1
|
Park SY, Woo S, Park KJ, Westphalen AC. A pictorial essay of PI-RADS pearls and pitfalls: toward less ambiguity and better practice. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3190-3205. [PMID: 38704782 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04273-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was designed to standardize the interpretation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate, aiding in assessing the probability of clinically significant prostate cancer. By providing a structured scoring system, it enables better risk stratification, guiding decisions regarding the need for biopsy and subsequent treatment options. In this article, we explore both the strengths and weaknesses of PI-RADS, offering insights into its updated diagnostic performance and clinical applications, while also addressing potential pitfalls using diverse, representative MRI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Yoon Park
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., 2nd Floor, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Kye Jin Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 86 Asanbyeongwon-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Antonio C Westphalen
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., 2nd Floor, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., 2nd Floor, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., 2nd Floor, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kohjimoto Y, Uemura H, Yoshida M, Hinotsu S, Takahashi S, Takeuchi T, Suzuki K, Shinmoto H, Tamada T, Inoue T, Sugimoto M, Takenaka A, Habuchi T, Ishikawa H, Mizowaki T, Saito S, Miyake H, Matsubara N, Nonomura N, Sakai H, Ito A, Ukimura O, Matsuyama H, Hara I. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer 2023. Int J Urol 2024. [PMID: 39078210 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
This fourth edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2023 is compiled. It was revised under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, with members selected from multiple academic societies and related organizations (Japan Radiological Society, Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology, the Department of EBM and guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Japanese Society of Pathology, and the patient group (NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association)), in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2020 ver. 3.0). The most important feature of this revision is the adoption of systematic reviews (SRs) in determining recommendations for 14 clinical questions (CQs). Qualitative SRs for these questions were conducted, and the final recommendations were made based on the results through the votes of 24 members of the guideline development group. Five algorithms based on these results were also created. Contents not covered by the SRs, which are considered textbook material, have been described in the general statement. In the general statement, a literature search for 14 areas was conducted; then, based on the general statement and CQs of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2016, the findings revealed after the 2016 guidelines were mainly described. This article provides an overview of these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
- Department of EBM and Guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shinmoto
- Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Matsubara
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Sakai
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
- Department of Urology, JA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Isao Hara
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abramson M, DeMasi M, Zhu D, Hines L, Lin W, Kanmaniraja D, Chernyak V, Agalliu I, Watts KL. Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in a diverse, multiethnic population. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2491-2498. [PMID: 38839651 PMCID: PMC11286685 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04332-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is not yet satisfactory performance data comparing multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) versus biparametric MRI (bpMRI) for detecting prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in high-risk populations. We compared both protocols for detecting overall PCa and clinically significant PCa (CS-PCa; defined as Grade Group ≥ 2) in a multiethnic urban population. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical record data from men who underwent image-guided fusion prostate biopsy (FB) between 2016 and 2021 at our institution. Patient characteristics, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores, and FB outcomes were analyzed based on MRI protocol. Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine associations of bpMRI versus mpMRI for detecting overall PCa and CS-PCa in targeted lesions, among all patients and stratified by race/ethnicity. RESULTS Overall, 566 men (44.0% Non-Hispanic Black [NHB]; 27.0% Hispanic) with 975 PI-RADS 3-5 lesions on MRI underwent FB. Of these, 312 (55%) men with 497 lesions underwent mpMRI and 254 (45%) men with 478 lesions underwent bpMRI. On multivariate analyses among all men, the odds of detecting overall PCa (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05-3.11, p = 0.031) and CS-PCa (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.16-4.00, p = 0.014) on FB were higher for lesions identified on bpMRI than mpMRI. When stratified by race/ethnicity, the odds of detecting overall PCa (OR = 1.86; p = 0.15) and CS-PCa (OR = 2.20; p = 0.06) were not statistically different between lesions detected on bpMRI or mpMRI. CONCLUSION BpMRI has similar diagnostic performance to mpMRI in detecting overall and CS-PCa within a racially/ethnically diverse population. BpMRI can be utilized for evaluating suspected CS-PCa among NHB and Hispanic men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Abramson
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Matthew DeMasi
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Denzel Zhu
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Laena Hines
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Wilson Lin
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Ilir Agalliu
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Kara L Watts
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1250 Waters Place, Tower 1; Penthouse, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Englman C, Barrett T, Moore CM, Giganti F. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Expanding the Role of MR Imaging and the Use of PRECISE Criteria. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:69-92. [PMID: 37973246 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has had an expanding role in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. It can improve the accuracy of prostate biopsies, assist in patient selection, and help monitor cancer progression. The PRECISE recommendations standardize reporting of serial MR imaging scans during AS. We summarize the evidence on MR imaging-led AS and provide a clinical primer to help report using the PRECISE criteria. Some limitations to both serial imaging and the PRECISE recommendations must be considered as we move toward a more individualized risk-stratified approach to AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Englman
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Box 218, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK; Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Box 218, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W7TY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsuoka Y, Ueno Y, Uehara S, Tanaka H, Kobayashi M, Tanaka H, Yoshida S, Yokoyama M, Kumazawa I, Fujii Y. Deep-learning prostate cancer detection and segmentation on biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Int J Urol 2023; 30:1103-1111. [PMID: 37605627 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop diagnostic algorithms of multisequence prostate magnetic resonance imaging for cancer detection and segmentation using deep learning and explore values of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in multiparametric imaging, compared with biparametric imaging. METHODS We collected 3227 multiparametric imaging sets from 332 patients, including 218 cancer patients (291 biopsy-proven foci) and 114 noncancer patients. Diagnostic algorithms of T2-weighted, T2-weighted plus dynamic contrast-enhanced, biparametric, and multiparametric imaging were built using 2578 sets, and their performance for clinically significant cancer was evaluated using 649 sets. RESULTS Biparametric and multiparametric imaging had following region-based performance: sensitivity of 71.9% and 74.8% (p = 0.394) and positive predictive value of 61.3% and 74.8% (p = 0.013), respectively. In side-specific analyses of cancer images, the specificity was 72.6% and 89.5% (p < 0.001) and the negative predictive value was 78.9% and 83.5% (p = 0.364), respectively. False-negative cancer on multiparametric imaging was smaller (p = 0.002) and more dominant with grade group ≤2 (p = 0.028) than true positive foci. In the peripheral zone, false-positive regions on biparametric imaging turned out to be true negative on multiparametric imaging more frequently compared with the transition zone (78.3% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.018). In contrast, T2-weighted plus dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging had lower specificity than T2-weighted imaging (41.1% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS When using deep learning, multiparametric imaging provides superior performance to biparametric imaging in the specificity and positive predictive value, especially in the peripheral zone. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging helps reduce overdiagnosis in multiparametric imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoh Matsuoka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Ueno
- Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sho Uehara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanaka
- Department of Radiology, Ochanomizu Surugadai Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minato Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itsuo Kumazawa
- Laboratory for Future Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Handke AE, Ritter M, Albers P, Noldus J, Radtke JP, Krausewitz P. [Prostate cancer-multiparametric MRI and alternative approaches in intervention and therapy planning]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 62:1160-1168. [PMID: 37666944 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has gained importance and plays a crucial role in both personalized diagnostics and increasingly in the treatment planning for patients with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to present established and innovative applications of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, it will explore alternative approaches and compare them in a comprehensive manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature review on the application of mpMRI for biopsy and therapy planning was conducted. RESULTS The integration of modern imaging techniques, especially mpMRI, into the diagnostic algorithm has revolutionized prostate cancer diagnosis. MRI and MRI-guided biopsy detect more significant prostate cancer, with the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies and the diagnosis of clinically insignificant carcinomas. In addition, MRI provides crucial information for risk stratification and treatment planning in prostate cancer patients, both before radical prostatectomy and during active surveillance. CONCLUSION Multiparametric MRI offers significant added value for the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. The advancement of MRI analysis, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms, holds the potential for further enhancing imaging diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analena Elisa Handke
- Marienhospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Deutschland
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Peter Albers
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Abteilung für Personalisierte Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Marienhospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Deutschland
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
- Abteilung für Personalisierte Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chandrasekar T, Denisenko A, Mico V, McPartland C, Shah Y, Mark JR, Lallas CD, Fonshell C, Danella J, Jacobs B, Lanchoney T, Raman JD, Tomaszewski J, Reese A, Singer EA, Ginzburg S, Smaldone M, Uzzo R, Guzzo TJ, Trabulsi EJ. Multiparametric MRI is not sufficient for prostate cancer staging: A single institutional experience validated by a multi-institutional regional collaborative. Urol Oncol 2023:S1078-1439(23)00162-X. [PMID: 37357123 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly utilized in prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis and staging. While Level 1 data supports MRI utility in CaP diagnosis, there is less data on staging utility. We sought to evaluate the real-world accuracy of mpMRI in staging localized CaP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for CaP in 2021 at our institution were identified. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mpMRI in predicting pT2N0 organ confined disease , extracapsular extension , seminal vesicle invasion , lymph node involvement, and bladder neck invasion were evaluated. Associations between MRI accuracy and AUA risk stratification (AUA RS), MRI institution (MRI-I), MRI strength (1.5 vs. 3T) (MRI-S), and MRI timing (MRI-T) were assessed. These analyses were repeated using Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC) data. RESULTS Institutional and community mpMRI CaP staging data demonstrated poor sensitivity (2.9%-49.2%% vs. 16.8%-24.4%), positive predictive value (40%-100% vs. 35.8%-68.2%), and negative predictive value (56.3%-94.3% vs. 68.4%-96.2%) in predicting surgical pathologic features - in contrast, specificity (89.1%-100% vs. 93.9%-98.6%) was adequate. mpMRI accuracy for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with AUA RS. There was no association between mpMRI accuracy and MRI-I, MRI-S, and MRI-T. CONCLUSION Despite enthusiasm for its use, in a real-world setting, mpMRI appears to be a poor staging study for localized CaP and is unreliable as the sole means of staging patients prior to prostatectomy. mpMRI should be used cautiously as a staging tool for CaP, and should be interpreted considering individual patient risk strata.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vasil Mico
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA
| | | | - Yash Shah
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James R Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Bruce Jacobs
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jay D Raman
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | | | - Adam Reese
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Serge Ginzburg
- Department of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pan Y, Shen C, Chen X, Cao D, Jiang J, Xu W, Ji C, Pan X, Zheng B. bpMRI and mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Front Surg 2023; 9:1096387. [PMID: 36726941 PMCID: PMC9885087 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1096387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to compare the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) by biparametric (bp-) and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Materials and Methods A total of 699 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in the Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the influencing factors associated with the detection rates of PCa and csPCa. According to MRI examination before biopsy, the patients were divided into bpMRI group and mpMRI group. The detection rates of PCa and csPCa by bpMRI and mpMRI were compared. Furthermore, stratified analysis was performed for patients in these two groups to compare the detection rates of PCa and csPCa at different tPSA intervals, different prostate volume (PV) intervals and different PI-RADS V2 scores. Results A total of 571 patients were finally analyzed in this study after exclusion, and the overall detection rate of PCa was 54.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that patient age, tPSA level, prostate volume and PI-RADS V2 score were independent risk factors affecting the detection rates of PCa and csPCa. The detection rates of PCa and csPCa by bpMRI and mpMRI were comparable (51.3% vs. 57.9%, 44.0% vs. 48.0%, both P > 0.05), with no statistical significance. In the tPSA 10-20 ng/ml interval, the detection rates of PCa (59.72% vs. 40.35%, P = 0.011) and csPCa (51.39% vs. 28.82%, P = 0.005) by mpMRI were significantly higher than those by bpMRI, while in other tPSA interval (tPSA < 4 ng/ml, 4-10 ng/ml, 20-100 ng/ml), different PVs (≤30 ml, 30-60 ml, >60 ml) and different PI-RADS V2 scores (3, 4, and 5), the detection rates of PCa and csPCa were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion For detecting PCa and csPCa, bpMRI and mpMRI had similar diagnostic efficacies, whereas mpMRI detected more PCa and csPCa in the tPSA interval of 10-20 ng/ml.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongsheng Pan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Cheng Shen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China,Medical Research Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xinfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Dongliang Cao
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jie Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China,Medical Research Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Chen Ji
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xiaodong Pan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Bing Zheng
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China,Correspondence: Bing Zheng
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang SD, Reinhold C, Kirkpatrick IDC, Clarke SE, Schieda N, Hurrell C, Cool DW, Tunis AS, Alabousi A, Diederichs BJ, Haider MA. Canadian Association of Radiologists Prostate MRI White Paper. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022; 73:626-638. [PMID: 35971326 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221105532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy and the third most common cause of death in Canadian men. In light of evolving diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer and the increased use of MRI, which now includes its use in men prior to biopsy, the Canadian Association of Radiologists established a Prostate MRI Working Group to produce a white paper to provide recommendations on establishing and maintaining a Prostate MRI Programme in the context of the Canadian healthcare system. The recommendations, which are based on available scientific evidence and/or expert consensus, are intended to maintain quality in image acquisition, interpretation, reporting and targeted biopsy to ensure optimal patient care. The paper covers technique, reporting, quality assurance and targeted biopsy considerations and includes appendices detailing suggested reporting templates, quality assessment tools and sample image acquisition protocols relevant to the Canadian healthcare context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia D Chang
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory (AIPHL), Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Nicola Schieda
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital- Civic Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Derek W Cool
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Adam S Tunis
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abdullah Alabousi
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Masoom A Haider
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belue MJ, Yilmaz EC, Daryanani A, Turkbey B. Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:804. [PMID: 35743835 PMCID: PMC9224842 DOI: 10.3390/life12060804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer is well-established. Based on the limited role of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) in PI-RADS v2.1, the risk of potential side effects, and the increased cost and time, there has been an increase in studies advocating for the omission of DCE from MRI assessments. Per PI-RADS v2.1, DCE is indicated in the assessment of PI-RADS 3 lesions in the peripheral zone, with its most pronounced effect when T2WI and DWI are of insufficient quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodology and reporting in the literature from the past 5 years regarding the use of DCE in prostate MRI, especially with respect to the indications for DCE as stated in PI-RADS v2.1, and to describe the different approaches used across the studies. We searched for studies investigating the use of bpMRI and/or mpMRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer between January 2017 and April 2022 in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Through the search process, a total of 269 studies were gathered and 41 remained after abstract and full-text screening. The following information was extracted from the eligible studies: general clinical and technical characteristics of the studies, the number of PI-RADS 3 lesions, different definitions of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), biopsy thresholds, reference standard methods, and number and experience of readers. Forty-one studies were included in the study. Only 51% (21/41) of studies reported the prevalence of csPCa in their equivocal lesion (PI-RADS category 3 lesions) subgroups. Of the included studies, none (0/41) performed a stratified sub-analysis of the DCE benefit versus MRI quality and 46% (19/41) made explicit statements about removing MRI scans based on a range of factors including motion, noise, and image artifacts. Furthermore, the number of studies investigating the role of DCE using readers with varying experience was relatively low. This review demonstrates that a high proportion of the studies investigating whether bpMRI can replace mpMRI did not transparently report information inherent to their study design concerning the key indications of DCE, such as the number of clinically insignificant/significant PI-RADS 3 lesions, nor did they provide any sub-analyses to test image quality, with some removing bad quality MRI scans altogether, or reader-experience-dependency indications for DCE. For the studies that reported on most of the DCE indications, their conclusions about the utility of DCE were heavily definition-dependent (with varying definitions of csPCa and of the PI-RADS category biopsy significance threshold). Reporting the information inherent to the study design and related to the specific indications for DCE as stated in PI-RADS v2.1 is needed to determine whether DCE is helpful or not. With most of the recent literature being retrospective and not including the data related to DCE indications in particular, the ongoing dispute between bpMRI and mpMRI is likely to linger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892-9760, USA; (M.J.B.); (E.C.Y.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hötker AM, Vargas HA, Donati OF. Abbreviated MR Protocols in Prostate MRI. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12040552. [PMID: 35455043 PMCID: PMC9029675 DOI: 10.3390/life12040552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate MRI is an integral part of the clinical work-up in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer, and its use has been increasing steadily over the last years. To further its general availability and the number of men benefitting from it and to reduce the costs associated with MR, several approaches have been developed to shorten examination times, e.g., by focusing on sequences that provide the most useful information, employing new technological achievements, or improving the workflow in the MR suite. This review highlights these approaches; discusses their implications, advantages, and disadvantages; and serves as a starting point whenever an abbreviated prostate MRI protocol is being considered for implementation in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas M. Hötker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Olivio F. Donati
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cole AP, Langbein BJ, Giganti F, Fennessy FM, Tempany CM, Emberton M. Is perfect the enemy of good? Weighing the evidence for biparametric MRI in prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210840. [PMID: 34826223 PMCID: PMC8978228 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of multiparametric MRI in diagnosis, staging and treatment planning for prostate cancer is well established. However, there remain several challenges to widespread adoption. One such challenge is the duration and cost of the examination. Abbreviated exams omitting contrast-enhanced sequences may help address this challenge. In this review, we will discuss the rationale for biparametric MRI for detection and characterization of clinically significant prostate cancer prior to biopsy and synthesize the published literature. We will weigh up the advantages and disadvantages to this approach and lay out a conceptual cost/benefit analysis regarding adoption of biparametric MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Clare M. Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ng A, Khetrapal P, Kasivisvanathan V. Is It PRIME Time for Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis? Eur Urol 2022; 82:1-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
14
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abbreviated Bi-Parametric MRI (a-bpMRI) for Prostate Cancer Detection and Screening: A Multi-Reader Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020231. [PMID: 35204322 PMCID: PMC8871361 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: There is currently limited evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated biparametric MRI (a-bpMRI) protocols for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and screening. In the present study, we aim to investigate the performance of a-bpMRI among multiple readers and its potential application to an imaging-based screening setting. (2) Methods: A total of 151 men who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate and transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies were retrospectively selected. Corresponding bpMRI (multiplanar T2WI, DWI, ADC maps) and a-bpMRI (axial T2WI and b 2000 s/mm2 DWI only) dataset were derived from mpMRI. Three experienced radiologists scored a-bpMRI, standard biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and mpMRI in separate sessions. Diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement of a-bpMRI was tested for different positivity thresholds and compared to bpMRI and mpMRI. Predictive values of a-bpMRI were computed for lower levels of PCa prevalence to simulate a screening setting. The primary definition of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was Gleason ≥ 4 + 3, or cancer core length ≥ 6 mm. (3) Results: The median age was 62 years, the median PSA was 6.8 ng/mL, and the csPCa prevalence was 40%. Using a cut off of MRI score ≥ 3, the sensitivity and specificity of a-bpMRI were 92% and 48%, respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity compared to bpMRI and mpMRI. Interreader agreement of a-bpMRI was moderate (AC1 0.58). For a low prevalence of csPCa (e.g., <10%), higher cut offs (MRI score ≥ 4) yield a more favourable balance between the predictive values and positivity rate of MRI. (4) Conclusion: Abbreviated bpMRI protocols could match the diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI and mpMRI for the detection of csPCa. If a-bpMRI is used in low-prevalence settings, higher cut-offs for MRI positivity should be prioritised.
Collapse
|
15
|
Schick F, Pieper CC, Kupczyk P, Almansour H, Keller G, Springer F, Mürtz P, Endler C, Sprinkart AM, Kaufmann S, Herrmann J, Attenberger UI. 1.5 vs 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review of Favorite Clinical Applications for Both Field Strengths-Part 1. Invest Radiol 2021; 56:680-691. [PMID: 34324464 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems with a field strength of 3 T have been offered by all leading manufacturers for approximately 2 decades and are increasingly used in clinical diagnostics despite higher costs. Technologically, MRI systems operating at 3 T have reached a high standard in recent years, as well as the 1.5-T devices that have been in use for a longer time. For modern MRI systems with 3 T, more complexity is required, especially for the magnet and the radiofrequency (RF) system (with multichannel transmission). Many clinical applications benefit greatly from the higher field strength due to the higher signal yield (eg, imaging of the brain or extremities), but there are also applications where the disadvantages of 3 T might outweigh the advantages (eg, lung imaging or examinations in the presence of implants). This review describes some technical features of modern 1.5-T and 3-T whole-body MRI systems, and reports on the experience of using both types of devices in different clinical settings, with all sections written by specialist radiologists in the respective fields.This first part of the review includes an overview of the general physicotechnical aspects of both field strengths and elaborates the special conditions of diffusion imaging. Many relevant aspects in the application areas of musculoskeletal imaging, abdominal imaging, and prostate diagnostics are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fritz Schick
- From the Section of Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen
| | | | - Patrick Kupczyk
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| | - Haidara Almansour
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gabriel Keller
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Fabian Springer
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Petra Mürtz
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| | - Christoph Endler
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| | - Alois M Sprinkart
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Judith Herrmann
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic, and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike I Attenberger
- Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor M, Gabe R, Padhani AR, Rockall A, Sokhi H, Tam H, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:596-611. [PMID: 33219368 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00298-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), the use of three multiple imaging sequences, typically T2-weighted, diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images, has a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant cancer. Current guidance now recommends its use prior to biopsy. However, the impact of DCE is currently under debate regarding test accuracy. Biparametric MRI (bpMRI), using only T2 and DWI has been proposed as a viable alternative. We conducted a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis to further examine the diagnostic performance of bpMRI in the diagnosis of any and clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature from 01/01/2017 to 06/07/2019 was performed by two independent reviewers using predefined search criteria. The index test was biparametric MRI and the reference standard whole-mount prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. Quality of included studies was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Statistical analysis included pooled diagnostic performance (sensitivity; specificity; AUC), meta-regression of possible covariates and head-to-head comparisons of bpMRI and mpMRI where both were performed in the same study. RESULTS Forty-four articles were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity for any cancer detection was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), specificity 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) for bpMRI. The summary ROC curve yielded a high AUC value (AUC = 0.86). The pooled sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), specificity 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.84) and the AUC value was 0.87. Meta-regression analysis revealed no difference in the pooled diagnostic estimates between bpMRI and mpMRI. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis on contemporary studies shows that bpMRI offers comparable test accuracies to mpMRI in detecting prostate cancer. These data are broadly supportive of the bpMRI approach but heterogeneity does not allow definitive recommendations to be made. There is a need for prospective multicentre studies of bpMRI in biopsy naïve men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Bass
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - A Pantovic
- Centre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - R Gabe
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - A Rockall
- Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - H Sokhi
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Tam
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hötker AM, Da Mutten R, Tiessen A, Konukoglu E, Donati OF. Improving workflow in prostate MRI: AI-based decision-making on biparametric or multiparametric MRI. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:112. [PMID: 34370164 PMCID: PMC8353049 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate an artificial intelligence algorithm to decide on the necessity of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (DCE) in prostate MRI. METHODS This study was approved by the institutional review board and requirement for study-specific informed consent was waived. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed on 300 prostate MRI examinations. Consensus of two expert readers on the necessity of DCE acted as reference standard. The CNN was validated in a separate cohort of 100 prostate MRI examinations from the same vendor and 31 examinations from a different vendor. Sensitivity/specificity were calculated using ROC curve analysis and results were compared to decisions made by a radiology technician. RESULTS The CNN reached a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 68.8% (AUC: 0.88) for the necessity of DCE, correctly assigning 44%/34% of patients to a biparametric/multiparametric protocol. In 2% of all patients, the CNN incorrectly decided on omitting DCE. With a technician reaching a sensitivity of 63.9% and specificity of 89.1%, the use of the CNN would allow for an increase in sensitivity of 30.5%. The CNN achieved an AUC of 0.73 in a set of examinations from a different vendor. CONCLUSIONS The CNN would have correctly assigned 78% of patients to a biparametric or multiparametric protocol, with only 2% of all patients requiring re-examination to add DCE sequences. Integrating this CNN in clinical routine could render the requirement for on-table monitoring obsolete by performing contrast-enhanced MRI only when needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas M Hötker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Raffaele Da Mutten
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anja Tiessen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ender Konukoglu
- Computer Vision Laboratory, Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivio F Donati
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Solyanik O, Heimer M. [Clinical impact of abbreviated unenhanced prostate protocols in magnetic resonance imaging]. Radiologe 2021; 61:810-817. [PMID: 34297140 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00890-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with gadolinium-(Gd)-based contrast agents is the diagnostic standard of care in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Recent data suggest equivalent performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and mpMRI in defined indications. OBJECTIVES Evaluation of the current role of abbreviated or unenhanced protocols in MRI of the prostate in various clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS Evaluation of clinical trials, guidelines and expert opinions. RESULTS The use of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequences is associated with contrast agent-associated risks and has significant impact on the imaging procedure and costs. Arguments for and against the use of contrast agent in prostate protocols as well as equivalence from bpMRI and mpMRI are discussed. CONCLUSIONS Currently, bpMRI can only be performed if very good image quality is available and in the hands of a radiologist with extensive experience in reading prostate MRI. There is a need for prospective studies to qualify bpMRI as the diagnostic method for the primary diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Solyanik
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU-Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - Maurice Heimer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU-Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Morka N, Simpson BS, Ball R, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Kelly D, Whitaker HC, Emberton M, Norris JM. Clinical outcomes associated with prostate cancer conspicuity on biparametric and multiparametric MRI: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047664. [PMID: 33952556 PMCID: PMC8103365 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that visibility of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance (MRI) may be related to likelihood of adverse pathological outcomes. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy remains a significant clinical challenge and a means of predicting likelihood of this prior to surgery could inform treatment choice. It appears that MRI could be a potential candidate strategy for BCR prediction, and as such, there is a need to review extant literature on the prognostic capability of MRI. Here, we describe a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in predicting BCR following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases will be searched and screening will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In order to meet the inclusion criteria, papers must be English-language articles involving patients who have had bpMRI or mpMRI for suspected prostate cancer and have undergone radical prostatectomy as definitive therapy. Patients must have had prostate-specific antigen monitoring before and after surgery. All relevant papers published from July 1977 to October 2020 will be eligible for inclusion. The Newcastle-Ottawa score will be used to determine the quality and bias of the studies. This protocol is written in-line with the PRISMA protocol 2015 checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION There are no relevant ethical concerns. Dissemination of this protocol will be via peer-reviewed journals as well as national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020206074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Morka
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Benjamin S Simpson
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rhys Ball
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joseph M Norris
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:855-862. [PMID: 33893066 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urological guidelines recommend multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). The resulting increase in MRI demand might place health care systems under substantial stress. OBJECTIVE To determine whether single-plane biparametric MRI (fast MRI) workup could represent an alternative to mpMRI in the detection of clinically significant (cs) PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between April 2018 and February 2020, 311 biopsy-naïve men aged ≤75 yr with PSA ≤15 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination were randomly assigned to 1.5-T fast MRI (n = 213) or mpMRI (n = 98). INTERVENTION All MRI examinations were classified according to Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2. Men scored PI-RADS 1-2 underwent 12-core standard biopsy (SBx) and those with PI-RADS 4-5 on fast MRI or PI-RADS 3-5 on mpMRI underwent targeted biopsy in combination with SBx. Equivocal cases on fast MRI (PI-RADS 3) underwent mpMRI and then biopsy according to the findings. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was to compare the detection rate of csPCa in both study arms, setting a 10% difference for noninferiority. The secondary outcome was to assess the role of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in ruling out men who could avoid biopsy among those with equivocal findings on fast MRI. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The overall MRI detection rate for csPCa was 23.5% (50/213; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.0-29.8%) with fast MRI and 32.7% (32/98; 95% CI 23.6-42.9%) with mpMRI (difference 9.2%; p = 0.09). The reproducibility of the study could have been affected by its single-center nature. CONCLUSIONS Fast MRI followed by mpMRI in equivocal cases is not inferior to mpMRI in the detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve men aged ≤75 yr with PSA ≤15 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination. These findings could pave the way to broader use of MRI for PCa diagnosis. PATIENT SUMMARY A faster MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) protocol with no contrast agent and fewer scan sequences for examination of the prostate is not inferior to the typical MRI approach in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. If our findings are confirmed in other studies, fast MRI could represent a time-saving and less invasive examination for men with suspicion of prostate cancer. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03693703.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zeng J, Cheng Q, Zhang D, Fan M, Shi C, Luo L. Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:620628. [PMID: 33680965 PMCID: PMC7933498 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) now has been used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). Equivocal lesions are defined as PIRADS category 3 or a Likert scale of 1 to 5 category 3 lesions. Currently, there are no clear recommendations for the management of these lesions. This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic capacity of DCE-MRI for PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in equivocal lesions. Materials and methods Two researchers searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify studies that met our subject. We searched for articles that mention the accuracy of the diagnosis of DCE-MRI for PCa or csPCa in equivocal lesions and used histopathological results as the reference standard. We used a tool (the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool) to evaluate the quality of the studies that we screened out. Meta-regression was used to explore the reasons for heterogeneity in results. Results Ten articles were eventually included in our study. The sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DCE-MRI in diagnosing csPCa were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46–0.68). The sensitivity and specificity and 95% CI for DCE-MRI in diagnosing PCa were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.46–0.68), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45–0.70). The areas under the curve (AUC) of DCE-MRI were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63–0.71) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.55–0.64) while diagnosing csPCa and PCa. Through meta-regression, we found that study design, magnetic field strength, the definition of csPCa, and the scoring system were the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the role of DCE-MRI in equivocal lesions may be limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zeng
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingqing Cheng
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meng Fan
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changzheng Shi
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Engineering Research Center of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangping Luo
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Engineering Research Center of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Update on Multiparametric Prostate MRI During Active Surveillance: Current and Future Trends and Role of the PRECISE Recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:943-951. [PMID: 32755219 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Active surveillance for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer is a conservative management approach that aims to avoid or delay active treatment until there is evidence of disease progression. In recent years, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been increasingly used in active surveillance and has shown great promise in patient selection and monitoring. This has been corroborated by publication of the Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations, which define the ideal reporting standards for mpMRI during active surveillance. The PRECISE recommendations include a system that assigns a score from 1 to 5 (the PRECISE score) for the assessment of radiologic change on serial mpMRI scans. PRECISE scores are defined as follows: a score of 3 indicates radiologic stability, a score of 1 or 2 denotes radiologic regression, and a score of 4 or 5 indicates radiologic progression. In the present study, we discuss current and future trends in the use of mpMRI during active surveillance and illustrate the natural history of prostate cancer on serial scans according to the PRECISE recommendations. We highlight how the ability to classify radiologic change on mpMRI with use of the PRECISE recommendations helps clinical decision making.
Collapse
|
23
|
Radtke JP, Schimmöller L. [Is contrast medium essential in the initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of prostate cancer?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:238-240. [PMID: 33506287 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01445-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J P Radtke
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, AöR, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
- Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - L Schimmöller
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Palumbo P, Manetta R, Izzo A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, De Filippo M, Splendiani A, Di Cesare E, Masciocchi C, Barile A. Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement. Gland Surg 2020; 9:2235-2247. [PMID: 33447576 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in male population. Over the last few years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be a robust clinical tool for identification and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. Though suggestions by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology to use complete multiparametric (mp) T2-weighted/diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)/dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) acquisition for all prostate MRI examinations, the real advantage of functional DCE remains a matter of debate. Recent studies demonstrate that biparametric (bp) and mp approaches have similar accuracy, but controversial evidences remain, and the specific potential benefits of contrast medium administration are still poorly discussed in literature. The bp approach is in fact sufficient in most cases to adequately identify a negative test, or to accurately define the degree of aggressiveness of a lesion, especially if larger or with major characteristics of malignancy. This feature would give the DCE a secondary role, probably limited to a second evaluation of the lesion location, for detecting small cancer or in case of controversy. However, DCE has proved to increase the sensitivity of prostate MRI, though a less specificity. Therefore, an appropriate decision algorithm is needed to standardize the MRI approach. Aim of this review study was to provide a schematic description of bpMRI and mpMRI approaches in the study of prostatic anatomy, focusing on comparative validity and current DCE application. Additional theoretical considerations on prostate MRI are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Rosa Manetta
- Radiology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Izzo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Arrigoni
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMec), Section of Radiology, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandra Splendiani
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Cesare
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Masciocchi
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Udayakumar N, Porter KK. How Fast Can We Go: Abbreviated Prostate MR Protocols. Curr Urol Rep 2020; 21:59. [PMID: 33135121 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-020-01008-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), composed of T2WI, DWI, and DCE sequences, is effective in identifying prostate cancer (PCa), but length and cost preclude its application as a PCa screening tool. Here we review abbreviated MRI protocols that shorten or omit conventional mpMRI components to reduce scan time and expense without forgoing diagnostic accuracy. RECENT FINDINGS The DCE sequence, which plays a limited diagnostic role in PI-RADS, is eliminated in variations of the biparametric MRI (bpMRI). T2WI, the lengthiest sequence, is truncated by only acquiring the axial plane or utilizing 3D acquisition with subsequent 2D reconstruction. DW-EPISMS further accelerates DWI acquisition. The fastest protocol described to date consists of just DW-EPISMS and axial-only 2D T2WI and runs less than 5 min. Abbreviated protocols can mitigate scan expense and increase scan access, allowing prostate MRI to become an efficient PCa screening tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Udayakumar
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA
| | - Kristin K Porter
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street S, JT N374, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bao J, Zhi R, Hou Y, Zhang J, Wu C, Wang X, Zhang Y. Optimized
MRI
Assessment for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A
STARD
‐Compliant Two‐Center Study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 53:1210-1219. [PMID: 33075177 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Bao
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China
| | - Rui Zhi
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Ying Hou
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Chen‐Jiang Wu
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Xi‐Ming Wang
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China
| | - Yu‐Dong Zhang
- Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
French WW, Wallen EM. Advances in the diagnostic options for prostate cancer. Postgrad Med 2020; 132:52-62. [PMID: 32900250 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1822067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, despite the controversies surrounding prostate cancer screening, significant refinements have improved its application. PSA screening, although it has been questioned, appears to confer a mortality benefit and remains the most effective way to identify the possible presence of prostate cancer. Methods to improve the specificity of PSA screening and limit overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, including risk-stratified screening regimens, are currently being utilized. Certain imaging modalities, such as multiparametric MRI, have proven to be excellent adjuncts providing improved risk stratification and the ability for targeted biopsies; however, concerns over variability in interpretation and generalizability persist. A number of novel biomarkers have become available with nearly all demonstrating the ability to improve upon the specificity of PSA screening; however, optimal timing, direct comparisons, and usefulness in conjunction with imaging modalities remain to be elucidated. With the improvement in testing options and recognition of the risk/benefit ratio for men undergoing screening for prostate cancer, the increasing role of shared decision making in the process is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W French
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center , Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Eric M Wallen
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center , Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Withey SJ, Amlani A. The Added Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Sequences in Prostate MRI. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2020; 2:e209031. [PMID: 33778745 PMCID: PMC7983763 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020209031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
29
|
Bandini M, Calareso G, Raggi D, Marandino L, Colecchia M, Gallina A, Giannatempo P, Pederzoli F, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Capitanio U, Colombo R, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, De Cobelli F, Messina A, Necchi A. The Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences to Assist in the Decision Making of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 4:829-833. [PMID: 32605888 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Interim data from the PURE-01 study, using pembrolizumab before radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), suggested that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was able to predict the pathologic response. Owing to the availability of novel effective therapies in MIBC, the possibility to assess tumor response easily has become exceedingly important. The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the association between individual and combined MRI sequences, and the pathologic response in the final PURE-01 population. Images were internally evaluated and the diagnostic performance was analyzed for separate sequences, along with their combination. From February 2017 to December 2019, 143 patients were enrolled in PURE-01, and 123 with suitable paired imaging assessments before and after pembrolizumab tests (N = 246 mpMRI in total) were analyzed in relation to the pathologic response. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of all sequences to predict ypT0ypN0 response was 0.74. By excluding dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) assessment, the AUC was 0.74. When looking at ypT1/a/is ypN0 response, the AUC was 0.87 in both cases. Without DCE, 95% of patients with no evidence of disease resulted in ypT1/a/is ypN0 and 65% ypT0ypN0 responders. In conclusion, the final results confirmed the reliability of mpMRI and suggested the opportunity to avoid intravenous gadolinium contrast to personalize bladder-sparing strategies in radiologically complete responders. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the reliability of multiparametric bladder magnetic resonance imaging to predict the pathologic response to pembrolizumab administered before radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We observed that this radiologic examination is promising in the attempt to identify opportunities to spare the bladder in selected, radiologically defined complete responders. We also observed that the use of intravenous gadolinium contrast can be avoided in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02736266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Filippo Pederzoli
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Clinical and Experimental Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonella Messina
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|