1
|
Bodar YJL, Koene BPF, Jansen BHE, Cysouw MCF, Meijer D, Hendrikse NH, Vis AN, Boellaard R, Oprea-Lager DE. SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1264-1269. [PMID: 33509971 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In prostate cancer (PCa) patients, the tumor-to-blood ratio (TBR) has been validated as the preferred simplified method for lesional 18F-DCFPyL (a radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand) uptake quantification on PET. In contrast to SUVs, the TBR accounts for variability in arterial input functions caused by differences in total tumor burden between patients (the sink effect). However, TBR depends strongly on tracer uptake interval and has worse repeatability and is less applicable in clinical practice than SUVs. We investigated whether SUV could provide adequate quantification of 18F-DCFPyL uptake on PET/CT in a patient cohort with low PCa burden. Methods: In total, 116 patients with PCa undergoing 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging were retrospectively included. All 18F-DCFPyL-avid lesions suspected of being PCa were semiautomatically delineated. SUVpeak was plotted against TBR for the most intense lesion of each patient. The correlation of SUVpeak and TBR was evaluated using linear regression and was stratified for patients undergoing PET/CT for primary staging, patients undergoing restaging at biochemical recurrence, and patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Moreover, the correlation was evaluated as a function of tracer uptake time, prostate-specific antigen level, and PET-positive tumor volume. Results: In total, 436 lesions were delineated (median, 1 per patient; range, 1-66). SUVpeak correlated well with TBR in patients with PCa and a total tumor volume of less than 200 cm3 (R 2 = 0.931). The correlation between SUV and TBR was not affected by disease setting, prostate-specific antigen level, or tumor volume. SUVpeak depended less on tracer uptake time than did TBR. Conclusion: For 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, SUVpeak correlates strongly with TBR. Therefore, it is a valuable simplified, semiquantitative measurement in patients with low-volume PCa (<200 cm3). SUVpeak can therefore be applied in 18F-DCFPyL PET assessment as an imaging biomarker to characterize tumors and to monitor treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves J L Bodar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; .,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; and
| | - Berend P F Koene
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard H E Jansen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; and
| | - Matthijs C F Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; and
| | - N Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network, Noord Holland, The Netherlands; and
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chong GO, Jeong SY, Lee YH, Park SH, Lee HJ, Lee SW, Hong DG, Lee YS. Improving the Prognostic Performance of SUV max in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Using Tumor-to-Liver and Tumor-to-Blood Standard Uptake Ratio for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061878. [PMID: 32560143 PMCID: PMC7355778 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate whether the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake normalization of the primary tumor to both the liver and blood pool and lymph nodes to both the liver and blood pool can enhance the discrimination for prognosis prediction in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS A total of 156 patients with cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB-IV) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumor (tSUVmax) and the lymph node (nSUVmax) divided by the SUVmean of the liver (tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and node-to-liver (NLR)) and blood pool (tumor-to-blood ratio (TBR) and node-to-blood ratio (NBR)) were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using clinical and metabolic parameters. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the accuracy of the metabolic parameters. RESULTS The multivariate analysis revealed that NLR (hazard ratio ((HR): 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.53-8.19; p = 0.0032) and NBR (HR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.02-11.19; p = 0.0457)) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, while TLR (HR: 4.16; 95% CI: 1.19-14.50; p = 0.0252), TBR (HR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.04-8.70; p = 0.0415), NLR (HR: 4.84; 95% CI: 1.58-14.81; p = 0.0057), and NBR (HR: 6.87; 95% CI: 1.55-30.54; p = 0.0113) were significant prognostic factors for OS. The normalization of tSUVmax to the liver or blood pool enhanced the discrimination for prediction of recurrence (tSUVmax vs. TLR; p = 0.0056 and tSUVmax vs. TBR; p = 0.0099) and death (tSUVmax vs. TLR; p < 0.0001 and tSUVmax vs. TBR; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The normalization of tSUVmax was an independent prognostic factor and improved the discrimination for the prediction of tumor recurrence and death in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with CCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.); (H.J.L.); (D.G.H.); (Y.S.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Shin Young Jeong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Correspondence:
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.); (H.J.L.); (D.G.H.); (Y.S.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Shin-Hyung Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.); (H.J.L.); (D.G.H.); (Y.S.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Sang-Woo Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.); (H.J.L.); (D.G.H.); (Y.S.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.); (H.J.L.); (D.G.H.); (Y.S.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| |
Collapse
|