 94.9% and 100.0%, respectively, p = 0.000) and pN+ subsets (5-year CSS: 24.1% vs. 45.7% and 55.1%, respectively, p = 0.035). Molecular biofunction and mechanistic studies demonstrated that BCL2A1 and AIM2 knockdown inhibited tumorigenesis via the AIM2/NF-κB/BCL2A1/MAPK/c-Myc signaling pathway.

Conclusions: BCL2A1 and AIM2 promote PSCC progression. Integrating BCL2A1 and AIM2 as novel molecular classifiers with pN stage provides additional information for the prognosis and treatment of PSCC patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive penile cancer: current evidence and knowledge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the latest in penile cancer treatment focusing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with regional lymph node involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with regional lymph node involvement from penile cancer still suffer from a poor prognosis, and the chances to achieve cure are primarily dependent on the extent of the disease. Despite multiple lines of research are indicating the need for a multimodal management of the disease upfront, the search for newer effective systemic therapies is ongoing. The available guidelines currently suggest the use of combination chemotherapy regimens including taxanes and cisplatin as induction therapy before lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced disease (i.e., fixed or bulky inguinal lymph nodes or pelvic lymph node involvement). Research in the field will aim to provide more effective systemic therapies also in patients with a more limited disease spread to further improve the outcomes. Data from the literature also indicate the possibility to effectively administer postoperative chemotherapy in selected high-risk patients.

SUMMARY

We aimed to provide the evidence from the literature and the new avenues that would help delineating the optimal therapeutic pathway for these complex patients, commenting on the new opportunities that may come from the ongoing research.

A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk-calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m-R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Positive surgical margins, pN₃ , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2-year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19-37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m-R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts (P > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.

Optimising the selection of candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy amongst patients with node-positive penile squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of poor overall survival (OS) amongst patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) with clinical inguinal lymphadenopathy (cN+), in order to define the best candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using an international, multicentre database of 924 patients with pSCC, we identified 334 men who harboured cN+ with available clinical and follow-up data. Lymph node involvement was defined either by the presence of palpable inguinal node disease or by preoperative computed tomography (CT) assessment. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (¹⁸ F-FDG-PET)/CT scan was performed based on clinical judgment of the treating physician. Regression-tree analysis generated a risk stratification tool for prediction of 24-month overall mortality (OM). Kaplan-Meier explored the OS benefit related to the use of NAC according to the regression-tree-stratified subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 120 (35.9%), 152 (45.5%), and 62 (18.6%) patients harboured cN1, cN2, and cN3 disease. ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT was performed in 48 (14.4%) patients, and 16 (4.8%) had inguinal and pelvic nodal PET detection. The median OS was 107 months, with a 24-month OS of 66%. At regression-tree analysis (area under the curve = 70%), patients with cN3 and cN2 with PET/CT-detected inguinal and pelvic nodal activity had a higher risk of 24-month OM (>50%). NAC was associated with improved 24-month OS rates (54% vs 33%) only in this subgroup of patients (P = 0.002), which was also confirmed after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.62; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pSCC with cN3 or cN2 and inguinal and pelvic 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan detected disease had higher 24-month OM rates according to our regression-tree model. NAC was associated with improved OS only in these subgroups of patients. Our novel decision model may help to stratify cN+ patients, and identify those who most likely will benefit from NAC prior to radical surgical resection.

Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 532 patients who underwent inguinal LN dissection (ILND) across tertiary referral centres from Europe, China, Brazil and North America were retrospectively evaluated. From this cohort, 198 patients received pelvic LND (PLND).We identified threshold values for ILND and PLND using receiver operating characteristic curves. We tested prognostic value of LNY for recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meir method and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile [IQR]) age was 59 (49-68) years and the median (IQR) follow-up after ILND was 28 (12-68.2) months. Overall, 85% of the patients had bilateral dissections. The median (IQR) number of inguinal LNs removed was 15 (10-22). Of those receiving PLND, The median (IQR) number of LNs was 13 (8-19). A LNY of ≥15 was used for dichotomisation of ILND patients, and a LNY of ≥9 was used in the PLND cohort. Patients with a LNY ≥15 had significantly better 5-year OS vs patients with a LNY <15 (70.1% vs 58.7%). On multivariable analyses, a LNY ≥15 was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, P = 0.029). For cN0 patients, a LNY ≥15 was an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.52, P = 0.043) and OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.021). In the PLND cohort, a LNY ≥9 was a predictor of RFS (HR 0.53, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Using one of the largest LND datasets to date, we found LNY to be a significant predictor of outcomes after lymphatic staging for penile SCC. Prospective validation is warranted.

Nomogram-based prediction of overall survival after regional lymph node dissection and the role of perioperative chemotherapy in penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To improve the prognostic allocation of patients with penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) receiving regional lymph node dissection (LND).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An international, multicenter, retrospective study was performed on patients with PSCC who received regional LND, with or without perioperative therapy, from 1980 to 2017. We first used a random forest (RF) method with missing data imputation. Additionally, data were modeled using Cox proportional hazard regression, and a Cox model was also fit including prespecified variables. Based on the latter model, a nomogram for estimating 12-month and 24-month overall survival (OS) was developed.

RESULTS

There were 743 patients who received LND at 7 referral centers from Europe, the USA, Brazil, and China. Of these patients, 689 were analyzed: 86 (12.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); 171 (24.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 74 (10.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The variables significantly associated with OS were age (P < 0.001), the pathologically involved/total removed LN ratio (P < 0.001), pN stage (overall P < 0.001), and NAC (P = 0.013). NAC and AC were ineffective in N1-2 patients (clinical and pathological, respectively), whereas they provided OS improvements in N3 patients. Finally, we developed a nomogram predicting 12- and 24-month OS based on prespecified variables (c-index: 0.75). The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a tool that can be offered as an aid to physicians to enhance decision-making, clinical research, and patient counseling whenever LND is needed for PSCC. Administration of NAC and AC should be restricted to clinical and pathological N3 patients, respectively.