Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging: A Game Changer in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Planning

Prediction of T staging in PI-RADS 4-5 prostate cancer by combination of multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

BACKGROUND

In this study, we explored the diagnostic performances of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and combination of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI (mpMRI + PET/CT) for extracapsular extension (ECE). Based on the analyses above, we tested the feasibility of using mpMRI + PET/CT results to predict T staging in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

By enrolling 75 patients of prostate cancer with mpMRI and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before radical prostatectomy, we analyzed the detection performances of ECE in mpMRI, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI + PET/CT on their lesion images matched with their pathological sample images layer by layer through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. By inputting the lesion data into Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), we divided the lesions into different PI-RADS scores. The improvement of detecting ECE was analyzed by net reclassification improvement (NRI). The predictors for T staging were evaluated by using univariate and multivariable analysis. The Kappa test was used to evaluate the prediction ability.

RESULTS

One hundred three regions of lesion were identified from 75 patients. 50 of 103 regions were positive for ECE. The ECE diagnosis AUC of mpMRI + PET/CT is higher than that of mpMRI alone (ΔAUC = 0.101; 95% CI, 0.0148 to 0.1860; p < 0.05, respectively). Compared to mpMRI, mpMRI + PET/CT has a significant improvement in detecting ECE in PI-RADS 4-5 (NRI 36.1%, p < 0.01). The diagnosis power of mpMRI + PET/CT was an independent predictor for T staging (p < 0.001) in logistic regression analysis. In patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, 40 of 46 (87.0%) patients have correct T staging prediction from mpMRI + PET/CT (κ 0.70, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The prediction of T staging in PI-RADS 4-5 prostate cancer patients by mpMRI + PET/CT had a quite good performance.

Standardised Uptake Values as Determined on PSMA PET/CT is associated with Oncological Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients

Objectives

To investigate the association between intraprostatic, intratumoral maximum standardised uptake values (SUV_max) on prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and pathology outcomes, including pathological International Society of Urological Pathology score (pISUP) and lymph node (LN) status (pN0/pN1).

Patients and Methods

A bi‐centric, secondary analysis of two previous, prospective cohort studies was performed in 318 patients with biopsy confirmed PCa and who were scheduled for RARP. Before surgery, patients received a PSMA PET/CT with either ⁶⁸Ga‐PSMA‐11 (59% of the patients) or ¹⁸F‐PSMA (DCFPyL; 41%) as radiotracer. PET/CT images were analysed both visually and semi‐quantitatively by measuring the SUV_max of the most intense suspect lesion in the prostate. The association between the SUV_max of the primary tumour and pre‐ and postoperative variables was analysed.

Results

The SUV_max was associated with clinical and biopsy preoperative variables, as well as with pISUP score and pathological tumour stage. Patients with a pISUP of ≤2 showed significantly lower SUV_max compared to patients with a pISUP of >2 for both tracers (SUV_max¹⁸F‐PSMA: median 5.1 vs 9.6, P = 0.002; SUV_max⁶⁸Ga‐PSMA‐11: 6.6 vs 8.6, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with pN1 had significantly higher median SUV_max than those with pN0/pNx for both tracers (SUV_max¹⁸F‐PSMA: 7.9 vs 12.3, P = 0.04; SUV_max⁶⁸Ga‐PSMA‐11: 7.6 vs 12.0, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the intraprostatic SUV_max was an independent predictor of pN1 for both ⁶⁸Ga‐PSMA‐11 (per doubling: odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–3.01)) and ¹⁸F‐PSMA (per doubling: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06–3.03).

Conclusion

Intraprostatic, intratumoral PSMA intensity on PET/CT, as semi‐quantitatively expressed by SUV_max, may be a valuable innovative biomarker in patients with localised PCa, as it is highly associated with known conventional prognostic factors, such as pISUP and LN status.

SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden

In prostate cancer (PCa) patients, the tumor-to-blood ratio (TBR) has been validated as the preferred simplified method for lesional ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (a radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) uptake quantification on PET. In contrast to SUVs, the TBR accounts for variability in arterial input functions caused by differences in total tumor burden between patients (the sink effect). However, TBR depends strongly on tracer uptake interval and has worse repeatability and is less applicable in clinical practice than SUVs. We investigated whether SUV could provide adequate quantification of ¹⁸F-DCFPyL uptake on PET/CT in a patient cohort with low PCa burden. Methods: In total, 116 patients with PCa undergoing ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging were retrospectively included. All ¹⁸F-DCFPyL-avid lesions suspected of being PCa were semiautomatically delineated. SUV_peak was plotted against TBR for the most intense lesion of each patient. The correlation of SUV_peak and TBR was evaluated using linear regression and was stratified for patients undergoing PET/CT for primary staging, patients undergoing restaging at biochemical recurrence, and patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Moreover, the correlation was evaluated as a function of tracer uptake time, prostate-specific antigen level, and PET-positive tumor volume. Results: In total, 436 lesions were delineated (median, 1 per patient; range, 1-66). SUV_peak correlated well with TBR in patients with PCa and a total tumor volume of less than 200 cm³ (R ² = 0.931). The correlation between SUV and TBR was not affected by disease setting, prostate-specific antigen level, or tumor volume. SUV_peak depended less on tracer uptake time than did TBR. Conclusion: For ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT, SUV_peak correlates strongly with TBR. Therefore, it is a valuable simplified, semiquantitative measurement in patients with low-volume PCa (<200 cm³). SUV_peak can therefore be applied in ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET assessment as an imaging biomarker to characterize tumors and to monitor treatment outcomes.

Determining the diagnostic value of PSMA-PET/CT imaging in patients with persistent high prostate specific antigen levels and negative prostate biopsies

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membranous antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to localize primary prostate cancer (PCa) in men with persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous prostate biopsies that were negative for PCa.

METHODS

In this study, 34 men with persistently elevated PSA-levels, previous negative for PCa biopsies and who subsequently underwent diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Men were divided into 3 groups: 1. 12 men with a previous negative mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 1-2) 2. 17 men with a positive mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 3-5), but negative MRI-targeted biopsies and 3. Four men in whom mpMRI was contraindicated. If PSMA-avid lesions were seen, patients underwent 2-4 cognitive targeted biopsies in combination with systematic biopsies. The detection rate of PSMA-PET/CT for PCa, and the accuracy of (possible) targeted biopsies were calculated.

RESULTS

Included men had a median PSA-level of 22.8 ng/mL (Interquartile Range 15.6-30.0) at the time of PSMA-PET/CT. Elevated PSMA-ligand uptake in the prostate suspicious for PCa was observed in 22/34 patients (64.7%). In 18/22 patients (54.5%), PSMA-targeted prostate biopsies were performed. In 3/18 patients (16.6%), the targeted biopsies showed International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score 1-2 PCa. The other men had inflammation or benign findings after histopathological examination of the biopsy cores.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the clinical value of PSMA-PET/CT for patients with an elevated PSA-level, and negative for PCa biopsies was low. Only very few men were diagnosed with PCa, and no clinically significant PCa was found.

PSMA-Based Theranostics: A Step-by-Step Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Therapy for mCRPC Patients

To date, several papers have been published about prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This paper mainly provides information for nuclear medicine physicians that are clinically engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer patients. It aims to present the utility of PSMA imaging and therapy in a step-by-step practical approach; thus, it does not discuss radiochemistry and the molecular basics of PSMA.