1
|
Alessi S, Maggioni R, Luzzago S, Summers PE, Renne G, Zugni F, Belmonte M, Raimondi S, Vignati S, Mistretta FA, Di Meglio L, D'Ascoli E, Scarabelli A, Marvaso G, De Cobelli O, Musi G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Curigliano G, Petralia G. Association between mpMRI detected tumor apparent diffusion coefficient and 5-year biochemical recurrence risk after radical prostatectomy. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024:10.1007/s11547-024-01857-0. [PMID: 39014292 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01857-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the ability of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict the risk of 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included 1207 peripheral and 232 non-peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent mpMRI before RP (2012-2015), with the outcome of interest being 5-year BCR. ADC was evaluated as a continuous variable and as categories: low (< 850 µm2/s), intermediate (850-1100 µm2/s), and high (> 1100 µm2/s). Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing of BCR-free survival, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were formed to estimate the risk of BCR. RESULTS Among the 1439 males with median age 63 (± 7) years, the median follow-up was 59 months, and 306 (25%) patients experienced BCR. Peripheral zone PCa patients with BCR had lower tumor ADC values than those without BCR (874 versus 1025 µm2/s, p < 0.001). Five-year BCR-free survival rates were 52.3%, 74.4%, and 87% for patients in the low, intermediate, and high ADC value categories, respectively (p < 0.0001). Lower ADC was associated with BCR, both as continuously coded variable (HR: 5.35; p < 0.001) and as ADC categories (intermediate versus high ADC-HR: 1.56, p = 0.017; low vs. high ADC-HR; 2.36, p < 0.001). In the non-peripheral zone PCa patients, no association between ADC and BCR was observed. CONCLUSION Tumor ADC values and categories were found to be predictive of the 5-year BCR risk after RP in patients with peripheral zone PCa and may serve as a prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Division of Uropathology and Intraoperative Diagnostic Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Maddalena Belmonte
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvano Vignati
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Di Meglio
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Ascoli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Scarabelli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yin X, Wu Y, Song J. Characteristics of the immune environment in prostate cancer as an adjunct to immunotherapy. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e2148. [PMID: 38988627 PMCID: PMC11233410 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims The tumor microenvironment (TME) exerts an important role in carcinogenesis and progression. Several investigations have suggested that immune cell infiltration (ICI) is of high prognostic importance for tumor progression and patient survival in many tumors, particularly prostate cancer. The pattern of immune infiltration of PCa, on the other hand, has not been thoroughly understood. Methods The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets on PCa were obtained, and several datasets were merged into one data set using the "ComBat" algorithm. The ICI profiles of PCa patients were then to be uncovered by two computer techniques. The unsupervised clustering method was utilized to identify three ICI patterns in tumor samples, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted to estimate the ICI score. Results Three different clusters of three ICIs were identified in 1341 PCa samples, which also correlated with different clinical features/characteristics and biological pathways. Patients with PCa are classified into high and low subtypes based on the ICI scores extracted from immune-associated signature genes. High ICI score subtypes are associated with a worse prognosis, which may intrigue the activation of cancer-related and immune-related pathways such as pathways involving Toll-like receptors, T-cell receptors, JAK-STAT, and natural killer cells. The ICI score was linked to tumor mutation load and immune/cancer-relevant signaling pathways, which explain prostate cancer's poor prognosis. Conclusion The findings of this study not only advanced our knowledge of the mechanism of immune response in the prostate tumor microenvironment but also provided a novel biomarker, that is, the ICI score, for disease prognosis and guiding precision immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinhai Yin
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital Guiyang China
| | - Yadong Wu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang China
| | - Jukun Song
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turco F, Buttigliero C, Delcuratolo MD, Gillessen S, Vogl UM, Zilli T, Fossati N, Gallina A, Farinea G, Di Stefano RF, Calabrese M, Saporita I, Crespi V, Poletto S, Palesandro E, Di Maio M, Scagliotti GV, Tucci M. Hormonal Agents in Localized and Advanced Prostate Cancer: Current Use and Future Perspectives. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102138. [PMID: 38996529 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is generally a hormone-dependent tumor. Androgen deprivation therapy ( has been the standard of care in metastatic disease for more than 80 years. Subsequent studies have highlighted the efficacy of ADT even in earlier disease settings such as in localized disease or in the case of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Improved knowledge of PC biology and ADT resistance mechanisms have led to the development of novel generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Initially used only in patients who became resistant to ADT, ARPI have subsequently shown to be effective when used in patients with metastatic hormone-naive disease and in recent years their effectiveness has also been evaluated in localized disease and in case of BCR. The objective of this review is to describe the current role of agents interfering with the androgen receptor in different stages of PC and to point out future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Turco
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Marco Donatello Delcuratolo
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Oncology, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Canton Ticino, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Farinea
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Rosario Francesco Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Mariangela Calabrese
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Isabella Saporita
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Veronica Crespi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Stefano Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Erica Palesandro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Piedmont, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Achard V, Tombal B. All Biochemical Recurrences Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal than Others. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02402-3. [PMID: 38871522 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Verane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Serafin E, Orlando R, Mazzucato G, Ornaghi PI, Cianflone F, Montanaro F, Artoni F, Baielli A, Ditonno F, Migliorini F, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Prognostic Impact and Clinical Implications of Adverse Tumor Grade in Very Favorable Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Experience of a Single Tertiary Referral Center. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2137. [PMID: 38893256 PMCID: PMC11171498 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic impact and predictors of adverse tumor grade in very favorable low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS Data of low- and intermediate PCa risk-class patients were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Adverse tumor grade was defined as pathology ISUP grade group > 2. Disease progression was defined as a biochemical recurrence event and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were assessed by Cox's proportional hazards and logistic regression model. RESULTS Between January 2013 and October 2020, the study evaluated a population of 289 patients, including 178 low-risk cases (61.1%) and 111 intermediate-risk subjects (38.4%); unfavorable tumor grade was detected in 82 cases (28.4%). PCa progression, which occurred in 29 patients (10%), was independently predicted by adverse tumor grade and biopsy ISUP grade group 2, with the former showing stronger associations (hazard ratio, HR = 4.478; 95% CI: 1.840-10.895; p = 0.001) than the latter (HR = 2.336; 95% CI: 1.057-5.164; p = 0.036). Older age and biopsy ISUP grade group 2 were independent clinical predictors of adverse tumor grade, associated with larger tumors that eventually presented non-organ-confined disease. CONCLUSIONS In a very favorable PCa patient population, adverse tumor grade was an unfavorable prognostic factor for disease progression. Active surveillance in very favorable intermediate-risk patients is still a hazard, so molecular and genetic testing of biopsy specimens is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | | | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Cianflone
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Das S, Luu M, Terris M, Klaassen Z, Kane CJ, Amling C, Cooperberg M, Rivera LG, Aronson W, Freedland SJ, Daskivich TJ. Contemporary risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the active surveillance era. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:175.e1-175.e8. [PMID: 38490923 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether contemporary risks of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in the AS era differ from historical estimates due to changes in tumor risk case mix and improvements in risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS We sampled 6,682 men who underwent RP for clinically localized disease between 2000 and 2017 from the VA SEARCH database. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to calculate incidence of BCR before and after 2010 overall and within tumor risk subgroups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis including an interaction term between era and tumor risk was used to compare risk of BCR before and after 2010 overall and across tumor risk subgroups. RESULTS About 3,492 (52%) and 3,190 (48%) men underwent RP before and after 2010, respectively. In a limited multivariable model excluding tumor risk, overall BCR risk was higher post-2010 vs. pre-2010 (HR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.05-1.25; 40% vs 36% at 8 years post-RP). However, this effect was eliminated after correcting for tumor risk (HR: 0.95, 95%CI: 0.87-1.04), suggesting that differences in tumor risk between eras mediated the change. Yet, within tumor-risk subgroups, BCR risk was significantly lower for favorable intermediate-risk (HR: 0.76, 95%CI:0.60-0.96) and unfavorable intermediate-risk PC (HR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.67-0.90), but significantly higher for high-risk PC (HR: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.07-1.38) in the post-2010 era. 8-year risks of BCR in the post-2010 era were 21% (95%CI: 16%-25%), 25% (95%CI: 20%-30%), 41% (95%CI: 37%-46%), and 60% (95%CI: 56%-64%) for low-, FIR-, UIR-, and high-risk disease, respectively. Limitations include limited long-term follow-up in the post-2010 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Overall BCR risk has increased in the AS era, driven by a higher risk case mix and increased BCR risk among high-risk patients. Physicians should quote contemporary estimates of BCR when counseling patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Das
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC; Department of Urology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Michael Luu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Martha Terris
- Division of Urology, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA; Department of Urology, Augusta University-Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA; Department of Urology, Augusta University-Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | | | | | - Matthew Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Section of Urology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lourdes Guerrios Rivera
- VA Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, PR; Department of Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR
| | - William Aronson
- Department of Urology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC; Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Timothy J Daskivich
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ekanger C, Helle SI, Reisæter L, Hysing LB, Kvåle R, Honoré A, Gravdal K, Pilskog S, Dahl O. Salvage Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Study With 7.2 Years of Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1934-1942. [PMID: 38652872 PMCID: PMC11191049 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no well-established re-treatment options for local recurrence after primary curative radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), as prospective studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. Here, we present results from a prospective study on focal salvage reirradiation with external-beam radiation therapy with a median follow-up of 7.2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2013 to 2017, 38 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent PCa >2 years after previous treatment and absence of grade 2-3 toxicity from the first course of radiation were included. The treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions to the MRI-based target volume and 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy starting 3 months before radiation. The Phoenix criteria defined biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), and toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS Median age was 70 years, and median time from primary radiation to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence was 83 months. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year bRFS were 81% (95% CI, 69 to 94) and 58% (95% CI, 49 to 74), respectively. The actuarial 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 93% (95% CI, 82 to 100), metastasis-free survival was 82% (95% CI, 69 to 95), and overall survival was 87% (95% CI, 76 to 98). Two patients (5%) had durable grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, one combined with GI grade 3 toxicity. A PSA doubling time ≤6 months at salvage, a Gleason score >7, and a PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL predicted a worse outcome. CONCLUSION Reirradiation with EBRT for locally recurrent PCa after primary curative radiation therapy is clinically feasible and demonstrated a favorable outcome with acceptable toxicity in this prospective study with long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ekanger
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Svein Inge Helle
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Reisæter
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Liv Bolstad Hysing
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Technology and Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rune Kvåle
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alfred Honoré
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Karsten Gravdal
- Department of Patohology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Technology and Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Olav Dahl
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shore ND, Moul JW, Pienta KJ, Czernin J, King MT, Freedland SJ. Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:192-201. [PMID: 37679602 PMCID: PMC11096125 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00712-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing. OBJECTIVE This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies. METHODS PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). RESULTS European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects. CONCLUSIONS Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Judd W Moul
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Johannes Czernin
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martin T King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Porcaro AB, Costantino S, Brancelli C, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Veccia A, Franceschini A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo RG, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. 2012 Briganti nomogram predict prostate cancer progression in EAU intermediate risk with unfavorable tumor grade: A single center experience. Urologia 2024:3915603241252911. [PMID: 38780183 DOI: 10.1177/03915603241252911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the potential prognostic impact of Briganti's 2012 nomogram in EAU intermediate-risk patients presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade and treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, eventually associated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2013 to December 2021, the study included 179 EAU intermediate-risk patients presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade (ISUP 3), eventually associated with a PSA of 10-20 ng/ml and/or cT-2b. Briganti's 2012 nomogram was assessed as both a continuous and dichotomous variable, categorized according to the median (risk score ⩾7% vs <7%). Disease progression, defined as biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression, was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards in both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Disease progression occurred in 43 (24%) patients after a median (95% CI) follow-up of 78 (65.7-88.4) months. The nomogram risk score predicted disease progression, evaluated both as a continuous variable (hazard ratio, HR = 1.064; 95% CI: 1.035-1.093; p < 0.0001) and as a categorical variable (HR = 3.399; 95% CI: 1.740-6.638; p < 0.0001). This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis, where hazard ratios remained consistent even after adjusting for clinical and pathological factors. CONCLUSIONS In EAU intermediate-risk PCa cases presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade and treated surgically, Briganti's 2012 nomogram was associated with disease progression after surgery. Consequently, as the nomogram risk score increased, patients were more likely to experience PCa progression, facilitating the stratification of the patient population into distinct prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Brancelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giuseppe Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weiner AB, Kakani P, Armstrong AJ, Bossi A, Cornford P, Feng F, Kanabur P, Karnes RJ, Mckay RR, Morgan TM, Schaeffer EM, Shore N, Tree AC, Spratt DE. Risk Stratification of Patients with Recurrence After Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02375-3. [PMID: 38782697 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease state. While BCR is associated with worse oncologic outcomes, risk factors that impact outcomes can vary significantly, necessitating avenues for risk stratification. We sought to identify prognostic risk factors at the time of recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, and prior to salvage treatment(s), associated with adverse oncologic outcomes. METHODS We performed a systematic review of prospective studies in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from January 1, 2000 to October 16, 2023) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (CRD42023466330). We reviewed the factors associated with oncologic outcomes among patients with BCR after primary definitive treatment. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 37 studies were included (total n = 10 632), 25 after prostatectomy (total n = 9010) and 12 after radiotherapy (total n = 1622). Following recurrence after prostatectomy, factors associated with adverse outcomes include higher pathologic T stage and grade group, negative surgical margins, shorter prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT), higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) prior to salvage treatment, shorter time to recurrence, the 22-gene tumor RNA signature, and recurrence location on molecular imaging. After recurrence following radiotherapy, factors associated with adverse outcomes include a shorter time to recurrence, and shorter PSADT or higher PSA velocity. Grade group, T stage, and prior short-term hormone therapy (4-6 mo) were not clearly associated with adverse outcomes, although sample size and follow-up were generally limited compared with postprostatectomy data. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This work highlights the recommendations and level of evidence for risk stratifying patients with PCa recurrence, and can be used as a benchmark for personalizing salvage treatment based on prognostics. PATIENT SUMMARY We summarize the data from previously reported clinical trials on the topic of which factors predict worse cancer outcomes for patients who recur with prostate cancer after their initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Institute for Precision Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Preeti Kakani
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Amethyst Radiotherapy Group, La Garenne Colombes, France
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pratik Kanabur
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Rana R Mckay
- Department of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Poterszman N, Merlin C, Margail C, Ouvrard E, Imperiale A, Somme F. A bicentric retrospective study of the correlation of EAU BCR risk groups with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detection in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10908. [PMID: 38740809 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61121-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy: ISUP < 4 and PSA doubling time (PSAdt) > 12 months for low risk, and ISUP ≥ 4 or PSAdt ≤ 12 months for high risk. This dual-center retrospective study aims to investigate the correlation between the EAU risk stratification for BCR following radical prostatectomy and the detection rate of lesions using 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Among the 71 included patients (58 high-risk, 13 low-risk), with a median PSA level of 1.43 ng/ml, PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher positivity in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group (72.4% vs. 38.0%, p = 0.026). Analysis of recurrence sites revealed a similar proportion of pelvic-confined disease in both groups (24.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.935), but a significantly higher incidence of metastatic disease in the high-risk group (51.7% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.017), with detailed findings indicating an increased prevalence of bone metastases in the high-risk BCR group (37.8% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.048). Therefore, PSMA PET/CT offers valuable insights for treatment decisions, aligning with the evolving landscape of prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Poterszman
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rueueue Albert Calmette, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Charles Merlin
- Nuclear Medicine, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Charles Margail
- Nuclear Medicine, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rueueue Albert Calmette, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rueueue Albert Calmette, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- Molecular Imaging-DRHIM, IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, Strasbourg, France
| | - François Somme
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rueueue Albert Calmette, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vermassen T, Lumen N, Van Praet C, Callewaert N, Delanghe J, Rottey S. The Association between Urine N-Glycome and Prognosis after Initial Therapy for Primary Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1039. [PMID: 38791001 PMCID: PMC11118943 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Next to prostate-specific antigen, no biochemical biomarkers have been implemented to guide patient follow-up after primary therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated the prognostic potential of urine N-glycome in terms of event-free survival (EFS) in patients undergoing primary therapy for PCa. The prognostic features of the urine N-glycosylation profile at diagnosis, assessed in 77 PCa patients, were determined in terms of EFS next to standard clinical parameters. The majority of patients were diagnosed with International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≤ 3 (82%) T1-2 tumors (79%) and without pelvic lymph node invasion (96%). The patients underwent active surveillance (14%), robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (48%), or external beam radiotherapy (37%). Decreased ratios of biantennary core-fucosylation were noted in patients who developed an event, which was linked to a shorter EFS in both the intention-to-treat cohort and all subcohort analyses. Combining the urine N-glycan biomarker with the D'Amico Risk Classification for PCa resulted in an improved nomogram for patient classification after primary therapy. The rate of urine N-glycan biantennary core-fucosylation, typically linked to more aggressive disease status, is lower in patients who eventually developed an event following primary therapy and subsequently in patients with a worse EFS. The combination of urine N-glycan biomarkers together with clinical parameters could, therefore, improve the post-therapy follow-up of patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijl Vermassen
- Department Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Biomarkers in Cancer, Department Basic and Applied Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department Urology (ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charles Van Praet
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department Urology (ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Uro-Oncology Research Group, Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nico Callewaert
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
- Department Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joris Delanghe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Department Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Biomarkers in Cancer, Department Basic and Applied Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Drug Research Unit Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lai C, Wu Z, Li Z, Huang X, Hu Z, Yu H, Yuan Z, Shi J, Hu J, Mulati Y, Liu C, Xu K. Single-cell analysis extracted CAFs-related genes to established online app to predict clinical outcome and radiotherapy prognosis of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:1240-1255. [PMID: 38070051 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03348-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a significant role in regulating the clinical outcome and radiotherapy prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study is to identify CAFs-related genes (CAFsRGs) using single-cell analysis and evaluate their potential for predicting the prognosis and radiotherapy prognosis in PCa. METHODS We acquire transcriptome and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) results of PCa and normal adjacent tissues from The GEO and TCGA databases. The "MCPcounter" and "EPIC" R packages were used to assess the infiltration level of CAFs and examine their correlation with PCa prognosis. ScRNA-seq and differential gene expression analyses were used to extract CAFsRGs. We also applied COX and LASSO analysis to further construct a risk score (CAFsRS) to assess biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and radiotherapy prognosis of PCa. The predictive efficacy of CAFsRS was evaluated by ROC curves and subgroup analysis. Finally, we integrated the CAFsRS gene signature with relevant clinical features to develop a nomogram, enhancing the predictive accuracy. RESULTS The abundance of CAFs is associated with a poor prognosis of PCa patients. ScRNA-seq and differential gene expression analysis revealed 323 CAFsRGs. After COX and LASSO analysis, we obtained seven CAFsRGs with prognostic significance (PTGS2, FKBP10, ENG, CDH11, COL5A1, COL5A2, and SRD5A2). Additionally, we established a risk score model based on the training set (n = 257). The ROC curve was used to confirm the performance of CAFsRS (The AUC values for 1, 3 and 5-year survival were determined to be 0.732, 0.773, and 0.775, respectively.). The testing set (n = 129), GSE70770 set (n = 199) and GSE116918 set (n = 248) revealed that the model exhibited exceptional predictive performance. This was also confirmed by clinical subgroup analysis. The violin plot demonstrated a statistically significant disparity in the CAFs infiltrations between the high-risk and low-risk groups of CAFsRS. Further analysis confirmed that both CAFsRS and T stage were independent prognostic factors for PCa. The nomogram was then established and its excellent predictive performance was demonstrated through calibration and ROC curves. Finally, we developed an online prognostic prediction app ( https://sysu-symh-cafsnomogram.streamlit.app/ ) to facilitate the practical application of the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS The prognostic prediction risk score model we constructed could accurately predict BRFS and radiotherapy prognosis PCa, which can provide new ideas for clinicians to develop personalized PCa treatment and follow-up programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Lai
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhikai Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhuohang Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhensheng Hu
- Department of Medical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihan Yuan
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Juanyi Shi
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jintao Hu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Yelisudan Mulati
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Cheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Kewei Xu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
- Sun Yat-Sen College of Medical Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kikuchi Y, Shimada H, Yamasaki F, Yamashita T, Araki K, Horimoto K, Yajima S, Yashiro M, Yokoi K, Cho H, Ehira T, Nakahara K, Yasuda H, Isobe K, Hayashida T, Hatakeyama S, Akakura K, Aoki D, Nomura H, Tada Y, Yoshimatsu Y, Miyachi H, Takebayashi C, Hanamura I, Takahashi H. Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:512-534. [PMID: 38493447 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02497-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hideaki Shimada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Surgery, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Fumiyuki Yamasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taku Yamashita
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Koji Araki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kohei Horimoto
- Department of Dermatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Masakazu Yashiro
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Therapeutics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keigo Yokoi
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Ehira
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazunari Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Isobe
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsu Hayashida
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Aoki
- International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nomura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuji Tada
- Department of Pulmonology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Yoshimatsu
- Department of Patient-Derived Cancer Model, Tochigi Cancer Center Research Institute, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hayato Miyachi
- Faculty of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Nitobe Bunka College, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Takebayashi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori), Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Hanamura
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mikami H, Noguchi S, Akatsuka J, Hasegawa H, Obayashi K, Takeda H, Endo Y, Toyama Y, Takei H, Kimura G, Kondo Y, Takizawa T. snRNAs from Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Have the Potential to Serve as Prognostic Factors for Clinical Recurrence after Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1757. [PMID: 38730709 PMCID: PMC11083327 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
In patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) after radical prostatectomy (RP), biochemical recurrence (BCR) increases the risk of distant metastasis. Accordingly, additional prognostic biomarkers are required to identify the subpopulation of patients with HRPC who develop clinical recurrence (CR) after BCR. The objective of this study was to identify biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) RP samples that are prognostic for CR in patients with HRPC who experience BCR after RP (post-RP BCR). First, we performed a preliminary RNA sequencing analysis to comprehensively profile RNA expression in FFPE RP samples obtained from patients with HRPC who developed CR after post-RP BCR and found that many snRNAs were very abundant in preserved FFPE samples. Subsequently, we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to compare the expression levels of highly abundant snRNAs in FFPE RP samples from patients with HRPC with and without CR after post-RP BCR (21 CR patients and 46 non-CR patients who had more than 5 years of follow-up after BCR). The qPCR analysis revealed that the expression levels of snRNA RNU1-1/1-2 and RNU4-1 were significantly higher in patients with CR than in patients without CR. These snRNAs were significantly correlated with clinical recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HRPC who experienced post-RP BCR. Furthermore, snRNA RNU1-1/1-2 could serve as an independent prognostic factor for clinical RFS in post-RP BCR of HRPC cases where known prognostic factors (e.g., Gleason score) cannot distinguish between CR and non-CR patients. Our findings provide new insights into the involvement of snRNAs in prostate cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikaru Mikami
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Syunya Noguchi
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Anatomy, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan;
| | - Jun Akatsuka
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hiroya Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Kotaro Obayashi
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hayato Takeda
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Yuki Endo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Yuka Toyama
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Hiroyuki Takei
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan;
| | - Go Kimura
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Yukihiro Kondo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan; (H.M.); (J.A.); (H.H.); (K.O.); (H.T.); (Y.E.); (Y.T.); (G.K.); (Y.K.)
| | - Toshihiro Takizawa
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Anatomy, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hu C, Qiao X, Huang R, Hu C, Bao J, Wang X. Development and Validation of a Multimodality Model Based on Whole-Slide Imaging and Biparametric MRI for Predicting Postoperative Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230143. [PMID: 38758079 PMCID: PMC11148661 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a machine learning multimodality model based on preoperative MRI, surgical whole-slide imaging (WSI), and clinical variables for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study (September 2015 to April 2021), 363 male patients with PCa who underwent RP were divided into training (n = 254; median age, 69 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) and testing (n = 109; median age, 70 years [IQR, 65-75 years]) sets at a ratio of 7:3. The primary end point was biochemical recurrence-free survival. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox algorithm was applied to select independent clinical variables and construct the clinical signature. The radiomics signature and pathomics signature were constructed using preoperative MRI and surgical WSI data, respectively. A multimodality model was constructed by combining the radiomics signature, pathomics signature, and clinical signature. Using Harrell concordance index (C index), the predictive performance of the multimodality model for BCR was assessed and compared with all single-modality models, including the radiomics signature, pathomics signature, and clinical signature. Results Both radiomics and pathomics signatures achieved good performance for BCR prediction (C index: 0.742 and 0.730, respectively) on the testing cohort. The multimodality model exhibited the best predictive performance, with a C index of 0.860 on the testing set, which was significantly higher than all single-modality models (all P ≤ .01). Conclusion The multimodality model effectively predicted BCR following RP in patients with PCa and may therefore provide an emerging and accurate tool to assist postoperative individualized treatment. Keywords: MR Imaging, Urinary, Pelvis, Comparative Studies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Renpeng Huang
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Chunhong Hu
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Jie Bao
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Ximing Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scharl S, Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Serani F, Koerber SA, Debus J, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Kroeze SGC, Guckenberger M, Krafcsik M, Hruby G, Emmett L, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, Spohn SKB, Henkenberens C, Mayer B, Shelan M, Aebersold DM, Thamm R, Wiegel T. European association of urology risk stratification predicts outcome in patients receiving PSMA-PET-planned salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110215. [PMID: 38458259 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a risk stratification (high vs. low risk) for patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Here we investigated whether this stratification accurately predicts outcome, particularly in patients staged with PSMA-PET. METHODS For this study, we used a retrospective database including 1222 PSMA-PET-staged prostate cancer patients who were treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BR, at 11 centers in 5 countries. Patients with lymph node metastases (pN1 or cN1) or unclear EAU risk group were excluded. The remaining cohort comprised 526 patients, including 132 low-risk and 394 high-risk patients. RESULTS The median follow-up time after SRT was 31.0 months. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was 85.7 % in EAU low-risk versus 69.4 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.002). The 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 94.4 % in low-risk versus 87.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.005). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 99.0 % in low-risk versus 99.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.925). In multivariate analysis, EAU risk group remained a statistically significant predictor of BPFS (p = 0.003, HR 2.022, 95 % CI 1.262-3.239) and MFS (p = 0.013, HR 2.986, 95 % CI 1.262-7.058). CONCLUSION Our data support the EAU risk group definition. EAU risk grouping for BCR reliably predicted outcome in patients staged lymph node-negative after RP and with PSMA-PET before SRT. To our knowledge, this is the first study validating the EAU risk grouping in patients treated with PSMA-PET-planned SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | | | | | - Manuel Krafcsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, J L H van Leenders G, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02306-6. [PMID: 38688773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) have been updated. Here we provide a summary of the 2024 guidelines. METHODS The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Risk stratification for relapsing PCa after primary therapy may guide salvage therapy decisions. New treatment options, such as androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs), ARTA + chemotherapy combinations, PARP inhibitors and their combinations, and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapy have become available for men with metastatic PCa. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Evidence for relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant PCa is evolving rapidly. These guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. The full version is available online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/). PATIENT SUMMARY This article summarises the 2024 guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are based on evidence and guide doctors in discussing treatment decisions with their patients. The guidelines are updated every year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie Darraugh
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jan Oldenburg
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, UFR Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yin W, Chen G, Li Y, Li R, Jia Z, Zhong C, Wang S, Mao X, Cai Z, Deng J, Zhong W, Pan B, Lu J. Identification of a 9-gene signature to enhance biochemical recurrence prediction in primary prostate cancer: A benchmarking study using ten machine learning methods and twelve patient cohorts. Cancer Lett 2024; 588:216739. [PMID: 38395379 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy among men worldwide, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a critical turning point commonly used to guide the development of treatment strategies for primary PCa. However, the clinical parameters currently in use are inadequate for precise risk stratification and informing treatment choice. To address this issue, we conducted a study that collected transcriptomic data and clinical information from 1662 primary PCa patients across 12 multicenter cohorts globally. We leveraged 101 algorithm combinations that consisted of 10 machine learning methods to develop and validate a 9-gene signature, named BCR SCR, for predicting the risk of BCR after RP. Our results demonstrated that BCR SCR generally outperformed 102 published prognostic signatures. We further established the clinical significance of these nine genes in PCa progression at the protein level through immunohistochemistry on Tissue Microarray (TMA). Moreover, our data showed that patients with higher BCR SCR tended to have higher rates of BCR and distant metastasis after radical radiotherapy. Through drug target prediction analysis, we identified nine potential therapeutic agents for patients with high BCR SCR. In conclusion, the newly developed BCR SCR has significant translational potential in accurately stratifying the risk of patients who undergo RP, monitoring treatment courses, and developing new therapies for the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjun Yin
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Guo Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Yutong Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Ruidong Li
- Genetics, Genomics, and Bioinformatics Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA
| | - Zhenyu Jia
- Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA
| | - Chuanfan Zhong
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Shuo Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Xiangming Mao
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Zhouda Cai
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junhong Deng
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Weide Zhong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China.
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China.
| | - Jianming Lu
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang J, Li Z, Chen Z, Shi W, Xu Y, Huang Z, Lin Z, Dou R, Lin S, Jiang X, Li M, Jiang S. Comprehensive analysis of macrophage-related genes in prostate cancer by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:6809-6838. [PMID: 38663915 PMCID: PMC11087116 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Macrophages, as essential components of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), could promote growth and invasion in many cancers. However, the role of macrophages in tumor microenvironment (TME) and immunotherapy in PCa is largely unexplored at present. Here, we investigated the roles of macrophage-related genes in molecular stratification, prognosis, TME, and immunotherapeutic response in PCa. Public databases provided single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNAseq data. Using the Seurat R package, scRNA-seq data was processed and macrophage clusters were identified automatically and manually. Using the CellChat R package, intercellular communication analysis revealed that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) interact with other cells in the PCa TME primarily through MIF - (CD74+CXCR4) and MIF - (CD74+CD44) ligand-receptor pairs. We constructed coexpression networks of macrophages using the WGCNA to identify macrophage-related genes. Using the R package ConsensusClusterPlus, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified two distinct macrophage-associated subtypes, which have significantly different pathway activation status, TIME, and immunotherapeutic efficacy. Next, an 8-gene macrophage-related risk signature (MRS) was established through the LASSO Cox regression analysis with 10-fold cross-validation, and the performance of the MRS was validated in eight external PCa cohorts. The high-risk group had more active immune-related functions, more infiltrating immune cells, higher HLA and immune checkpoint gene expression, higher immune scores, and lower TIDE scores. Finally, the NCF4 gene has been identified as the hub gene in MRS using the "mgeneSim" function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jili Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Navy Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihao Li
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhenlin Chen
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wenzhen Shi
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yue Xu
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhangcheng Huang
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zequn Lin
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ruiling Dou
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shaoshan Lin
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Navy Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Mengqiang Li
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shaoqin Jiang
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lu W, Zhao L, Wang S, Zhang H, Jiang K, Ji J, Chen S, Wang C, Wei C, Zhou R, Wang Z, Li X, Wang F, Wei X, Hou W. Explainable and visualizable machine learning models to predict biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03480-x. [PMID: 38602643 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03480-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Machine learning (ML) models presented an excellent performance in the prognosis prediction. However, the black box characteristic of ML models limited the clinical applications. Here, we aimed to establish explainable and visualizable ML models to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 647 PCa patients were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical parameters were identified using LASSO regression. Then, cohort was split into training and validation datasets with a ratio of 0.75:0.25 and BCR-related features were included in Cox regression and five ML algorithm to construct BCR prediction models. The clinical utility of each model was evaluated by concordance index (C-index) values and decision curve analyses (DCA). Besides, Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were used to explain the features in the models. RESULTS We identified 11 BCR-related features using LASSO regression, then establishing five ML-based models, including random survival forest (RSF), survival support vector machine (SSVM), survival Tree (sTree), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and a Cox regression model, C-index were 0.846 (95%CI 0.796-0.894), 0.774 (95%CI 0.712-0.834), 0.757 (95%CI 0.694-0.818), 0.820 (95%CI 0.765-0.869), 0.793 (95%CI 0.735-0.852), and 0.807 (95%CI 0.753-0.858), respectively. The DCA showed that RSF model had significant advantages over all models. In interpretability of ML models, the SHAP value demonstrated the tangible contribution of each feature in RSF model. CONCLUSIONS Our score system provide reference for the identification for BCR, and the crafting of a framework for making therapeutic decisions for PCa on a personalized basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Lu
- Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co-Constructed By the Province and Ministry, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Shenfan Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Huiyong Zhang
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Kangxian Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Ji
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaohua Chen
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Chengbang Wang
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunmeng Wei
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Rongbin Zhou
- Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co-Constructed By the Province and Ministry, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Zuheng Wang
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Li
- Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co-Constructed By the Province and Ministry, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Fubo Wang
- Collaborative Innovation Centre of Regenerative Medicine and Medical BioResource Development and Application Co-Constructed By the Province and Ministry, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning City, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China.
- School of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xuedong Wei
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 210000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wenlei Hou
- Information Technology School of Guangxi Police College, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Arroyo-Rojas Y, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Colandrea G, Otaola Arca H, Lanz C, Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Macek P, Cathelineau X. The role of androgen deprivation therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:141-147. [PMID: 38742549 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05630-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) are prone to have worse pathological features, resulting in early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). There is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies for this group of patients to optimize their outcomes. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the role of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) followed by RP in HRPCa patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of the following databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinical Trial.gov; between January 2007 and August 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After screening and deduplication, we included ten studies from an initial pool of 1275. The risk of bias was low in observational studies but ranged from moderate to low in controlled trials. Five studies utilized traditional androgen deprivation treatments (ADT), revealing favorable pathological outcomes but inconsistency in evaluating oncological results. Additionally, four studies focused on RP combined with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in the NHT setting, all showing primarily positive pathological outcome, with no clear evidence of an oncological benefit. Limited long-term follow-up data and a shortage of randomized controlled trials were evident among all the studies included in this review, regardless of the type of hormonal treatment used. CONCLUSIONS Different hormonal treatments, including traditional ADT and ARPIs, yield positive pathology outcomes. Oncological evidence remains limited, echoing older findings predating ARPIs. Definitive conclusions require longer follow-ups and precise patient selection. Currently, insufficient evidence support ARPIs' superiority over conventional therapy before RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yenny Arroyo-Rojas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Torrecardenas, Almeria, Spain
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Hugo Otaola Arca
- Department of Urology, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
- Faculty of Medicine, Clínica Alemana, Desarrollo University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Camille Lanz
- Department of Urology, Montsouris Mutualiste Institute, Paris, France
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Montsouris Mutualiste Institute, Paris, France
| | | | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Montsouris Mutualiste Institute, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sun L, Tuo Z, Chen X, Wang H, Lyu Z, Li G. Identification of cell differentiation trajectory-related gene signature to reveal the prognostic significance and immune landscape in prostate cancer based on multiomics analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27628. [PMID: 38510027 PMCID: PMC10950568 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In the context of prostate cancer (PCa), the occurrence of biochemical recurrence (BCR) stands out as a pivotal factor significantly impacting prognosis, potentially leading to metastasis and mortality. However, the early detection of BCR poses a substantial challenge for PCa patients. There is an urgent need to pinpoint hub genes that can serve as predictive indicators for BCR in PCa patients. Methods Our primary goal was to identify cell differentiation trajectory-related gene signature in PCa patients by pseudo-time trajectory analysis. We further explored the functional enrichment of overlapped marker genes and probed clinically relevant modules and BCR-related genes using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) in PCa patients. Key genes predicting recurrence-free survival were meticulously identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Subsequently, these genes were utilized to construct a prognostic gene signature, the expression, predictive efficacy, putative functions, and immunological landscape of which were thoroughly validated. Additionally, we employed immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a western blotting assay to quantify the expression of PYCR1 in clinical samples. Results Our single-cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing analysis unveiled three subgroups characterized by distinct differentiation trajectories, and the marker genes associated with these groups were extracted from PCa patients. These marker genes successfully classified the PCa sample into two molecular subtypes, demonstrating a robust correlation with clinical characteristics and recurrence-free survival. Through WGCNA and Lasso analysis, we identified four hub genes (KLK3, CD38, FASN, and PYCR1) to construct a risk profile of prognostic genes linked to BCR. Notably, the high-risk patient group exhibited elevated levels of B cell naive, Macrophage M0, and Macrophage M2 infiltration, while the low-risk group displayed higher levels of T cells CD4 memory activated and monocyte infiltration. Furthermore, IHC and western blotting assays confirmed the heightened expression of PYCR1 in PCa tissues. Conclusion This study leveraged the differentiation trajectory and genetic variability of the microenvironment to uncover crucial prognostic genes associated with BCR in PCa patients. These findings present novel perspectives for tailoring treatment strategies for PCa patients on an individualized basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangxue Sun
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center, Hefei, China
- Department of Urology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China
| | - Zhouting Tuo
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Huming Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhaojie Lyu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Guangyuan Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center, Hefei, China
- The Lu’ an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Lu’ an, China
- The Lu’ an People’s Hospital, Lu’ an, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baas DJH, de Baaij JMS, Sedelaar JPM, Hoekstra RJ, Vrijhof HJEJ, Somford DM, van Basten JPA. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is an independent risk factor for major complications. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:140. [PMID: 38554195 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01881-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the major postoperative complication rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to identify related risk factors. A consecutive series of patients who underwent RARP between September 2016 and May 2021, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were analyzed for postoperative complications that occurred within 30 days following surgery. Potential risk factors related to complications were identified by means of a multivariate logistic analysis. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for the occurrence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) on a per patient level. A multivariate logistic regression with risk factors was performed to identify contributors to complications. In total, 1280 patients were included, of whom 79 (6.2%) experienced at least 1 major complication. Concomitant ePLND was performed in 609 (48%) of patients. The majority of all complications were likely related to the surgical procedure, with anastomotic leakage and lymphoceles being the most common. Upon multivariate analysis, performing ePLND remained the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of major complications (OR 2.26, p = 0.001). In contrast to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy alone, the combination with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) has a substantial risk of serious complications. Since the ePLND is performed mainly for staging purpose, the clinical contribution of the ePLND has to be reconsidered with the present use of the PSMA-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J H Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joost M S de Baaij
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J E J Vrijhof
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kano H, Kadono Y, Naito R, Makino T, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H, Kawaguchi S, Nohara T, Shigehara K, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Potential Treatment for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1304. [PMID: 38610982 PMCID: PMC11011007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unknown, and its usefulness in Japanese practice needs to be investigated. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 85 patients who underwent RARP and were selected for intermittent ADT for postoperative recurrence at Kanazawa University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. Intermittent ADT was administered for 2 years. If prostate-specific antigen levels increased post-treatment, intermittent ADT was reinitiated. The median follow-up period was 47 months. RESULTS The 73 patients had completed the initial course of ADT, and 12 were under initial ADT. The 5-year castration-resistant prostate-cancer-free survival rates, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 92.7%, 98.3%, and 94.7%, respectively. A subgroup analysis of 69 patients who completed intermittent ADT was conducted to evaluate the BCR rate following initial ADT. The 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 53.2%. Multivariate analysis identified testosterone ≤ 0.03 ng/mL during ADT as the sole predictor of BCR after ADT. CONCLUSIONS Salvage intermittent ADT may be an effective treatment option for BCR after RARP. In addition, it would be useful to confirm strong testosterone suppression as a criterion for transition to intermittent therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Kano
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Yoshifumi Kadono
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
- Department of Nephrology and Urology, Japanese Red Cross Fukui Hospital, Fukui 918-8501, Japan
| | - Renato Naito
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Tomoyuki Makino
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Hiroaki Iwamoto
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Hiroshi Yaegashi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Shohei Kawaguchi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Takahiro Nohara
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Kazuyoshi Shigehara
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Kouji Izumi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Atsushi Mizokami
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan; (H.K.); (R.N.); (T.M.); (H.I.); (H.Y.); (S.K.); (T.N.); (K.S.); (K.I.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Porcaro AB, Orlando R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Mazzucato G, Serafin E, Veccia A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo R, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression in surgically treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with favorable tumor grade group eventually associated with some adverse factors. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:134. [PMID: 38520651 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01886-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic potential of the 2012 Briganti nomogram for pelvic lymph node invasion on disease progression after surgery in intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients with favorable tumor grade (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 or 2), eventually associated with adverse clinical features as PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage T2b. All IR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and eventually extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the Department of Urology of the Integrated University Hospital of Verona between 2013 and 2021, with the abovementioned features, and available follow-up were considered. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score was assessed both as a continuous and dichotomous variable, where a mean risk score of 4% was used a threshold. The independent predictor status of the nomogram score on disease progression defined as the occurrence of biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression was evaluated using the Cox regression analysis. Overall, 348 patients were enrolled in the study. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 98 (83.5-112.4) months. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, PCa progression, which occurred in 65 (18.7%) cases, was independently predicted only by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score evaluated as a continuous variable, among all considered clinical features (HR 1.16; 95%CI 1.08-1.24; p < 0.001). In addition, patients presenting with a nomogram score ≥ 4% were more likely to experience disease progression even after adjustment for clinical (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.02-4.79; p = 0.043) and pathological (HR 1.80; 95%CI 1.06-3.05; p = 0.031) factors. In the examined patient population, the 2012 Briganti nomogram predicted PCa progression after surgery. Accordingly, as the risk score increased, patients were more likely to progress, independently by the occurrence of adverse pathology in the surgical specimen. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score categorized according to the mean value allowed to identify prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pierangelo Treccani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sasaki T, Ebara S, Tatenuma T, Ikehata Y, Nakayama A, Kawase M, Toide M, Yoneda T, Sakaguchi K, Teishima J, Makiyama K, Kitamura H, Saito K, Koie T, Koga F, Urakami S, Inoue T. Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94). World J Urol 2024; 42:152. [PMID: 38483586 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no definitive prognostic factors for patients with pathological Grade Group 5 (pGG 5) prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing robot-associated radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors among patients with pGG 5 PCa in a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94). METHODS This retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2021 at ten centers in Japan and included 3195 patients. Patients with clinically metastatic PCa (cN1 or cM1) and those receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Finally, 217 patients with pGG5 PCa were analyzed. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 28.0 months. The 3- and 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) rates of the overall population were 66.1% and 57.7%, respectively. The optimal threshold value (47.2%) for the percentage of positive cancer cores (PPCC) with any GG by systematic biopsy was chosen based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Univariate analysis revealed that the prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, pT, pN, positive surgical margins (PSMs), lymphovascular invasion, and PPCC were independent prognostic factors for BCRFS. A multivariate analysis revealed that PSMs and PPCC were independent prognostic factors for BCRFS. Using these two predictors, we stratified BCRFS, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and castration-resistant PCa-free survival (CRPC-FS) among patients with pGG 5 PCa. CONCLUSION The combination of PSMs and PPCC may be an important predictor of BCRFS, MFS, and CRPC-FS in patients with pGG 5 PCa undergoing RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Shin Ebara
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | | | - Akinori Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Toide
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | | - Kazutaka Saito
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cui F, Qiu Y, Xu W, Zou C, Fan Y. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:305. [PMID: 38448818 PMCID: PMC10916317 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12029-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A consensus has not been reached on the value of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a predictor of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between PSAD and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after primary treatment. METHODS Two authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases (up to August September 10, 2023) to identify studies that assessed the value of pretreatment PSAD in predicting biochemical recurrence after primary treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) of prostate cancer. A random effect model was used to pool adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for biochemical recurrence. RESULTS Nine studies with 4963 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The reported prevalence of biochemical recurrence ranged from 4 to 55.1%. For patients with higher PSAD compared to those with low PSAD, the pooled HR of biochemical recurrence was 1.59 (95% CI 1.21-2.10). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR of biochemical recurrence was 1.80 (95% CI 1.34-2.42) for patients who received radical prostatectomy, and 0.98 (95% CI 0.66-1.45) for patients who received radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Elevated pretreatment PSAD may be an independent predictor for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Determining PSAD could potentially improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feilun Cui
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Taizhou Second People's Hospital of Yangzhou University , 225500, Taizhou, China
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University , 212002, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Yue Qiu
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, 225500, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, 225500, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Chen Zou
- Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School Nanjing University, No. 1 Lijiang Road, 215163, Suzhou, China.
| | - Yu Fan
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, 225500, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koerber SA, Höcht S, Aebersold D, Albrecht C, Boehmer D, Ganswindt U, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Hölscher T, Mueller AC, Niehoff P, Peeken JC, Pinkawa M, Polat B, Spohn SKB, Wolf F, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Wiegel T. Prostate cancer and elective nodal radiation therapy for cN0 and pN0-a never ending story? : Recommendations from the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:181-187. [PMID: 38273135 PMCID: PMC10876748 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
For prostate cancer, the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for cN0 or pN0 patients has been under discussion for years. Considering the recent publications of randomized controlled trials, the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aimed to discuss and summarize the current literature. Modern trials have been recently published for both treatment-naïve patients (POP-RT trial) and patients after surgery (SPPORT trial). Although there are more reliable data to date, we identified several limitations currently complicating the definitions of general recommendations. For patients with cN0 (conventional or PSMA-PET staging) undergoing definitive radiotherapy, only men with high-risk factors for nodal involvement (e.g., cT3a, GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml) seem to benefit from ENI. For biochemical relapse in the postoperative situation (pN0) and no PSMA imaging, ENI may be added to patients with risk factors according to the SPPORT trial (e.g., GS ≥ 8; PSA > 0.7 ng/ml). If PSMA-PET/CT is negative, ENI may be offered for selected men with high-risk factors as an individual treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - S Höcht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Potsdam, Charlottenstraße 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany
| | - D Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstraße 4, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Albrecht
- Nordstrahl Radiation Oncology Unit, Nürnberg North Hospital, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90149, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - D Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - N-S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - T Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fiedlerstraße 19, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - A-C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RKH Hospital Ludwigsburg, Posilipostraße 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - P Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - J C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - M Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Janker Klinik, Villenstraße 8, 53129, Bonn, Germany
| | - B Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - S K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Wolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - C Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, 1, Nikis Avenue, Agios Athanasios, 4108, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - D Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Franco PN, Frade-Santos S, García-Baizán A, Paredes-Velázquez L, Aymerich M, Sironi S, Otero-García MM. An MRI assessment of prostate cancer local recurrence using the PI-RR system: diagnostic accuracy, inter-observer reliability among readers with variable experience, and correlation with PSA values. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1790-1803. [PMID: 37646815 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09949-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system has been recently proposed to promote standardisation in the MR assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) local recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to evaluate PI-RR's diagnostic accuracy, assess the inter-observer reliability among readers with variable experience, and correlate imaging results with anatomopathological and laboratory parameters. METHODS Patients who underwent a pelvic MRI for suspicion of PCa local recurrence after RP or RT were retrospectively enrolled (October 2017-February 2020). PI-RR scores were independently assessed for each patient by five readers with variable experience in prostate MRI (two senior and three junior radiologists). Biochemical data and histopathological features were collected. The reference standard was determined through biochemical, imaging, or histopathological follow-up data. Reader's diagnostic performance was assessed using contingency tables. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to measure inter-observer reliability. RESULTS The final cohort included 120 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 62-82]). Recurrence was confirmed in 106 (88.3%) patients. Considering a PI-RR score ≥ 3 as positive for recurrence, minimum and maximum diagnostic values among the readers were as follows: sensitivity 79-86%; specificity 64-86%; positive predictive value 95-98%; negative predictive value 33-46%; accuracy 79-87%. Regardless of reader's level of experience, the inter-observer reliability resulted good or excellent (κ ranges across all readers: 0.52-0.77), and ICC was 0.8. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, baseline-PSA, and trigger-PSA resulted predictive of local recurrence at imaging. CONCLUSIONS The PI-RR system is an effective tool for MRI evaluation of PCa local recurrence and facilitates uniformity among radiologists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study confirmed the PI-RR system's good diagnostic accuracy for the MRI evaluation of PCa local recurrences. It showed high reproducibility among readers with variable experience levels, validating it as a promising standardisation tool for assessing patients with biochemical recurrence. KEY POINTS • In this retrospective study, the PI-RR system revealed promising diagnostic performances among five readers with different experience (sensitivity 79-86%; specificity 64-86%; accuracy 79-87%). • The inter-observer reliability among the five readers resulted good or excellent (κ ranges: 0.52-0.77) with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.8. • The PI-RR assessment score may facilitate standardisation and generalizability in the evaluation of prostate cancer local recurrence among radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Carretera Clara Campoamor 341, 36312, Vigo, Spain.
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sofia Frade-Santos
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Carretera Clara Campoamor 341, 36312, Vigo, Spain
- Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil (IPOLFG), Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alejandra García-Baizán
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Carretera Clara Campoamor 341, 36312, Vigo, Spain
| | - Laura Paredes-Velázquez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Carretera Clara Campoamor 341, 36312, Vigo, Spain
| | - María Aymerich
- Diagnostic Imaging Research Group, Radiology Department, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain
| | - Sandro Sironi
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - María Milagros Otero-García
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Vigo, Carretera Clara Campoamor 341, 36312, Vigo, Spain
- Diagnostic Imaging Research Group, Radiology Department, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sciarra A, Santarelli V, Salciccia S, Moriconi M, Basile G, Santodirocco L, Carino D, Frisenda M, Di Pierro G, Del Giudice F, Gentilucci A, Bevilacqua G. How the Management of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Will Be Modified by the Concept of Anticipation and Incrementation of Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:764. [PMID: 38398155 PMCID: PMC10886975 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatments for prostate cancer (PC) is an extremely heterogeneous phase and at least a stratification into low- and high-risk cases for early progression in metastatic disease is necessary. At present, PSA-DT represents the best parameter to define low- and high-risk BCR PC, but real precision medicine is strongly suggested to define tailored management for patients with BCR. Before defining management, it is necessary to exclude the presence of low-volume metastasis associated with PSA progression using new-generation imaging, preferably with PSMA PET/CT. Low-risk BCR cases should be actively observed without early systemic therapies. Early treatment of low-risk BCR with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can produce disadvantages such as the development of castration resistance before the appearance of metastases (non-metastatic castration-resistant PC). Patients with high-risk BCR benefit from early systemic therapy. Even with overall survival (OS) as the primary treatment endpoint, metastasis-free survival (MFS) should be used as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, especially in long survival stages of the disease. The EMBARK study has greatly influenced the management of high-risk BCR, by introducing the concept of anticipation and intensification through the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and ADT combination therapy. In high-risk (PSA-DT ≤ 9 months) BCR cases, the combination of enzalutamide with leuprolide significantly improves MFS when compared to leuprolide alone, maintaining an unchanged quality of life in the asymptomatic phase of the disease. The possibility of using ARSIs alone in this early disease setting is suggested by the EMBARK study (arm with enzalutamide alone) with less evidence than with the intensification of the combination therapy. Continued use versus discontinuation of enzalutamide plus leuprolide intensified therapy upon reaching undetectable PSA levels needs to be better defined with further analysis. Real-world analysis must verify the significant results obtained in the context of a phase 3 study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sciarra
- Department Materno Infantile e Scienze Urologiche, Sapienza University, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (S.S.); (M.M.); (G.B.); (L.S.); (D.C.); (M.F.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.G.); (A.G.); (G.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Roberts MJ, Conduit C, Davis ID, Effeney RM, Williams S, Martin JM, Hofman MS, Hruby G, Eapen R, Gianacas C, Papa N, Lourenço RDA, Dhillon HM, Allen R, Fontela A, Kaur B, Emmett L. The Dedicated Imaging Post-Prostatectomy for Enhanced Radiotherapy outcomes (DIPPER) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised trial of salvage radiotherapy versus surveillance for low-risk biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2024; 133 Suppl 3:39-47. [PMID: 37604702 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and surveillance for low-risk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence have competing risks and benefits. The efficacy of early SRT to the prostate bed with or without pelvic lymph nodes compared to surveillance in patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy and no identifiable recurrent disease evident on prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is unknown. STUDY DESIGN The Dedicated Imaging Post-Prostatectomy for Enhanced Radiotherapy outcomes (DIPPER) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised Phase II trial. ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint is 3-year event-free survival, with events comprising one of PSA recurrence (PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL higher than baseline), radiological evidence of metastatic disease, or initiation of systemic or other salvage treatments. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes, treatment patterns, participant perceptions, and cost-effectiveness. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible participants have PSA recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, defined by serum PSA level of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL, deemed low risk according to modified European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk criteria (International Society for Urological Pathology Grade Group ≤2, PSA doubling time >12 months), with no definite/probable recurrent prostate cancer on PSMA-PET/CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 100 participants will be recruited from five Australian centres and randomised 1:1 to SRT or surveillance. Participants will undergo 6-monthly clinical evaluation for up to 36 months. Androgen-deprivation therapy is not permissible. Enrolment commenced May 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN: ACTRN12622001478707).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
- Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Ciara Conduit
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Vic., Australia
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Rachel M Effeney
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
- Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jarad M Martin
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - George Hruby
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
- Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Chris Gianacas
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenço
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Ray Allen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Antoinette Fontela
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Baldeep Kaur
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Preisser F, Abrams-Pompe RS, Stelwagen PJ, Böhmer D, Zattoni F, Magli A, Rivas JG, Dilme RV, Sepulcri M, Eguibar A, Heidegger I, Arnold C, Fankhauser CD, Chun FKH, van der Poel H, Gandaglia G, Wiegel T, van den Bergh RCN, Tilki D. European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Classification as a Decision Tool for Salvage Radiotherapy-A Multicenter Study. Eur Urol 2024; 85:164-170. [PMID: 37355358 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE To assess whether this risk stratification helps in choosing patients for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Analyses of 2379 patients who developed BCR after RP (1989-2020), within ten European high-volume centers, were conducted. Early and late SRT were defined as SRT delivered at prostate-specific antigen values <0.5 and ≥0.5 ng/ml, respectively. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable Cox models tested the effect of SRT versus no SRT on death and cancer-specific death. The Simon-Makuch method tested for survival differences within each risk group. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 805 and 1574 patients were classified as having EAU low- and high-risk BCR. The median follow-up was 54 mo after BCR for survivors. For low-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 87% versus 78% (p = 0.2) and cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96% (p = 0.2) for early versus no SRT. For high-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 81% versus 66% (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival was 98% versus 82% (p < 0.001) for early versus no SRT. In multivariable analyses, early SRT decreased the risk for death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR: 0.08, p < 0.001). Late SRT was a predictor of cancer-specific death (HR: 0.17, p < 0.01) but not death (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Improved survival was recorded within the high-risk BCR group for patients treated with early SRT compared with those under observation. Our results suggest recommending early SRT for high-risk BCR men. Conversely, surveillance might be suitable for low-risk BCR, since only nine patients with low-risk BCR died from prostate cancer during follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY The impact of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) on cancer-specific outcomes stratified according to the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk classification was assessed. While men with high-risk BCR should be offered SRT, surveillance might be a suitable option for those with low-risk BCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Preisser
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Raisa S Abrams-Pompe
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Piter Jan Stelwagen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, ASUIUD, Udine, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital San Martino, Belluno, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Aritz Eguibar
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christoph Arnold
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Felix K-H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Falagario UG, Martini A, Pellegrino F, Carrieri G, Manon M, Lantz A, Wiklund P. Re: Derya Tilki, Ming-Hui Chen, Jing Wu, et al. Prostate-specific Antigen Level at the Time of Salvage Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2428-35. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:167-168. [PMID: 37271672 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Mani Manon
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Departments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stensland KD, Caram MEV, Herr DJ, Burns JA, Sparks JB, Elliott DA, Shin C, Morgan TM, Zaslavsky A, Hollenbeck BK, Tsodikov A, Skolarus TA. National Long-term Survival Estimates After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Urology 2024; 184:135-141. [PMID: 37951360 PMCID: PMC11229680 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine survival and disease control outcomes, including metastasis-related survival outcomes, in a large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of men with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy from 2005 to 2015 with follow-up through 2019 in the Veterans Health Administration. We defined biochemical recurrence (BCR) as a prostate-specific antigen ≥0.2 ng/mL. We used a validated natural language processing encoded dataset to identify incident metastatic prostate cancer. We estimated overall survival from time of surgery, time of BCR, and time of first metastasis using the Kaplan-Meier method. We then estimated time from surgery to BCR, BCR to metastatic disease, and prostate-cancer-specific survival from various time points using cumulative incidence considering competing risk of death. RESULTS Of 21,992 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, we identified 5951 (27%) who developed BCR. Of men with BCR, 677 (11%) developed metastases. We estimated the 10-year cumulative incidence of BCR and metastases after BCR were 28% and 20%, respectively. Median overall survival after BCR was 14years, with 10-year survival of 70%. From the time of metastasis, median overall survival approached 7years, with 10-year overall survival of 34%. Prostate cancer-specific survival for the entire cohort at 10years was 94%. CONCLUSION In this large contemporary national cohort, survival for men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer is longer than historical cohorts. When counseling patients and designing clinical studies, these updated estimates may serve as more reliable reflections of current outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan E V Caram
- HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniel J Herr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer A Burns
- HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jordan B Sparks
- HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - David A Elliott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chris Shin
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | - Ted A Skolarus
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhong Q, Sun R, Aref AT, Noor Z, Anees A, Zhu Y, Lucas N, Poulos RC, Lyu M, Zhu T, Chen GB, Wang Y, Ding X, Rutishauser D, Rupp NJ, Rueschoff JH, Poyet C, Hermanns T, Fankhauser C, Rodríguez Martínez M, Shao W, Buljan M, Neumann JF, Beyer A, Hains PG, Reddel RR, Robinson PJ, Aebersold R, Guo T, Wild PJ. Proteomic-based stratification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Life Sci Alliance 2024; 7:e202302146. [PMID: 38052461 PMCID: PMC10698198 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202302146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gleason grading is an important prognostic indicator for prostate adenocarcinoma and is crucial for patient treatment decisions. However, intermediate-risk patients diagnosed in the Gleason grade group (GG) 2 and GG3 can harbour either aggressive or non-aggressive disease, resulting in under- or overtreatment of a significant number of patients. Here, we performed proteomic, differential expression, machine learning, and survival analyses for 1,348 matched tumour and benign sample runs from 278 patients. Three proteins (F5, TMEM126B, and EARS2) were identified as candidate biomarkers in patients with biochemical recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression yielded 18 proteins, from which a risk score was constructed to dichotomize prostate cancer patients into low- and high-risk groups. This 18-protein signature is prognostic for the risk of biochemical recurrence and completely independent of the intermediate GG. Our results suggest that markers generated by computational proteomic profiling have the potential for clinical applications including integration into prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhong
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Rui Sun
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Adel T Aref
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Zainab Noor
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Asim Anees
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Yi Zhu
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Natasha Lucas
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Rebecca C Poulos
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Mengge Lyu
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tiansheng Zhu
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Bo Chen
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Clinical Research Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingrui Wang
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuan Ding
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dorothea Rutishauser
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jan H Rueschoff
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Wenguang Shao
- State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Marija Buljan
- Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Peter G Hains
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Roger R Reddel
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Phillip J Robinson
- https://ror.org/01bsaey45 ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Tiannan Guo
- https://ror.org/05hfa4n20 iMarker Lab, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peter J Wild
- Goethe University Frankfurt, Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ling J, Gu R, Liu L, Chu R, Wu J, Zhong R, Ye S, Liu J, Fan S. Versatile Design of Organic Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photodynamic Therapy of Prostate Cancer. ACS MATERIALS AU 2024; 4:14-29. [PMID: 38221923 PMCID: PMC10786136 DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy is a primary treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PCa), although high rates of recurrence are commonly observed postsurgery. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has demonstrated efficacy in treating nonmetastatic localized PCa with a low incidence of adverse events. However, its limited efficacy remains a concern. To address these issues, various organic polymeric nanoparticles (OPNPs) loaded with photosensitizers (PSs) that target prostate cancer have been developed. However, further optimization of the OPNP design is necessary to maximize the effectiveness of PDT and improve its clinical applicability. This Review provides an overview of the design, preparation, methodology, and oncological aspects of OPNP-based PDT for the treatment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiacheng Ling
- Department
of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital
of Anhui Medical University, Institute of Urology & Anhui Province
Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, China
| | - Rongrong Gu
- College
of Science & School of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China
| | - Lulu Liu
- School
of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural
University, 130 Changjiang
West Road, Hefei 230036, China
| | - Ruixi Chu
- College
of Science & School of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China
| | - Junchao Wu
- Department
of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital
of Anhui Medical University, Institute of Urology & Anhui Province
Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, China
| | - Rongfang Zhong
- Department
of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital
of Anhui Medical University, Institute of Urology & Anhui Province
Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, China
| | - Sheng Ye
- College
of Science & School of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 Changjiang West Road, Hefei 230036, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Inner
Mongolia University Hohhot, Inner
Mongolia 010021, China
- Dalian
Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 457 Zhongshan Road, Dalian 116023, China
- DICP-Surrey
Joint Centre for Future Materials, Department of Chemical and Process
Engineering and Advanced Technology Institute, University of Surrey, Guilford,
Surrey GU27XH, U.K.
| | - Song Fan
- Department
of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital
of Anhui Medical University, Institute of Urology & Anhui Province
Key Laboratory of Genitourinary Diseases, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang J, Wu W, Yuan T, Wang L, Zang L, Liu Q, Wang L, Huo X, Huo B, Tang Y, Wang H, Zhao Z. Tumor-associated macrophages and PD-L1 in prostate cancer: a possible key to unlocking immunotherapy efficacy. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:445-465. [PMID: 38189834 PMCID: PMC10817380 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) is often considered as a "cold" tumor with low responsiveness to immunotherapy. Recent evidence suggests the activation of specific immune cells, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), could potentially influence the efficacy of immunotherapy in PCa. However, the relationship between TAMs and PD-L1, a significant regulator in immunotherapy, within PCa remains unexplored. METHODS In this study, we assessed TAM infiltration and PD-L1 expression levels in a local cohort of 95 PCa tissue samples and two publicly available PCa datasets. We employed a combination of bioinformatics and experimental techniques, including gene set enrichment analysis, CIBERSORTx, tissue microarray, immunohistochemistry staining, and analysis of single-cell sequencing datasets, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the association between PD-L1 and TAMs in the PCa microenvironment. RESULTS The study showed that CD68+ TAMs and CD163+ TAMs (M2-TAMs) were more abundant in the tumor microenvironment than in non-cancerous surrounding tissues. The infiltration of CD163+ TAMs was significantly associated with the Gleason score and risk stratification of PCa. Importantly, elevated PD-L1 expression correlated significantly with high infiltration of CD163+ TAMs. Furthermore, patients displaying high levels of CD163+ TAMs and PD-L1 expression exhibited shorter times to biochemical recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that CD163+ TAMs are closely associated with PD-L1 expression and can act as a valuable prognostic indicator for PCa. The high infiltration of M2-TAMs, coupled with the overexpression of PD-L1, may contribute to immune escape mechanisms in PCa, thereby influencing disease prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhuan Wang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Wenqi Wu
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Tian Yuan
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Lili Wang
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Li Zang
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Xiaodong Huo
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Bin Huo
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Yong Tang
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Haitao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Zhigang Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300192, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Efstathiou JA, Morgans AK, Bland CS, Shore ND. Novel hormone therapy and coordination of care in high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102630. [PMID: 38035646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing primary definitive treatment. Patients with high-risk BCR have an increased risk of metastatic progression and subsequent PCa-specific mortality, and thus could benefit from treatment intensification. Given the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, multidisciplinary care (MDC) can play a crucial role in the individualized management of this patient population. This review explores the role for MDC when evaluating the clinical evidence for the evolving definition of high-risk BCR and the emerging therapeutic strategies, especially with novel hormone therapies (NHTs), for patients with either high-risk BCR or oligometastatic PCa. Clinical studies have used different characteristics to define high-risk BCR and there is no consensus regarding the definition of high-risk BCR nor for management strategies. Next-generation imaging and multigene panels offer potential enhanced patient identification and precision-based decision-making, respectively. Treatment intensification with NHTs, either alone or combined with radiotherapy or metastasis-directed therapy, has been promising in clinical trials in patients with high-risk BCR or oligometastases. As novel risk-stratification and treatment options as well as evidence-based literature evolve, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary team to identify patients with high-risk features at an earlier stage, and make informed decisions on the treatments that could optimize their care and long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, MDC data are scarce in the BCR or oligometastatic setting. Efforts to integrate MDC into the standard management of this patient population are needed, and will likely improve outcomes across this heterogeneous PCa patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 850 Brookline Ave, Dana 09-930, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Christopher S Bland
- US Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., 66 Hudson Boulevard, Hudson Yards, Manhattan, New York, NY 10001, USA.
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, GenesisCare US, 823 82nd Pkwy, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Light A, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra AV, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore CM, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: An Analysis from the FORECAST Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 85:35-46. [PMID: 37778954 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy is unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate MRI and MRI-targeted biopsies for detecting intraprostatic cancer recurrence and planning for salvage focal ablation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS FOcal RECurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment (FORECAST; NCT01883128) was a prospective cohort diagnostic study that recruited 181 patients with suspected radiorecurrence at six UK centres (2014 to 2018); 144 were included here. INTERVENTION All patients underwent MRI with 5 mm transperineal template mapping biopsies; 84 had additional MRI-targeted biopsies. MRI scans with Likert scores of 3 to 5 were deemed suspicious. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS First, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI was calculated. Second, the pathological characteristics of MRI-detected and MRI-undetected tumours were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test for trend. Third, four biopsy strategies involving an MRI-targeted biopsy alone and with systematic biopsies of one to two other quadrants were studied. Fisher's exact test was used to compare MRI-targeted biopsy alone with the best other strategy for the number of patients with missed cancer and the number of patients with cancer harbouring additional tumours in unsampled quadrants. Analyses focused primarily on detecting cancer of any grade or length. Last, eligibility for focal therapy was evaluated for men with localised (≤T3bN0M0) radiorecurrent disease. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 144 patients, 111 (77%) had cancer detected on biopsy. MRI sensitivity and specificity at the patient level were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 0.99) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.35), respectively. At the prostate quadrant level, 258/576 (45%) quadrants had cancer detected on biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.66 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.73) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.62), respectively. At the quadrant level, compared with MRI-undetected tumours, MRI-detected tumours had longer maximum cancer core length (median difference 3 mm [7 vs 4 mm]; 95% CI 1 to 4 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher grade group (p = 0.002). Of the 84 men who also underwent an MRI-targeted biopsy, 73 (87%) had recurrent cancer diagnosed. Performing an MRI-targeted biopsy alone missed cancer in 5/73 patients (7%; 95% CI 3 to 15%); with additional systematic sampling of the other ipsilateral and contralateral posterior quadrants (strategy 4), 2/73 patients (3%; 95% CI 0 to 10%) would have had cancer missed (difference 4%; 95% CI -3 to 11%, p = 0.4). If an MRI-targeted biopsy alone was performed, 43/73 (59%; 95% CI 47 to 69%) patients with cancer would have harboured undetected additional tumours in unsampled quadrants. This reduced but only to 7/73 patients (10%; 95% CI 4 to 19%) with strategy 4 (difference 49%; 95% CI 36 to 62%, p < 0.0001). Of 73 patients, 43 (59%; 95% CI 47 to 69%) had localised radiorecurrent cancer suitable for a form of focal ablation. CONCLUSIONS For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy, MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy, with or without perilesional sampling, will diagnose cancer in the majority where present. MRI-undetected cancers, defined as Likert scores of 1 to 2, were found to be smaller and of lower grade. However, if salvage focal ablation is planned, an MRI-targeted biopsy alone is insufficient for prostate mapping; approximately three of five patients with recurrent cancer found on an MRI-targeted biopsy alone harboured further tumours in unsampled quadrants. Systematic sampling of the whole gland should be considered in addition to an MRI-targeted biopsy to capture both MRI-detected and MRI-undetected disease. PATIENT SUMMARY After radiotherapy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accurate for detecting recurrent prostate cancer, with missed cancer being smaller and of lower grade. Targeting a biopsy to suspicious areas on MRI results in a diagnosis of cancer in most patients. However, for every five men who have recurrent cancer, this targeted approach would miss cancers elsewhere in the prostate in three of these men. If further focal treatment of the prostate is planned, random biopsies covering the whole prostate in addition to targeted biopsies should be considered so that tumours are not missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Light
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Abi Kanthabalan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marjorie Otieno
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Menelaos Pavlou
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rumana Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Norman R Williams
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amr Emara
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Arash Latifoltojar
- Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Harbir Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clement Orczyk
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashok Nikapota
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anita V Mitra
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Panunzio A, Gallina S, Tafuri A, Serafin E, Orlando R, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D’Aietti D, Montanaro F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, Artoni F, Baielli A, Ditonno F, Rizzetto R, Veccia A, Gozzo A, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The impact of prognostic group classification on prostate cancer progression in intermediate-risk patients according to the European Association of Urology system: results in 479 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center. Ther Adv Urol 2024; 16:17562872241229260. [PMID: 38348129 PMCID: PMC10860426 DOI: 10.1177/17562872241229260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may be impaired by adverse pathology misclassification including tumor upgrading and upstaging. Clinical predictors of disease progression need to be improved in this category of patients. Objectives To identify PCa prognostic factors to define prognostic groups in intermediate-risk patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design Data from 1143 patients undergoing RARP from January 2013 to October 2020 were collected: 901 subjects had available follow-up, of whom 479 were at intermediate risk. Methods PCa progression was defined as biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Study endpoints were evaluated by statistical methods including Cox's proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meyer survival curves, and binomial and multinomial logistic regression models. Results After a median (interquartile range) of 35 months (15-57 months), 84 patients (17.5%) had disease progression, which was independently predicted by the percentage of biopsy-positive cores ⩾ 50% and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 3 for clinical factors and by ISUP > 2, positive surgical margins and pelvic lymph node invasion for pathological features. Patients were classified into clinical and pathological groups as favorable, unfavorable (one prognostic factor), and adverse (more than one prognostic factor). The risk of PCa progression increased with worsening prognosis through groups. A significant positive association was found between the two groups; consequently, as clinical prognosis worsened, the risk of detecting unfavorable and adverse pathological prognostic clusters increased in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Conclusion The study identified factors predicting disease progression that allowed the computation of highly correlated prognostic groups. As the prognosis worsened, the risk of PCa progression increased. Intermediate-risk PCa needs more prognostic stratification for appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D’Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koehler D, Trappe S, Shenas F, Karimzadeh A, Apostolova I, Klutmann S, Ambrosini F, Budäus L, Falkenbach F, Knipper S, Maurer T. Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided surgery with negative histopathology: an in-depth analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:548-557. [PMID: 37750908 PMCID: PMC10774205 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06442-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify reasons for negative histopathology of specimens from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) in recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after prostatectomy. METHODS Of 302 patients who underwent PSMA-RGS, 17 (5.6%) demonstrated a negative histopathology. Preoperative data, PSMA PET, PSMA SPECT, and follow-up information were analyzed retrospectively to differentiate true/false positive (TP/FP) from true/false negative (TN/FN) lesions. RESULTS The median prostate-specific antigen at PET was 0.4 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.3-1.2). Twenty-five index lesions (median short axis 7 mm, IQR 5-8; median long-axis 12 mm, IQR 8-17) had a median SUVmax of 4 (IQR 2.6-6; median PSMA expression score 1, IQR 1-1). Six lesions were TP, twelve were FP, one was TN, and six remained unclear. All TP lesions were in the prostatic fossa or adjacent to the internal iliac arteries. Three suspected local recurrences were FP. All FP lymph nodes were located at the distal external iliac arteries or outside the pelvis. A low PSMA-expressing TN node was identified next to a common iliac artery. Unclear lesions were located next to the external iliac arteries or outside the pelvis. CONCLUSION In most cases with a negative histopathology from PSMA-RGS, lesions were FP on PSMA PET. Unspecific uptake should be considered in low PSMA-expressing lymph nodes at the distal external iliac arteries or outside the pelvis, especially if no PSMA-positive lymph nodes closer to the prostatic fossa are evident. Rarely, true positive metastases were missed by surgery or histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Koehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Samuel Trappe
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Farzad Shenas
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amir Karimzadeh
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Klutmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesca Ambrosini
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Adams ES, Deivasigamani S, Mottaghi M, Huang J, Gupta RT, Polascik TJ. Evaluation of Recurrent Disease after Radiation Therapy for Patients Considering Local Salvage Therapy: Past vs. Contemporary Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5883. [PMID: 38136427 PMCID: PMC10741753 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Adams
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Mahdi Mottaghi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Rajan T. Gupta
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas J. Polascik
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sushentsev N, Hamm G, Richings J, McLean MA, Menih IH, Ayyappan V, Mills IG, Warren AY, Gnanapragasam VJ, Barry ST, Goodwin RJA, Gallagher FA, Barrett T. Imaging tumor lactate is feasible for identifying intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with postsurgical biochemical recurrence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2312261120. [PMID: 38011568 PMCID: PMC10710070 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2312261120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
While radical prostatectomy remains the mainstay of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, 20 to 40% of patients develop postsurgical biochemical recurrence (BCR). A particularly challenging clinical cohort includes patients with intermediate-risk disease whose risk stratification would benefit from advanced approaches that complement standard-of-care diagnostic tools. Here, we show that imaging tumor lactate using hyperpolarized 13C MRI and spatial metabolomics identifies BCR-positive patients in two prospective intermediate-risk surgical cohorts. Supported by spatially resolved tissue analysis of established glycolytic biomarkers, this study provides the rationale for multicenter trials of tumor metabolic imaging as an auxiliary tool to support PCa treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Sushentsev
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Hamm
- Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Research & Development, AstraZeneca, CambridgeCB2 0AA, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Richings
- Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Research & Development, AstraZeneca, CambridgeCB2 0AA, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A. McLean
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Horvat Menih
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vinay Ayyappan
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian G. Mills
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Genito-Urinary and Prostate Focus Group, Queen’s University Belfast, BelfastBT9 7AE, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, OxfordOX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen5021, Norway
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent J. Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, CambridgeCB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, CambridgeCB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon T. Barry
- Bioscience, Discovery, Oncology Research & Development, AstraZeneca, CambridgeCB20AA, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J. A. Goodwin
- Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Research & Development, AstraZeneca, CambridgeCB2 0AA, United Kingdom
| | - Ferdia A. Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, CB2 0QQCambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Freedland SJ, Gleave M, De Giorgi U, Rannikko A, Pieczonka CM, Tutrone RF, Venugopal B, Woo HH, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Supiot S, Lantz A, Ganguli A, Ivanova J, Kral P, Huang SP, Saad F, Shore ND. Enzalutamide and Quality of Life in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. NEJM EVIDENCE 2023; 2:EVIDoa2300251. [PMID: 38320501 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2300251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: EMBARK, a controlled trial reported elsewhere, showed enzalutamide plus leuprolide (combination) and enzalutamide monotherapy prolonged metastasis-free survival versus placebo plus leuprolide (alone) in patients with high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Health-related quality of life was also analyzed but not reported. METHODS: In EMBARK, patients with biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤9 months) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to combination (n=355), leuprolide-alone (n=358), or enzalutamide monotherapy (n=355). In this article we provide the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from EMBARK at baseline and every 12 weeks until metastasis or death. The key end point was time to first and confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration (TTFD/TTCD) in pain and health-related quality of life using four PRO measures and predefined thresholds. RESULTS: At baseline, all groups had high health-related quality of life. For worst pain, the median TTFD was 19.35 months with leuprolide alone, 13.93 months with combination (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.30) and 16.59 months with monotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.31). The median TTCD was 66.27 months with leuprolide alone, 80.00 months with combination (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04), and 60.91 months with monotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.28). For Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate total score, the median TTFD was 11.10 months with leuprolide alone, 8.31 months with combination (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.36), and 8.38 months with monotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.39). The median TTCD was 36.53 months with leuprolide alone, 38.77 months with combination (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.28), and 30.55 months with monotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: The PROs from EMBARK show that both enzalutamide combination and monotherapy versus leuprolide alone, with oncologic benefits noted above, preserved high health-related quality of life in patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. (Funded by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02319837.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Freedland
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
- Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - Martin Gleave
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Antti Rannikko
- Department of Urology and Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
- Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki
| | | | | | - Balaji Venugopal
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Center, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Henry H Woo
- SAN Prostate Center of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | | | - Stephane Supiot
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Rene Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Anna Lantz
- Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Shu-Pin Huang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center/GenesisCare US, Myrtle Beach, SC
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Guerra A, Alves FC, Maes K, Maio R, Villeirs G, Mouriño H. Risk Biomarkers for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Using Clinical and MRI-Derived Semantic Features. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5296. [PMID: 37958468 PMCID: PMC10650512 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the impact of the covariates derived from a predictive model for detecting extracapsular extension on pathology (pECE+) on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) within 4 years after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS Retrospective data analysis was conducted from a single center between 2015 and 2022. Variables under consideration included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, patient age, prostate volume, MRI semantic features, and Grade Group (GG). We also assessed the influence of pECE+ and positive surgical margins on BCRFS. To attain these goals, we used the Kaplan-Meier survival function and the multivariable Cox regression model. Additionally, we analyzed the MRI features on BCR (biochemical recurrence) in low/intermediate risk patients. RESULTS A total of 177 participants with a follow-up exceeding 6 months post-RARP were included. The 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year risks of BCR after radical prostatectomy were 5%, 13%, and 21%, respectively. The non-parametric approach for the survival analysis showed that adverse MRI features such as macroscopic ECE on MRI (mECE+), capsular disruption, high tumor capsular contact length (TCCL), GG ≥ 4, positive surgical margins (PSM), and pECE+ on pathology were risk factors for BCR. In low/intermediate-risk patients (pECE- and GG < 4), the presence of adverse MRI features has been shown to increase the risk of BCR. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the importance of incorporating predictive MRI features for detecting extracapsular extension pre-surgery in influencing early outcomes and clinical decision making; mECE+, TCCL, capsular disruption, and GG ≥ 4 based on pre-surgical biopsy were independent prognostic factors for early BCR. The presence of adverse features on MRI can assist in identifying low/intermediate-risk patients who will benefit from closer monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adalgisa Guerra
- Department of Radiology, Hospital da Luz Lisbon, 1500-650 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Filipe Caseiro Alves
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Research CIBIT/ICNAS, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Kris Maes
- Department of Urology, Hospital da Luz Lisbon, 1500-650 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Rui Maio
- Department of Radiology, Hospital da Luz Lisbon, 1500-650 Lisboa, Portugal;
- Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| | - Helena Mouriño
- CEAUL, Centro de Estatística e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal;
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhu W, Zeng H, Huang J, Wu J, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang H, Luo Y, Lai W. Integrated machine learning identifies epithelial cell marker genes for improving outcomes and immunotherapy in prostate cancer. J Transl Med 2023; 21:782. [PMID: 37925432 PMCID: PMC10625713 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04633-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa), a globally prevalent malignancy, displays intricate heterogeneity within its epithelial cells, closely linked with disease progression and immune modulation. However, the clinical significance of genes and biomarkers associated with these cells remains inadequately explored. To address this gap, this study aimed to comprehensively investigate the roles and clinical value of epithelial cell-related genes in PCa. METHODS Leveraging single-cell sequencing data from GSE176031, we conducted an extensive analysis to identify epithelial cell marker genes (ECMGs). Employing consensus clustering analysis, we evaluated the correlations between ECMGs, prognosis, and immune responses in PCa. Subsequently, we developed and validated an optimal prognostic signature, termed the epithelial cell marker gene prognostic signature (ECMGPS), through synergistic analysis from 101 models employing 10 machine learning algorithms across five independent cohorts. Additionally, we collected clinical features and previously published signatures from the literature for comparative analysis. Furthermore, we explored the clinical utility of ECMGPS in immunotherapy and drug selection using multi-omics analysis and the IMvigor cohort. Finally, we investigated the biological functions of the hub gene, transmembrane p24 trafficking protein 3 (TMED3), in PCa using public databases and experiments. RESULTS We identified a comprehensive set of 543 ECMGs and established a strong correlation between ECMGs and both the prognostic evaluation and immune classification in PCa. Notably, ECMGPS exhibited robust predictive capability, surpassing traditional clinical features and 80 published signatures in terms of both independence and accuracy across five cohorts. Significantly, ECMGPS demonstrated significant promise in identifying potential PCa patients who might benefit from immunotherapy and personalized medicine, thereby moving us nearer to tailored therapeutic approaches for individuals. Moreover, the role of TMED3 in promoting malignant proliferation of PCa cells was validated. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight ECMGPS as a powerful tool for improving PCa patient outcomes and supply a robust conceptual framework for in-depth examination of PCa complexities. Simultaneously, our study has the potential to develop a novel alternative for PCa diagnosis and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weian Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Hengda Zeng
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiongduan Huang
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianjie Wu
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Ziqiao Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Luo
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wenjie Lai
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China.
- Laboratory of Biomaterials and Translational Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ah-Thiane L, Sargos P, Chapet O, Jolicoeur M, Terlizzi M, Salembier C, Boustani J, Prevost C, Gaudioz S, Derashodian T, Palumbo S, De Hertogh O, Créhange G, Zilli T, Supiot S. Managing postoperative biochemical relapse in prostate cancer, from the perspective of the Francophone group of Urological radiotherapy (GFRU). Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102626. [PMID: 37734178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients treated with radical surgery for localized prostate cancer may experience biochemical recurrence that requires appropriate management. Definitions of biochemical relapse may vary, but, in all cases, consist of an increase in a PSA without clinical or radiological signs of disease. Molecular imaging through to positron emission tomography has taken a preponderant place in relapse diagnosis, progressively replacing bone scan and CT-scan. Prostate bed radiotherapy is currently a key treatment, the action of which should be potentiated by androgen deprivation therapy. Nowadays perspectives consist in determining the best combination therapies, particularly thanks to next-generation hormone therapies, but not exclusively. Several trials are ongoing and should address these issues. We present here a literature review aiming to discuss the current management of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer after radical surgery, in lights of recent findings, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charles Le Moyne Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Célia Prevost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sonya Gaudioz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU UCL Namur-Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Aparicio A. Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer - Tilting the Scale. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1522-1523. [PMID: 37851879 DOI: 10.1056/nejme2309502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Aparicio
- From the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Manenti G, Nezzo M, Ryan CP, Fraioli FR, Carreri B, Gigliotti PE, Angeloni C, Di Pietro F, De Angeli M, Perretta T, D'Angelillo RM, Garaci FG. Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) with ultrasound/MRI fusion guidance in the treatment of localized radiotherapy-resistant prostate cancer. BJR Open 2023; 5:20230042. [PMID: 37942495 PMCID: PMC10630978 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20230042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) guided by ultrasound/magnetic resonance (MR) fusion as a salvage treatment for refractory focal prostate cancer. Methods A total of five patients who had undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate carcinoma and biochemical recurrence, confirmed by both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and MRI (3T mpMRI), were enrolled in this study. Focal ablation was performed using a 1064 nm diode laser. Post-ablation follow-up was conducted for a duration of 18 months, which included regular PSA sampling, 3T mpMRI, and ultrasound/MR fusion-guided biopsies systematic and targeted at the site of the focal treatment. Results The focal ablation procedure was carried out in an outpatient setting regimen with optimal clinical and biochemical outcomes. No recurrence was detected throughout the follow-up period. Conclusion TPLA focal treatment effectively manages local recurrences of RT refractory prostate cancer without side-effects or complications. Preservation of quality of life and functional outcomes, along with a >70% reduction in PSA, were achieved. Advances in knowledge Our study investigated TPLA as a salvage treatment for low-risk recurrent prostate cancer after RT, demonstrating its tolerability, feasibility, and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Nezzo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Federico Romeo Fraioli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Carreri
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Elda Gigliotti
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Angeloni
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Di Pietro
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina De Angeli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perretta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|